Line Attenuation - New Install
Hi there,
I had a new BT line installed last week into a new build house and BT Total Broadband Option 3 activated today. While checking out my connection details I noted the following information from the router:
Downstream: 1 Mbps
Upstream: 448 Kbps
Modulation:G.992.1 Annex A
Latency type:Fast
Noise margin (Down/Up):3.2 dB / 12.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up):66.6 dB / 31.5 dB
Output power (Down/Up):15.7 dBm / 12.5 dBm
CRC Events (Down/Up):1087 / 33
HEC Events (Down/Up):512 / 1
Error Seconds (Local/Remote):682 / 34
The Line attenuation worried me the most as when placing the order with BT, they estimated I should be able to receive 13 Mbps, not the current 1 Mbps I have.
I understand that the BT line needs to "Sit" for 10 days, but surely the line attenuation isn't going to suddenly drop and give me the speed that was advertised?
The exchange is over 5km away, but has been enabled for FTTC and the nearest street cabinet is just around the corner from the house.
I'm wondering if the engineer connected the new line directly to the exchange rather than the street cabinet. (Unless I'm mistake on how they can connect a new line).
Can anything be done? I'm going to give tech support a ring tomorrow, but wanted to ask here in the meantime.
Thanks for your patience.
Thanks for the reply.
The checker came back with the following results:
"For Telephone Number 028******** on Exchange WARINGSTOWN
Your exchange is ADSL enabled, and our initial test on your line indicates that your line should be able to have an ADSL broadband service that provides a fixed line speed up to 512Kbps.
However, due to the length of your line, an engineer visit may be required, who will, where possible, supply the broadband service.
Our test also indicates that your line currently supports a fibre technology with an estimated WBC FTTC Broadband where consumers have received downstream line speed of 13.8Mbps and upstream line speed of 4.6Mbps."
So Fibre is available, so I'm confused why I seem to be only getting 1Mbps with such an awful Attenuation rate.
I'll e-mail the mods as suggested, is there anything I can do if I speak to BT today? (I really want to get this moving if another engineer is required as it took nearly 2 months notice to book one last time)
Thanks
Similar Messages
-
Hi there,
I've got BT Infinity being installed on 2nd December, and there seems to be some conflicting information. I was hoping for some clarification, when I put my postcode into the checker my house name came up and the old address which was 22a came up as well.
My estimated speed for my address using the house name was 24meg down and 4meg up, when I used the number it said 35 down and 10 up.
They won't cap my speed just because the house name has changed will they? It must be an error as the two houses either side of me say 35/10.
I guess I'll find out when they install but just wanted to ask incase anyone else had a similar thing?
Thanks
Henry
Solved!
Go to Solution.Post code checking is just a guestimate. The only accurate check is the telephone number check.
You will get the best available speed that your line can take.
You say the two houses either side of you show 35/10, so I would imagine you should be very similar, but that is not guaranteed as someone could have bad internal wiring/bad joints outside/next door could go to a different cabinet/exchange/line could be routed a different way.
toekneem
http://www.no2nuisancecalls.net
(EASBF) -
I realize this topic has been kind of beat to death, but I'm not finding exactly the information I'm searching for. There is a lot of information about splitting libraries, but I want to do a new install, and have my media located on a separate drive, with nothing but the software on the C drive.
I have a pretty massive music library (noting new or special about that), so an new install of iTunes is always a huge chore. Like many other users in posts I've read with similar questions, my C drive is SSD (also have another dedicated to something else entirely), and so I have purchased a standard spinning drive to handle my iTunes media, and externals for everything that isn't meant for iTunes. Basically, I need the library database to be located on my 'E' drive (let's say), and I will move most of my files manually. I just need iTunes to find them after doing so, and then I'll simply resync my iPhone to the new setup. I have a few reservations about that, but that is a different topic.Right now, I just need to get iTunes installed and have it recognize/find media on a separate drive. Also, I'm running Windows 7, 64-bit, in case that is relavant.
Sorry if there are a million thread with the same info, but all I was finding was how to split the library, and that's not at all what I want to achieve. Thanks in advance!hello again Chris - I hope you're able to help, or someone as knowledgeable.
