Lightroom 4 Keywords

I've been experimenting with LR4, but can't figure out how to reset all keywords and restart from scratch.
I've deleted every catalog I can find (they were all under a Lightroom folder under Pictures).
I start Lightroom and create a new catalog.  I exit, delete the default catalog and restart.
I import a folder with about 6 images, each with a few non-hierarchical keywords.
Lightroom gets inventive and puts them into hierarchies that it remembered from earlier in the day when I had imported keywords from Bridge and then tried to fix the mess Lightroom made of them.  Where is it getting these old hierarchies from??
How do I stop this nonsense and start clean?

The answer seems to be that Lightroom doesn't play nice with other programs that keyword tag files, even the JPG files which I started with.
In addition to tags that other programs can see, Lightroom seems to put its own hidden tagging information in JPGs (and who knows what it does with other files).  Went one removes the tags with another program, Lightroom still finds its own hidden information.
Can someone point me to a detailed explanation from Adobe of what really happens with different file types?
Only solution seemed to be to use Lightroom to remove ALL tags from the files I previously tagged in Bridge and start over (in Bridge).
One thing I really don't like about tagging with Lightroom:
Assume you have a hierarchical tag like:  Birds > Ducks > Mallard
If you apply just the Mallard and the Ducks tags with Bridge, that's all that put in the file and all other programs see.
If you apply just the Mallard and Ducks tags with Lightroom, it seems to know that you've just added those tags, not the Birds tags.  But if you look at the file with another program (Bridge, Windows Explorer, etc.) all three tags have been applied.
What's even worse, if after tagging in LR I go back to Bridge and remove the "Birds" tag, and then come back to Lightroom and try to change the tags again or remove them all I get a "metadata write error" from LR4 which I have no idea how to resolve.
The only reason I bought Lightroom was for cataloging, and I'm experimenting with LR4 to try out the new ACR features.  I've had so much trouble with the tags that I haven't even had a chance to look at the new ACR features.

Similar Messages

  • Lightroom KEYWORDS searchable in SPOTLIGHT?

    I was looking through the discussion boards but couldn't find an answer...here's my question.
    If I enter keywords into Adobe Lightroom and save the metadata back to the original file, can spotlight search by these keywords??? I know in Tiger this didn't work but I was hoping it would in Leopard. I know that Lightroom isn't 100% compatible with Leopard yet but I thought someone may have the answer. Thanks in advance Mac community
    j

    You can tell spotlight to index it with this command. Change the VolName to whatever you call the drive.sudo mdutil -i on /Volumes/volName

  • Lightroom keyword hierarchy behaviour

    what is the conceptual difference between explicitly adding a top level keyword to an image vs having the top level keyword being added automatically by adding one of its lower level "child" keywords to the image?
    I don't see why there should be any conceptual difference but for some reason, Lightroom treats them differently - the former places a checkmark next to the top level keyword and includes it in the keyword counter (which would be my preferred behaviour), whereas the latter places a hyphen and does not include it in the counter.  What is the hyphen meant to indicate?  It's undesirable because the counter doesn't tell me at a glance how many images are tagged with that group of (parent keyword+lower level keywords).
    Note that in terms of the actual keywords that are tagged or exported with the image, there is absolutely no difference.  So it's strange that the keywords panel distinguishes between the two.
    I'm using Lightroom 3.6 on Lion.

    There's currently no way in LR 3 or 4 beta to get the behavior you want.  You could submit a suggestion to the feedback forum that Adobe employees read:
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/products/photoshop_family_photoshop_lightro om

  • Lightroom Keywords not showing in Bridge

    Hi all!
    Our companyy photographer uses Lightroom to archive and keyword all of his pictures, which is fine!
    The graphic designer, who uses the pictures (that's me!) has to search the picture archives using Bridge (again, fine).
    However, the keywords that the photographer painstakingly puts in when he imports images into Lightroom do not show up when I search using Bridge!
    We have tried selecting images in Lightroom and hitting Command-S to save the keywords to the file itself. But this doesn't seem to work!
    Anyone got any suggestions / help?
    For reference, we are both using up-to-date desktops and software (as of March 2010).

    Just tried two files with keyword in Lightroom 2 and using Export as PSD to
    a folder I have pointed Bridge to. Using the quick search at top of the path
    bar or find command in Bridge does provided me the files with that keyword
    *However, the keywords that the photographer painstakingly puts in when he
    imports images into Lightroom do not show up when I search using Bridge!*
    We have tried selecting images in Lightroom and hitting Command-S to save the
    keywords to the file itself. But this doesn't seem to work!

