Lead time in Vendor Evaluation

Hi MM Gurus,
I want to add Replenishment Lead Time in Vendor Evaluation.Where from the lead time effects the scoring of a vendor in the vendor evaluation means the vendor evaluation also be based on Lead time?
Please give step by step procedure.....
Points will be awarded.

hi,
Lead time for processing u can mention in the Material master .
OR u can put it in inforecord also.
from that system will propose the planned delivery date in PO
with reference to this date and the actual GR posting date system will calculate the varience and gives points to the vendor.
i think if this is ur requirement then it is available in standard SAP functionality.
regards,
sujit

Similar Messages

How to influence lead time from vendors

Hi All,
I am trying to figure out how I can consider the impact of the Chinese New Year on the lead times of finished goods manufactured in China and sent to plants in the USA. I set up a special data range to account for this in the Calendar which was then assigned to the Time Stream ID.
My initial thought was to assign the Time Stream ID to the Shipping Calendar at the Vendor location (location master) but this does not seem to have made an impact on the lead time. I also tried using the Production Calendar, but this was also without success.
Does any have any recommendations that would assist me here.
Kind Regards,
Paul

Hi Paul,
If you are using APO PPDS means production planning heuristics from PPDS Scheduling will be done based on Planned delivery time in external procurement relationship. Planned deliver time will be considered based on production calender mentioned at vendor location.
You may be facing problem because transfer to R/3/ ECC will consider planned delivery time in calender days. Check your setting in CIF that you are not retransfering planning results from ECC back to APO.
For more information go through below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm50/helpdata/en/cd/6dec39554c7f58e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Santosh

Vendor Evaluation Index Recalculate

Dear Sir,
We have a scenario where we have already calculated Vendor Evaluation Score for a Vendor and saved it . Now we want to recalculated the score again as we have done some changes in the img setting . Kindly guide us how to go for score reclculation . Can simply running the tcode ME61 , recalculate the score and overwrite the already saved score .
Pl help us .
Regards
Sonia Agarwal

Hi.
Recalculate the scores by ME63 & not by ME61.
It is not possible to recalculate every time the vendor evaluation scores manually by ME63.
Create background job for this with T.code ME6G.
Regards,
Satpal

Perform VENDOR EVALUATION for MORE THAN ONE VENDORS at a time

Hello all,
Please guide for any process where i can perform Vendor Evaluation for MORE THAN ONE vendors AT A TIME.
At my location there are around thousand vendors, which are to be evaluated, and difficult to perform the evaluation process one-by-one.
(ME61/ME62/ME63)
Detailed replies with various possibilities would be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Joy Ghosh

The vendor evaluation for some thousand vendors at the same time has already been in SAP long before they developed LSMW. The purpose of LSMW is to load data from a legacy system, of course you can (mis-)use it for a lot other things.
But you should not always use LSMW if you are to lazy to go thru the SAP standard menu to find a transaction like ME6G
There you define a job that runs RM06LBAT report.
You first have to define a selection variant for this report. this can be done in SE38 by entering the report name, select variant, clicking display, then entering a name for the variant and clicking Create.

Vendor evaluation report for a definite time period

Hi Experts,
Vendor Evaluation Summary Report required for the vendors for a definite time period. Output of the report should show the scores of vendors for criteria like Price, Delivery, Quality, Service and summation of all these scores.
Please let me know if any standard report is available which can fulfill my requirement.
Thanks in advance.
Kishore.

Hi,
ME6H report is not fulfilling my requirement since i require the output format in the form like vendor, vendor name, plant, price, delivery, service, quality and the summation of scores given to these criterias.
Thanks
Kishore.

Vendor evaluation - main criterion : Delivery ; Sub criterion : On time del

hi
We have following requirement related to Vendor evaluation - main criterion : Delivery ; Sub criterion : On time delivery
The requirement is:
Deliveries late by 7 days should be considered as on time.
pl suggest

