LDOMS - virtual disks export mutiple times to different guest domains

Experts,
From control domain, can I export one storage LUN to two guest domains?
ldm add-vdsdev /dev/dsk/c1t5d0s0 disk1@primary-vds0
ldm add-vdisk disk1 disk1@primary-vds0 ldom1
Ok
ldm add-vdsdev /dev/dsk/c1t5d0s0 disk2@primary-vds0
Gives error. With –f flag it works.
ldm add-vdisk disk2 disk2@primary-vds0 ldom2
Is it permitted configuration?

A virtual disk back end can be exported multiple times either through the same or different virtual disk servers. Each exported instance of the virtual disk back end can then be assigned to either the same or different guest domains.
When a virtual disk back end is exported multiple times, it should not be exported with the exclusive (excl) option. Specifying the excl option will only allow exporting the back end once. The back end can be safely exported multiple times as a read-only device with the ro option.
chears
ME

Similar Messages

Cannot see more than one shared virtual disk at a time

I have multiple virtual disks configured and as I add them to the specific virtual machine im using it modifies the vm.cfg as follows:
disk = ['file:/OVS/running_pool/110_openfiler/System.img,hda,w',
',hdc:cdrom,r',
'file:/OVS/sharedDisk/openfiler-ocs-u01.img,hdd,w!',
'file:/OVS/sharedDisk/openfiler-ocs-u02.img,hde,w!',
'file:/OVS/sharedDisk/openfiler-SAN-test.img,hdf,w!',
when the machine boots up the contents of /dev only contains the shared drive hdd, thus I cannot see hde or hdf.
One thing I tried was to edit the vm.cfg after adding the shared drives to the machine to mimic:
disk = ['file:/OVS/running_pool/110_openfiler/System.img,hda,w',
',hdc:cdrom,r',
'file:/OVS/sharedDisk/openfiler-ocs-u01.img,sda,w!',
'file:/OVS/sharedDisk/openfiler-ocs-u02.img,sdb,w!',
'file:/OVS/sharedDisk/openfiler-SAN-test.img,sdc,w!',
This allows me to see all three drives when I issue fdisk -l
Disk /dev/hda: 105.2 GB, 105226698752 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 12793 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux
/dev/hda2 14 12539 100615095 83 Linux
/dev/hda3 12540 12793 2040255 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Disk /dev/sda: 20.9 GB, 20971520512 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 2549 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 1 2550 20480000 ee EFI GPT
Disk /dev/sdb: 20.9 GB, 20972569088 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 2549 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 1 2550 20481024 ee EFI GPT
Disk /dev/sdc: 104.8 GB, 104857600512 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 12748 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdc1 1 12749 102400000 ee EFI GPT
but then my question becomes... could this cause any potential problems?

I found that there are 4 IDE disks and 7 SCSI disks at most for HVM guest on Oracle VM 2.1 version. For IDE disks, The available disknames are from hda to hdd; and for SCSI disks, are from sda to sdg. you may make test about it. :)
Message was edited by:
Changhai

Problem when exporting a virtual disk backend twice

I have a t5140 server, with two 146G disks.
I have created 2 guest domains ,and want to install solaris for them.
Followed by the Logical Domains (LDoms) 1.0.3 Administration Guide , using the following command to export the second disk as a virtual disk backend multiple times:
ldm add-vdsdev /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s2 vdisk1@priamry-vds0
ldm add-vdsdev /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s2 vdisk2@primary-vds0
but it said:
Device /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s2 already used by another server in guest primary!

I have a t5140 server, with two 146G disks.
I have created 2 guest domains ,and want to install solaris for them.
Followed by the Logical Domains (LDoms) 1.0.3 Administration Guide , using the following command to export the second disk as a virtual disk backend multiple times:
ldm add-vdsdev /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s2 vdisk1@priamry-vds0
ldm add-vdsdev /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s2 vdisk2@primary-vds0
but it said:
Device /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s2 already used by another server in guest primary!

