Level of Maintenance to be set at operation Level

Hi All,
we have a requirement that we need to maintain Level of operation . on the basis of Level of Job.?
Like Operation 010 is Level 1 that can be small Job(Bolt lose)
020 Level 2 .......
030 Level 3.......?
So please suggest what ever best option for achieving this...
Thanks in advance
Regds
Vinit

Thanks All,
Yes Pete requirement is like client wants small job like tightening of bolt is done by PP person so for that we give for that operation as Level -1 simlarly medium complexity can be done by both PP or PM people, High complexity done by PM people alone.
so there is same Level for Multiple operation also.
then we need report also for that
Regds
Vinit

Similar Messages

Setting field (system condition) required at work order operation level

Hi everyone,
I wanted to make 'required' system condition field at operation level, however neither it's available in OIOPL nor in OIOPD..
I'd appreciate if anyone could suggest something
Thanks in advance

Hi Sergey,
The System Condition field enables you to reserve capacity in Production Planning Work Center so that during any maintenance, Production Planning work center should not be undergoing any production.
But the system condition that is taken into account for the above scenario is the System Condition field at the header level which indicates whether the maintenance requires the equipment to be shut down or in operation so apart from the header System Condition field, the operation system condition fields do not create any capacity requirement at PP Work Center.
The Operation Sys Condition field is just for reporting purposes and does not hold any significance in PP-PM integration so for that fact there is no provision for setting this field mandatory at Operation level rather it can be set mandatory at Order header level.
Best Regards,
Muhammad Usman Kahoot

Standard Report for missing parts at production order operation level?

Hi PP Gurus,
            We have standard report for missing parts at production orders level.
For our client, they need a report for missing parts analysis at production order operation level. Do we have any such standard report in the SAP?
Please help.
Thanks,
Reddy.

Hi Arvind,
      Thanks for for your response.
1. List: Components, Layout: Standard layout          set the Missing part
       It shows the component requirement/withdrawn quantity for each operation of production order. It is not showing the commit quantity.
2. List: Components, Layout: Pick list          set the Missing part
       It shows the component requirement/withdrawn quantity for each production order.
3. List: Components, Layout: Missing Parts List-Material View          set the Missing part
       It shows the component requirement/commit quantity for each production order. It is not showing the commit quantity at opertion level.
4. List: Components, Layout: Missing Parts List-Order View          set the Missing part
       It shows the component requirement/commit quantity for each production order. It is not showing the commit quantity at opertion level.
      We are unable to get the solution from all these 1 to 4 reports from COOIS.
Do we have any option to change the existing layout (ex: 3 ) to get the commit quantity for operation with missing parts indicator?
If avilable, what is the procedure to be followed?
Thanks,
Reddy.

BAPI to change data at operation level

Hi,
I have this requirement:
I need to change data at operation level, more particularly Person No (PERNR) by using a BAPI.
Is there any BAPI - in which I can pass the basic data (say Order data and Operation data) and change the PERNR for it.
The name of the BAPI and its usage will help.
Ankur

Hello,
Assuming you are talking about maintenance or service orders, you can use BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN. See function module documentation from SE37. The structure BAPI_ALM_ORDER_OPERATION contains PERS_NO field.
-Paul
Please use Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) forum for PM/CS specific topics
Enterprise Asset Management (SAP EAM)

Cannot attach documents at order operation level in PM order.

Hi,
We have recently upgraded to EHP6 and I have activated the EAM business functions including LOG_EAM_CI_6. In my PM work order, on the Additional Data tab, I can see the "Document Assignment" section at the bottom. Here I attach an existing document and choose Assign to Order. Then I attach another existing document and choose Assign to Operation (0010). After saving the order if I go back into it (IW32/IW33). the document assigned to order header is still there but the document attached to the operation disappears.
I have defined the document type that I am assigning at header level and operation level in Customizing for Cross-Application Components under Document Management --> Control Data --> Define Document Types. I have also specified in Customizing that the assignment to objects PMAUFK (order) and/or PMAFVC (operation) is allowed for the document type of those documents.
Can someone please advise what's wrong here ? I have to attach/assign docs to operations.
Thanks,
Sandy

