LDAP max simultaneous connections

Hi,
I've got an Ironport C600 6.5.3-007
I set up one LDAP server profile with a maximum number of simultaneous connections of 50.
When I run a netstat command in CLI it appears to have 150 LDAP connexions established to the server.
Do you have any idea on why it doesn't display only 50?
Thank you
Arnaud

I think I've got my answer, actually 3 out of 4 Ironport were still with the version 6.5.0. The one which is in 6.5.3 displays 52 connections.
Here is what I found in the release Note for the 6.5.3 update
Fixed: LDAP Connections Greatly Exceed the Maximum Specified in the LDAP Server Profile
Previously, LDAP connections greatly exceeded the maximum specified in the LDAP server
profile. For example, if you set the maximum LDAP connection to 10, then the system would
open 30 connections: 10 for the IronPort Spam Quarantine, 10 for the end-user quarantine,
and 10 for the end-user quarantine UI. The fix reduced end-user quarantine and end-user
quarantine UI connections to one each. Now, for example, if you set the maximum LDAP
connection to 10, then the system opens only 12 connections: 10 for the IronPort Spam
Quarantine, 1 for the end-user quarantine, and 1 for the end-user quarantine UI. Or if
external authentication is enabled, then the system opens 22 connections: 10 for external

Similar Messages

Max number of simultaneous connections?

Hi everyone!
how is possible to determine in advance the max number of simultaneous connection for my FMS?
thanks!

Hi,
Like Jay had mentioned the limitation on the number of connection to server depends on the capability of your server.
You can get the maximum number of connections made to the server, number of active clients... etc details through Administration APIs.
'getServerStats' gives you the "total_connects", which is the maximum number of connections made to the server. "connected" property will return the number of active clients to your server at one point. It also has many more statistics for your reference. This api returns the overall information of the server. If you want to get the details for specific vhost, you can use getVHostStats or getActiveVHostStats. To get more details on Administration API, refer your pdf documentation on "Administration API", that gets installed in your system under "$Root\Flash Media Server\documentation\flashmediaserver_3.5_administrationAPI.pdf".
Regards,
Janaki L

Oracle 10g Express Edition - number of simultaneous connections

Goodmorning,
I'm goingo to test Oracle 10g Express Edition but I ned to know the max numbers of simultaneous connections it supports.
Many thanks to all.

Hi,
>>Can you tel me how to increase this number in oracle 10g express???
Just modifying the processes parameter is sufficient. The sessions parameter will be adjusted automatically.
SQL> alter system set processes=200 scope=spfile;
SQL> shutdown immediate
SQL> startupFor more information, take a look at this [url http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=1672879&#1672879]thread
Cheers
Legatti

AIR-LAP1131AG-E-K9 maximum of simultaneous connections

Hi,
Does any body know what is the maximum of simultaneous connections that the AIR-LAP1131AG-E-K9 access point supports?
Any help is much appreciated!

Currently it is suggested around 25 devices per radio. It really depends on the bandwidth that is required by applications. I have seen 50+ on and ap with just web and email traffic. I have also seen up to 4 with video transfers.
I know with the 7.2 code, you can specify they max user per radio or ap.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

DPS simultaneous connection help

I'm running DPS 5.2 SP3. I have 2 network groups, the first one is for anonymous access only. The first group has an on SSL bind action to change network groups to the SSL only group, which requires SSL. This is required, to restrict password based bind's on the insecure 389 LDAP port, but still allow anonymous non ssl connections to DPS. I.e password based binds are rejected on 389, but accepted on 636. Anonymous binds can connect on either 389 or 636.
Problem occurs if you try and restrict the number of simultanous connections per IP address. This setting works on the first anonymous network group, but fails on the second SSL group. The counter will start at 1, but it won't reset back to zero after an unbind.
Example: The counter for IP :xxx is now 1 and the limit is 5. On the 6th bind, the logs then complain and say:
The counter for IP: xxx is now 6 and the limit is 5, maximum number of connections from same IP reached for this group: Change group failing.
Has anyone had a similar problem? I had a ticket with Sun back in september, and they never resolved the problem, and told me I was running the lastest ldapfwd binary. I'm not even sure what the latest ldapfwd binary is, since it's very difficult to find any information on sunsolve.

