Lightroom 5 Upgrade Issue

Hello,
This is very strange and I want to correctly describe my problem.
I want to Upgrade from LR 4 to LR 5.
I want to download the LR 5 upgrade NOT use the Cloud Service.
I have two computers, an XP and Windows 7.
Here is the strange part.
On my XP machine I have a link to download the LR 5 Upgrade.
When I send that link to my Windows 7 the webpage changes
and the only choice to purchase LR 5 upgrade on this webpage is to buy a monthly or yearly Cloud Service.
Adobe must know the operating system that my request to purchase is coming from?
Anyone have a link I can use to download LR 5 Upgrade?
Thanks,
Roger

http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5741

Similar Messages

Lightroom Upgrade at a client - sucess? - keyword problem deal breaker

Hi
Just a small report, on how upgrading a client's LR 2 catalog went.
Background: The client is a professional photographer specialized on garden photography. Her customers are gardening and lifestyle magazines who publish her photos regularly as illustrations to various articles. She has a professional Canon EOS 1Ds MK III equipment and shoots exclusively raw. In a shoot around 300 to 1000 images are shot. The Lightroom catalog has around 20,000 images currently.
In Lightroom she uses mostly DAM and some basic development features, images are delivered either as raw of as JPEG images to the clients. Keywording is especially important. She has an extensive hierarchical list of plants most of them multiword keywords with spaces, and lots of other keywords indicating if images were sent to clients and other stuff.
The upgrade went just very well. I exported the catalog to a new intermediate catalog without previews, installed LR3 and imported this intermediate catalog into LR3 generating new previews from scratch. The hardware is modest, and some functional tests (especially switching images in develop, spot tool, and adjustment brushes) revealed that everything performs well enough.
Then she asked me where she would have benefits from using the new version. And then I told the whole benefit story, which can be read everywhere.
- New process version, better details and noise reduction. She asked where she can see it? Hmm, I switched to 1:1 view changing the process versions, not really much to see on Canon 1Ds Mk III files. Even with noisier files, it was hard to tell, what has actually changed. So only a 4:1 view very tiny changes were visible. The impact on her business? Near to nothing as she does not print large. The differences would hardly be seen in the magazine prints.
- Lens corrections and perspective control: does not really matter in garden photography, but she could see some occasional usefullness.
- Publish services: no real need for it
- Print packages: nope
- Slightshow improvements: no use for it
- Performance improvements: nothing visible
- Effects: completely superfluous
- New import dialog: at first glance a hindereance, as she has to get used to it
Then she asked: did they correct the keyword handling, when entering keywords witrh spaces? (You know the nasty bug, where keyword completion is broken at keywords with spaces). We checked (I knew it wasn't fixed), and of course she was heavily disappointed. Thus, after 2 years of development nothing new for her, keyword bug not fixed? Of course she said, that I should tell her, when keyword completion works, then and only then would she consider an upgrade.
So, despite all the bells and whistles about the new version, I doubt that for many photographers the benefits are really so overwhelming in the real world. It is a pitty that Adobe continues to neglect the DAM features (some fresh ideas for client management would be great), that existing features aren't consequently implemented (esp. the possibilities to query the catalog, and keywording), and that existing bugs are constantly ignored and not fixed.
So, please Adobe, get keyword completion fixed for keywords with spaces immediately !!! This is what professionals need. A catalog without reliable DAM features, renders the catalog concept to a great extend useless. Please listen!
Disclaimer: As I am not a professional for me the situation is not the same. I just report my experience I had, with a photgrapher, who needs a proper asset management. I recommended Lightroom to her because of the overall package (she moved from Cumulus), so I feel a little obliged to help her in this issue. In my case, as a user of a modest Lumix G camera system, I would consider the IQ benefits more signifcant. I don't know, if this is a general observation.
Kind regards
Thomas

