Limited Access permissions missing

SharePoint 2013 does not show limited access permissions (ie disabled inheritance on subsite http://sp/site1 but
http://sp does not list a user with unique permissions as limited access).  Tried several install instances, anyone should be able to replicate this (RTM and ServicePack 1)

This is what I got to know while migration and I don't have any direct link but you can see this post:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/28481b1b-28c1-4b79-8726-67c6ee80c860/sharepoint-2013-entry-for-user-with-limited-access-permission?forum=sharepointadmin
Bistesh

Similar Messages

  • Limited Access not working as intended

    In SharePoint 2010 when Limited Access (fine grain permissions) is enabled you could assign permissions for a user on a list item or list etc. SharePoint would then grant Limited Access permissions for that same user on parent scopes. This allowed the user
    to have access to shared resources such as navigation and master pages allowing him to traverse to the target item or list without having access to any other content.
    I can't seem to replicate this in SharePoint 2013. I have the following features:
    SharePoint Server Publishing Infrastructure: Enabled (site collection feature)
    Limited-access user permission lockdown mode: Disabled (site collection feature)
    SharePoint Server Publishing: Enabled on all sites (Site feature)
    If I assign permission to a user for a list. The user can view that list via URL, but cannot view the parent webs/sites. Cannot view the navigation (site scope).
    If anyone has any idea as to why Limited Access isn't working as I hoped it would, I would be very appreciative of any help!
    Regards,
    Damien

    Since Publishing is enabled, the pages are stored in the Pages library and CSS etc is stored in the Style library.  Make sure that users have access to those locations.  If they don't then having limited access won't allow viewing the default
    page and navigation.  I suspect in 2010 you were using sites where the default page was stored directly in the site root folder rather than in a library.  Changes in 2013 moved away from that design.  So limited access normally won't allow display
    of the root site unless you also give users access to the page and any additional required material.
    Paul Stork SharePoint Server MVP
    Principal Architect: Blue Chip Consulting Group
    Blog: http://dontpapanic.com/blog
    Twitter: Follow @pstork
    Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves your problem.

  • Limited Access in parent objects not working

    In my scenario I've a document library with several document sets. I break the role inheritence in the document set and provide individual permissions for users.
    The thing is, that no limited access is granted to the parent object (list and web). Does that change in SharPoint 2013? I saw that the method AddToCurrentScopeOnly is new for developers - does SharePoint use that method, too for adding users?
    Is there a way how I can change the behavoiur to the old one (like 2010)? Or what is the recommended workaround.
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi Fidy13,
    In SharePoint 2010, it shows the Limited Access permission in the parent scope. For site administrators, it is very hard to manage site permissions because they cannot make sure where the limited users have permissions or not.
    In SharePoint 2013, although it doesn’t show Limited Access permission in the parent scope, the users who have limited aceess permission can access the specified scope, and when you remove the permission in the specified scope, the limited access is removed.
    It is convenient to site adminitrators to manage the site. So , I don’t recommand you change it.
    Here is a similar post for you to take a look at:
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsapps/en-US/8ce65f4b-fe3b-4326-b4c3-41c0fb427c40/sharepoint-2013-limited-access-permission?forum=sharepointgeneral
    I hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Wendy
    Wendy Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Limited access group for some switches only

    Hi ,
    We have around 80 x cisco 3750 switches using AAA Windows Radius server and AD as authentication for IT users login.
    How do we setup a limited access group which allow them to access some switches ONLY?
    Any advice is very much appreciated.
    Thanks
    Qle

    Well its Prod (you have a dashboard called testdashboard in Prod?) anyway - someone might have changed the presentation catalogue permissions on the dashboard. All it takes is for someone to remove 'Everyone' or change a Group permission and it could effect.
    If they changed the Parent folder and cascaded the changes down this might cause this issue.
    You have a folder called 'Shared' - check the groups that the people are in have 'Traverse' , 'Read' or higher. Also chek dashboard permissions themselves from Settings-Manage Interactive Dashboards - Check the Padlock icon.
    Are you users getting allocated into the correct WEBGROUPS ? Is this assisngment done explicitly in the webcat or via an RPD Variable ? Have you checked NQQueryl.log to make sure any init blocks are completing successfully?
    Either persmissions have changed or group memebership is not completing.
    Good luck
    Alastair

  • An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions -- this.RaiseExceptionIfNecessary();

    I'm relatively new to Azure websites...
    Have made a website that uses a proxy web service to retrieve data from another web service. When I publish the website to my Azure website I get the following error:
    An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions 127.0.0.1:53775
    public string Result {
    Line 250:            get {
    Line 251:                this.RaiseExceptionIfNecessary();
    Line 252:                return ((string)(this.results[0]));
    Line 253:            }
    Probably a configuration issue, but I do not know what is missing. Have seen similar during my research for this but the issues have been more related to databases.
    Can anyone help me here?

    you cannot open new ports on the worker. Better reference the assembly that makes external call and use it directly instead using it as a proxy service
    Galin Iliev [MCSD.NET, MCPD], http://www.galcho.com

  • "Custom Access" permissions are locking me out of my own computer!

