Lightroom Folders management

Good day
Adobe file structure and Microsoft.......
I may end up by having  problems with my files (Folders) with the way I do it now......... Is there a better road?
I shoot in RAW (Nikon) and transfer all photos to:
A) File: Raw from camera. Photo:  +/- 14 MB
Then I process images using " DXO"  and save photos to:
B) File: To process in Lightroom after "DXO"         Photo:  +/- 70 MB
Next all pics processed/altered by Lightroom are stored in
C) File: Already processed/Finished. Photo
Then I go to the Print module, work on different sizes and store as JPG under each sizes worked on.
Sizes:  4 x 6    or         8 x 10    or 12 x 18
D) store copies of photos under either the 4 x 6 folder or the 8 x 10 folder.
Results are a duplication of photos in many folders.....
Is there a shortcut?
I am aware of Keywords and Collection, very handy tools but I'm still under the concept of Microsoft Windows Explorer's structure of files.
Best regards and thank you in advance
Ray

If you have to use DxO, there's no way you can avoid at least two version of each photo: a) before and 2) after DxO.
But from this point on, I see no reason to create more copies. Once you've loaded a photo to Lightroom, all you need is on master file. There's no point in saving derivatives after processing and for printing in different sizes. Just use that master to obtain whatever output you want and when you need. So, in your case, C) and D) don't make sense.

Similar Messages

  • SAP Net Weiver Folders Management

    Hello friends,
    I would like to understand the functionalities of SAP Net Weiver Folders Management as compared to SAP Easy DMS.
    Request to help me understand.
    Appreciate if you can help me locate a Installation , Configuration &  Business Scenario documents ( Master Data Documents ) from  help.sap.com  or any other accessible websites so that I can configure the same in my landscape.
    Thanks in advance,
    Shri

    Hi Shrikanth,
    NW folders Management is same like SAP Records Management. Functionality is same only the name is changed.
    Please have a look into below documents on NW folders management.
    http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/Found/SAP+NetWeaver+Folders+Management
    SAP Netweaver Folder Management (ex-Records Management)
    SAP NetWeaver Folders Management - Other Services - SAP Library
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Deepak Kori

  • SAP Folders Management

    Hi all,
    I will have to work on a project with SAP Folders Management. I see that there is a difference between SAP Folders Management and SAP Records Management. Can you explain this to me?
    While searching for a course online a found the same course for both?
    SAP Records Management in Detail (BIT640)
    SAP NetWeaver - SAP Folders Management in Detail (BIT640)
    What is the difference?
    Thanks

    Hi Maria,
    SAP Records Management and Folder Management are same. Only change of name
    Refer link below for more details
    http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/Found/SAP+NetWeaver+Folders+Management
    SAP Netweaver Folder Management (ex-Records Management)
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Deepak Kori

  • SAP NetWeaver Folders Management

    Hi friends,
    I have to setup a testenviroment for netweaver foldermanagment formerly RM.  I cannot find any guides for installation, no information about setting up contentserver .I know only, recordmanagment ist available with standardinstallation netweaver 7.3 ...
    Thanks for any help
    Kind regards
    Thomas

    Hi Thomas,
    Folders Management is included in Netweaver, so no need for separate installation. For testing purposes it is not necessary to use content server also. Just use SAP database as repository (can be chosen in the wizard when creating the content model) for both records and documents.
    You can use RMS-ID S_RMS_DEMO in organizer to create a recordmodel (or change the standard (empty) model), but you have to do some customizing and configuration before you can start creating records in organizer or scaseps with that model. That's because Folders Management is a set of 'building blocks' that need a minimum set of parameters before you can actually use it.
    Please refer to the online [documentation|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sem40bw/helpdata/EN/f5/18fc39eb31a700e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm] for more information
    Regards, Erwin

  • Can't get Lightroom Color Management to select custom profiles

    I can't get Lightroom Color Management to select custom profiles.
    - I select "other" in Profile,
    - a pop-up box shows me numerous profiles to choose from
    - I select a profile and the selection is highlighted
    - I press "OK" and the pop-up box disappears
    - but if I go back to the "Profile" selection line, only "Managed by Printer" is available.
    What's wrong here?
    Is the inability to select a profile the reason that prints from Lightroom look way to dark when I print them?
    Vick

