Library size differs from Vault size

I just made a new Aperture Vault. My Aperture Library file is 41.66GB. My Vault file is 35.41GB.
Why are these different?
I have consolidated the library as well, so I am sure that the issue is not related to referenced files.
Thanks,
~BC

Thanks for that. Does my vault size (85% of the library size) seem about right to you?
I only ask because the whole point of the vault is to be sure nothing is lost ... so I want to be sure I have this set up properly.
Thanks,
~BC

Similar Messages

  • After release 4.11 library OFGTEL differs from OFGTEL in former release

    Hi,
    After an update of Designer 6i to release 4.11 (coming from Designer 6i version 6.5.40.5.0) I have troubles regarding the Designer library OFGTEL.pll.
    In the library of the new version a procedure CGDV$REF_CODES.SOFT_VAL is adjusted, so that an extra argument is used. If a formmodule is newly generated from the latest release there is no problem.
    However, some existing forms (fmx) are crashing. This is due to the fact that the existing forms are compiled to the older version of OFGTEL.
    Did anyone experience the same problem and what can be done to avoid this? Regenerating all the forms from the new release of Designer is not an option.
    With regards,
    William de Ronde

    Open the PLL file and change any extra arguments to be optional, that is, set their default value = NULL. You must not change the order of the arguments, and the NULL arguments must be at the end of the list (all mandatory arguments comes first). After that recompile all PLL and FMB that depends on this PLL.

  • Library background differs from edit background

    When I'm in edit mode, looking at the background of a slide,
    I can ask the name of the associated background image in the
    library. I have noticed that frequently the image I see in the
    slide edit mode is not the same as the associated background image
    that is stored in the library. This might have to do with the
    mixture of full-motion and regular capture that I'm trying to do.
    Can anyone explain the relationship between these 2 often different
    versions of the background?

    Hi gobaldson,
    The full motion captures do not have a background in the
    library. If you hide the layer with the full motion recording on
    your slide, you will see that the background is white (or whatever
    your Project Background Color is under Project Options). You can
    see the full motion recording in the Library under the "Media"
    category. In Captivate, you can't really edit the background of the
    full motion recorded parts.
    Cheers,
    ~Aaron

  • Why is there a 5 people per day limit to local network shared library? (different from authorization)

    I'm in NYU library pulling on all-nighter, and because I enjoy listening to new musics (not necessarily newly released, but new-for-me musics), I would select and listen from one of the many shared libraries that are listed. If you use library almost everyday, you begin to notice some names that you have seen before. I clicked on the playlist, but there was an error message saying that only five people are allowed to listen per 24 hrs.
    Is there any way to turn this feature off? Why is a "shared" library limited to only five people per day? It's not like we are using it outside personal listening. And I would definitely like to see more than five people listening to my library per day.

    Ah ha! Result! I found this post related to problems with multicast DNS and wired/wireless connections (the situation I have): http://forum1.netgear.com/showthread.php?p=5612
    The latest firmware upgrade (http://kbserver.netgear.com/release_notes/d103043.asp) for the Netgear fixes the problem, and I can now see shared libraries. That router is very popular here in UK, not sure about elsewhere, so maybe others have the same problem.
    Cheers

  • After release 4.11 library OFGTEL differs from OFGTEL65

    Hi,
    After an update of Designer to release 4.11 (coming from release 2) I have troubles generating a form. I found the exact same problem in this forum (see OFGTEL65 problem however the solution provided by Lauri (Boyd, i presume) cannot be applicable.
    She suggests to replace the OFGTEL65.pll by the OFGTEL.pll, delivered by the new release 4.11
    However, this means that all the headstart customizations, that can be found in the original OFGTEL65.pll are lost!!!!! Can the working of headstart still be guaranteed then?
    What to do? Are there new OFG* libraries patched by Headstart, which I missed?
    With regards,
    William de Ronde

    Open the PLL file and change any extra arguments to be optional, that is, set their default value = NULL. You must not change the order of the arguments, and the NULL arguments must be at the end of the list (all mandatory arguments comes first). After that recompile all PLL and FMB that depends on this PLL.