Hi Chintu,
Thanks for ur reply.
scores i have configured for qty.variance as,
2     Qty. reliability                      100
2     Qty. reliability     5.0-              90
2     Qty. reliability     10.0-      80
2     Qty. reliability     20.0-      75
2     Qty. reliability     40.0-      50
2     Qty. reliability     50.0-      40
2     Qty. reliability     75.0-      20
2     Qty. reliability     80.0-        1
My dought is, For on on-time delivery we are not maintaining any smoothing factor right?
So, Which smoothing factor we should consider for on-time delivery?
I have maintained smoothing factor for
Timeliness service - .20
Quantity Reliability - .30
Shipping Instructions - .25.
Thanks in Advance.
Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Nov 19, 2009 4:43 AM
Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Nov 19, 2009 8:25 AM
Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Dec 1, 2009 6:30 AM

Purchase requisition created only for the vendor lead time

Hello MRP experts,
I have a requirement that the purchase requisitions should be created by MRP only in the vendor lead time and rest of them should be in planned orders. Can this done and if so how. Thanks in Advance and due points will be awarded.

Hi,
As per my understanding there is no standard settings to achieve this requirement.
Regards,
Manish

Vendor Evaluation on time delivery criteria based on Month

Dear Gurus,
I have requirement that , in vendor evaluation the score calculation based on sub criteria on time delivery should not be on date basis , but need on period basis.
Ex. I am giving PO to Vendor and delivery date criteria is on month basis means whole month he can provide me material based on his capacity. date is not fixed.
can system score on the basis of period or it will be always on date basis, please guide me.
Thanks & Regards
Akshay

I don't think that you can have an individual scoring method for one vendor, so a change of customizing will affect all vendors.
A delivery date of an entire month would mean the last date of the month is the date in date field.
So you would need to setup your percentages so that 30 days early delivery are still get a 100 %

Vendor Evaluation related

Hi Experts
During vendor evaluation which program gets hit. particularly delivery date related. In the selection criteria the proposed delivery date is from PO creation date say if 5 days is the lead time, the PO creation date is 10.11.08 ,po release date is 11.11.08 and proposed delivery date is 15.10.08 and if the reciept date is 16.10.08 the delay is 1 day.
In my scenerio the system should consider po release date as the start date and not the po creation date.
Which tables get effected and which tables I have to change
Regards

Hi SAPMAN, the system uses the SIL for its calculation.
In case you need to extend the timeline you could use the Statistics-Relevant Delivery Date in Delivery Schedule tab, so the vendor wont get a bad scor due to your internal delay.
Regards.
Willy.

QM Settings for Vendor Evaluation

Hi All,
I am having a small issue with QM settings in Vendor Evaluation.
Actual Scenario - My client makes use of "Weighted Charateristics" instead of "Usage Decisions" and decides whether the material can be used or rejected etc at the time of Quality Inspection.
And, i believe that whatever the score or decision regarding the material was observed, it will be stored in a file with scores.
Now, the problem is Automatic Vendor Evaluation is simply giving a single score of 82 for whatever decision they make. Please try to address my following queries
1) Where the person responsible in QM needs to maintain the actual file with scores so that Vendor Evaluation can pick those scores for calculation?
2) Is there any configuration involved in either QM or Vendor Evaluation?
I came to know that all the configuration on the Vendor Evaluation side is OK
Thanks

In the MM side for QM criteria you have to make automatic only than rest will take by the QM module
see below
Complaints/Rejection Level
This subcriterion is used to evaluate whether the materials delivered by the vendor are regularly found to be faulty subsequent to incoming inspection (for example, on the shop-floor) leading to additional expense and loss of time (due to loss of production, reworking etc.).
The score (QM key quality figure) is calculated in QM Quality Management and the data passed on to MM Vendor Evaluation. This key quality figure is converted for use in the Vendor Evaluation scoring system.

Vendor evaluation - Price level

Hi,
pls can anybody help me to explain procedure how system calculating the sub criteria PRICE LEVEL, PRICE HISTORY , ONTIME DELIVERY,QTY RELIABILITY (Under main criteria PRICE,DELIVERY) in vendor evaluation process.
Possible give sample calculation.
Aparji