Hi Sandy
Can you please make sure two things:
1) IMG --> DMS --> Control Data --> Define Document Types --> Select Doc Type ---> Define Object Links. It must be something similar to this one. Without entering CREATE DOCUMENT settings, you may not be allowed to attach a document. That might be causing the issue. If you do not want from within IW31, someone is creating documents then make sure this setting has value =2.
One more possible reason for this is 1:n field in this same setting. If 1:n is not selected, please read the help for that field and make sure the uniqueness of your document attachment to objects.
2) IMG --> DMS --> Control Data --> Maintain Screen for Object Link
For this one make sure that you have a screen entry for PMAUFK and PMAFVC.
Now if attachment does not work, try creating a document and let us know what is the error message.
And do you know that there is another way of attaching documents to the operation which is attaching them as PRT. Just select the operation, click on PRT button and select document and attach it.
I hope this will help.
Regards
Savas
Message was edited by: Savas Yazici

Operation level not getting auto approved

Hi ,
Can anyone help me to make operation level request auto completed in oim 11g R2

use Identity System Administration console and create new approval policy:
- select request type
- set Auto Approval check box
- select scope
- set rule (meet your requirement)
a.

Help - Web Service Operation-level (rather than end-point level) policies

Hi Guys,
According to the documentation:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E15523_01/apirefs.1111/e13952/taskhelp/webservices/ConfigureWSPolicyFile.html
you can associate a policy at the end-point level, or the operation level.
I'm wondering if the service implements policy at the operation level, what is required from a client perspective to set SecurityPolicyFeature just for a specific operation?
Or, does one have to continually keep requesting a new port with the appropriate feature for each operation?
e.g.
// operation without policy
StockMarketPortType port = service.getStockMarketPortTypePort();
Integer stockprice = port.getStockPrice("ORCL");
// if ORCL stock price looks good ... :)
// operation with SAML policy
SecurityPolicyFeature securityFeatures[] =
new SecurityPolicyFeature("oracle/wss11_saml_token_with_message_protection_client_policy")
port = service.getStockMarketPortTypePort(securityFeatures);
boolean result = port.sellStock("ORCL", 500);
thanks
Matt.

Matt,
As Bethune mentioned, the WSS implementation that is part of WebLogic does support operation and message-level policy attachments, but Oracle Web Services Manager (OWSM) does not. The SecurityPolicyFeature you reference in your sample is from OWSM. Do you mind sharing any more details about your use case (and specifically why you would have different policy for different operations) that I could share with OWSM?
In the meantime, your workaround is a good one (different port instances).
Thanks,
Ryan

Fulfillment set at line level

I need to create the fulfilment set on a BOM model item which will have 4 items in this KIT. I need to create the fulfilment set on the kit and 4 th component and need to release the fulfilment set at the time of kit invoicing.
How can I add the fulfilment set at line level?
Thanks,
Srini C

Thanks All,
Yes Pete requirement is like client wants small job like tightening of bolt is done by PP person so for that we give for that operation as Level -1 simlarly medium complexity can be done by both PP or PM people, High complexity done by PM people alone.
so there is same Level for Multiple operation also.
then we need report also for that
Regds
Vinit

UD at operation level

Hi,
Is there any possibility in standard SAP for UD to be given in in-process inspection at each operation level of production?
Please answer.

You can use the functionality Operatoin Complete. This is available in 6.0, maybe a version earlier. Can't remember when it came in. You'll find the config set up under,
QM-->Quality Inspection >Resutls Recording>Make Settings for Operatoin Complete.
It will allow you to assign the selected set of UD codes to the inspection type/plant combination.
This functionality has not integrated functions in SAP at this time and is primarily information only. But you could use user exits at various points and custom programming to check that operations are complete before performing other actions in the system.
FF

Rework activities in operation level in routing

HI SAP GURUS,
As per blue print rework is to be treated as a additional operation in the routings, where ever required. In shop floor control activities client requires for a check for rework activity in each operation level , they have 21 operations. Please clarify is it really viable to go for a rework check in each operation level, how I can set the rework operation in routing.?
thanks,

Hi
Yow can follow the below procedure to create a rework order and Assign it to the trigger point
1.) Create Reference Operation Set ( T.code ca11)
2.) Create Standard Trigger Point (T.Code co31)
Enter the Trigger Point usage /Group as FERT.
Tick the Trigger Point Functions.
3.) Enable the indicator creates order with Reference.
4.) Enter the system status as PCNF.
5.) Enter change as +.
6.) Enable the indicator once.
7.) Now place the cursor on the create order with reference.
8.) Goto Parameters.
9.) In the Parameter enter in the group the created Reference op set group no.
Reward points if usefull
Regards
Palaniappan

