Lightroom 5: Export jpeg Ordner Struktur

Hallo,
wie schön - ich habe mir LR5 gekauft und auch gleich die vielen tollen Möglichkeiten genutzt, viele Fotos zu bearbeiten, croppen, Licht zu korrigieren etc - und das jetzt alles in einem Programm statt in vielen.
Das Problem ist jetzt nur: Jetzt habe ich ca. 2000 Fotos bearbeitet und sortiert - aber wie bekomme ich nun die fertig bearbeiteten Fotos aus LR wieder heraus?
Also: workflow:
- ich bringe alle meine JPG (ich nutze bisher kein RAW) nach LR.
Dort bearbeite ich und sortiere ich in eine Ordnerstruktur einsortiert. (tatsächliche Filesystem-Ordner).
Mit dem Ziel: alle Dateien mitsamt den durchgeführten Bearbeitungen in der Sortierung wie ich sie erstellt habe, exportieren, um sie für eine Website und für die Weitergabe an andere Leute nutzen zu können, die kein LR haben.
Wenn ich "als Katalog exportiere", habe ich zwar die Sortierung, dafür aber alle Dateien im Original ohne meine Bearbeitungen. Das ist natürlich nicht der Sinn der Sache.
Und auf die Veröffentlichungsdienste (sei es "Festplatte" oder "Koken" (Foto-CMS mit LR-plugin)) kann man immer nur einzelne Fotos ziehen, nie ganze Ordnerstrukturen.
Das nutzt mir natürlich gar nichts. Da muss ich ja wieder vor vorne anfangen mit sortieren. Manuell aus dem Filesystem heraus wegkopieren geht auch nicht, weil dann ja meine ganzen Bearbeitungen weg sind.
- Ich habe es mit dem Plugin "jf Folder Publisher" probiert, was eigentlich laut Anleitung genau dafür da sein soll, aber auch hier kann ich
-- weder einen Ordner aus der Ordnerstruktur "lokaler Datenträger" auf die Veröffentlichung ziehen, noch
-- eine komplette Sammlung
sondern immer nur einzelne Fotos.
Das bedeutet, ich muss die gesamte Ordnerstruktur nochmals von Hand im publish-plugin neu nachbilden. Das geht jetzt in diesem Fall, weil es nur ~20 sind, aber das nächste Projekt dürfte locker 3000 Fotos in 50 Ordnern haben, da wird das nichts mehr.
Was übersehe ich?
Es muss doch irgendwie möglich sein, die fertig bearbeiteten Fotos aus LR auch irgendwie wieder herauszubekommen, um sie anderswo nutzen zu können?!
Bitte helft mir!
Danke!
Jan

Hallo,
leider kann ich Ihnen nur teilweise antworten.
Sie schrieben:
"Wenn ich "als Katalog exportiere", habe ich zwar die Sortierung, dafür aber alle Dateien im Original ohne meine Bearbeitungen. Das ist natürlich nicht der Sinn der Sache."
Damit ihre Bearbeitungen gespeichert werden, müssen Sie die Metadaten mit abspeichern. Markieren Sie dazu alle Bilder und klicken in Lightroom auf Metadaten - Metadaten in Datei speichern oder benutzen Sie den Shortcut Strg + S (unter Windows) .
Wenn Sie möchten, dass ihre Änderungen automatisch gespeichert werden, könne Sie das in den Katalogeinstellungen ändern. Gehen Sie in Lightroom auf Bearbeiten - Katalogeinstellungen und unter dem Reiter Metadaten können sie das Kästchen "Änderungen automatisch in XMP speichern" aktivieren.
Wenn Sie nun einen Ordner "als Katalog exportieren" sollten Sie eigentlich die Bearbeitungen beibehalten.

Similar Messages

Lightroom not exporting jpegs from a nikon d750?

I know lightroom doesn't support the RAW files from the d750 but I understood it supports the jpeg files. However, when I go to export them it acts as if its doing it but it doesn't. I am doing everything as usual, but the picture does not come up when I am trying to export it to. I don't know what to do.

