Lightroom 1.1 grinding to a halt

I have Lightroom 1.1 running on a Dell Core 2(Windows XP) 4 gig of RAM and never had any problems until recenty. I haven't changed anything that I can think of, but the program is taking forever to respond. Also, if I just keep it open in the background while I attend to other work, I have noticed that it consumes 50% of the CPU while simply sitting idle. It's almost appears as if it is trying to index my hard drive or something.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Similar Messages

I have the top of the range MacBook Pro. Yet every time I open iPhoto it grinds to a halt with iPhoto crashing 1 out of every 4 times I open it. Is this normal? And if not how can I fix it?

I have the top of the range MacBook Pro (but not the latest one with the Retina display). Yet every time I open iPhoto it grinds to a halt with iPhoto crashing 1 out of every 4 times I open it. Is this normal? And if not how can I fix it? I have 55k photo's.

No it's not normal. What version of iPhoto? Post the first 50 lines only of the crash report
Regards
TD

Mail in Mountain Lion Grinds to a Halt

All of sudden, my mail downloads grind to a halt. I am using OS 10.8.3 and have a 60 MB/sec connection to my ISP. When I start a download, the pace shows in excess of 2 MB/sec and then rapidly slows to about 1 kb, and then slows to zero. The only way to get emails is to do a force quit on Mail and restart it. I can bet a few emails in before it slows and stops again. I have tried rerieving mail with Thunderbird which rips through my downloads superfast. I would prefer to continue to use Mail th

First, if you want to clean your Mac, cleanse it of "CleanMyMac."
Triple-click the line below to select it:
~/Library/Mail
Right-click or control-click the highlighted line and select
Services ▹ Show Info
from the contextual menu. An Info dialog should open. What is the Size shown?

Repairing permissions takes ages! and other apps grind to a halt.

Hi,
I tried repairing disk permissions today after noticing a bit of a general slow-down and the progress bar went about 5mm across and stopped. The animation kept going making it look like it was revolving but it didn't progress along.
I have tried quitting all apps, logging out, trying again, trying in a test account and nothing changes the fact that it takes 5 minutes approx to complete the job.
If I click on any other object whilst its determining and repairing, everything grinds to a halt: the dock freezes, action buttons go blue and stay blue, the rainbow ball spins. I've run activity monitor and it shows approx 1.6% CPU usage and the temp stays around 49 degrees C.
I recently installed Photoshop Elements but it wasn't running at the time and once permissions were sucessfully repaired it still displayed all the symptoms described above.
Anyone have a clue what's happening?
Any light shed gratefully received.

Here goes,
Ran permissions repair from DVD and it did the same thing so I clicked stop repair, the button went blue and nothing else happened for 10 minutes. I forced a shutdown and started again.
This time I went straight for repair disk and it said...
Verify and repair disk "Macintosh HD"
Checking HFS Plus Volume
Checking events overflow file
Checking catalogue file
(Red Text)-> Invalid node structure
Volume check failed
Error: the underlying task reported failure on exit
(Black txt)-> HFS Volume checked
(Red text)-> 1 Volume could not be repaired because of an error.
So, I have backed up this HD but will my clone be duff as well now or is this a physical corruption to the actual structure of the disk? I guess I can check using DUtility on my external HD.
I guess I'd better call apple eh!
Thanks, Ben.
PS - any other suggestions??

Air and mac operating system grinding to a halt

I'm running air applications on Mac Mini computers (predominantly running 10.7.2) and am finding that after a few weeks of running constantly the air app gradually slows down, then grinds to a halt. The applications are dynamic animations that run full screen 1080p - they are artworks that are left on constantly.
It then becomes impossible (or very slow) to quit the air app and the whole computer will respond very slowly or not at all. After this has happened a few times the computer will not even restart and will need the system re-installing.
I've tried running various statistics outputting things, like MR Doobs Hi-Res-Stats - so I can monitor the framerate, memory and children. There are no obvious problems there. The cause of the issue is very hard to debug as it initially takes weeks for this error to occur, though after that it re-occurs more frequently and seems to affect the Mac OS too.
The Mac mini is a 2.5GHz Intel Core i5 with AMDRadeon HD 6630M 256MB graphics. This model does not have automatic graphics switching which i've seen can cause problems.
I am currently upgrading the os and seeing if that will help, but it will probably take weeks of constant running to see a repeat in the issue.