There is no more space for virtual disk ServerName_2.vmdk. You might be able to continue this session by freeing disk space on the relevant volume, and clicking Retry. Click Cancel to terminate this session.   Time: 30/05/2014 1:16:20 AM

Recently, our mail server crashed at about 7pm one night, with the error 'There is no more space for virtual disk ServerName_2.vmdk. You might be able to continue this session by freeing disk space on the relevant volume, and clicking Retry. Click Cancel to terminate this session.'
When we click Retry, the server starts up OK.
There are no snapshots listed in Snapshot manager for any of the virtual machines on the host.
There is also free disk space available on the host and for the VM with the disk errors.
This happened at least three more times, often at bad times. Each time, we were able to click 'Retry' and the disk/system would allow the VM to start-up successfully.
I checked the Forums, the VMware support articles and the internet as I had not seen this problem before. I have completed the VSphere 5.1 - Fast Track course and this issue was NOT covered in the training.
Most of the advice on-line and even that on the VMware web-site was pointing to snapshots being the cause of this issue. There are no snapshots enabled and I cannot see evidence of snapshots ever being used.
- We are running VMware vsphere (5.1.0) and there are (were) 4 virtual machines running on the ESX host. We are using the free version of VMware/ESXi.
- The Hard disk types we are using for this Virtual Machine are 'Thin Provisioned'.
- There are 4 [Thin Provisioned] Hard Disks for this virtual machine.
- There are 6 CPUs
- There is 20GB of RAM (memory)
- The VM is running Windows Server 2008 R2 as the guest/VM operating system. It is an Exchange 2010 SP1 mail server. There is plenty of available disk space on all the drives. The [Exchange] log files are cleaned out regularly (automated).
I decided to move one of our non-critical servers off this host and on to another host to see if this helped the problem. This took quite some time, as we are not using HA or vmotion, nor do we have VCenter Server...nonetheless, I finally managed to get the non-critical server on to another host (n.b. This was a much smaller machine with less virtual resources assigned to it).
After moving the non-critical server off this host, we decided to monitor the Host and see if the issue resolved itself.
I checked the host about 6-10 times a day, from first thing in the morning till last thing at night - monitoring the performance of not only the Virtual Machine, but the ESXi host also.
There were no adverse performance issues. The only thing I did note, was in the Summary page on the ESX Host, under Storage, was If I right-clicked on the datastore and clicked refresh, then the free disk space would drop (ie from 140GB to 125GB).
After monitoring the host and VM for about 2 weeks, we did NOT have another instance of the above error.
Sorry for the long winded post, but I wanted to give as much detail given this error has been raised before and snapshots are usually blamed as the cause.
My question is this:
If the ESX host had plenty of available disk capacity and there were no snapshots enabled on the VM (or any other VM's on the same host), then why did our Virtual machine crash with the error that 'there is not more space for virtual disk Servername_2.vmdk'?
How do we prevent this issue from happening if we don't know the underlying cause?
I would greatly appreciate any advice or suggestions.
If I have not provided enough info on the specs or environment, please let me know and I will provide more information.
Thanks all,
Kurt

The type of storage is really based on your requirements, and your ability to withstand downtime.
iSCSI as you are using with a NAS such as Synology or QNAP. NAS Selector - Support - Synology - Network Attached Storage (NAS)
I wouldn't use iSCSI for Exchange or any database. It's a bit slow.
Do you have a single physical host? Then I'd probably to an external direct attached storage. This would be a card inserted in your host server that gives you multilane SAS/SATA connectivity (www.techcable.com/SAS-SATA/SAS-SATA.pps) and an external disk enclosure/array.
For multiple hosts to a single array, I recommend a fibre channel connection to a FC capable switch, and on to a FC connected array.
We used to use a HP P2000 (on old G1), but it's since been retired. Worked pretty well once firmware was upgraded. http://www8.hp.com/us/en/products/disk-storage/product-detail.html?oid=4118559#!tab=features. They can be connected via iSCSI, Fibre Channel or 6GB SAS so they are flexible and reasonably priced.
Recommendations:
     Use RAID 6 with your large disk arrays. With large disks there is a measurable failure rate when rebuilding a failed RAID5 array based on MTBF.
     Use smaller 15K disks in RAID 0+1 for speed on databases/Exchange.
     Use slower 7.2K disks in RAID6 for file storage.
We are a small hospital and we have 3 VMware servers with dual CNA (FC and Ethernet in a single twinax cable) connections to 2 redundant Cisco Nexus 5K switches and then 4 Fibre Channel connections to an EMC VNX 5300. It's extremely fast with about 50 virtual servers, but was quite an investment. One thing we don't have to worry about is down time. If there ever is an equipment failure, we have redundant everything, including power split between two UPSs.
Our VNX has 3 tiers of performance. 3 100GB SSD "Fast Cache" in RAID 1 with hot spare, to keep the most used data ready, but it's not really a tier, however one could be built utilizing the same disks. A second tier is performance tier with a 8 600GB RAID 0+1 and hot spare. The third is a bunch of 7.2K 3TB disks in RAID6. The VNX autotiers, placing data on disks depending on where it's needed. The volumes are sliced and diced automatically in the background to make this happen and we never have to touch it. I used a demo of Solarwinds Storage Manager to monitor performance for a while and the utilization was always low, meaning all data access was fast, througout the day.
D