I've started another discussion because installing this newest version of iTunes has caused problems like I've never encountered.
- I did a fresh install as I intended (new PC running Win 7 64-bit). Installation is smooth, and opens fine. Then I create the new library on "I" drive, iTunes then stalls when opening. I just tried this again, and it has been unresponsive for ~10 min, not fully open.
- I see the new library just fine when I peek in the "I"drive.
- In a previous attempt, I used an existing library file, iTunes still stalls, though it loaded the content. It just freezes when I enter the store. The content loaded fine. Still, couldn't access new material or materials I've purchased and won't download after installing and trying to access iTunes store.
-each time I try, I unstall every connected program to iTunes, even removing items from registry.
I'm seriously perplexed. I've been using iTunes since 2005 and have never had any kind of issue like this. this PC is a gaming rig. Top of the line components all the way. I even cancled overclock settings to make sure that wasn't the culprit. Still no joy. I had iTunes installed on this machine about 3 months back, but since "C" drive is SSD, I uninstalled until I recently purchased a standard HD specifically for media content. While writing this, it just brough up the tutorial. I click an option (iTunes in the Cloud) just to see if it moves ahead. It does nothing. I have to minimize the browser to access. Apple no longer offers support - they want me to pay to help with free software for which I've already spent loads of money on for content. This is absolutely insane. What has changed in the last few months to make this software behave this way? Previous versions HAVE worked on this machine. I simply couldn't contain the library on my drive. No help was offed on my other post. I'm desparate at this point. Please. Someone from the community or Apple help me. I've got literally several thousands of dollars of media that I cannot access on my PC. ****, the OS is lean and I barely have any software installed. This makes no sense at all. Sorry that I'm all over the place. I've been working for hours on a problem with BitCoin miners on another machine and combine with iTunes (which should be simple compared to the DIY component of mining hardware and software...which I'm actually able to solve!!!), and I'm fried and defeated. need sleep. Thanks in advance. -
Outlook 2010 - Subject line of new e-mail changes to duplicate the subject of the e-mail below
I'm having the strangest issue with a new install of Outlook 2010. Sometimes when I receive a new e-mail, the from, subject, received, and size fields will duplicate the information from the e-mail below it. In other words, no matter what the sender, subject,
time, etc. actually is, it will display in the inbox the same as the e-mail below it. Once I open it, it will list correctly in the inbox, or I can click on another folder and return to the inbox to see it correctly displayed.
I do not have any kind of preview on, and the inbox only displays one line. There is no pattern to which e-mails this happens to.
Any ideas?Please run /cleanviews switch to check the result.
(Type "Outlook.exe /cleanviews in Windows search bar and press ENTER.)
Please also create a new Outlook profile to check if the issue still persists. Thanks.
Tony Chen
TechNet Community Support -
Why does my line attenuation change all the time?
Why would my line attenuation have gone from 65dB to 72.3dB? I think there is a bad connection on my line, but BT's test equipment says my line is fine.
1st ADSL Line Status
Connection Information
Line state:
Connected
Connection time:
0 days, 00:52:21
Downstream:
1.372 Mbps
Upstream:
659.6 Kbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI:
0/38
Type:
PPPoA
Modulation:
G.992.5 Annex A
Latency type:
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up):
6.2 dB / 5.8 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up):
65.0 dB / 43.9 dB
Output power (Down/Up):
15.0 dBm / 12.4 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up):
113157 / 9145
CRC Events (Down/Up):
421 / 240
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
HEC Events (Down/Up):
1850 / 810
Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
169 / 215
2nd ADSL Line Status
Line state
Connected
Connection time
2 days, 12:34:52
Downstream
928 Kbps
Upstream
446 Kbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI
0/38
Type
PPPoA
Modulation
G.992.5 Annex A
Latency type
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up)
6.2 dB / 11.9 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up)
72.3 dB / 44.0 dB
Output power (Down/Up)
1.4 dBm / 0.8 dBm
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote)
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote)
0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote)
0 / 0
FEC Errors (Down/Up)
5666 / 0
CRC Errors (Down/Up)
442 / 0
HEC Errors (Down/Up)
2257 / 0
Error Seconds (Local/Remote)
87 / 0I got a reply from the chairmans office
I’ve spoken with BT
Wholesale again today and I’m waiting on a report coming in from the Chief
Engineers Office.
