Lightroom 4.1RC2 no export color fringe correction to CS5 Camera Raw 6.7RC

The new colorfringe correction method in Lightroom 4.1 RC2 works fine even for difficult longitudinal CA when used with care. After basic adjustments I normally export my raw file to CS5 for further editing.
However found out that even after the Camera Raw update to 6.7 RC my Lightroom colorfringe adjustments were not transfered to CS5.
I sincerely hope this is not true: but do we require to buy CS6 with Camera Raw 7 to open the raw image with Lightroom corrections for colorfringes maintained?
Herb Sennet
The Netherlands

Herb 19 wrote:
However found out that even after the Camera Raw update to 6.7 RC my Lightroom colorfringe adjustments were not transfered to CS5.
Herb Sennet
The Netherlands
I just confirmed for myself that the defringe adjustments do not transfer to Photoshop when you tansfer via an "Edit in Photoshop."
Hopefully this is very temporary (until we get ACR 6.8 for CS5), since I regularly bring raws into PS via the "Edit in" route.  I find this is useful to see if further improvements are possible.  A good percentage of the time the answer is no, in which case  I leave the image as a space-saving 16-bit raw, rather than a  bulky 16-bit tiff. 
As things stand now, I''l have to first render my images as Tiffs in LR, then erase those that don't benefit from PS processing.  Yuck.
That defringe is a really nice tool, though!    
Jerry

Similar Messages

  • Automatic Lens Correction in the Camera Raw Correction Panel not showing

    I have just migrated my CS5 to another computer. However to my surprise II could not see automatic Lens Correction option in my Lens Correction Panel of Camera Raw as in then past. All i got was option for Chromatic Aberration etc.
    How do I get the software to switch to Automatic Lens Correction in the Camera Raw Correction Panel?
    Thanks.

    I hope it's just as simple as this:  Did you click on the little Profile tab?
    -Noel

  • Lightroom 5 not rendering the color red correctly

    Out of the blue, LR5 has decided to render red as a dark orange - similar to the orange in the SF Giants team colors.  But red in the LR5 import previews is correct.  It's also correct in a different editor, Faststone Image Viewer and Irfan View.
    It's orange when opened in Camera RAW 8.1 from PS Elements 10.  So the culprit would seem to be Camera Raw 8.1.
    A picture is worth a thousand words:

    Couldn't you reach 120 Luminance in Eye One Match in advanced mode using the display's Brightness control? Are you using on the 'Custom' display preset mode and adjusting the RGB controls in Eye One Match for 6500K? Try downloading the latest Eye One Match v3.6.2 software, uninstall what you have now and reinstall with the new download v3.6.2. Something's wrong with the calibration process.
    Please provide your display control settings, including Brightness, Contrast, RGB Color, and any other display control settings. Here's what TFT Central used:
    Calibrated Settings
    (Custom mode)
    luminance (cd/m2)
    121
    Black Point (cd/m2)
    0.18
    Contrast Ratio
    672:1
    Firstly I calibrated the screen using LaCie's software suite while also changing the monitor to the 'Custom' preset mode, affording me access to the RGB colour controls. During the calibration process the screens brightness was adjusted to 20%, with contrast being left at 50%. RGB values were altered to 92, 90 and 98 respectively. It should be noted that OSD adjustments only form part of the calibration process with the majority of changes being made automatically at the graphics card LUT level.
    After calibration, the results of the test and report were far more pleasing! Luminance was corrected nicely to 121 cd/m2, with black depth being improved also to 0.18 cd/m2. This gave us a static contrast ratio of 672:1 which was adequate. The gamma was now corrected to 2.2, and colour temperature was also now recorded at 6477k (<1% out). Most impressively the colour accuracy was improved drastically, with dE average being only 0.5, and maximum being only 1.0. LaCie would consider colour accuracy to be excellent here, and this was certainly a very pleasing improvement to the default factory settings.

  • Where is Fringe Color Selector Tool in CS6/Camera Raw 7.3?

    I have been reading "The Digital Negative" and on page 100 it references the Finge Color Selector tool when talking about the Lens Correction menu's  color tab and how to remove color fringing.  They talk about an eye dropper tool that you select but I don't see it on my color tab.  Where should I be looking for it?  The book indicates it should be on this color tab (I tried the dropper tool found across the top of the image but that was not the right one).  Using PS CS6 with all updates on a Windows 7 64 bit machine.   I will try to insert a screen capture of that tab below.  Thanks in advance for any help.

