Limiting reported rogues

I'm running WCS ver 7.0.164 and the controllers are running 7.0.98 code.  I have a daily rogue report configured to email me the rogue access points reported by the controllers and access points.  How do I limit the reporting so that any rogue with a RSSI of less than -85 is not reported?  I created a "rogue ap rule" and set the match conditition to a minimum RSSI of -85.  Then I applied that to a "rogue ap rule group" and applied that to the controllers, but I still get the same number of rogues in my report.
Thanks,
Al

Post the rogue message you are getting for starters.
Also how is your rogue policies configured? Here is the users guide for configuring rogue policies using the templates.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/wcs/7.0/configuration/guide/7_0temp.html#wp1100222
You modify the rogue ap rules to prevent those rogues from appearing:
Viewing or Editing Rogue Access Point Rules
You can view or edit current rogue access point rules on a single WLC. Follow these steps to access the rogue access point rules. See the "Configuring a Rogue AP Rules Template" section on page 12-77 for more information.
Step 1 Choose Configure > Controllers.
Step 2 Click an IP address under the IP Address column.
Step 3 From the left sidebar menu, choose Security > Rogue AP Rules. The Rogue AP Rules displays the rogue access point rules, the rule types (malicious or friendly), and the rule sequence.
Step 4 Choose a Rogue AP Rule to view or edit its details.

Similar Messages

  • Approval Limits Report

    Hi,
    I am trying to create a report for giving the approval limits based on the organisation that employees work for however have hit a problem I think possibly with the way the data is set up in our organization but I can't seem to find a way around it. The report needs to display the employee (from per_all_people_f), their job (from per_jobs), their approval limit (from po_control_rules) and the name of the control group (from po_control_groups_all). You need to go through the table 'po_position_controls_all' in order to link per_jobs to po_control_rules and its this table I think which is causing the issue because of a one-many relationship between jobs and control groups.
    The below SQL:
    select PJ.JOB_ID, PJ.name, PPCA.CONTROL_GROUP_ID, PPCA.ORG_ID, PCR.AMOUNT_LIMIT, PCGA.CONTROL_GROUP_NAME, PCGA.ORG_ID
    from APPS.PER_JOBS PJ
    inner join APPS.PO_POSITION_CONTROLS_ALL PPCA on PPCA.JOB_ID = PJ.JOB_ID
    inner join APPS.PO_CONTROL_RULES PCR on PCR.CONTROL_GROUP_ID = PPCA.CONTROL_GROUP_ID
    inner join APPS.PO_CONTROL_GROUPS_ALL PCGA on PCGA.CONTROL_GROUP_ID = PPCA.CONTROL_GROUP_ID
    where 1=1
    and PJ.name = 'Job A'
    and PPCA.CONTROL_FUNCTION_ID = 1
    and PCR.OBJECT_CODE = 'DOCUMENT_TOTAL'
    and PCGA.ENABLED_FLAG = 'Y'
    Gives a result like this: (I have simplified the data and note that there are many jobs and UP TO 3 approval groups per job (as we have 3 organisations but there may be one or 2))
    JOB_ID | NAME | CONTROL_GROUP_ID | ORG_ID | AMOUNT_LIMIT | CONTROL_GROUP_NAME | ORG_ID_1
    1 | Job A | 11 | 1 | 100 | Approval Level 100 | 1
    1 | Job A | 12 | 2 | 200 | Approval Level 200 | 2
    1 | Job A | 13 | 3 | 300 | Approval Level 300 | 3
    Now I am guessing although haven't looked in to it yet that the way it works in the application when approving a PO it will see which org the PO is for (a column in the PO tables) so cross referencing that with the job id of the approver it will be able to get a single "amount limit" they can approve up to however in the report I don't have this context so if I have some employee data like this:
    Employee Name | JOB_ID | Who they approve PO's for (org)
    Bob | 1 | 1,2
    Paul | 1 | 1
    Harry | 1 | 3
    Terry | 1 | 2
    If i write a query for my report no matter what "org_id" I supply it (for PPCA or PCGA) it will always return all 4 employees, however I want to be able to get back that for org 1 Bob and Paul approve them (with a limit of 100) and for org 2 Bob and Terry approve (with a limit of 200) and for org 3 Harry approves (with a limit of 300)
    Edited by: pnj on 15-Nov-2012 07:17