albert geven wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> The connection of multiple multimeters to the gpib bus is normal, the
> only thing you need to do is switch them each to a unique address on
> this bus.
> Your program can best initialise all multimeters once in the beginning
> of your program and read out those meters when appropriate.
With many instruments there are two types of "initialise."
One type, which is a reset, choose range, etc., as you suggest can
be done at the beginning of a program or section of a program.
However, the other type of initialize is to sent the SCPI INIT command
to the instrument. This command tells the instrument to take a measurement
(or scan of measurements).
When dealing with multiple multimeters, there are at least 2 ways of
handling measurements. The slow way deals with one instrument at a
time -- using the SCPI commands INIT, wait FETCH?, or perhaps just READ?
sent to each instrument. It is slow because each instrument must wait
for the previous instrument to finish before it can start.
The better way is to set up each instrument for the desired measurement.
If simultaneous triggering is needed, either use some type of external
trigger or BUS trigger if the instrument can use it. After all instruments
are set up, issue the INIT command to each instrument, then trigger.
when all measurements are completed, use the FETC? command to get the
results from each instrument. Note that there may be Plug&Play drivers
to issue these commands for your instrument.
[email protected]
www.CompleteTest.com

Can I share my internet with my Ipad and simultaneously connect to a airport express that I use to remotely connect speakers?

Can I share my internet from my Imac with my Ipad and simultaneously connect to a airport express that I use to remotely to connect speakers?
The big problem that I'm having is that when internet sharing via the airport I can not simultaneously connect with my airport express. It would be great to be able to share internet from my Imac so I can be using my Ipad and at the sametime have my wife use the airport express to stream music in a different room. It would be awesome to be able to have the ability to do both. Does anybody know how?

Unless your iMac was made before 2006 (this forum is for old iMacs), you might get better assistance by posting in one of the following forum areas:
AirPort
Using iPad
iMac (Intel)

Network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server keeps reverting to user set 4

I didn't used to have this problem as far as I'm aware, but as of recently, I've noticed that if I try to download more than 4 of one thing at a time from the same site, it would fail. For instance, if I have up 5 web pages of streaming content, only 4 will load, the other 5th one will do nothing until I finish one of the others. Upon looking up some information on this, I saw that the network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server is set at "user set = 4", and if I change that number to anything else, it corresponds. If I click to 'reset' the number, it goes to the default of 6 - which is still less than what it used to be. I used to not even have a limit on this as far as I'm aware, or if I did, it was well beyond 10 and that wasn't a product of me manipulating it.
What I'm asking is this:
1) How do I make this so it permanently switches to a higher number? Every time I reset it to 6 or I manually change the number to something higher, once I close it, those settings go back to 4.
2) Why is it reverting and not staying the way I change it?
3) What's the purpose of this and why is it just recently doing it when I haven't put any new add-ons or made any other refinements to Firefox that I'm aware of?
Any help would be appreciated

Two possible causes for it resetting to 4 that I can think of.
# You have an add-on handing that pref and that is resetting it to 4 when Firefox is restarted.
# That pref is set via user.js and that causes it to go to that value as Firefox starts.
http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes <br />
http://kb.mozillazine.org/User.js_file

How to limit max IMAP connections in mail.app?

Hi folks,
due to Mailserver configuration limitations from Provider side like courier-imap settings "maxperip" = 4, some (like me) may have problems to use or connect more than one imap-account to the same server in mail.app.
In thunderbird you have the option to configure the max open connections per imap-account. If set to 1 connection, i'm able to use 4 imap-accounts.
But how to configure this in mail.app???
Thanks in advance,
paranoja

oh, as i found this seems to be an unfixed an verry old problem.
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=5820548
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=6204843&#6204843
It's really a shame that apple didn't fixed it since the problem is from 2007!!!
It seems that there was a key "CacheOveraggressively" in com.apple.mail.plist in earlier versions, but i can't find it there with Version 3.5 (930.3)!
Seems that the only real solution for now is to use thunderbird......
P.S.: Mail in IPodTouch has of course the same Problem!

Simultaneous connections to the same server from IE and NN

Hi,
We are using iws4.1.
IE5+ can make only atmost 2 simultaneous connections to our server and
NN makes 4 connections.
We found certain pages hosted by iws4.1 like www.netscape.com can make
more than 2 simultaneous connection from same browser.
The above tests are done from a dialup connection
Is there a way to increase the no. of simultaneous connections from both
IE and NN with the knowledge on the end user.
Thanks in advance
rvenky

Could you please post the code, if you do not mind. Also if you could post the connection pool definition of both the pools that would help too.
If the business method is coded in the following way
m1() {
conn1 = // get connection
conn2 = // get another connection
// do some thing with conn1
// do some thing else with conn2
conn1.close();
conn2.close();
Could you try modifying the code in the following way and see if that helps
m1() {
conn1 = // get connection
// do some thing with conn1
conn1.close();
Basically start using conn2 after conn1 is used
conn2 = // get another connection
// do some thing else with conn2
conn2.close();
regards
sankar

