Lightroom 6 / CC2015 - Facial Recognition Terribly Slow, not using all of CPU or GPU, still keeps going when paused.

This is actually a couple of issue but wondering if others are experiencing it and worked through it.
I am using a Dual Xeon CPU 3.2 ghz Mac Pro, Catalog on SSD, Images files on Mirrored Pair, Dedicated GPU (max I can install in my version of Mac Pro) and hardware acceleration enabled in Lightroom.
I watched the Lightroom 6 Facial Recognition tutorial which leaves out a lot of the bulk editing and says basically let it loose on your whole catalog.. NOT recommended.
I started out with a couple small portrait galleries that identified a couple hundred total people to seed facial recognition so it didn't suggest everyone is the first person I confirmed (which it will do otherwise). I have also optimized my catalog multiple times.
I have encountered the following serious performance issues and bugs with Facial Recognition.:
Lightroom Facial Recognition goes to a ridiculous crawl after about 2000 images to be confirmed. (i.e. 2000-2300 in a couple hours, 800-1200 in the next 12 hours)
Lightroom becomes largely unresponsive after having a fair number of images to be confirmed, even after pausing Address and Facial Recognition. So even selecting 4 rows of images can take 5 minutes with several long pauses.
Once I select and click confirm it takes up to 2 minutes to update the "to be confirmed" list again.
When I click on an individual at the top of the page, pause facial recognition and address lookup it still continues to "Look for similar faces" [BUG!!!!!!!!] even though all I want to do is just confirm some individuals more quickly in bulk with the images already identified.. not continue to look for more as a work around for the painfully slow responsiveness of the module.
The odd part is that with all of the performance issues Lightroom will not use more than 20-30% of my two Xeon CPUs, barely touches my GPU (<10% CPU, 30% memory), my and no more than 35% of my memory. Computer Temps are also barely above startup temperatures and 15-25 degrees cooler than when I run other applications which will consume my entire CPU and memory if I let it. I have explored Lightroom's settings but seen nothing further I can configure to speed it all up.  I have also attempted the operation on images on the SSD, my drobo (known to be slow), an independent fast disk I have, and a pair of raided disks and have the same issues.
I will also note that all of my other applications seem to continue to operate just fine.. the slowness seems to be contained to the Lightroom application itself.
Lightroom version: 6.0 [1014445]
Operating system: Mac OS 10 Version: 10.10 [3]
Application architecture: x64
Logical processor count: 8
Processor speed: 3.2 GHz
Built-in memory: 18,432.0 MB
Real memory available to Lightroom: 18,432.0 MB
Real memory used by Lightroom: 5,537.5 MB (30.0%)
Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 32,240.6 MB
Memory cache size: 4,342.0 MB
Maximum thread count used by Camera Raw: 8
Camera Raw SIMD optimization: SSE2
Displays: 1) 2048x1152
Graphics Processor Info:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 OpenGL Engine
Check OpenGL support: Passed
Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
Version: 3.3 NVIDIA-10.0.31 310.90.10.05b12
Renderer: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 OpenGL Engine
LanguageVersion: 3.30
Application folder: /Applications/Adobe Lightroom
Library Path: /Users/DryClean/Documents/Lightroom_Catalog/MyCat_LR6.lrcat
Settings Folder: /Users/DryClean/Library/Application Support/Adobe/Lightroom
Anyone have any suggestions?

A big problem continues to be that once you wait for it to index all your faces you find it missed over half of them. There are many cases where it missed the subject of the photo but managed to find a tiny waiter off in the shadows. I don't know how this will ever get fixed; it seems it'll require an update that lets you rerun the indexing a few times, maybe with different levels of granularity. I doubt that's coming.
It stands to reason that a system that hands you thousands of false positives for every face can't recognize if something is or isn't a face in over half the cases. Faces in profile or tilted down, especially with the eyes looking down, are bypassed completely. I have directories with a thousand people shots in them, many with multiple people, and instead of LR6 returning an index of 1.5k or so, it gives me 385. I'm not sure how valuable the search advantages will be in this case; I can see it not returning some favorite shots of people.
Anyway, for anyone looking to get past the spinning wheels, work on one directory at a time. Then once a directory is done, keep it selected so you have the same thumbnails of identified faces in the confirmed area, and control-select the next directory. You won't have to reseed the confirmed faces area this way and things move much faster when you're not working with the entire library. It also helps to click each person in the confirmed faces and work in that view sometimes. It'll return faces of family members of that person and you can rename those. You can watch it focus its top results as you confirm but, annoyingly, it doesn't narrow the total suggestions but actually expands them the more faces you confirm and the fewer correct positives remain. (This seems opposite to how it should work. It should give you fewer faces the more you confirm as it gets a better idea what the person looks like and has fewer shots left unconfirmed of that person.)  Yet, even with the expanded results, faces will still escape it and pop up in other people's results as false positives.
Bottom line: It's only a little better than manual tagging, and not as thorough because of the poor hit rate of the initial indexing. But it works better if you stick to isolated directories and occasionally individual people. At least that way you don't have to wait for it to re-sort tens of thousands of results with every click.