What I’ve
been doing
I’ve also gone
through all the history available of the work that has been done on your line
and can confirm the following:
Your line is
all copper and is on the best E and D side cables available.
We have changed
the network equipment in the exchange on multiple occasions.
And it doesn’t
look like there is any more physical work can be carried out.
The report I’m
waiting for from BT Wholesale is about a known issue that we have had with
certain exchange equipment which is used to make the phone ring when it is
being called and causing the broadband connections to drop, I need this to
confirm if your line is affected by this specific issue.
I think you
have spoke with Donal earlier today and discussed the option of moving onto an
8meg service instead of the upto 20meg, and you told him this has been tried
before and did not work, can you remember roughly when this was so I can check
it with BT Wholesale?
What happens
next
There is still
an engineer on his way out to you tomorrow between 1pm and 6pm. I’m not sure
what this engineer will be able to do given that we have had it confirmed that
you are already on the best lines available but we will see how he gets on and
take it from there. (Might get a nice surprise!)
I’ll give you a
call tomorrow to confirm the update from the chief engineers office and also
see if the engineer has been out on site with you.
Best Wishes
Chris
My reply
Hi,
Thanks for the reply, some of the information in your email isn’t correct.
The D-side is only the “best lines available” because it’s the only one available!
I had the BB disconnecting when the phone rang, long before going on the new equipment.
They have exchanged the network equipment on “multiple occasions”, even though I told them not to bother because I knew it would make no difference.
The facts are:
NO WORK has been done on my D-side (apart from the connections directly outside my property)
Many people that have had the same fault have told me it turned out to be the D-side
I was told by a BT Openreach engineer that they would not do any work on my D-side because part of it was aluminium. But this now turns out not to be true, so I have no idea why they will not do any work on my D-side.
At the cab, the broadband is the correct speed and works fine.
My caller display, often doesn't work. I think this is the same line fault that causes this.
A leakage to earth was detected on my line, but was never fixed.
My phone often rings 2 or 3 times, when I finish a call. I think this is the same line fault that causes this.
When the BB speed goes up, the router records a huge amount of errors.
A few years ago my BB failed altogether, it turned out to be the connection outside my property. The connection was green and in bad condition. There are loads more of these connections between my house and the cab, they will be just as old or older.
A BT engineers test equipment detected a change in resistance somewhere on my D-side, I haven’t heard if that was ever looked into.
Every piece of evidence points at a bad connection on my D-side, so you can see why I will not rest until I know that all the connections have been replaced. BT wholesales answer of “that there is nothing wrong with your line” just isn’t good enough because the fault still exists. -
Is there going to be new install media soon?
Seems like they're releasing one every month now? I'm going to reinstall soon and I'm just wondering if a new install disc is coming soon I would wait.
Woops should have checked the download page.
http://www.archlinux.org/download/
Is this one final? Karol said there were some last minute issues. Anything I need to watch out for? I may just give it a go tonight if this ISO is good.
EDIT: I know I could just pacman -Syu but at the moment I don't even have Arch installed on my computer. I dual boot Windows 7 and Linux. A couple months back I decided to try out Xubuntu but ended up not using it too much. Main reason for wanted to switch back to Arch is for Pacman. Apt just kind of frustrates me and lacks the simplicity and the "it just works" feeling of Pacman. For example, for whatever reason when doing a simple check for updates it returns like 20 or 30 lines downloading all these different files just to CHECK if there's updates. With Pacman, it just downloads "core", "extra", "community", then it's done. So much simpler and faster.
Last edited by weirddan455 (2012-10-07 02:21:47) -
[SOLVED] iptables - New install, existing conf
I copied my /etc/iptables/iptables.rules to my new install but the rules arn't being read.