However, when I go to export them it acts as if its doing it but it doesn't.
Could you please explain this in detail? Exactly what do you see, exactly what happens? If there is an error message please quote the complete error message exactly as it appear, word-for-word, verbatim.
Also, please let us know your export settings, perhaps a screen capture of the export dialog box File Sizing section. Thanks.

Why does my PS work better than my Lightroom 5 exporting jpegs from raw files?

So,
I'm editing some raw files with Lightroom 5
but when I export the jpg file, the result is terrible, it looks washed out, loses contrast, noise levels are higher than the edited file on suite
However, if I do the same thing using camera raw through PsCS6, the exported jpg is perfect. Any reason for that to happen?
've been reading a lot about color spaces, and I don't think is the case, since the same doesn't happen with photoshop.
Also, it might be worth mentioning I'm exporting B&W images
Thanks!

ok
just to illustrate the problem a little better, here's the actual difference
this is what I have in Lightroom after editing:
and here's what I get after exporting

Exporting Jpegs from Lightroom - DPI question

When I export Jpegs from Lightroom, I set the dpi to 300 pixels per inch. I do not specify a max width or height. When I view these files in Adobe Bridge (CS2 or CS3) the file info says 300dpi. However, when I open the files in Photoshop and select image size, It says 72dpi and has the document size set to very large. I realize that I can enter 300 dpi and uncheck the resample box, I am just confused as to why this is happening.
My concern is, that I upload my images directly to my lab after exporting from Lightroom. Will this cause problems?
Thanks in advance!
David

the image resolution is a combination of the two parameters you mention: size and dpi. a very large size at 72 dpi is equivalent to a small size (like 3x5) at very high dpi. for printing you want at least 240 dpi at the largest size that allows you to keep that resolution. for screen presentations or your web site you want jut 72 dpi. 72 dpi and 2x3 inches will require a very small file size.
I suggest you to export images at TIFF and not JPEG as that will allow you to preserve the image quality when doing editing in PS.
In my case I export TIFF for PS (when I need PS editing) and 72 dpi JPEG for my web site (that way if somebody downloads my image illegally thy get a poor resolution copy). But since LR works very well for me 90% of the images re just kept in raw mode and I print from LR.

Lightroom 4.1 exported JPEG files are not recognized by Apple Preview App

I just started using Lightroom 4.1 Trial version (coming from Aperture). I exported JPEG versions of some images using an ICC profile. On my iMac running Lion 10.7.5 the pictures do not show a thumbnail, the file on the desktop just shows "JPEG". I could not open the file with the Preview App, but I am able to open it with DPP (Canon software)? Also the file shows that it has 0 x 0 dimentions when I click Get Info even though it is about 25 Megs in size?
The message I get is
"The file “Edit-739820120223Canon EOS 7D.jpg” could not be opened.
It may be damaged or use a file format that Preview doesn’t recognize."
Does anyone know why this is hapening?
Is it a know issue between Adobe and Apple?
Is there a fix for this?
Thanks for help in advance.

25MB is quite a large filesize for a JPG, and this might be either quite a lot of pixels saved at a very "high" quality (not very much compressed), or it may be an extremely large number of pixels saved with medium compression.
While the technical spec of the JPG format imposes an absolute limit on maximum width and height pixel dimensions, some software employs a lower limit above which it considers the file to be invalid. Different programs, different limits, sometimes.
I have encountered this (for example) with pano stitched images using the full resolution of a large number of component shots - where JPG output could not be made, or if made, could not even be viewed as a whole by my standard image viewer (though TIFF was still OK even at still larger sizes).
If Lightroom has been set to a large printed size AND to a high ppi resolution, it is easy to get into very high numbers and very large output files. One should IMO at least question the utility and benefit of using very high ratios of upsampling from a standard digital photo - which may happen in some cases as a result of using the same output settings regardless, when spreading the same data across both small and large scales. If the file that was imported into LR really does provide an unusually high number of pixels expressing lots of detail, then that will better deserve such a capacious output file. Otherwise, each part of the file may merely show a very highly detailed representation, of a very blurry nothing-much-in-particular.
If the JPG has exceeded the viewer's size limits, a reported width and height of 0 may represent an error message, in effect - not actual reality.
regards, RP