  • Lightroom keywords in Bridge?

    I hope that I'm overlooking some very simple thing, but none of my keywords that I have set for my pictures in Lightroom show up in Bridge (nor are they searchable).
    Also, if the keywords do not work together in both programs, what would the purpose of Bridge be?
    Thanks for helping me!

    Yes, that's correct. You can do this one time by selecting the whole catalog, and selecting all and running that. Depending on number of images and processor, make a cup of coffee, go out for a cuppa, or dinner and a movie, or let it run over night. Then you'd hit Cmd-S only for the ones you corrected or changed or just added. You can also have this (and all metadata) written out automatically if that suits your workflow and isn't too slow, which it is for some setups.
    LR and/or Bridge- long debated by some. I just prefer LR as it does more for me than Bridge. But Bridges is very useful, too. Again, tomes have been written on this.

  • Extensis Portfolio 8.1.1 and Lightroom - keywords question

    Hi, I've imported images to Lightroom that have had keywords applied using Portfolio (an Extensis product). Once imported into Lightroom, however, Lightroom does not show these keywords. It only shows those keywords applied using Photoshop CS2. Is there a way, short of reentering all that data, to get Lightroom to recognize these Portfolio keywords?
    Thanks for any help,
    DLMST

    Got a little mixed up between threads. Portfolio is scriptable, so it would be possible to generate xmp sidecars which Lightroom would then be able to read.
    John

  • Lightroom Keyword Searching in Windows

    Hello all. First Would Like to give a big Thanks to all the people that answer questions around here, I normally dont have to post because i can find my answers in the previous questions. Well not this time, so here goes. When I keyword in lightroom I was wondering if there is a setting or prefrence to check that will submit my keywords to the actual windows property box of the photo(the box where you right-click on the photo and choose properties)in that box there is a keyword heading and i want to transfer my keywords to this box and I believe I can search from withing windows to locate these photos, although i am unsure on that i want to try. I have tried exporting photos and saving metadata and that didn't work. The reason i am trying to do this is so that when I work on photos for people and I send them back they dont need lightroom or photoshop to search through large amounts of files to locate photos. Sorry for being long winded but i am trying to be as complete as possible. any help would be greatly Appreciated.THANKS in advance

    Hi mmbamrski and OP,
    I think of keywords in Lightroom as being "for Lightroom's eyes only". But then:
    - Set "include on export" attribute for keywords that should be visible externally.
    - Upon export, do NOT export as Lightroom hierarchy (for maximum compatibility with non-Lightroom consumers).
    Then after finishing in Lightroom, I always export jpegs for outside consumption.
    WIndows can search these exported jpegs and see the keyword metadata in them. And, they can also be used for any other purposes without having to go into Lightroom and do a special-purpose export (screen-saver, slide-shows, photo-books, web, email, CDs, serving via DLNA ...)
    I find these plugins useful in this regard:
    TreeSync
    ExportManager
    Hope this helps,
    Rob

  • Lightroom Keywording question...

    I am pretty comfortable with Lightroom, but there is one scenario that can be frustrating.
    I am keywording a new batch of photos. I am on a photo and assign 5 keywords. I then right arrow to the next photo and I want to "dupe" all 5 keywords from the previous photo (e.g. copy/paste)...
    There doesn't seem to be an easy way (button or keyboard shortcut)...
    Any suggestions?
    Right now I either:
    * Click all the keywords in recent keyword list (a pain)
    * Go "back" and copy / paste
    Any suggestions would be grateful.

    There are many ways. One is to use the keyword spray can (should be on the bottom toolbar), the other main way is to copy metadata (from the metadata menU, the shortcut is different in windows and Mac OS, so check the shortcut there), select keywords as what to copy and paste the metadata over your other image.
    Edit: Oh I didn't notice you were using the zoom view, yeah there it is a little harder.

  • Lightroom Keyword Issue

    Greetings. I'm running the 64-bit version of LR3.3 on Windows 7, but I've had this issue since before the upgrade. I have a long list of keywords. I'm finding that if I expand my keyword list keywords near the bottom third are not selectable, even though it shows how many photos are tagged with them. If I open up a metadata filter and scroll to the bottom of my keyword column I get the same results. However, if I do a find and specify a keyword that way it will bring the photos up. I haven't found anything in the forums regarding this problem. Does anybody have any suggestions?
    Thanks.

