Levels, And Privileges In Detail

I was wondering about two things in regaurds to the privileges, the first one being Conference Calls can someone explain in detail waht those are please? And the other question I have is in regaurd to Lounge Acess and MVP Meetups what are these? Thanks in avance!
Reputation, status levels, and privileges
When another community member marks your answer as helpful or solved, you receive reputation points. You can find any user's status level and points next to each post.
As you collect more reputation points, your status level increases and you receive additional privileges.
Status Level
Points
Privilege
Level 1
0-149
Level 2
150-499
Report Post
Level 3
500-999
Custom Avatar
Level 4
1,000-3,999
Conference Calls
Level 5
4,000-7,999
User Tips
Level 6
8,000-19,999
Lounge Access, MVP Meetups
Level 7
20,000-34,999
Level 8
35,000-49,999
Level 9
50,000-79,999
Level 10
80,000+
Best,
Coander15

Kappy provided my favorite answer to this question: apple points and priveleges

Similar Messages

Facts at different Logical Dimension Level and Default Interaction (Drill)

I have one Geography Logical Dimension that consists of 3 physical tables snowflaked. The 3 tables are City, State and Country. I have created 3 Level Based Hierarchies.
I have 2 Facts. Fact_State is at the State grain only (Set the appropriate Content Level). Fact_City is at the City grain (Set the appropriate Content Level).
When I pull a query with Country and a metric from Fact_State, the default interaction allows me to drill down. I drill into the State values. I would assume that the Drill interaction would stop here since this metric (Fact_State) is only at this level.
What actually occurs is it allows for a drill into City and when you look at the Physical SQL it is trying to hit the other Fact Table (Fact_City) and pulls back no metrics. I then return no data.
I would ask does anyone know if this is the expected behaviour? Is there anyway to stop the drill at the State Level when metrics are only pulled from the State Fact?
Please let me know if more information is needed.

You need to have a metric sourcing from both Fact_State and Fact_City, provided both facts are as Logical sources for the logical fact table.
Make sure Fact_State got proper level and Fact_City got detail level.
When you pull Country or State with metric query should hit Fact_State, when you drill down below the state query should be from Fact_City with proper data.
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Mar 28, 2013 2:43 PM
I can look into your new post only If you update this or older posts. Still you may get responses from others ;)
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on May 22, 2013 2:00 PM

Max stock level and reorder point for all the materials

Dear experts,
Is there any standard mm report that will give the details of max stock level and reorder point details for all the materials?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Krish

Your requirement can be pulled from table MARC. I dont think there is a standard report to meet your requirement. You can meet your requirement through SAP Query though.

What are the levels and points when you go to yor profile here on the website

what are the levels and points when you go to your profile here on the website? and what do they do?

Welcome!
The level system is rather thinnly explained in this ASC tutorial:
Reputation points, status levels and privileges
What you get for it--that I know of--is that, at Level 2, you get the privilege of using the "Report Abuse" function to tell the Hosts about an abusive poster, inappropriate post, or even to ask that a post be moved to another, more appropriate forum area for the subject matter.
At Level 6, you get Lounge privileges where you have direct access to the ASC Hosts for helping with forum function issues, and to an area where you can hobnob with other Wizards.
The list of all ASC tutorials is here:
https://discussions.apple.com/static/apple/tutorial/index.html

ASDM and privilege level (using TACACS)

