License question for Flexbuilder 3

I am taking over on a small project and due to legacy purposes and customer requirements, we're still on Flexbuilder 3. The previous developer left me the Flexbuilder 3 licence key, but when I go to use that key, apparently it's only an upgrade key from Flexbuilder 2. I don't have the original Flexbuilder 2 key.
Anyone know if I have any options to use my license short of having to buy a whole new one? Upgrading to Flashbuilder 4.5 is definitely not an option at this point.

I doubt that there would be any problem with you using ARD to connect to a system owned by a family member. The terminology used in the license presumes that ARD is, as is most common, owned by a corporation or institution rather than an individual. But a lot of people use ARD to help family members and I've never heard of Apple protesting, so I think you'd be fine.
Note, though, that no one here can officially speak for Apple, so take our comments with that in mind.

Similar Messages

Licensing question for AD enterprise with new SQL Server

Hi!
We have Server 2008 R2 STD where our AD is located and it has enough User CAL's. Additionally we have Terminal server with TS licenses.
Now we're purchasing a Server 2012 where we plan to install SQL Server 2012 STD where we will install our third party program and this program is going to be used through Terminal server.
Now the question is do I only need SQL CAL's or will I have to get both SQL CAL's AND User CAL's for the new server? I'm thinking AD servers User CAL's is enough for the whole enterprise, but I'm not 100% sure and need help with this!
Thanks!

Licensing questions should be directed to trained Microsoft licensing specialists instead of a technical forum.
www.microsoft.com/licensing.
That said, SQL CALs and operating system CALs are sold separately. Talk with the vendor from whom you are purchasing your licenses. They should be able to help you sort out the CAL questions.
. : | : . : | : . tim

Quick Time 7 Software License Question for multiple PC's

I just purchased Quick Time 7 for my pc, am I able to use this single purchase to put it on my other 2 pc's or do I need to buy all new license software for each?

Microsoft does not provide support for the Crystal Reports products because Crystal Reports are SAP products, （http://support.microsoft.com/kb/317789）and we're not familiar with the license issue of this
product, I think you might need help in this SAP products support forum
http://scn.sap.com/community/support
Thanks for your understanding.
NOTE
This
response contains a reference to a third party World Wide Web site. Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you.
Microsoft
does not control these sites and has not tested any software or information found on these sites.
Yolanda Zhu
TechNet Community Support

License Question for SharePoint Foundation 2010

I have a question as it regards to the user agreement for SharePoint Foundation 2010.
When I deploy code to the front-end of the Foundation service which directly modifies the code on the front-end to make the system do anything different out of the box, does this mean I have violated the code agreement.
For instance, using JQuery to manipulate the look and feel of a form, use third party tools like SPServices, attach SharePoint Designer workflows, modify the server end by using STSADM command line to turn features on and off, create and deploy site
collection features using Visual Studio, or create web parts?
Also, if I am using this software for business purposes of any kind, does it mean I need to purchase the software?
I have received a copy of Share Foundation along with a Server 2008 R2 OS which was purchased.
IF I use Foundation to run my business processes, am I in violation of the user agreement and do I need to purchase SharePoint Server 2010 with CALs?

The official answer: "I'm not a licensing person. Please contact Microsoft."
In general:
Foundation is a "free" download, but can only be installed on Windows Server. You can install Foundation 2010 on Windows 7, but only for testing/development, not as a production server.
Foundation is "free" in that it is licensed as part of the Windows Server it is installed on.
If you have 500 users, then Windows Server will need to be licensed for 500 users. The Windows Server licensing will also depend on if the users are internal or on the internet.
SQL Server: If you are using SQL Express, then no license costs, but the number of SharePoint users may impact the licensing costs of your SQL Server.
The choice between Foundation vs. Standard or Enterprise is the list of features needed and scalability (how many users?).
"JQuery, SPServices, SharePoint Designer workflows, STSADM, Visual Studio..."
None of those will impact your licensing. Anything that you do to directly query or manipulate the SQL tables will impact your support. SharePoint is a platform and you are expected to configure and customize it.
Mike Smith TechTrainingNotes.blogspot.com
Books:
SharePoint 2007 2010 Customization for the Site Owner,
SharePoint 2010 Security for the Site Owner