Error message:" Couldn't complete the command because the scratch disks are full" Ive try to fix this many times following different steps but none of them work and my disks equal to over 250GB. Please help.

. This error message pops up in Photoshop when i just wanna create a new plain white template. I have downloaded agentransack to track down the temp files and for some reason it says nothing matches the temp files.I have a couple of drives including 2 SSD's. I've try to fix this many times following different steps but none of them work and my disks equal to over 250GB. Please help. ( I am running windows 7 proffesional) 64 bit

Good day!
my disks equal to over 250GB.
What’s relevant is the space on the disk/s you have assigned as Scratch Disks – what are they (Phortoshop > Preferences > Performance > Scratch Disks)?
Regards,
Pfaffenbichler

Can system time be different in each LDOM?

We have a requirement to perform application testing which involves changing the system date/time to simulate batch runs at future dates. I understand that Solaris Zones can not have independent system times (although there has been an open RFE for almost 4 years)
Can this be achieved with LDOMs? ie, can you change the system time in one LDOM without affecting the others?
- Oliver.

Yes. Don't forget to stop the ntpd service if running. Short example on a guest domain :
# svcadm disable svc:/network/ntp:default
# date
Tuesday, January 29, 2008 5:34:38 PM MET
# date 2200
Tuesday, January 29, 2008 10:00:00 PM MET
# date
Tuesday, January 29, 2008 10:02:22 PM MET

Is there a way to combine two backups on separate disks created by time machine into one on a single disk?

Is there a way to combine two backups on separate disks created by time machine into one on a single disk? One backup is a continuation of the other and was created when I rec'd a message that the 1st disk was full. I'm using a iMac (late 2010) and both external drives are WD. Thanx.

With the timeline selected, go to File/Export/Movie and export each as a DV-AVI video.
You can then combine those AVIs into a new project with virtually no loss of quality.

Can Windows Server Backup spread a single backup job across multiple disks if they are not set up as a virtual disk?

This may be a dumb question, but I can't seem to find any definitive information after having done many, many searches. Short question is - can Windows Server Backup spread a single backup job across multiple disks if they are not in a storage
pool or some other RAID/JBOD structure?
Background:
I'm running Server 2012 Essentials with all Windows Updates installed. I have been backing up approx 2.8TB of data (Bare Metal Recovery, C:, S: (shared folders), and system reserved) for the past year+ onto a storage pool made up of two-2TB external
USB drives. Backup is slow (takes approx 1.5 days to complete), but generally works. Not surprisingly I was constantly getting capacity low messages so I decided to increase my backup storage pool by adding a 3TB drive and another spare 750GB drive
for a total of 7.75TB. Instead of having four separate external USB enclosures, I bot a 4-bay enclosure - Startech.com model #S3540BU33E to simplify this (or so I thought!).
The first problem I had was adding the two new drives to the existing storage pool. I think that is because the Startech uses a JMicron USB controller that reports identical uniqueid's for all drives so only one shows up in the GUI interface for creating storage
pools. After doing research on this, I set up a new storage pool and virtual disk using all four drives via Powershell and thought I was good. However, when the backup ran, it failed after filling the first drive, saying there was no remaining capacity. In
reality there were three remaining empty drives and there storage pool reported almost 5TB of avail capacity. I assumed this was due to the identical uniqueid issue so I decided to try a different tactic.
Instead of using a storage pool that combines all four disks into one virtual disk, I just added each of them to Windows Server Backup as individual drives thinking it would manage them collectively. I.e., when a drive filled up during a particular backup,
it would just start using the next drive and so on. Apparently this was a foolish assumption because the backup failed again as soon as the first disk filled up.
So now I don't know if this is still an issue with the identical uniqueid's or if Server Backup actually can't spread a single backup across multiple individual drives that aren't in a pool or other virtual disk implementation. Hence, my original question.
My guess is that it does *not* spread them across individual disks, but I just wanted to get confirmation.
Thanks