    "Custom Access" permissions are locking me out of my own computer!
    I have a Mac Book Pro which I can no longer access, due, I believe, to a problem with disk and file permissions. When I attempt to open up the volume, which I am able to put in FireWire target mode and mount on the desktop of a nearby iMac G5, I get an error message saying: "The folder 'MacBook Pro' could not be opened because you do not have sufficient access privileges."
    When I select the 'MacBook Pro' volume and run the Get Info command, I learn that the system, admin, and everyone else groups now have "custom access." I suppose that this newly acquired "custom access" is the reason that the volume icon now appears on the desktop with a lock at its lower left corner! Unfortunately, that lock is keeping me out, so I need help in finding the key back in!
    How all this came about overnight is a mystery wrapped in a enigma similar to my getting pneumonia last summer. Coming down with both diseases would require telling long stories that would only have as their common objective the desire to be cured. I might have gotten the pneumonia at my college reunion; my laptop computer might have caught a cold last night when I ran TechTool Pro and optimized my volume prior to installing its eDrive today. Or, my laptop computer may have choked when I tried to add Disk Warrior to the TechTool Pro eDrive and inadvertently issued some command that resulted in my normal permission settings getting changed and rendering everything on the computer completely inaccessible to me. Who knows for sure? Right now, the cause doesn't matter: finding the solution does.
    I used TechTool Pro to run a series of tests before (and after) I got locked out of my own computer and the volume passed all the tests for volume integrity and file integrity. TechTool also rebuilt the directory, defragged all the files, and optimized the hard drive into one, large, well-organized segment of files --that I unfortunately can no longer access!
    *What I think I need now are some very explicit, error-free, Terminal (UNIX) instructions telling me how to change the permissions on an external FireWire volume called "MacBook Pro" containing Leopard Mac OS X 10.5.7 from its current custom access privileges back to my settings before my poor computer caught this disabling cold.*
    I do have a SuperDuper clone of this MacBook Pro computer on an external FireWire, which I could probably use to relieve me of my pain. But, if at all possible, I would like to call upon that option only as a last resort for two reasons:
    (1) I am not entirely comfortable that the clone is completely reliable at this moment. My last cloning operation last night (before this corrupted permissions problem occurred) did not complete itself, leaving the cloned volume in an unknown, or unstable, state. (2) I would like to use this problem as an opportunity to grow and learn more about the Terminal and UNIX commands.
    I have read the relevant sections in David Pogue's missing manual on Mac OS X Leopard, so I am familiar (in theory) with the concepts he explained regarding ownership, file permissions, the root, Terminal, the CHMOD command, and the SUDO command. It's just that, considering the awesome power of the SuperUser Do command, I'm not all that confident yet that I could write the command(s) that could affect the state of my entire computer hard drive. So, *I'm asking for guidance from a UNIX guru to guide my hand this first time out.*
    I know about the idea of safe booting up as a single user, but since I do have my laptop computer mounted on the desktop of my iMac as a Firewire volume, I would prefer to use Terminal on the iMac to fix the permissions on that mounted volume, called "MacBook Pro".
    *Experts only, please*. Theories about what might have caused this problem would be nice, but what I really need is explicit command line code to cure this one. Since other people may occasionally encounter this problem of being locked out of their own computer, it would be fine with me if some knowledgeable guru wants to use this as a springboard to write a detailed tutorial on the topic along the way to the solution. Thanks.
    bowlerboy_jmb