Licensing question for apple support

Posting this here as I cannot find a support email address anywhere.
I have bought one batch of songs from itunes with the intent to convert them to mp3pro files. The official line seems to be Burn them to cd then rip them as if it's a store bought CD. Because I am working with 100 songs at a time this was a very tedious process. I found a piece of software that converted them from m4p directly to mp3 by playing them through my sound card and perfectly preserved the id3 tags. The tags btw were non existent using the burn method making the tedium exponentially worse.
I cannot find any wording in the apple licensing to prevent this but would like to know their official position.
These will never be shared or given away, the question is purely about one method vs another of reaching a common goal.

Simply put, it is possible but not practical to use an Apple TV with a standard definition TV. The long version:
Apple TV is designed for widescreen TV's, either ED (extended definition) or HD (high definition). However, it does support 480i (NTSC) & 576i (PAL) output formats, which are standard TV broadcast formats.
The problem is few standard TV's accept component inputs (the three cable, luminance & color difference signals the Apple TV outputs, not to be confused with the RGB component standard supported by some SCART TV's), so you generally would need a fairly expensive converter to make these signals compatible with a standard TV.
Even so, unless your TV has a high performance RGB or component input, or a DVI or at least VGA input, the results will be unacceptable, since composite or S-Video inputs of standard TV's lack the bandwidth necessary to display Apple TV's high resolution images without smearing, color fringing, & other visual artifacts.
Also, Apple TV cannot play DVD's -- it has no DVD player built-in & no support to display DVD's running on a host computer.
So, one alternative is to buy a video-capable iPod & a dock, which outputs standard definition video. This is more expensive than an Apple TV but probably not more expensive than one plus the converter you will likely need, & of course gives you a portable video device.
Another alternative is to buy a compatible display, which could be a widescreen computer monitor with a DVI input. You could also burn some of your content to CD's & DVD's & use them in an inexpensive DVD player along with a standard TV.

Important licensing question for Adobe CS6 Production Premium (Student-Licensing)

Hello dear Community!
I have a very small film production and live in a flat share with students as my roommates. One of my associates is a good friend of mine and is also very interested in movie- and film-editing.
He also asked me what softwares are available for editing movies properly so I told him about Adobe and its products especially because of the fact that I'm looking forward to purchase a licence in the future. For now I'm editing in LightWorks (Free-Version).
The fact is that we realized that we would be able to afford the CS6 ProductionPremium-Suite Student-Edition together. He as a student would buy the product and us it as well. (http://www.adobe.com/education/products/creativesuite/production.edu.html?showEduReq=no)
But the question is:
Could I (as a small signed business) also use this purchased product for my commercial business and works?
I'm really honest with this question.
Thank you guys for your answers!

Could I (as a small signed business) also use this purchased product for my commercial business and works?
No. But your room mate can.
Mylenium

Licensing question for managing web services within OC4J

I was wondering if there is a separate license cost to run/manage/secure web services running in OC4J under OAS 10g Enterprise Edition?
thanks

The OC4J 10.1.3.4 release has moved the out of the box libraries OC4J supplies for JAX-RPC/WS into a named/versioned shared-library called "oracle.ws.jaxrpc".
This means you can now easily "unimport" these out of the box implementation from the view of an application, and replace them with newer implementations such as that provided by the Apache CXF distribution by publishing it as a corresponding shared-library and importing that into the application.
See the documentation for 10.1.3.4 which describes this: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12524_01/web.1013/e12290/opensrc.htm#BABDDAIF
-steve-

CC Licensing Question for Complete Individual Membership

Does the CC licensing terms permit multiple immediate family members in the same household to use any of the CC apps on the same one (or two) computers?
For example, my wife will primarily use Photoshop, Illustrator, inDesign, Acrobat and Premiere Pro. I, however, will only use Lightroom and occassionally Photoshop. Are we permitted to have one Complete Individual Membership if we will both be using these on the same (or perhaps two) computers?

