Lightroom Export Loosing Sharpness.

Hi, I would like to get to the bottom of this Lightroom issue.
Left is Lightroom, the right is 20k mb JPG export.
I have 30mb Raw/Nef images from my Nikon d7100.
Aftter editing in lightroom, applying sharpness and clarity (not overly though) as well as other tweaks, I'm more than happy, then on export to JPG set to 20,000mb and sharpened for screen, I am not hapy with the final image. Comparing it to the original preview in Lightroom it's lost colour, depth and sharpness and generally it's 'pop'.
I must be doing somethign wrong.
I was told it's about preview mode, and viewing at 1:1 and also on the export at the same res will sort this.
Please have a look at the final images, is this comaprrison even legit?
I can not simply let the quality on the lightroom preview go to waste.. Even on a simple screen grab the difference is noticable.
Left is Lightroom, the right is 20k mb JPG export.

Another example here.
8k MB image on left LR preview on right.
Unbelievable loss... I thought it was the original.
I would be better just screen grabbing my images to use. Something has to be wrong here?

Similar Messages

  • How to remove watermarks from images which have been inadvertently applied via the Lightroom Export function? [was: Help!]

    I put a watermark on a photo in Lightroom 5  and exported it to a file. I then had another group of images which I exported and they all had the watermark on them and I can't get rid of the watermark

    Export the photos again, but in the Lightroom Export dialog box, remove the check next to Watermark

  • Lightroom Export Action and Automator

    Hi. Have an interesting anamoly that I hope someone an explain to me. I am trying to leverage Adobe Lightroom's export preset post-processing option to help in importing photos into iPhoto (where I can make easy use of the .mac photocasts). I created an Automator workflow comprised of the following actions: 1) Get Specified Finder items (with the export folder from Lightroom selected) 2) Get Folder Contents 3) Import Photos into iPhoto (with the delete source option selected).
    I placed the Automator app, named "Import to iPhoto" into the Lightroom "Export Actions" folder and selected it in the post-processing drop down in my export preset. When exporting from this preset, the file(s) are exported as expected, however, for some reason the Automator action imports duplicate files into iPhoto for each photo exported. If the photos are exported separately without the post-processing export action, and then the Automator action is run manually, there are no duplicate files imported. Does anybody have any ideas what might be occuring here?
    G5 DP2GHZ, PB G4 12   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

    Bump, Anybody??

  • How to make imovie export a sharper video

    how to make imovie export a sharper video

    set Firefox as your default browser ..start button >default programs >set your default programs >Firefox >set this program as default

  • Lightroom Export Color Shift

    Exported JPEGs from Lightroom have a significant color shift from how they appear inside LR and PS3, which is a distinct magenta shift and oversaturation.
    I have read a number of related posts here and elsewhere that explain the importance of setting up color management correctly in Windows, LR and PS3. I have done my best to follow all this advice and still cannot export usable JPEGs from Lightroom. I am using a Spyder 3 and have carefully profiled my Dell 2408WFP monitor. I am processing RAW images from a Canon 30D into sRGB JPEGs for web viewing, and have set up LR to export sRGB while PS3 is set to the sRGB working space.
    I have also read that Internet Explorer and other color-unmanaged applications will display images differently. I understand this, but then it seems to me that every image I view inside Windows Picture Viewer or Internet Explorer on this computer would have the same oversaturation and magenta shift that my Lightroom exports do, but this is not the case. Also, my Lightroom-exported JPEGs have an equivalent magenta-tinted and oversaturated appearance on other computers I use, not just my image-editing computer.
    I have set up a web page with example images, screen grabs and system technical information, located here: http://www.dougvetter.com/lightroom
    Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

    >What can I do to get predictable color output that looks good outside a color managed environment? All the web content I look at on this exact same system looks just fine in my browser.
    The only thing you can do is to calibrate your screen and export to sRGB jpegs.
    On average the images will look the same, however very few will look identical simply because there is a lot of variation among screens. The sRGB standard gives you the biggest probability of getting it right. Unfortunately with the current upsurge in people buying laptops, which have in general a far smaller gamut than sRGB (the purple blue problem is caused by bad laptop screens), sRGB is starting to deviate from the average because the average is shifting. At the same time desktop LCDs are giving greater and greater gamut as your DELL display shows. sRGB was designed to represent an average CRT screen. So the crappy quality of laptop LCDs and the refusal of MS to finally live up to their promise of color management in IE is really hurting our chances of getting the right color in front of people.
    What we really need is omnipresent color management and some awareness of computers of their monitor's profiles without having to calibrate, similar to printing profiles being delivered by printer manufacturers. They might not be perfect, but they will be good enough. Lacking that, we can really only try to calibrate our screens and use sRGB for web images.

