Line Cards support for SupEngine 7

Hi,
I would like to upgrade my 4507 core switch which currently has Sup IV to Sup7.
the core switch currently has classic line cards WS-x4506-GB-T and WS-x4224-RJ45V and my worry is these May not be supported..
The datasheet list these as part of the supported classic cards but I would wish to get a confirmation that this is indeed so and what issues I should expect? please advise...
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Line cards shouldn't be an issue.  (Don't recall us bumping into any line cards issues with the sup7.)
You may need to upgrade your chassis, though.

Similar Messages

  • Why XL line cards required for OTV?

    According to Cisco's website, there are specific types of line cards required to support OTV on N7K (N7K-8 port 10GbE with XL options, or N7K-48 port 10/100/1000 Module with XL option).
    Q1: Do I have to use the physical ports on those line cards to make OTV related interfaces? Can I use logical interfaces, and use physical ports on those line cards for non-OTV connectivity, such as used as a layer 2 access port?
    Q2: Since OTV feature is enabled globally, why the requirements for specific line cards in the first place? What the features/services provided by the line cards for OTV operations?
    Thanks.

    Has anyone seen design docs that suggest using 10-Gig ports for the OTV interfaces? I know the Q&A indicates support for all M1 line cards (not F1 or F2), but I'm wondering if there's any clearly defined design reason for not using the 1-G line cards for this (such as the N7K-M148GS-11L). 
    I'm basically asking if it would be recommended (for a system with no additional open 10-G ports) to purchase another 10-G blade (such as the N7K-M108X2-12L at $27), or could we do the job with spare ports on an existing 1-G card?  I've been through several docs, and while none of them indicate 10-G connectivity is mandatory, I'm hoping for a reason why Cisco might be pushing/recommending this for any size of OTV deployment.
    Thank you.

  • GE cards supported for port- vlan based EoMPLS on 7600/sup720

    Hi,
    Can anyone explain/point where I can find de proper documentation where I can find the support for port- vlan based EoMPLS support cards on a 7600 with a sup720 engine on the CCO site ?
    WHich GE port cards are supporting EoMPLS and which GE cards will support it not.

    try
    www.cisco.com/go/fn
    -Waris

  • SDXC card support for cRIO 9031 Linux Real Time

    The cRIO9031 with Linux Real Time did not support SDXC cards. Only SDGC with a maximum of 32GB supported by cRIO.
    For logging application their is a need for more than 32GB => use of SDXC cards with 128/256 GB
     

    Hi Schott,
    Unfortunately, Linux does not have native (in kernel source) support for the exFAT filesystem (required for a device to be labled SDXC). As soon as such a filesystem is supported in Linux, we can enable direct support for exFAT.
    In the meantime, there is nothing preventing you from formatting the card in a filesystem type that is supported on the target. FAT32 is unfortunately the most portable, accessible format, of course if you don't need to access the contents of the card from a Windows machine, you can use some of the tools on the RT controller to format the card in a more robust, journalling filesystem such as EXT4.

  • Multiple line voltage support for iMac

    I see from the tech specs that the 2010 iMacs support line voltages from 100v to 240v. I'm thinking of buying one soon in CA, but may be moving to Germany later this year. Can someone confirm that the iMac power supply supports 110v and 220v?

    Good luck...for a North American, Europe is a great place to live, at least for a time...the difference in distances from place to place after NA is something. Go from Paris to Heidleberg for a day...quick and easy highway system...no speed limit on the AutoBahn between cities...great beer and wine and sausage, etc.
    And the history you can see. Living there vs visiting makes all the difference in the world.

  • Is this card supported for 3d ray tracing optimized with CUDA?

    On the system requirements list for after effects CS6, the 660 is not listed, but I just wanted to double check. According to nvidia's website the 660 supports CUDA optimized functions. There is also the fact that sometimes softwares fail to keep up to date with what hardware works. Is this one of those case?

    For a list of supported hardware acceleration cards start at  http://forums.adobe.com/thread/773101 and click the system requirements link
    Most nVidia cards that are not in the list may be used for hardware MPE if they have at least 1Gig of video ram, by means of the hack http://forums.adobe.com/thread/629557

  • BCM43227 Wlan Card Support for x230t?

    Hi, everyone. I have a thinkpad x230t and recently changed my OS so I need to replace my WLAN card because there's no driver for intel cards.
    I checked Lenovo documents, here http://download.lenovo.com/parts/ThinkPad/x230t_fru_bom_20140421.pdf
    it says BCM43227 card with FRU number 03T9015 is supported so I made my purchase online. But upon boot on it gives me 1802 error saying it's not a proved card.
    The BCM43227 card I have has ID/DEV numbers: 14E4/4358/14E4/0543. I assume it's the same card mentioned in the pdf. I have bios version 2.55, will updating bios solve this problem?
    Did anyone have experience with this card? Please help!