    Hi pskumar, thanks for your reply. Unfortunately the orgnaization_id in per_all_assignments_f is populated by the business unit which the 3 different organisations are under. Basically (other than looking at a person's responsbilities which doesnt have an organization_id on either) there doesn't seem to be way of establishing who works for each organization. I've seen some trends, like their address, or their cost centre but it isn't accurate enough.
    Thanks

  • PPOMA Approval Limits - Report

    Hi All,
    Is it possible to report out on approval limits that are assigned to positions within PPOMA
    Thanks
    Neil

    Did you find the answer? because I have the same doubt.
    Thanks a lot and best regards, sapera

  • WLSE not reporting rogue AP

    Does anyone know of circumstances why WLSE (2.7) would not detect a non registered AP. We connected a non Cisco AP (Microsoft MN700 router/wireless base station) to our LAN yet WLSE is not sending out Faultnotifiers.It seems to be selectively ignoring at least this one particular type of AP because it has detected other rogue AP's.

    This can happen when Rogue AP was detected by APs whose locations were not specified or specified later than the detection.
    In Unknown Radio List Window, find out which access points were reporting the detection. Make sure you have placed them in a particular floor using Location Manager. If you have placed them later than the initial detection, turn on the Radio Monitoring for those reporting APs and wait for a while. When reporting APs detect the same Rogue AP again, it will correctly determine the possible location of the Rogue.

  • WCS Report - Rogues on Wired LAN

    Each WLC on our network shows "Rogues on Wired Network" from the Summary screen, however, checking these can be time consuming due to the number of WLC's in the network.
    All of the WLC's are connected to a WCS so I was wondering whether a report for "Rogues on Wired Network" is available on the WCS??
    I've spent a while looking around the WCS but can't find this information.
    Any help that would make checking this easier greatfully recevied...

    Unfortunately no. The feature works quite well only since WCS 6.0.
    If you have a WCS 4.1 you may be able to update to 5.2 or 6.0 as licensing should be the same. Check with your sales team.

  • WLSE Not showing the RSSI the AP reported Rogue APs in my scanning-only mod

    Hi guys
    I have a WLSE version 2.15.1 which is configured to detect Rogue AP, APs are 1242, when I see the Unknown AP detail the RSSI has a value of 0 for all Rogue AP detected any help or suggestions, I will be very useful.
    Thank you.
    Greetings

    If the RSSI value is zero, then the AP is not active at all. Do you see the same value for all the APs. Does the WLSE provide correct RSSI values for the known APs?

  • Rogue reporting in WCS

    Can anybody tell me what the difference is between the following 2 default Security reports:
    Rogue APs
    Rouge APs Event
    WE run both of these nightly, but the Rogue APs Event report usually is about 20 pages or so, and the information there has way more than what I see when I compare to my controller. The Rogue APs report usually matches what I see on my controller regarding current rogues. Does the Rogue APs Event report just detail everything that the access points have seen in the reporting time period? Some clarification on this would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you.

    Rogues Detected by APs Report displays information about specific rogue access points detected on the network, rather than having to look into each rogue alarm and manually assemble a list. The data that is returned includes but is not limited to the following: the name of the detecting access point, the MAC address of the rogue, and the location of the rogue.
    and Security Summary Report shows the number of association failures, rogues access points, ad hocs, and access point connections or disconnections over one month.

  • Report limits for individual tests

    Hi All
    I have a system under test which I interrogate (via RS232) for embedded hardware and firmware information. The reported response has to be added to the final test report along with all the other specified test cases.
    e.g.
    Operator:  xyz
    Date:  xyz
    UUT Type: xyz
    Serial Number: xyz
    PTS 2.1 Embedded H/W (Processor)  12345 version A  12345 version A
    PTS 2.1 Embedded H/W (Amplifier)    23456 version B  23456 version B
    PTS 2.1 Embedded H/W (Filter)         34567 version c  34567 version c
    PTS 2.1 Embedded H/W (Pre-Amp)   45678 version D  45678 version D
    PTS 2.2 12V OFF Current                  2.1mA  5  LT
    PTS 2.2 12V ON Current                   250mA  300  LT
    etc
    etc
    The only way I can think of to get the information into the main body of the report is to perform a 'String Value' test on it. However I then get the limits displayed in the report as well making the final report look messy. I do need all the limits in the report for the usual test cases e.g. voltages, currents etc so I cannot turn off limit reporting in the configuration  report options.
    Is there a way to turn OFF the limits reporting for individual test cases?
    Regards
    IanR

    What version of TestStand are you using?
    You could change the step to an 'Action' step and put the RS232 string in the report text for the step?  It depends on how your report options are setup in your environment.  Where I work, we do not put any Action steps in the report just Pass Fail results.  Hence you would have to change the Status Expression for your Action step to something other than "Done"....
    Otherwise in TestStand 4.0, you can click on the Property Browser view under the Properties Tab.  Right Click on the Limits container and select 'Advanced -> Edit Flags'
    Within that box there is an option 'Is Limit' checked, perhaps by unchecking this option it will not be put in the report.  Although I would NOT do this, because it is difficult for anyone taking over your code ( unless you document you changed this flag ) to see that it is unchecked.
    Thanks,
    Paul Holzrichter

  • Using AE(htmldb 2.0)  as for reporting tool for other oracle databases.

