Licensing and quad core CPU`s

Hi I hope someone can help me here.
We have CF8 enterprise edition installed on a 32 bit OS with 2 dual core CPU`s.
What I want to know is, can I use the same license to migrate CF8 to a new server that has a 64 bit OS with 2 quad core CPU`s.
Also are there any other issues to take into account?.
Any thoughts from anyone who has experience with this kind of thing would be appreciated. Thank you :-)
P.S I tried asking Adobe customer support but it was a waste of time, they couldnt understand the question. My question does make sense right?

Seconded. Once of the nice things about their licensing is that it actually specified "physical" cpus rather than just cores, as Microsoft stuff often does.
Twin octo-core CPUs for the win!

Similar Messages

HT3209 i have a quad core CPU and Radeon HD 6850 Graphics and 8GB of RAM .. and i can't rent HD 1080p Videos ! why ?

i have a quad core CPU and Radeon HD 6850 Graphics and 8GB of RAM .. and i can't rent HD 1080p Videos ! why ?

Welcome to the Apple Community.
Probably because your set up doesn't support HDCP.

Micorsoft Server Compatibility with Laptop system having Intel Pentium Quad-Core CPU N3530 (2.16 GHz)

I would like to know if I can install Microsoft Server 2008 Enterprise or Standard Edition on a Laptop having Intel Pentium Quad-Core CPU N3530 (2.16 GHz). Currently it has Window 8. I do not need Windows 8 and would like to install Microsoft Server 2008
Enterprise or Standard Edition.
Will it work ?
Thnx.

Hi Zahid-I,
We support the Windows server system install on the certified hardware you can search ask your hardware vendor for exactly supported system or you can search the Windows Server
Catalog to found whether your hardware certified by server 2008, personal experience is most of the laptop not supported the server system.
Windows Server Catalog
http://www.windowsservercatalog.com/results.aspx?bCatId=1283&avc=10
Personal experience is if our PC hardware meet the minimum require of server system we can install it for test lab.
More information:
Windows Server 2008 System Requirements
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsserver/bb414778.aspx
I’m glad to be of help to you!
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Quad-core CPU?

Hi All,
We are looking to upgrade of database machine for OCS 10g. If we purchase a machine with a quad-core cpu, will the database be able to take advantage of it? Or are we better of with multiple dual-core processors? Or one dual-core processor? Has anyone upgraded recently? Or have any insights?
Thoughts would be greatly appreciated...
--Bill

All X series ThinkPads, tablet or not, have the CPU soldered onto the board, and not socketed. This has been the case from the days of X20, almost 15 years ago.
So no, you can't swap the CPU unless you are in possession of proper re-balling equipment along with the skills to use it.
Furthermore, a BIOS support for a quad-core CPU would have to exist, which I doubt is presently the case on X series.
Cheers,
George
In daily use: R60F, R500F, T61, T410
Collecting dust: T60
Enjoying retirement: A31p, T42p,
Non-ThinkPads: Panasonic CF-31 & CF-52, HP 8760W
Starting Thursday, 08/14/2014 I'll be away from the forums until further notice. Please do NOT send private messages since I won't be able to read them. Thank you.

Quad core CPU in x230T?

I realize that even if it were possible, cooling would be the primary issue. But I am curious if, say, an i7-3612QM might work in the socket on the mobo. It is rated at 35W, just like the i5-3320m currently installed in mine. Via Intel's ARK, they should both work in the 988 socket on the x230T's mobo.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

All X series ThinkPads, tablet or not, have the CPU soldered onto the board, and not socketed. This has been the case from the days of X20, almost 15 years ago.
So no, you can't swap the CPU unless you are in possession of proper re-balling equipment along with the skills to use it.
Furthermore, a BIOS support for a quad-core CPU would have to exist, which I doubt is presently the case on X series.
Cheers,
George
In daily use: R60F, R500F, T61, T410
Collecting dust: T60
Enjoying retirement: A31p, T42p,
Non-ThinkPads: Panasonic CF-31 & CF-52, HP 8760W
Starting Thursday, 08/14/2014 I'll be away from the forums until further notice. Please do NOT send private messages since I won't be able to read them. Thank you.

New Quad Core CPU

As you all know Intel will be introducing the new quad core CPU soon. Is Apple going to introduce several totally new design desktops equipped with quad core CPUs? Or is Apple only going to offer an optional upgrade to quad core CPUs for their current three Mac Pros?