Hi experts,
Initial question:     How can I force ASDM to ask for the enable password when the user click on Apply ?
Environment description:
I have an ASA 5510 connected to an ACS 5.0.
Security policy:
I want the user defined on my ACS to be able to gain privilege level 15 but only after using their enable password. But by default the user must be in no privileged mode (<15).
A SNMP alert is sent when the ASA catches a "User priv level changed" syslog message. (logging customization)
ACS configuration:
Maybe I misunderstand the TACACS privilege level parameters on ACS.
I set a Shell Profile which gives the user the following privilege levels:
Default Privilege Level = 7
Maximum Privilege Level = 15
1st config tested on ASA:
aaa authentication ssh console grp-tacacs LOCAL
aaa authentication http console grp-tacacs LOCAL
aaa authentication enable console grp-tacacs LOCAL
! no authorization set
Results:
     On CLI:     perfect
My user authenticates with his network password to get EXEC access. Then he gains privilege access using the enable command and his enable password
     On ASDM:     policy security failure
When the user connects through ASDM, he gains privilege level 15 directly
It seems that if authorization is not set, ASDM always gives privilege level 15 to any user
So OK for CLI, but NOK pour ASDM
2nd config tested on ASA:
aaa authentication ssh console grp-tacacs LOCAL
aaa authentication http console grp-tacacs LOCAL
aaa authentication enable console grp-tacacs LOCAL
aaa authorization exec authentication-server
! no authorization command set
Results:
     On CLI:     lose enable access
I can't gain privilege level 15 access anymore. When I use the enable command, I move to privilege level 7 only. So in this case ASA use the TACACS Default Privilege Level value.
     On ASDM:     policy security failure
When the user connects through ASDM, he gains privilege level 7 as describe on the bottom of the ASDM window BUT the user has full rights and can change settings.
So NOK for CLI and ASDM
Question:    Why do I have more access rights with ASDM as on CLI with the same settings ?
3rd config tested on ASA:
aaa authentication ssh console grp-tacacs LOCAL
aaa authentication http console grp-tacacs LOCAL
aaa authentication enable console grp-tacacs LOCAL
aaa authorization exec authentication-server
aaa authorization command LOCAL
! specific authorization command set for ASDM applied
Results:
     On CLI:     lose enable access (same as config 2)
     On ASDM:     unenable to gain privilege level 15 --> acceptable
When the user connects through ASDM, he gains privilege level 7 as describe on the bottom of the ASDM window AND the user really has level 7 access rights.
So NOK for CLI and Acceptable for ASDM
Question:     Is there no possibility to move to enable mode on ASDM ?
4th config tested on ASA:
aaa authentication ssh console grp-tacacs LOCAL
aaa authentication http console grp-tacacs LOCAL
aaa authorization exec authentication-server
aaa authorization command LOCAL
! no aaa authentication for 'enable access', using local enable_15 account
! specific authorization command set for ASDM applied
Results:
     On CLI:     acceptable
My user authenticates with his network password to get EXEC access. Then he gains privilege access using the enable command and the local enable password
     On ASDM:     unenable to gain privilege level 15 --> acceptable (same as config 3)
So Acceptable for CLI and ASDM
Questions review:
1 - Is it possible to force ASDM to ask for the enable password when the user click on Apply ?
2 - Why do I have different access rights using ASDM as on CLI with the same settings ?
3 - Is there no possibility to move to enable mode on ASDM when the user is on privilege level 7 whereas he has Maximum Privilege Level = 15 ?
4 - How may I understand these parameters on TACACS: Default Privilege Level and Maximum Privilege Level ?
Thanks for your help.

Thanks for your answer jedubois.
In fact, my security policy is like this:
A) Authentication has to be nominative with password enforcement policy
     --> I'm using CS ACS v5.1 appliance with local user database on it
B) Every "network" user can be granted priviledge level 15
     --> max user priviledged level is set to 15 in my authentication mechanism on ACS
C) A "network" user can log onto the network equipments (RTR, SW and FW) but having monitor access only first.
D) A "network" user can be granted priviledged level 15 after a second authentication which generates a log message
     --> SNMP trap sent to supervision server
E) The user password and enable password have to be personal.
So, I need only 2 priviledged level:
- monitor (any level from 1 to 14. I set 7)
- admin (level 15)
For RTR, SW and FW (on CLI), it works as wanted: the "network" users connect to the equipment in monitor mode. They type "enable" and they use their private enable password to be granted priviledged level 15.
ASDM interface is requested by the customer.
For ASDM, as I were not able to satisfy the security policy, I apply this:
1- I activated Exec Shell Access authorization to get the default user priviledge level value from ACS
     --> Then, when I log onto the ASDM using a "network" user, I have priviledge level 7 but I am able to change the parameter.
2- I activated LOCAL Command authorization (adding "ASDM defined User Roles")
     --> Then, when I log onto the ASDM using a "network" user, I have priviledge level 7 and I can't push any modification.
     --> The issue is that I can't push any modification on CLI either ... :-( because my user is stuck on "default priviledge level" 7 and can't get access to "max priviledge level 15" as defined on ACS when LOCAL authorization is set
     (ok I go on my ACS and move the default priviledge level to 15 to restore an admin access to the ASA and apply 3- before resetting it to default priviledge level to 7)
3- I remove "aaa authorization enable console TACACS" to use local enable password
     --> now I can't get admin access on ASDM: OK
     --> and I can get admin access on CLI entering the local enable password
At the end, I satisfy my policy security tokens A to D but not E. That's a good compromise but do you see a solution to satisfy E either ?
Thanks

