License for datacenter usage?

Hi,
Im a bit confused about the usage of solaris 10 and other sun software (all use the same license almost) in a datacenter for internet applications:
the following paragraphs say its only allowed on an extranet deployment or am i wrong?
d) Commercial Use. You may use Software internally for
your own commercial purposes.
(e) Service Provider Use. You may make Software
functionality accessible (but not by providing Software
itself or through outsourcing services) to your end users in
an extranet deployment, but not to your affiliated companies
or to government agencies.

I am not a lawyer, but I read that as do not give the software to other people except your employees. I do not think it has anything to do with what kind of application you use it for. I beleive sun would be thrilled if you used sol 10 for the purpose you mention. (and then purchase a service contract).

Similar Messages

  • REMOTE DESKTOP SERVICES CLIENT ACCESS LICENSES FOR MICROSOFT WINDOWS SERVER 2012 STANDARD AND DATACENTER

    I am using a window 7 professional  service pack 1 and I purchase REMOTE DESKTOP SERVICES CLIENT ACCESS LICENSES FOR MICROSOFT WINDOWS SERVER 2012 STANDARD AND DATACENTER. but  the seller did not send me any installation CD or instruction
    on how to use it.
     Please how can I use it on my window 7 professional  service pack 1.
    Thank you.

    Though Bill is absolutely correct for most CALs, Remote Desktop Services does have its own special licensing server.  I haven't installed one on 2012, yet, but here is a step-by-step guide for 2008. 
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd983943(v=ws.10).aspx
    Here is a lab guide for 2012 -
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj134160.aspx
    But, the explanation of your environment begs the question - what are you trying to do?  You say you have a desktop OS and you are talking about Windows Server products.  In that light, your question does not make a lot of sense.
    . : | : . : | : . tim

  • Is it possible to install a consumer app for mass usage that would alter the ios device proxy settings? Over the air not supervised. Can an app company use an MDM server to do this if the customer consents?

    Is it possible to install a consumer app for mass usage that would alter the ios device proxy settings? Over the air not supervised. Can an app company use an MDM server to do this if the customer consents?

    HI Chris,
    Thanks for taking the time to reply.
    Could you expand on your answer, which bit is very doubtful?
    Also in your knowledge would Apple work with a company and license it if the software they were developing was desired by consumer demand?
    Thanks
    Gary

  • Licensing for Guests OS

    Hello, 
    We are planning to move to Windows Server 2012 DataCanter Edition, and we are aware it suppports unlimited guests OS and it will provide us also free multiple Activation keys, what if we install Windows Server 2008 R2 edition and Windows Server 2003 R2,
    the  free activation keys will work with these or we need to hae  separate licenses for these versions, does it mean the free activation keys will work only on Server  2012  Edtitions alone?.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    if you have the Datacenter Edition  you can have the right for Downgrade, depends sometime on the Edition, OEM, with SA etc...
    If you have the right you are allowed to install VM with the DC Edition of the Version and all older Versions and Editions like 2012 Std. and/or 2008R2 and 2003 etc...
    You need the Media and License Key, how to get it for odler Version if you do not have one, check with your local Microsoft Contact or Dealer.
    Since 2012R2 you have the new Feature "Automatic Virtual Machine Activation", means a VM is automatically activated if it runs on a Host with activated DC License.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn303421.aspx
    It only works with 2012R2 Versions !!!
    helps a little bit ?
    Check fot PUR - Product Use Rights and/or "downgrade rights", here as a example for OEM License
    http://www.microsoft.com/OEM/en/licensing/sblicensing/Pages/downgrade_rights.aspx#fbid=sEi3ogMVhwK

  • Sound effect licensed for commercial use?