Ive run a test version and checked the memory usage using some open source monitors like the one described above (high res stats). Im no expert with trying to test for memory leaks, but this does give feedback to direct, max direct, total and garbage. After running this air app for a few days the memory remains stable. On my test screen the direct and max direct are around 30 and 45 (i assume its MB).
Theres an image attached with these monitors - this picture is taken with me testing the movie in the flash ide so i believe thats making these values much higher, however they also are remaining stable.
I think the version of air used initially was 2.5 (this is the one thats misbehaving), i've since loaded version 3.1 into my copy of flash CS5.5, i need to run a long test with this version too. The trouble is that problems seem to take weeks to appear. I will be setting up the final version of this mac mini setup to restart automatically every night.
I'm currently testing a version of this film as a flash projector rather than air to see what that does. Please let me know what other tests i can run. I can post the code i'm using - its not that big (200 or so lines)
To explain a bit more about what i'm doing - I work for an artist who makes dynamic (randomised) animations which play on HD screens using Macs and PCs. These will generally be left on all day, some are never turned off, some are. I've seen a few different films recently freeze (fine when its quit and restarted) or in this case slow down to almost 1 frame every 30 seconds and completely break the computer, in some cases requiring the system to be re-installed (the film i'm talking about falls into the latter situation).

Lion grinds to a halt when a network volume is mounted

Ok, so I've got a network drive that I mount infrequently, but when i do the OS grinds to a halt. I don't think it's Spotlight because it doesn't tell me it's indexing the drive in the Spotlight tab. I've tried adding it to the privacy tab in Preferences too but that makes no difference. iStat Menus sometimes shows big spikes of CPU usage across all cores at the time, yet oddly at others it doesn't. The network section of iStat also shows wildly varying network traffic whilst it's happening too, sometimes upto 3MB/s, but this fluctuates all over the place.
What can I use to try and track down what's happening? It's a fairly easy bug to reproduce, but the system is pretty unusable while it's actually happening; can take 10-15 seconds to respond to a click because of the inevitable beachball of doom. Any suggestions?
Just in case it helps, it's a Samba share from a ZFS filesystem.

I use an ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro with dual monitors and its certainly not a top of the range card nor as SteveG suggests should it be.
> Maybe it's just me, but could you please explain how a faster drive makes a difference to the performance when zoomed in? Because on the face of it, that makes no sense.
It could have something to do with the alignment of the planets rather than the faster hard drive but all I can do is give the facts, my observations and logical conclusions :-)
Zoom in for really close work with large track count recorded at 44.1k with a 7200 rpm drive and I would have an annoying lag of about 2ish seconds enough to really disrupt workflow.
Do nothing else but add a 10k rpm drive and make that my primary work drive - problem gone.
Think about the logic of it for a minute.
You are somewhere say in the middle of the song you zoom in (I'm thinking just now while I'm typing - which is novel in itself - that Steve you may be thinking that the lag is in the zoom - its not and that could be the confusion but I'll continue) and press play. AA has to load the tracks position the file pointers of all track at the beginning of the file then move each pointer to the position in the song for each track to your zoom point and then play the tracks.
Worse for 48k files and probably worse (can't tell cause I usually have heaps of edits) with heaps of slices as each is a virtual copy of the original track.
That's a lot of work and a lot of data to move around - I'm seriosly looking at the solid state drives with lower seek times.
BlairT you have some serious PC issues cause that machine should be coping without a problem.