  • Lightroom export order

    I am exporting a set of wedding pictures to a file.  In Lightroom I have moved a number of pictures around so that they are in chronological order.  When I export the pictures end up in their original order. I guess they are in numerial sequence. Any suggestion in preventing LR5 from resequencing the pictures?
    Steve Roberson

    [email protected] wrote:
    Not sure how to do this ... an additional extension...
    You need to make the sequence number the prefix, so files are named:
    001 my first file.x
    002 my seond file.y
    etc.
    Lightroom exports in order (first one first, second one second, and last one last), but the device you're using to view them (e.g. OS) is displaying via alphabetical order, or can.
    So the prefix assures alphabetic order is same as exported order, and hence same as order in Lightroom.
    Try this:
    Rob

  • Lightroom Export  Presets Missing!

    I have tried the restore presets under preferences and doing a repair as an installation option but neither restored Lightrooms presets. I am using V2.6.  Any ideas on how I get the Lightroom export presets?

    I assume that "OP" is slang for "other person."
    I am experiencing two problems:
    1.  Firstly I am missing presets
      a.  By presets I mean
                    a. keyword presets,
                    b. filter presets, and
                    c. custom develop presets.
      b.  "Just missing presets"  constitutes a great deal of effort for me, and it should be for you, since it's an issue that has been raised since to LR 2 and has been raise in CS4 as well.
    2.  I've also lost all my watermarks and am unable to recreate watermarks that actually appear on export files.
    For the record I am using LR 3.2 64 bit beta with Windows 7 64 bit
    I've been using them for months.
    This problem occured yesterday for the first time.
    I have backedup, as recommended by LR, several times.
    Restores have not helped.
    There have not been any recent system updates.
    The only plug-in I use is the export to zenfolio.
    The watermark problem is not related to the zenfolio plug-in, I have the same issue exporting to hard disk without the plug-in.
    The watermark editor does not show the choosen graphic as it last time I checkede (several days ago.)
    I don't understand why keysets are not part of the backup...
    Are they not part of the catelog?
    Feel free to ask me all the questions you want, but please help me resolve this issue.
    -sd
    Steve Delaney aka KamraGuy
    Paw Print Pictures
    [email protected]
    http://www.pawprintppictures.com
    815-455-1931

  • Why do I loose sharpness when I export out of Aperture?

    My images look almost blurred once exported out of Aperture 3.0.  !  I am finding in my reading that others have been having this problem for years!  Has Apple not fixed this yet?  I may have to go to Photoshop, but really don't want to!!!

    That doesn't sound right at all. My exports looks fine. I wonder if it could be some kind of glitch or something...
    Just out of curiosity, what do your export preferences look like? What quality setting do you have for jpegs, and what dpi for external editor file format? How about the dpi in your export presets you've been using? How about your RAW Fine Tuning sharpness sliders? (although that would affect how your images appear in Aperture, although it is subtle)
    Aperture has limited (but effective) sharpening options, and by default rendering the images are softer than what you might be used to if you used to process your RAW images with ACR (Photoshop, Lightroom). But I was able to match the default ACR rendering (in terms of sharpness, I mean) with Aperture by maxing out the sharpness sliders in RAW Fine Tuning and applying a Sharpen Edges adjustment with only mildly aggressive sharpening.
    Oh, that reminds me, which sharpness adjustment are you using? Sharpen is from the previous versions of Aperture, and is included for legacy/compatibility purposes with images that were processed in Aperture 1 & 2. Sharpen Edges is much more advanced and is generally recommended over the other.
    Doug

  • Lightroom export seems desaturated

    Ok, I'm stumped.
    Lately, I've noticed that the pictures I'm exporting out of Lightroom (5.4) seem very desaturated. This problem has been going on since before I upgraded to 5.4
    Now my first thought is obviously color management, but here is the weird part: pictures that I've previously exported now look less saturated now too... In other words, a picture that looked great exported a few months ago looks drab after a new export (no new adjustments) when viewed side by side on my iPad. What could've changed?
    Additionally,  I can globally adjust both vibrance and/or saturation to ridiculous levels on a file and the exported files still look duller on export than I would expect.
    Any ideas?

    here is a sample. These pictures were from the same file (no adjustments) - just exported several weeks apart.
    Another perplexing clue. I attached individual versions of the above two files to this discussion board and posted - they looked identical so I deleted that post thinking I was loosing my mind. I send both files to myself in an email then looked at them on my iPad and iphone. I could clearly see a difference. So I used a collage app to put the pictures side by side and sent them back in an email to my Macbook Pro....I can still see a difference now.
    Someone smarter than me can hopefully chime in, but can the problem be with how IOS is rendering recently exported pictures from Lightroom. Again, pictures exported more than a month look the same from computer to device (I have 2 pads/2 iPhones in my home). Yet, the same file exported today looks dull on all ios devices. I should mention that picture sites/apps like 500px are G+ still look vibrant and normal in all ios devices so I know they are able to render color.
    I have tried resetting my export presets and develop defaults - neither made a difference.
    One last thing, I have Lightroom mobile, and images in synched catalogs look identical on either my ipad to MBP screen. But again, once exported and viewed from any ios device, the colors become dull.
    Thank you for any suggestions.