    Are the sound effects licensed for commercial and distribution usage? thanks.
      Mac OS X (10.4.10)  

    Found this eventually.
    http://images.apple.com/finalcutstudio/docs/20070415FinalCut_Studio_2_ProductOverview.pdf
    On page 44 of that apple PDF it states:
    “Soundtrack Pro 2 includes a library of more than 1000 royalty-free surround music beds and sound effects. These professionally produced and recorded elements make it easy
    to get started fast and keep quality high when you create a surround sound mix. The library also includes 5000 royalty-free Foley, sound effect, and music segments for stereo use. Easily add third-party music and effect libraries when you want more options.”

  • Is it required separate License for Adobe Test & Target?

    Hello Team,
    I want to implement Adobe Test & Target for that is it requried to purchase separate License for that or it is included in CQ5 bundle?
    Or is it required any things separate account for mbox?
    Is it required separate License for Author and Publish instances? or we can use same for both?
    Thank you so much in advance...
    Regards,
    Satish

    Test & Target is software as a service, so you don't license per instance the way CQ is licensed, you pay for your usage. I am not familar with all the options, but believe it's based on how many mBox requests you run.
    There are integrations to Test and Target within CQ I am honestly not sure if those are licensed in their own module or are part of a base license, you would be best off consulting with your company account representive to find out.

  • VDA licensing for Virtual Desktops

    Hi,
    I always seem to browse thru the VDA Faq everytime I need to do up a proposal for a Desktop Virtualization solution.  Can anyone clarify some things that are vague for me right now.
    1) If current environment all users use OEM machines with Windows XP, say VDI is rolled out using Windows 7.  We know we would need to get the VDA license per device that is about to access the Virtual Desktops.  But how about the Windows 7 Base
    OS license itself?  Is there a need to buy 1 Volume License Windows 7 media when preparing the master image using that OS?
    2) How does the VDA usage rights extend when the users primary using it, goes home and uses their own home PCs to connect back to their virtual desktops?  Do we need to get another VDA license for that use?
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    Please check the following link:
    Licensing Windows
    for Virtual Desktops Whitepaper
    Licensing Windows for VDI Environments
    Hope it helps.
    Alex Zhao
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

  • Can we use Adobe Creative Suite (student version) CS4 and CS5 for commercial usage in Australia?

    Can we use Adobe Creative Suite (student version) CS4 and CS5 for commercial usage in Australia?
    Can we use for commercial purposes while we are studying?
    How about after we graduate?
    Thank you.

    Check your regional S&T pages for specifics. Generally commercial usage is allowed during school and after graduating, but in some regions extra restrictions may apply if e.g. your software is subsidized by your government or the license owned by the school and you just "loaned" it.
    Mylenium

  • Configuration Manager & Licenses for AIX, Linux

    All,
    I have read the SCCM 2012 licensing document (System Center
    2012 Licensing Pricing and SKU Overview) but I'm still unable to understand the content. Does one pay, having a datacenter license, for every configuration manager client used on each device (based on cpu) and does this also count for the SCOM
    client?Or having paid for the scom client means that the configuration manager client is covered as well.
    Also, how does this model applies when installing a client on an AIX LPAR which is part of a Power 5 or Power 6 system. (with for example 64 cpu's). Does this simply mean the need to have 32 CAL's ?
    Bit confused about the following statement in the document "SC 2012 Datacenter allows for any # of managed OSEs per license."
    thanks

    Hi,
    to get a valid legal answer, I would recommend to contact your licensing Partner.
    But from my Point of view:
    You are right, for the Server with 64 cpu's, you will Need 32 System Center 2012 R2 Datacenter/Standard Server Management Licenses. But then, all available Clients are usable (SCOM, SCCM, DPM)
    The Statement simply means: When you have a datacenter license, which only has to cover the requirements of the cpu's, it doesn't matter, how many virtualized Systems (OSE) are running on this Server, on all of those OSE's you can use the System
    Center Clients (or manage them without). Other than with Standard, where you got to check, if you have to license the cpu's or the OSE's.
    I hope I could Point that out.
    www.sccmfaq.ch

  • License for students

    I want to buy creative suit for students (in Poland) and i want to know if the license is pernament or it's only for some peroid of time? in shop they told me that it is pernament but on Adobe's website i read that i can use this program for one year.