For what it's worth, I agree.
I had been a happy user of PhotoShop since version 6, buying upgrades every few years, until I went to upgrade from CS4 to version CS6 and saw that they dropped that upgrade option.
We are a family that occasionally uses these kinds of tools -- three creative kids, a photo/picture editor, and a hobby game developer. Occasional use of PhotoShop, Illustrator, and perhpas Premiere comes up.
Now, one of the children has an educational subscription, but that won't even let all three kids use the software on their computers, much less the rest of the family.
If we were to pay the way Adobe seems to currently intend, we'd sign up for two "pro" subscriptions (at $50/month each) and three "student" subscriptions (at $20/month each.) That would cost us $160/month, or about $2,000 per year. That's enough to buy new laptops for the entire family every year! While I do value software, I'd like to submit that, for family use, the current Adobe plans only make sense for "the 1%."
I'd be happy if the $20/month covered the machines of all the kids in the house. I might be able to stretch the budget to $50/month if it covered all the machines in the house. (Even though I'm pissed that my upgrade path for Photoshop was cut off last year.)
As it is now, we learn to use the Gimp, and Paint.NET, and Inkscape. I'd rather pay an amount of money that I can justify, and stick with Adobe, but that's not currently in the cards.

Licensing question for MHP and HAVi

Hi,
I'm reading license terms from DVB-MHP and HAVi web sites, but I'm not sure about who has to pay the license and royalties: set-top-box producers or developers?
Regards,
Marcos Henke from Brazil

Via Licensing (www.vialicensing.com) is the company that handles the licensing of the MHP patents on behalf of the patent holders.
The licensing situation in MHP is a complex one; STB manufacturers have to pay a per-box royalty, while broadcasters transmitting MHP applications also have to pay a fee in some cases. For the broadcasters, the fee depends on the number of subscribers, and whether or not the broadcaster is transmitting free-to-air MHP services or not.
http://www.vialicensing.com/licensing/MHP_fees.cfm gives details of the MHP licensing costs.
One place where you may get real world feedback on the process is the official MHP forum (http://www.mhp.org/forum/forum.xml)

Oracle 10g Licensing question for Dataguard

Could some one please let me know if a 10g database with a 10g logical standby database and a 10g Physical standby database requires a dataguard license.
thanks heaps

Hello
if you have Oracle enterprise editon you can use dataguard free
but dont mind if you have 1 Prod 1 phy standby you must have 2 Oracle license
Regards
Zekeriya Besiroglu

Instant Client SQL*Plus License Question

Can anyone shed some light on a license question for me? (I know that most license questions are for Oracle Sales to handle, but this involves a supposedly free product.)
I want to use SQL*Plus with the Instant Client in a production environment, but I am not sure whether I am entitled to. Does Instant Client "support" SQL*Plus only in the sense that if I already own a license for SQL*Plus I can use it with the Instant Client, or is the Instant Client SQL*Plus package also truly free to deploy and use?
The download page has links to download a basic Instant Client, plus several optional packages, one of which is SQL*Plus. However, the FAQ does not tell me whether the optional packages (specifically SQL*Plus) is also free to deploy and use in a production environment, and I could not find any other helpful document.
The FAQ says that "Instant Client is FREE for anyone to use in a development or production environment." It also says immediately following that "Instant Client can be used to run your OCI, OCCI, Pro*C, JDBC, and ODBC applications without installing a full Oracle Client. In addition, Instant Client supports SQL*Plus." [emphasis mine]
I would appreciate any help on this.
Thanks in advance,
Anthony

Why don't you call Oracle sales? I guess they'll be happy to answer your question.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe

Lumira Server for BI Platform and Team/Edge consumption & licensing question

Hi. I have a few questions.
Question 1:
From my reading, I've heard that Lumira Edge/Team server may not be a part of BI-Suite License. I read a Lumira Server ASUG Webcast recap by Tammy Powlas here (SAP Lumira Server for Teams Roadmap ASUG Webcast) over the weekend and one of the Q&A questions struck me:
Q: Is this included with the BI Suite license from SAP?
A: Lumira Server for Teams (Edge Edition) is not covered under BI Suite License. However, Lumira Server for BI Platform (RTC Planned in April) is covered under BI Suite licenses
In a separate conversation late 2014, I thought I'd heard that Lumira Team/Edge server was supposed to be usable by BI Suite licensed customers, but it sounds like I'm mistaken?
Question 2:
Next, the second part of the statement gave me hope:
However, Lumira Server for BI Platform (RTC Planned in April) is covered under BI Suite licenses
I then looked at the Lumira Deployment Options for Departments Part 1 – ASUG Webcast by Tammy Powlas to get some more information on Lumira Server for BI Platform. This slide gave me some hope (emphasis mine in green):
But then I see some more information a little later:
Is this slide to imply that the version without HANA (or HANA XS) for BI Platform will only really just serve as a user rights management and Lumira document repository? And that if I want to view a Lumira document, I must still open from the Lumira Desktop client?
It was suggested I start a new discussion thread to ask this licensing question about a product that's not out yet (but the slide says it's GA so I'm still confused) so here I am with my discussion thread!
Hopefully someone can make me less confused. I'm hoping the answer is as a BI-Suite customer that we do not have to make a decision to either invest in new Edge/Team licenses or buy HANA XS hardware to establish a beachhead of Lumira usage in our organization. We've been struggling with promoting Lumira and the sharing piece has been the sore spot.

Hi Michael
You are right, it is confusing...
I think it will be better to contact sales to get this explained as opposed to technical support people that monitor this SCN Space.
Sales ph: 866-681-3435, 1-800-677-7271
Worldwide Office Locations | SAP
- Ludek
Senior Support Engineer AGS Product Support, Global Support Center Canada
Follow me on Twitter (#SAPLumira)
Got Enhancement ideas? Use the SAP Idea Place

Question for licensing and how to buy in the Philippines.

We are planning to use Kinect for Windows v2 for commercial use in the Philippines.
Do you have any specific license terms for the Philippines?
May I ask distributors in the Philippines?
We would like to contact directly with a distributor here.
Thank you and regards,
Wat

The official locations the Sensor and adapter are available are on the main website:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/kinectforwindows/purchase/default.aspx#tab=2
If your country is not listed, it isn't available.
Carmine Sirignano - MSFT