Mandy,
Thank you for following up on my question.
Unfortunately the article you referenced doesn't address what I am trying to accomplish.
The article focuses on saving the same backup job to multiple disks and rotating the disks between on and offsite for enhanced protection. However, it still requires that an individual backup job fits on a single disk.
What I am trying to determine is if a single backup job can span across more than one physical disk (during the backup process) without those physical disks being in some type of virtual disk implementation (e.g., storage pool, RAID, etc.).
Thanks,
Gerry

Unable to repair degraded Virtual disks in Storage Spaces under Hyper-V 2012 R2 Core

Hi all,
I am finding myself in the following conundrum. I have a storage pool under Hyper-V Core, with 2 2TB Seagate drives.
One of the drives completely died (wouldn't spin up, tried it in a different box, still to no avail). I sent it in to Seagate for warranty replacement, got the new drive. Installed it and went through the notions of adding it to the pool and retiring the
one that was with "Lost Communication" status.
Tried to repair the virtual disks that are showing as "Unhealthy-Detached", quickly get 100% complete, but the repair didnt work.
The storage pool is in degraded state.
Looks like metadata is corrupted.
Followed this post to upgrade Storage Spaces to latest version:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/eead59e9-5e49-4bb6-8cbb-1dafddd9576b/unable-to-repair-degraded-virtual-disks-in-storage-spaces-2012r2?forum=winserverfiles
Still, to no avail.
Couple of questions:
1) Is the data on the 3 virtual disks in state "Unhealthy: Detached" not recoverable?
2) How can I get the storage pool back to "healthy"?
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
PS C:\corefig> Get-PhysicalDisk | ? OperationalStatus -ne OK | fl
ObjectId : {1}\\HV001\root/Microsoft/Windows/Storage/Pr
oviders_v2\SPACES_PhysicalDisk.ObjectId="{95
42513c-a0d4-11e3-8123-806e6f6e6963}:PD:{7e22
245f-0cf6-11e3-b1db-806e6f6e6963}"
PassThroughClass :
PassThroughIds :
PassThroughNamespace :
PassThroughServer :
UniqueId :
AllocatedSize : 1218696970240
BusType : Unknown
CannotPoolReason : In a Pool
CanPool : False
Description :
DeviceId :
EnclosureNumber :
FirmwareVersion :
FriendlyName : PhysicalDisk-1
HealthStatus : Warning
IsIndicationEnabled :
IsPartial : False
LogicalSectorSize : 0
Manufacturer :
MediaType : UnSpecified
Model :
OperationalStatus : Lost Communication
OtherCannotPoolReasonDescription :
PartNumber :
PhysicalLocation :
PhysicalSectorSize : 0
SerialNumber :
Size : 1999575711744
SlotNumber :
SoftwareVersion :
SpindleSpeed : 0
SupportedUsages : {Auto-Select, Manual-Select, Hot Spare,
Retired...}
Usage : Retired
PSComputerName :
PS C:\corefig> get-physicaldisk
FriendlyName CanPool OperationalS HealthStatus Usage Size
tatus
PhysicalDisk4 False OK Healthy Auto-Select 73.75 GB
PhysicalDisk0 False OK Healthy Auto-Select 1.82 TB
PhysicalDi... False Lost Comm... Warning Retired 1.82 TB
PhysicalDisk2 False OK Healthy Auto-Select 930.75 GB
PhysicalDisk3 False OK Healthy Auto-Select 74.53 GB
PhysicalDisk1 False OK Healthy Auto-Select 1.82 TB
PS C:\corefig> get-virtualdisk -friendlyname 'Data' |FC
class CimInstance#ROOT/Microsoft/Windows/Storage/MSFT_VirtualDisk
ObjectId = {1}\\HV001\root/Microsoft/Windows/Storage/Providers_v2\SPACES_Virt
ualDisk.ObjectId="{9542513c-a0d4-11e3-8123-806e6f6e6963}:VD:{3debf056-01f1-11
e3-b1d6-001fbc081884}{7e2229cf-0cf6-11e3-b1db-001fbc081884}"
PassThroughClass =
PassThroughIds =
PassThroughNamespace =
PassThroughServer =
UniqueId = CF29227EF60CE311B1DB001FBC081884
Access = Read/Write
AllocatedSize = 548413636608
DetachedReason = Incomplete
FootprintOnPool = 1096827273216
FriendlyName = Data
HealthStatus = Unhealthy
Interleave = 262144
IsDeduplicationEnabled = False
IsEnclosureAware = False
IsManualAttach = False
IsSnapshot = False
LogicalSectorSize = 512
Name =
NameFormat =
NumberOfAvailableCopies =
NumberOfColumns = 1
NumberOfDataCopies = 2
OperationalStatus = Detached