  • Can't see Lightroom exports in Photoshop

    Hi, I'm having some problems seeing exports from Lightroom 5 in Photoshop CS6 on Mavericks. (I just upgraded to the 5.3 RC and 8.3 RC from the latest normal versions and nothing's changed). I'm temporarily using Bridge as a workaround, but it's a little cumbersome.
    The only red flag I can see is that the export options dialogue (original / copy with lightroom adjustments etc) doesn't appear except when I use the export to bridge option. I've tried reinstalling before and that didn't help. Has anyone else ran into this issue and solved it?
    Edit: I'm using "Edit as smart object" which almost seems better, but it gives me the error message below when I try to close the document:

    Hi,
    I think you have to deselect something ! - " a tool is open"
    close all tools and then try again and save as jpeg.
    olivier from
    http://www.pictures-books-for-childrens.com

  • How to find the original RAW file # from a Lightroom exported JPG?

    Hello, this is in regards to a Lightroom 3.5 exported JPG. This was a year ago when I had been told it was best to export files with simple renumbering of them from 1 to x... instead of retaining the original RAW 4-digit file name.
    I've currently lost the original files, and need to do a search for them via these 4 digits to see if I have them tucked away in any of my drives. I downloaded a metadata explorer, and it's telling me all the lightroom editing information, and everything else, but somehow does not have the simplest of information — that 4 digit original file name.
    Am I grasping at straws or is there likely to be any way to find this information out? I don't work with metadata, so there wouldn't have been any customizations to how Lightroom configures this....hoping that's in my favor. Any help is much appreciated!!!!

    A note about security (context: downloaded apps & plugins...).
    Anatomy of a URL:
    protocol://stuff.stuff.stuff.domain.domain-suffix/stuff/stuff?stuff=stuff
    None of this stuff matters much except:
    domain.domain-suffix (and protocol, to some extent).
    So if you download something from:
    http://ignafradifcawhatyousay.toolonganyway.my.server.com/gogafnoics...
    It's coming from server.com using http (web) protocol.
    But, if you download it from:
    http://my.server.com.badguy.tv/...
    It's coming from badguy.tv, NOT server.com, so if you want it from server.com - danger will robins...
    And, if you download from
    http://216.195.245.134/my.server.com
    It's coming from an unregistered internet address (216.195.245.134) - again: danger...
    (4 groups of up-to-3 digits separated by dots is the format for a literal internet (IP) address, instead of domain-name...)
    Summary: if you learn the anatomy of a URL, and pay attention to the URL's you are clicking on, or entering directly, you can take more responsibility for security, and assure (to a greater extent) you don't download from an unfriendly source.
    Disclaimer: I accept no legal responsibility for anything that happens as a result of anything written above...
    Rob

  • Lightroom export actions crashes photoshop

    Hello
    This is a problem that has eluded me for a while. Im running Lightroom 3 and photoshop cs5 (both have the latest updates) . Now I've created droplets that run various actions. In lightroom I export images and use export actions dialog box to have lightroom run the droplet.
    However now I get a "photoshop cs5 has stopped responding" and a "droplets can not communicate with photoshop.
    Im running windows 7 64bit
    Things I've tried
    restarting both programs
    rebooting the computer
    running lightroom and photoshop as an admin
    recreating the droplets and telling windows to run the droplets as an admin
    Any help would be appreciated!!

    bump

  • Digimarc watermarking as part of Lightroom Export

    I would *love* to see Lightroom and Digimarc get together to create an "embed Digimarc watermark" in the Export dialog box. It would be incredibly powerful and would allow photographers to batch resize and embed the digimarc watermark in one step to a group of photographs. Even better if it could read the year of the photograph from the metadata and add that to the digimarc watermark automatically.
    I know all this can be done with Photoshop actions, but going into Photoshop just to embed a watermark is murder on an efficient workflow.
    Thanks.
    Billy Sheahan
    Chicago, IL

    I think you'd have to call Exiftool in the post-processing section of the Export settings. Exiftool is an excellent third-party utility, which you can download here.
    I'm on Windows, and the following procedure seems to work OK.
    [That's when exporting to local disk - whereby after the export, the separate utility can be called, and is able to modify the just-saved file. I don't know for sure - but I would not expect this to work when exporting directly to a web hosted destination such as Flickr:]
    Make a copy of the Exiftool.exe program file.
    Rename the copy as follows: exiftool (-Keywords+=specialtag -overwrite_original).exe  - replacing "specialtag" with your desired keyword. (I didn't test for spaces in the keyword).
    In the Export settings, Post-processing section, select "Open in Other Application" and click Choose.. to browse to the above renamed Exiftool executable (program) file.
    Save (or update) your Export preset to include this extra step.
    As each file is exported, the Exiftool command window opens, executes and closes.
    RP

  • Leica Monochrom and Lightroom export problems

    I am using the latest version of LR on a 2011 Mac Book Pro. I am running into problems when I export Leica Monochrom DNG files that are shot AT AND ABOVE ISO 6400.  Lightroom is brightening the files on export a lot so that the final exported file does not look anything like what my edit looked like. This only happens with full resolution exports.  Other Leica MM users have experienced the same issue.  I have photos and screen shots to prove this.  What is the problem?