    Thanks for the reply and help.  What had me confused and thinking I was missing some functionality/a tool was the text on page 99, "You pick up the tool by clicking it."  When I saw your graphic (red "A") showing the graphic of the dropper tool and then next graphic where the tool graphic has disappeared (red "B") I thought it was indicating I needed to find an actual place/graphic in the panel to click to activate the tool as opposed to the "preview" via the Alt key you later reference on page 100.
    Could you please tell me when the panel like on page 99 (noted as red "C") is supposed to appear?  I also see a similar panel appear on page 101 but have yet to have it display during defringing even after using your guidance to use the Alt button.
    Thanks again!

  • Export to HDR/Panorama asks for Camera RAW 7?

    When exporting multiple images to CS5, get this:-
    No update to 7 apparent.

    In the past, versions of Lightroom and Camera Raw have been synchronised. It is likely when LR4 is released they will be again.  Until then, realize you are working on a beta of the Next version of Lightroom with the current version of PS/ACR.

  • Good color/contrast cs4 Bridge; in Camera Raw files are overexposed...

    flat, and color is distorted. When files are opened into photoshop cs4, they appear as they
    do in Camera Raw, awful.
    I have re-downloaded cs4 from the adobe site, but the problem still persists.
    Any thoughts?
    Thank you for all response.

    flat, and color is distorted. When files are opened into photoshop cs4, they
    appear as they
    do in Camera Raw, awful.
    Maybe you could specify your problem a bit more, not sure I understand it
    now. Maybe you can also deliver a screenshot of the file in Bridge?
    If you have a raw file (do you??) you can change this settings in Camera Raw
    to the desired look before opening in PS. Changes made in Camera Raw will
    reflect in Bridge, they should appear the same.
    If you have changed the default RAW settings they might also cause this
    problem but your originals from camera can also be wrong.
    Hence my question for a bit more explanation.

  • Lens correction options in Camera Raw

    Hi!  I have CS5 on both my laptop and desktop (Mac) computers - on my desktop when I am in Camera Raw I get all the Lens correction profiles, ability to change horizontal / vertical etc, but on my desktop version, in the lens settings I only get Chromatic Aberration and vignetting options.  They are the same version of the program and were downloaded at the same time.  Can anyone please give some suggestions on how I can get all of the Lens correction options to appear on my laptop too.
    Thanks!

    Maybe show us a screenshot of what you see on the system that isn't want you expect.   What version of ACR are you using in each?  It should be visible in the title bar of the ACR plug-in if you unmaximize it, or you can do About Plug-ins / Camera Raw in PS.
    Here is the Manual tab of ACR 6.7 on Windows in CS5:

  • Lens correction tool in Camera Raw 6.0???

    I bought Photoshop CS5 last night and got everything loaded up.  The first thing I wanted to play with was the lens correction tool that is supposed to be in Camera Raw 6.0.  For the life of me, I can not find the barrel distortion corrections and auto CA corrections.  I find them in Photoshop, albeit a very limited selection of lenses (Canon's extremely popular EF 16-35L is not even an option) but not Camera Raw.  It does not appear to be an option under the lens correction tab.  What am I missing?
    Lance
    www.lancemoreland.com

    It will be in 6.1, not 6.0.
    See, for example, here:
    http://robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-10050-10649

  • Auto scale/crop with lens correction tool in Camera Raw 8.4

    Does anyone know if this type of functionality exists in Camera Raw 8.4 similar to the Auto scale function in the lens correction filter? I understand the straighten tool offers this effect but I'm looking for in auto crop or autoscale feature when using the lens correction tool. Thanks in advance!

    Good day!
    I notice no difference to prior to 8.4.
    But maybe the ACR Forum may be a better place for questions realted to ACR.
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/cameraraw
    Regards,
    Pfaffenbichler

  • Is it possible to use automatic lens correction profiles in Camera RAW using Extendscript?

    I have developed Javascripts using Extendscript toolkit to help me process batches of files for creating time lapse videos, and
    I would like to take advantage of the automatic lens correction profiles available in Adobe Camera RAW (I am using Adobe Photoshop CS6 64-bit), but in the CameraRAWOpenOptions, there is no property describing the automatic lens correction profiles.  It seems there has got to be a way to automate the selection of the "Enable Lens Profile Corrections" box when opening camera RAW images.  I am using Canon lenses, and the Adobe lens correction profiles work great, so I'd like to use them.
    I am aware of the other way of doing this in Photoshop using File-->Automate-->Lens Correction, but this seems to work more slowly than using the lens corrections in Camera RAW.
    Thanks.

    You don't need to bother...just set your Camera Raw "Defaults" to include Enable Lens Profile Corrections and check the Auto CA correction. Then go to the ACR flyout menu and select Save New Camera Raw Defaults...Note: if you have your ACR preferences set to have seperate defaults based on camera serial number and ISO, you'll need to save out seperate defaults for each camera and ISO you use.