Similar Messages

  • HELP: Premiere Pro CC not using all CPU and RAM during rendering and export

    Hello,
    I am using Premiere Pro CC on a Windows 7. My timeline is quite simple with two videos, one with the movie (mpeg) and the other with the subtitles (avi).
    When I render the sequence in PP or export, the rendering time is way too slow and it only uses around 15-20% of the CPU and 3 GB of RAM.
    My hardware config is :
    - CPU : i7-4770k 3.50Ghz
    - RAM : 8 GB
    - Disk : 2 x 3 TB SATA (no raid)
    RAM is not the bottleneck, neither the disk access.
    I have tried rendering and exporting the same project on an iMac (with an i5 2.7 Ghz and 4 GB RAM and only 1 disk) and the result is 4x faster !!!
    The CPU usage is close to 100% as well as RAM usage.
    So how come PP uses all resources availble on an iMac and not on a Windows 7 ?
    Is there any known bug or software bottleneck on Windows 7 ?
    My machine is brand new and nothing much installed besides Adobe products.
    Any help is very much appreciated.
    Thanks,

    I just rendered out a a 2 minute sequence with about 100 clips in it and Colorista effects on everything to the Vimeo 1080 H264 preset. It took about 5 minutes to render straight from Premiere, it used all the recourses it could, my CPU was running at near %100, same with my ram and GPU, I was happy.
    Then I did another render with Red Giant Denoiser and it now wants to take 30 mins and it is only using about %20 of the recourses available. My problem isn't that its taking longer with Denoiser but that its not using all of my computers CPU and GPU.
    Im rendering at maximum render quality and bit dept to H264 (Im happy to wait the extra time), if I try to use VRB 2 it encodes 1 pass at a time and wants to take up to 40 minutes.
    I would appreciate some advice on this.
    Premiere Pro CC 2013
    2.6 GHz Intel Core i7
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M 2048 MB (CUDA GPU enabled in Premiere)
    16 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
    OS X 10.9.4 (13E28)

  • Why can't I make Lightroom use all the CPU-Power (all cores) available for generating Previews?

    Dear Lightroom Team,
    I've been a Lightroom user since the very first Beta, and I am truly happy with the work you deliver. It changed my way of editing forever, and you guys keep improving it.
    Yet there is that one question that bothers me, and that i'm looking for an answer for.
    My Workflow has the generate Previews checkbox checked by standard. I usually import between 150 and 2000 photos at once, on occaions it can be up to 5000 photos. Generating Previews always takes a significant amount of time, and Lightroom is only using 25% of my CPU Power while doing so. (using a MacBook Pro 8,2)
    I understand the concept, that only using 25% CPU enables me to use the computer while waiting for the Previews. But most of the time I just grab myself a cup of coffee, do the dishes or other stuff, while waiting for the Previews. Usually I rund out of things to do, because it takes ages to Process all the photos. So I would really love to make Lightroom use ALL the cpu power possible.
    I'm sure you guys have spent a lot of thoughts while coding this and have a very good answer handy. Looking forward reading it!
    all the best,
    Wolfgang

    Wolfgang Lienbacher wrote:
    I was actually hoping to get an official reply from adobe ...
    This is prmarily a user-to-user forum. The Adobe staff monitored site is here:
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family
    On my four-year old Windows 7 i7-860 system LR4.4.1 takes ~0.5 sec. per Canon 5D MKII 21Mp raw image to render 'Standard-Sized' previews with LR Catalog Settings 'Standard Preview Size' set to '2048' pixels. I consider that pretty fast!
    I usually build 1:1 full-size previews on import, which takes ~5.0 sec. per image. Processor utilization varies between 15-50% for Standard-Sized previews and 15-65% for 1:1 previews. I consider this pretty slow, but it doesn't stop me from working on the images inside LR's Library and Develop modules.
    I wait until 'Copy and import photos' has completed and can see Preview Building has started. LR doesn't slow-down much even with the 1:1 preview building going on in the background. Have you tried working in LR during the preview building (i.e. sorting,  rating, keywording, and Develop adjustments)?