Premier stutters, stop, starts, becomes unresponsive, and grinds to a halt

ok, i3770 3.5
24 gig ram 1333 ( 23.2 usable)
win 7 64x ultimate
Wacom touch pen interface
2x Ati Radeon 6870 1gb gddr5 ( usually un-crossfired)
premier pro 5.5.2
now, I more than meet the minimum needs for adobe premier, but sometimes, when I am using it, it grinds to a near halt and "becomes unresponsive" between simple actions. I checked online and it said to shut off the gpu setting, which I could not find on my version of adobe premier CS5.5. So, I figure my scratch disk drive is too full. so I free up 50 gig or so by uninstalling some games im not playing. I run my registry cleaner, and I still have the same problem.
Is it because I de-frag my HDD once a week ? did some of the files get shifted and this is causing major problems in performance ?
Im not sure if this is a hardware or a configuration problem.
What I am doing is creating my own cartoon in it. which I am sure , is not what this program is designed for, but I find it much more intuitive to use than flash for some reason. its a comfort / time issue for me.
http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n247/Godamuss/detail...
this picture shows on the left what the key frames look like over view, and the right side has them under closer scrutiny, you can see how the small files for the lip syncing, are .... "zerg-like". the red line is in the same place, for reference.
Am I trying to make my pc do too much ? have I gone beyond consumer grade ability ?
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqQI1x9bna9xWszc8eO_L_...
last cartoon link : for reference. low production values, but hey, its a 2 man show with 1 man doing all the computer work.
any help would be greatly appreciated. thank you.

Hello again, I can see that your Mac is running last year's 2011 generation Macbook Air, am I correct? If older, then I suppose that it is because likely of the new operating system, with new software added in, I think it is stressing the RAM a lot. Also, likely is because your using a lot of your hard drive's storage. Other than that, you can go and configure your mac or get a new one. These are suggestions I could offer, on the other hand I think you will have to stop updating your operating system. Not software updates, but operating system. Means you maybe sticking to Mountain Lion for "a while". Sorry I couldn't be much of a help. But yes, those are old specs and you may be stressing your computer hardware.
Another option is to get expensive accessories like an external hard drive and buying more RAM. Your graphics card should be fine since your using an Air likely just for work and internet browsing.

PC non-responsive during sync to apple TV (grinds to a halt)

Unlike a lot of people in this forun, I am happy with my apple tv sync performance.
However, while the sync process is happening, the windows GUI and the other programs grind to a near-halt for 10 minutes or so. All the windows programs just about unresponsive.
I would be a lot happier if Apple could make the sync process slower (it could run over a few hours, for all I care), if it would leave my PC in a useable condition. This slow down happens even if I am just adding a few podcasts to the apple tv.
I have an airport extreme, and the larger Apple Tv model, which is almost full.
Streaming mode is not an option for me, as I dont want to have the PC on at all times.
Is there an option I am missing that can make this sync operation run at a lower priority?? The network performance in the task manager indicates a very low level of network activity, with a high level of CPU utilication.
Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks!!!
Thanks,
Wayne

Welcome to the  Discussion Forums.
You don't say anything about your pc, could it simply be underpowered in terms of CPU and RAM, I only sync my photos but when I do, I generally sync to several tv's at once and don't seem to suffer any slowdown.

Audition grinds to a halt when I zoom in on a complex multitrack session.

Howdy.
I'm putting Audition up against a pretty powerful computer:
- 4 GB RAM
- Quad core at 2.4 Ghz per core
- All SATA hard drives
- nVidia 8800 video card
That said, when I get into a complex multi-track session (more than about 10 tracks with effects) and start zooming in tight, the program grinds to a total halt. The CPU usage on all four cores spikes to 100%, but the audio rarely drops out.
For example, in a recent remix with 30 tracks (and minimal effects), I had zoomed in to just a single measure, and it was taking Audition about 5 to 7 seconds just to respond to clicks and keyboard strokes. Once I zoom out, the problem magically resolves.
And you know...I seem to remember this happening back in Audition 1.5 as well.
Is this just me? I can definitely reproduce it on two entirely different (and powerful) computers. Anyone else had this problem and/or know how to fix it?