OtherOperationalStatusDescription =
OtherUsageDescription =
ParityLayout = Unknown
PhysicalDiskRedundancy = 1
PhysicalSectorSize = 4096
ProvisioningType = Thin
RequestNoSinglePointOfFailure = False
ResiliencySettingName = Mirror
Size = 1099511627776
UniqueIdFormat = Vendor Specific
UniqueIdFormatDescription =
Usage = Other
WriteCacheSize = 0
PSComputerName =
PS C:\corefig> get-virtualdisk -friendlyname 'Backups' |FC
class CimInstance#ROOT/Microsoft/Windows/Storage/MSFT_VirtualDisk
ObjectId = {1}\\HV001\root/Microsoft/Windows/Storage/Providers_v2\SPACES_Virt
ualDisk.ObjectId="{9542513c-a0d4-11e3-8123-806e6f6e6963}:VD:{3debf056-01f1-11
e3-b1d6-001fbc081884}{7e22255e-0cf6-11e3-b1db-001fbc081884}"
PassThroughClass =
PassThroughIds =
PassThroughNamespace =
PassThroughServer =
UniqueId = 5E25227EF60CE311B1DB001FBC081884
Access = Read/Write
AllocatedSize = 743566213120
DetachedReason = Incomplete
FootprintOnPool = 1487132426240
FriendlyName = Backups
HealthStatus = Unhealthy
Interleave = 262144
IsDeduplicationEnabled = False
IsEnclosureAware = False
IsManualAttach = False
IsSnapshot = False
LogicalSectorSize = 512
Name =
NameFormat =
NumberOfAvailableCopies =
NumberOfColumns = 1
NumberOfDataCopies = 2
OperationalStatus = Detached
OtherOperationalStatusDescription =
OtherUsageDescription =
ParityLayout = Unknown
PhysicalDiskRedundancy = 1
PhysicalSectorSize = 4096
ProvisioningType = Thin
RequestNoSinglePointOfFailure = False
ResiliencySettingName = Mirror
Size = 1649267441664
UniqueIdFormat = Vendor Specific
UniqueIdFormatDescription =
Usage = Other
WriteCacheSize = 0
PSComputerName =
PS C:\corefig> get-virtualdisk -friendlyname 'Music' |FC
class CimInstance#ROOT/Microsoft/Windows/Storage/MSFT_VirtualDisk
ObjectId = {1}\\HV001\root/Microsoft/Windows/Storage/Providers_v2\SPACES_Virt
ualDisk.ObjectId="{9542513c-a0d4-11e3-8123-806e6f6e6963}:VD:{3debf056-01f1-11
e3-b1d6-001fbc081884}{7e2238b9-0cf6-11e3-b1db-001fbc081884}"
PassThroughClass =
PassThroughIds =
PassThroughNamespace =
PassThroughServer =
UniqueId = B938227EF60CE311B1DB001FBC081884
Access = Read/Write
AllocatedSize = 39728447488
DetachedReason = By Policy
FootprintOnPool = 79456894976
FriendlyName = Music
HealthStatus = Unknown
Interleave = 262144
IsDeduplicationEnabled = False
IsEnclosureAware = False
IsManualAttach = True
IsSnapshot = False
LogicalSectorSize = 512
Name =
NameFormat =
NumberOfAvailableCopies =
NumberOfColumns = 1
NumberOfDataCopies = 2
OperationalStatus = Detached
OtherOperationalStatusDescription =
OtherUsageDescription =
ParityLayout = Unknown
PhysicalDiskRedundancy = 1
PhysicalSectorSize = 4096
ProvisioningType = Thin
RequestNoSinglePointOfFailure = False
ResiliencySettingName = Mirror
Size = 161061273600
UniqueIdFormat = Vendor Specific
UniqueIdFormatDescription =
Usage = Other
WriteCacheSize = 0
PSComputerName =
PS C:\corefig> get-virtualdisk -friendlyname 'Videos' |FC
class CimInstance#ROOT/Microsoft/Windows/Storage/MSFT_VirtualDisk
ObjectId = {1}\\HV001\root/Microsoft/Windows/Storage/Providers_v2\SPACES_Virt
ualDisk.ObjectId="{9542513c-a0d4-11e3-8123-806e6f6e6963}:VD:{3debf056-01f1-11
e3-b1d6-001fbc081884}{7e2225bc-0cf6-11e3-b1db-001fbc081884}"
PassThroughClass =
PassThroughIds =
PassThroughNamespace =
PassThroughServer =
UniqueId = BC25227EF60CE311B1DB001FBC081884
Access = Read/Write
AllocatedSize = 223606734848
DetachedReason = Incomplete
FootprintOnPool = 447213469696
FriendlyName = Videos
HealthStatus = Unhealthy
Interleave = 262144
IsDeduplicationEnabled = False
IsEnclosureAware = False
IsManualAttach = False
IsSnapshot = False
LogicalSectorSize = 512
Name =
NameFormat =
NumberOfAvailableCopies =
NumberOfColumns = 1
NumberOfDataCopies = 2
OperationalStatus = Detached
OtherOperationalStatusDescription =
OtherUsageDescription =
ParityLayout = Unknown
PhysicalDiskRedundancy = 1
PhysicalSectorSize = 4096
ProvisioningType = Thin
RequestNoSinglePointOfFailure = False
ResiliencySettingName = Mirror
Size = 1759325978624
UniqueIdFormat = Vendor Specific
UniqueIdFormatDescription =
Usage = Other
WriteCacheSize = 0
PSComputerName =

