Lens Profiles on the Mac

Hi,
I need to import a lens profile that I've made, but I don't know how to do that. I've already tried to find the Camera Raw folder, but it doesn't exist.
What can I do?
Thank you.

Andrew Rodney wrote:
cobra_eater wrote:
Yeah, but I can't find that folder.
HFS Path: Macintosh HD:Library:Application Support:Adobe:CameraRaw:LensProfiles:
The folder for Lr5 is here, not where you have listed
Macintosh HD / Users / [your username] / Library / Application Support / Adobe / CameraRaw / Lens Profiles

Similar Messages

TS1702 We use one ID for the Apps store for 2 iPhones. In the second profile on the Macit is impossible to update apps there is a mistake. What is the decision?

We use one ID for the Apps store for 2 iPhones. In the second profile on the Macit is impossible to update apps there is a mistake. What is the decision?

This happens when you both use the same Apple ID for iMessage. To fix this you have two choices:
On one of the phones go to Settings>Messages>Send & Receive, tap the ID, sign out, then sign back in with a different ID. Note: you can still share the same ID for purchasing in Settings>iTunes & App Stores; or
On both phones go to Settings>Messages>Send & Receive and uncheck the email address(es) shown under "You can be reached by iMessage at". Also uncheck the other phone's phone number, if present.

How can i add the Sigma 10mm 2.8 Fisheye lens profile from the camera profile in windows to lightroom 5?

It only seems to give me a 15mm fisheye option for Sigma and not the 10mm even though it is a profile in the camera profiles folder.
Can anyone help with importing this profile into Lightroom?

nickpearse wrote:
Just so it is black and white for my sake. I am shooting with a Nikon D7100 using a Sigma Fisheye 10mm 2.8 and using the Lens Profile of the Sigma 15mm 2.8mm on Lightroom.
Then the correct profile to use is the Sigma 10mm F2.8 if you want proper Vignetting correction and matching Distortion correction, but you'll need to shoot camera raw images (i.e. no JPEG lens profile). This is also why you are only seeing partial correction. As I said, "With a crop factor camera only the central crop area of the full-frame Sigma 15mm lens profile will be applied."
That said there is absolutely nothing wrong with using the Sigma 15mm lens profile with your crop factor Nikon D7100 if you are happy with the partial correction results, but you can also do this using the correct Sigma 10mm lens profile (set less than 100). There is a fisheye correction plugin called Fisheye-Hemi that works very similar in that it only applies partial correction. You're getting about the same results as Fisheye-Hemi for free using partial correction with the LR lens profile tool. That should make you happy! I suggest experimenting with both the 15mm and 10mm lens profiles and start shooting camera raw image files. Your're not realizing the camera's full capability shooting JPEGs!
In the DSC_7098 images posted none of them look very sharp (slow shutter speed?). Other than geometric correction I can't judge the posted images for "sharpness" in the corrected areas, which is the major concern. The biggest issue with rectilinear correction of fisheye images is loss of detail in areas with the most correction (edges and corners). If that were not the case people would use fisheye lenses for ALL wide-angle images and simply correct them inside LR. Sadly that's not the case and using LR's Lens Profile Distortion and other transform tools to correct fisheye images considerably softens the corrected areas (sides and corners).
Fisheye geometric distortion with some subjects is almost undetectable. So how much correction you need will vary by subject type and what the end use for the image. Any fisheye image that has correction applied will lose sharpness in the corrected areas, which may be fine for most purposes other than large prints.So it's best not to strive for 100% rectilinear correction–Just the correction needed to make the image look better.
Canon 8-15mm F4L FE on 5D MKII Full-Frame @ 15mm (No correction)
Looks good to me with no correction!
For more flexibility and better results PS's Wide Angle Adaptive filter and content aware fill tools will retain more image detail in the corrected areas. Here's the same lens and camera with an image processed in PS:
15mm Full-Frame Fisheye
LR Distortion = 50 (partial) PS Adaptive Wide Angle Filter + Content Aware Fill
The corner image detail is about the same in both of the above images at 1:1 view. Partial LR Distortion correction is good!
So what happens if I apply 100 Distortion correction to the image inside LR?
1:1 Compare View (lower-left) with LR Distortion = 100
100% LR Distortion correction of fisheye images is NOT good IMHO!