At first.
I think technology hit a wall... a heat dissipation wall.
The plan seems to be to reduce the speed and power and
compensate by brodening the force-area. This reduces
escaping power and produces more efficiency per power
unit. This is just simple coefficients.
Like if I had 8 procs each running at 1GHtz it's going to
aproach the speed of a single 7 or 8GHtz unit but at a
fraction of the power consumption and a magnitude of the
efficiency. This shift started five or six years ago.
http://tweakers.net/ext/i.dsp/1066381706.jpg <- 5 years ago
Maybe more. 64way units are already here. Though I bet we
don't see them on desktops for a good while. When this
reaches it's limits who knows what's up next? Chemical or
Atomic Phase processors? Shrug. World War Three not
withstanding..

P6N and Quad-Core

Hey Guys,
I´ve got a P6N Mainboard with the Nvidia reference design 680i and C00 revision.In the moment there are no problems, cause there is a C2D E6600 working on it, but i will buy a quad-core cpu soon and I ve often heard about problems with quad-core cpus and the C00 revision. but i only heard about problems with the evga 680i board and not with the p6n. so, has anybody problems with a quad core and the p6n or does anybody know if there are problems with a Quad-Core CPU and the C00 revision? I think the evga 680i and the p6n are nearly the same, aren`t they? They are both the nvidia reference design.
Evga is changing the C00 revision into a D00 revision 4free, does msi also do that?
And is it right, that the p6n isn`t sold any more?
so far
LostDevil

Quote from: AaronYuri on 18-November-07, 04:00:12
You can put an eVGA BIOS on the P6N anyway. They are all manufactured and distrobuted by Foxconn
Yes, but that is not the matter. I wonder if there are problems with the C00 revision of this board. As far as I know you can`t solve these Quad-Core incompatibility with a bios update. You need a new board with a D00 revision to run a Quad Core CPU or can I run a quad core only with a Bios update on a C00 rev?

Seconds() function issue on Quad Core CPU

Hello,
I am noticing some timing issues using Seconds() function on a Quad Core computer. The optional boolean in Seconds() is True (by default).
With Core 2 Duo CPUs, the seconds() function is reporting elapsed time (since TestStand startup) correctly. However, I noticed on a Quad Core CPU that the seconds(True) function reports ~0.5s every 1 second. In other words, seconds() elapsed is incorrectly reported. Has anyone observed such issue?
When the boolean parameter is set to False [i.e. Seconds(False)], there is no problem observed on Quad Core CPU.

Howdy Troy,
I don't have a quad core to duplicate your issue, but it sounds plausible. Since this is an older version of TestStand that was developed before multicores went mainstream, this very well may be expected behavior.
You might instead call directly into the Windows API using kernel32.dll--particularly one of these functions:
GetSystemTime
GetSystemTimes (for multicore)
GetTickCount
External Link: MSDN: Time Functions (Windows)
Judging from the nature of your question, I think GetTickCount would suit you best.
I hope this helps!
Warm regards,
pBerg

Jvm on quad-core cpu

does anyone know some good literature
about how the jvm can utilize
the parellism power of a quad-core cpu?
even without spawning a java thread, or otherwise
trying for parallelism, the jvm will run faster because....?
its up to xp pro to utilize the 4 cores, right?
the jvm can't "known" about the 4 cores?
please give me some links to good
documentation
thanks.

does anyone know some good literature
about how the jvm can utilize
the parellism power of a quad-core cpu?
even without spawning a java thread, or otherwise
trying for parallelism, the jvm will run faster
because....?
its up to xp pro to utilize the 4 cores, right?
the jvm can't "known" about the 4 cores?Sure it can:
System.out.println("Core count: " + Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors());This code returns '4' for my twin dual-core machine.
Some of the classes in java.util.concurrent make use of this method.
Jim S.

Is there a quad core cpu for my macbook 13in pro early 2011 with the socket P8400

Is there a quad core cpu for my macbook 13in pro early 2011 with the socket P8400?
The duel core is not doing the work i need done....

You cannot upgrade the CPU on a notebook. They are integrated onto the motherboard. Sell the one you have then purchase a new one with the quad-core CPU.

Quad core and Four core cpu's

Hi guys,
i have a silly question my macbook pro of late 2011 has Intel i7 cpu runs at 2.2 GHz and has four cores ,now my question
is Quad core and Four cores is one and the same.
Please donot lough my question.
prabh s

Thank you very much.
prabhi s

T530, HD 4000 and Quad Core: Not Possible?

Hello,
I'm in the market for a new Thinkpad and it seems on the T530, if you go for a quad core (QM CPUs), you're forced to go with nvidia.
Is is set in stone? I ask because I couldn't care less about the nvidia gpu on Linux...
If it is, can the GPU be completely disabled in the BIOS?