Lightroom 5.5 jpeg export problem

I am using jAlbum to create photo albums on the web with images exported with Lightroom. Since I am using Lightroom 5.5 for the export I am get an error message whenever I create an Album with jAlbum which says "inconsistent metadata read from stream". As jAlbum uses Java the Java version may aslo matter. I am using the latest Java update from Oracle on a Windows 7 Professional x64 machine. With images exported with Lightroom 5.4 there is no problem. Also changing metadata options in Lightroom's export dialog did not help.
Is there a known problem with the Lightroom 5.5 export?
Wolfgang

Same here with LR 5.5. Just generated a few hundred jpegs to further process them in web applications for some online albums. One example is a QNAP NAS that has to generate smaller jpegs. It was working perfectly with LR5.4 and all older versions of LR. But as soon as I exported jpegs from LR 5.5 only grey rescaled images with some "noise" are depicted/generated. Had to go back to LR5.4 and it is now working as expected.
Adobe: Please do not try to fix something when it is not broken and get a fix for the "fix" ASAP. This is not acceptable for the prices we pay as we are not talking about freeware or shareware where somebody is programming in his free time. Most likely these guys would have already posted a fix for the issue.
Do your homework and please do it fast!

Very dull color of Lightroom exported JPEG

My exported JPEG images from Lightroom turn out to be very dull in prints. My monitor is calibrated with EYE ONE (Color Management System). Used correct color space for the printing company (either sRGB or AdobeRGB) I followed instruction about Export process. But still color is not right. Is there anything I should do to get the same color quality as I see in the Lightroom? I think images in the lightroom show much brighter than they are after print (by printing company like Costco/Blurb/Shutterfly) Thank you very much for your help!

You need to have your monitor fairly dim (80-130 lumens or so) to reproduce color. I thought eyeone actually calibrates brightness but I could be wrong. Most people have their monitors set far too bright. Next, you need to look at your pictures using a good fairly bright lamp with much higher color temperature than most desk lamps. If you are getting dull prints (as opposed to just dark) the likely culprit is the wrong colorspace or bad calibration. Some calibrators simply turn out to be broken. Do the pictures look dull too after export in another managed app such as Photoshop, preview, etc? Lastly, you have to realize that it is simply not possible to reproduce every color you can see on a good screen on paper. This can lead to lower saturation. This is the reason why soft proofing is important, which unfortunately is not yet possible in Lightroom.

Aperture vs Adobe Lightroom (Beta 3) JPEG exports

I've been beta-testing the Adobe Lightroom product and comparing it to Aperture. I'm using Aperture 1.1.1 on a MacBook Pro.
Lightroom has some intriguing features, but I've noticed a wildly different color when exporting the same image to JPEG format from Lightroom and Aperture.
I took the same RAW image from a shot I took with my Nikon D70 and exported a JPEG from Aperture using default settings with no color adjustment. In Lightroom I exported the same image to Photoshop, and then exported a JPEG with default settings and no color adjustment.
Look at the difference:
https://www.carsonmedia.com/projects/softballphotos/phototests/photocomparison.h tml
Can anyone explain the difference? Aperture seems to export a JPEG that resembles the original.
I'm perplexed at the difference.
--Brandon
15" MBP 2GB RAM OSX/XP Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Yeah, looks like a colorspace issue -- I'm guessing Pro Photo, but it might not be LR's fault. Last I checked, LR actually exports PSDs, not JPEGs, in Pro Photo space to PS. So 2 possibilities:
1. LR incorrectly tagged the PSD output, so PS doesn't realize it's Pro Photo.
2. You didn't do a colorspace coversion in PS before saving the JPEG. Try using 'save to web' in PS -- it usually takes care of the sRGB conversion for you. Does it look correct in PS before the JPEG export?