  • Why are link default library dirs different from runtime default dirs?

    I'm fairly new to Linux and Arch in particular. I've been trying to get around most issues by myself and I've been successful in general. In fact, I'm writing not so much because of a problem, but to better understand why the solution I found works, and if it is the right solution for my case.
    So, I downloaded the source for a library I wanted to use (SFML if you're curious), built it and installed it. Looking around the net it seemed that the proper place to install things you compile yourself is /usr/local, so the libs went to /usr/local/lib. So far so good.
    I then made a quick test application to make sure everything was working properly (source can be seen here: http://www.sfml-dev.org/tutorials/2.1/start-linux.php). It built correctly, but when I tried to run it I got an error that the library could not be found. So looking the error up in google, I found people saying you had to set the $LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the lib directory. In fact, at the end of the SFML tutorial it suggests this as well, but only if you install in a non-standard directory.
    I found it odd that I should specify this variable. Had it been unset by something I did? Should I have set it before? I hadn't had to specify the directory when I built the program, which made it seem as though /usr/local/lib was a default directory. So why wasn't the library being found?
    A bit more research uncovered that one should not in fact rely on $LD_LIBRARY_PATH for this, but instead you should specify it when building with -rpathDIR, so that the executable itself knows where to look. And indeed, setting this option when building fixed the issue.
    My question then, is: why do I have to specify the library path for runtime, but not when building? Is it normal for usr/local/lib to not be searched, or did I break something in my install? Is GCC just trying to be helpful and tripping me up by looking in places that are reasonable for libraries to be, but that the system itself won't search?
    Last edited by jp.garibotti (2014-02-09 20:14:54)

    Well, after reading and getting to know the AUR a bit, at least I know why /usr/local/lib wasn't searched.
    So, if I got it right, I have to use the AUR to download the build script to build a package. Then I use pacman to install that package. This sends the relevant binaries to where they need to go, which is where the system will look for them.
    So as long as I stay inside the build system, everything will go fine.
    If I don't build shared libraries myself, and limit myself to running my own executables, I shouldn't need to worry about the build system beyond this. If I ever want to send something I did to someone else, however, I need to create a package for them to build, which will have to work with whatever distribution package manager they have. Assuming I want to keep everything tidy.
    There is one more thing I'm not clear on, though. So I installed the packages, headers are in /usr/include, but where should I place the sources? If I want to debug something and follow a call into the library, for example?

  • Discrepancies between vault size and library size

    Can anyone explain to me why there is large discrepancy between the size of my vault and the Aperture library?
    I just synced my library to a vault and there is a 9 GB difference in the size of the two, with the vault being larger. Now I know there is a container of deleted images in the vault, but that only adds up to about 800 MB, so that still leaves an 8.2 GB difference. I'm wondering why there is such a discrepancy.
    Both the drive that the library lives on, and the vault drive, are exactly the same size (300gb). In fact, they are the same brand of drive. Also, both are formatted the same.
    I'm not sure I know what's going on, and that makes me a bit nervous since I'm dealing with my archive here.
    Any thoughts?
    Antonio

    So, you can see from this that something is strange.
    http://amrosario.com/vault01.jpg
    This image shows a screen shot of the Aperture Library compared to the Vault which I just synced. The Aperture Library is on the left, with the "Get Info" box behind it. The Vault is on the right with its "Get Info" box behind it.
    There are some BIG differences in the size of the project folders, as you can see, with the vault's folders being smaller across the board.
    I mean, maybe I could chalk this up to some formatting differences between the drive (although I think I remember they were formatted the same). But if there was a formatting difference, wouldn't the folders all exhibit a similar proportion of discrepancy? Look at the "New York City" folders - almost 2 GB in difference, but the "Commercial Work" folder is less than 1.4 GB difference.
    Arrrgh!
    Antonio

