Lightroom to photoshop no camera raw

When i export raw,dng,tiff files to photoshop cc, camera raw never appears. I've tried tweaking settings, everything is updated. Why is this happening ???

There is no need to go to the Camera Raw interface. Lightroom has all the same exact controls as Camera Raw does. When Lightroom sends an image to Photoshop, Camera Raw is simply used to interpret the Lightroom adjustments. The image is interpreted and then sent directly to Photoshop. If you want access to the Camera Raw interface you will have to open your images as smart objects and then go to Camera Raw from Photoshop.
Added later: the workflow I described is what happens when you use the "Edit in Photoshop" option. You are talking about "exporting" to Photoshop. How are you exporting?

Similar Messages

Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 Now Available

Final releases of Lightroom 3.2, DNG Converter 6.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 are now available. Additional details here: http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2010/08/lightroom-3-2-and-camera-raw-6-2-now-avail able.html
Regards,
Tom Hogarty
Lightroom, Camera Raw, DNG Product Manager

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}Hudechrome wrote:
You have a wild hair about Bridge, Noel?
Not at all. I like good tools, and from everything I read Bridge is marvelous. I don't have anything against Bridge, I just don't need it.
As a computer engineer, I use my computer for WAY more than just Photoshop. As such, I do everything I can to have the operating system (via Windows Explorer) integrate things for me.
For example, via right-click or double-click or drag and drop onto icons:
I access my configuration management system from Explorer (Tortoise SubVersion).
I do searches (grepWin) from Explorer.
I compare things (Beyond Compare) from Explorer.
I start Photoshop and other image tools on raw and processed image files I manage with Explorer.
I start my development tools (Visual Studio and a host of utilities) from Explorer (e.g., double click .sln files).
I access my web sites with Explorer (via WebDrive).
I get file paths from Explorer (right click, Send to Clipboard as Name).
I access office management apps from Explorer (e.g., double click .doc or .xls files).
This is an abbreviated list. Explorer can be a VERY powerful integrator, and is at the center of my computing world at a higher level. So now you can start to imagine why I prefer Explorer for image work.
-Noel

Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 Release Candidate on Available on Adobe Labs

http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2010/08/lightroom-3-2-and-camera-raw-6-2-available -on-adobe-labs.html
with additional lens profiles available.

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}Hudechrome wrote:
You have a wild hair about Bridge, Noel?
Not at all. I like good tools, and from everything I read Bridge is marvelous. I don't have anything against Bridge, I just don't need it.
As a computer engineer, I use my computer for WAY more than just Photoshop. As such, I do everything I can to have the operating system (via Windows Explorer) integrate things for me.
For example, via right-click or double-click or drag and drop onto icons:
I access my configuration management system from Explorer (Tortoise SubVersion).
I do searches (grepWin) from Explorer.
I compare things (Beyond Compare) from Explorer.
I start Photoshop and other image tools on raw and processed image files I manage with Explorer.
I start my development tools (Visual Studio and a host of utilities) from Explorer (e.g., double click .sln files).
I access my web sites with Explorer (via WebDrive).
I get file paths from Explorer (right click, Send to Clipboard as Name).
I access office management apps from Explorer (e.g., double click .doc or .xls files).
This is an abbreviated list. Explorer can be a VERY powerful integrator, and is at the center of my computing world at a higher level. So now you can start to imagine why I prefer Explorer for image work.
-Noel

Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 final releases are available

Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 are now available as final releases on Adobe.com and through the update mechanisms available in Photoshop CS5 and Lightroom 3. These updates include additional lens profiles support among others. Check out http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/. Following the example of Adobe's collaboration with SIGMA, leading lens manufacturers such as Pentax, Tamron and Zeiss worked closely with Adobe to create some of the profiles.
-Simon

Excellent! Now if there were only a way to use my S95 in raw... I guess I'll have to wait another few months

Lightroom 2.7 and Camera Raw 5.7 Release Candidates now Available

http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2010/04/camera_raw_57_and_lightroom_27.html
Regards,
Tom Hogarty
Adobe Systems