    {I read that article you sent me to, Baltwo, but it does not seem appropriate, because the disk is not invisible. It's locked! I also went through all the discussions on flag changing you directed to me to look up, and I tried to apply something from there to my situation. But that's not working for me yet either. The topics there seem to be close enough to be relevant to my case, but none are exactly on the mark, and so far they deliver no cigar. Maybe I missed the one thread you had in mind from among the twenty I looked through: I can't be sure. You point it out, if you have one in mind. Anyway, in the absence of anyone providing me with specific Unix code or suggestions about my particular situation, I plunged ahead on my own, and I attempted to write some Unix code that might fix my problem. So far, I've had no success. This posting intersperses my comments along with the lines of Unix code which were displayed on my MacBook Pro during my recent attempts to tinker under the hood. My remarks are contained inside of curly brackets like { and } while the results of my Unix experimenting in Single User Mode on the laptop are presented without curly brackets. These were initially notes to myself, so I'm creating a post around my Unix dabbling to see if it triggers any feedback, corrections, and guidance for moving ahead. I'm stuck right now.}
    date
    Fri Jun 19 17:52:25 EDT 2009
    :/ root# sudo chflags nouchg /
    sudo: can't open /private/etc/sudoers: Permission denied
    :/ root# sendmail: warning: valid_hostname: empty hostname
    sendmail: fatal: unable to use my own hostname
    :/ root# ls -l
    {The screen filled up with rows of file names and their permissions, like...}
    drwxrwxr-x+ 43 root admin 1462 Jun 16 04:36 Applications
    :/ root# exit
    {Nothing happens for quite a while, then...}
    jettisoning kernel linker.
    {...and then several lines of replies fill up the screen, ending in that same loop regarding no such file or directory found, in regards to mDNSResponder. I had tried the {chmod 775 > solution recommended by a user at a web site I Googled to deal with the mDNSResponder problem he had. The chmod 775 / command worked for him, he reported, but it does not succeed for me. The mDNSResponderline continues to repeat itself ad infinitum, so I must force the Mac to turn off by holding down the power button for several seconds. Upon restart in Single User mode, I observe that, as before, "Root device is mounted read-only," so this time I try to amend permissions at the root level with...}
    :/ root# sudo chmod 755 /
    {If I understand what I've just learned about Unix, this tells the Mac to give me permission to do anything, but to give all others permission only to read and execute. Unfortunately, the command fails. The computer again responded with the same lines that it gave me when I had issued the command regarding no user flags, namely:}
    sudo: can't open /private/etc/sudoers: Permission denied
    :/ root# sendmail: warning: valid_hostname: empty hostname
    sendmail: fatal: unable to use my own hostname
    {So, to summarize, I have a MacBook Pro which I am apparently locked out of and cannot change. The hard disk is not invisible: it will appear as an external drive when placed in Target Mode and connected via a Firewire cable to an iMac. I tried to use Terminal on that iMac to change permissions on the MacBook Pro, but permission was denied.
    {So, I have tried to make changes on the MacBook Pro directly. I learned that it will neither start-up under normal circumstances nor via Safe Boot mode. It will, however, start-up under Single User mode. Based on my bleary-eyed crash course in Unix throughout all of last night and early this morning, I did gain some additional understanding about UNIX from some [free online books|http://www.scribd.com/doc/12747795/Made-Easy-Unix-for-Beginners] and articles, especially from a thorough and lucidly written article at Indiana University called [In Unix, how do I change the permissions for a file?|http://kb.iu.edu/data/data/abdb.html]
    {Also, I followed the links to the Apple discussions on user flags, and I cherry picked the most appropriate solutions suggested there to see if they will apply to my situation. However, none quite fit. None have thus far succeeded. I think I now know how to formulate the syntax of Unix commands in regards to modifying permissions, and I'm willing to plow ahead and try things out. But I'm only a rank beginner in this Unix realm, so maybe I'm doing something wrong in that department.
    {It just boggles my mind that someone can inadvertently be locked out of their computer without a way back in, so all I'm asking for is some trouble-shooting guidance to find the key back in. Anyone got it? Is this a problem that can be cured by writing some Unix commands to the system? Or, does the solution lie elsewhere?}
    bowlerboy_jmb

  • I am trying to import developed images from LightRoom 5 in o Photoshop 6.  I am receiving this message and the images will not open.....'Could not open scratch file because the file is locked, you do not have necessary access permissions or another progra

    I am trying to import developed images from LightRoom 5 Photoshop 6 for further editing.  I am receiving this message and the images will not open.....'Could not open scratch file because the file is locked, or you do not have necessary access permissions or another program is using the file.  Use the 'Properties' command in the Windows Explorer to unlock the file. How do I fix this?  I would greatly appreciate it if you would respond with terms and procedures that a computer ignorant user, such as me, will understand.   Thanks.

    Have you tried restoring the Preferences yet?