    Oh, I'm on Windows, XP with SP2.
    The profiles are in C:\WINDOWS\system32\spool\drivers\color
    I used the .exe that was provided by Epson for installing the drivers.
    Nothing fancy, nothing different.
    For Lightroom, I installed it off CD, and got the 1.3.1 update off their Adobe site.
    Any clues there, to solve the puzzle?
    Vick

  • Logic of Lightroom Color Management

    There are, I know, endless posts about Lightroom color management issues. This question, I hope, will be somewhat different, as I don't have a specific problem, yet, but am trying to understand the logic of the software in the hope of avoiding problems down the road (as when I add file types, e.g.) I am also reading a book on color management, but it is on general theory with specific references to Photoshop CS3 (or 2), not to Lightroom. So here are my two questions and I'm hoping that the answers, should I be fortunate enough to receive any, will help not only me but other neophytes.
    First, the Adobe online manual says this: "For rendered files such as TIFF, JPEG, and PSD files, Lightroom uses the images embedded color profile to display the image, histogram, and color values. If the image doesnt have a profile, Lightroom assumes the sRGB profile, and the image may not look as expected on your monitor." Clear enough, but what does CS3 do when it is launched from Lightroom to do pixel editing on an image primarily managed in Lightroom? That is, if CS3 is used essentially as a Lightroom plugin does CS3 adopt the Lightroom color management or does CS3 independently have to be set appropriately for the image to appear the same in CS3?
    Second, the online manual says this: "Raw photo files generally dont have embedded color profiles. For raw files, the Develop module assumes a wide color space based on the color values of the ProPhoto RGB color space. ProPhoto RGB encompasses most colors that cameras can record." This is confusing, at least to me. Consider the paragraph above in this post, where the manual explains (or at least intimates) that if you create a file with values of a broad gamut such as Adobe RGB but don't embed that profile Lightroom will think it has a narrower gamut, sRGB file and the display will be off (unsaturated and washed out, I presume). That makes perfect sense. But why, then, does Lightroom assume for RAW files the wide Prophoto RGB color space when a camera might not record across this gamut? Wouldn't a camera that records in a narrower gamut cause the same problems for the display as does an Adobe RGB file read as if it were an sRGB file?
    Thanks in advance.

    >For rendered files such as TIFF, JPEG, and PSD files, Lightroom uses the images embedded color profile to display the image, histogram, and color values. If the image doesnt have a profile, Lightroom assumes the sRGB profile, and the image may not look as expected on your monitor.
    Funny but if this came from the manual it is actually incorrect. For tiff, jpeg and psd files, the image is rendered into the linear lightroom color space using the embedded profile or assuming sRGB if there is no color tag on the image. The histogram Lightroom shows is always based on the Lightroom color space with a gamma 2.2 toning curve applied no matter what the source of the file. To answer your question, if you do an "edit in CS3" from Lightroom a copy of the file is rendered in the color space that you requested in the dialog and CS3 uses that space if your Photoshop is correctly set up to respect embedded profiles.
    >Raw photo files generally dont have embedded color profiles. For raw files, the Develop module assumes a wide color space based on the color values of the ProPhoto RGB color space. ProPhoto RGB encompasses most colors that cameras can record.
    The manual is again not correct here! Embarrassing. I have never seen a RAW file with an embedded profile so generally is incorrect. Also, for RAW files, the module DOES NOT assume prophotoRGB color space. The actual primaries are actually stored in a internal database that is based on calibrations that Thomas Knoll and other ACR engineers did of the specific type of camera. They ARE not the prophotoRGB primaries. The RAW files are rendered into MelissaRGB using those primaries. MelissaRGB has ppRGB primaries but a linear gamma instead of 1.8.
    >hat makes perfect sense. But why, then, does Lightroom assume for RAW files the wide Prophoto RGB color space when a camera might not record across this gamut? Wouldn't a camera that records in a narrower gamut cause the same problems for the display as does an Adobe RGB file read as if it were an sRGB file?
    See above, the manual is wrong. Lightroom knows the actual gamut of your camera and uses that, not prophoto.

