Library Size Limit & Recipient IDs

This looks like a better alternative to services like
yousendit, but I was wondering if the 1GB library size limit will
be retained once the service is out of beta, and if we would be
able to purchase more storage space.
Also, will the recipient always have to create an Adobe ID in
order to retrieve the file? Some of my clients may shy away from
using the service if they have to create an ID. Thanks!

During the beta period the library size is limited to 1GB per
user. We will share additional information regarding storage space,
additional features etc in the next few months.
Regarding the Adobe ID. You clients will need to sign-up for
an Adobe ID if you share a file with them with restricted access.
The service uses the Adobe ID to ensure that only the recipients
with the valid e-mail addresses are allowed to access your shared
documents.

Similar Messages

IPhoto '11 9.2.2 Library Size Limit

Is there a limit for either the size of a Library or the number of photos that can be imported into iPhoto '11 9.2.2?

Would that be a workaround to have more photos in iPhoto?
No. You's still have the same limitation which is probably based on the database limitations for iPhoto. Running iPhoto in referenced mode would be a very fragile setup and it wouldn't take a lot to damage the library and causing you to recreate the library from scratch. It just wouldn't be worth it.
For that many photos Aperture would be better choice or one of the other professional DAM (digital asset management) applications like Media Pro 1. It can handle 128,000 photos per catalog.
Searches can be madet thru multiple catalogs with the results displayed in a temp, new catalog. It's just like it's looking at one big catalog.
It runs in what we know as a referenced mode since all that's included in the catalogs are thumbnails of the photos and all of the metadata (EXIF and ITPC) associated with the files. The catalogs can be viewed with the source files immediately available.
There are other DAM applications available. You can read about them at The DAM Forum.
Media Pro can catalog other file types as described by me in this topic: data management: Apple Support Communities
OT

ITunes Library File Size Limit?

I've been struggling to get my AppleTV to work as advertised since I bought it on the day it was originally released. I'm a big music fan and wanted to use it mostly as a music device. My iTunes library is huge. I have my entire CD collection ripped in lossless, as well as AAC for my iPod. I also have lots of other music, some DTS audio files, etc... and very detailed organization.
At any rate, I could always get the AppleTV to work if I just set it up to sync and play the files locally, but never to properly stream in a manner that's useable. And any syncing would take FOREVER. I'm on an N network, and I was getting speeds around 100KB/second. And then after it finally would get setup, I would often get pauses up to a minute where the AppleTV would freeze between menus while "thinking". It would take me 5 minutes just to navigate to a song and start playing it.
I tried all sorts of troubleshooting. Test libraries always worked fine. I've rebuilt my iTunes library from scratch, suspecting a corrupt library file, even though there was no other evidence to support this theory. No dice.
I'm finally giving up, and deciding that AppleTV has a limit to how large an iTunes library file it can handle. My iTunes library file is 160MB. Just the library file. You figure it's only got 256MB of RAM, and it's no wonder it can't handle it. I'm not sure how large the AppleTV OS is, but I suspect with a library file that large that the ATV has to do lots of going back to the HD to retrieve information it just doesn't have enough room for in RAM.
So my new strategy is to set up a secondary iTunes library just for my AppleTV that contains just music I want to sync, and any video I may want to stream. If I want to stream video, I'll launch this new library. If I want to listen to music without my computer on, the AppleTV will have a selection on it from this new library. If I want to stream my huge library, well, now I can use my iPhone as a remote to control my large iTunes library, and use the AppleTV with airtunes feature. And this works wonderfully, 100% responsive with no "waiting".
At any rate, I'm very disappointed that I couldn't get the AppleTV to work as advertised. I wish Apple would specify that there's a limit to how large a library it can handle. I've been screwing around with this for a long time and am essentially giving up, although the iPhone remote / airtunes solution works well for me.
Maybe down the road they'll come out with a new hardware revision with more RAM that can handle things better.