  • Library size differs

    Hi, when I open iTunes, at the bottom it tells me my library size which is around 55GB but when I navigate to my 'iTunes Music' folder in the finder it states it's 90GB. Why the dramatic change in size?!
    Can some one clear up why this might be. Thanks

    Thanks for that. Does my vault size (85% of the library size) seem about right to you?
    I only ask because the whole point of the vault is to be sure nothing is lost ... so I want to be sure I have this set up properly.
    Thanks,
    ~BC

  • Why has the total library size gone from my itunes

    I downloaded the latest iTunes the other day and now the total library size is missing and the window size is actually too large for my monitor too, though I've not altered any settings.  
    I HATE not having the library size showing at the bottom of the page when my iTunes library is open.  Anyone know what's happened?

    Empty/corrupt library after upgrade/crash
    Hopefully it's not been too long since you last upgraded iTunes, in fact if you get an empty/incomplete library immediately after upgrading then with the following steps you shouldn't lose a thing or need to do any further housekeeping.  Note that in iTunes 11 an "empty" library may show your past purchases with links to stream or download them.
    In the Previous iTunes Libraries folder should be a number of dated iTunes Library files. Take the most recent of these and copy it into the iTunes folder. Rename iTunes Library as iTunes Library (Corrupt) and then rename the restored file as iTunes Library.itl. Start iTunes. Should all be good, bar any recent additions to or deletions from your library.
    Alternatively, depending on exactly when and why the library went missing, there may be a more recent .tmp file in the main iTunes folder that can be renamed as iTunes Library.itl to restore the library to a recent state.
    See iTunes Folder Watch for a tool to catch up with any changes since the backup file was created.
    When you get it all working make a backup!
    Should you be in the unfortunate position where you are no longer able to access your original library, or a backup of it, then see Recover your iTunes library from your iPod or iOS device.
    tt2

  • Why is my amount of space used different from my Creative Cloud Files Folder size?

    Why is my amount of 'space used' different from my Creative Cloud Files Folder size? CC is telling me I'm using 93% (18.6GB of 20GB) but my CC File Folder only contains 13.42GB?  

    Have you checked the "Archive" section on the Creative.adobe.com website ?
    When you delete the files then they are moved to the "Archive" from where you can delete the content permanently.
    Clear the Archive section and then check.

  • Is there a way to "print" a raster image to a size differing from the artboard, just as w/vectors?

    when you print from illustrator you can specify to fit a paper size
    that's different from the artboard being used. I want raster images that differ in size from the artboard - is this
    possible? Or would figuring out the pixels based on a dpi and a sheet size be the equivalent?

    I'm not clear what you describe. Sounds to me like you are confusing the rasterization on the printer/ in the printer driver with actually resizing. All that happens when you fit content on a page for printing is to change the overall ratio of paper vs. content vs. rasterization grid and that is a mere technical thing. Works for vectors and bitmaps. however, AI having a track record of being extremely picky about what it prints, you'd probably do better saving a PDF and printing from Acrobat.
    Mylenium

  • Vault size vs APerture library size and related questions

    My aperture library is 50GB for some 65,000 referenced pictures...how does this compare with others? To me, it seems a bit big.
    Also odd. The vault backup of my libarary is 9.1GB ONLY! How come?
    I think that all of my pictures are referenced.....is there an easy way to check?
    If I make a new fresh library and restore from the vault, what will I loose, if anything? Will I need to reconnect pictures or anything?

    that seems about right to me. what's taking up space are previews and thumbnails. afaik, the vault doesn't hold any of those, only the database, albums, projects and configuration files.
    if you restore from a vault, all the previews and thumbnails have to be rebuilt. you can save a little space that way, because the thumbnail files don't shrink when you erase photos or move them to another project, but personally i don't think it's worth the time and effort.
    j

