Limit bandwidth for users or S650

Is there a way to limit the bandwidth for all the users or the entire appliance.For example lets say you have a 9mb pipe however you dont want the appliance or all of the users combined to use say more than 6mb.Is this something that can be done now?If not is it a planned feature upgrade.
thanks

Charles,
Currently, there is no way to do access based bandwidth throttling or system wide bandwidth throttling.
Both of these features are filed under theses enhancement requests:
35364: Bandwidth limit for authentication group or ip range
39720: Bandwidth throttling (QoS) to maintain a solid client experience
Please contact your sales representative and inform them of the importance and priority of these features to you.

Similar Messages

How to limit bandwidth for guest per connection/user on 2504 WLC?

We have 2504 Controller with 24 AP's registered in a hotel and we would like to limit bandwidth per connection or per user.
I went to QOS Profiles > Bronze >
I do not see Per user Bandwidth Contracts(K)* instead I see WLAN QOS Parameters with below options.

Hello
Our WLC model 5508, but there is confusion on difference between Override Per-User Bandwidth Contracts (kbps) vs Override Per-SSID Bandwidth Contracts (kbps)
Our requirement-
On Guest SSID - Each user / session should not exceed bandwidth more than 758kbps upstream/downstream
Only Guest users cannot login to multiple device with single userID - applicable only to Guest SSID other SSID should not get impacted.
hope to get some response
cheers
ST

Spend Limit Approver for User in Organisation structure

Hi All,
User X is having 'A' as SLAPPROVER in organisation. Business wants to include 'B' and 'C' also as SLAPPROVERS for User X in organisation structure.
Is this feasible?Please let me know.
Regards

Hi,
For the single step spending limit workflow (WF10000276), if the approval limit of the manager1 of the employee is exceeded, then the workitem will be sent to the spending limit approver of manager1 and so on. So each user should have only one SLapprover maintained in the org structure.
However for the n-step value limit approval workflow, WF14000109, the system determines the first approver based on his approval limit, if this approval limit is exceeded then further approvers will be determined until the last approver has been found with an approval limit that is higher than the value of the shopping cart.
Kind regards,
Siobhan

Release PO against contract whit limit value for USER

Dear colleague,
We work SRM server 5.5 . SP14 extended classic scenario, and we use contract management.
We need to release PO against contract and we want to LIMIT the users that PO value have to be between 60 USD as minimum order value and 120 USD as maximum order value.
We know that solution for the minimum order value is to use the u2018minimum order valueu2019 in the contract item with the value 60.
Can someone help with the solution to limit user to maximum order value against contract.
Thanks
B.R.
Gil shinar

One option is that you could implement the maximum value logic in BADI BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI and give out proper error message if the user enters value outside of the range.

Limit bandwidth per user/computer using Catalyst 3560 switch

Hi -
Can someone help me getting started (if at all possible...) with enabling controll of used bandwidth at a "per-user"-level.
I wonder if it possible to do this dynamicly with respect to the overall demand from other users.
I've searching a lot, but I'm missing the terminology :)
Sincerly
Nicholas

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
To my knowledge, what you want to accomplish isn't possible on a 3560.
You can police at ingress, and if you use a policy map, you can police different "known" IPs.
What you could do, is police user ports ingress at some nomimal bandwidth, and if exceeded, mark the packets. Then on egress, you could direct those packets to an different egress queue with a lower bandwidth guarantee than the normal queue.

Restrict bandwidth for users in the house

This may sound like an obvious problem but since we had BT Infinity my lovely son has been spending more and more time on online gaming.. it seems some evening both my wife and I have to wait for pages to load and streaming football is a pain !
Is there a away of giving him bandwidth but sharing it out more evenly ?
Thanks

hi no the home hub does not have such a feature with infinity you should have no real problems are you connection by wireless or wired
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

"Subscriptions limit reached for same user" validation error when trying to create a subscription to a product - wha can cause this?