  • Lightroom folders disappeared (not missing)

    This is a real pain : ( & I will personally bestow a medal on anyone who can solve !
    ok, i have all my photos on an external drive (together with the lrcat), for weeks i've been able to plug the drive in and it shows all folders I've created in lightroom. Plugged the drive in today and only half of the folders now show, interestingly it's the last half of alphabetically sorted folders which are missing - and yep have tried scrolling down !
    The lightroom folders view on the left shows about 3500 photos for the external drive however 'All photograhs' at the top of the folder view reads 7000 odd and if i click on 'All folders' i can see all photos including those missing

    Did some of the folders get moved underneath one of the other folders?  You might try "Show In Library" on one of the photos that is apparently missing, but shows up when you click on All Photos, and see what LR folder path the photo shows up in.  If the folders are not moved or unexpectedly displaying elsewhere in the folder structure, then:
    LR3b could easily have a bug in displaying things or the catalog could have a slight issue that's stopping it from showing all the in the folders.  LR is also easily confused if you change the casing of a folder or drive letter.
    Backup your current catalog, first (w/o testing or reorganizing), then see what happens if you reorganize your catalog and test integrity?  What happens if you open your last backup catalog, are the folders there?

  • Facebook Settings in Lightroom Publishing Manager

    I have Lightroom 4 and I am able to upload photos to facebook via the Lightroom Publishing Manager, but only to my Wall Photos.  In the Publishing Manager settings under the "Facebook Album" drop down menu, I only have "Wall Photos" as an option, but that drop down menu is greyed out, so I'm not given an option to pick any other albums. 
    I am abl to right click on my Facebook service and "Create a Collection", but I'd like to know if I can create another default setting in the Publishing Manager.
    Any help?

    Try the 4.4RC - there are some Facebook related fixes http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroom4-4/

  • Lightroom image management - ready for professionals?

    Hi
    I have a client, which is doing professional gardening photography for various magazines in this topic. Her business ranges from magazine reports about individual gardens to delivering single images to different publishers as requested (for example by flower type, color etc.). The main thing is that her image portfolio isn't organized so much in individual shoots or contracts. An image can be sent to many publishers at any time. She needs to kepp track of this. She needs to know, which image has been published when and where.
    Before moving to digital recently, she kept track of here jobs with cumulus, which had more database capabilities, but much less possibilities in image adjustment. Shooting only raw with a Canon 1 series camera, she choosed Lightroom as here image editing and managing tool. Beeing pleased with the friendliness of the user interface and many of its image editing and managing capabilities, she (actually we) are astonished, that even in a version 2 it is still not really possible to keep track of what happens to the images in a professional environment (despite the claim of Adobe that the product is made for professionals).
    In essence the program isn't really capable of managing image data, which has a one to many relationship to the image (i.e. the instances of cases an image is sent to a customer). We experimented with virtual copies, which can carry individual metadata, collections (which cannot carry metadata) or storing the required data in the large description field. None of these possibilites were really satisfying. The most promising solution in using virtual copies, ended up in a maintenance nightmare, because it was too easy to forget, where to do which data management (at the master raw file or at the virtual copy).
    Then, I learned that with Lightroom 2 there is a possibility to extend metadata, but, unfortunately with the usual limitation of not supporting one to many data (in the SDK-documentation called "spreadsheet type data"). The rest of the SDK documentation did not reveal any other helpful way of solving the problem as the SDK deals mainly with export plugin programming or web stuff, which is of no use to the client. It is rather disappointing that Lightroom's extensibility is still so limited. Where is the programming interface, that allows the development of complete new modules?
    Given the slow pace, Lightroom development takes (I can expect that "breakthrough" extensions to the SDK will take even longer), I guess that my client can wait for another 3 or 5 years until anything close to true image management will come up.
    So we have to look for some intermediate solutions. Whereas other software (expression media, idimager, cumulus) may have better database capabilities, they lack in raw editing completely and are often more awkward to use. Therefore, I would like to ask the community here, how they handle the tasks described above with Lightroom or with other tools? Perhaps we have overlooked a Lightroom capability?
    One thing I thought of is to develop a special keyword hierarchy for contracts, but this also would not allow, all the images tracking needed.
    Any ideas? I guess there aren't any plugins, which can deal with one to many data.
    Kind regards
    Thomas

    Actually, we haven't ruled out keywords yet, in fact, at the moment it seems to be the only realistic possibility. However, I wonder if a growing keyword hierarchy can become unwieldy at the end, so I am sceptical, if this idea would deliver.
    In general, I think that Lightroom should more move into the direction of beeing a platform for other vendors. The limitation to web stuff and export solutions isn't enough. I hope to see third party vendor modules, eventually one which provides more professional image management and tracking capabilites, exploring the fact that Lightroom has a database underneath it.
    I would like to see a DxO raw conversion module or a lens correction module, fields where I think Lightroom and ACR are still not the best in its class (I think LightZone and DxO are the better raw processing engines).
    Unfortunately, I do not see Lightroom going much into this direction. Probably this is already too late for the version 3 release, due in 2010 (?), so we need to wait until v4 (in 2012 ?) until the situation improves?
    I believe many customers (especially professionals with precious time) need a fully integrated system, which can do image management and image adjustment at the same time. Lightroom is the right platform for it, if Adobe let it be.
    Kind regards
    Thomas

  • Lightroom "folders" section, eveything disappeared, how do I get the files back?