I use an ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro with dual monitors and its certainly not a top of the range card nor as SteveG suggests should it be.
> Maybe it's just me, but could you please explain how a faster drive makes a difference to the performance when zoomed in? Because on the face of it, that makes no sense.
It could have something to do with the alignment of the planets rather than the faster hard drive but all I can do is give the facts, my observations and logical conclusions :-)
Zoom in for really close work with large track count recorded at 44.1k with a 7200 rpm drive and I would have an annoying lag of about 2ish seconds enough to really disrupt workflow.
Do nothing else but add a 10k rpm drive and make that my primary work drive - problem gone.
Think about the logic of it for a minute.
You are somewhere say in the middle of the song you zoom in (I'm thinking just now while I'm typing - which is novel in itself - that Steve you may be thinking that the lag is in the zoom - its not and that could be the confusion but I'll continue) and press play. AA has to load the tracks position the file pointers of all track at the beginning of the file then move each pointer to the position in the song for each track to your zoom point and then play the tracks.
Worse for 48k files and probably worse (can't tell cause I usually have heaps of edits) with heaps of slices as each is a virtual copy of the original track.
That's a lot of work and a lot of data to move around - I'm seriosly looking at the solid state drives with lower seek times.
BlairT you have some serious PC issues cause that machine should be coping without a problem.

10.6.2 grinds to a halt after a few hours

I've seen a few recent similar threads, but none were exactly the same so I figured I'd start my own. We have recently setup a MacMini Server for local IMAP mail, afp, ftp, and web services, those are the only services it is running. DNS and DHCP are provided via a third party server we do not control, but all lookups appear to be providing the expected information.
The problem has happened to us twice now, both times from a clean install. We would set it up with 3 admin users and a few test accounts and all services worked as expected for days.
The first failed iteration we then used Passenger to add 269 more accounts - those accounts worked as expected for a few days but then the server ground to a halt. We could still ping it, but it stopped responding to IMAP or web requests, and apps running on the server (such as Console, Server Admin, even Activity Monitor) would sporadically show up as "Not Responding" until eventually it was entirely unresponsive (other than you could still successfully ping it) and we had to force a power switch shutdown. After that it repeatably showed the same behavior every 2-4 hours, services work fine at the beginning and then get slower until they become unresponsive.
The second failed iteration we guessed that perhaps the Passenger user import introduced a corruption so we had been manually entering users one at a time. Yesterday we got up to 174 users and it began exhibiting the same behavior. Every 2-4 hours it just dies.
Activity Monitor shows no excessive process behavior, CPU usage, memory usage, or network usage.
Exhaustive Console searching is revealing no seemingly pertinent information other than one message in the system.log which I think is a symptom of the problem rather than the cause:
"dovecot\[59\]: imap-login: Timeout waiting for handshake from auth server."
This message was logged hundreds of times before we eventually force the machine to shut down.
I'm out of ideas at this point...

Jeremy made me aware of this thread. I think I have the same problem (see this for more info: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2299067&tstart=0 ) and am stuck too.
I made a small script which basically watches the thread count of the DirectoryService every 5 seconds and restarts DirectoryService if it reaches a certain treshold. But even with a very low treshold level (I went as low as 18 threads in the end), it wasn't able to 'catch' DirectoryService when it went bezerk.
After that I did enable OD debugging and found a continious stream of -14292 errors (eNotHandledByThisNode) on the fileserver. This seems odd because all the regular logs show nothing special. I combed through Open Directory again and found that the machine records for the 3 servers (1 ODM, 2 ODRs) aren't correct. The hardware addresses of the three servers are mixed up. I can trace this back to when I installed the servers. I had two servers where I could work on at that time and imaged the final setups for three servers. So next thing I'll try is to correct these records and see if it changes things.

