Left outer join on linked server

Hi,
I am migrating large amounts of data from Oracle database to SQL Server database, through a linked server.
When I use LEFT JOIN, the SQL server execution plan shows that the query that merges tables is not executed remotely (i.e. the data from both tables that I am trying to join is fetched on SQL server and joined on SQL server instead of being joined on Oracle and fetched after that), while queries using INNER JOIN fully execute on the remote server. I am trying to join remote Oracle database tables and the result of the join is supposed to be populated in a local table.This LEFT JOIN issue significantly enlarges the amount of a query execution time.
Can someone explain why is this so and suggest a solution? I tried using OPENQUERY but the results are not fetched properly because of the collation.
Thanks in advance!

with t1 as (
            select 1 id,to_date('1-Jan-12','dd-mon-rr') dateA from dual union all
            select 1,to_date('1-Feb-12','dd-mon-rr') from dual union all
            select 1,to_date('1-Mar-12','dd-mon-rr') from dual union all
            select 2,to_date('1-Feb-12','dd-mon-rr') from dual union all
            select 2,to_date('1-Mar-12','dd-mon-rr') from dual union all
            select 2,to_date('1-Apr-12','dd-mon-rr') from dual
     t2 as (
            select 1 id,to_date('1-Feb-12','dd-mon-rr') dateB,'a' valB from dual union all
            select 1,to_date('1-Mar-12','dd-mon-rr'),'b' from dual union all
            select 2,to_date('1-Feb-12','dd-mon-rr'),'c' from dual union all
            select 2,to_date('1-Mar-12','dd-mon-rr'),'d' from dual
select  t1.id,
        dateA,
        max(dateB) dateB,
        max(valB) keep(dense_rank last order by dateB) valB
  from      t1
        left join
            t2
          on     t2.id = t1.id
             and
                 dateB <= dateA
  group by t1.id,
           dateA
  order by id,
           dateA
        ID DATEA     DATEB     V
         1 01-JAN-12
         1 01-FEB-12 01-FEB-12 a
         1 01-MAR-12 01-MAR-12 b
         2 01-FEB-12 01-FEB-12 c
         2 01-MAR-12 01-MAR-12 d
         2 01-APR-12 01-MAR-12 d
6 rows selected.
SQL> SY.

Similar Messages

  • SQL Server "LEFT OUTER JOIN" syntax

    Haven't seen a solution to this on the forum or in the docs.
    I've got 2 objects, Task and Role, that are linked in a M-M relationship.
    My tables are:
    T_TASKS
    T_TASKSROLES
    T_ROLES
    I am querying T_TASKS and joining on T_ROLES, but I need to use an outer join on T_ROLES.
    In SQL Server, my FROM clause SHOULD look like this:
    FROM (T_TASKSROLES t2 LEFT OUTER JOIN T_TASKS t1 ON t1.ID = t2.TASKID) LEFT OUTER JOIN T_ROLES t0 ON t0.ID = t2.ROLEID
    however, if I use eb.anyOfAllowingNone(_roles) in my ExpressionBuilder. TopLink creates a LEFT OUTER JOIN clause that looks like this:
    FROM T_ROLES t0 LEFT OUTER JOIN T_TASKS t1 ON ((t0.ID = T_TASKSROLES.ROLEID) AND (t1.ID = T_TASKSROLES.TASKID))
    I can see the logic in how it builds this clause. But, it doesn't parse in SQL Server.
    Is there a way to effect how TopLink generates the FROM clause for outer joins? I mean, I understand how to use the XXXPlatform.java source files and can change whether to use OuterJoin in the WHERE clause or not. But, I can't see anything in the platform class that would allow me to figure this out.
    I realize I could write SQL manually, but is there a way to do this so that the same code would work on SQL Server, Oracle, and Sybase (assuming the DatabaseLogin is configured appropriately)?
    It just seems like LEFT OUTER JOIN when joining M-M relationships isn't generating proper SQL. Is the TopLink SQL SQL92-compliant?
    Nate