Well, I was hoping I could send you a private message, Greg Neil, because I don't know if you'll ever see this message. Regardless, your iTunes library is NOT the problem no matter what others have told you. 7000 files it's child's play. My iTunes library currently has 14,639 music files in it and 129 Movies ripped at 3000kbps. The library size is NOT the problem. If your network is slow then that will be what is hurting you. The second fastest behind 'n' (i always forget this bit of trivia) should be fast enough for streaming music and most movies. I know that because I've done it. Having said that, go out and buy a bit of ethernet cable and hook it directly into your machine and see if you can stream that way. If you can't then you need to take back your aTV because, in that case, it's the problem. If your network is of adequate speed per what I and the previous poster have mentioned and it still won't stream at all wirelessly then TAKE IT BACK. Mine has streamed fine in the past however, I eventually just hardwired it via ethernet to prevent any drops ever. Hope this helps. I just wanted you to know that going to that amount of trouble to make it work should not have been necessary, and btw, aTV running all your favorite music to your home stereo is worth the price of the device itself. You shouldn't have to suffer.
All the best,
A fellow music lover

Limit message size per recipient domain

Is there a feature to set maximum message size per recipient domain (incoming emails) in the roadmap maybe?

While you cannot do it by 'domains' for maximum message size limitations, you can limit the connection mail hosts.
IE: domain1.com may use the connecting mail host of mail.domain1.com
domain2.com may use the connection mail host of mx.domain2.com
Then you can create new sendergroups for the respective domains mail servers to match, and with the sendergroup you will need to create a new mail flow policy with the size limits you would like to impose.
Once this is done, simply add the mail.domain1.com into the respective sendergroup and it will impose this limitation.
Key points to note:
Size limits should account for MIME inflation.
IE: 10mb limitation you want to implement should be 14MB on the mail flow policy to account for MIME inflation.
Alternatively, if you would like to do it 'by domain'
SImply increase your mail flow policy for the sendergroup that these domains normally match (under default it would normally be UNKNOWNLIST) and have it at 14MB (to allow for 10MB emails)
Then run a message filter (so it gets actioned at the start)
FilterDomain1:
if (mail-from =="@domain1.com") AND (body-size > 5M)
drop();
Etc. to impose the limits this way.
Note:
Body size refers to the size of the message, including both headers and attachments. The body-size rule selects those messages where the body size compares as directed to a given number.

HT4863 How can I increase the file size limit for outgoing mail. I need to send a file that is 50MB?

How can I increase the file size limit for outgoing mail. I need to send a file that is 50MB?

You can't change it, and I suspect few email providers would allow a file that big. Consider uploading it to a service like Dropbox, then email the link allowing the recipient to download it.

Messaging server size limit

Hallo
As I see, I have common problem among the Sun Messaging Server administrators. I have whole system distributed on several virtual solaris machines and some days ago emerged message size problem. I noticed it in relation with incoming mail. When I create new user, he or she can't get larger mail then 300K. Sender get will known message:
This message is larger than the current system limit or the recipient's mailbox is full. Create a shorter message body or remove attachments and try sending it again.
<server.domain.com #5.3.4 smtp;552 5.3.4 a message size of 302 kilobytes exceeds the size limit of 300 kilobytes computed for this transaction>
Interesting thin is, that this problem arised with no correlation with other actions. I noticed this problem with new users before, but i could successful manage it with different service packs. Now this method with new users, this method doesn't work! Old users normally recieve messages bigger then 300k, as before.
I tried to set default setting blocklimit 2000 in imta.cnf, but I didn't succeed.
I know, that size limit can be set on different places, but is there a simple way, to set sending and recieving message size unlimited?
Messaging server version is:
Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)*
libimta.so 7u2-7.02 64bit (built 03:03:02, Apr 16 2009)*
Using /opt/sun/comms/messaging64/config/imta.cnf (compiled)*
SunOS mailstore 5.10 Generic_138888-01 sun4v sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5120*
Regards
Matej