  • Restoring Aperture Library from Vault

    Hi all,
    I hope someone can help.  I recently had my 'Drobo' die on me as two discs failed at the same time.  I also have a copy of my Aperture Library backed up in a Vault.  I have carried out a 'Restore from Vault' and my new  external HD shows 1.5TB of data (same as my original library).  When I open Aperture, I can see all my folders and projects, but each project has no photos in it.  I have tried repairing the database and rebuilding the database using the option key on start up, but I repeatedly get to approx 83-89% complete and my system hangs and I get a message that I have run out of applications memory.  I then get the Spinning wheel and eventually have to reboot the iMac.
    1. How can I recover my data?
    2. Is there anything else I can/should do? Am I doing anything wrong?
    3. Is there anyway of recvering the files seperately of the external hard drive with other data recovery software?
    I am running Aperture the most uptodate version of Aperture 3.4.x, on OS X Mavericks, on a 3.4GHz i7 iMac with 12GB ram.
    One point I may need to add, I was backing up to Vault when my 'Drobo' unit failed, although based on the size of the vault, I think it had finished backing up, although can not be certain.
    Any help/assistance or advice would be greatfully received as I have lost my library, its parity due to two failed drives simultaneously and possibly a corrupt vault(?).
    Thank you in advance for your help.
    Paul W

    Will rebuilding the library place the images into their correct projects/folders?
    Will rebuilding return the images to their edited version state?
    This library is the restored library from your vault, correct? 
    What seems to be missing are all of the 'version' images processed in Aperture.
    In what way "missing"? Are all your projects empty or are you seeing broken thumbnails of the missing images in the projects?
    I am afraid, rebuilding will not be able to reconnect the "recovered" originals to the versions. The images are in the "Recovered" project, because Aperture does not know the link to the version.
    If your missing versions are still showing thumbnails, however correpted, you could use the lift&stamp tool to transfer the adjustments from the unusuable versions to the recovered versions.
    But that would be a bit daunting for 14000 recovered originals.
    I'd try something different - quick and dirty emergency measure: Try to open your vault directly on the drive where it is now without restoring it.
    Keep the restored library you are now having save and don't delete it.
    Change the filename extension of your vault to ".aplibrary", this will turn the vault into an Aperture library and try to open it directly in Aperture by double clicking it. This needs to be done in-place, on the Drobo-attached drive where you originally created the vault. Do not move it.
    Aperture will now try to open the vault as the current Aperture library and upgrade it. There is a slim chance, that the links between originals and versions will remain intact, if the vault is not restored to a different volume but repaired in-place on the original volume.
    Frank, what do you think? Should Snurge first try to repair the permissions on the drive?
    -- Léonie

  • APERTURE 3.1.2'S MAXIMUM LIBRARY SIZE?

    I HAVE MY APERTURE 3.1.2'S LIBRARY FILE STORED ON AN EXTERNAL DISK.  IT IS OVER 150 GB IN SIZE (ALONG WITH ITS VAULT SIZE OF ANOTHER 148 GB.  I'VE ATTEMPTED TO FIND WHAT THE MAXIMUM SIZE THIS FILE CAN/SHOULD BE BUT CANNOT FIND IT IN APERTURE'S LITERATURE.  SO, IS THERE A MAXIMUM SIZE AND IF SO, HOW BIG CAN IT GET AND NOT EXHIBIT ANY PROBLEMS?
    ALSO, IF I CREATE ANOTHER LIBRARY FILE AND NAME IT DIFFERENTLY, HOW COULD I HAVE THE SAME PROJECTS, ALBUMS, AND FOLDERS BE IN THE NEW FILE (OF COURSE, WITHOUT ANY OF THEIR PHOTO FILES -- EMPTY SO I CAN ADD TO THEM AS I CONTUNE MANAGING MY PHOTOS?
    I LOVE THIS PROGRAM -- ALTHOUGH IT GIVES ME THE "CIRCULAR RAINBOW" A LOT OF THE TIME.  I'M ASSUMING THIS IS BECAUSE THE FILE IS SO BIG AND MY MACBOOK PRO 17"  IS OVER 2.5 YEARS OLD.  I HAVE THE MAX RAM FOR IT (@ 3GB) AND I RUN DISK UTILITY EVERY OTHER DAY TO REPAIR PERMISSIONS.  I HAVE OVER 400 GB REMAINING ON MY EXTERNAL DRIVE OF ITS MAXIMUM OF 2 TB.  MY MACBOOK'S HARD DRIVE IS 160GB AND HAS ONLY 17GB REMAINING.  THIS IS THE REASON I HAVE TO LOCATE MY LIBRARY FILE (AND MY iTUNES MUSIC FILES) ON EXTERNAL DISKS.
    ANY RESPONSE TO THESE QUESTIONS WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED:
    CREATE A NEW LIBRARY FILE WITH THE SAME STRUCTURE AND MY CURRENT ONE (BUT CONTAINING NO PHOTOS YET)?
    MAXIMUM FILE SIZE OF ANY APERTURE 3.1.2 LIBRARY FILE?
    MINIMIZE "CIRCULAR RAINBOW" ACTIVITY?
    THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
    LARRY W. HAMILTON