[root@host ~]# iptables -nvL
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 76 packets, 5793 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 68 packets, 8988 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
GNU nano 2.2.6 File: /etc/conf.d/iptables
# Configuration for iptables rules
IPTABLES_CONF=/etc/iptables/iptables.rules
IP6TABLES_CONF=/etc/iptables/ip6tables.rules
First few lines of my rules file...
GNU nano 2.2.6 File: /etc/iptables/iptables.rules
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.12.1 on Tue Sep 20 08:26:18 2011
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [40:5840]
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
I've rebooted a few times since and restarted the iptables service but still no joy. Any ideas?
Last edited by Swarfega (2013-02-06 20:13:30)Well not sure if you meant to, but the loaded rules are technically identical to your rules file. You forgot to change:
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
to
:INPUT DROP [0:0]
Could just be that netfilter is being smart and leaves out "extra" rules. -
Many invalid objects found after new install the R12 vision demo (12.1.1)
In AIX Server,
I found many invalid objects after new install the R12 vision demo (12.1.1) with DB v11.1.0.7, can I drop the following invalid objects then upgrade to R12.1.3 ?
OWNER OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_TYPE STATUS
APPS XLA_00707_AAD_C_000026_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS XLA_00200_AAD_C_000017_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS XLA_00200_AAD_C_000016_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS XLA_00200_AAD_S_000032_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS XLA_00200_AAD_S_000034_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS XLA_00200_AAD_S_000039_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS XLA_00200_AAD_S_000041_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS XLA_00200_AAD_C_000020_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
RE RE_PROFILER PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS XLA_00200_AAD_C_000018_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS XLA_00200_AAD_C_000021_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS XLA_00555_AAD_S_000014_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS XLA_00555_AAD_C_000015_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS XLA_00200_AAD_C_000022_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS XLA_00140_AAD_S_000036_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS FSAH_DUPLICATE_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS XLA_00707_AAD_C_000044_PKG PACKAGE BODY INVALID
APPS MSD_DEM_OBI_DEMANTRA_MV MATERIALIZED VIEW INVALID
18 rows selected.
SQL> alter package XLA_00707_AAD_C_000026_PKG compile body;
Warning: Package Body altered with compilation errors.
SQL> show error
Errors for PACKAGE BODY XLA_00707_AAD_C_000026_PKG:
LINE/COL ERROR
1/49 PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "end-of-file" when expecting one of the following:
is as compress compiled wrapped
The symbol "compress" was substituted for "end-of-file" to continue.
SQL> alter package RE.RE_PROFILER compile body;
Warning: Package Body altered with compilation errors.
SQL> show error
Errors for PACKAGE BODY RE.RE_PROFILER:
LINE/COL ERROR
1180/13 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
1180/13 PLS-00435: DML statement without BULK In-BIND cannot be used inside FORALL
1181/32 PLS-00440: FORALL bulk IN-bind variables cannot be used here
1926/9 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
1926/9 PLS-00435: DML statement without BULK In-BIND cannot be used inside FORALL
SQL> alter package FSAH_DUPLICATE_PKG compile body;
Warning: Package Body altered with compilation errors.
SQL> show error
Errors for PACKAGE BODY FSAH_DUPLICATE_PKG:
LINE/COL ERROR
7/12 PLS-00341: declaration of cursor 'C1' is incomplete or malformed
8/7 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
9/14 PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
12/17 PL/SQL: Item ignored
16/7 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
16/71 PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
22/13 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
22/27 PLS-00320: the declaration of the type of this expression is incomplete or malformed
Edited by: SamCH on 2013年2月4日 下午11:19Hi Hussein,
Thanks for your reply again, the compile error as below
e.g.
show error
SQL> ALTER PACKAGE APPS.XLA_00707_AAD_C_000026_PKG COMPILE BODY;
Warning: Package Body altered with compilation errors.
SQL> show error
Errors for PACKAGE BODY APPS.XLA_00707_AAD_C_000026_PKG:
LINE/COL ERROR
1/49 PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "end-of-file" when expecting one of the following:
is as compress compiled wrapped
The symbol "compress" was substituted for "end-of-file" to continue.
SQL> ALTER PACKAGE APPS.XLA_00200_AAD_C_000017_PKG COMPILE BODY;
Warning: Package Body altered with compilation errors.