JDay wrote:
You get the Nvidia GPU and the HD 4000 (HD 4000 is built into the CPU). It is actually a nice feature to have, especially if you want to use more than 2 monitors at a time. If you only want to use the HD 4000 just select Integrated Graphics in the UEFI firmware (BIOS). I don't think you can upgrade to the quad-core yourself since I am pretty sure you need a different heatsink/fan assembly to prevent overheating. In fact the motherboard may be different as well, which would explain why it is only available with the Nvidia GPU.
The HD4000 should be able to handle enough monitors I can think of. That said you have a good point about the heatsink/fan assembly. Looking at the HW Maintenance Manual, it's definitely not the same piece.
Page 92 of T530 Maintenance Manual.
Bottom line is I guess I'll fork the extra money, even if the GPU isn't really of any use.
Thanks folks.

What kind of performance difference would cuda and quad core make in Premiere?

I am torn between spending $1.5k and $2k on a new macbook because the 15inch one has a 650m and i7 but is more expencive. I currently run a beastly system and want something for a mobile rig for more casual projects. How much of a performance boost would I actually get with cuda and a quad core vs dual core i5?

Lots of discussions like this in the hardware sub-forum http://forums.adobe.com/community/premiere/hardware_forum?view=discussions
Many good links, with some performance charts, at http://ppbm7.com/index.php/tweakers-page
Bottom line... fast CPU and Cuda DO make a difference, along with 2 or more hard drives (or SSD + 7200RPM hard drive) especially for HiDef editing

Trying to decide between i7 and quad core - was told that i7 will overheat?

Hi,
Did some searching in old threads on this here and online - seemed inconclusive so thought I'd ask again since the Core i7s have been out a while now.
I've been trying to decide between buying a quad core and one of the recent MPB 15" i7s (specifically the 2.66 with the hi res non glare screen). I use FCP, DVDSP, Photoshop etc - usually for several hours a day.
Although the quad core seems the logical choice, I'm on a budget would like some wiggle room to get some other gear - if I get the MPB, I'd be able to sell my 13" 2.53 Core 2 Duo and get that gear. On the other hand, I'm trying to think long term in terms of the viability of the machine I buy.
Just got off the phone with MacMall who told me that because the quad core uses physical cores and the MPB Core i7 uses virtual cores there is a substantial overheating issue with the MPB if you're doing sustained work - say working in Photoshop all day, as I often do. He said that the MBP Core i7s weren't designed to do that so the overheating could cause logic board and other issues over time.
Has anyone experienced this?? Or if you have other thoughts on my dilemma, would love to hear them.
Thanks!
cb

I will be a bit more blunt than the other person. Whomever you talked to at MacMall was full of it.
Either you transcribed the details of the conversation wrong, or they have no clue what they're talking about.
Even if you're doing a lot of work in Photoshop all day, the odds of you doing anything that requires a lot of sustained heavy action by the CPU is going to be low. There might be 5 minutes worth of something here or there, but most of the time it's probably going to be pretty limited CPU wise.
There's a reason Apple doesn't put the Core i5 or i7 into the 13" MBPs, and that's because there's just not enough room in the case for the second fan the 15 and 17" models have.
But long story short, Apple isn't like HP or Acer, who will stuff desktop CPUs into laptops because there's some idiot out there who will buy it. And it would be pretty stupid to put a high end CPU like the Core i7 into a laptop, and then expect people NOT to use it.
MBPs aren't really designed for hours worth of sustained work like you'd get from gaming, but I don't think you'd run into any problems with Photoshop.

Can DIAdem 2012 use multiple processors on Quad Core CPU?

Hi,
I am running scripts in DIAdem 2012 which take upwards of 10 minutes to complete. However, I notice my CPU usage never goes above 15% during this time. My understanding is that that generally suggests the software is not 64-bit compatible and therefore not taking advantage of the other cores (I'm on a quad-core i7). I also have 12gb ram and that is not being heavily taxed by DIAdem either.
Anybody know how I can squeeze some extra juice out of my computer to help DIAdem run faster? Thanks!

Hello Mark,
Multi-core support only makes sense for very few operations in DIAdem (i.e. Large amounts of data being sent through an FFT routine) and is currently not supported. Also, 64-bit only makes a difference when working with very large data files.
That said, there are ways to improve processing speed in DIAdem without using extra cores or 64-bit versions of software. My best suggestion is to get in touch with our senior Product Support Engineer (Dr. Brad Turpin) and combing through your Script(s) to see where there is potential to improve processing speeds by optimizing the Script(s). I'm not implying that your Script(s) are badly written, I just know from experience that changing a few things in the Script(s) has lead to reduced processing times by using optimized functions in DIAdem that you might not be aware of.
Dr. Turpin can be reached at this email address: brad DOT turpin @ ni DOT com
Please reference this forum thread when you contact him.
Best regards,
Otmar
Otmar D. Foehner
Business Development Manager
DIAdem and Test Data Management
National Instruments
Austin, TX - USA
"For an optimist the glass is half full, for a pessimist it's half empty, and for an engineer is twice bigger than necessary."

Licensing and quad core CPU`s

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for