Hi,
I've created a third product level called "partner" other than the two that come as standard.
I'm running through the process of taking an existing user from the starter product to the partner product, and am subscribing the user to partner before removing the starter subscription. There seems no problem with a user having both a starter and unlimited
subscription, but am getting the following error when subscribing to partner.
"Subscriptions limit reached for same user"
This is using a subscriptions put. The same code works fine when upgrading to unlimited.
What can cause this?
Andy

Hi Miao,
The function to promote someone to partner is:
public async Task<ActionResult> ToPartner(string id)
//add partner subscription
var prodId = await APIMHandler.GetProductIdFromName("Partner");
var subscriptionId = Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
//set apim role to partner
var partnerId = (await APIMHandler.GetGroups()).First(a => a.name == "Partners").id;
await APIMHandler.AddUserToGroup(id, partnerId);
if (await APIMHandler.SubscribeToProduct(subscriptionId, id, prodId))
//disable starter subscription
await ApimDelegationController.HandleFreeSubscriptionRemoval(id);
//set local role to partner
await UserManager.AddToRoleAsync(id, "Partners");
return RedirectToAction("Index");
Where subscribetoproduct is:
public static async Task<bool> SubscribeToProduct(string subscriptionId, string UserId, string productId)
//The REST API and the delegation are inconsistent in how they represent ids.
if (!UserId.StartsWith("/users/"))
UserId = "/users/" + UserId;
if (!productId.StartsWith("/products/"))
productId = "/products/" + productId;
var client = new HttpClient();
client.DefaultRequestHeaders.TryAddWithoutValidation("Authorization", "SharedAccessSignature " + CalculateAcessToken(ApimIdentifier, ApimPrimaryKey));
var uri = ApimBaseUrl + "subscriptions/" + subscriptionId.ToString() + "?api-version=" + ApiVersion;
var response = await client.PutAsJsonAsync(uri, new { userId = UserId, productId = productId, state = "active" });
if (response.StatusCode == System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Created)
return true;
if (response.StatusCode == System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Conflict)
var error = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
return false;
if (response.StatusCode == System.Net.HttpStatusCode.BadRequest)
var error = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
return false;
var errorf = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
throw new Exception(string.Format("Error in SubscribeToProduct: return status {0}. Content: {1}", response.StatusCode.ToString(), errorf));
The status code is "BadRequest" and the error provided earler is returned.
So at this time the user is added to the "partners" group, but I can't subscribe them to the Partner subscription, which is accessible to members of the partner group.
Andy

Authorization in VKM1 for users based on credit limit?

hi all,
Does anybody heard about authorization for users in VKM1 to release blocked commercial documents? In my project, they want to set ranges for users :
Analyst 40%
Manager 100%
Director 100%
I looked for all SAP doc and i think its not possible, any thoughts?
Thanks and regards

Dear Monica,
You can do this with Roles & Profile (Authorizations).
Go to T-Code PFCG - Either enter the roles that currently exists or create a new role. Insert T-code VKM1in Menu tab page & then go to Authorizations tab
Expand the Thread Standard - Sales & Distribution,
Once again expand the thread Standard - Credit Doc. Value Class: Processing of SD Documents
Then expand the sub-thread - Credit Doc. Value Class: Processing of SD Documents
Here There is a option Document value class (credit management) - Here you can enter the Document Value that user is Authorized to release the block...
You might have to take help og your Basis person to create Roles & do the above...
Hope this helps...
Give points if Useful...
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta
Edited by: Jignesh Mehta on Aug 30, 2008 12:43 PM

Limit Bandwidth on Family Network for Certain Computers ?