W.W. Webster wrote:
tgutgu wrote:
Just a small report, on how upgrading a client's LR 2 catalog went ...
So, please Adobe, get keyword completion fixed for keywords with spaces immediately !!! This is what professionals need. A catalog without reliable DAM features, renders the catalog concept to a great extend (sic) useless. Please listen!
I just report my experience I had, with a photgrapher (sic), who needs a (sic) proper asset management.
So the over-riding conclusion from your experience with just one photographer is that Lightroom is 'useless', and this compels you to demand, in bold type, that Adobe must listen?
That Lightroom has issues and areas for ongoing development is obvious, and Adobe won't dispute this. But rants like yours add nothing and are unhelpful. Julie's response is extremely tactful and far more moderate than your post deserves.
Dear Mr. Webster
I think when you post, you should definitely change your tone. Julie simply answered my original post by acknowledging the problem, your accusation that I did not use appropriate "netiquette" is ridiculous. Posts like yours are a real problem of this forum.
I simply gave a user story example to show that not for everybody the shiny advertised new features provide real benefits and that paying attention to a thorough implementation of features can be equally important. I think Julie has recognized this. And the issue is nothing for ongoing developments. Lightroom supports keywords with spaces, so it has to be done consequently. Keywording is essential for DAM. If keywording gets too tedious or leads to wrong keyword assignments, then DAM is really pointless.
The intention of my post was to point Adobe to an apparently small problem, which has quite a big impact to people, who depend on good DAM features. The issue is nothing new, existed since the first release of Lightroom, but nothing was done about it, unfortunately. Now that Lightroom addressed keywords with spaces even with a new preference setting, it was fair to assume, that they had done something about it with care. This isn't so obviously. The issue was discussed in previous threads, but did not get any visible notice from Adobe. I am glad that this has changed now with Julie's post.
In no way did I say that Lightroom is useless or even that I regard it to be so. I merely said that the catalog concept is to a great extend (not completely) useless, if its implementation is sloppy. DAM starts with data entry and only after doing this, you can use it to your benefit. Therefore it has to be efficient, which currently is not. Lightroom is criticized by a large number of users that it is forcing them into a catalog system instead of just providing access to the file system. Long existing bugs like this, likely proves them right in their view.
The competition (I mean complete workflow solutions) is not really better than Lightroom with respect to DAM features, however, my take is, that the developers should be equally ambitious with the quality of the catalog system as they are with IQ, especially if the achievements in IQ are apparently less relevant to owners of high end camera systems. (I could be wrong with the last statement, but it would be interesting to hear if others have similar observations).
Kind regards
Thomas
Thomas

Upgrade issues OBIEE 10g to 11g along with OBIA upgrade

Hi,
I have to upgrade OBIEE 10.1.3.4.1 to OBIEE 11.1.1.5 along with OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5(Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1) at my client location and I have very little knowledge on it. and want to know/have help documents for upgrade.
And if anyone in the forums involved in upgrade please list the errors/issues occured during upgrade and after upgrade.
1. OBIEE 10g to 11g upgrade issues??
2. OBIA OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5 upgrade issues along with 10g to 11g??
3. Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1 upgrade issues??
4. DAC upgrade issues??
any response for my questions is appreciated.
Thanks
Jay.
Edited by: Jay on Apr 11, 2012 9:11 AM

HI Jay,
We cannot explained thread list here, If you get any errors plz post me,will try to help out.
This is oracle document link - This document has given step by step with screen shots upgration for 10g to 11g ,Please refer the below link.
http://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/obe/fmw/bi/bi11115/upgrade/upgrade_to_11g.htm
http://obieemanu.blogspot.in/2011/05/rpd-upgration-from-10g-to-11g.html
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/upgrade.1111/e10125/ua_command_line.htm#ASMAS149
Award points it is useful.
Thanks,
satya

Report generation toolkit upgrade issues

I have created multiple vi's in that utilize the previous report generation toolkits specifically using the Generate Report Get Data to Modify.vi and the Generate Report Set Modified Data.vi. Obviously the report reference has now changed in 8.6's version of the report generation toolkit and these vi's do not exist in the 8.6 library anymore. What vi's do I need to replace these functions with to make this code work. Can anyone tell me what the work around is to solving this problem. This is a picture of the code.
BJD1613
Lead Test Tools Development Engineer
Philips Respironics
Certified LV Architect / Instructor
Attachments:
code.JPG ‏92 KB

Hi BJD1613,
The Report Generation VIs on the LabVIEW Palettes mutate properly. However, you may run into upgrade issues if VIs distributed with LabVIEW, but not available in the Palettes are used in the code. Hence, I would caution against using them for the same reason.
In this case, the specific references do exist in the report generation classes; however, since they are private, they cannot be accessed by VIs outside the respective classes. A temporary workaround for now is mentioned in the following KB 4OOCSJ4M Getting References in Report Generation Toolkit 1.1.3 with LabVIEW 8.6.
This was reported to R&D (CAR# 123064) for further investigation