  • I am trying to import developed images from LightRoom 5 into Photoshop 6.  I am receiving this message and the images will not open.....'Could not open scratch file because the file is locked, you do not have necessary access permissions or another progra

    I am trying to import developed images from LightRoom 5 into Photoshop 6.  I am receiving this message and the images will not open.....'Could not open scratch file because the file is locked, you do not have necessary access permissions or another program is using the file.  Use the 'properties' command in the Windows Explorer to unlock the file'.  This has not happened before.  How do I change this?

    Could not open a scratch file because the file is locked or you do not have the necessary access privileges. (…) | Mylen…
    Mylenium

  • I have PS 6 and just purchased an iMac and am running OS 10.10.1 (Yosemite).  When i try to Save or Save As a file I get the following message:  Could not save as "Whatever.psd" because this file is locked, you do not have necessary access permissions, or

    I have PS 6 and just purchased an iMac and am running OS 10.10.1 (Yosemite).  When i try to Save or Save As a file I get the following message:  Could not save as "Whatever.psd" because this file is locked, you do not have necessary access permissions, or another program is using the file.  Use the Get Info command in the Finder to ensure the file is unlocked and you have permission to access the file.  If the problem persists, save the document to a different file or duplicate it in the Finder.  Any suggestions?  Thanks.

    Photoshop: Basic Troubleshooting steps to fix most issues
    Look under Troubleshoot User Permissions.
    Gene

  • When I close Photoshop CS6, the following message appears: "Could not save Preferences because the file is locked, you do not have necessary access permissions, or another program is using the file.

    When I quit Photoshop CS6, the following message appears:
    " Could not save Preferences because the file is locked, you do not have necessary access permissions, or another program is using the file. Use the ‘Get Info’ command in the Finder to ensure the file is unlocked and you have permission to access the file. If the problem persists, save the document to a different file or duplicate it in the Finder."
    If I try to change the Workspace in PS6 from Essentials to any other Workspace, the following messsage appears:
    "Could not apply the workspace because the file is locked, you do not have necessary access permissions, or another program is using the file. Use the ‘Get Info’ command in the Finder to ensure the file is unlocked and you have permission to access the file. If the problem persists, save the document to a different file or duplicate it in the Finder."
    I have checked the Sharing and Permissions section of the "Get Info" panel accessed from the Finder and I have set Read and Write Privileges for my user account for Photoshop CS6. System and Admin are also set to Read and Write.
    I have a MacBook Pro with OS X Version 10.9.5 and have all available updates for Photoshop CS6, Lightroom 5 and Bridge CS6.
    I tried uninstalling the program and downloading it again and reinstalling, but nothing changed.
    Can you help?
    Thanks,
    cjpnm

    You may get better help in Photoshop General Discussion
    The Cloud forum is not about using individual programs
    The Cloud forum is about the Cloud as a delivery & install process
    If you will start at the Forums Index https://forums.adobe.com/welcome
    You will be able to select a forum for the specific Adobe product(s) you use
    Click the "down arrow" symbol on the right (where it says All communities) to open the drop down list and scroll
    If FINDER means Mac, read below (and try to give more information when asking a question)
    Mac 10.9.3 workaround https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1489922
    Enable Mac Root User https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1156604
    -more Root User http://forums.adobe.com/thread/879931
    -and more root user http://forums.adobe.com/thread/940869?tstart=0

  • Photoshop won't start: Could not open a scratch file because the file is locked, you do not have necessary access permissions, or another program is using the file.

    Adobe Photoshop CS6 Extended
    "Could not open a scratch file because the file is locked, you do not have necessary access permissions, or another program is using the file."
    I've tried finding and checking and fixing permissions but no success.
    This happened from one day to the next. I think it has to do with the sn attached to the disk rather then the motherboard. I have the suite co-installed with Symphony 5.05. I've tried reinstalling.
    What's to b done? The rest of the Creative Suite 6 (AE, AI etc.) works fine.
    Anyone...?
    Loui

    Have you tried restoring the Preferences yet?