How to improve the query performance in to report level and designer level

How to improve the query performance in to report level and designer level......?
Plz let me know the detail view......

first its all based on the design of the database, universe and the report.
at the universe Level, you have to check your Contexts very well to get the optimal performance of the universe and also your joins, keep your joins with key fields, will give you the best performance.
at the report level, try to make the reports dynamic as much as you can, (Parameters) and so on.
and when you create a paremeter try to get it match with the key fields in the database.
good luck
Amr

Config for Cost & budgeting at activity level and WBS element level in PS

Dear GURU's,
please suggest me how to do the spro configuration for budgeting and costing, here my requirement is I need to do cost planning and budgeting at WBS element level and Activity level. We two deferent types of projects.
Regards,
Bha

Hi Bhanu,
Cost planning in projects can be done through two techinques:
I. Manual cost planning (at WBS level)
1. Overall planning (Struture-oreiented planning)
2. Detailed planning (Cost element planning)
3. Unit costing
4. Easy cost planning form
II. Automatic cost planning using networks and assigned orders
For customizing: Use transaction OPUV and enter the required entries for cost planning.
Budget can do only at WBS level. For configuration do the following steps:
1. Create Budget profile - OPS9
2. Assign Budget profile in Project profile - OPSA
3. Then allot budget to your project - CJ30
hope it will be very clear. Appreciate with point if it useful.
Thanks and Regards
vetrivelan

User analysis at Action level and Permission level

Hi Gurus,
I am totally confused by the way our CC is working while using it for User Analysis. I understand that during Risk Analysis for a user with Report Type "Action Level" will give the conflicts at the transaction level for the user and with Report Type "Permission Level" will give the conflicts at the Object level for the user. Also the permission level report includes the results of the action level report as well and hence Permission level report is more detailed & reliable.
But now when I run the analysis report for a particular user both at Action & Permission level...the user is not getting any conflicts at Action level but it is showing conflicts at the Permission level. For another user the vice versa is happening. Could anyone help me in understanding the above 2 scenarios?
Regards,
Lakshmi.

Hi
A user to be need to have a action level conflict should have that transansaction code access only ie object s-tcode = xyz transaction code.
Similarly for a user to be reported in permission level conflict the user should have access to
S_tcode = xyz transaction code Plus all other authorisation objects...Or in other words if the user is missing any authorisation object it wont be reported there...
So just check what authorisation object level check is enabled for that transaction code in the rule architect tab.. Thereafter see whether user have access to all those authorisation object with the values specified...
Parveen

How to add three fields in Sales order item level and supress/hide many

Hi Gurus,
My client requirement is :
1. Three fields to be added at Sales order Item level and they should flow till billing.
2. Supress/hide most of the fields in Sales order, so that end user will be happy( thru SHDO how to do)
Please share your experiences and help me.
BEST REGARDS
Srikanth

Hi Subba Rao
in VA01 screen - Material /qty/ after entering this client wants to enter three more details say X/Y/Z
and after that he dont want to see maximum fields displayed in VA01 Screen.
I think it makes sense.
Regards
Srikanth

Want to upgrade 2008 R2 to 2012. Upgrade advisor giving errors relating to Database Compatability Level and Server Collation