Tom Hogarty wrote:
Here is a draft of my final release notes for working with Lightroom 3 and Camera Raw 5.7:
Viewing Lightroom 3 settings in Camera Raw 5.7
Before working in conjunction with Lightroom 3 and Camera Raw please set the Camera Raw preference to: Save image settings in: Sidecar ".xmp" files. By default Camera Raw will display the image adjustments exactly as performed in Lightroom’s develop module. However, at this time Camera Raw 5.7 is unable to support further adjustments to the following settings or tools:
Highlight Priority and Color Priority post-crop vignette
Enhanced Luminance and Color Noise Reduction
Grain effects
Process Version
Lightroom is also dependent on a compatible version of the Camera Raw plug-in for the "Edit in Photoshop" functionality to work properly. Camera Raw 5.7 will ensure that Lightroom 3 beta 2 will maintain that compatible functionality with Photoshop CS4.
Regards,
Tom Hogarty
Adobe Systems
That seems to clarify the interoperability of ACR 5.7 and LR 3. Thank you for that, Mr. Hogarty.
Now, for the benefit of those of use who are not and/or will not be using Lightroom 3 for whatever reason, perhaps Mr. Chan or you can address the question of whether ACR 5.7 RC has a different or improved Noise Reduction functionality over that of ACR 5.6, and/or whether this will be the case for the final, GM release of ACR 5.7. Let's leave any and all versions of LR out of the equation for a second, please.
I think I see improved Noise Reduction in ACR 5.7 RC, but I wonder if this is real or whether I've just improved my skills in handling the noise reduction sliders since earlier versions.
Thanks.
Wo Tai Lao Le
我太老了

How do I update photoshop CC camera raw to 8.4?

How do I update Photoshop CC camera raw from 8.3 to 8.4? I keep getting an error message in Lightroom 5 that my camera raw plugin needs to be updated to 8.4. thanx...Miriam

I don't know anything about Lightroom, but CC is best updated via the Desktop Application Manager. Unfortunately, that seems to be pretty flaky. There was an update for the Desktop Application Manager just a few days ago, which fixed a problem I was having. It only checks for updates once a day, so depending where you are in the world, you might not hear about an update for hours after other people. You can bypass this delay by signing out, and back in again, which forces a scan and notifies you of available updates.
In actual fact, ACR8.5 has just been released, but as a Release Candidate, and I don't think you get notified about RCs until they are released as full updates.
BTW It was interesting that you thought people would guess you are from Canada by way of your use of a French word. Wikipedia says that French is the official language in 29 countries. My first guess was that you were posting from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, or maybe even, (and this was just a guess) France!

Lightroom Advantages vs. Camera Raw

I have Photoshop CS5.1 right now.
As I understand it, the main advantage that Lightroom has versus Photoshop and Camera Raw is the workflow features that are especially optimized for handling large amounts of photographs.
Is there anything image-editing-wise that I can do in Lightroom that I can't in Camera Raw?
How essential are the workflow options?
Do you recommend I buy Lightroom? (Cost is not an issue, although I'd rather not waste 80 dollars)
Thanks.

One other point: the practical benefits of LR (as experienced by those who find it beneficial) derive from and rely largely on, foregoing the use of strict file-based thinking, and getting instead, into picture-that-you-see based thnking. This is disconcerting, but it's necessary to get past that panicky, missing-stairstep feeling.
LR will not truly pay off in simplicity and efficiency terms, unless used as an entire replacement for Bridge, IMO. It just risks complicating matters further, whether used as an adjunct or as a competitor Bridge.
Analogy: like adopting a healthy diet: it is not enough to start eating all the new good stuff - you also have to stop eating the old junk stuff. If you eat both together, you are not only still unhealthy, but also feeling very full (grin) and there's no point in blaming the dietician.
BTW I am NOT saying ACR or Bridge is "junk" here - very far from it. I am just pointing out that images need to have a single point of management, not multiple ones getting in each others' way. I would recommend anyone who has decided they need to use Bridge/ACR for some significant widespread reason, to commit 100% to that (possibly with some file-centric DAM to assist) and stay clear of Lightroom - under the exact same argument.
To really see the point of LR, it is IMO necessary to at least try giving it a chance: to stop micromanaging things with workflow folders and special file naming, stop using Save As to make different versions of your pictures, stop using Save for Web, and so on.
There's no point or profit either, in trying to force onto LR, methods and tasks it was specifically designed to let people get away from. It is not going to be well suited to those things, or even any good at them - why should it be?
There are so many laborious but (through familarity) invisible "of course you have to..." assumptions implicit or explicit in the standard approach:
one image version = one file
order of operations is crucial
a camera Raw and a camera JPG pass though different kinds of editing
save your work or it will be lost
put lots of effort into your library folders and filenames or you will have trouble finding anything
you need to constantly monitor and ensure where everything goes
best to keep different filetypes separate
move your images through different workstage folders so you can quickly see which ones have been worked on
make a new differently named file, to explore each variation in processing
you can't do anything with a Raw file, like print, unless you first convert it to a bitmap image
you'll need to make a folder somewhere and come up with suitable filenames, for uploading to the web
save a separate copy for each printing setup, scaled to print size at the right PPI
bulk working needs some advance planning, make and test suitable Actions
at a given moment you are working on a particular set of images
etc etc

What is the optimum core configuration for a new Mac Pro to process and manipulate very large (80 megapixel) images using PhotoShop and Camera Raw?