Help needed : javamail Too many simultaneous connections

Hello
i'm using javamail to develop a webmail
i've created a service Class , and all things works well , but i have a serious problem when i browse my webmail ( viewing folders: inbox / spam / etc or messages) i get an error saying :
Too many simultaneous connections. (Failure)
i know that the imap server dosen't support more than 10 simultaneous connections.
But i can't say to users using my webmail to do not a lot of actions !!! , and also when i use thunderbird for example it works fine without errors even if i do a lot of actions/connections
How can i solve that problem ?
Thanks
A1 OK [email protected] authenticated (Success)
A2 CAPABILITY
* CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT LITERAL+ IDLE NAMESPACE QUOTA ID XLIST CHILDREN X-GM-EXT-1
A2 OK Success
A3 SELECT INBOX
DEBUG: no connections in the pool, creating a new one
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen \*)]
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 616267767]
* 7 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UNSEEN 1]
* OK [UIDNEXT 90]
A3 OK [READ-WRITE] INBOX selected. (Success)
A4 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen)+
+* OK Gimap ready for requests from MyIP 24if2631473eyx.55+
+A0 CAPABILITY+
+* 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen))+
+A4 OK Success+
+* CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT IDLE NAMESPACE QUOTA XLIST CHILDREN XYZZY+
+A0 OK Thats all she wrote! 24if2631473eyx.55+
+A1 LOGIN myemail mypwd+
+A1 OK [email protected] authenticated (Success)+
+A2 CAPABILITY+
+* CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT LITERAL+ IDLE NAMESPACE QUOTA ID XLIST CHILDREN X-GM-EXT-1
A2 OK Success
A3 SELECT INBOX
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen \*)]
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 616267767]
* 7 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UNSEEN 1]
* OK [UIDNEXT 90]
A3 OK [READ-WRITE] INBOX selected. (Success)
A4 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen)
* OK Gimap ready for requests from MyIP 23if2388548eya.46
A0 CAPABILITY
* 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen))
A4 OK Success
* CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT IDLE NAMESPACE QUOTA XLIST CHILDREN XYZZY
A0 OK Thats all she wrote! 23if2388548eya.46
A1 LOGIN custom.infoma1 mypwd
A1 NO [ALERT] *Too many simultaneous connections. (Failure)*
A2 LOGOUT
* BYE Logout Requested 23if2388548eya.46
A2 OK Quoth the raven, nevermore... 23if2388548eya.46
A4 CLOSE
A4 CLOSE

Thunderbird supports disconnected or offline operation. It can disconnect from the server and then reconnect later
and synchronize its state, so that you never know it was disconnected.
You can do that too, but it's a lot of work.
For webmail, the simplest approach is usually to have only one folder open at a time for each user.
If your IMAP server is limiting you to 10 connections total, across all users, get a new IMAP server.

Maximum simultaneous connections for WRT350N

Hi,
What is the maximum number of simultaneous connections that the WRT350N router can handle whilst allowing 1 user to surf the internet?
I need to know this so I can set the maximum number of connections in uTorrent. My upload speed is 1.1 mbps, which is roughly 140 kBps.
The PC has a direct connection to the router, the wireless has been turned off.

There is no such defined number of user for TCP/IP connection.However,you can try to tweak the settings on the application and check if that helps.read this link and this link.

Basic IM app number of simultaneous connections

Hi all,
i wanted to know how to calculate or estimate the number of
simultaneous connections that one Flash Media Server installation
(one licence, one server) can handle, in the scope of a basic
Instant Messaging application (online presence and text chat). Did
some of you have direct experience about it?
I found informations only about video streaming & server
stress, but nothing about connections number alone.
Thanks

Well the actual number will depend on your hardware specs and
probably the operating system that FMS is running on. That said,
and a connection test alone, I was able to achieve over 4000
NetConnections to one FMS server on RHEL5, and then the client (not
the server) ran out of stack space because of the amount of sockets
that were concurrently opened. Note: take this number with a grain
of salt, as no activity was performed on the NetConnection. Also to
note, that streaming A/V is usually more intense than simple text
so those numbers would probably be safe to use.