SQL> show error
Errors for PACKAGE BODY APPS.XLA_00200_AAD_C_000017_PKG:
LINE/COL ERROR
131072/2 PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "end-of-file" when expecting
one of the following:
( begin case declare end exit for goto if loop mod null
pragma raise return select update while with <an identifier>
<a double-quoted delimited-identifier> <a bind variable> <<
continue close current delete fetch lock insert open rollback
savepoint set sql execute commit forall merge pipe purge
SQL> ALTER PACKAGE APPS.XLA_00200_AAD_S_000032_PKG COMPILE BODY;
Warning: Package Body altered with compilation errors.
SQL> show error
Errors for PACKAGE BODY APPS.XLA_00200_AAD_S_000032_PKG:
LINE/COL ERROR
131072/7 PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "end-of-file" when expecting
2 one of the following:
. ( ) , * % & = - + < / > at in is mod remainder not rem
<an exponent (**)> <> or != or ~= >= <= <> and or like like2
like4 likec between || multiset member submultiset
SQL> ALTER PACKAGE RE.RE_PROFILER COMPILE BODY;
Warning: Package Body altered with compilation errors.
SQL> show error
Errors for PACKAGE BODY RE.RE_PROFILER:
LINE/COL ERROR
1180/13 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
1180/13 PLS-00435: DML statement without BULK In-BIND cannot be used inside FORALL
1181/32 PLS-00440: FORALL bulk IN-bind variables cannot be used here
1926/9 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
1926/9 PLS-00435: DML statement without BULK In-BIND cannot be used inside FORALL
SQL> ALTER PACKAGE APPS.XLA_00555_AAD_S_000014_PKG COMPILE BODY;
Warning: Package Body altered with compilation errors.
SQL> show error
Errors for PACKAGE BODY APPS.XLA_00555_AAD_S_000014_PKG:
LINE/COL ERROR
131072/5 PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "end-of-file" when expecting
7 one of the following:
begin function pragma procedure subtype type <an identifier>
<a double-quoted delimited-identifier> current cursor delete exists prior
SQL> ALTER PACKAGE APPS.FSAH_DUPLICATE_PKG COMPILE BODY;
Warning: Package Body altered with compilation errors.
SQL> show error
Errors for PACKAGE BODY APPS.FSAH_DUPLICATE_PKG:
LINE/COL ERROR
7/12 PLS-00341: declaration of cursor 'C1' is incomplete or malformed
8/7 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
9/14 PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
12/17 PL/SQL: Item ignored
16/7 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
16/71 PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
22/13 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
22/27 PLS-00320: the declaration of the type of this expression is incomplete or malformed
SQL> ALTER PACKAGE APPS.XLA_00707_AAD_C_000044_PKG COMPILE BODY;
Warning: Package Body altered with compilation errors.
SQL> show error
Errors for PACKAGE BODY APPS.XLA_00707_AAD_C_000044_PKG:
LINE/COL ERROR
201713/1 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
201826/1 PL/SQL: ORA-00904: "CST_XLA_INV_REF_V"."TRANSACTION_SOURCE_ID":
30 invalid identifier
202147/1 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
202191/1 PL/SQL: ORA-00904: "CST_XLA_INV_REF_V"."TRANSACTION_SOURCE_ID":
30 invalid identifier
202973/5 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
202973/2 PLS-00364: loop index variable 'HEADER_RECORD' use is invalid
7
SQL> ALTER PACKAGE APPS.POS_AP_SUPPLIER_BO_PKG COMPILE BODY;
Warning: Package Body altered with compilation errors.
SQL> show error
Errors for PACKAGE BODY APPS.POS_AP_SUPPLIER_BO_PKG:
LINE/COL ERROR
0/0 PL/SQL: Compilation unit analysis terminated
1/14 PLS-00304: cannot compile body of 'POS_AP_SUPPLIER_BO_PKG' without its specification
1/14 PLS-00905: object APPS.POS_AP_SUPPLIER_BO_PKG is invalid
SQL> ALTER PACKAGE APPS.POS_AP_SUPPLIER_BO_PKG COMPILE ;
Warning: Package altered with compilation errors.