    I should add that I have tried to change SQLServerPlatform to have shouldPrintOuterJoinInWhereClause() return "true". This embeds a "=*" in the join conditions in the WHERE clause.
    SQL Server 2000 still supports this syntax, but the "=*" isn't ALWAYS the correct operator. It is IMPORTANT to put the "*" on the correct side of the expression.
    TopLink always prints "=*", and it always puts it in the correct space, but the OPERATORS are not always in the correct order so you are creating a "left join" on the wrong table.
    So my other question, is it possible to FORCE TopLink to remember to put the outer join table in the RIGHT SIDE?
    Nate

  • Restriction to Left Outer Joins in PS Query

    Hello I am trying to do Left Outer JOin in PS QUERY. I need to do dept tbl, job code tbl and locatable as left outer joins with JOB Table. Looks like in PS QUERY there is a error message saying as below. Can someone has any workaround to achieve this in PS QUERY. I know I can create a View and use that in PS QUERY but BUsiness Users are dependent on IT, so that doesn't work. Also, adding JOB table multiple times works but I am looking for better solution if anyone had come accorss working through PS QUERY Outer JOins.
    Windows Internet Explorer
    Left outer joins must be joined to the last record in the query. (139,290)
    OK
    Thanks,
    SC.

    Hi Mike,
    According to your description, you want to improve the performance for your DAX query in SQL Server Analysis Service Tabular model, right? Here is a white paper describes strategies and specific techniques for getting the best performance from your tabular
    models, including processing and partitioning strategies, DAX query tuning, and server tuning for specific workloads.
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn393915.aspx
    Since this is a complex DAX query, from a support perspective this is really beyond what we can do here in the forums. If you cannot determine your answer here or on your own, consider opening a support case with Microsoft. Visit this link to see the various
    support options that are available to better meet your needs:
    http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?id=fh;en-us;offerprophone
    Regards,
    Charlie Liao
    TechNet Community Support

  • LEFT OUTER JOIN SQL syntax

    Haven't seen a solution to this on the forum or in the docs. My last post timed out with no responses, but I still don't know if I have a possible solution.
    I've got 2 objects, Task and Role, that are linked in a M-M relationship.
    My tables are:
    T_TASKS
    T_TASKSROLES
    T_ROLES
    I am querying T_TASKS and joining on T_TASKSROLES and T_ROLES, but I need to use an outer join because not all Tasks have a Role in T_TASKSROLES.
    In SQL Server, my FROM clause SHOULD look like this:
    FROM (T_TASKSROLES t2 LEFT OUTER JOIN T_TASKS t1 ON t1.ID = t2.TASKID) LEFT OUTER JOIN T_ROLES t0 ON t0.ID = t2.ROLEID
    however, if I use eb.anyOfAllowingNone(_roles) in my ExpressionBuilder. TopLink creates a LEFT OUTER JOIN clause that looks like this:
    FROM T_ROLES t0 LEFT OUTER JOIN T_TASKS t1 ON((t0.ID = T_TASKSROLES.ROLEID) AND (t1.ID = T_TASKSROLES.TASKID))
    I can see the logic in how it builds this clause. But, it doesn't parse in SQL Server.
    Is there a way to effect how TopLink generates the FROM clause for outer joins? I mean, I understand how to use the XXXPlatform.java source files and can change whether to use OuterJoin in the WHERE clause or not. But, I can't see anything in the platform class that would allow me to figure this out.
    I realize I could write SQL manually, but is there a way to do this so that the same code would work on SQL Server, Oracle, and Sybase (assuming the DatabaseLogin is configured appropriately)?
    It just seems like LEFT OUTER JOIN when joining M-M relationships isn't generating proper SQL. Is the TopLink SQL SQL92-compliant?
    I should add that I have tried to change SQLServerPlatform to have shouldPrintOuterJoinInWhereClause() return "true". This embeds a "=*" in the join conditions in the WHERE clause.
    SQL Server 2000 still supports this syntax, but the "=*" isn't ALWAYS the correct operator. It is important to put the "*" on the correct side of the expression. TopLink always prints "=*", but the operators are not always in the correct order. So, it tries to create a "left join" on the wrong table.
    So my other question, is it possible to force TopLink to remember to put the outer join table in the RIGHT SIDE?
    Nate