Hi omon_77,
You can first refer the following step by step third party article and KB:
Replace Failed Disks and Repair JBODs for Storage Spaces in Windows Server
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn782852.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
Replacing a failed disk in Windows Server 2012 Storage Spaces with PowerShell
https://www.hodgkins.net.au/storage/replace-failed-disk-in-storage-spaces-pool-with-powershell/
Step By Step: How to Replace Faulty Disk In Two-Way Mirrored Storage Tiered Space
http://charbelnemnom.com/2014/09/step-by-step-how-to-replace-faulty-disk-in-two-way-mirrored-storage-tiered-space-storagespaces-ws2012r2/
More information:
Storage Spaces - Designing for Performance
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/15200.storage-spaces-designing-for-performance.aspx
Storage Spaces Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831739.aspx
Windows Server Storage Spaces: What is it and why should I use it?
http://curah.microsoft.com/5049/windows-server-2012-r2-storage-spaces-what-is-it-and-why-should-i-use-it
I’m glad to be of help to you!
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Storage Spaces: Virtual Disk taken offline during file copy, marked as "This disk is offline because it is out of capacity", but plenty of free space

Server 2012 RC. I'm using Storage Spaces, with two virtual disks across 23 underlying physical disks.
* First virtual disk is fixed provisioning, parity across 23 physical disks: 10,024GB capacity
* Second virtual disk is fixed provisioning, parity across the remaining space on 6 of the same physical disks: 652GB capacity
These have been configured as dynamic disks, with an NTFS volume spanned across the two (larger virtual disk first). Total volume size 10,676GB. For more details of the hardware, and why the configuration is like this, see: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserver8gen/thread/c35ff156-01a8-456a-9190-04c7bcfc048e
I'm copying several TB from a network share to this volume. It is very slow at ~12MB/sec, but works. However, three times so far, several hours in to the file copy and with plenty of free space remaining, the 10,024GB virtual disk is suddenly taken offline.
This obviously then fails the spanned volume and stops the file copy.
The second time, I took screenshots, below. The disk (Disk27) is marked offline due to "This disk is offline because it is out of capacity". And the disk in the spanned volume is marked as missing (which is what you would expect when one of its member disks
is offline).
I can then mark the disk (Disk27) back online again, and this restores the spanned volume. I can then re-start the file copy from where it failed. There doesn't appear to be any data loss, but it does cause an outage that requires manual attention. As you
can see, there is plenty of space left on the spanned volume.
Each time this has happened, there are a few event 150 errors in the System event log: "Disk 27 has reached a logical block provisioning permanent resource exhaustion condition.". Source: Disk.
- <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
- <System>
<Provider Name="disk" />
<EventID Qualifiers="49156">150</EventID>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>0</Task>
<Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2012-06-07T11:24:53.572101500Z" />
<EventRecordID>14476</EventRecordID>
<Channel>System</Channel>
<Computer>Trounce-Server2.trounce.corp</Computer>
<Security />
</System>
- <EventData>
<Data>\Device\Harddisk27\DR27</Data>
<Data>27</Data>
<Binary>000000000200300000000000960004C0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000</Binary>
</EventData>
</Event>
This error seems to be related to thin provisioning of disks. I found this:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/hh848068(v=vs.85).aspx. But both these Virtual Disks are configured as Fixed, not Thin provisioning, so it shouldn't apply.
My thoughts: the virtual disk should not spuriously go offline during a file copy, even if it was out of space. And in any case, there is plenty of free space remaining. Also, I don't understand the reason for why it is marked as offline ("This disk is offline
because it is out of capacity"). Why would a disk go offline because it was out of thin capacity, rather than just returning an "out of disk space" error while keeping it online.