I want to upgrade a SQL Server from 2008 R2 to 2012. When I run upgrade advisor, I get the following error messages:
Rule "Valid Database compatibility level and successful connection" failed.
The report server database is not a supported compatibility level or a connection cannot be established. Use Reporting Services Configuration Manager to verify the report server configuration and SQL Server management tools to verify the compatibility
level.
Rule "Valid Database server collation and successful connection" failed.
The SQL Server Database Engine is not configured with a valid server collation and cannot be used as the Reporting Services SharePoint Shared Service catalog database.
The database called ReportServer has Collation = Latin1_General_Cl_AS_KS_WS and Compatibility level = 100

Hi Andrew,
Regarding to the first error message, please check the Reporting Service Configuration Manager, make sure that you connect to ReportServer database from the correct server
and use servername\instancename format connection string. For more details, please review this similar
thread.
Regarding to the second error, it is caused by that the current SQL Server Database Engine server is using an incompatible server collation.
SQL Server 2012 Reporting Services SharePoint mode utilizes the SharePoint shared services architecture. SharePoint does not support SQL Server Database Engine configured for case sensitive or server collations or binary server collations.
And since the SQL Server Database Engine server collation property cannot be changed, you will not be able to complete an upgrade of Reporting Services. You will need to migrate your Reporting Services installation to a new server which is using a compatible
server collation. For more details, please review the following article:
Incompatible Database Engine Server Collation:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh759335%28v=sql.110%29.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
Thanks,
Lydia Zhang
Lydia Zhang
TechNet Community Support

Schema level and table level supplemental logging

Hello,
I'm setting up bi- directional DML replication between two oracle databases. I have enabled supplemental logging database level by running this command-
SQL>alter database add supplemental log data (primary key) columns;
Database altered.
SQL> select SUPPLEMENTAL_LOG_DATA_MIN, SUPPLEMENTAL_LOG_DATA_PK, SUPPLEMENTAL_LOG_DATA_UI from v$database;
SUPPLEME SUP SUP
IMPLICIT YES NO
-My question is should I enable supplemental logging table level also(for DML replication only)? should I run the below command also?
GGSCI (db1) 1> DBLOGIN USERID ggs_admin, PASSWORD ggs_admin
Successfully logged into database.
GGSCI (db1) 2> ADD TRANDATA schema.<table-name>
what is the deference between schema level and table level supplemental logging?

For Oracle, ADD TRANDATA by default enables table-level supplemental logging. The supplemental log group includes one of the following sets of columns, in the listed order of priority, depending on what is defined on the table:
1. Primary key
2. First unique key alphanumerically with no virtual columns, no UDTs, no functionbased
columns, and no nullable columns
3. First unique key alphanumerically with no virtual columns, no UDTs, or no functionbased
columns, but can include nullable columns
4. If none of the preceding key types exist (even though there might be other types of keys
defined on the table) Oracle GoldenGate constructs a pseudo key of all columns that
the database allows to be used in a unique key, excluding virtual columns, UDTs,
function-based columns, and any columns that are explicitly excluded from the Oracle
GoldenGate configuration.
The command issues an ALTER TABLE command with an ADD SUPPLEMENTAL LOG DATA clause that
is appropriate for the type of unique constraint (or lack of one) that is defined for the table.
When to use ADD TRANDATA for an Oracle source database
Use ADD TRANDATA only if you are not using the Oracle GoldenGate DDL replication feature.
If you are using the Oracle GoldenGate DDL replication feature, use the ADD SCHEMATRANDATA command to log the required supplemental data. It is possible to use ADD
TRANDATA when DDL support is enabled, but only if you can guarantee one of the following:
● You can stop DML activity on any and all tables before users or applications perform DDL on them.
● You cannot stop DML activity before the DDL occurs, but you can guarantee that:
❍ There is no possibility that users or applications will issue DDL that adds new tables whose names satisfy an explicit or wildcarded specification in a TABLE or MAP
statement.
❍ There is no possibility that users or applications will issue DDL that changes the key definitions of any tables that are already in the Oracle GoldenGate configuration.
ADD SCHEMATRANDATA ensures replication continuity should DML ever occur on an object for which DDL has just been performed.
You can use ADD TRANDATA even when using ADD SCHEMATRANDATA if you need to use the COLS option to log any non-key columns, such as those needed for FILTER statements and KEYCOLS clauses in the TABLE and MAP parameters.
Additional requirements when using ADD TRANDATA
Besides table-level logging, minimal supplemental logging must be enabled at the database level in order for Oracle GoldenGate to process updates to primary keys and
chained rows. This must be done through the database interface, not through Oracle GoldenGate. You can enable minimal supplemental logging by issuing the following DDL
statement:
SQL> alter database add supplemental log data;
To verify that supplemental logging is enabled at the database level, issue the following statement:
SELECT SUPPLEMENTAL_LOG_DATA_MIN FROM V$DATABASE;
The output of the query must be YES or IMPLICIT. LOG_DATA_MIN must be explicitly set, because it is not enabled automatically when other LOG_DATA options are set.
If you required more details refer Oracle® GoldenGate Windows and UNIX Reference Guide 11g Release 2 (11.2.1.0.0)