    The workaround is actually more complicated than that, and it can't be fixed by changing only the operator.
    In the queries you listed, the only difference is which side of the "AND" the expressions appear on.
    Change "(t2.rightid (+)= t1.rightid)" to "(t1.rightid (+)= t2.rightid)" and I'm guessing (although not sure because I am testing with SQL Server at the moment), that you'll get a similar query error as I did.
    The bug here is that the default M-M selection criteria creates "reltable = table1 AND table2 = reltable". There is no operator that can satisfy this expression.
    So, the fix that I made, for all of my M-M Mappings was to set the SelectionCriteria manually using the following Expression (returned from this method):
    // This puts M-M relationship tables on the same side of expressions so that OUTER JOINS can be supported.
    private Expression getSameSideExpression() {
              // target side
              Expression selectionCriteria = null;
    Enumeration e2 = getTargetKeyFields().elements();
    Enumeration e = getTargetRelationKeyFields().elements();
    ExpressionBuilder eb = new ExpressionBuilder();
    Expression relTableExp = null;
    while(e2.hasMoreElements()) {
    DatabaseField df = (DatabaseField) e.nextElement();
    DatabaseField df2 = (DatabaseField) e2.nextElement();
    if(relTableExp == null){
    relTableExp = eb.getTable(df.getTable());
    Expression targetFieldExp = eb.getField(df2);
    Expression relFieldExp = relTableExp.getField(df);
    Expression joinExp = relFieldExp.equal(targetFieldExp);
    if(selectionCriteria == null)
    selectionCriteria = joinExp;
    else
    selectionCriteria = joinExp.and(selectionCriteria);
              // source side
    e = getSourceRelationKeyFields().elements();
              e2 = getSourceKeyFields().elements();
    while(e.hasMoreElements()) {
    DatabaseField df = (DatabaseField) e.nextElement();
    DatabaseField df2 = (DatabaseField) e2.nextElement();
    Expression relFieldExp = relTableExp.getField(df);
    Expression sourceFieldExp = eb.getParameter(df2);
    Expression joinExp = relFieldExp.equal(sourceFieldExp);
    if(selectionCriteria == null)
                        selectionCriteria = joinExp;
    else
    selectionCriteria = joinExp.and(selectionCriteria);
              return selectionCriteria;
    This changes the M-M Selection Criteria to "table1 = reltable AND table2 = reltable". Now that this is consistent, using the WHERE clause for my joins in SQL Server is possible.
    If you can think of any other problems this change may have, please let me know.
    Thanks for the help.
    Nate

  • Crystal Report with 2 oracle datasources (left outer join) very slow

    I've made a crystal report with 2 oracle datasources (2 commands). I'm using crystal 10.
    These 2 data sources are linked with a left outer join.
    The report takes a while to run (more then one hour).
    i can run Both query's in a couple of seconds/minutes, but it looks like crystal is runniing the second query for each record in the first query.
    When i make the same report in BO. Just 2 queries with merged dimensions in the report, it is taking a couple of minutes to complete the report.
    Question is if somebody knows how crystal is handling these 2 different data sources.
    Is there any way to say to crystal to fetch the data of both queries and do the join after that?
    At the moment it looks like that crystal is going to the other datasource for each record in the first query, which will cost a lot of time.

    Joris,
    I've always had a bad time combining a Command with any other object. Performance seems to drop dramatically, just as you've described.
    I can't tell you specifically why, it falls off so bad...
    The solution I've used is to do a linked  server query (at least that's what it's called in MS SQL Server) I've never used Oracle, but I'd be VERY surprised if it didn't have that same feature. This will keep 100% of the processing on the server(s) and will get your run times back to what you would expect.
    HTH,
    Jason

  • BI 7.0 Infoset - Infocube - Left outer join - query

    Hi Expert,
    A infoset contain Infocube and ODS, linked with left outer join, common fields are PO,PO item.  PO account assignment ODS have three keyfields: PO Doc.,Item,account Assignment  .
         PO  Infocube                                     <b>PO Account Assignment ODS</b>
    PO       PO item  Amt<b>PO Doc.  Item   AccAssignment         Cost object</b>
    1000    10            230  <b>1000       10        1                          CC1</b>
    1001    10            250  <b>1002       10        1                          CC1</b>
    1002    10            150  <b>1002       10        2                          CC2</b>
    in BEx result are like this:    
    1000    10            230      1     CC1
    1001    10            250      #      #
    1002    10            150      1     CC1
    1002    10            150      2     CC2 ( amount only duplicated)
    The issue was that amount gets duplicated. It only occurs if PO has more than one account assignment.
    In report, we want show like this
    1000    10            230       1       CC1
    1001    10            250       #        #
    1002    10            150       1       CC1
    1002    10            #        2       CC2
    Any suggestion or input to overcome this issue?
    Thanks,
    Saran
    Message was edited by:
            Saravanan K