  • Lightroom 3 to PS CS5 camera raw

    Hi
    On my Mac Pro (works on my Macbook Pro, though),  when I choose "Edit in PS" in LR 3, the raw file opens in PS but NOT in camera Raw.
    New to LR, but have extensively used CR processing, and would like to continue this practice.
    Will appreciate your guidance
    Thanks!

    All of the adjustments that you make in Lightroom are the same adjustments that would've been made in Adobe Camera Raw.  When Lightroom passes an image to Photoshop, Camera Raw interprets the Lightroom adjustments, but then passes the image on in to Photoshop.  If you still want to use Camera Raw you can open your images from Lightroom as smart objects.  Then, from Photoshop, you can open the image in Camera Raw and make changes to the adjustments that you made in Lightroom.  Everything is this way by design, and it sounds to me like everything is working properly on your computer.

  • Reversed B&W adjustment layer; export color channel to layer; CS5.1; Ps extended (Win 7 64-bit)

    I've had a serial number for 1 whole day, so I hope this isn't a completely ignorant question.
    What I want to do is to have an adjustment layer that is a reversed, black and white image.  I initially thought to merge B&W and reverse adjustment layers, but read that an adjustment layer may not be the target of a merge.  Is the way to accomplish this to fiddle with the B&W adjustment layer sliders somehow?
    Also, I think this is a related question, if I like how the black and white displayed image of a given color channel looks, how can I export that channel into a layer?
    Thanks!

    You can't merge adjustment layers, but you can clip one to the underlying layer (including another adjustment layer), so that it doesn't affect the layers below.
    Click between the two layers in the Layers panel while holding the alt key (the cursor will change). The keyboard shortcut is alt+ctrl+G (although I don't remember if this is the default shortcut or if I made it up...I lose track).
    As for turning a channel into a layer it's straightforward. Target the channel and copy, then target the RGB composite and paste (otherwise you'll just paste into the same channel).
    Edit: for having had a serial number for a whole day, I must say you have an excellent grasp of the concepts. Those questions aren't ignorant at all; quite the opposite

  • Problem going from Lightroom 3 to Camera Raw 4.1

    I edit in LR3 then export to the original folder. When I open the edited photo in Camera Raw it is completely different. Not only is it different but it looks terrible. I'm making sure that when I export it from Lightroom that I have the correct version of Camera Raw chosen so I'm not sure what the issue is. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

    Lightroom 3 is using the equivalent of ACR 6.x so ACR 4.1 cannot use the develop settings from that version of LR.
    Lightroom 1 is fully compatible with PS CS3 ACR 4.x

  • How to: DNG colors from pentax camera are completely different in camera raw compared to pentax soft

    Hi all, i have a problem.
    I always used adobe camera raw to manage RAW files. I find it really fast and friendly compared to many other programs (i mean lightroom, pentax digital camera utility, DxO optics pro, Silkypix, etc.). It has no rivals, on my macbook pro it is absolutely faster than others.
    BUT i found a lot of differences comparing colors (not just tone, but definition inside an object with similar colors) from a DNG using camera raw vs pentax digital camera utility 4. It is a know problem by pentax people. You can check (without the camera) the problem here (see the colorcheker chart): http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxkx/page14.asp
    I can post examples of what i mean speaking of "definition inside an object with similar colors"...
    I always use the "embedded" camera profile in camera raw, finding it more similar to the pentax software. The adobe standard is really different.
    Is there a way i can bypass this issue? using pentax digital software is really boring…it's unfriendly, SLOW, with bad light adjustments and interface.
    I tried opening the DNG with pentax software and converting it to tiff: the colors are ok, but you lose a lot adjusting light etc.
    thank you all

    > I don't know anything, and haven't read anything, about the unique characteristics of Pentax DNG files.
    firmware in cameras that can create raw files in .DNG format (Pentax, Samsung, Ricoh, Leica) will write so called DNG profile in those raw files (see Sandy's comments) - those profiles are not identical to what Adobe creates to use w/ ACR/LR, but they also can be used by Adobe raw converters (you will get a little different colors)... you can extract those profiles from native DNG raw files for example using Adobe DNG profile editor... in addition, Pentax cameras (modern) can create raw files either in their own PEF format or in DNG format and Pentax suppied software (DCU) can in fact create DNG files from PEF files and unlike Adobe DNG converter DCU will do that w/o discarding any information and it will write Pentax DNG profile in those converted DNG files.

  • Camera Raw 4.6 Color Conversion Issues

    I'm using CS3. In the Camera Raw 4.6 import window the color looks great. When I get the image into Photoshop the color looks horrible. I know it's the color profile that Raw is assigning. My question... is there a way to disable the color profile conversion coming from Camera Raw?
    I've always had great results without using profiles and now this alters my color. I've even tried to go in and force the image to use a different color profile but at this point the damage has been done by the camera raw plugin.