SQL> show error
Errors for PACKAGE APPS.POS_AP_SUPPLIER_BO_PKG:
LINE/COL ERROR
3/3 PL/SQL: Declaration ignored
7/32 PLS-00201: identifier 'POS_AP_SUPPLIER_BO' must be declared
28/3 PL/SQL: Declaration ignored
35/40 PLS-00201: identifier 'POS_AP_SUPPLIER_BO' must be declared
SQL> ALTER PACKAGE APPS.POS_BANK_ACCOUNT_BO_PKG COMPILE BODY;
Warning: Package Body altered with compilation errors.
SQL> show error
Errors for PACKAGE BODY APPS.POS_BANK_ACCOUNT_BO_PKG:
LINE/COL ERROR
0/0 PL/SQL: Compilation unit analysis terminated
1/14 PLS-00304: cannot compile body of 'POS_BANK_ACCOUNT_BO_PKG' without its specification
1/14 PLS-00905: object APPS.POS_BANK_ACCOUNT_BO_PKG is invalid
SQL> ALTER PACKAGE APPS.POS_BANK_ACCOUNT_BO_PKG COMPILE ;
Warning: Package altered with compilation errors.
SQL> show error
Errors for PACKAGE APPS.POS_BANK_ACCOUNT_BO_PKG:
LINE/COL ERROR
4/6 PL/SQL: Declaration ignored
9/80 PLS-00201: identifier 'POS_BANK_ACCOUNT_BO_TBL' must be declared
13/5 PL/SQL: Declaration ignored
19/69 PLS-00201: identifier 'POS_BANK_ACCOUNT_BO_TBL' must be declared -
New Install Win 2000 Server ORA-12560 : TNS : Protocol Adapter Error
I am trying to learn Oracle.
I get the following when logging into SQL*Plus.
ORA-12560 : TNS : Protocol Adapter Error
I have just installed New Install Win 2000 Server and then Oracle 8i for Win2k
nullStep 1 - from a command line on the database machine, enter 'lsnrctl status' and report the output
Step 2 - display the contents of the %ORACLE_HOME%\network\admin\tnsnames.ora file on the machine running sqlplus.
These are the first two stepo, whether on the database machine or in a traditional client-server configuration. -
Can't log in to wifi on my new install
I connect to a hidden WiFi network, and I was able to do this successfully on the Arch live USB with netctl, by creating a netctl profile and uncommenting the line about a hidden network. Yet in my new install, I can't connect to WiFi. Trying `netctl start myprofile` gives: "Job for [email protected] failed." and refers me to `journalctl -xn`. When I type that command, I see the error "Failed to bring the network up for profile `myprofile`. What could be going wrong, and how can I fix it?
I made sure to install the `iw` and `wpa_supplicant` packages while chrooted into my new install.Do you have wpa_supplicant installed? You should carefully compare the installed packages list between on you live version and local version. Then find the missing package and boot from live-usb version and using chroot to install it.
-
New install, Deskjet K8600
Trying to install - goes to 96% and fails. I believe there is something wrong with the carriage and that 96% is the configuration part. I cannot get the printheads to move to the center (someone else installed the printheads and ink cartridges). When trying to print, I get the same page everytime. a very fine blue vertical line, a thicker pinkish vertical line and three letter N's, all same pinkish color. I am trying to return it to the vendor for replacement, although the box has been thrown out. Any suggestions? Thank you. Jonilyn
Originally Posted by fdgoings
New install 3.5.0.144.
Server install completed. SQL, ZES and management console all to run on the same W2k3 server. Getting error during AD discovery on the management console. See attached error screenshot... Have plenty of disk space... Not sure what it means by "not enough server storage is available".
Possibly I should not be using the domain for the second one?? "Select authenticating domains for this configuration"??
Please uninstall the SSI and MC and run version 3.5.154. The 3.5.144 version had an AD sync bug. -
Post Moved Infinity-New-install-today
Post moved to Inifinity Board http://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Infinity/Infinity-New-install-today/td-p/682502
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’Contact the mods or speak to BT, only in extreme cases they will deal within the first 10 days but to me it's very clear something is wrong with your line.