    Hi,
    did you solve your problem? because I have the same issue right now: the left outer join doesn't seem to do its job.
    Let me know if you have found a solution, it would be appreciated.
    have a nice day,
    Dominic

  • Need to adjust SQL query for left outer join in Crystal Reports 2008.

    I need to change this SQL 2005 query.....
    SELECT     omnicell_anl.DeviceIDsLastMetricTable.member_id, omnicell_anl.DeviceIDsLastMetricTable.[Device Name],
                          omnicell_anl.DeviceIDsLastMetricTable.Account, omnicell_anl.labeledLastMetrics.PROPERTY_NAME,
                          omnicell_anl.labeledLastMetrics.latest_monitor_value
    FROM         omnicell_anl.DeviceIDsLastMetricTable LEFT OUTER JOIN
                          omnicell_anl.labeledLastMetrics ON omnicell_anl.DeviceIDsLastMetricTable.member_id = omnicell_anl.labeledLastMetrics.member_id
    WHERE
        omnicell_anl.labeledLastMetrics.PROPERTY_NAME = ?MyProperty
    To this query in Crystal Reports Report Writer:
    SELECT     omnicell_anl.DeviceIDsLastMetricTable.member_id, omnicell_anl.DeviceIDsLastMetricTable.[Device Name],
                          omnicell_anl.DeviceIDsLastMetricTable.Account, omnicell_anl.labeledLastMetrics.PROPERTY_NAME,
                          omnicell_anl.labeledLastMetrics.latest_monitor_value
    FROM         omnicell_anl.DeviceIDsLastMetricTable LEFT OUTER JOIN
                          omnicell_anl.labeledLastMetrics ON omnicell_anl.DeviceIDsLastMetricTable.member_id = omnicell_anl.labeledLastMetrics.member_id AND
                          omnicell_anl.labeledLastMetrics.PROPERTY_NAME = ?MyProperty
    I can't seem to get the left outer join function of Crystal Reports to emulate the same SQL query in SQL 2005.  Any ideas on how I can create this same query in Crystal 2008?
    Thanks,
    Dominic
    Edited by: Dominic Carissimi on Oct 28, 2008 7:55 PM
    Edited by: Dominic Carissimi on Oct 28, 2008 7:56 PM

    If you want the list of values for command level parameter then you need to add another command like
    select PropertyField from table
    and delete the links between this command and the existing command.
    Now go to field explorer and edit the command level parameter and make it as dynamic and add the property field from newly added command.
    Hope this helps!
    Raghavendra

  • Left Outer Join with more than two tables in both CR 8.5 and XIR2

    I am trying to create a report and I have tried two versions of Crystal but I ultimately need the report in CR8.5 for compatibility with the client's system.  I think I am starting to figure out what might be wrong and it might be my understanding of SQL, but I can't see why someone hasn't needed this in the past. Ultimately I want to see all projects and any journal entry that might be posted for that project.
    Database is MySQL 5.0.38 and using MySQL ODBC driver 3.51.19.
    Project header table information will be populated. Each line item on a journal entry can be tagged with the project ID. But for me to pull the journal entry date I need also to link to a third table for the journal entry header info.
    I want to see all projects, whether a journal entry has been posted or not.
    So the links are like this
    ProjectHeader --->Left Outer Join ---> JELines ---> Inner Join ---> JEHeader
    I think in this scenerio Crystal is treating the LOJ as an IJ.
    I created two brand new reports today, one in CR8.5 and one in CR XIR2. Once I edited the automatic CR8.5 SQL statement (which I have been doing for years, usually without problem), they both ran properly. I linked customers to their invoices. Customers without invoices showed properly. But then I linked the invoices to the payments of the invoices and immediately lost customers without orders in both reports.
    So apparently only two tables are allowed in Outer Joins. Does this make sense?  I checked out the w3schools tutorial on SQL and it doesn't mention this limitation and I can't find anywhere else that it specifically indicates this but all samples of code I have seen only show two tables.  I just thought for presentation as a sample that was easiest to understand and we could expand as necessary.
    If this is correct, how does one go about accounting for this kind of thing?  One solution that goes through my mind is creating a view at the database level for the link between journal entry lines and journal entry headers.  Would this be a good solution under normal circumstances?
    A second option that I had to implement because of timelines, is to use a subreport linked to the main report through the project ID to pull the information for the journal entries and just pass the totals I need to the main report through a shared variable.
    These aren't normal circumstances because I don't have access to the database so I can't create the view.  I have come across this concept several times and I have been able to use subreports to solve it but I am trying to find a better solution for the future as sometimes subreports can be slow.  So are there any alternatives I have not considered here?
    TIA rasinc