    What I was hoping for was an original raw image with all the OP’s adjustments intact so I could demonstrate what was happening at various zoom levels and with different settings, but that seems overly difficult to come by so I’ll give my analysis of what is happening and what to do about it:
    The brightening has to do with the micro-noise-grain that has been excessively sharpened making the image a mixture of mostly white and mostly black dots immediately adjacent to each other rather than continuous tone of a low-ISO image.  This is not an error with LR or with the camera, and will happen with any such image from any camera.  The “brightening” is merely the visibility of the white granules at 1:1 zoom.  When a zoom level less than 100% is used, LR or Windows Photo Viewer or Mac Preview must determine how to combine multiple pixels together to represent one output pixel in the reduced-sized image.   Different viewers use different methods to combine adjacent pixels into one.  Some use Average, some use Median, some use the value of a single pixel position to represent the entire reduced-size combination pixel—this is called nearest neighbor and is the fastest but least accurate.  LR is known to use a fast but inaccurate resampling algorithm which is why there is a warning on the Detail panel to use 1:1 zoom to judge sharpening and noise adjustments.
    The problem here is that this lightening and darkening depending on zoom level is messing with toning adjustments, so how to tone and adjust such images, is to temporarily turn off Detail sharpening and turn up noise-reduction then adjust toning in Fit view.  Then zoom in to 1:1 and adjust the noise-reduction up or down to remove most of the obvious grain, and turn up sharpen masking so all you’re sharpening is edges.  Maybe even turn off the Detail slider (set to zero) to keep from enhancing micro-noise texture.
    If you do want grain for artistic effect then do that after you’ve removed the ISO noise.   The difference with high-ISO noise and added noise-grain is the high-ISO noise is single-pixel in size and will not be resampled accurately while the noise-granules created by the Effects panel can be control both in size and intensity so as not to respond negatively to resampling nearly as much. 
    If you are exporting images to nearly full resolution then dial back the export sharpening quite a bit.  If you are resizing quite a bit smaller than any micro texture will have been averaged out by the resizing and adding more sharpening during Export sharpening will help things look crisp, again.

  • Lightroom Export into Dropbox loses metadata?

    I made some iPhone photos with a monochrome filter.
    Then imported into a windows folder and the photos dropped the mono filter and they switched to color
    Next I edited in lightroom and exported to a folder and uploaded to dropbox
    The photos that I left as full color in Lightroom reverted to monochrome in Dropbox.
    So I tested in Flickr and the photos all retained the properties as edited in Lightroom.
    anyone understand what happened?   is there a flaw in Dropbox?   Is there a setting I should have used in Lightroom to make sure the final develop settings "stick" upon export?
    thanks!
    -David

    Check out http://pkzsoftware.tech.officelive.com/lme.aspx
    Version 2 is now available and has some of the graphs you need.

Maybe you are looking for

  • SE61 - Dynamic Variable

    All, I had created a Dialog text using transaction SE61 that contains a dynamic variable Data Sheet not printed for Sales Order Number &WA_OUTPUT-VBELV& This diagonose object i am calling in function module POPUP_TO_CONFORM like   call function 'POPU

  • Problem with APDUCommand in javax.smartcardio

    Hi, There seem to be a bug (from my point of view) with the javax.smartcardio when i attempt to send a command over to the card. There a code frag factory = TerminalFactory.getDefault();         try {             terminals = factory.terminals().list(

  • Another question about receiver determination

    Hi friends Can we add a new receiver to the list of receivers in the  receiver determination , based in some condition only for this new receiver. Let us say we have the message 1 sent to receiver_1 and receiver_2 no matter what , but the message 1 s

  • My computer pretty much stopped working last night...

    Hi! So, last night first my safari stopped working. But iChat was still working. Then I decided to restart my computer. After that nothing would work, and my computer froze when trying to load something. I finally got it to turn off, and I tried to t

  • Problem using asterisk symbol (*) in Translation Rule

    Hello Everybody  Please any suggestion to make a translation from *100.. to 011056000 I have tried using num-exp and a translation rule but symbol asterisk is not supported as a prefix. Thanks in advance