  • Mac PP CS5 not using all CPU anymore

    All,
    I was a cutting a project a while back and put it to the side for a while. I just went back to it and asked Prem to render the work are and was surprised to see it taking forever. I opened the CPU perf view and found hardly any CPU being used. I have a MacPro 2.9GHz 12 core machine with 48M memory and the project drive is a striped set of WD Caviar Blacks. Not only is the machine not breaking a sweat its not even getting out of bed.
    Yes I have installed Apple patches since then and some software. PPCS5 is up to date. We I was using the machine a while back it was firing on all threads and cores.
    Has anyone seen this before?
    Jim

    Hi Bill,
    Thanks for your email. Yes I did try PPBM5 with some success. Separate to this I decided to let the render run from end to end on my project to see what would happen. So what I saw:
    - first 600 odd frames very quick (very = blindingly)
    - then it got to 900 odd frames very quick but then came back to the 600th odd frame where each frame took minutes to render for about 60 frames.
    - all this time the machine didnt break a sweat,(basically flatline).
    - after the slow 60 frames all the processors came to life and for the rest of the render (thousands of frames and multiple sequences) and it was rendering normally
    Im trying to figure out what those 60 frames were, as I cant see anything overly complex there that would mean PPCS5 would fail to use all the CPU available (if anything 1 core jumped up every now and then).
    Thanks

  • TS1368 I want to delete a lot of things childrens stories, albums which are not used which that are on my ipad. However when I go through Itunes it wont show me most of the stuff in my library. it takes ages to delete one at a time.

    I want to delete a lot of things childrens stories, albums which are not used which that are on my ipad. However when I go through Itunes it wont show me most of the stuff in my library. it takes ages to delete one at a time.
    Can you help please?

    Thanks King_Penguin for taking time to read and reply. 
    I just purchased this movie on Thursday, May 15, so just a few days ago.  I have never had any trouble whatsoever since I have been in Vietnam.  I have downloaded several movies and even music and they have all synced to my respected Apple products except for this purchase. 
    Sorry, I don't quite understand what you mean by studios and different versions.  Could you please explain? 
    I checked my purchased list in my purchase history under my account and there are no hidden items. 

  • Can not use all the tools in my drawing markups any ideas on getting them to work?

    Can not use all the tools in my drawing markups any ideas on getting them to work?

    Hi tonys60181,
    Could you please let me know what version of Adobe Acrobat are you using.
    What all drawing tools are you unable to access?
    Is this issue specific to one PDF file or all?
    What exactly happens when you try to use any drawing markup?
    Please let me know.
    Regards,
    Anubha

  • Hello, i have updated my iphone 5 black 16 gb to ios 7 ios 7.0.2 (11a501) and my battery has become worse it gives 9 hours of usage with out doing anything, i have done everything i tried, not using my iphone as well but still no change at all!

    hello, i have updated my iphone 5 black 16 gb to ios 7.0.2 (11a501) and my battery life of my iphone has become worse it gives 9 hours of usage with out doing anything, i have done everything every tip that is available online i had 3gs and 4s so i know how to save battry life,i even tried  not using my iphone as well but still no change at all!. i have upadted to ios 7.0.3 then downgraded it , i thought battery may be an issue ,so i put  brand new battery still no change , so what should i do ? , update to the latest version which is ios 7.0.4 or wait for the ios 7.1 , i was using iphone 4s running on ios 6.1 it gave me 3 days of battery timing , iphone 5 seemed to be very bad for me ,help ! ?
    its facory unlocked btw

    Try to do a reset, if it doesn't work try remove recently added apps this may solve your problem ( like google app because it has happened with me)
    Take a look at apps using your location service in privacy, it can cause battery draining.