  • How to set up full access and limited access wireless networks to laptops

    Dear Apple,
    I just received my Apple 1 TB Time Capsule. Can someone please help me with a network configuration I want to set up?
    I have a cable modem, and, three computers: a G4 iMAC (system 10.5.5), an Apple MacBook (system 10.5.5), and, a PC laptop.
    The Time Capsule is connect directly to the cable modem.
    Regarding the computers:
    (1) I want the G4 iMAC to connect directly, via an Ethernet cable, to the Time Capsule, WITH FULL ALLOWED ACCESS to the Time Capsule and to the back-up function of the Time Machine feature, and, with allowed access to my HP inkjet printer (class 6110);
    (2) I also want the MacBook laptop to wirelessly link to the Time Capsule via the Airport utility on the laptop, and, WITH FULL ALLOWED ACCESS to the Time Capsule and to the back-up function of the Time Machine feature (using WPA/WPA2 security, and, without the network name visible to third parties), and, WITH allowed access to my HP inkjet printer (class 6110);
    (3) I want the PC laptop to wirelessly link to the Time Capsule (using WEP security), but WITHOUT ACCESS to the Time Machine, WITHOUT access to the back-ups on the iMAC, WITHOUT access to the back-ups on the MacBook, and, WITHOUT access to the inkjet printer --- I only want the PC to use the Time Capsule as a WIRELESS ROUTER so that the PC laptop can access the internet.
    (4) And, finally, I want to specify (Time-Capsule/Time-Machine/server ) access ONLY to the iMAC and the MacBook, so that others cannot gain any access.
    I specifically need help to set up and configure the Time Capsule so that the PC laptop, as stated above, should have limited access to the Time Capsule --- namely, only to access the internet, and, not even be aware of stored data on the Time Capsule, not even be aware of the inkjet printer, and, not even see my WPA network name when the PC scans for wireless devices.
    I also want the iMAC and the MacBook to have access to each other’s data stored on the Time Capsule (like a common server).
    I have an old D-Link DI-624 wireless router that I used before buying the Time Capsule, which is available, if needed. Hopefully, I can configure the Time Capsule so that I would not need the old D-Link.
    Thank you in advance,
    David.

    The basic method for remote access is not changed.
    http://gigaom.com/apple/access-your-time-capsule-over-the-internet/
    You have a few issues.
    The really big one.. the school firewall should not let you connect to home.
    Check the IT admin at your school but if they allow anything but a few protocols like http and https through, they are not doing their job. You cannot afford in a large network to have every Tom Dick and Harry access any open device.. that can introduce viruses and trojans into the network behind the firewall.
    The general method for remote access on large networks is vpn and the TC offers no vpn connection.. just AFP.
    If you intend using 3G wireless stick or the like then you can get access.
    The next issue is static public IP or how to find the TC.. you need some way to find the IP if your ISP does not offer static ip, and the tc has no dyndns client. Since Apple shut down new users for mobileme and will close that service there is no method to find the TC IP without owning your own domain. You would be better placing the TC in bridge behind a router that does offer dyndns and port forward AFP (TCP 548) to it.

  • Read-only access permissions for new files/folders?

    System:
    Clean Install on new intel Xserve
    10.4.8 Server w/ Open Directory
    Windows clients can read/write completely fine...
    Clients connecting using AFP (whether Standard or Kerberos authentication) can access files, but when new files/folders are created on the server, they register as full permissions for the user who created them, but not for the rest of the group.
    The share(s) in question are set using POSIX from WGM: Full access for owner/group/everyone (changed it to this thinking it would help, but it does not). Of course, no one can make changes to a newly-created/deposited files/folders, which is just plain silly.
    I can chmod the permissions recursively from a script (which fixes the problem, of course) on a regular basis so that its not (as much of) an issue, but there is still a 5-minute lag for the script to kick in, since we don't want to bombard the server with chmod requests every minute....which is unnecessary in the first place!
    I have plenty of other setups which are identical but have no such issue...
    Any reason why POSIX permissions on the share are being ignored from every user account?
    Thanks,
    k

    "That's default posix behaviour no matter what access permissions you set on the sharepoint."
    I'm afraid this is dead wrong. What matters most is how you set permissions on the share, not if you've chosen to inherit vs. using POSIX. POSIX is still used in inherit functions, though you can use ACL's to override them. In this case, ACL's are not being used on those shares (though we tried it).
    After all, why would Apple (let alone anyone else) even offer the ability to change POSIX permissions on a share if it didn't have any effect? That would be somewhat contradictory in nature.
    Like I said before, I have several other installations which are identically setup that have no such issues.
    As for Windows, it is also not set to inherit permissions; we're setting those explicitly. And they work fine.
    Any other ideas?
    Thanks,
    k

  • Apple mobile device support install/uninstall sets my wireless to limited access

    Dell Pavilion dv7
    Windows 7 64 bit.
    Current itunes 10.4
    When installing itunes 10.5, my wireless connection changed to limited access.  I can not connect to the internet with wireless.  If I put my ethernet cable in, i can connect to the internet through the ethernet cable.
    I found no solutions to fix the limited access issue.  So, i had to restore my system.  After the restore my wireless connection could connect to the internet again.
    But now itunes does not work.  One of two messages come up.  The latest (i have done several system restores).  Either quicktime was not found or something about iTunes Library.itl is out of synch with the current version of itunes.
    Now i decide to uninstall all the itunes installed products one at a time.  Itunes, quicktime, Apple software update, Apple mobile device support and there it goes, my wireless connection changes to limited access again.
    Any help would be great.