EHP Upgrade Issue - Java Stack

Hi,
Our Source System at NW 7.0 SP13 and we are upgrading the system to EHP1 SP03.
Upgrade failed at Downtime > DEPLOY_ONLINE_DEPL phase.
Error log:
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:                       com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.doExecute(AbstractPhaseType.java:863) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Exception has occurred during the execution of the phase.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:             com.sap.sdt.jspm.unattended.RequestController.addContextInfo(RequestController.java:178) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Deployment of queue sapjup-queue completed with error
JSPM version is 7.01.3.0.15. Current JSPM log directory is /usr/sap/XPD/JC00/j2ee/JSPM/log/log_2009_09_09_16_09_42.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.sapjup.tools.sapjupjspm.SAPJupJSPMRapiAdapter.createAndLogRapiException(SAPJupJSPMRapiAdapter.java:698) [Thread[main,5,main]]: The deployment of the queue failed.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.sapjup.tools.sapjupjspm.deploy.SAPJupJSPMDeployer.deployList(SAPJupJSPMDeployer.java:68) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Could not execute deployment of stack file /usr/sap/trans/EPS/in/XPD.xml.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:      com.sap.sdt.j2ee.phases.PhaseTypeDeploymentManager.execute(PhaseTypeDeploymentManager.java:519) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Error while executing DeploymentManager phase with action deploySlot. Check the log files for the specified action.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:906) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase UPGRADE/DEPLOYMENT_BASED_UPGRADE/DEPLOY_ONLINE_DEPL has been completed.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:907) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Start time: 2009/09/09 22:09:42.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:909) [Thread[main,5,main]]: End time: 2009/09/09 22:11:51.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:910) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Duration: 0:02:08.248.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:911) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase status is error.
I went through the following link , proceeded with option 2, But still getting same error.
Portal Upgrade Issue
Please advise the resolution for the issue I have.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Srinivas
Edited by: Srinivas Dasari on Sep 10, 2009 5:48 AM
Edited by: Srinivas Dasari on Sep 10, 2009 5:48 AM

Issue resolved

Upgrade issues list needed

Hi,
We're currently on 4.6b and going to upgrade to ECC6 with unicode I'm trying to compile a list point taken care converting to unicode from ABAP technical point of view. Does anyone have such a list?
Some points i shortlisted are :
1) Use GUI_UPLOAD and GUI_DOWNLOAD rather than WS_UPLOAD and WS_DOWNLOAD.
2) Structures or table headers that contain non-character data need to be identical when moving, comparing, selecting into, updating from, etc.
3) OPEN DATASET filename IN TEXT MODE FOR INPUT ENCODING DEFAULT.
I know there are others. Any help would be appreciated.
aRs

Check the below links
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=268386&highlight=upgrade+issues
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=263434&highlight=upgrade+issues
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=261051&highlight=upgrade+issues
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=253316&highlight=upgrade+issues

Errors in Forte 3.5 -Upgrade issue

hello ,
We are having a frequent disruption in the communication SO which has an
externalConnection Class. Did anything change in 3.5? We did not have
these errors in 3L!
After these erros, we have a mutex locking problem which leaves our
application hanging.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
thanks
suma
Here is an Excerpt of the log file
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 194 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
24-May-2001 09:16:47: VH.G.G..GUIT/GUI0/PLAXRC172.23.4.401/../..;PGYX;
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 233 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
regards,
Suma Venkatesh

-----Original Message-----
From: Venkatesh, Suma
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:39 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Errors in Forte 3.5 -Upgrade issue
hello ,
We are having a frequent disruption in the communication SO which has an
externalConnection Class. Did anything change in 3.5? We did not have
these errors in 3L!
After these erros, we have a mutex locking problem which leaves our
application hanging.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
thanks
suma
Here is an Excerpt of the log file
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 194 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment
laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
24-May-2001 09:16:47: VH.G.G..GUIT/GUI0/PLAXRC172.23.4.401/../..;PGYX;
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 233 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment
laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
regards,
Suma Venkatesh

R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login using forms:Please help****urgent

We have recently upgraded our instance from 11.5.9 to 12.0.4 in Windows 2003 server.
We are unable to login to forms after upgrade, however we are able access self service responsibilities without any issues.
We are getting APP-FND-01496 when we access any forms responsibility. We have tried all possible metalink notes with no luck.
Any help to resolve this issue will be appreciated.

Duplicate thread ...
R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login to forms**please help
Re: R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login to forms**please help

ECC 6.0 EHP-4 upgrade Issue in phase MAIN SHDRUN/ALTNTAB FILL were negative

Hi Basis Expert,
while doing ECC 6.0 EHP-4 Upgrade in MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL phase we are getting the following issue please help us.
Checks after phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL were negative!
Last error code set: BATCH JOB RDDNT2MT FAILED: Error(s) found in the log(s), accumulated in "ALTNTFI.ELG".
We check the shadow instance is up and we can log in to the system. Check ST22 and SM21 notice no error.
Check the JOB RDDNT2MT (SM37) successfully running and all the job finish without any error.
Hope anybody can share a bit your experience on this issue. we try search the note and find the forum but no luck.
Thanks

Hi,
> 2EETG011 "No shadow system""(environment parameter)""auth_shadow_upgrade"
> 2EETG011 "No shadow system""DB-connect not against shadow tables !"
>
It looks from your log that shadow system is not able to connect to database. Please check your shadow system. Check below link as well:
http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-basis/ecc-6-upgrade-issue-in-phase-altntab_fill-1556272
Thanks
Sunny
Edited by: Sunny Pahuja on Oct 15, 2010 1:27 PM

Can I buy a Lightroom upgrade (from LR3) with a perpetual licence and a student discount? If so, which page do I need? Thanks.