When I attempt to apply a lens profile in the Develop module the only choices are for the Fujifilm X100/S/T even though in the Library module the EXIF data correctly shows the camera as the X-T1 and the precise lens used to take the picture. How do I get

When I attempt to apply a lens profile in the Develop module the only choices are for the Fujifilm X100/S/T even though in the Library module the EXIF data correctly shows the camera as the X-T1 and the precise lens used to take the picture. How do I get the right profile available?

First, the required profile needs to be present. LR 5.4 supports the X-T1 in terms of understanding its Raw format, but will not come with a profile for every lens which can be mounted onto that.
A profile is made for each specific lens, as mounted on a certain camera. It can also be used with pictures taken on a different (reasonably similar) camera body than the one originally used during profiling. This is subject to the sensor format: you can employ a given lens profile made for full frame, on an image from a crop sensor behind the same lens - but not vice versa.
Next, the image type needs to correspond to the image type which has been built into the profile: Raw, or non-Raw.
Lightroom offers only profiles of the right type for the image(s) concerned. There are many more provided for correcting camera Raw, than for correcting camera JPG. That is also the case with additional profiles, e.g. those accessed via the Adobe lens profile downloader utility.
Finally, in the event that there simply is no profile out there for a given lens, it is not particularly difficult (though a little tedious) for the end user to generate one, using a further Adobe utility which is downloadable as a package, including a range of checkerboard calibration targets, each of which needs to be printed at a stated physical size.

Camera Raw RC 8.6 does not automatically locate the lens profile for the new Canon 16-35mm f4 lens. The profile is in RC 8.6

I have loaded Camera Raw RC 8.6. It can not automatically locate the new Canon 16-35mm f4 lens, although the lens profile can be manually found.

Hi
I forgot to answer one question.
When I have a file from the Canon 16-35mm f4 lens in Camera Raw and go to
Lens Correction and check the box Enable Lens Profile Corrections, when I
select the model in the first box as Canon, it picks the wrong 16-35mm lens.
It picks the f2.8. I hope that you can get this fixed in Raw 8.6. It is
a major headache for the user of this new lens.
In a message dated 7/28/2014 3:10:44 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:
Camera Raw RC 8.6 does not automatically locate the lens profile for the
new Canon 16-35mm f4 lens. The profile is in RC 8.6
created by ccastleb (https://forums.adobe.com/people/ccastleb) in Adobe
Camera Raw - View the full discussion
(https://forums.adobe.com/message/6591754#6591754)

No lens profiles in the Camera Raw

There are no lens profiles in the Camera Raw Lens Corrections tab. How do I add them?

Assuming I read your post correctly, and that you're trying to use Lens corrections on JPEGs and TIFFs... I believe there's a completely different set of profiles for correcting already "developed" images (such as JPEGs and TIFFs). If I recall correctly (and it's been a while since I read about this), it's the same set that's used inside Photoshop for the Filter - Lens Correction tool (I hope someone here will correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm sure I read this somewhere).
If your lenses are known to Camera Raw when you develop raw files, I suggest you will need to go all the way back to your Raw file and reprocess it from that stage. You'll get a better result anyway.
-Noel

I would like to obtain a lens profile for the Leica D-Lux 5. Is that available?

I would like to obtain a lens profile for the Leica D-Lux 5. Is that available?