Interested in your experience implementing operation-level costing

Greetings,
I'm interested in anyone's experience implementing OLC. After reading OSS note 1002335, implementing OLC was viewed as a core-mod. If you have implemented it, did you face any major issues? What are some of its limitations that your client experienced? Any information is much appreciated.
I am interested in the ability to calculate planned cost at the operation level specifically.
Regards,
Matt Herzog

Matt,
We had a look at it early last year but dropped it since it viewed as a core mod.However at that time we were told that in EHP5/6 this functionality would be provided as standard.
If you are willing to wait it out, it looks like Operation Account assignment is part of EHP5. I am not sure if it replaces the OLC.You may want to get in touch with your sales rep for more info on this.But existing documentation indicates this as
Operation Account Assignment
The Operation Account Assignment solution permits a single plant maintenance or customer service order to have cost objects at the operation level. Each of the account assignment functions available for the header are now possible at the operation level, delivering more flexibility in task costing.
Customers in asset-intensive industries such as utilities, oil and gas, transportation, public sector, and mining
Customers in industries requiring detailed maintenance costs for regulatory reporting
Customers working on multiple assets with different accounting requirements for the same work order
However, if you are just looking for planned cost calculation, the simpler alternative might be to develop a custom report.
Hope it helps.
Regards
Narasimhan

Reporting on Operation Level costing / Operational Account assignment data

Hi folks,
Please can anyone here with experience in dealing with extracting Operation Level costing (OLC) / Operational Account assignment (OAA) data for Maintenance Orders share their experience.
We have done some basic checking around this and Account assignment at activity level has been enabled. Been trying to use 0PM_OM_OPA_2 extractor to get this Operational Account assignment data but no luck.
Perhaps PM Consultants familiar with OLC/OAA solution can help answer this. What are the tables to look at for getting to this Operational Account assignment data?
Any clues will be appreciated.Thanks for your help!

Ravi,
transactions IW40N and IW49N.
Adilson

Activating WCM for control key WCM (operation level)

Hi Guys,
I want to activate WCM in the PM order when i enter WCM control key in operations.
I do NOT want to activate it using "Activate Work Clearance Management for Maintenance Orders".
I have done all the config but maybe i missed something as the work approval icon is not appearing for WCM key in order.
Can someone think of what i may have missed?

I guess it wont solve my problem as the WCM is working at operation level in another system without it
any more suggestions?

PM: change all Orders from sub-operation to operation level

Hi Folks,
I've a requirement to change all PM-Orders from Operation-SubOperation to only Operation Level.
Example:
Op SubOp --> New Op (no subOp)
10__10__-->____10
10__11__-->____11
10__12__-->____12
10__13__-->____13
10__14__-->____14
20__10__-->____20
20__11__-->____21
Does someone here know, how I can make do this in an easy and save way?
The only way I see is to make an own report with calling BAPI BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN.
Have someone another solution
- SAP-Standard-Report?
- LSMW?
Regards

Hi Raghu,
Many Thanks for your quick reply.
Okay ... no LSMW.
And also no Standard-Reports?
Do you think, making my own program is the best way?
Regards,
Daniel

Unable to set a top-level property object

Hey guys
I've made a little sequence to fetch data from a XML file. In that XML file, there is some informations (entries) (IP addresses, port numbers, etc) about 4 different types of devices(sections are the devices names). The first section of the XML tells me the NAMES of the devices I have to configure. The type of each device is located in the entries of each device. Each device has its own information and I can have more than one device of a type. In teststand, I've created custom data types (containers with empty fields) for each type of device I need.
I want to dynamically create the devices that the XML file tells me to configure as fileglobal variables and populate them with their own config informations (entries of the XML file). I'm creating new fileglobal of the type I want using PropertyObject step and I'm creating an alias of that fileglobal that I'm passing in parameter to a subsequence who's getting infos from XML. Here, everything is OK.
The problem occurs when I want to configure 2 or more objects of the same type. At the SetProperty step (where i'm creating the fileglobal variable) teststand gives me the error:
"Unable to set a top-level property object to another object. Error accessing item 'Parameters.DeviceToInitStruct'."
Is there any ways to avoid that problem and creating to variable of the same type ?
thanks

Hi
I finally got rid of that problem.
Instead of using a PropertyObject.Clone step, I used a statement who's just copy the "MasterObject" into a "CloneObject" and i'm working with that copy. So the sequence can now create devices of the same type without any conflict with the first device.
i'll post here a short example to show how i did... maybe it'll be useful for someone...
regards

Level of Maintenance to be set at operation Level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for