    It's a problem with how the list was coded in Lightroom which involved a failure to code around a limitation on the Windows platform. Lists of keywords longer than around 1600 items are truncated. I don't think you'll see a quick fix for it, but I hope it will happen in LR4.
    As a workaround, put your keywords into a simple hierarchy.
    John

  • Elements tags into Lightroom keywords AND maintain structure?

    Hi, I would like to move from using Elements to using Lightroom. Whilst I realise that I can import my catalogue and photos, which should also create all my keywords, I am concerned that the existing keywords/tags parent/child structure would be lost? They would be created as a single contiguous list?
    Can anyone confirm this is the case, and if so, does anyone know how to go about moving the tags across whilst maintaining the original structure AND remaining associated with the correct photos?
    Thanks,
    Gareth

    Just to add to what Jeremy2 said:
    You do NOT import the photos. Let me say that again. You do NOT import the photos.
    You use the menu command File->Upgrade Photoshop Elements Catalog

  • Lightroom video keywords to FCPX?

    I've got years of video archived in Lightroom, and now that FCPX can import Finder keywords, does anyone know a way to get Lightroom keywords into FCPX as well? thanks,

    The Video Presets may be applied from the Quick Develop panel of the Library Module.

  • Web module: exporting keywords to a template not possible?

    I want to use the web module to generate my photoblog, however I need to be able to export the keywords or collections used to tag each image. The dialog box for changing the image caption allows you to export all sorts of EXIF and IPTC metadata but not the lightroom keywords.
    I've already made a template for my website but the generated xml file produced by lightroom for the transformer XSLT script to process seems to have no information about the image keywords in it so I'm stuck.
    I know the keywords are embedded into the actual jpegs that are exported but extracting them would be more effort than its worth, I dont want to have to run more software after exporting from the web module just to get the keywords.
    Any ideas?

    Looking at the XMP for a recent file, the keywords are stored as follows
         castle
         cloghan castle
         couple
         matrimony
         september
         wedding
    So you'd need to figure out how to extract them from there.

  • Keywords not appearing in Windows

    A quick google search has revealed that this is a pretty common problem - Keywords created in Aperture don't show up in Windows programs. But the why of it is a little difficult to wrap my brain around.
    Here's the workflow: I'm scanning a bunch of images into jpg format, correcting and tagging them in Aperture, then exporting back to jpg format.
    From what I understand (please check me on this), Aperture stores keywords in IPTC format, which is baked into the jpg when the versions are exported. Since this is a newer format (?) and Microsoft doesn't follow anyone's standards but their own, the IPTC metadata is not visible in Windows Explorer or in Windows-based software. Am I right so far?
    When I do this same workflow in Lightroom, the metadata shows up fine. As I understand it, that's because Lightroom saves the metadata in XMP format, which is visible in Windows? Or is it saving to EXIF format? I read somewhere that XMP metadata can only be saved as a separate file (a sidecar). Is that true or is it also baked into the jpg?
    Here's the bottom line: Aperture has facial recognition, Lightroom does not. So I would like to use Aperture and have my keywords recognized anywhere by anything. What is the solution? Has anyone developed some metadata cross-stamping software that works? (I tried downloading one made for Windows but it didn't work on Windows 7.) Or is there a plug-in I can use with Aperture to solve the problem?
    And this may not be a question that can be answered in this forum, but when I add a keyword in Lightroom, how is it being saved that allows me to see it in Windows? Is that XMP or EXIF?
    I've been researching this for two days and have learned just enough to leave me utterly baffled. I appreciate any help y'all can offer.

    UPDATE
    I ran some additional tests on Windows 7 and it appears that Aperture keywords don't show up in ANY of the following:
    - Windows Explorer
    - Microsoft Office Picture Manager
    - Windows Live Photo Gallery
    Notice a common denominator? All Microsoft software.
    Picasa for Windows DOES, however, see the keywords (though it has many other problems).
    Meanwhile, Lightroom keywords are recognized universally.
    I looked at the metadata using ExifTool (what a handy app) and it appears that both Lightroom and Aperture are writing to IPTC, but neither is writing to XMP. That's not what I expected at all. So perhaps they're writing to different versions of IPTC? I can't tell what they're writing to - does Aperture write to IPTC-Core or IPTC-IIM? Whatever it is, Windows does not read it.
    Anyone have any more info on how all this works?