Interesting Thread, I've been having the same issue. I had a failed hardware RAID that was impossible to recover in place, so after being forced to do a 1:1 backup, I find myself with 5 2TB hard drives to play with. Storage Spaces seemed like an interesting
way to go until I started facing the issues we share.
So my configuration is A VM Running Windows Server 2012 RC with 5 Virtualized Physical drives using a SCSI interface, 2TB in size that make up my storage pool. A Single Thinly provisioned Disk of 18 TB (using 1 disk for parity)
Interestly enough, write speed has not been an issue on this machine (30~70MB/s, up from 256k on the beta)
Of note to me is this error in my event log 13 minutes before the drive disappeared:
"The shadow copies of volume E: were deleted because the shadow copy storage could not grow in time.Consider reducing the IO load on the system or choose a shadow copy storage volume that is not being shadow copied."Source: volsnap, Event ID: 25, Level: Error
followed by:
"The system failed to flush data to the transaction log. Corruption may occur in VolumeId: E:, DeviceName: \Device\HarddiskVolume17.(The physical resources of this disk have been exhausted.)"Source: Ntfs (Microsoft-Windows-Ntfs), Event ID: 140, Level: Warning
I figure the amount of space available to me before I start encountering physical limits is in the vicinity of about 7TB. It dropped out for the second time at 184 GB.
FYI, the number of columns created for me is 5
Regards,
Steven Blom

Exporting Multiple Artboards of Different Formats Easily

I have one document with multiple artboards. I need to export each artboard with different formats and ppi. Is there a way I can do this quickly and efficiently without having to export each artboard individually? Thank you in advance for your time, insight, and help.

Thanks for the reply Wade.
It an unusual sitatution. I have a whole document created in illustrator. I'm handing it over to a client for them to work on in-house and they've requested an inDesign file. Ideally I'd like a way of exporting my ai file into an indd file. Haven't been able to find a way of doing this at the moment.

How do I disable "this connection is untrusted" I visit the same web site mutiple times in a day visit I get this same error, these are trusted sites within my work

How do I disable "this connection is untrusted" I visit the same web site mutiple times in a day and every visit I get this same dam error, these are trusted sites within my work environment. This is getting really old, and I am thinking that I should just uninstall, which is a pity becuase I do like firefox

Okay, before you copy 'n paste canned responses, you should read the post first.
'''The date & time on my computer is correct''' I've already checked this.
'''I don't give a damn why the site is untrusted''', I probably know why in fact (behind corporate proxy server).
As for exporting a known good certificate from another browser, sure good idea, but it doesn't seem to work. I tried exporting from IE, Firefox did the import without complaint, but it still complains. At any rate, I don't care about that. '''I just want to permanent disable it for ALL SITES for ALL TIME'''. Is that too much to ask for?
Judging by the number of posts on this topic, apparently I am not the only one complaining about this.

Virtual Disk used Size is Zero

Hi All,
Got a 3.0.2 test environment, 2 hosts with a seperate physical VM Manager box. Been creating Xen PVM guests using both a downloaded OL5U7 template to clone from as well as using network boot to extracted iso via ftp (also OL5U7).
For the clones, I noticed the virtual disk name defaults to a 32-character string while I could name the virtual disk for the network boot method. What's the best practise for organising this? Should I leave the Virtual Disk name blank so it defaults to a 32-character string like the cloned guests?
Also, in Homes > Server Pools > Repositories > Virtual Disks, the cloned guests are showing the correct virtual disk usage but for the guests created using network boot to iso is showing zero for disk usage. The only difference I see between the 2 types of guests is the giest created using the extrated iso is using lvm for the root partition.
Is there a way to refresh the ovm manager view such that the disk usage is accurate for the guests?
Thanks.