    Hi, George:
    Thank you for your reply!
    The seller who sold me this card claims it is the same product as 03T9015, it's just Lenovo makes different lables during different periods. I compared this card with 03T9015 pictures online and they appear to have the same Lenovo P/N number and the same Cyber Tan P/N number. But the card I have is mssing the FRU numbers. I'm attaching pictures of both.
    My questions are:
    1. Is my card realy 03T9015?
    2. If this is not, will a real 03T9015 pass the whitelist check?
    To my understanding, the way whitelist works is to check the card's Dev/Ven and Sub Dev/Ven numbers. Can someone who has 03T9015 post his/her numbers so I can compare with the one I have?
    Moderator note; picture(s) converted to link(s) About Posting Pictures In The Forums

  • MicroSD card support for 808 PureView an Nokia N8-...

    Hello community,
    this is just an Information from my personal experience.
    Yesterday I bought a 808 PureView and inserted a Sandisk Ultra Class 10 micro SD with UHS-I.
    http://www.amazon.de/dp/B007JTKLEK
    This memory card does not work with Symbian Belle Feature Pack 1 Software Version 112.020.0311 which is dated 2012-06-26. The same micro SD card does work very well in my Nokia N8-00 with Symbian BelleRefresh Software Version 111.040.1511 dated 2012-07-28.
    I'm currently investigating which high speed 32GB micro SD will work in the Nokia 808 PureView.
    Wolfgang
    Wolfgang Exler
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    @Wolfgang_Exter
    Using Sandisk 32GB Class 4 microSDHC in 808 without issue, although Class 6 advised for recording HD video.
    Happy to have helped forum with a Support Ratio = 42.5

  • Support for irctc on line bookingg, Support for irctc on line bookingg

    Will iPod  supports irctc .co.in 

    If you can't do it via Safari, is there an app for it? If not then you can't do it.

  • Graphic Card Support for pm9m-v

    I was wondering if anyone could tell me what graphic cards my motherboard supports as i am about to purchase one. It is an msi pm9m-v running on win 7 with 1gb rddr ram.
    Thanx

    Wonkanoby is right.  The only option would be a PCI Video Card.  Forget about PCI Express and/or AGP cards.
    Probably best to stick with onboard video.

  • PRI card support for analog/didgiatl calls

    In Cisco 2621XM, I want to install a PRI card which can receive/accept analog as well as digital calls

    Hi Jassi,
    You can use the follwong modules for your requirement
    T1 PRI/CAS
    E1 PRI/CAS
    FXO
    FXS
    E&M
    But you require minimum Cisco IOS 12.2(8)T IOS version.
    Regards
    PSM

  • 6GB MicroSD Card support for E90??

    Hi,
    Possible to run 6GB MicroSD card on E90 communicator??Please kindly advise.Thanks!
    E90 Communicator V 07.40.1.2!!

    Oh Great! Thanks alot guys!Appreciate the advise.Guess I will upgrade my external memory on E90
    E90 Communicator V 07.40.1.2!!

  • Modules supported on WS-X6704-10GE line card for WS-C6509-E

    We are planning to expand the local network and looking to add 10G line cards on our WS-6509-E. The confusion is over the types of optic modules that these cards support.
    Can anyone advice if these line cards support all these three - namely XENPAK, X2 & SFP Plus?
    Thanks

    What is the difference between these supervisor (VS-S720-10G-3C or VS-S720-10G-3CXL)
    See the "XL" at the end of the part number?   If you get the regular (no "XL"), you'll only get 256k IPv4 routes.  The "XL" will allow you up to 1 million IPv4 routes.  
    Is these modules will work with c6509E and these supervisor  (VS-S720-10G-3C or VS-S720-10G-3CXL)
    Yes and no.  Yes, these supervisor cards will work on the current chassis you've got.  But if you plan to use VSS, then your 6704 line card is incompatible with VSS.  
    Another thing, don't waste your money.  Firstly, the price of the Sup720 is exactly the same as the price of the newer (and more powerful) Sup2T supervisor card.  
    And lastly, rumours has it that the 6500 chassis is in it's "last gasp".  Personally, I'm waiting for Cisco to announce the EoS/EoL.  
    If you want to future-proof your investment, the potential replacement of the venerable 6500E is the 6880-X/6807-X.