    Hi Larry -- welcome to our sunny clearing in the orchard.
    Please don't post in ALL CAPS.  It means you ARE SHOUTING.  There is no reason to shout.  Regularly capitalized text is also easier to read.
    You need more RAM.  Aperture stresses hardware.  4 GB RAM is a working minimum.  If you have only 4 GB you should not run any other programs when Aperture is running.
    Library size, in GB or in number of Images under management, is not a concern as long as you have the storage space.  I have run Libraries of several hundred thousand Images and over 500 GB on machines with 4 GB RAM.
    You should upgrade to the newest Aperture version.  It is 3.2.2.  The upgrade is free for owners of 3.x.
    You should leave at least 15% of your system drive empty -- the OS uses this.  At just 17 GB free on yours, you should open up some more free space.
    Two changes may keep your computer from hanging as much as it does.  In Aperture, turn off sharing Previews, and turn off Faces.  Each of these eats processor cycles.
    Are you connecting your external drive with FW800?  FW400?

  • Aperture Library Size slowing iMac even when Aperture is closed

    I recently purchased an iMac 22 quad core running Lion, with all updates.  It currently has 12GB of Ram, and 190GB free on the hard drive.
    The iMac would load programs like Outlook within a few seconds and was very fast.
    I purchased Aperture and migrated about 38,000 images, using the exisitng file structure from my PC.  This took about 12 hours yo process, update images, etc...
    Even if Aperture is closed, all programs now load much more slowly.  Outlook can take 20-30 seconds to open, and lists of email and contacts now take as much as a minute to load. 
    This is only true for the user account with the Aperture library, as programs for other users seems to work fine.
    I tried running disk utilities, restarting machine, but no difference.
    Activity monitor shows no unusual memory, CPU or disk activity.
    I started a new user account, and all worked fine again...until I again created an aperture library, and again, even if Aperture is not started, everyting else runs slowly.
    Is there a file indexing feature that is overwhelmed by the addition of a large aperture library?  (Deleting the Aperture library doe snot solve the problem-only startign a new user accountdoes).

    dphughes wrote:
    ...in both cases maintaining referenced files stored outside the catalog/library. The Aperture library is 500% the size of the Lightroom catalog - even with restricted preview sizes and no vault.
    If this is true, there must be a logical explanation that is giving Aperture users some benefit for the increased Library size. Sorry been a long time since I looked at Lightroom. Does it store the same size previews and thumbnails as Aperture? Since you are using referenced files and Aperture is using non-destructive edits and even new versions do not create duplicate files (only a new set of pointers to the referenced masters), one would think previews and thumbnails must be handled differently. Since you use both, what could it be?
    The Aperture Vault is a separate library than the Aperture Library so having a Vault of course should not impact the size of the Aperture Library.

Maybe you are looking for