  • Premiere Pro CC not using all resources... 4k

    I just put together a new workstation machine for editing 1D-C 4k files in Premiere Pro and After Effects.
    Specs...
    i7 3770     3.4
    Gigabyte Z77 Mobo
    32gb Corsair Vengance DDR3 1600 RAM
    250gb Samsung SSD
    4x 2TB Seagate 7200 HDDs in RAID 0 (Yes I know it isn't backed up, we have that part covered)
    Nvidia Quadro K4000 (3gb vram)
    Anyway, we transfered a project with all the media files to our RAID media drive.
    It opened up very quickly and loaded all the media much faster then our old workstation.
    Then I hit the spacebar (perview) and the problems started..
    It won't play back smoothly at all,
    AND it is only running the CPU at 10-20%, GPU 10-50%, ram at 25% and it is not really taxing the drives very hard either...
    Why won't PP use all the resources at 100% like I have previously seen it do on other machines?
    ** The project we are trying to play is 2 layers of 4k .MOV footage in a 1080 timeline... with sharpening, Fast color corrector, and RGB curves.
    ** It also drops every fourth frame when playing back just one layer of 4k .mov footage in a 1080 timeline with NO Effects applied. (Much smoother, but still not using all resources)
    What I am asking, is why would it be giving up so quickly? Before even taxing the resources very hard?

    I too have a recent 1D-C project I'm editing.  That 1D-C is something, yes?  Most filmic images I've ever seen from a DSLR.  But I digress. 
    I'm following a workflow closer to the one used by Philip Bloom and Shane Hurlbut.  The Motion Jpeg files will not play well at all on your system.  It's strictly a capture medium - not an editing one.
    I converted all my 1D-C files to Prores 422 at 4K size using Mpeg Streamclip.  Those files imported beautifully and edit well on my Retina Macbook Pro laptop.  I usually set playback to 1/2 quality, ps. 
    I have had problems using CUDA, so I'm sticking to software mode.  But I don't see any problem with being able to cut my film and finish on my computer.
    Also - my sequence is a 4K sequence right in Premiere.  I simply chose a clip and "made a sequence" from that.  Why scale when I don't have to?  I've exported to 1080p easily from the sequence. 
    If anyone finds this workflow less than ideal, I'm all ears.  Thanks. 

  • SAP job not using all dialog processes that are available for parallel processing

    He Experts,
    The customer is running a job which is not using all the dialog processes that are available for parallel processing. It appears to use up the parallel processes (60) for the first 4-5 minutes of the job and then maxes out about 3-5 processes for the remainder of the job.
    How do I analyze the job to find out the issue from a Basis perspective?
    Thanks,
    Zahra

    Hi Daniel,
    Thanks for replying!
    I don't believe its a standard job.
    I was thinking of starting a trace using ST05 before the job. What do you think?
    Thanks,
    Zahra

  • MBP not using all memory while rendering video

    Hey,
    When I do rendering in Adobe Premiere Por CS6, my Mac is not using all the available RAM: 2773 MB used....5416 MB free
    Memory Pages:
                                  1658 MB active....1099 MB wired
                                  5420 MB inactive....11.2 MB free
    it also says that:       3 swap files at peak usage
                                   256 MB total swap space (20 MB used)  
    350 GB free storage space( total 750 GB)
    I have a MBP (OS x Lion) late 2011 with i7 2.8 GHz and 8 GB RAM
    Adobe Premiere Pro is set to use 6.5 GB of RAM but not even while working in the programme it has ever used that much of memory.
    During rendering, it is the only app running, except for Google Chrome.
    If this info is not enough, just ask what do you need to know...
    PLEASE HELP, rendering takes forever.
    Thanks,
      kund

    You never said what model Mac you have. Since this is the MacBook Pro forum, I assume you have some version of the MBP. 390% CPU would indicate CPU-boundedness for a quad-core CPU without active hyperthreading, or a dual-core CPU with hyperthreading active.
    Given the high CPU usage and the low swap usage, it seems unlikely that memory usage is the problem, but I'm not a Premiere Pro user, so I couldn't guess what it.
    You might try posting your question in an Adobe forum for Premiere Pro.

  • System not using all avail. mem.

    Hi all, did a lot of forum searching and haven't seen this topic.
    I'm using PPCS5(in production Premium) While rendering, the program is not using all available memory. before I go on here is the system I am using:
    Win7pro
    EVGA X58FTW mobo
    I7 970
    6x4gig Kingston hyperX 1600 RAM
    Quadro fx4000
    WD 140gig Raptor sys. drive
    2x1TB RAID 0 (3gig SATA) data
    2x2TB RAID 0 (6gig SATA) data
    see image:
    I have 21gigs allocated to the program.
    Is the bottleneck the cache memory?
    This is what I'm outputting:
    Thanks for looking.