If by "Final Cut Title" you mean the Basic Title (that you also get by typing Control-T), you can edit that title by right clicking on the Basic Title template in the Effects Browser >Titles > Bumper/Opener section, and selecting Open a Copy in Motion.
In Motion 5, turn down the disclosure triangle on Main and select the Title layer (in the layers column). Under the canvas at the bottom right are several icons -- click on the one to the right of the gear (Filters) > Stylize > Extrude. In the Inspector, select the Filters tab and right click on each one of those parameters and select Publish (that includes the Gradient). At the bottom, select the Publish OSC control (so that it is Checked.) Everything you just published will appear in the Title Inspector in FCPX.
Save As and give it a new name (although there will already be a "Copy of Basic Title" in FCPX -- happens as soon as you open in Motion) -- something like Extruded Title.
Back in FCPX, you can add that title to your storyline and use the OnScreen Control to create your 3D effect however you like it.
If you like, you can pre-setup the text to appear like you would generally like to have it in it's "starting" condition (for instance, ramp up the text size, set colors, etc.) Every time you save, however you have the title set up in Motion is how it will appear in FCPX when you add it.
HTH

Lens Profile Missing LR3 Mac

Running LR3 3.4.1 on MBP 2.8 OSX 10.6.8.
The Lens Profile for my Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM is missing from the profile choices in Lens Correction. FWIW my Canon EF 24-70 f2.8 USM and Canon EF 70-200 f 2.8 ism do show as well as many other profiles.
When I went to the Library>Application Support>Adobe>Camera Raw>Lens Profiles>1.0>Canon I can see 86 profiles. Most end with Raw.icp and all icons show as documents except the one I need. "Canon EOS 5D Mark II (Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM) - RAW.lcp" it's icon shows as a exec file and that's the one that doesn't show in my profiles dialog.
How can I correct this file to the proper file type?
Thanks, I'm lost on this one.
Greg
Camera is Canon 5D

Thanks, that sounded like a good idea and it got me thinking. Why not trash the profile and import it from another computer. Doing that I found that the file sepraratly downloaded on another computer has the same problem so I can't move it over. The other computer is OS 10.5 Leopard whereas mine is 10.6 Snow Leopard. This leads me to believe that this is an Adobe issue.
Would any other Mac LR3 users please go to Library>Application Support>Adobe>Camera Raw>Lens Profiles>1.0>Canon and see if there is an "exec icon" next to the file named...... Canon EOS 5D Mark II (Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L USM) - RAW.lcp
I'd appreciate it and it will help isolate the problem.
Thanks
Greg Eddinger

Icc profiles on the mac questions

There seem to be multiple locations in OSX for icc profiles. I've found them in system/library/coloursync, library/coloursync and user/library/coloursync. Both display and printer profiles seem to be mixed up in these 3 locations.
Is there a preferred location for different profiles - or does Aperture/OSX find things as required (ie, it 'just works') ?
Also - my lab sent me its .icc profiles which I've copied into my system/library/colorsync/profiles directory. Aperture seems to find them okay. Are .icc files universal (ie, mac and PC) ? I didn't specify that I was a Mac user when I requested the icc profiles.
Paul

There seem to be multiple locations in OSX for icc
profiles. I've found them in
system/library/coloursync, library/coloursync and
user/library/coloursync. Both display and printer
profiles seem to be mixed up in these 3 locations.
Is there a preferred location for different profiles
- or does Aperture/OSX find things as required (ie,
it 'just works') ?
[snip]
I cant' speak as to whether display and print profiles should go in different places, or Mac vs. PC profiles, but the general rules for which Library folder to use are:
/System/Library: Don't mess with it. If an installer puts stuff there, that's fine, but the /System folder and all its contents should be considered hands-off at the user level unless you know what you're doing (the greatest ability to screw up the system comes from mucking around in the /System folder).
/Library: Files (in this case ICC profiles) put in this folder's subfolders will be available to all users of the computer.
/Users/Username/Library: Files put in this folder's subfolders will be available only to the user specified. Other users will not have access to them.
So basically, if you have multiple users on your Mac and you want them all to have access to the ICC profiles, put them in /Library/ColourSync/Profiles. If you only want yourself to be able to use them, they go in /Users/your username/Library/ColourSync/Profiles.
If you only have one user, and will never add any users to the computer, then placing things in /Library or /Users/username/Library will always yield the same results - you'll always have access to them.
You probably haven't broken anything by putting the other ones in the /System/Library/ColourSync/Profiles folder, but you may want to take them out and put them in the appropriate place, for consistency.
Also remember that the user's Library folder is checked by applications first, then the /Library, and lastly the /System/Library. That's the magic of how it "just works" no matter which Library you put the files in.