Price Level
This subcriterion compares relationship of a vendor's price to the market price. If the vendor's price is lower than the market price, he/she receives a good score; if it is higher than the market price he/she is assigned a poor score.
On the basis of the subcriterion "Price Level" you can compare a vendor's price to the current market price at a certain point in time.
Price History
This subcriterion compares the development of the vendor's price with the market price.
On the basis of the subcriterion "Price History", you can determine whether the vendor's price has increased or decreased over a certain period in comparison with changes in the market price over the same period.
Goods Receipt
This subcriterion is used to evaluate the quality of the material that the vendor delivers. Quality inspection takes place at the time of goods receipt.
Quality Audit
This subcriterion is used to evaluate the quality assurance system used by a company in manufacturing products.
Complaints/Rejection Level
This subcriterion is used to evaluate whether the materials delivered by the vendor are regularly found to be faulty subsequent to incoming inspection (for example, on the shop-floor) leading to additional expense and loss of time (due to loss of production, reworking etc.).
The score (QM key quality figure) is calculated in QM Quality Management and the data passed on to MM Vendor Evaluation. This key quality figure is converted for use in the Vendor Evaluation scoring system.
On-Time Delivery Performance
This subcriterion is used to determine how precisely a vendor has adhered to the specified delivery dates.
Quantity Reliability
This subcriterion is used to determine whether a vendor has delivered the quantity specified in the purchase order.
"On-Time Delivery Performance" and "Quantity Reliability" always have to be seen in conjunction. You can specify for each material (in the material master record) or for all materials (in the system settings) the minimum quantity of the ordered materials that must be delivered in order for a goods receipt to be included in the evaluation. This enables you to avoid a situation in which a punctual goods receipt involving only a small quantity of ordered materials is included in the evaluation with a good score for "On-Time Delivery Performance". If this minimum quantity is not delivered, the vendor is not awarded a score. However, in this case the vendor

Vendor Evaluation

Business Requires that for Vendor Evaluation, the scores to be at material level for the same vendor which means if they put the vendor number in the report parameter , the system will give them the vendor performance at material level .
Example :
Materials A and B were purchased 10 times from vendor 100001 so the system will give:
The on time delivery for Material A as 100 % ( if he did good performance )
The on time delivery for material B as 50% ( if he did bad performance ) ,they donu2019t want the system to give the on time delivery for both the material as 75% (100+50 )
The benefit of this is that SRS can find out another resources for the material with bad performance .
Any Thoughts on that?

Hi Tafanzas,
The Vendor Evaluation system actually collects data on material level and then accumulates it for display in e.g. trs ME65. The data are collected in LIS and you can run the analyses from there using trs ME6H.
BR
Raf

Purchase-How could I consider Transit time and lead time in imported mat.

My doubt refers about master data configuration of imported material.
My sittuation is :
Material - Lead Time: (depend on source)
Transit Time: (depend on source)
My company is responsable to transport all bought material. Besides, I can buy of differents suppliers.
Considering these rules, It s impossible to fix dates in material master, because material purchase is related with center and not with supplier. By the way, I need to discover other master data to configure it maybe : Inforecord, quotization... Whatever...
I need to correct this to generate Purchase order with dispatched date of my source against required date of my company after execute MRP.
I tried to study this scenario but until now I ve not got a solution.
Probably, you have had it before and can help me.
I hope your help!
Thank you!
Regards!

Create POs with respect to either PIRs (if you don't need to print out) or Contract/item, both of these are Vendor/material specific so you can set lead times accordingly . Probably best to use Source List and set requirement in material master too (Purchasing view).
Regards,
nick

Vendor Evaluation in Background

Dear Gurus,
For vendor evaluation in Back ground, Do i need to maintain weight keys? then where can i see the output report once after running vendor evaluation in background.
Please advice
Thanks
RS

Dear,
Weighting Key is an identifier under which weighting factors for a number of main criteria can be grouped together and saved. If you know that you want to carry out an evaluation with certain main criteria and certain weighting factors, you can save this combination under a weighting key.
When you carry out the next vendor evaluation, just enter the relevant weighting key instead of entering a weighting factor for each individual criterion. The stardard two keys available are 01, 02.
If you do not have the weighting key, use the possible entries facility.
Next, in the background processing, usually evaluate vendors belonging to the same group (that is, vendors who have the weighting key). However, it is possible that you have selected an interval that contains different groups of vendors. For this reason, you may not enter a Weighting Key.
However the evaluation with weighting keys are preferred (basing on your organizations requirements and client performance, these may not be required). If you have enough time and interested to review the subject please have a look at: http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf?bcsi_scan_DAD819A53026B58E=0&bcsi_scan_filename=MMISVE.pdf
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score

Dear Friends,
I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
Regards,
Saurav

Dear Friend,
Kindly go through the below documents,
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

Lead time in Vendor Evaluation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for