    Maybe I was mistaken, but when I first saw the HTMLDB demo's I saw this as a slick way to build a browser based reporting tool for the masses for quasi-ad-hoc reporting on some of our larger databases that currently have limited reporting capability, and also as a possible replacement for the many MSAccess applets we have.
    I just got 2.0 installed and working on a 9i database and went through the basic tutorials, but I can't find much info on how to connect to other oracle databases.
    Are my options as follows?:
    create dblinks from the local database that houses htmldb to all the other databases?
    or
    install htmldb schemas on each database I want to access from htmldb?
    or
    I'll keep looking, but if any of you have any pointers or know of a tutorial that explains the best way to do this it would be greatly appreciated!
    tia

    As for question 1, yep, that's what I mean. Example:
    In a schema in the App Express instance, create a user called "APP1_USER", and then
    create view app1_user.people as select * from people@link_user@remotedb
    As for the next question, using the built-in insert/update/delete processes will give you
    ORA-01461: can bind a LONG value only for insert into a LONG column
    among other errors. Apparently version 2.1 will fix this. See Cannot Update VARCHAR column in Remote DB
    We address this problem by creating pl/sql APIs for DML, and then writing our own insert/update processes. Slows us down a little, but even with that, App Express remains a productive choice for us.
    Another weird problem: auto-row fetch (built-in to HTML DB) doesn't work over db links when you have two columns for a primary key. Many ways around this, e.g. create sequence-populated primary key, create a view with single column that concatenates primary key column values (key1|key2)
    Hope this helps!
    -John

  • CALL FUNCTION SEND ERROR when displaying attendance report in PDF format.

    We implemented SSO/webgui.  The users did not have any issues with printing reports from SAPGUI.  In webgui, however, we had to define a Local PDF1 printer, per SAP Note  771683.  When users prints this report, it is generating 1-5 CALL_FUNCTION_SEND_ERROR.  We have Central Instance and 5 additional instances on 3 app servers.  Sometimes it generates 1 dumps, sometimes 2, etc.  The dump do not occurred on the instances you are logged into. The dump contains the following:
    ShrtText                                                      
        " " (I/O error)                                           
    What happened?                                                
        "CPIC-CALL: 'ThCMSEND'#connection closed#"                                                                               
    An error occurred when executing a Remote Function Call.    
    Error analysis                                                           
        An error occurred when executing a Remote Function Call.                                                                               
    "CPIC-CALL: 'ThCMSEND'#connection closed#"                                                                               
    Status of connection.... "CODE=CM_DEALLOCATED_NORMAL CM_SEND_RECEIVED
         CM_COMPLETE_DATA_RECEIVED SAPCODE=0 CONV=04892091"                  
        Internal error code.... "RFC_IO5"                                                                               
    There is an error in the communication system. To clarify            
        and resolve the error, contact your system administrator.                                                                               
    Transaktion......... " "                                                    
      Programm............ "SAPLSICM"                                             
      Dynpro.............. "SAPMSSY1 3004"                                        
      Dynprozeile......... 2                                                                               
    Informationen zum Aufrufer des Remote Function Calls (RFC):                 
      System.............. "HRP"                                                  
      Datenbank-Release... 640                                                    
      Kernel-Release...... 640                                                    
      Verbindungstyp...... 3 (2 = R/2, 3 = R/3, E = Extern, R = Reg. Extern)      
      Aufrufsart.......... "asynchron with reply (imode 0)" (S = Synchron, a/A =  
       Asynchron, T = Transakt. )                                                 
      Mandant............. 600                                                    
      Benutzer............ "CG1981"                                               
      Transaktion......... " (Program: SAPLSICM)"                                 
      Funktionsbaustein... "ICM_CACHE_UPLOAD"     
    Information on where terminated                                                                  
        The termination occurred in the ABAP program "SAPLSICM" in "ICM_CACHE_UPLOAD".               
        The main program was "SAPMSSY1 ".                                                                               
    The termination occurred in line 18 of the source code of the (Include)                      
         program "LSICMV11"                                                                               
    of the source code of program "LSICMV11" (when calling the editor 180).                      
    Source Code Extract                                                                               
    Line  SourceCde                                                                               
    1 *******************************************************************                        
        2 *   THIS FILE IS GENERATED BY THE FUNCTION LIBRARY               **                        
        3 *   NEVER CHANGE IT MANUALLY, PLEASE!                            **                        
        4 *******************************************************************                        
        5 FORM ICM_CACHE_UPLOAD %_RFC.                                                               
        6 * Parameter declaration                                                                    
        7 DATA URL TYPE                                                                               
    8 ICMURL                                                                               
    9 .                                                                               
    10 DATA DATA TYPE                                                                               
    11 ICMDATA                                                                               
    12 .                                                                               
    13 DATA GLOBAL LIKE                                                                               
    14 SY-INDEX                                                                               
    15 .                                                                               
    16 * Assign default values                                                                    
       17 * Call remote function                                                                     
    >>>>>   CALL FUNCTION 'ICM_CACHE_UPLOAD' %_RFC                                                   
       19      EXPORTING 
      20        URL = URL      
      21        DATA = DATA    
      22        GLOBAL = GLOBAL
      23   .                   
      24 ENDFORM.                                                                               
    We are on ERP 2004, kernel level 156, and Basis SP18.  I have Adobe Reader 8.
    Our CI Service Port is 8009.
    I have not seen any posting if there is a PDF limitation, e.g., width limitation, report contains rows highlighted in various colors.