If this helped you please click the Star beside my name.
If this answered your question please click "Mark as Accepted Solution" below. -
I know this is an old problem and I have work it out before but I am stumped this time.
I am running Oracle 11r2.0.3 using the built in HTTP server, and I have downloaded and installed 4.1.1. This is a new install. on a Windows 2008r2. Everything is 64bit.
I am getting the 'apex' not defind error. I tried the apxldimg.sql, I get errors on this:
ORA-22288: file or LOB operation FILEOPEN failed
The system cannot find the path specified
ORA-06512: at "SYS.XMLTYPE", line 296
ORA-06512: at line 15
One other thing I see is it wants to use "/" as the directory seperator, but on windows it is "\",, i wish they would let me use Linux and not windows!
All help is welcome!
http://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=42248:1:
MerphSQL> @apxldimg d:\oracle\product\11.2.0\db_home1
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
old 1: create directory APEX_IMAGES as '&1/apex/images'
new 1: create directory APEX_IMAGES as 'd:\oracle\product\11.2.0\db_home1/apex/images'
Directory created.
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-22288: file or LOB operation FILEOPEN failed
The system cannot find the path specified.
ORA-06512: at "SYS.XMLTYPE", line 296
ORA-06512: at line 15
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Commit complete.
timing for: Load Images
Elapsed: 00:00:07.58
Directory dropped.
SQL> spool off
Merph
http://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=42248 -
Hi
I am a new broadband customer.
I think the SNR and Line Attenuation are at the limits of what is acceptable. Please could you advise if there is anything that can be done to improve these.
Downstream
Upstream
SNR Margin
6.5
23.0
db
Line Attenuation
50.5
29.5
db
Data Rate
5664
448
kbps
Max Rate
6112
1112
kbps
POWER
19.5
12.0
dbm
CRC
633
2there is nothing wrong with the stats you posted. attenuation is dependent on your line length from the exchange so will fluctuate 1 amybe 2db but unless you move it should be pretty constant your noise margin ( it is snrm shown by router) is about the normal of 6db
you actually have a good connection speed for your attenuation check here
check speed
If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’. -
I am having a problem with a new install of arch. The boot goes normally showing all the text as the kernel starts up and stuff but then then stops at the line
[<c140b0d7>] i386_start_kernel +0xd7/0xdf19f/0x74/0x50 #1sk!c13c7f441 0f 84 cc
I really don't know why it's hanging. If anyone can help I would really appreciate it.
Tim
Last edited by tpolich (2010-06-25 01:38:19)If you haven't put too much work into your install yet, I would just reinstall. You can also boot into a live cd, chroot, and reinstall the kernel (pacman -S kernel26).
Maybe you are looking for
-
Oracle 9.0.1 + Linux w/generic conectivity
I'm currently migrating from a Ora8i+WinNT4 to a Ora9i+RH Linux 9. All the database is OK on the linux side. I have added the listener entry: (SID_DESC = (SID_NAME = NETFINITY) (ORACLE_HOME = /opt/ora9/product/9.2/) (PROGRAM = hsodbc) (SID_DESC = (SI
-
Photoshop CS5 Extended crashing on Windows Vista.
I've just installed Photoshop on my system. My video drivers and everything are up to date. Video card is NVidia GeForce 7050/ nForce 620i and it shows as compatible on the Photoshop tested cards list. Photoshop CS5 Extended opens fine and dandy. But
-
I need a bit of theory: How are connections to the db created
Hi I need network / docs resources to explain how connections to the oracle are made. Strangly enogh I can find it nowhere! Thanx in advance Paul
-
I just got a new MacBook and I was trying to trasfer my photos from my old (like 2007) classic iPod to the MacBook. I have the iPod set to the disc use thing and I can see all the pictures on my iPod. When I connect the iPod and try and transfer phot
-
MacBookPro with unsupported Superdrive for iDVD?
Q. Why would a MacBookPro have an unsupported Superdrive for iDVD? A. If it's a MacBookPro, it shouldn't. Yet that's the error message that comes up when iDVD is opened. We've only used the burner for CDs so far . . . Q. What do you see about your di