    Bob Sackter wrote:
    I am encoding H.264 640x360
    Source is 1920x1080p60 HDV 8 sources,  With a timecode window
    bitrate set at 2.0 1 pass VBR
    I'm making a multicam reference.
    There is a little contradiction in the information here, HDV is 1440 x 1080 i60 or possible p30 I do not know of any camera that is 60p

  • I just got the first get and im trying to download the ios onto it and it will just stop and not load anymore how do i make it keep going?

    i just got the first get and im trying to download the ios onto it and it will just stop and not load anymore how do i make it keep going?

    You are only as young as you feel......
    This is an example of how you can select the exact content that you want to sync to your device. You do not have to sync the entire iTunes library. You can pick and choose the music, apps, books and so on that you want to sync. This is using music as an example.
    Connect the iPad to the PC and launch iTunes.
    Click on the iPad name on the left side under devices.
    Click on the Music Tab on the right.
    Click on only the albums or playlists that you want to sync.
    Click on the Sync Music Heading.
    Click on Apply in the lower right corner of iTunes
    You can do this with apps, books, movies .... Whatever .... You have the freedom to sync whatever you want.

  • My iPhone 4s notified me that I had to manage my storage  so I deleted  apps that used a lot of space I deleted almost all my picture and it still keeps telling me  I don't have enough storage  is there any other way I can make room on my phone ?

    My iPhone 4s notified me that I had to manage my storage  so I deleted  apps that used a lot of space I deleted almost all my picture and it still keeps telling me  I don't have enough storage  is there any other way I can make room on my phone ?  Were it shows how much storage  I have available it still says 9.9 even after all that I have done so I don't know if I need to change my storage plan or what but anything will help I guess

    Check for 'others' in iTunes against your iPhone.
    Restore from a previous backup to reclaim some of it.
    Still want more, Restore in iTunes, setup as New.

  • Syslogd process uses all available cpu & console app won't run.

    I have a Mac Mini (G4 power PC) running 10.5.5. Just recently after several minutes the system never wakes. It just shows the SBBOD. All I can do is hold down the power button and reboot. When the system reboots, using the activity monitor, I see that the process named syslogd uses all available cpu. I can still do things, but the cpu is saturated.
    I took a snapshot of the syslogd process, and I can post it here if anyone thinks it might help.
    If I activate the console application, the window comes up then hangs with the SBBOD.
    The syslogd process uses all available cpu right after reboot, and does so regardless of which user (including root) is logged in. Attempting to kill the syslogd process with the activity monitor does nothing

    Thanks! It took a long time for the disk utility to fix the permissions, but as soon as it did, the logger process calmed down. Looking at the log file now, I see it was my McAfee virus scan causing the logger to flip-out.
    I'm now looking for a new MAC anti-virus program.

  • Lightroom 2.4 Is Too Slow To Use As A Professional Product

    Hello -
    I would like to know how to get Lightroom to respond in less than 4-8 seconds for almost any task.
    From returning to Grid mode (4.5 seconds) to adjusting a routine crop and angle (5-7 seconds per move, 60-90 seconds total) to simply shift-selecting three to fifty photos (4-9 seconds) no matter what I do in Lightroom, it is worse that Photoshop 1.0 on a Mac Plus. Really.
    Returning to Lightroom from another app - 7 seconds.
    Getting the menus to drop down - 4 seconds.
    My lightroom settings:
    standard preview size: 1680
    Quality: High
    Discard 1:1: Never
    write changes to XMP: off
    Catalog: 127 mb on F drive (24 gig free)
    Catalog: 13.5k photos, 95 gig on F drive
    Cache: 6 gig on F drive
    NVIDIA settings: performance over quality
    My computer:
    HP 8730 elitebook
    4 gig ram
    XP Pro, SP2
    Proc: Core 2 Duo T9400, 2666 MHz (10 x 267)
    DirectX    4.09.00.0904 (DirectX 9.0c)
    Chipset: Cantiga PM45
    Video: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M  (1024 MB)
    (2x) 250 gig 7200 rmp HD
    Before anyone says to export to a new catalog and re-import, etc, use a smaller catalog, etc, be advised that I have done all of that. I have imported only 250 images to a new catalog, on a newly installed OS, with Lightroom as the ONLY application. Still it acts this sluggish.
    I have scoured the boards for solutions, and having tried all the varied fixes to no avail, I really quite strongly feel that a person should not EVER be in the position or running some of the most powerful available hardware and STILL have to wait interminable seconds for Lightroom to respond.
    This software, as it stands now on the PC platform (unless I am missing something quite obvous) is absolutely unusable in its present state.
    Can someone from Adobe or a board guru please respond in kind to my request for help?