    So after some more work and another post.  I was able to get this to work.
    Items disappear when linking to another table
    My issues were two fold.  I was selecting on the tables on the right-side of the original Inner Join.  However, I was checking for Nulls.  This apparently is correct but you must check for the Nulls first eg. (IsNull (JEHeader.Field1) OR JEHeader.Field1 <= 100).  I had my original statement reversed checking for <= 100 before checking for Nulls.
    I also did not set all links to be Left Outer Join.  I had the Inner Join.  I actually have about 6 tables in this report so all the links need to be set Outer Join.  So this now seems to be corrected.
    Thanks

  • Left outer join problem -- need feedback

    using crystal 2008
    haveing prolbems with a left outerjoin to get a blank field(null) to show up.
    basically i have some po line have have long descriptions or text fields that i want to include with the report. Below is my sql statement. I have written a formula with a join between 2 fields to get the report to work- this does but- it leave the polines off that do not have a long description.  I have tried left outer joins but seem to be having problems.  The long description field where the data is actually at is under my po.line table, although serveral area have long description fields -
    *one note i had to add a duplicate table to the field to get some items in my header to work properly - not sure if this is effecting the report or not.
    OK- when I set up the link to a LO join enforce from = to
    and dont add the ldtext.field to the report the left outjoin works(but no long description)and all my line items show up.
    1. when I keep the same join and add either just the ld.text field to  the report it comes back with a error saying invalid table
    2. when i use my formula that joins the ld.text and po.line and place it in the report with the same left outerjoin i get the same failure.
    3.  when i dont reference the ldtext(field) at all in the report it works fine w/ the lo join
    4. when i Dont use a left outer join and use my formula(see below)
    if not isnull(({LONGDESCRIPTION.LDTEXT }))
    then {POLINE.DESCRIPTION}+{LONGDESCRIPTION.LDTEXT}
    else {POLINE.DESCRIPTION}
    and link from poline.ld
    to ld.ldtext - my formula works and populates the po.line and the ld.text together - except that any po.line with no description will not show up. Like its not there.
    Not sure what to do?
    here is my current sql statement with the longdescription field in the select statement
    here is the error statement i am getting:
    Failed to retrieve data from the database:
    Details:42000[intersolv][odb sql base driver][sql base] 00906 itn invalid table name[database vendor code:906]
    sql statement:
    SELECT "PO"."PONUM", "PO"."STATUS", "PO"."VENDOR",
    "COMPANIES"."NAME", "COMPANIES"."ADDRESS1",
    "COMPANIES"."ADDRESS2", "COMPANIES"."ADDRESS3",
    "COMPANIES"."ADDRESS4", "COMPANIES"."PHONE",
    "COMPANIES"."FAX", "COMPANIES_1"."NAME",
    "COMPANIES_1"."ADDRESS1", "COMPANIES_1"."ADDRESS2",
    "COMPANIES_1"."ADDRESS3", "COMPANIES_1"."ADDRESS4",
    "COMPANIES_1"."CONTACT", "COMPANIES_1"."PHONE",
    "COMPANIES_1"."FAX", "PO"."PURCHASEAGENT",
    "PO"."ORDERDATE",
    "PO"."REQUIREDDATE", "PO"."PAYMENTTERMS",
    "PO"."SHIPVIA", "PO"."FREIGHTTERMS", "PO"."FOB",
    "POLINE"."DESCRIPTION", "POLINE"."ITEMNUM",
    "POLINE"."ORDERQTY", "POLINE"."UNITCOST",
    "POLINE"."LOADEDCOST", "POLINE"."POLINENUM",
    "PO"."SHIPTOATTN", "LONGDESCRIPTION"."LDTEXT"
    FROM   ("MAXIMO"."PO" "PO" LEFT OUTER JOIN
    "MAXIMO"."LONGDESCRIPTION" "LONGDESCRIPTION" ON "PO"."LDKEY"="LONGDESCRIPTION"."LDKEY"),
    "MAXIMO"."POLINE" "POLINE",
    "MAXIMO"."COMPANIES" "COMPANIES_1",
    "MAXIMO"."COMPANIES" "COMPANIES"
    WHERE  ("PO"."PONUM"="POLINE"."PONUM") AND ("PO"."VENDOR"="COMPANIES_1"."COMPANY") AND ("PO"."SHIPTO"="COMPANIES"."COMPANY") AND "PO"."PONUM"='3386-053'