Email grinding to a halt on N8 - PLEASE HELP!

Hello All, I hope someone can help. My gmail account on my N8 has all-but ground to a halt. It can at times take hours to get an email to send, and even when it leaves my Outbox it may not reach my Sentbox for another 60-90 minutes or so, and when this happens the recipient may well receive 2 or 3 copies of it, which all (eventually) show in my Sentbox. At the same time, it seems to take hours at times for an incoming message to hit my Inbox. This is hopeless. My provider (o2) has been supportive, and sent new settings, and now a new SIM, and yet nothing has improved. I have deleted large numbers of emails from my files in the hope this will help, but it hasn't. I notice that things are a little better when I am at home using my wireless network than when I am out and about. Even so, I often have to switch my phone on and off to get an email to send, and sent emails are still ridiculously slow to show up in my Sentbox. When email is at its worst the internet is also slow, and yet the rest of my family, also on o2, have no problem. Ideas badly needed! All help welcome..

bump!

Just installed latest Itunes, and system now grinds to a halt, caused by apsdaemon.exe and apple mobile using 99% processing. Have stopped these processes, but each time I start Itunes I have to do it all over again, any help would be appreciated

Having just installed the latest iTunes update, I find my system grinds to a complete standstill. I've checked and found two apple processes, apsdaemon.exe and applemobiledeviceservice.exe use 90% plus of my processor, so have stopped these. However, each time I start iTunes the same situation occurs. Is there anyway I can remove these exes from my system or is apple aware of this stupid update and what are they doing about it. Any guidance would be very much appreciated

What version of itunes were you using before you updates?
Have you checked other related post?
iTtune will require applemobiledeviceservices.exe and others to run. What you are experencing is usually caused by a conflict with other software on you system. Everybodys system is set up differently, so there is not a "one fix all". Most commonly associated with Firefox addons, video accelerator software, podcasts on the backup, anivirus software, parential control software, take you pick!
I found my fix here.
https://support.apple.com/kb/TS4123

Aperture 2 Grinds to a halt

Hi
I was heading for Aperture 2 purchase, but towards the end of the 30 day Trial, it has become unaccepatably slow in every operation. Starting again with a fresh library does not help. Moving one slider provokes the spinning disc, and if the prgramme is processing thunbnails, you really can't do anything at all. This has cost me a lot of time and wrecked a prep for an important presentation today - a disastrous couple of days, after I had put my faith in the software, which was otherwise a pleasure to use. Nothing has changed on the 2gb system, and I run no other programs while Aperture is running. Aperture did this all on its own, 26 days into the trial, on a machine used for nothing else.
Anything Apple can do to stop me heading for Lightroom?
Paul Ingram FRSA

Paul-
Exactly which iMac are you running that only allows 2 GB RAM? Such boxes are typically the earliest of the lower end MacIntels that I would expect not to have the best performance. I did say earlier: If Aperture worked well for 20 days on your system and Aperture is working well for other folks with lesser systems, it would seem that something unique is going on with your setup. But if your iMac is the very earliest, inherent hardware limitations cannot be discounted (except that your box ran AP well for a few weeks, which stumps me).
I fully agree that Apple should be more up front with the real hardware needs of the app. However such has always been the case with heavy graphics apps. E.g. Adobe has always listed hardware requirements that will just barely allow Photoshop to run. It is up to users to figure out that (just like with camera lenses) you get what you pay for as far as graphics performance goes.
Based on decades of experience IMO waiting for hardware requirements to somehow magically reduce is futile; hardware demands do not decrease over time. One either tolerates the weak hardware and takes all possible steps to optimize, or gives up on the app until one owns the next generation of hardware. E.g. my maxxed G3 laptop was too slow for even the simplest Photoshop work, so all PS work had to be done on the G4 tower. When I got the 1.67 GHz G4 Powerbook PS became field-usable for the first time.
I have been using Aperture quite successfully (except for the huge PITA of inadequate internal hard drive capacity) on a Macbook Pro, before that "workable" on a G4 Powerbook presumably weaker than your iMac. At the moment I am repurposing a 2006 Mac Pro for Aperture; RAID0, advanced graphics card and adding 8 GB RAM are part of the repurposing. I learned a long time ago that less than adequate hardware is cost-ineffective for heavy pro graphics work.
-Allen

When we download from iTunes store, our network grinds to a halt and iTunes is downloading at a snails pace.

