Line item report on secondary cost element (cat - 21)

Hi Gurus,
Secondary cost element with category 21 is used for internat settlement from order to wbs or wbs to cost center. But can we see line item report on this cost element. Or we cannot see any line item report on this cost element. it is just used for internal settlement purpose.
Please clear this doubt. thank you

Hi Mohit,
I hope you can have line item report @ order and WBS element stright away...
for orders use: KOB1 transaction code for actual line items, where you have the facility of entering CE or CE group to find the vaues related to particular cost elements in the order. If you are flexible with CEs related to 21, give there otherwise create a CE group specific to 21 category and enter the group and find the results you want.
same way for WBS elements/projects: we have transaction code CJI3 for actual line items, here also we can enter CE or CE groups
Not only for actual line items, we have the option of viewing plan line items, budget line items, and commitment line items @ both order and WBS level with different transaction codes other than mentioned above, like KOB2, KOB3, CJI4, CJI2 etc
I hope it helps a lot if I understand your query right
Regards..
Jose

Similar Messages

Report on Secondary cost elements

Hi all,
Can any one tell me how to see line item report on the secondary cost element that are used in asessment cyles and also how to display the documents that are generated for these secondary cost elements after running the asessment cycles.
Thanks

Hi MKR,
I am assuming that your assessment cycles are tied to cost center as senders, so even though you don't look by assessment cycle you could use transaction S_ALR_87013611. Set the selection criteria for the Controlling Area, month year/period combination and version you need, leave the cost center fields blank and enter as cost element the secondary cost element(s) of your cycles. After executed, double click on the total actual cost amount associated individually to each cost element and an additional screen would be displayed, from where you can select the option to display actual line items report. The list of line items is displayed. If you have the ALV functionality additional columns can be added in the display to segregate the information based, transaction type, origin, etc.
Hope it helps , if it does please award points.
Thanks,
GG

Line item report on Statistical WBS element.

Hi All,
I need to extract Line report on statistical WBS element. I tried CJI3 and end up with the message No costs, revenues or finances were selected.
can some one help me on this.
Thanks and Regards,
Vinod

Hi,
Please check below:
Table PRPS: Select OBJNR and pass to RPSCO and check if any value exists there. Note down the Value type, Year.
While in CJI3, please check if any dynamic Selection is active, remove all.
if mutliple selection shows any exclusions, remove all.
Posting Data: Remove the values. (Or put from 01.01.1900 to 31.12.9999)
Select the standard SAP Layout (Starting with 1SAP)
Value type=11 should be selected by default (Ensure it is checked)
Hope it helps!
Thank you and Regards,
Varshal Kachole

Reports for display secondary cost element

Dear SAP consultant
After run settlement cycles we going to display reports for secondary
cost elements but it is return zero balance, i know that when i am trying
to drill down it will get the whole data. but it is not practical because
the huge amount of data that transferred to this report. In the other
hand it will display the data with +/- sign which is not be helpful.
Is there any report to display the result from settlement run on the
secondary cost elements.
<< Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important. But the answers in the forum are provided by volunteers. Please do not ask for help quickly. >>
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Jan 12, 2011 4:12 PM

hi
goto S_SL0_21000007 > select as per your requirement > give Cost Element Group for Sec CE and execute
Kkumar

Tables For Secondary Cost Elements

Dear Folks,
Please Help me for getting details (TABLES) of Secondary Cost elements Actual Line items Date wise and Cost Center wise
Thanks in advance
Regaards
ASHOK K

Hi Ashok,
some important Costing tables
COEP - Line Items (by Period)
COEJ - Line Items (by Fiscal year
COKA - Control Data for Cost center wise
COEJT - Line Items for Prices
COEPT - Line Items for Prices
CSKA Cost Elements (Data Dependent on Chart of Accounts)
CSKB Cost Elements (Data Dependent on Controlling Area)
CSKS - Cost Center Master Data
CSLA Activity Master
COBK - Document Header
COEJL - Line Items for Activity
COEJR - Line Items for SKF
COEPL - Line Items for Activity
COEPR - Line Items for SKF
COKL - Control Data for Activity
COKP - Control Data for Primary
COKR - Control Data for Statics
COKS - Control Data for Secondary
AUSP - Characteristic Values
A132 - Price per Cost Center
A136 - Price per Controlling Area
A137 - Price per Country / Region
COSC - CO Objects: Assignment of Original
CSSK - Cost Center / Cost Element
CSSL - Cost Center / Activity Type
KAPS - CO Period Locks -
regards
Gokul

Cost element and Line item reports show different actual costs

Hi PS experts,
My client has an issue pertaining to actual cost reports. The cost element report shows actual costs $42,000 for one WBS and when I double click to see details the value it shows is $2100. Even when I checked line item report for this WBS the value is $2100. What could be the reason for getting different values? If some one throw some light on this it would be great helpful to me
Regards,
Laxminarsimha