    You will have to check the specifics for edu usage on your regional pages or your specific versions of the EULA. Generally commercial use is allowed, but in some countries where the government pay subsidies to finance student software it may not be possible.
    Mylenium

  • Need help with recomendations on licenses for Server 2012 Std R2

    I have a client who wants to purchase a server from me. I can buy the parts and assemble the system no problem. But I'm a newbie when it comes to user CALs or device CALs. The company will be having about 50 computers connecting to it. I'm assuming they'll
    just be using the standard user/password domain login.
    What else would I need to purchase in addition to the OS?
    What kind of features does the vanilla server OS give you? Can 50 computers connect to just the OS alone? I've seen places that have a 1 user CAL for $36. Do I need 50 of these? If I don't purchase them right away, could my client still connect their computers
    to the server?
    mr.t

    Hello,
    Licensing Windows Server 2012 comes in four different flavours foundation, essentials, standard and datacenter.
    Your client is wanting connect 50 users which really does rule out two of those flavours.
    Essentials is ruled out because it is an OEM operating system and only supports up to 15 users and has limited functionality
    Foundation is rules out because it only supports up to 25 users and has limited functionality
    This leaves us with two Windows Server 2012 flavours you can purchase Standard or Datacenter.  They both have exactly the same functionality; the difference is the virtualisation
    rights.  With standard one license covers two physical processors and supports two virtual machines, if you need more virtual machines then you would have to buy another standard license and giving the right to four virtual machines for example.  Then
    for datacenter license covers two physical processors and covers you for an unlimited amount of virtual operating systems.
    To make this hopefully easier:
    1 x standard license covers = 2 x physical processors – 2 x virtual operating systems environments
    1x datacenter license covers = 2 x physical processors – unlimited virtual operating environments 
    Both Standard and Datacenter come with Full functionality
    Meaning standard licensing is really for no or very limited virtual environments, then if you are looking in to a virtual environment Datacenter is the way to go.
    On regards to CALS are required for every user or device accessing the server.  They/you will need to decide whether or not you go for Device or user CALs.  User CAL
    is more expensive but it gives companies a lot more flexible if the users are running more than one device for example if they support a bring your own device strategy.  Although there are different types of CALS depending on what the customer will be
    looking to use and access. 
    Also can your user still connect to the server: technically speaking yes, CALS are not like license keys you cannot activate them it is effectively a piece of
    paper to say you have purchased X amount CALS and your compliant to allow your users to connect. So you can connect with out purchasing but you will not be compliant from a licensing standpoint.
    Hope this helps to some degree!
    Cheers,
    Harry

  • License for oaf customization

    Hi All,
    I need to do couple R12 OAF customizations for my client. Should my client need to pay for JDeveloper license fee? I checked Oracle JDeveloper web site, it says JDeveloper is free but there is also a line mention about not for commercial usage.
    So, just want to confirm that if my client puts my code into production, then they have to pay JDeveloper license fee, right?
    Regards,
    KJ

    Hi,
    The JDeveloper IDE is free and the client has to pay no licence for this. Note that this is for the IDE, the development environment, not the runtime usage of frameworks like TopLink.
    Frank

  • License for Discovery System V3

    Hi All,
    we want to buy Discovery System V3 but we have a doubt about the license. Infact we haven't any license for MaxDB because it isn't licensed under the our installation number. So we have need a new installation number (such as demo license) and then pay for it. Is it correct?
    Thank you in advance?
    Regards
    Bob

    >
    Itai Sadan wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > If you are licensed for SAP ERP or Business Suite, your account executive can work with the contracting department  to make sure that the MaxDB segment is either added to an existing installation number or a new installation number will be created for you. Please note that usage of MaxDB will be provided to you on an evaluation basis. 
    >
    > Should you need further support for the Discovery System please open a CSN ticket on component CA-SOA-DS.
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Itai
    >
    > Edited by: Itai Sadan on Jun 16, 2008 4:49 PM
    Itai,
    How long we can use MaxDB on an evaluation basis?
    Thanks
    Bala