For the sake of correctness, the attribute name in LDAP is mailMsgMaxBlocks.
I also stumbled upon this - the values like 300 blocks or 7000 blocks are set in (sample) service packages but are not advertised in Delegated Admin web-interface. When packages are assigned, these values are copied into each user's LDAP entry as well, and can not be seen or changed in web-interface.
And then mail users get "weird" errors like:
550 5.2.3 user limit of 7000 kilobytes on message size exceeded: [email protected]
or
550 5.2.3 user limit of 300 kilobytes on message size exceeded: [email protected]
resulting in
<[email protected]>... User unknown
or
552 5.3.4 a message size of 7003 kilobytes exceeds the size limit of 7000 kilobytes computed for this transaction
or
552 5.3.4 a message size of 302 kilobytes exceeds the size limit of 300 kilobytes computed for this transaction
resulting in
Service unavailable
I guess there are other similar error messages, but these two are most common.
I hope other people googling up the problem would get to this post too ;)
One solution is to replace the predefined service packages with several of your own, i.e. ldapadd entries like these (fix the dc=domain,dc=com part to suit your deployment, and both cn parts if you rename them), and restart the DA webcontainer:
dn: cn=Mail-Calendar - Unlimited,o=mailcalendaruser,o=cosTemplates,dc=domain,dc=com
cn: Mail-Calendar - Unlimited
daservicetype: calendar user
daservicetype: mail user
mailallowedserviceaccess: imaps:ALL$pops:ALL$+smtps:ALL$+https:ALL$+pop:ALL$+imap:ALL$+smtp:ALL$+http:ALL
mailmsgmaxblocks: 20480
mailmsgquota: -1
mailquota: -1
objectclass: top
objectclass: LDAPsubentry
objectclass: costemplate
objectclass: extensibleobject
dn: cn=Mail-Calendar - 100M,o=mailcalendaruser,o=cosTemplates,dc=domain,dc=com
cn: Mail-Calendar - 100M
daservicetype: calendar user
daservicetype: mail user
mailallowedserviceaccess: imaps:ALL$pops:ALL$+smtps:ALL$+https:ALL$+pop:ALL$+imap:ALL$+smtp:ALL$+http:ALL
mailmsgmaxblocks: 20480
mailmsgquota: 10000
mailquota: 104857600
objectclass: top
objectclass: LDAPsubentry
objectclass: costemplate
objectclass: extensibleobject
dn: cn=Mail-Calendar - 500M,o=mailcalendaruser,o=cosTemplates,dc=domain,dc=com
cn: Mail-Calendar - 500M
daservicetype: calendar user
daservicetype: mail user
mailallowedserviceaccess: imaps:ALL$pops:ALL$+smtps:ALL$+https:ALL$+pop:ALL$+imap:ALL$+smtp:ALL$+http:ALL
mailmsgmaxblocks: 20480
mailmsgquota: 10000
mailquota: 524288000
objectclass: top
objectclass: LDAPsubentry
objectclass: costemplate
objectclass: extensibleobject
See also limits in config files -
* msg.conf (in bytes):
service.http.maxmessagesize = 20480000
service.http.maxpostsize = 20480000
and
* imta.cnf (in 1k blocks): <channel block definition> ... maxblocks 20000 blocklimit 20000 sourceblocklimit 20000
i.e.:
tcp_local smtp mx single_sys remotehost inner switchchannel identnonenumeric subdirs 20 maxjobs 2 pool SMTP_POOL maytlsserver maysaslserver saslswitchchannel tcp_auth missingrecipientpolicy 0 loopcheck slave_debug sourcespamfilter2optin virus destinationspamfilter2optin virus maxblocks 20000 blocklimit 20000 sourceblocklimit 20000 daemon outwardrelay.domain.com
tcp_intranet smtp mx single_sys subdirs 20 dequeue_removeroute maxjobs 7 pool SMTP_POOL maytlsserver allowswitchchannel saslswitchchannel tcp_auth missingrecipientpolicy 4 maxblocks 20000 blocklimit 20000 sourceblocklimit 20000
tcp_submit submit smtp mx single_sys mustsaslserver maytlsserver missingrecipientpolicy 4 slave_debug maxblocks 20000 blocklimit 20000 sourceblocklimit 20000
tcp_auth smtp mx single_sys mustsaslserver missingrecipientpolicy 4 maxblocks 20000 blocklimit 20000 sourceblocklimit 20000
If your deployment uses other SMTP components, like milters to check for viruses and spam, in/out relays separate from Sun Messaging, other mailbox servers, etc. make sure to use a common size limit.
For sendmail relays sendmail.mc (m4) config source file it could mean lines like these:
define(`SMTP_MAILER_MAX', `20480000')dnl
define(`confMAX_MESSAGE_SIZE', `20480000')dnl
HTH,
//Jim Klimov
PS: Great thanks to Shane Hjorth who originally helped me to figure all of this out! ;)