Hello, Can you tell me where I can found the lens profil for the Canon 500MM F4 Mark II

Can some one tell me where I could find this lens profile for Lightroom 5.4.
thanks

Given the 600mm F4 IS II (February 2011) lens profile hasn't been created yet it may be a while (if ever). I wouldn't worry about it since the lens profile only corrects distortion and vignetting. There is virtually no distortion with either of these lenses and vignetting is within 0.2EV using the 600mm profile, which you can set as the "default" profile. Personally I think people put too much emphasis on the need for "automatic" lens profile correction. All my lens profile defaults are set to Distortion = 0 and Vignetting = 50. I change the setting only when an image appears to need more correction. WHY?
REASON
Distortion correction crops part of the image and increases "edge" stretching with wide angle lenses–It's a trade-off for straight lines in the image. IMHO-If it's not visible in the image you don't need it. 100% Vignetting correction setting can look un-natural and amplifies lens aberrations and softness in the corners, which is where vignetting correction is applied the most.
My 2 cents worth.

Lens profile for the Canon 24-70 II?

There isn't any Lens Profile available for download for the new 24-70 II and the 5D III.
Has anyone used the profile for the Mark I? And, how long before new profiles usually show up at the Adobe site?
Thanks
Mark

It's now in the LR 4.3 release candidate
I installed the release candidate on a separate PC, found the lens profile file in the install folder and copied tge file to the appropriate folder in my 4.2 install.

Lens Profile For The Tamron Lens

Does anyone have a profile for the tamron 28-105 3.5-4.5 usm
on the canon 5d markll

What lens are you looking for? I don’t think there is a 27-40mm. Do you mean a 24-70 or 17-40? And what are the rest of the lens model specifications: max aperture, stabilization, optical quality, etc.

Lens profile for the Tokina 11-16 2.8

How do I and the profile for the Tokina 11-16 2.8 Lens?

The list of lens profiles is filtered according to the file type of the image you are currently working on. Many profiles are made for correcting camera Raw images, and will not be available for camera JPG.
In principle, different profiles should be used - and for example, the LR Raw support for some cameras does perform "silent" lens correction during conversion, in which case this distinction makes sense.
However there is a workaround: by saving a copy of the lens profile and editing that in a text editor to change its "CameraRawProfile" designation from "True" to "False" - this new copy will then appear in the list, and apply corrections, for a non-Raw image.
This kludge may not be technically ideal, but I have found it works fine.

Lens Profiles for the Fuji X-E2 and the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader

I just picked up an Fujifilm X-E2 and an 18mm f/2 lens. I noticed that LR 5.4 doesn't have a profile for this lens/body combination and I'm a little unclear whether it is applied automatically (as was the case with the X100s prior to 5.4), or not.
I also noticed that I can download profiles for the X-E1/18mm combination using the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader and wondered if this was a correct thing to do.
Thank you,
Robert

A couple things:
1) ACR 8.4 will show if a built-in profile has been applied and what corrections have been applied, so if you want to post a raw file from your camera and lens combination someone with PS / ACR 8.4 can give feedback about what built-in profiles might be doing.
2) Regarding the X100S, using ACR 8.4 RC, for an example image I downloaded, the built-in profile corrected Chromatic Aberration and Vignetting. The Adobe-supplied external profile corrected Vignetting and Geometric Distortion. So the Adobe-supplied profile does additional Geometric Distoration compared with the built-in profile. However, there was double-correction for Vignetting so one has to turn off the vignetting correction for the particular lens profile to avoid double-correction. Here is a side-by-side example showing these corrections:
This double-correction of vignetting appears to be have been corrected in the final ACR 8.4 and presumably LR 5.4.

Lens profile for the new Sigma 17-70 contemporary

I am a very happy LR user and have just purchased the new Sigma 17-70 contemporary lens - but i don't think that the profile is already in the profiles list. If not, where/how do i get that profile?
Regards
Henrik - Denmark

I have three listed (see image below)
Isn't it the middle one?

Lens Profiles on the Mac

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for