Hello:
I will be using creative techniques to process and manipulate a large number (hundreds) of very large (80 megapixel) images captured using a medium format digital back (Phase One IQ180).
Final output will be digital fine art imagery printed using an Epson 11880 at large sizes (up to 60 inches x ?), retaining the highest possible quality and resolution. I will be using Adobe CC PhotoShop and Camera RAW as well as Capture One software. PhotoShop filters will be used extensively.
The Mac Pro needs to be optimized for the above purpose and be useful for at least five years. I plan to max out all the other options (RAM, graphics cards, storage). Performance is more important than cost.
The few discussions I have found that mention optimum core configurations seem to lean toward 6 or 8 (but likely are not taking into consideration my need for manipulating a large number of very large files), so I am looking to this foum for opinions.
Thank you,
Kent

See if this helps
http://macperformanceguide.com/index_topics.html#MacPro2013

Can't open CR2 files in photoshop and camera raw

This weekend I rented a Canon 5D Mark iii. I have downloaded the files and all of the thumbnails in camera raw say CR2 and when I try to open Photoshop does not recognize this product.
I have:
Photoshop CS4
Camera Raw CS4
Canon 5D Mark ii
I have checked my updates folder and all my updates are current. Do I need to upgrade to CS5 or is there a way around this?

Hi I recently had a problem opening CR2 files in PHotoshop cs4. I had to reinstall into a new computer, so obviously it installed the basic programme and not the updates.
After trying everything, even calling the help desk, there was apparently nothing that can be donw as they no longer support cs4.
I kept trying and found a you tube video, which i cant find again to add the link but i followed the link and with what I did earlier I can now open CR2 files in my photoshop cs4
I found the relevany update that I needed to install and downloaded it, camera raw 5.2 ( Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Windows : Camera Raw 5.2 update ) this is the one for the Canon 5d Mk2
After downloading it would not update the progeramme so I was in the same possition, but i noticed the files were there and i just needed to put them in the right place in photoshop so carried on looking for were to put the Plus In.
This led me to the video.
To the point.
Download the update and save to a location where you will remember.
open Adobe photoshop and go to "edit"
Them " Preferences "
then "General "
Then " Plus-Ins"
At the top you will see " Add Plug-Ins Folder " Check this box then navigate to the "win64" ( this is because mine is a windows 64 bit computer and the download is specific ) and Choose it.
Shut down photo shop and try to open a raw.
Bridge doesnt work for some reason but im going to keep looking.
Hope this works for you as well.

Upgrade of Lightroom 4 with newest Camera Raws possible?

I'm still on Windows XP. My question: Can I buy Lightroom 4 and update Camera Raw files subsequently? Or is the only chance to use newest camera raws by using Lightroom 5? I want to get access to Olympus EM-5 Raw files (in addition to EOS 5D MII) and want to avoid for now changing the windows system.
Any advice very much appreciated!

Lightroom 4 is no longer sold. It would depend first on your being able to find a copy for sale. That said, you would only be able to upgrade your camera compatibility to LR 4.4.1. Any cameras added after 4.4.1 was released would be unavailable to you.
At this point the only alternative that allows you to remain on XP and continue to get the newest cameras is to download and implement in your workflow the free Adobe DNG Converter. It is XP compatible (at least for now) and allows access to the latest cameras, and its DNG files are backwards compatible to all versions of Lightroom.

Photoshop to Camera Raw in Bridge

I am TRYING to work with Iphoto, Photoshop CS5 and Camera Raw in Bridge. I have set Photoshop CS5 as my external editor in Iphoto. I double click on photo (jpg) and it opens in Photoshop. I need to take the photo (jpg) from Photoshop to Camera Raw in the Bridge. How do I do this? OR is there a way to go directly from Iphoto to Camera Raw in the Bridge? If by some miracle I can find my photo when in Bridge (iphoto makes finding a photo VERY difficult) when I make changes in Camera Raw they do NOT register in Iphoto. Without all the detail, I want my edited photos (camera raw/photoshop) to show up EDITED in iPhoto. Help!