    If you took the time to read this thanks.... turns out... and I just want to pull my hair out over this.  My connection had a  old odbc driver so somehow it would not allow a left outer join....go figure - weeks of agony over that..... thanks ....have to say love this forum.

  • Left Outer Join not working in Infoset.

    Hello Friends,
    I have two ODSes , one for planned data (zplan) and other is billing z ods (zsd_o03).
    now the situation is such that in my planned ODS  for one sold to party .
    SOLD TO        MATERRIAL CALMONT     PLANNED QUANTIY
    14315            100                06.2007           54
    14315            200                06.2007           20
    14315            300                06.2007           30
    14315            400                06.2007           10
    But in my Billing ODS iam having for Sold to 14315
    SOLD TO        MATERRIAL CALMONT     ACTUAL QUANTIY
    14315           100           06.2007                  20
    14315           200           06.2007                  30
    And my Bex ouput should be like
    SOLD TO        MATERIAL CALMONT        planned             ACTUAL QUANTIY
    14315            100                06.2007           54                                 20
    14315            200                06.2007           20                                30
    14315            300                06.2007           30                                  0
    14315            400                06.2007           10                                0
    So for this i made one Infoset and these ODses are linked by Sold_to , Materail,
    Calmonth.
    First i tried using Inner joing option , but the bottom two lines were not ciming , so used left outer join , and activated and recreated the query but still its showiong me the output same as inner join .. i.e
    14315            100                06.2007           54                                 20
    14315            200                06.2007           20                                30
    So i checked by writing a ABAP code in Se38 , but there its showing me the correct result ..
    So please anybody help me out because iam thinking that infoset is the right way to do this kind of reporting , or esle shall i make one ODS and populate it through this ABAP code..
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi , can anybody help me in this regard..
    Thanks ..

  • Using Left Outer Join

    Hi SAP,
    I have an access database with table called "Employee_ID".  I am linking this table to a table called "Sales" in our main database and trying to report on January 2009.
    There is one employee that is not appearing in my report.  I know this employee has had no sales in Jan 2009.  So, I tried linking the table using Left Outer Join and still this employee is not appearing in my report.
    As a test, when I bring in Employee_ID table alone, the missing employee appears but when I try linking it INNER or LEFT OUTER join to table Sales, this employee does not appear.
    Any help how I can bring the employee in from table Employee_ID?
    Many thanks in advance,
    Zack H.

    Carl & Raghavendra,
    Your suggestion led me to the finding my solution.  Your suggestion brought back the missing employee but I needed all employees that had sales in January 2009 AND those that didn't.  So I had to tweak your select expert formula as follows:
    isnull({Sales.amt}) or
    {Sales.period}="0109"
    This brought back everything as needed!  There was one negative about using this method.  The performance was poor.  It took a really long time to run.
    To avoid having to wait for this to run and increase the performance, I had to go into the database and add a $0.00 sales amt for employee 2040 (or an empty sales amount record) in the month of January 2009.  This brought back everyone also and it obviously increased the performance exponentially.  Curious, why does it take forever to run using the above formula in select expert?
    Thank you both Raghavendra and Carl for your relentless efforts to find a solution.  You did it!
    Zack H.