Is there any size limit for this DB?

Hi,
We have installed SQL Express 2012 DB and configured as a results store for the VSTS 2012 load tests.
Do we have the size restriction of 4 GB to this DB as well? or we dont have any size restriction for this DB?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Y.S.Sridhar

Hi
Express maximum db size limit is 10gb
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc645993(v=SQL.110).aspx
vt
Please mark answered if I've answered your question and vote for it as helpful to help other user's find a solution quicker

Is there a size limit to aperture 3 libraries?

Greetings. I am preparing to merge my (too many) Aperture libararies. Is there a limit to library volume size, or can I just go for it? Thanks, JB

macdabbit wrote:
Greetings. I am preparing to merge my (too many) Aperture libararies. Is there a limit to library volume size...? Thanks, JB
No. But I strongly recommend a referenced-Masters workflow to keep Library size smaller. From a previous post of mine:
Aperture is designed to bite into small chunks at a time, so TBs of data do not bother the app itself. However, handling super-large batches of data on consumer hardware tends to be problematic, it is that simple.
IMO referenced Masters make far more sense than building huge managed-Masters Libraries:
• Hard disk speed. Drives slow as they fill so making a drive more full (which managed Masters always does) will slow down drive operation. Keeping hard drives less than 70% full is a good guideline.
• Database size. Larger databases are by definition more prone to "issues" than smaller databases are.
• Vaults. Larger Library means larger Vaults, and Vaults are an incremental repetitive backup process, so again larger Vaults are by definition more prone to "issues" than smaller Vaults are. One-time backup of Referenced Masters (each file small, unlike a huge managed-Masters DB) is neither incremental nor ongoing; which is by definition a more stable process.
Managed-Masters Libraries can work, but they cannot avoid the basic database physics.
Note that whether managed or referenced, original images should be separately backed up prior to import into Aperture or any other images management application. IMO after backing up each batch of original images importing that batch into Aperture as a new Project by reference makes by far the most sense. Building a huge managed Library or splitting into multiple smaller Libraries is less logical.
HTH
-Allen

Itunes Library Size / Unlimited Online Storage

Hi
- I have a question regarding Itunes library size.
I have a couple of movies, some music and even TV series on my itunes library and its slowly getting bigger and bigger.
Is there a certain limit for the itunes library size?
And if so, does apple support any kind of Online private storage where you can store your music library?

'iTunes in the Cloud' provides the ability for devices to re-download songs you have already purchased. There is no equivalent facility for movies or TV. There is no charge for this service.
'iTunes Match' enables you to upload from your own files songs you have obtained elsewhere than in the iTunes Store. The cost is $25 p.a. and there is a limit of 2,500 songs. Again, there is no equivalent facility for movies or TV.
iCloud does not provide general online storage. While there are other online storage services, if your library is very large you would find it impracticable to upload it even if you could find a service offering sufficient space.
Hard disks are not particularly expensive and your best bet would be to transfer your library to one.