"Max simultaneous tempalate requests" is shown as "-1", set and restart yields unstable server

After CHF4 applied to CF901 (standard) and updated to run JRE7 on Windows server 2008, "Max simultaneous tempalate requests" is shown as "-1".
We checked the neo-runtime.xml and all of the limits look normal. We have no idea where does that "-1" come from.
We try setting it to a sensible value (i.e. 25) and then restart, and the CF server becomes very unstable. We couldn't even log into CF Administrator. The other live CF site would go down for a few minutes, and up again for the next few minutes. CPU activity is close to 0, RAM usage is stable. CF server logs shows nothing wrong, but http log did not get requests from IIS when it's down.
What's wrong?
Bug report filed: https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3528480

Not a good plan, IMHO.
Once that $cred object is created, the user can discover the password:
$cred.GetNetworkCredential().password
I think you'd be much better off creating a constrained, delegated remote session endpoint on a server somewhere, using the admin credentials as the RunAs account, and then creating some functions in the session to restart servers or services and limit the
session to just running those functions. You can add whatever logging you want as part of the functions, and audit using the Powershell event logs on the server.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/heyscriptingguy/archive/2014/04/02/build-constrained-powershell-endpoint-using-configuration-file.aspx
Give the users you want to be able to perform server and service restarts Execute permssions for the endpoint.
They won't have any knowledge of the admin account that's being used, and can't do anything you haven't given then a function for.
[string](0..33|%{[char][int](46+("686552495351636652556262185355647068516270555358646562655775 0645570").substring(($_*2),2))})-replace " "

Does the socket implementation suport only 2 simultaneous connections?

Hi all,
I implemented this server the traditional way:
public void run() {
   while(state.isRunning()) {
      try {
         System.out.println("listening...");
         sourceSock = ssock.accept();
         System.out.println("new incoming connection");
         sourceSock.setSoTimeout(config.getHttpTimeout());
         new Thread(new ProxyHttpConnectionWorker(sourceSock, config)).start();
      } catch (IOException _ex) {
         config.out.trace(_ex.getMessage());
}It seems ok to me. I implemented it several times in a lot of situations.
However, this time I noted that after two simultaneous socket connections are opened (via accept()), all other connections I try to make from a client are blocking until one of the first two sockets close().
I mean, it seems to be blocking the incoming connections in the accept() method, because the string "listening..." was printed, but the string "new incoming connection" is only printed when one of the two initial sockets close()
Why is this happening? Is this correct?
I implemented it with J2SE 1.3.1 in a windows NT 4 workstation machine.
Is this an Operating System problem? A TCP/IP problem? Is the problem in the java socket implementation? Is there any flaw in my code?
Thank you all in advance,
Filipe Fedalto

Hi, Chuck
It could also be the case.
Actually, I am implementing a proxy server. All the major work is done and were it not this accept() problem it would be functioning very well.
The server is running in my machine and I am testing it by issuing 4 simultaneous HTTP requests from Internet Explorer 5.5 from my own machine itself. So, you see, this could be the problem, according to what you've just said.
I try to open the 4 browser connections simultaneously, but the servers' accept() method only seems to receive 2 of them at a time.
What do you think about it?
Just in case, I will try and test it using Netscape. Let's see if the number of simultaneous connections change...
Notwithstanding, why do the browsers limit the number of concurrent connections? I might think that this is because it is better to open a single page or two faster than trying to open 5 or 6 pages slowly... is this the point?
Thank you very much!
Filipe Fedalto

What to set maximum simultaneous connection to?

Hello
What do I set maximum simultaneous connection to (web server settings)? In Apache manual you can calculate "maxClient" by taking the avaiable free RAM and split that with the memory each httpd process using. In my case that would be: 6000 / 15 = 400 maxClient.
But in Apples "Web tech admin" pdf they write: "...Browsers often request several parts of a webpage at the same time, and each request creates a connection". Does that really mean that every image need a separate connection – or have I missunderstand anything?
At the moment I have it set to the default 1024. But, CPU usage is very often in the 90-100% region… So, should I go by Apache's definition or Apples default?
Best regards, Magnus

You'll want to look at where the CPU time is going across everything that is going on, and at how much memory is in use; at a more holistic approach toward tuning. Unless you're getting a substantial load on Apache or unless you're very marginal on available memory, tweaking the maximum processes isn't usually a huge win.
If you are looking at comparatively large volumes of http traffic and that 90-100% CPU is largely web-related, then you'll want to profile the server using the Safari or other tools, and look at optimizations and at web caching, and potentially at adding web servers.
And yes, a web browser can have multiple parallel connections into a web server.
The maximum connections stuff sets up the numbers of Apache http client processes, which is why you're looking at memory with that discussion you've found.
Something similar to this command will get you the accumulated CPU time and the memory (rss) size for the Apache processes:
ps -A -o ucomm,rss,time | grep -i httpd
There are Apache tuning articles around the 'net, but I'd first make sure it's Apache that's soaking up the CPU time and not some other constraint.

LDAP max simultaneous connections

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for