Laxminarsimha
The values in CJI3 should be correct and will include all postings (e.g. Settlement values) and possibly Actual Revenues unless a filter is in place - so take this as being your correct figure to start with.
Your drilldown will show the same value as CJI3 because it is CJI3
Any cost element report you are using is probably correct for what you are asking - is this a Standard Cost Element Report you are using or is it bespoke
One thing to be careful of when you drilldown on Cost Element Reports is that you do not always get the a make up of the value you have drilled down
e.g.
Cost Element Report was run for Period 1 to 6 2008 and shows £100.00
You drilldown and sometimes the drilldown automatically shows ALL line items e.g £500.00 (not just the values for periods 1 to 6 of 2008 which you may expect £100.00)
In the past I've removed the drilldown capability from bespoke cost element reports to prevent drilldown to the line item report (which is CJI3) because of this problem.
Usually where values for a a number of periods only (not total costs) was required
Other factors to consider
Revenues/Settlements may be excluded from Cost Element Report but will not be excluded from CJI3 unless you specifically restrict
You need to identify which types are postings are missing from the Cost Element Report (what is common...cost element, dr/cr indicator, business transaction)
I've also hit the mistake in the past where I've asked for periods 1 2007 to period 3 2008 and instead of giving me just over a years worth of actual it gave me actuals for periods 1 to 3 for 2007 and 1 to 3 for 2008.
Hope this helps
Steve

WBS Element on AR/AP Line Item Report

Hi All
When I run the FBL1n report for a vendor who has a PO which has a WBS element - I dont see the WBS element coming up on the line item report(s).
Although the field is there on the layout - it is not picking the WBS Element into the report - can anyone please tell me why this is and how I can get this field to fill with values...
Thank you
Rukshana

hi,
If you had activated Project Cash Management, you can try report CJIA which can substitute the report line item wise list for a particular project or for a Particular Vendor.
Why the standard system is not showing WBS because, a single Vendor line can be posted against multiple expense so system cannot determine which WBS to be shown in the report so it is left blank in reports, this will be applicable for Purchase order no, Cost Centers, WBS etc.
As suggested by Suresh you can use the BTE 1650, but it will keep one WBS in the line even you have multiple WBS elements used for the document posting.
For Ex
Expense 1 Dr 1000- WBS 1
Expense 2 Dr 1000- WBS 2
Expense 3 Dr 1000- WBS 3
Vendor A Cr 3000
Against Vendor line item A - it will show WBS 1 alone.As there is no standard solution you can use BTE if your are satisfied with the above example or you have to activate Project Cash management to find the exact reporting but in different reporting structure.
Thanks and regards
Praveen.J

Asset Balances & Cost Line items Report

Hi,
I am looking for a Report which would combine Asset (S_ALR_87011963)balance report and Cost line item Report(CJi3) for Projects.

Hi,
The flow is like this ( if u r using timesheets for confirmation):
CAT2 : Timesheet: Enter Times : User enters the time.
CATS_APPR_LITE : Approval of timesheet
CAT5 : Transfer to Projects.
This will post cost to Projects.
Another way of getting the Actual cost is Confirmation using CN25 or CN29.
Regards,

Secondary Cost Element Values doesn't display in Profit Center Report

Hi everyone,
I'm having a problem with our Profit Center plan/actual/variance reports wherein it doesn't display the postings I made to the Secondary cost element when I executed an assessment cycle (KSU5). I already set in the configuration that all postings to be done in the cost centers, should have a parallel posting to the profit center assigned to it. I can see the postings in my cost center reports, but not in my profit center report. Could I have missed out on any procedure to enable the secondary cost element parallel posting in my profit centers? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!

it might be the configuration of the library or some parameter in the report (record type should be 0 and 2 for actual values, where 2 stands for distributed values and 1 and 3 for planned values)
but it also might be that the reconciliation is done between different CC and same PC
- check your CC organisation asignment
- if sender cost center and receiver cost center have tha same PC it is probably the reason
- I had that problem my self and didn't solve it
cheers
matej

Internal Order - KOB1 - Actual Cost Line Item Report

Hi Friends,
I need to understand how the KOB1 Report - Actual Cost Line Item works.
As per my understanding when ever there is cost posted with assignment to Internal order this report should reflect the amount.
We have a PO with account assignment to Internal order and Asset.
When Goods Receipts is posted the with posting key 70, the report is reflecting the amount.
When Invoice Receipt is posted KOB1 report is not reflecting this amount.
There is one Invoice receipt posted with entry
31 Dr
70 DR
86 Dr GR/IR
and the 70 debit amount is coming in the report.
So can any one please tell me does this report show all the entries with IO assignment or when posting key 70, 75 ,80,81 are used.
And also is GR considered as cost posting or IR considered.
This issue has been pending from 3 months.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks
Satish

The KOB1 line item report will show you any expense account posted to that order.
Basically you are the order collecting the cost. During the invoice receipt, the expense account are not involved, except in cases of a price difference.
The vendor account credit and debit to GR/IR are not concerned with the order.