My sister is always downloading and streaming a bunch of movies/tv shows and i still have school. So...is there anyway to limit bandwidth on her computer (from her computer even) or possibly allocate more bandwidth to my computer. No permanant soloution is needed. I've also tried the common terminal command that supposedly increases personal bandwidth: ...
bash-3.2# sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65536
net.inet.tcp.recvspace: 65536 -> 65536
bash-3.2# sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536
net.inet.tcp.sendspace: 65536 -> 65536
bash-3.2# sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0
net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack: 3 -> 0
bash-3.2# exit
...but havent had much success.
Any help would be appreciated
thanks

Unfortunately, the Apple routers do not have the ability to limit bandwidth on the network on a per device basis. It is first come, first served.

Limit bandwidth per port switch/VLANs?

I am using a switch to create multiple VLANs. Each network has a separate VLAN port on my 3550 configured. I want to control the bandwidth that port uses and restrict it. Is is there a simple command to do this or will I need QoS.
Basically Fast0/1 - max bandwidth out/in (300K/400K)and so on..
thanks in advance!

You need to configure Policing that will limit the rate users can use going through a particular port/vlan.
Policing involves creating a policer that specifies the bandwidth limits for the traffic. Packets that exceed the limits are out of profile or nonconforming. Each policer specifies the action to take for packets that are in or out of profile. These actions, carried out by the marker, include passing through the packet without modification or dropping the packet.
This example shows how to create a policy map and attach it to an ingress interface. In the configuration, the IP standard ACL permits traffic from network 10.1.0.0. For traffic matching this classification, the DSCP value in the incoming packet is trusted. If the matched traffic exceeds an average traffic rate of 48000 bps and a normal burst size of 8000 bytes, its DSCP is dropped:
Switch(config)# access-list 1 permit 10.1.0.0 0.0.255.255
Switch(config)# class-map ipclass1
Switch(config-cmap)# match access-group 1
Switch(config-cmap)# exit
Switch(config)# policy-map flow1t
Switch(config-pmap)# class ipclass1
Switch(config-pmap-c)# trust dscp
Switch(config-pmap-c)# police 48000 8000 exceed-action drop
Switch(config-pmap-c)# exit
Switch(config-pmap)# exit
Switch(config)# interface gigabitethernet0/1
Switch(config-if)# service-policy input flow1t
There is also example on aggregate policing. Here is a link on QoS:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/12225see/scg/swqos.htm#wp1044737
Please rate helpful posts.

Static credit check: credit limit exceeded for consignment issue delivery

Hi,
We are encountering a credit limit exceeded error in delivery creation for a consignment issue.
In SPRO config "Credit limit check for order types", no credit limit check is assigned to the order type. However, there is one assigned for the delivery type. Also, for CCAr/Risk cat./CG combination in OVA8 (Auto Credit Block Delivery), static credit check has been activated with error message reaction. Open orders and open deliveries were also activated. Customer exceeded credit exposure but user cannot release the order in any VKMx transactions as no credit limit check is assigned to the order type.
Given that this is the current setup, and the following conditions:
1. Credit limit for the customer cannot be increased
2. Oldest open item cannot be cleared just yet
Is there any way that we can proceed with delivery creation for this customer? The other order types have credit limit check so credit management team was able to release them. However, we are unsure on how to proceed with this consignment order. Kindly advise and thank you in advance for your help.

We are encountering a credit limit exceeded error in delivery creation for a consignment issue.
but user cannot release the order in any VKMx transactions as no credit limit check is assigned to the order type.
Looks contradictory and it may need to run report RVKRED77 to reorganization of open credit values. Try to run the report in test system and then run in production system. After running the report, the use must be able to release in VKM* transaction.
Regards,

Configuring group policy for user profiles in Windows Server 2012 R2 Domain

Requesting some experts advise on configuring group policy for user profiles.
We will be building new Windows Server 2012 R2 Domain Controllers (Domain of 400 users).
The settings which I am concerned:
1. Folder Redirection: Desktop, Documents, Favorites.
2. Quota for Folder Redirection - 1 GB per user.
3. Map a networked drive - 1 GB per user.
4. Roaming profile - (Will ignore if it does not suit our requirement).
The question is how outlook profile will be retained / automatically moved if the users move from once computer to other?
FYI, E-mails hosted on MS Office365 and OST file size of few users more than 25GB. So, in case the user moves from one computer to other, the entire mailbox will be downloaded via internet. This consumes high bandwidth if more than 3-4 users shift per day.
Thanks a lot for your valuable time and efforts.