    Technically I believe the files are still within lightroom, and still on my hard drive. Under Catalog "All Photographs" it has all the ones I've ever imported to Lightroom. I was doing something and right clicked under the folders tab, thinking I was doing to delete a File under the Folders section that was empty and I didn't need in lightroom anymore. and everything vanished. I'm unsure how to get all the files in order again. All the pictures are still there. Just not in the folder's section with the names/section of my harddrive where I upload them too and name them. The raw files anyways. Someone please help me. What do I do?

    If I understand correctly, it sounds like the entire Folders panel vanished, is that right? If so, there are 2 ways to bring it back.
    Go to Window > Panels, and click Folders.
    Or, right-click the header of the Catalog, Collections, or Publish Services panels and click Folders from the contextual menu that appears.
    Most people seem to lose it from an inadvertent right-click I think.

  • How Can I Merge duplicate Lightroom folders

    Some how i have TWO folders of Lightroom.
    1st is :C>My Pictures>Lightroom
    2nd is:C>My Pictures>Lightroom>My Lightroom Photo Library>Lightroom
    This folder (My Lightroom Photo Library) is all my picture folders on the Drive
    Can I drag and drop from the 2nd into the 1st then delete the "empty" folders.
    Thanks for your consideration.
       Dave

    I think I have similar problem, however, I tried the suggested solution, but received a message saying "folder is already in Lightroom"
    To explain - Somehow I seem to have two sets of folders within my Lightroom catalogue which appear to duplicate in part my "My Pictures" folder structure.
    Each shows the same total number of images in the top folder. 
    My images are then split into further folders by year, and then sub-folders by date taken.
    The duplication seems to have started from some date in 2009.  New folders are imported only to one of my "My Pictures" folder.  I do not see them in my "original" My Pictures folder - although they do add to the overall image count.
    At the same time, folders prior to the mid-2009 date can be seen in this "new" My Pictures folder , however, although I can view them in Library Mode, when I try to Develop them, Lioghtroom tries to open them, but then shows a message saying "no photo selected" - when I go back to Library mode, the image is no longer there.  I can only access these images from my "old" My Pictures folder.
    Until recently this anomally, while annoying, was not critical, however as my hard drive is now almost full, I would like to get rid of this duplication, prior to moving all of my files across to a new larger hard drive, along with the catalogue.  I tried this by intially copying everything across, temporarily moving my orginal My Pictures on my C Drive, and then opening the copied catalogue in Lightroom - I had hoped then to be able to redirect the catalogue to "My Pictures" on my new external drive, however I then started coming up with the same problem of Lightroom saying that the folders were already in the catalogue.  I have reverted to my original catalogue and changed my C Drive My Pictures back to its original location - so I am back to square one.
    Can anybody help me, please ?

  • - Lightroom Color Management Hints & Tips -

    Summary
    If you have a profiled monitor and you experience that Lightroom 2.1 renders the image
    very different from the way Photoshop renders it, or that the Library and Slideshow modules render the image
    very different from the way it is rendered by the Develop module, chances are that this can be solved by re-profiling your monitor and saving the new profile as a matrix-based profile rather than a LUT-based profile.
    The full article
    Read the full article at: http://photo.bragit.com/LightroomColorManagement.shtml, which describes the background, the problem, the solution and the results. There are also some hints on the use of test patterns, choice of gamma, color temperature and luminance.
    I am sure many people may have opinions on these issues, so please run any discussions about the article in this forum.