831583 wrote:
For the clones, I noticed the virtual disk name defaults to a 32-character string while I could name the virtual disk for the network boot method. What's the best practise for organising this? Should I leave the Virtual Disk name blank so it defaults to a 32-character string like the cloned guests?Up to you. The actual filename will always be the UUID. The Manager just allows you to name new disks for display in the Manager only.
Also, in Homes > Server Pools > Repositories > Virtual Disks, the cloned guests are showing the correct virtual disk usage but for the guests created using network boot to iso is showing zero for disk usage. The only difference I see between the 2 types of guests is the giest created using the extrated iso is using lvm for the root partition.Correct. For a Network Boot image, the initial disk usage is 0. This will increase over time as more content is stored inside the image.
Is there a way to refresh the ovm manager view such that the disk usage is accurate for the guests?Refresh the repository.

How to move a virtual disk's physical allocation within a Storage Pool

I have a pool of 3x500GB where one the physical drives is having intermittent issues. Currently, there is only one parity Virtual Disk of 300GB Fixed across 3 columns. I want to replace the bad drive with a good one. The old way (pre-2012) was replace the
disk, repair the RAID 5, resync and done. These basic steps are not working.
So far I have added a 4th 500GB drive to the pool. After searching and failing to find a way to move the data non-destructively, I decided to just pull the data cable on the disk I wanted to replace. After refresh/rescan, the disconnected drive shows "lost
communication" and the virtual disk (after trying to repair) shows "unknown" (but the volume on that disk is accessible in Explorer). When I try to remove the physical disk in Server Manager, I get "The selected physical disk cannot
be removed". Reading the error message, I see that the replacement disk cannot contain any part of a virtual disk. The replacement disk that I just added appears to have some space allocated (possibly because I have tried this same procedure a couple
of times already?). When I look at the parity disk properties/health, it shows all four physical disks under "physical disks in use".
I have deleted and recreated a lot of storage pools lately while trying to understand how they work but I would like to avoid that this time. The data on the virtual disk in question is highly deduplicated and it took quite a while to get it that way. Since
I can't find a way to copy/mirror the disk while keeping it fully deduplicated, I would need 3x the space to copy it all off, or a lot of time to load up and deduplicate a new virtual disk.
I have several questions:
1. How can a 3 column parity disk use parts of four physical disks? And can that be fixed without recreating the virtual disk?
2. When creating a virtual disk (for example a 3 column disk in a pool that has four or more physical drives), is there a way to specify which physical disks to use?
3. I understand that after a physical disk failure, the recovery process will move a virtual disk's allocation to a replacement disk, but can a virtual disk's allocation be moved manually among physical disks within the same storage pool
using a PS script?
4. Can a deduplicated virtual disk be moved/mirrored/backed up without expanding the data?
Any help is appreciated.

Im still fighting with storage pools and need more tests to be done and have a lot of questions my self but ther goes what I understood so far.
You may define physical disks used for virtual disk by Powershell ,
for list of all commands follow this:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh848705(v=wps.620).aspx ,
specific command defining physical disks to be used on already existing virtual disk:
Example 4: Manually assigning physical disks to a virtual disk
This example gets two physical disks that have already been added to the storage pool and designated as ManualSelect disks,
PhysicalDisk3 and PhysicalDisk4, and assigns them to the virtual disk
UserData.
PS C:\> Add-PhysicalDisk –VirtualDiskFriendlyName UserData –PhysicalDisks (Get-PhysicalDisk -FriendlyName PhysicalDisk3, PhysicalDisk4)
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh848702(v=wps.620).aspx
If You haven't seen this yet You may check it out http://blogs.technet.com/b/yungchou/archive/2011/12/06/free-ebooks.aspx

Oracle VM 3.1.1: Cloning virtual disks between local filesystems

Hi all,
Is it possible to clone virtual disk between two repositories where each repository is based on own local filesystem?
I receive an error when trying to do such clone in OVM Manager:
OVMAPI_7262E Unable to find an owned and running server to perform copy_file operation on +diskname+thanks in advance,
Miroslaw

You can clone disks between repositories, if both repositories are presented to at least one server at the same time.

LDOMS - virtual disks export mutiple times to different guest domains

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for