    Dear Elaine,
    check notes
    <a href="https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/764734">764734</a>
    <a href="https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/688372">688372</a>
    or you might want to try to comment out line 118 of the function module
    ICM_CACHE_UPLOAD which reads like this
    PERFORMING RECEIVE_DATA_UPLOAD ON END OF TASK
    If this does not solve the problem, give a detailed description on how to reproduce the dump and put that into an error message with SAP. It should go to BC-CST-IC.
    Best Regards,
    Tim

  • Issue with Reports using costume measures - BPC 10.0 NW

    Hello BPC Colleagues,
    I’m having a problem with some BPC reports using costume measures and I would like to have your inputs about this issue.
    When all the reports are executed using a costume measures the report execution fails after a long time of execution (7min). The report has 1200 accounts and 57 company codes.
    In order to create trial balance we create these costume measure. Basically the measures are standars (with a few changes) and it works for limited reports (few account and companies) but we I try to executed for several accounts and companies I have the following error:
    “The execution of report Default Report failed. Please contact your administrator.”
    Error while communicating with the server
    Framework message:
    The underlying connection was close: An unexpected error occurred on a receive.
    Summary of the BPC LOG:
    |An error occurred while receiving the HTTP response to https://BPCENV.APPSET.MODEL. This could be due to the service endpoint binding not using the HTTP protocol. This could also be due to an HTTP request context being aborted by the server (possibly due to the service shutting down). See server logs for more details.#
    We already increased the PSAPTEMP table and this didn’t fix the issue. At the beginning we were sure that this was an issue with table space but the error persist.
    I don’t think (maybe I’m wrong) that this is not an issue related to the costume measure or to authorizations since I can retrieve data if I reduce the request to less accounts an company, so in my point of view this looks like a performance issue.
    Just for you, below you will find the details about our measure that generate the problem:
    'IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="INC",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%], [%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER), [MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
    IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="EXP",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%],[%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER),[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
    IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="AST",([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA],CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),
    IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="LEQ",([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA], CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]))))';SOLVE_ORDER=3
    Finally is important to mention that we are using BPC 10.0 NW (SP08)
    If you have any suggestion for me I will appreciate.
    Thanks you a lot!