I am trying to buy a Lightroom upgrade (from LR3) with a perpetual licence and with a student discount.
If I go the student discount route on the web U get taken to the 'cloud' options which I don't want.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
PS Is the upgrade worth it in any case??

I believe there are NO upgrades for Student and Teacher editions but you can see here: Products
If the price is the same as an ordinary upgrade you are probably better off buying that because it can be upgraded in the future.

Lightroom upgrade will not load when it is opened.

When I load Lightroom upgrade to 4.0 and try to open the upgrade it hangs during loading of the catalog. I have uninstalled and reinstalled several times and the upgrade does not work. I'm running Win 7 64 bit.

It sounds like the software equivalent of a heart attack in old age! My prescription would be LR 5.7 used daily.
Bob Frost

Upgrade issues list

Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone had a list of Upgrade issues (most likely, from ticketting system) to the 5.0 system.
Thanks

Hi mark,
Can u please send me the upgrade issue list to this email address
[email protected]

Why do I get Error: 404 when I try to download a Lightroom upgrade on the UK site?

Why do I get Error: 404 when I try to download a Lightroom upgrade on the UK site?

Try downloading from below link :
New Adobe Lightroom 6 (CC) Direct Download Links – Free Trials | ProDesignTools
Feel free to post , if you need further assistance

I purchased a Lightroom upgrade (4 to 6) four hours ago and can still not download it; purchase order not recognized

I purchased a Lightroom upgrade (4 to 6) four hours ago and can still not download it

Hi there
Occasionally orders are reviewed manually during US business hours. We would expect your order to be released within 8 hours.
Sorry for any inconvenience caused.
Kind regards
Bev

IDSM-2 - upgrade issue - 5.x to 6.x

Hello All,
I have an issue upgrading the IDSM-2 module I'm playing with.
It is currently running version 5.0(2).
The thing is when I try to upgrade the image to the latest 6.x version using the .bin.gz file, I get the follwing error message :
The filename IPS-IDSM2-K9-sys-1.1-a-6.1-2-E3.bin.gz is not a valid upgrade file type.
Continue with upgrade? []:
There is no image file that is not .bin.gz on the download section of the website. Only recovery images have the .pkg extension.
Does anybody how to troubleshoot this simple(I guess) upgrade issue?
Regards,
Thibault.

You are trying to "upgrade" using a "System Image" (-sys-) file instead of an Upgrade file.
The upgrade file for the IDSM-2 is the standard upgrade file used across almost all IPS/IDS models:
IPS-K9-6.1-2-E3.pkg
It can be downloaded here:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/ips6

Frustrating Phone Upgrade issue

We need help with phone upgrade issue we encounter when BestBuy associate process our upgrade. Associate is saying we are not eligible but we have not done any phone upgrade since Jan 2011. Our ATT mobile service was established with BB in 2009 and we only upgraded 2 phones in Jan 2011 thru BB. The only recent change in January 2013 was a change of responsibility between my spouse and me since my company has a better employer discount thru ATT. No change and per ATT, no contract and we should be able to upgrade in any retail store. But BB keeps telling us we have issue with ATT and can do our upgrade only with ATT Corporate Store. Our mobile account is a regular family plan account as originally established with BB and just like any BB customer, have employer's discount attached. I don't understand how BB system communicates with ATT system so it is hard for me to explain to ATT what "error message" BB associate is receiving. It has become so frustrating with BestBuy telling us to check with ATT and then for ATT to tell us that there is no issue at their end. We have been a loyal BB customer with all major appliances bought from them including protection plan. The least they can do is work with their ATT representative to figure out between themselves what the issue is. Here we are willing to give both companies our business with new phones and new contracts and no one can help us out.

LTGee -
I am very sorry to hear about this. I am going to send you a Private Message to collect some information from you to see if we can get to the bottom of this. To check your private messages, ensure you are logged into the forum and click on the envelope on the upper right hand side of the forum.
Thanks!
Jesus|Senior Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

Lightroom 5 Upgrade Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for