Hi,
>>The question is how outlook profile will be retained / automatically moved if the users move from once computer to other?
This depends on where our outlook data files are stored. If these data files are stored under
drive:\Users\<username>\AppData\Local, then these files can’t be redirected, for folder redirection can’t redirect appdata local or locallow.
However, regarding your question, we can refer to the following thread to find the solution.
Roam outlook profiles without roaming profiles
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/3908b8e0-8f44-4a34-8eb5-5a024df3463e/roam-outlook-profiles-without-roaming-profiles
In addition, regarding how to configure folder redirection, the following article can be referred to for more information.
Configuring Folder Redirection
http://technet.microsoft.com/library/cc786749.aspx
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Frank Shen

Designing Java Apps for Users Without a JRE Installed Yet

Hi, sorry if this post is in the wrong place, but here goes:
I'm designing a Swing Java application for a client. My client intends to distribute/sell this application.
I'm concerned because, chances are that at least one of the people he distributes this application to will not have the JRE installed and will thus be unable to run the application.
Can anyone give me some suggestions on ways I can make my application more convenient for users without the JRE currently installed? Even some kind of error message that would direct the user to the JRE download site would be okay.
kwikness
Edited by: kwikness on Dec 2, 2009 5:56 PM

Use NSIS and package your application with JRE.
Add your jar files to lib/ext of the JRE package.
NSIS can create a short cut (desktop/start menu) to launch java class/jar file
I would not use webstart unless you are sure that clients will have access to the internet, the bandwidth is not an issue and installing the new JRE is allowed (permissions, SLA, etc.)
Best regards.

In HTTP log: Store Critical: Unable to read index file for user/ uid

All:
Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)
libimta.so 6.2-7.05 (built 12:18:44, Sep 5 2006)
We recently have started to see the following errors in our http logs:
[01/Mar/2007:13:03:43 -0500] httpd[5174]: Store Critical: Unable to read index file for user/<uid>: System I/O error. Administrator, check server log for details.
It's occurring a couple of different times during the day to certain users. Then it won't happen for days to anyone, but then start up again. I saw a similar thread to this re: IMAP and I'm curious if http could be having the same problem. We increased the number of process of http (from 2 to 4 a few months ago) but kept the same maxsessions (6000), so maybe I need to change the maxsession to something lower? We only started to see the I/O error two weeks ago We're not seeing the error in imap logs. Also there's no errors in the default log related to the users that receive this in http.
I'm planning on running a reconstruct -m in the mean time to see if that helps. There have been no changes to the server or application for quite some time. Any thoughts?

Yes, http can have the same issue. Yes, lowering the maxsessions from 6000 is the answer, IF it's the same problem. Likely, but not guranteed.
If you actually look at the store.idx for that particular user, what do you see? Is it near 2 gig? If so, then the user needs to either delete some messages or move some to another folder, as 2 gig is the limit for the store.idx file.....
jay

How to get the approval limit of a user

Hi,
Is there any table to get the value of approval limit of a user?
Other than using the FM "BBP_BW_GET_APPR_LIMIT"are there any ways to get the approval limit of a particular user provided his username is given?

Hi Sowmya,
You can use the FM 'BBP_READ_ATTRIBUTES'
Pass the username in IV_USER
IV_SCENARIO will have the value BBP
and the value for IV_ATTR_SINGLE can be taken from the table T77OMATTR.
You can also go thorugh the following link for getting help to call this FM:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/srm/codeSample2-Reporttodisplayuserattributes
Thanks,
Pradeep

Limit bandwidth for users or S650

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for