  • Left outer join query

    Hi Experts,
        I am facing a problem with left outer join query. Am using one standard table and ztable for this join. My problem is values are not extracted from the Ztable.
    Query:
          SELECT  b~lifnr b~belnr b~gjahr b~xblnr b~shkzg b~blart b~zfbdt b~budat b~wrbtr
             b~wskto b~zlspr s~EXTRACT_STATUS s~maturity_date FROM bsik AS b
             LEFT OUTER JOIN zprm_rvne_sapdoc AS s
             ON s~belnr  EQ  b~belnr
             AND s~gjahr EQ b~gjahr
             INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_join
                WHERE b~zlsch = p_zlsch
                AND b~xblnr IN so_invno
                ORDER BY b~lifnr b~xblnr.
    I have all entries of BSIK table in Ztable with extract status as Y but this query is not fetching extract status and maturity date of ztable so it is blank in the internal table.
    Need solution.
    Regards
    Sridevi S

    Hi,
    see the sample wiki for writing the Left outer join
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Snippets/EmployeeInfotype0000to9999ChangeHistory
    Specifying Two or More Database Tables as a Left Outer Join
    The left outer join, on the other hand, reads lines from the left-hand database table or join even if there is no corresponding line in the right-hand table.
    SELECT...
      FROM <tab> LEFT [OUTER] JOIN <dbtab> [AS <alias>] ON <cond>
           <options>
    <tab> and <dbtab> are subject to the same rules and conditions as in an inner join. The OUTER addition is optional. The tables are linked in the same way as the inner join with the one exception that all lines selected from <tab> are included in the final selection. If <dbtab> does not contain any lines that meet the condition <cond>, the system includes a single line in the selection whose columns from <dbtab> are filled with null values.
    In the left outer join, more restrictions apply to the condition <cond> than in the inner join. In addition to the above restrictions:
    EQ or = is the only permitted relational operator.
    There must be at least one comparison between columns from <tab> and <dbtab>.
    The WHERE clause may not contain any comparisons with columns from <dbtab>. All comparisons using columns from <dbtab> must appear in the condition <cond>.
    If we have two tables named stud1,stud2 with the following data
    Stud1: id Name stud2: id Name
    1 xxx 1 aaa
    2 yyy 2 bbb
    3 zzz 4 ccc
    4 www 6 ddd
    When we use Left Outer Join we get the output as:
    1 aaa
    2 bbb
    3 <Null>
    4 ccc
    When we use Right Outer Join we get the output as:
    1 aaa
    2 bbb
    4 ccc
    <Null> ddd
    When we use Full Outer Join we get the output as:
    1 aaa
    2 bbb
    3 <Null>
    4 ccc
    <Null> ddd
    Prabhudas

  • Oracle 8i -multiple LEFT OUTER JOIN

    Hi,
    I have to convert some stored procedure from Sql Server to Oracle 8i where I have multiple LEFT OUTER JOIN on a table. Because Oracle 8i accept only one outer join on a table how can I convert this:
    select a.id, b.id
    from test as a LEFT JOIN test1 b ON a.id(+)=b.id
    and a.display(+)=b.display
    and a.name(+)='Done';
    Thanks.

    FROM test a LEFT JOIN test1 b ON b.key = a.keyis equivalent to
    FROM test a, test1 b WHERE b.key(+) = a.keyThere is a restriction (when using the "(+)" syntax) that a table may be outer-joined to at most one other table, but that does not prevent you from having multiple join conditions between those two tables.
    From your example I'm not sure whether you need this:
    SELECT a.id, b.id
    FROM   test a
         , test1 b
    WHERE  a.name = 'Done'
    AND    b.id (+)= a.id
    AND    b.display (+)= a.display;or this:
    SELECT a.id, b.id
    FROM   test1 b
         , test  a
    WHERE  a.id (+)= b.id
    AND    a.display (+)= b.display;
    WHERE  a.name (+)= 'Done';

  • OJ syntax for multi-table left outer join with MS Oracle Driver

    I have a multi-table left outer join that works fine in SQL Server ODBC Driver, Oracle ODBC driver 8.01.07.00, but not with Microsoft ODBC Driver for Oracle 2.573.7326.0
    SELECT * from { oj A LEFT OUTER JOIN B ON A.col1 = B.col1 LEFT OUTER JOIN C ON A.col1 = C.col1 }
    I noticed someone had a similar problem (the proposed solution doesn't work):
    http://www.justpbinfo.com/listarchive/msg02874.html
    Does anyone know how to get this working with the Microsoft ODBC Driver for Oracle? Or does it just not work?