  • Lightroom Tags in Photoshop Elements 5

    I have a huge PSE5 tagged catalog, but now I work in Lightroom and want to add keyworded JPEGs back into my PSE5 catalog. When I bring these Lightroom keyworded photos into PSE5 the tags aren't recognized. Is it possible to do this?

    Did you write out your metadata in LR?

  • Duplicate Keywords in Keywording Panel

    I kind of have a lack of knowledge about keyword hierarchies already installed and being used.  This question is going to be less than together. 
    I will have imported all my photos into Lightroom already.  Their associated keywords should be in the Keyword Panel.  (I have not done this yet.) 
    The bulk of the imported will have been keyworded in Nikon View 6.0.0.  (I had no flat keyword list or hierarchical keyword list already in Nikon View.)  I keyworded these photos into Nikon View's IPTC from looking at a independent paper list.  The rest of the recent photos imported will have been keyworded inside Lightroom and/or  keyworded from Nikon View NX2 and imported.  [I haven't decided yet which one I will keyword from, Lightroom or NX2...unless you have a suggestion.] 
    The Keyword Hierarchy will have been made up after the bulk of my photos have been imported...  In short I'm trying to give you a future scenario of my work flow at this point so I can start asking questions.
    I have read of people having trouble with duplicate keywords being added to the Lightroom Keyword List Panel after they get their keyword list/hierarchy set up.  The following thoughts about unwanted duplicate keywords turning up in a keyword hierarchy I read and am not 100% clear on:
    'The trouble with hierarchical keywords is they always end up with child keywords somehow re-appearing at the top level.  It can happen when they re-import a picture that's been processed in another app.  Or when a group of child keywords becomes duplicated in more than one part of the hierarchy.  Usually because they have changed the hierarchy at some point and imported an older file.  Or they changed the hierarchy on a laptop and then brought files over to the main PC.  Something always upsets the logical structure they have put into place.  So rather than continue with this problem, they have gone back to a flat list in Lightroom.'
    Could someone spell out what is above so I am 100% sure I think I know what is it saying?  Are there any more instances I could get an unwanted duplicate keyword or keywords in the Panel?  So it is not a good idea to change the Hierarchy after you get it set up?  How about additions?
    I'm scared now to start a hiearchy!  Scared for problems it might cause in the future.  I like the idea you can filter search on a whole category or subcategory.  It's easier to zip down to find a keyword.  Especially with 700 plus keywords.  I'm scared to impliment it.  Could anyone explain?  Thank You So Much for any information!
    Sandy

    'The trouble with hierarchical keywords is they always end up with child keywords somehow re-appearing at the top level.  It can happen when they re-import a picture that's been processed in another app.  Or when a group of child keywords becomes duplicated in more than one part of the hierarchy.  Usually because they have changed the hierarchy at some point and imported an older file.  Or they changed the hierarchy on a laptop and then brought files over to the main PC.  Something always upsets the logical structure they have put into place.  So rather than continue with this problem, they have gone back to a flat list in Lightroom.'
    Could someone spell out what is above so I am 100% sure I think I know what is it saying?  Are there any more instances I could get an unwanted duplicate keyword or keywords in the Panel?  So it is not a good idea to change the Hierarchy after you get it set up?  How about additions?
    In my opinion, someone has written something that implies a terrible thing has happened (duplicate keywords), when in fact duplicate keywords can be avoided by maintaining a structured workflow; then if a duplicate keyword does appear (because you didn't maintain the structured workflow, or like most people, you just plain made a mistake), this isn't a terrible thing; in fact, this is something that might take 20 seconds to fix in Lightroom.
    The structured workflow I am thinking of is the following: if you have keywords added by other software, import all (yes ALL) of the photos into Lightroom, and then clean up the hierarchy to be the way you want it to be. Then, there is never another instance of importing photos that already have keywords. From that point forward, do all of your keywording in Lightroom, and you will not likely get duplicate keywords.
    And if you do find a keyword that is out of place, you have several choices:
    Panic, and never use Lightroom again
    Gouge your eyes out so you can't see the problem any more
    stay calm and drag the keyword to where it should be in the hierarchy
    As opposed to keywords out of place, duplicate keywords also give you choices. You can use choice #1 or choice #2 to solve the problem, or you can (Choice #3) simply apply the correct keyword to the photos, and then delete the duplicate.
    I'm scared now to start a hiearchy!  Scared for problems it might cause in the future.  I like the idea you can filter search on a whole category or subcategory.  It's easier to zip down to find a keyword.  Especially with 700 plus keywords.  I'm scared to impliment it.  Could anyone explain?  Thank You So Much for any information!
    Over my several years of using Lightroom, I do find that I accidentally put keywords in the wrong place. The problem is fixed, via choice #3 above, in under 20 seconds. Also, over my time using Lightroom, my photography subject matter has changed, or my organizing needs have changed, and I have re-arranged parts of my hierarchy to suit my new needs, and/or added new top level keywords or middle level keywords or bottom level keywords. It is relatively painless and simple. The biggest problem (and yes, it is a problem) is when you have to drag a keyword from the top of the hierarchy to the bottom (beyond the bottom of the screen), scrolling isn't as smooth as it should be, but it still works. This is hardly a reason to avoid hierarchical keywords.
    Honestly, I think someone has placed bad thoughts in your head.