    To Richard Waters:
    For normal mid-tone images (excluding shadows) viewed at 1:1, there should be no (significant) differences between Development and Library modules (and Photoshop). If you do see significant differences, there is something wrong with the calibration.
    As for Photoshop vs Lightroom: Photoshop is better for printing because it has a proofing systems. What one can do is to open it in Photoshop (with Lightroom adjustments), then do the proofing, and perhaps some extra adjustments to compensate for the paper, and then print the result either from Photoshop or from Lightroom. Printing from Lightroom has the advantage that it does the resampling and sharpening automatically.
    Choice of gamma when profiling is not very critical. 2.2 is reasonably okay (and the most common), although the sRGB gamma (if you have the choice) may be more optimal, especially for deep shadows. Color management works so that, in principle, if the bit depth from the graphics card to the monitor was infinite, it would compensate for whatever gamma you choose. Thus, in principle, you could choose any arbitrary gamma, and the image would look and print exactly the same. The only reasons to choice a "suitable" gamma are: (1) the bit depth is limited to 8 bits which makes it necessary to use a "reasonable" gamma so as to avoid banding and posterizations; (2) when viewing images from the internet that are not tagged with a profile, or using a lousy browser that does not understand CM, then the choice of gamma is critical since it directly affects the contrast of that image.

  • LightRoom Color Management

    Apart from the unique color space and behavior on certain export operations, Lightroom seems rather closed mouthed about color management. (This is a bit unsettling for someone used to all of the control offered by Photoshop) For instance, 1) is there any way to reveal the embedded profile of legacy PS files which have been imported? (all I can presently find for profile is "embedded") 2) what profile (and what gamma) is sent to a printer when printer color management is selected? 3) Is ColorSync enabled? and 4)Finally, is there any source which might make all of this clear?
    Bob Hesse

    Raw files have no color space, they are essentially Grayscale data.
    Existing rendered images have their own embedded profiles and thus color space but IF you apply ANY corrections using LR, you're converting into its internal color space to apply the edits. At that time, you're basically now in ProPhoto RGB (with a linear tone curve) so you might as well export back to 16-bit ProPhoto RGB.
    IF you don't apply an edit, the embedded profile will be honored if you open it in Photoshop.
    You might want to read this:
    http://www.ppmag.com/reviews/200701_rodneycm.pdf

  • Feature Request: Color code lightroom folders

    I have several hundred folders inside of lightroom. I would like to colorcode "favorite" folders to make them easier to find when moving imported photos from "Dated" folders into subject specific folders. Seems like this should be easy,
    Or is there already a way to do this?
    Collections will accept selected pictures but how about selected folders?

    The place to add your voice to an existing feature request.
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/colour_coding_folders_and_collection s_to_simplify_navigation_cataloguing
    This is a user-to-user forum.

  • Renamed Lightroom Folders Lost During Upgrade to v1.1

    It seems that the upgrade process to v1.1 has a bug in that folders that have been renamed just within in lightroom will lose their new name. Instead the display will revert to the directory name from which that batch of pictures were imported from.

    I am not renaming files, just the name displayed for a folder in the folder list (in the library module). Normally the display would look like:
    "raw" /mypath/20070625/raw
    But one can rename the "raw" displayed to something else, so I changed it so it would look like
    "20070625" /mypath/20070625/raw
    Unfortunately during the upgrade to v1.1, the display changed back to
    "raw" /mypath/20070625/raw
    and lost the renamed reference.
    Noah.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Bank Details in R12

    All, In R12, I found all the bank info are moved to Cash Management(CE). Can anyone please let me know which table maintains the bank branch information. I gone thru ce_bank_accounts and ce_bank_acct_uses_all tables. These tables doesnt capture bank

  • General managment on data in a program?

    Hello How does programs handle vast amount of data? What general principle is followed? Do they read/write to temporary files, has database something to do with it (I do not know how a database work)? After all, you do not need much effort to run out

  • What do i have to do to solve this? Battery Issue

    New MacBook. Bought sun 9th. Works perfectly. What`s wrong with it? It can`t work if it`s not plugged. It`s supossed to be a laptop, but it depends of a socket. I can`t turn it on if it`s not connected by the cable to the socket. On the screen appear

  • Remote deployment to Oracle10g AS 10.1.3

    How do I migrate existing deployment scripts for 9.0.4 to 10.1.3. Below is my current scripts which doesn't seems to work on 10.1.3. java -jar oc4j_remote_deploy.jar ... http://localhost:1810/Oc4jDcmServletAPI/ ...

  • Querying Oracle Text using phrase with equivalence operator and NEAR

    Hello, I have two queries I'm running that are returning puzzling results. One query is a subset of the other. The queries use a NEAR operator and an equivalence operator. Query 1: NEAR((sister,father,mother=yo mama=mi madre),20) This is returning 3