  • License for RAS SDK

    Hi,
    My client is using CRS XIR2. They do not have Crystal Report Explorer license.
    They want to have adhoc capability using the CRS XI2. I know with CRE it is easy but is there any other way to provide adhoc capability maybe using SDK.
    I got to know that by using RAS SDK you can create crystal report and provide adhoc.
    My plan is to create some template reports and using SDK select the fields and prompts. Using the selected fields and prompts run these template reports.
    Hence I wanted to know if there is a separate license that is required for using RAS SDK? Or the CRSXIR2 license itself provides the capability to create dynamic reports?
    Appreciate your response.
    Rahul

    The license for Crystal Reports Server includes the usage of the RAS server - which allows you to do ad-hoc reporting.  If you want to use the RCAPI API's (Report Creation API), you will either need to use RAS, or you will need to use .NET with SP2 installed.  (SP2 enables RCAPI for regular non-enterprise .NET apps)
    Unfortunately this capability is not yet available in the JRC (it is planned though).
    So to summarize:
    1. CR Server includes the license to use the RAS server and to do RCAPI
    2. If you don't want to use the RAS server, you can use .NET with XI R2 SP2 installed.
    a programmer learning programming from perl is like a chemisty student learning the definition of "exothermic" with dynamite

  • What is the license for the MH DDK?

    Hello,
    I am hoping to include a simple driver for the PCI-6220 acquisition card in a software distribution.  I would like to know what the license is for the whole DDK?  Usually this information is present in the download of the source code, but I saw no LICENSE.txt file or anything similar.  The only information I have found is that the Linux 2.6 kernel portion of the driver is licensed under BSD (in the NI-MHDDK Readme file).  However, there is no license for the rest of the package.  Is this code freely modifiable and redistributable?
    Thank you.

    Hello, I've just hit on another license-related issue.
    I've developing some Linux software on top of the NIRLP driver, using the NIMHDDK (osiBus) layer.
    So far so good.  However, in modifying the NIRLP driver I've hit a legal wall:
    You claim that the NIRLP driver is licensed with BSD:
    ftp://ftp.ni.com/support/daq/mhddk/readme.htm
    However, the MODULE_LICENSE line in nirlpk.c says the following:
    MODULE_LICENSE("Copyright (c) 2006 National Instruments Corporation.  All Rights Reserved.");
    Which does not specify BSD.  In any case, it hasn't been a problem since Linux has technically allowed linking against non-GPL licensed code.
    However, there has been a movement to start marking new functions exported in the kernel API as "GPL-only" symbols.
    I started modifying NIRLP to announce itself on sysfs, so that it would be noticed by udev and show up under /dev automatically.
    This requires calling the function "class_create()".  When I compiled the module calling this function, I got the following error:
    make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.24.4-64.fc8-i686'
      Building modules, stage 2.
      MODPOST 1 modules
    FATAL: modpost: GPL-incompatible module nirlpk.ko uses GPL-only symbol 'class_create'
    make[2]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
    make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2
    make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.24.4-64.fc8-i686'
    make: *** [default] Error 2
    So, technically it is now a bit of a problem that the module is BSD-licensed, since it is impossible to mark the module GPL in order to bypass this error.  (BSD is techically incompatible with GPL.)  The kernel documentation recommends that BSD code intended to be used in the kernel should be dual-licensed as BSD/GPL:
    http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/
    I highly recommend that NI consider dual-licensing the NIRLP driver for Linux if they intend to support it further, or allow their customers to modify it.  I believe this would be in the spirit of the original license, but would allow better integration with the direction in which Linux is moving.  Currently I'll have to instruct my users to manually create a device node instead of having it appear automatically, which is slightly annoying in terms of usage.
    Thanks,
    Steve

Maybe you are looking for