Lightroom 4.4 jpeg export watermark issue

Not sure abbout the older LR versions because I only tried this on LR 4.4.. After I edited my Raw images shot by Nikon D600, I'd like to export them to Jpeg format with my watermark. The watermark will not show if I exported the images in original size (6016 x 4016) as shot. However the watermark works fine if I resize the images to a smaller size, such as 1200 x 1024. Has anyone experienced the same issue? How can I work around it?

Irrespective of the rights/wrongs about exporting full resolution jpegs, the problem you describe sounds like the long-standing watermark bug. Basically there are certain circumstances whereby a text-based watermark will not show on the exported jpeg, and the factors that influence this are as follows:
The font being used for the watermark.....only certain fonts may be affected, e.g. Lucida Calligraphy is one. But even then the bug may not occur, as it also depends on:
a) The pixel dimensions specified for the output file. The larger the pixel size, the greater the risk that the bug will bite (as you have already discovered).
and/or
b) The proportional size as specified in the watermark editor....again the larger the size, the more likely the bug will bite.
So the workarounds are:
1) Try a different font.
2) Try reducing the pixel dimensions for the output file.
3) Or try reducing the specified proportional size.

Exported JPEG differs from Lightroom image

Hi all....
When I export my photos from lightroom as JPG, the colors of the photo are dramatically changed. (image looks much colder)
As first, I thought I may be a problem wiht the colour space, but I have try changing them without any success...
Any idea??
Thanks in advance...

Sorry that I didn't answer sooner. I must have missed this thread and your questions.
I haven't started calibrating my monitor yet (I've left it at sRGB for right now), but what I really want is for what I see in Lightroom to be the same as what I (and others) see on Flickr.
The only way to get other people to see close to the same thing as you see in Lightroom is to calibrate and profile your own monitor and export to sRGB. If you have a good monitor yourself, with a gamut close to sRGB, you will get very close correspondence between Lightroom and unmanaged browsers. If your monitor is one of the wide gamut deals or a crappy laptop with a very small gamut, your display in the unmanaged browser will always be completely wrong, even if you use sRGB. Nothing you can do about that. On such displays you basically have to use a managed browser. The Lightroom display will ALWAYS correspond to your browser if the browser is color managed and you correctly calibrated the screen. Color managed browsers include Safari, Firefox (with some problems) and development versions of Chrome.
because my monitors are set to sRGB
You don't want to do that. It is an OK test for a corrupt monitor profile, but it guarantees incorrect color. LR and your unmanaged browser might look the same, but they are both wrong. Calibrate and profile.
If I properly calibrate my monitor, the colors coming out of Lightroom when exporting to sRGB should still be the same as what I see while working in Lightroom, right, or am I better off with sRGB color profiles so that they're always exactly the same?
As I explain above, the colors when you calibrate and export to sRGB will look almost the same in unmanaged browsers except when you have a display with a gamut very different from sRGB. The problem is that under no realistic circumstance can a unmanaged browser show you correct color.

Lightroom 4 Export - EXIF data missing

I noticed that the EXIF data did not seem to be included in the jpeg file resulting from EXPORT.
I have double checked to make sure that under the METADATA section to select "ALL" and have both boxes (Remove Location Info & Write Keyword as Lightroom Hierarchy) unchecked.
Doing the same export in Lightroom 3 has no problem to include EXIF data in the JPEG file.
I am running the MAC version of the released Lightroom 4. Thank you in advance.

Hi Dorin, thank you for your reply. After reading your reply, I went back and checked my jpeg files carefully. You are correct that all the EXIF metadata are there.
My statement of 'missing' EXIF data was based on my EXIF data did not show up after I uploaded my JPG files to pBase, while all still worked well with Lightroom 3. Uploading the same set of jpeg files to other photo site like Picasa, the EXIF information is all there. Also, when I import those jpeg files in Lightroom 4, t=all the EXIF metadat are there too. It implies that it is a problem with pBase having probelm reading the EXIF of jpeg file from Lightrrom 4. Not sure what is the difference in Lightroom preparing the jpeg files, but I believe this 'missing EXIF' problem is site specific (i.e. pBase).
I will modfify the Topis to show pBase problem only if I can. Thank you.