Please answer a programming question for an admin

I'm not a programmer (although my interest is growing), so I can't answer this question in a discussion regarding how Win32API w/OLE and COM is SO much better than programming for Unix/OS X applications.
The original discussion was in regards to OS X's superior Unix based security, he devolved to this. Having only begun my venture into programming, his questions are a little above my head at this point. I'm also interested (as an amature programmer), how this would be accomplished in OS X/Unix.
Thanks in advance.
Here's his position:
*(1st entry)*
I have unsed Windows and many flavors of Unix and I have written programs in Assembler, Fortran, Pascal, Cobol, RPG, Smalltak, Basic, PowerBuilder, Delphi, C, C++, C#, Java, and Perl, and I have been programming for over 20 years, so I do have extensive knowledge about programming.
So I have one question for you:
If you had to build a business application that has to allow users to, spell and grammer check, and perform financial calculations, and render the HTML, how would you compare the effort to do this in Windows versus that in Linux, AIX, Solaris or any other Unix operating system?
I can make this business application have these features in ONE DAY on Windows, because COM and OLE lets me, use Word to spell and grammer check, Excel to do the financial calculations, and IE to render the HTML!
I make my living building complex customized business software, and Windows allow me to build these applications by myself in weeks, when it would take me and a team of programmers months to do these same things in Unix because of the lack of an the Win32 API, COM, and OLE, or I would have to BUY third party libraries that did these things, and deal with the licensing, versioning, and vendor problems that go with them, and none of those third party librabries would be close to Word, Excel, and IE in CAPABILITY!
HONESTLY tell me and others reading this thread how you would go about create the customized business application I described above by yourself in a Unix instead of Windows, and tell us how many MONTHS or YEARS it would take you, or how you would have to BUY some other third party libraries to do what Word, Excel, and IE!
Anyone who thinks a Unix has more CAPABILITIES than Windows, has never used Win32API/COM/OLE/.Net, and does not build customized complex business software for a living, because we people that do are the reason that you find some much customized business desktop software for Windows, and so little for any Unix.
I have nothing against Unix, and it is great for simple business tasked server software, but for complex business tasked desktop software Windows with Win32API/COM/OLE/.Net wins hands down!
*(2nd Entry)*
A System administrators view of an operating system and an application developers view are entirely different, and the Win32API/COM/OLE/.NET simply make my job so much easier, and you simply don't understand because you do not have to deal with the "dirty' details of making what a user wants, which is why your definition of "integration" and mines are totally different!
With the spell check you talked about, how will you keep in in synch with the dictionary in Word where the user is constantly adding and removing words?
No, you would have the user to have to maintain two different spell check dictionaries, and you would totally ignore the grammer check requirement!
Cutting and pasting data between applications is simple integration, and not the complex type that I am talking about.
Can you make your application display and use the MacGourmet menus appear in its own window, and to access and use the MacGourmet functionality (ie. search for a recipe) in its own window?
Give me one example of a Unix application that can display the menus of another application, yet alone control its features!
Of course you can't, because you need COM and OLE!
I am quite familiar with different flavors of Unix, but those operating systems do not have the rich API and program integration features namely COM and OLE that Windows has, because it violates the Unix idea of security by process isolation!
Yes that idea of process isolation keeps the operating system safe from malicious code in applications and from one application taking the others down, but you lose the power of programs working together, and you simply cannot build the type of customized business applications that I build by myself, without reinventing the wheel over and over and without having a large team with lots of programmers.
For example, my customers and millions of others spend all day working in Word and Excel, and the Windows idea that I can transparently integrate my complex business applications right in Word and Excel menu, and into their templates and macros, is why third party developers like me prefer Windows over Unix, regardless of how much better security in Unix is.
Do not get me wrong, Java improves business application development on Unix, but unfortuantely it is not feasable to rewrite ever legacy application in Java, and Java does not integrate well with other programming languages.
I used to code business application for both IBM MVS and Sun Solaris, and I never want to go back to those "bad" old days again, once I took the time to learn how to PROPERLY code using Win32API/COM/OLE/.NET!