  • People tags in Lightroom 6 and Windows Live Photo Gallery

    I think I'm finally ready to make the switch to lightroom from WLPG for photos management. I've used LR for a long time to do the edits but people tags are huge and kept all of my photo management in WLPG. I have 100k organized photos and they are all people tagged in WLPG. I just started the LR6 trial and noticed it doesn't honor existing WLPG people tags. Is there a way to import them / avoid redoing people tags for 100k pictures? Which, simply won't happen.
    Side question - people tags and coordinates export with jpg outputs from LR6 (assuming I don't intentionally turn them off at export), correct?

    Below is the solution to get face tags from windows photo gallery to Lightroom for me. Be sure to backup your files.
    *** Backup your files ***
    Step 1: Mopve the people names and the rectangles for the people into a different field in the .jpg metadata
    Download Exiftool
    I ran the command below from the command prompt and in the folder with exiftool and the configuration file found from the link below:
    exiftool.exe -config ExifTool_config_convert_regions "-regioninfo<myregion" "foldername" -m -r -overwrite_originals_in_place
    "foldername" is the folder / path you want to make the change for. -m ignores minor errors, -r includes subfolders, -overwrite... means it will NOT create the otherwise default backup for each file changes (filename.jpg_original).
    Copy Windows Photo Gallery face tags to Google Picasa
    Step 2: Move people names to keywords for Lightroom. Do this if you're using lightroom, do not do it if you're using picassa. I haven't yet been able to check to see but I'm guessing I will have to "convert it to a person tag" in lightroom keywords since they show as descriptive tags but I have tested everything else.
    Add the people names to the keywords
    exiftool "-xmp:subject+<regionname" FolderName -overwrite_origional_in_place -m -r
    Where FolderName is the folder / path the pictures you want to edit are in
    This came from:
    Migrating from WPG to Lightroom 6 - People Tags

Maybe you are looking for

  • Visual Studio Designer complianing about ObservableCollection in XAML?

    I have a property on an object that is exposed like this: /// <summary> /// A collection of images and their keys for assembling the <see cref="ImageSelector"/> controls. /// </summary> [ContentProperty("ImageSource")] public class ImageDictionary //

  • Field Containg embedded line breaks

    Hi Experts, I am doing FCC in sender File adapter. My field separator is "I" and Record separator is "\n". In my .txt input file, one of field contains embedded line breaks and Adapter is taking that break as end of that record. Without changing the

  • External HD kills power to AEBS

    Hi again all, Well my Airport Extreme (802.11n) has been shutting off when I try to access my 1Tb external HD which is connected to the AEBS via USB A-B cable. This just started last night. My solution is to shut off my external HD, unplug the power

  • Problem with group by/order by clause when using huge data

    Hi, I'm using below query on my table of size more than 210 million rows. SELECT booking_date FROM T_UTR WHERE four_eyes_status = 'A' AND booking_date <= '01-jul-2005' AND booking_date >= '01-jan-2004' AND invoice_id IS NULL AND link_id = 12345 AND b

  • Stage size for a Flash website?

    I am taking a beginners Flash course and our final project is to create a movie/website in Flash. 100% Flash based. In a previous course, I made an HTML site. For this project, I am recreating that website in Flash. But what should the stage size be?