RAW and Exported Jpegs in same catalog

I use lightroom to import raw files from my Nikon. Then i edit them and export the good ones to jpeg on my network share for viewing. When i import jpegs from my compact camera i import them directly to my network share. Before i always had the jpegs in to the same catalog just under the other path. But now with face recognitioning i get the face from both places with the exported ones. Is there a way to stack the jpeg with the raw file so that they only show once?

Raw and Jpeg next to each other can be treated as the same file, but only if they are in the same physical folder and have the same name.
Are your exported Jpeg files then re-imported into LR in a different folder? That's a problem for what you want to do (and in general I don't recommend reimporting duplicate images).
LR could do a great job of managing your network share using a published folder, if you included the Jpegs from your compact camera on the loca folder along with the raw images. With publish services and a published folder, LR will create (and remove) Jpeg images in a managed location you choose, and you don't need to worry about reimporting duplicates.
mh++

Exported JPEGs Distorted in Shadow Areas

I own a Nikon D7000 and I shoot 14bit RAW.
In Lightroom 3.3 the preview images were distorted, only in development mode the images were fine. I reported to Adobe on this and they seem to have fixed this issue.
In Lightroom 3.3 -- and still in 3.4 -- the exported JPEGs are distorted when the exported image is resized:
A lighter version of the same crop (for illustrative reasons):
As you can see, the gradient has serious artefacts, especially when going from green to black. It is a 90% JPEG quality exported of 1050px width. I have seen this for different image qualities (80-100%), though. This does not occur when the image is exported full size.
Can anybody confirm this?
It seems that this only happens for dark shadows.
I had a Canon G9 that I used with Lightroom and I have never seen a behaviour like this. Right now the export is useless to me.

I've had some discussions about this with Adobe folks during the LR 3 beta phase, but that is all behind a wall now. I think they did put in the dithering into Lightroom now. I still think it is your monitor profile. Also realize that the displays in laptops including the MacBook Pros are not actually full 8-bit displays and you will always see some banding in them. See for example this page: http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/gradient.php My guess is that that will show banding on your machine in the shadow areas. Also another issue is that you have to look at these displays at precisely the right angle because you will get raised shadows by quite a bit if you look at them just a few degrees off. One thing to do is to use a test image ( I use monitor_test_txt22.png from this page: http://www.normankoren.com/makingfineprints1A.html ). When you squint the image should be uniform. If not slant the display until it looks uniform.

How to keep Metadata on exported JPEGS?

I've being editing pictures in Lightroom for a while, but I have not being paying attention to the metadata issue until now. I need the metadata for Geotagging my pictures, but the problem I encounter is that after I edit them in Lightroom and export them as JPEGs none of the info that comes in the RAW files gets exported with them (like date and time pictures were taken, camera and lenses settings, etc).
These are the catalog settings I'm using:
When I try to sync my JPEG pictures with any GPS files they only detect the time and date the pictures where edited or modified and not the actual time and date the pictures were taken.
Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong?
Any help will be appreciated.

Thanks Bjorn, it was so simple. I just exported my last hiking trip and was able to show the GPS metadata in Everytrail.com.
Thank you again!!

Exporting jpegs-- why do I get 72ppi when i set resolution at 240ppi ?

Why does Lightroom export jpegs at 72ppi resolution-- when I clearly set it at 240ppi in the export window? It has done this for versions 1.0-1.2.
For exporting psd or tiff-- everything works as planned. Anyone have a solution?
Thanks.

Do not click on the minimize metadata checkbox. The resolution is meaningless anyway, but if you want the field uncheck that box.

Lightroom 5: Export jpeg Ordner Struktur

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for