Not really sure, but when we download content from itunes, our network grinds to a stop and iTunes is the culprit. Funny thing is that iTunes is only using a small percentage of the bandwith. If we quit iTunes, all goes back to normal. But if we leave itunes running, problem persists.
We have 10mb download speed, and 500Mb takes around 4hrs. Any ideas?

how old is your computer, what the ram in it?
if not the internet, it maybe the lion.
i used 2Gb mac on lion, its really slow down since upgrading to lion
i upgraded to 3Gb and things speed up a bit.
itunes still slow because its just has many heavy graphics.
i also cannot use Google Chrome for some reason, slower computer and makes my screen flickers heavily.
once i quit chrome, all works smoother.

OS 10.8.5 on iMac grinding to a halt - fairly usual CPU but up to 7GB Page outs after starting Safari (I think)

Hi
I'm running OS 10.8.5 on an iMac (early 2009, 4GB memory), which has been running fine up until today:
Applications started becoming very unresponsive, and eventually beach balled until it became unusable. Restarts didnt cure it.
Having looked in the Activity Monitor from suggestions in discussions here, the System Memory 'Page Outs' seemed high, at 7GB
For a while, if I didnt run Safari, it seemed to stay at 0
Once I've run Safari, the Page Outs keep climbing, even when Safari is closed
The Page Outs are raising at between 1MB/sec and 7MB/sec, which i think seems high based on reading people's comments
(CPU usage seemed fairly normal, except for an occaisional 'Safari Web Content' jump to 20% once in a while)
Im using Safari 6.0.5, and aside from Java being enabled (I've tried turning it off, same effect), theres nothing unusual about what I'm doing in Safari
Any ideas about what could be causing this / what to do?
Many thanks in advance

There is excessive swapping of data between physical memory and virtual memory. That can happen for two reasons:
You have a long-running process with a memory leak (i.e., a bug), or
You don't have enough memory installed for your usage pattern.
Tracking down a memory leak can be difficult, and it may come down to a process of elimination.
When you notice the swap activity, open the Activity Monitor application and select All Processes from the menu in the toolbar, if not already selected. Click the heading of the Real Mem column in the process table twice to sort the table with the highest value at the top. If you don't see that column, select
View ▹ Columns ▹ Real Memory
from the menu bar.
If one process (excluding "kernel_task") is using much more memory than all the others, that could be an indication of a leak. A better indication would be a process that continually grabs more and more real memory over time without ever releasing it. Here is an example of how it's done.
The process named "Safari Web Content" renders web pages for Safari and other applications. It uses a lot of memory and may leak if certain Safari extensions or third-party web plugins are installed. Consider it a prime suspect.
Another process often implicated in memory leaks is "inkjet8," which is a component of the HP printing softwre. If it's present, force-quit the process in Activity Monitor to solve the problem temporarily. If you don't use an HP printer, remove the software. Otherwise, if the problem is recurrent, update the software (which may not help) or contact HP support.
If you don't have an obvious memory leak, your options are to install more memory (if possible) or to run fewer programs simultaneously.
The next suggestion is only for users familiar with the shell. For a more precise, but potentially misleading, test, run the following command:
sudo leaks -nocontext -nostacks process | grep total
where process is the name of a process you suspect of leaking memory. Almost every process will leak some memory; the question is how much, and especially how much the leak increases with time. I can’t be more specific. See the leaks(1) man page and the Apple developer documentation for details.

Lightroom 1.1 grinding to a halt

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for