Mailbox database admission control by maximum mailboxdatabase size limit

I would like to have a feature which allowes to set a maximum size limit on a mailboxdatabase. This way we can keep the mailboxdatabases around a certain size. Existing mailboxex within the mailboxdatabase can grow according to their sizing
limits but no new mailboxes can be added or moved to it. In collaboration with the new automatic distribution feature you can migrate more efficiently and keep maintenance and restores times low.

Hello,
Accroding to your description, I understand that you want to set a maximum size limit on a mailboxdatabase. Your purpose for this doing is that existing mailboxes size within the mailboxdatabase can grow, but new mailboxes can't be added or
moved to it? If so, I'm afraid that there is no way to set a maximum size limit on a mailboxdatabase in exchange 2013 server. But we can control automatic mailbox distribution sing database scopes.
Here is an article for your reference.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff628332(v=exchg.150).aspx
If I have any misunderstanding, please free let me know.
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here
Cara Chen
TechNet Community Support

Aperture library size vs iphoto

My aperture library and iphoto library have the same photos in them. Photos seem to be the same size and quality (I imported all photos from aperture into iPhoto). iPhoto's library is 20GB, Aperture is nearly 60. I'm guessing that while Aperture might be a hair bigger because of the previews (default settings there), 3x the size means something is wrong.
Is there a way to rebuild the Aperture library without losing all my albums/libraries?
While 60GB isn't the end of the world, I'm trying to move my photos to my laptop. And between photos and music, I'm really pushing my hard drive's capacity. That 40GB difference is going to mean I'll use iPhoto (09) vs Aperture (2), and I'm still partial to Aperture.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
Message was edited by: unleashed

Thanks everyone for their help. Redoing the previews helped. I think I had the previews set to "do not limit" on my dekstop and had just pulled the aperture library to my laptop. Redoing those previews took 20GB off my library size.
I see where you're coming from with the referenced images, but for now, it just keeps things simpler for my to keep it all managed. It's a brilliant solution though, if I need to in the future I might go that route. Especially when you think about possibilities with having the referenced images on Time Capsule or something. I don't take that many photos, and I upgrade my computer every year or two. I'm hoping the laptop hard drive space will expand gradually with my photo and music library, and by the time I have to worry about it, there will be another solution.
As far as how I went from Aperture to iPhoto (Ernie), I did (from iPhoto) file > show aperture library > then pulled them all in. I know there are issues with this though, you might check the iPhoto forum if you have trouble, there are work-arounds I believe.

Error 4.7.1 message exceeds size limit, but it doesnt

I am receiving this error every time I try to send a message.
The size of the message you are trying to send exceeds a temporary size limit of the server. The message was not sent; try to reduce the message size or wait some time and try again. The server responded: 4.7.1 <[email protected]>: Recipient address rejected: [email protected] exceeded daily recipients threshold . See http://postmaster.frontiernet.net.
This happened randomly and without provocation. I have talked to my mail provider and they are telling me that it is an internal error. They have checked my connection settings and everything is set up properly. The messages i am sending are just test messages with one word in them.

Did your provider also tell you that mime encoded attachments are about 30% larger than the original file size of the attachment. So a 4Mb attachment would exceed a 5Mb limit.

Maximum iTunes Library Size?

Hi all,
I've searched the discussions and have found some info, but wondered it there was anything definitive on whether there is a "maximum size" limit in iTunes.
I've got a ton of music, all managed w/in iTunes. Currently 153GB and growing, over 2800 albums. The G5 has enough muscle to manage it, but it does take a bit longer to launch iTunes than it did a year ago. Sharing the library via AE with iTunes on my wife's PC takes 1-2 minutes to load.
I don't even try and launch iTunes on my Mac anymore if my iPod is attached beforehand... it will just sit there. Detach the iPod and iTunes launches properly, then I attach my iPod. This didn't happen when my library was much smaller, altho this could be a function of upgrading iTunes to v5.0, the June'05 iPod updater or other variables.
Just curious, wondering if I'm approaching some unspoken limit.