    Hi Vadim,
    Once again, thanks for your help.
    We already modified the YTD standard measure but is with that measure that I have problem. Do you think that my new formula is not efficient and for that reason I’m having this problem? Is this correct?.
    Below you will find the standard and costume measure. In red I marked the difference between these 2 formulas:
    YEAR TO DATE CUSTOME MESURE:
    'IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="INC",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%], [%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER), [MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
    IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="EXP",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%],[%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER),[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
    IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="AST",([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA],CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),
    IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="LEQ",([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA], CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]))))';SOLVE_ORDER=3
    YEAR TO DATE STANDAR MEASURE:
    'IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="INC",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%], [%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER),-[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
    IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="EXP",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%],[%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER),[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
    IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="AST",([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA], CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),
    IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="LEQ",-([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA], CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),-[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]))))';SOLVE_ORDER=3
    If you have any suggestion to correct my formula I would really appreciate it.
    Regards,

  • Authorization to generate a report

    Dear all,
    In our environment, different Zenworks administrators have their permission to manage devices on the folder in device zone. How can I setup an authorization right for them to generate the limited report?? (only the device in the specify folder they can generate)
    Thanks

    cmnghellmann,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
    posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
    the other self support options and support programs available.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
    correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
    Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
    http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
    and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
    http://forums.novell.com/

  • WCS reporting issue

    When reporting on Rogues in WCS ( all versions ) using Reports > Rogue AP's , the report never lists any other types of AP other than ' malicious ' , even though ' friendly ' AP's exist
    Any one else had this issue ?

    The logic is why would you want to see your AP's classified as "friendly". As a (wireless) administrator, you are more concerend about AP's that are not friendly to you, i.e. Unclassified and Rogue.

  • Team Foundation Service Reporting (is it possible to point it to a BI Tool or excel?)

    Hi, I've read about TF Service and see that it has very limited reporting capabilities, but I have not been capable anything regarding pointing it to excel or a BI tool.
    My question is:
    would I have the ability to point it to a Bi tool or even Excel to the data cube to allow to run reporting?
    If you can please tell me or refer me to a web page where I can see that,  it would be great.
    Thanks in advance for your help,
    Jose

    hi Jose
    you're probably using the wrong forum as you're looking for TFS Service aka VisualStudio Online and not the on-premise TFS Server.
    for on-premise TFS server you can use this link
    Excel Reports
    currently VisualStudio Online does not have a cube and therefore the reporting is very limited and restricted to work item charting
    Visualize progress (work item charting)
    Please use Mark as Answer if my post solved your problem and use Vote As Helpful if a post was useful.

  • Floating point format in report

    I am using TestStand 3.1 and LabVIEW 7.1. I set the default report format for HTML report to _whatever_, %#5.13f, append trailing zeros etc, and this format is present for report entries such as limits. It is not present for the actual measured value, and this seems subject to some display format rounding. For instance, my limit test will be GELE and the lower limit will be 3.0000000000000. The measurement will be 2.956785434 and the test will fail, but in the report the measurement is formatted as 3.0. What has gone wrong?

    Hi Odd_Modem,
    Sorry for the crazy email. I accidentally replied when I was not ready.  
    Anyway, the third option was the Tree View. Once inside the tree, browse to Main >> Numeric Limit Test >> Result >> Numeric.  Right-click on the numeric field (in the right window) and select properties. Then select Numeric Format and change the significant digits.  This should fix your issue since this property is the highest precedence. The order of precedence is (Numeric in Tree View -> Limits -> Report options).
    Hope this helps!
    Best Regards,
    Jonathan N.
    National Instruments

Maybe you are looking for

  • Standard BAPI for creating groups in SAP using JAVA and JCO

    Hi, I have a requirement for creating user groups in SAP from java using JCO but i am unable to find the standard BAPI name to creating user groups. Can anyone let me know whats the bapi name for creating user groups in SAP? Thanks in advance, Ani

  • CPU Requirements for Oracle 10G Rel2 on RH Linux 3 (Linux x86)

    Hi, Can anyone tell me how to decide on the CPU (Speend and no. of CPUs) for Oracle 10G Rel2 on RH Linux 3 (Linux x86)? Thanks in Advance. Prachi

  • VIEW AND INDIRECT PRIVILEGES BY ROLE

    Good Evening, Is there a way to avoid error message "ORA-00942 table or view does not exist" during the creation of a view on another user's table with the SELECT ANY TABLE system privilege granted through a role ? Reading ORACLE's books it seem impo

  • Photopshop CS5 too long to save files

    Hi, My Config : CPU : i7 975 Extrem Memory : 6 Go ( 3 * 2 Go ) DDR3 1333 Silicon Power HDD : Velociraptor 150 Go 10.000 rpm Mothercard : Gigabyte X58A-UD3R GC : Sapphire HD5750 Issue : When I save my file in PSD, JPG or anything else this take soooo

  • How to properly size Coherence? (3.6)

    My Customer needs to setup a new Coherence environment and needs to understand the sizing that of the systems in term of CPU and memory. Is there any tool that can help? Thank you Chiara