    Let's try a standalone Apple Mobile Device Support install. It still might not install, but fingers crossed any error messages will give us a better idea of the underlying cause of why it's not installing under normal conditions.
    Download and save a copy of the iTunesSetup.exe (or iTunes64setup.exe) installer file to your hard drive:
    http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
    Download and install the free trial version of WinRAR:
    http://www.rarlab.com/
    Right-click the iTunesSetup.exe (or iTunes64setup.exe), and select "Extract to iTunesSetup" (or "Extract to iTunes64Setup"). WinRAR will expand the contents of the file into a folder called "iTunesSetup" (or "iTunes64Setup").
    Go into the folder and doubleclick the AppleMobileDeviceSupport.msi (or AppleMobileDeviceSupport64.msi) to do a standalone AMDS install.
    (If it offers you the choice to remove or repair, choose "Remove", and if the uninstall goes through successfully, see if you can reinstall by doubleclicking the AppleMobileDeviceSupport.msi again.)
    Does it install (or uninstall and then reinstall) properly for you? If so, can you get a normal iTunes install to go through properly now?
    If instead you get an error message during the install (or uninstall), let us know what it says. (Precise text, please.)

  • Check in new documents in DMS with specific access permissions

    Hi,
    we have an RFC which creates new documents in DMS.
    This calls one after another these FBs:
    - CVAPI_DOC_CREATE
    - CVAPI_DOC_CHECKIN
    - BAPI_DOCUMENT_CHANGE2 for a additional classification of the new document
    Now we have a new request from our customer: to give the document specific access permissions.
    We try the following:
    - manually check in a document template with the necessary permissons.
    - the permissions are given in a classification  ("O,MW-T-D*,IB,02/03/52/53")
    - This is named "authority characteristic" and is checked somewhere else, I do not really know how this works in detail ( but it works)
    - check in a new document with a reference to the template and in expectation that the new document has the same classification and therefore the same access permissions
    - If I do this manually in CV03N is does work
    - We do this with CVAPI_CHECK_IN_WITH_TEMPLATE - but this FB does not copy the classification ( only the description and the attached original documents , and the documentnumber of the new document is an mandatory parameter which is not allowd in our case since we use internal creation of document numbers)
    My question is: Is this a possible way to create new documents with specific permissions
    Is there a possibility to give the permissions to the documenttype instead of give them to every single document of this documenttype ?
    Thanks
    Kerstin

    My guess is that at some point you propagated the ACL entry for "everyone deny delete" to all your folders and sub-folders and their contents by selecting Apply to All in a GetInfo window. Try doing a search in the Leopard forums for
    ACL chmod
    and you'll find a whole raft of discussions about the problem and suggestions for fixes.
    Francine
    Francine
    Schwieder

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do i configure an srw224p IGMP settings for an HMDI over IP pair?

    Hi, I have a minimal understanding of IGMP but am told I need to configure it properly when putting an HDMI over IP transceivers on my network. We have two SRW224P switches with 2 Gbit ports each, connected via fiber through fiber GBICs, one slot on

  • User Account File Sharing

    I've searched this forum to find my answer, but I'm shocked by what I've read, and although it makes sense, I can't believe OSX (10.4) has been set up this way and want to double check with you guys before I give up. I want to have two user accounts

  • Calls sound distorted and broken up?

    Hi, currently having the same fun and games as everyone else with there new N97's, but one thing i was really let down on was the sound quality when you were on a call. Every call i have made so far regardless of who i call or where i am, it sounds v

  • FYI. Verisign Cert & ACS

    for those who have troubles getting verisign cert working on the ACS box, i just spoke to a verisign tech support after facing issues with certs. He mentioned that when generating a CSR on ACS, it generates extra info that are not compatible with ver

  • No 'devices' tab when I try to sync my iPod!

    I plug my iPod 4th generation into my mac. It is charging, but it does not appear in my iTunes because there is NO 'devices' tab. Please help!