    Photo_op8 wrote:
    BradKaye wrote:
    I'd have to agree with the subject of this 100%, even though I'm not experiencing anywhere near the levels of lag ellsworth is on any of my primary workhorses.
    1st-Gen 17" MacBook Pro 2.4Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo with Hi-Rez Screen (about 2 years old)
    1st-Gen MacPro (Dual Twin-Core 3Ghz, 3x, 10k-RPM 150GB Raptor RAID-0, partitioned to System/Scratch/Files (in that order) 16GB RAM...blah blah (about 2.2 years old)
    3 week old MacPro  2x2.66 Quad-Core MacPro, 16GB RAM, Multiple Partitioned (System/Scratch/Files)  Internal 4x-1.5TB RAID-0, 4x 1.5TB eSATA RAID-0, 2x NVIDIA GT 120's, 30" NEC 3090WQXi, 26" LaCie 526, 24" Apple LED Display
    OS 10.5.8 on all machines.
    Let me repeat-
    Partitioning ONE drive to contain system files, application, cache, catalog and photos=SLOW.
    It really doesn't matter that the drive is 7200 or 10k rpm if ALL items reside on the same drive. The MacPro has four bays. One drive for system and catalog, second for cache, third for photos=FAST.
    Wow, I'm glad you repeated that, and used capitalized text so that I would be sure to understand.
    Clearly, the benchmarks I have off of the various evolutions of my last 3, $10k computers must be in error. (single system disk, RAID-0 system disk, 10k RPM system disk, RAID-0 3x -10K rpm system disks, multiple scratch volumes on different drives, singular scratch volumes on RAIDed drives, tested via benchmark programs and application specific batch tests, etc.etc.)
    More importantly as an issue of forum protocol, you didn't actually read my post.
    Brad Kaye wrote:
    I partition about 10% of the outside of a drive as separate and put the information I need to get to most quickly which tends to be the system folder then scratch disk in a another separate partition and then I leave the rest on that drive as gobs of 'B' space for media and other crap files, reserving the first 10%-30% of the outside of a different drive (or RAID-0 sets) for my files and Lightroom catalogs.
    I'm throwing 370 mb/sec between two individual sets of 4 drive RAID-0 sets.  Single 7200rpm drives sling about 80 mb/sec.  My drive arrangement isn't the reason Lightroom IS TOO SLOW TO USE AS A PROFESSIONAL PRODUCT.
    Also, since I referenced and linked the former software engineer turned photo FREAK in my post, whose blog I started reading last year corroborating the decisions I've made in my previous system setups with immaculate documentation and testing procedure your response even more seems like the entire reason I rarely bother posting in community forums.  You seem to be here to spout, not to contribute and learn.
    Take a look at all of the info contained here: (I've already read it, all of it, and more)
    Diglloyd Mac Performance Guide
    and if you still think I'm wrong, lets have an informed debate about it.  Really.
    Otherwise, lets please keep this topic moving forward with the issues Adobe needs to address next to make Lightroom a better product for professional photographers, and specifically, help out ellsworth999 who started this topic, who seems to have a big helping of problems on his plate. I can't speak to him directly of his problems since I'm not using the Windows version of the software.

Maybe you are looking for

  • [Not really solved] Video with Pidgin is not working

    Hi, I would like to use video chat with Pidgin, but it doesn't work on my computer. I have a webcam (:D), and it seems that it is correctly recognized because ` vlc v4l2:// ' shows me my face. I'm using XMPP (with a GMail account, but this shouldn't

  • Can't open Finder after Upgrade to Yosemite 10.10

    After the Upgrade to Yosemite 10.10 on my MacBook Pro with Retina Display i can't open the Finder and it says it's not reacting. The bar on top when i'm at the Desktop is also gone. Can somebody help me ?

  • Ipad 2 Print button does not work after 6 upgrade?

    Since we upgraded to iOS6, our print button does not work and does not find our printer.  It was working fine until iOS6.  Called an Apple Technician and he had me reset, which wiped out all of my saved information but didn't fix the print.  He then

  • Where has my new stylesheet gone?

    I just created a new stylesheet. All fine. Then I wanted to edit it so I did Format/Styles but when I pull down the 'Available in' list, my new stylesheet isn't there. So I go to the Project tab and look under the Stylesheets folder but it's not ther

  • Line Graph - 0 quantity display

    All, The requirements for my line graph are as follows: -Map the data to the graph based on hours and quantity.  -When the quantity is 0 - break the line.   The line should not dip down to 0 and back up to the quantity.   The line should stop at that