    "I've been doing professional color correction for about 15 years and know how to use the programs without the use of color profiles."
    You're always using profiles no matter what, both a source and and destination for everything from your monitor to working RGB, CMYK and Lab to output profiles for proofing and print.
    You need good profiles to define the hardware devices and color spaces. Without them, it's all only a guess.
    "When I say "great color", I mean to say Photoshop doesn't adjust my color with profiles because I have profiles disabled."
    There's not really a way to disable profiles in Photoshop. You can sort of turn them off, but the default profiles in your Color Settings dialog are still in effect no matter what. In fact, you can't even display in image in RGB or CMYK without at least two profile, and more often three.
    Just having profile in the loop doesn't mean that Photoshop will "adjust" your colors. Photoshop will only do what you tell it to do.
    "My monitor is corrected and I have no need to use profiles since I understand UCR & GCR conversion for printing."
    You monitor is corrected? How? Have you calibrated it? After the calibration Photoshop needs, you guessed it, a monitor profile, in order to properly display your images. And how to you get from the RGB of your digital captures to the CMYK you need for offset? Yeah. Profiles. Even if you're using the archaic and outdated Custom CMYK to set your total ink and black generation, you are still in effect, using profiles. You are using the parameters defined there in the same way custom measurement are used in ProfileMaker to generate a custom ICC profile. It's just not as accurate.
    "Also, when I have something printed somewhere I have them disable their profiles to provide true color. And I also force acrobat to use my color maps when building pdfs so my printer has no need for conversion of any kind."
    How you do know you've made the right conversion for that printer. Most printer just ignore embedded profiles anyway, but including proper output profiles can enable them to display the files correctly on their calibrated screens, and for the more advanced printers, that embedded profile can allow them to use Device Link Profiles to convert your files to custom press or proofing profiles.
    "My complaint was that the Camera Raw Plug-in forces me to convert to a profile with 4 possible choices. I was asking if there is a way to disable this?"
    It's actually a choice of four different profiles not a profile with four choices. The choices are based on color gamut and gamma in order of increased gamut. There is no way to disable them. What would you put in their place? There are raw converters that will let you convert the raw data to any color space on output, including CMYK. Maybe that would be more appropriate for you. CaptureOne and Raw Developer are the two that come to mind, but they all use profiles.
    Hell, even in the golden age of the drum scanner, scanners like the Hell 3010 without even being able to see an image on screen, used profiles, only they called them by a different name - lookup tables. Lookup tables for scanner input and characteristic lookup tables for the analog proofing system the house used.
    "I found if I convert using the Adobe 1998 profile the color comes out close, I simply have to increase the saturation to return to the original optical image values. I would however like to bypass this step."
    It sounds to me like you need to spend a few weeks getting up to date with the tools that are available now. Between hardware monitor calibration and custom CMYK output profiles that take into account different ink limits and black generation, you're missing out on a boatload of fun.
    A lot of things have changed in prepress in the last fifteen years not the least of which is that little number called Direct to Plate. Since everone has gone DTP, the one thing that has gone by the wayside are any kind of overall proofing standards. Where you used to be able to send the same file to ten different printers and get back proofs that were extremely close, now they're all over the map. The only way to effectively deal with this is with custom profiles for the high end digital proofers that printers use today.
    Sure, you still need to take into account the specifics of total ink, highlight and shadow values, but you simply can't rely on the positively ancient ink definitions in Custom CMYK to work very well for any of today's output. Unless, of course, you and your clients don't mind going through rounds and rounds of proofs.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error during Import & Export of rules - RAR 5.2

    Hi all, We tried exporting the rule set from Production to the Quality system (as we wanted to make changes in the quality system and then move to the production again). For this we followed the step by step procedure provided in the configuration gu

  • DropDown in Table using WD ABAP

    Hi Gurus, I am trying to populate dynamic values in a dropdown. This dropdown is in a table on the form. My context design is:      DataSource ( cardinality 1..1)       --> TableNode ( cardinality 0..n)          --> Drop_Down ( cardinality 1..n)     

  • Error while posting Inbound Delivery

    I am trying to post inbound delivery and getting error that there is no item avaialble on the Purchase order. Please help. Thanks in advance.

  • Regarding the functional modules

    hi, there are three types of function modules are there. 1)normal functional modules 2)remote functional modules 3)update functional modules what is the update functional modules? please provide me the information regarding this functiional modules

  • Characterstic Values in Batch Master record

    Hi, Is there any report where in characterstic values can be seen for batch master records? Regards, Prasad