Can a CR work only for one aggregation level and not other ?

Hi Experts,
I have a real time infocube (RTIC) over which there is a multiprovider, on top of which I have built 2 aggregation levels.
There are sequence of 2 characteristic relationships (CR's based on exit class) defined for the same RTIC.
Is it possible that the CR's be functional for one aggregation level and not in case of second aggregation level ?
Thanks and Regards,
Pankaj

Additionally let me explain the scenario in more detail:
The difference between 2 mentioned aggr levels is that of 0CALMONTH which is checked in second aggr level.
0CALMONTH is assigned as target char in first CR, hence both the CRu2019s work for input ready report built on first aggregation level and do not function with input ready report built over second aggregation level.
Therefore I wish to skip the complete execution of CRu2019s for I-R reports based on 2nd aggregation level.
As CR of type with derivation is functional only if the target char selected is not present in the aggregation level.
Please let me know if any more details are required.
Thanks,
Pankaj

ASCP Taking Lead time to buy Item from Item Level and not from ASL

Hi All.
We have a buy Item Which is used at multiple Organization now we have defined processing Lead time for this Item at Item Level and ASL level (Global) However for different organization Like ABC and XYZ we have same supplier and Supplier Site for this item,
Below is the details of Item
Item's Processing Lead Time at Item Level
Org - ABC - 35
Org - XYZ - 15
Item's Processing Lead Time at ASL Level
Org - ABC - 10
Org - XYZ - 5
Now when we run ASCP plan for org XYZ and check for exception, Item's Lead time is coming from Item Level (15) not from ASL Level (Does this is expected behavior from Oracle?)
Regards.

Hi Abhishek,
I tested one more time with the same scenario, this time ASCP is considering Processing lead time form ASL only however it is considering processing lead time for another organization (When I am running ASCP plan for Org XYZ ASCP is considering Processing lead time for ABC).
Does it is due to same supplier site for both the organization?
Also it has an active sourcing rule for the same supplier
Regards.

Administrator or higher level access privileges..... HELP - my computer...

My computer and my printer all of a sudden won't talk. So I went to re-install and my computer won't let me install anything. It tells me I don't have authorization that I need 'Administrator or higher level access privileges.'
So I went into preferences to make sure that I was the authority, (as I am the only one setting the machine up, my husband uses it sometimes. ) And that appears set right. But it still won't let me install anything. And I can't print anything either. ?? HELP - QUICK -- PLEASE.... I have been trying to fix this myself for a week and can't.
Tonight I went through the apple care protection plan, and tried the quick reference guide and it tells me to put in the TechTool Deluxe and it won't give me authorization to even do that.....

ljwoodley-
Are you logged in as the administrator?
Does this happen even if you boot from DVD?
Luck-
-DaddyPaycheck

Report On pay details and emp basic details

HI All
My clinet has a requirement to create a report which consists all pay details like BASIC, HRA,COVEYANCE,PF etc and also employee details like nationality,qualification,previous experience,toal experience.Please guide me how to create this do i need to create Zreport or it can be done through SAP Query..
Regards
Vijay

Vijay,
If you want the pay details from infotype level, then we can do this. But if your client want the details based on the RT table,( means picking up the data for the exact days worked , etc ) then you should go with a Z report.
If your employer want to see the salary details, then you can show them the wage type reporter too.
Depends on your client req...
My suggestion: go for Z report.
Regards,
Sri..

Levels, And Privileges In Detail

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for