  • Does TR line card (ASR9K) support H-QoS?

    Hi,
    I have some question regarding on the 2nd generation line card for ASR9k.
    Line Card Types
    The Cisco ASR 9000 Series line cards are available in Service Edge Optimized and Packet Transport Optimized variants.
    • Service Edge Optimized (SE) line cards are designed for customer deployments requiring enhanced quality of service (QoS).
    • Packet Transport Optimized (TR) line cards are designed for network deployments where basic QoS is required.
    Different line card types may be mixed within the same system.
    I already review ASR9k presentation from Xander-Thuijs and found that
    SE line card support 256K queues/NP
    TR line card support 8 queues/Port
    I'm not sure whether TR line card support H-QoS.
    Could you please give more clarification about this?
    Br,
    Pipatpong

    HEre is an example:
    RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG#show qos int g 0/0/0/0 out
    Sun Oct 13 13:31:19.867 EDT
    Interface: GigabitEthernet0_0_0_0 output
    Bandwidth configured: 200000 kbps Bandwidth programed: 200000 kbps
    ANCP user configured: 0 kbps ANCP programed in HW: 0 kbps
    Port Shaper programed in HW: 200000 kbps
    Policy: xtp Total number of classes: 4
    Level: 0 Policy: xtp Class: class-default
    QueueID: N/A
    Shape CIR : NONE
    Shape PIR Profile : 0/4(S) Scale: 195 PIR: 199680 kbps  PBS: 2496000 bytes
    WFQ Profile: 0/9 Committed Weight: 10 Excess Weight: 10
    Bandwidth: 0 kbps, BW sum for Level 0: 0 kbps, Excess Ratio: 1
    Level: 1 Policy: xt Class: m1
    Parent Policy: xtp Class: class-default
    QueueID: 136 (Priority 1)
    Queue Limit: 4 kbytes Abs-Index: 4 Template: 0 Curve: 6
    Shape CIR Profile: INVALID
    Policer Profile: 53 (Single)
    Conform: 296 kbps (300 kbps) Burst: 3750 bytes (0 Default)
    Child Policer Conform: TX
    Child Policer Exceed: DROP
    Child Policer Violate: DROP
    Level: 1 Policy: xt Class: m2
    Parent Policy: xtp Class: class-default
    QueueID: 137 (Priority 2)
    Queue Limit: 8 kbytes Abs-Index: 6 Template: 0 Curve: 6
    Shape CIR Profile: INVALID
    Policer Profile: 54 (Single)
    Conform: 600 kbps (600 kbps) Burst: 7500 bytes (0 Default)
    Child Policer Conform: TX
    Child Policer Exceed: DROP
    Child Policer Violate: DROP
    Level: 1 Policy: xt Class: class-default
    Parent Policy: xtp Class: class-default
    QueueID: 138 (Priority Normal)
    Queue Limit: 2496 kbytes Abs-Index: 89 Template: 0 Curve: 0
    Shape CIR Profile: INVALID
    WFQ Profile: 0/9 Committed Weight: 10 Excess Weight: 10
    Bandwidth: 0 kbps, BW sum for Level 1: 0 kbps, Excess Ratio: 1
    This class default will get reused by other interaces very likely unless you have a bw remaining (percent) in there.
    So every time you see a unique QueueID you burn a queue.
    the reason why the parent shaper at level 0 says N/A is because this is a hierarchical pmap and is shaping the overal chuld classes inclduing class-default.
    So in this example applying this pmap multiple times will burn queues for class-default.
    In other words, this Pmap example uses 3 queues. One for the shaper (child class-default) and 2 PQ's of prio's 1 and 2).
    policy-map xtp
    class class-default
      service-policy xt
      shape average 200 mbps
    end-policy-map
    RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG#sh run policy-map xt
    Sun Oct 13 13:34:45.049 EDT
    policy-map xt
    class m1
      priority level 1
      police rate 300 kbps
    class m2
      priority level 2
      police rate 600 kbps
    class class-default
    end-policy-map

  • POE Line Cards for 6807 Core Switch

    Folks,
    Could you please advise, if there is any line card specific for 6807 Core Switch , that provides 10/100/1000 POE Ethernet . I have only seen in datasheet as non - poe ..
    Thanks for your support.
    Regards,
    Aaron

    Hi Aaron,
    If you need a switch that can provide gigabit ethernet POE, you might want to consider having a stand alone switch, like Cisco Catalyst 3560. Kindly refer to this link for more information.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-3560-series-switches/product_data_sheet09186a00801f3d7d.html
    Hope this helps! 
    Kind regards.

Maybe you are looking for