Delete of Element in Form for COPA line item report

Hello
I would like to change a form used for a COPA line item report - delete an element, which has been included for years. Unfortunately I got message, that 'You cannot delete, because element xxx is dependent'.
If I insert a new element if have no problems to delete it afterwards.
Can anybody help me?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards
Søren Kirch
LOGSTOR A/S

Hi,
To my knowledge, you cannot delete the element until you assign the new one in the form if only single element is assigned.
In case anymore element is there, there can be possibility this element is taken into consideration for making formula.
Regards,
Harish

For financial report requirment can we consider secondary cost element cost

For financial reporting requirment can we consider secondary cost element cost to profit and loss a/c

In our senario _ cost is booking cost centers and revenues booking concern profit centers .
for Financial reporting requirment can I include secondary cost to profit and loss a/c
what is the impact on the report
exp: salary booking in primary cost,than Per hour man hour cost computed by costing dept for allocate to concern department
it is cost center activity price we specify in kp26 at the time of pm order confirm it will confim the activity quandity price will from planning area only, so for salaries in primary g/ls already captured, if we consider secondary it may double booking
srinivasa reddy

Secondary cost element report

Hi experts,
i just looking for secondary cost element reports ?
regards,
Sanju M S

HI,
Go to T.code : S_SL0_21000007 and,
Go to bellow link
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/PLM/SettlementandCostElementReports
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/a9/ab76ce414111d182b10000e829fbfe/content.htm
Thanks,
Raviteja

Cost Center Line Item Report

Hi All,
Is there any BI Conent Datsource which will help costcenter line item report.
otherwise is there any datasource which cover these tables...ADRP,COVP,CSKS,CSKU,CSKT,EKKO,EKPO,ESIL,LFA1,MSEG
Regards

Hello Srini,
Take the link and see the left pane of that screen, you will get all the datasource list relavant for you requirement.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/13/fa383fc4805003e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Good day
Regards
Arun S

Secondary cost element in KB11N

Hello.
I'm not allowed to use a secondary cost element in a reposting.
What do I have to modify?
Thank You

Hello,
You cannot use secondary cost element. You need to use primary only.
Please go through the following:
DISTRIBUTION =========== Distribution was created for transfer primary costs from a sender cost center to receiving controlling objects. During distribution, only cost centers or business process can be used as sender. A distribution receiver can be a cost center, WBS element, internal order, cost object, or a business process. You can restrict the number of receiver categories in customizing. Primary Postings (such as, energy costs) are collected on a cost center, and allocated at the end of the period by means of the user-defined key. You can only distribute primary costs. During this process, the original cost element remains the same. Line items are posted for the sender as well as for the receiver, enabling the allocation to be recorded exactly. You can reverse distributions as often as required. You use the Cycle-Segment method to define sender-receiver relationships. PERIODIC REPOSTING ================= Differences between periodic reposting and distribution are due to information content and performance. For periodic reposting, no separate credit record is written on the sender for the cost element in the summary report. Instead, the totals record for the cost element is reduced on the debit side, which means that the original debit amount can no longer be checked there (u201Cunclean creditu201D). However, during distribution, the system writes a totals record for the credit (u201Cclean creditu201D). The information on the receiver is the same for periodic reposting and distribution (u201Cclean debitu201D). Compared with periodic reposting, during distribution, the system also updates the partner in the totals record for the sender. This means that the partner can be displayed in the information system on the totals record level. As fewer totals records are written during periodic reposting, performance is better than during distribution. ASSESSMENT =========== Assessment was created to transfer primary and secondary costs from a sender cost center to receiving controlling objects. During assessment, cost center or business processes can be used as senders. The receivers for an assessment can be a cost center, WBS element, internal order, cost object, or a business process. You can restrict the number of receiver categories in customizing. Primary and secondary posting are allocated at the end of the period by the user-defined key. During assessment, the original cost elements are summarized into assessment cost elements (secondary cost element category = 42). As the system writes fewer total records, the assessment has a better performance than periodic reposting and distribution. The system does not display the original cost elements in the receivers. Therefore, assessment is useful if the cost drilldown for the receiver is not important. Similar to distribution, the partner is updated in the totals record during distribution You can reverse assessments as often as required. You use the Cycle-Segment method to define sender-receiver relationships. Regards, Ravi

Line item report on secondary cost element (cat - 21)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for