    The Microsoft ODBC Driver for Oracle 2.573.7326.0 does perform the same 'fix up' with {oj} in Oracle 8i. The problem is that it doesn't work when joining more than two tables:
    This works:
    SELECT * from { oj A LEFT OUTER JOIN B ON A.col1 = B.col1}
    This doesn't work:
    SELECT * from { oj A LEFT OUTER JOIN B ON A.col1 = B.col1 LEFT OUTER JOIN C ON B.col1 = C.col1 }
    (The second query will work with the Oracle Oracle ODBC driver, with a bit of tweaking. But I haven't found a way to get it to work with the Microsoft ODBC Driver for Oracle 2.573.7326.0. My suspicion is that it just doesn't work.)
    Gavin

  • Need to specify LEFT OUTER JOIN while using data from logical database BRM?

    I'm trying to extract data for external processing using SQVI. The fields required are in tables BKPF (Document Header) and BSEG (document detail) so I'm using logical database BRM. Note: required fields include the SPGR* (blocking reasons) which don't appear to be in BSIS/BSAS/BSID/BSAD/BSIK/BSAK, hence I can't just use a Table Join on any of these but have to use BSEG, hence BRM.
    If the document type is an invoice, I also need to include the PO number from table EKKO (PO header), if present, hence I'd like to add this to the list. However, if I do this, it seems that some records are no longer display, e.g. AB documents.
    The interesting thing is that not all records are suppressed, so it's not a simple case of the logical database using an effective INNER JOIN, but the effect is similar.
    In any event, is there a way to specify that the link to table EKKO should be treated as an effective LEFT OUTER JOIN, i.e. records from BKPF/BSEG should be included irrespective of whether any records from EKKO/EKPO exist or not?
    Alternatively, is there some other way to get the SPGR* fields (for example) from BSEG and still join the BKPF? Of course, one solution is to use multiple queries, but I was hoping to avoid this.

    Thanks for everyone's responses, I know how to work around the problem with sql, I am wanting to see if there is a way to make the outer joins filter go in the join clause instead of the where clause with Crystal Reports standard functionality. 
    We have some Crystal Reports users that are not sql users, i.e. benefit specialists, payroll specialists and compensation analysts who have Crystal Reports.  I was hoping this functionality was available for them.  I just made my example a simple one, but often reports have multiple outer joins with maybe 2 or three of the outer joins needing a filter on them that won't make them into an inner join. 
    Such as
    Select person information
    outer join address record
    outer join email record
    outer join tax record (filter for active state record & filter for code = STATE )
    outer join pay rates record
    outer join phone#s  (filter for home phone#)
    I thought maybe the functionality may be available, that I just don't know how or where to use it.  Maybe it is just not available.
    If it is not available, I will probably need to setup some standard views for them to query, rather than expecting them to pull the tables together themselves.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Web Gallery - default icon when viewing

    I would like to know why I have default image "clown fish" used for my posted web gallery albums. Shouldn't there be a image selected from the ablum(s).

  • Chapter markers causing iDVD encoding error

    TIP: I discovered that the text used for a chapter marker in FCE can cause the DVD encoding in iDVD to fail. I kept getting encoding errors at the end and tried multiple fixes without success. The solution was to remove the apostrophe that was insert

  • Email hiding or fowarding?

    I have an IWeb website, and I am using a domain name foward for my company name. The domain gave me one email foward. How do I get other email addresses to have fowards. Anyone know where I could go. I want my employess to keep their same address but

  • Only wait for a specific condition for 10 seconds?

    I have a thread that waits to get notified by another thread. But this thread might crash and therfore never notifiy the waiting thread. Is it possible for a thread to wait for a notification for only 10 seconds?

  • Got my AppleID but can't do iTunesStore login !?

    I got my AplleID and can sign in with it here / on apple websites but when I want to sign in to the iTunesStore in the iTunes window I get always "[...] first time [...] please check your account details"  which I already did. I choosed click and buy