At risk of feeding the troll I'll wander in here:
NOTE: Since this is an Apple programming boards and I have limited experience programming on traditional Unix systems (and most of that in college) I will confine my answers to the area I know.
If you had to build a business application that has to allow users to, spell and grammer check, and perform financial calculations, and render the HTML, how would you compare the effort to do this in Windows versus that in Linux, AIX, Solaris or any other Unix operating system?
I can make this business application have these features in ONE DAY on Windows, because COM and OLE lets me, use Word to spell and grammer check, Excel to do the financial calculations, and IE to render the HTML!
Note that this scenario assumes the user has Microsoft office installed. The person argues that they don't have to purchase libraries to program but what they are effectively doing is simply transferring that cost to user. I don't have to purchase libraries but everyone of my users needs to. Good for you, very good for Microsoft but bad for your customer - IMHO. OK, I know "But all Windows business users have Office installed already." When it comes free with the system then I'll retract my objection.
Under OS X and Cocoa many of these functions are intrinsic to the system layer and do not require any applications to be installed. Using Cocoa you can write a simple Word processor that has rulers, full font manipulation (including kerning, spacing and leading), Document Save and Load, Printing, Export to PDF as well as spell-checking in under 10 lines of actual code. Adding a custom file type and icon for full system integration will add another 5 minutes to your programing.
In case you think I'm blowing smoke here is a tutorial from 2002 (yes, this has been possible for over 5 years) outlining the 8 line Word Processor build in Cocoa. http://www.stone.com/TheCocoa_Files/What_s_sofunny.html
And yes, Cocoa also includes Webkit so I can add full HTML rendering by dragging in a WebKit window to my user interface. For an experienced Cocoa programmer this certainly sounds like less than a day of programming - in fact it sounds like a good tutorial for a middle-experienced training day or 2 day class in Cocoa.
I won't include the link to the 1 line web browser you can build in Cocoa using Webkit because it's shorter than the description. Feel free to search for it if you want to.
HONESTLY tell me and others reading this thread how you would go about create the customized business application I described above by yourself in a Unix instead of Windows, and tell us how many MONTHS or YEARS it would take you, or how you would have to BUY some other third party libraries to do what Word, Excel, and IE!
BUT this is all done from the stock system that is on every OS X computer not simply those with Office installed. Obviously you'd need to add some features that were more complicated than this - because any halfway decent programmer could turn this stuff out - and polish takes a while but to meet the requirements of the challenge it would take 2 days tops.
Is every *nix programming environment like this? I don't know I can only answer for the system that I have experience with and is the concern of this board. If you really have questions regarding *nix programming then I suggest you find an appropriate board and troll^H^H^H^H^H ask there.
If you're ever serious about programming on the Mac feel free to stop by and actually take a look at it. I think you'll be surprised.
=Tod

Report Builder 3.0 Licensing Questions

I have several questions/clarifications on the licensing and use of Report Builder. Any help you could provide, or other resources I should contact would be much appreciated.
I've looked through the license that is included when installing "SQL Server Report Builder 3 for SQL Server 2014", but need to make sure what we want to do is kosher.
Scenario:
A third party software vendor wants to allow users to create and edit .RDL files within Report Builder. The RDL files will then be saved locally to the users desktop, then uploaded into the third party software product(.NET based, and hosted within the organization's
environment). The data for the report will be generated based on the settings of the RDL file, then the data and RDL file will be passed to the "Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms.dll", and a PDF/Excel document will be generated. The user will have
the control to deliver this file anywhere (network share/email/FTP).
The users using the Report Builder, may be employees of either small/medium size businesses, or as large as Fortune 500 businesses. The Organization employing the users, may or may not have a license of SQL Server.
Questions:
1) Does the Organization that owns the third party software, need to own a license of SQL Server? From the License, it appears yes: "If you are licensed to use any one of the following editions of Microsoft SQL Server 2014 software .... you may use this
supplement"
2) Following from #1, if the Organization does not have a license, if they were to purchase a SQL Server license, how many users would a license cover?
What if they purchase a Standard license?
What if they purchase a "Deverloper" License?
I assume the Developer License is for one person, so would only one user be able to use the Report Builder, based on this clause: "You may use this supplement with each validly licensed copy of the software."
2) In the license, it says "You may not: use the supplement for commercial software hosting services.". What does that mean? You can't use it commercially? Or with 'hosting services'? What are 'hosting services'?
3) Can the third party vendor distribute the .MSI file with their software product? Or do the end users need to download it separately, directly from Microsoft?
4) Any restrictions on where the resulting output (PDF/Excel) may be delivered?
5) Are there any restrictions at all on using the "Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms.dll", with an RDL file? Restrictions on how much is processed, where the content goes, etc.?
I think that's about it... Thanks

Please try to use:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=29072 <Microsoft® SQL Server® 2012 Report Builder>.
Chaitanya( Twitter |
Blogs )
Any documentation bug? Tell us about it at
Connect. Please feel free to add any community comments in any of the MSDN/technet articles.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

License question for Flexbuilder 3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for