iPhoto is cr@p. At the very least, you have to admit that it doesn't play nice with any other graphics application. Dump it.
Now, Bridge is a 32-bit application, so when you have Bridge host Camera Raw, Camera Raw also runs in 32 bits. In contrast, and even though it is the very same plug-in, Camera Raw runs in 64 bits when hosted by Photoshop.
To find your actual image(s) in the Finder, which the crappy iPhoto hides in libraries, you need to highlight said library in the Finder and Control-click (or Right-click) on the icon, then select Show Package Contents in the contextual menu. Then navigate in the Contents of that package until you find your original and drag it out of there to a sensible place where Bridge can see it.
Again, dump iPhoto. My ¢2.
Wo Tai Lao Le
我太老了

Opening JPG directly in Photoshop, passing Camera Raw

Hi! I would like to open JPGs that were edited in Camera Raw directly in Photoshop and I saw in this video from Russel Brown how I could do this. Only, he is using Bridge CS3 in the video and I am using CS4. The thing is that I don't have "Always open JPEG files with setting using Camera Raw", instead I have a dropdown with: "Disable JPEG support", "Automatically open JPEG with settings" and "Automatically open all supported JPEG". I tried these options but they don't help.
Menu options in the video
The menu options that are available to me
Do you have any solutions?
Thank you,
Victor

I just realised that setting to "Disable JPEG support" bypasses Camera Raw, but it has to be done to every file individually, and in that video from Russel Brown he just set an option and every JPEG opened in Photoshop bypassed Camera Raw. Do you know if this feature can be set in CS4 too?
Thank you,
Victor

Lightroom 2.3 and Camera Raw 5.3 Available - Note from Adobe

Lightroom 2.3 and Camera Raw 5.3 are now available as release candidates on Adobe Labs.
Lightroom 2.3, http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Lightroom_2.3
Camera Raw 5.3, http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Camera_Raw_5.3
Regards,
Tom Hogarty
Adobe Systems

Hi All:
based on the good work of Dorin above (post #19), he did a timeline of various releases of Lightroom from Adobe and it shows that from "version x RC" to "final release version" was around 1 month.
as it is already exactly one month now, it must not be too much longer till they will release the LR2.3 Final Version.
As for what Robert said in post #23, well, there's never any "guarantee" on a problem-free piece of software, or, for that matter, anything one purchases or anything in life, actually!! Yet, one can make educated extrapolations, right? From the range of comments thus far on LR2.3RC, it appears that it is the best version yet of LR2.x. This leads to the conclusion that it is probably a "good bet" that this version will likely lead to the least amount of issues, right? Maybe not "zero issues", but most likely, the least amount of issues from the various LR2.x versions available.
So by waiting, say, merely 1-3 more weeks approximately, i can go directly from LR1.4 (which i've been using for many months) to LR2.3 Final Release Version. It seems like it is a prudent and conservative move or plan.
What do the good folks here think, please?
thanks in advance for helping me to mull this over. If i were a PC expert, i'd be thinking about this less. as i'm just a somewhat competent user, and not a whiz, i thought that a bit of care and planning it out intelligently can possibly reduce frustrations later.

Please direct me to the Photoshop CS6 camera raw plugin for Canon G15 digital camera

please direct me to the Photoshop CS6 camera raw plugin for Canon G15 digital camera
Thank you

Hi, rich_fred.
As the Canon G15 is a very new model, support is not yet available through Camera Raw. In the meantime, try out the software that came with you camera, to see if it can export a TIF or JPEG, which should open up in Photoshop just fine.
Hopefully support for the G15 will be available in the next Camera Raw update. You can find a list of supported cameras here: http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.html

Photoshop CC Camera RAW and 32bit files problem

The new Camera RAW from Photoshop CC has problem with 32bit EXR,HDR files when camera calibration is set to 2012 mode. Very bright tones like specular highlights are flattened and there is no possibility to bring them back. Old modes (2010, 2003) are working fine.

Photoshop CC camera raw 8.5 where is the fill light and recovery buttons
Hi Teresa, you may have worked this out already? but i just downloaded Photoshop CC and I too used the recovery and fill light buttons and couldnt see them in the raw processing window... HOWEVER!! i did some research and they are available!! YAY, you can toggle between the latest and the older layout... and the recovery and fill optoins ARE there... the link explains it... but when you open some raw files... on the right you should see a little camera - camera calibration button when you click on there the first drop down PROCESS - change to 2012 mode and then click back to the BASIC processing wheel and they will be there... cheers Danni

Lightroom to photoshop no camera raw

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for