Well, I have 36k songs filling up 292gigs of space on my main machine spread over 4 drives. [G4 DP 867] PLUS I have 34gigs of music on my old G4 400 that I have networked to my iTunes library--for rarely played tunes.
I do experience 1 or 2 second gaps in the middle of songs sometimes, but that is rare. Sharing the library onto my iBook over airport takes about the same time as you describe
I did have the problem with the machine hanging, sometimes even just dying, several months ago when the iPod [an old 5 gig] was attached and iTunes was not running. I fixed the problem, but can't remember what did it. I know that I restored the iPod software about that time, and also rebuilt my library. [I had a hard drive that was loosing/corrupting data so I moved everything off of it, formatted it and then moved the data back.]
I wish I could specifically remember what fixed it, but the above is all I can remember. Everything works great now.
Good luck Christopher

Checking Maximum size limit of SQL-SERVER database.

It is said that EXPRESS version of SQL server has SIZE_limit.. How can i check what size limit my database has using Management_studio_express??

It is said that EXPRESS version of SQL server has SIZE_limit.. How can i check what size limit my database has using Management_studio_express??
Yes it has limitations regarding CPU ,memory and database size.You can refer to below link
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc645993.aspx
Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers
How do i check what is the size limit of my database??
Common please do some basic reading before asking question.I am not discouraging you from posting but search not net how to find size of my SQL Server database you will get lots of link.Max size of your database will be max size supported by edition of SQL
Server in your case since it is express 2008 r2 it will be 10 G.For current size please do as advised above
Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers

File size limit on export doesn't.

I have an export option for a photo forum I post to, where the size limit is 200kb. I have set 200kb, 600x600 JPG as the export limits, and I routinely get files much bigger, memory-wise, than that, up to 260kb.
I can set the export dimension limit to 500x500, and still get files over 200kb. Today, after a file went to 260kb at 600x600, I set the dimension limit to 500x500, and the exported file size did not change: at 500x500, it was still a 260kb file. If I go through and tweak compression by hand, on every photo, or set a file size limit of 150kb, I can get under 200kb per file.
I've tried files where I set the limit from 200, to 190, to 180, to 170, and see no change in the exported file (still well over 200 in size), and then when I set it to 160 it jumps down to 150-160 in size. If the file was only 210kb on export with the 200kb limit, setting it to 180kb will generally get the file under 200kb.
Really, the file size limit does not do what it purports to do. It can clearly get the file below that size if I direct it by hand every time: I haven't specified anything that would artificially bulk the file up, like a quality setting that would be incompatible with the file size limit. It's free to compress the file as needed to meet the limit.
What I want it to do is meet the limit I set for it. I shouldn't have to dance around. I have this export setting for the express purpose of quickly producing under-200kb files, and I sort of expect Lightroom to manage it.

I've had this problem too, but it isn't the only one when creating small jpeg files from LR.
There is something seriously amiss in the export module. I also create a lot of 600 pixel wide/high files and not only are the file sizes far too high, but the quality is poor. I have two workarounds for this, both of which add a little time to the job, but make a big difference.
First is to export my files as full size jpegs (which I do anyway,) LR does a good job with these. Then get another programme to batch process these to give me the small sRGB files I also need!
Second is to use LR's web module and create a basic html site for a batch of images in a folder in a temp directory at the precise size I want. This has the advantage that I can add a watermark. Then just rename and move the folder containing the images from the web folder that has been created to where I want them, followed by deleting the rest of the web folder.
Working at low quality (38%) from the Export module gave me a file size for one image of 455KB. So then I told it to export at a max of 200KB, and it came out at 565KB. Using the web module with quality set at 70 gave a higher quality result and a file size of 105KB!
The problem seems to be worse on images where I've done quite a bit of work using local adjustments - rather as if they are actually performing these on the small jpeg and re-saving each time. Certainly something going very wrong - just like it was in LR2.x and I think it must be a logical error as presumably the web module uses the same library to create jpegs.

Library Size Limit & Recipient IDs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for