Line Item settlement of Internal Order through Investment Measure
Dear friends
Can we do the line item settlement of Internal order. The Internal order is created through IO as Investment Measure.
Thank You
Hi,
Yes. It is possible to have line item settlement for Investment Internal Order.
Trust this helps much!
Cheers!
Similar Messages
-
Internal Order through Investment measure
Hi friends
I need help in the following issue:
I am creating Internal orders through Investment Measures.
When ever i create an internal order in the background it creates an AuC.
When I settle the IO the amount is posting to AuC.
After that I tried to Capitalize the AuC to main asset through AIBU transaction code, system throwing an error "Line item settlement is not possible for asset XXX XXXX".
Is this method of capitalizing right or any other method available to capitalize the AuC to Main Fixed Asset.
Please Advice me.Capitalisation wouldn't be possible using AIBU in this case as your IO is an investement measure.
Options you've got to capitalise such AUC's is
1. Maintain the settlement rule on the IO with receiver as the final asset, set the status of the IO to TECO and then use T Code KO88 (Processing Type - Automatic) - Final Capitalisation
2. Maintain the settlement rule on the IO with receiver as the final asset and then use T Code KO88 (Processing Type - Partial Capitalisation) - Partial Capitalisation
Regards
Sreenivas -
Exit / badi for individual service line item detail with internal orders.
Hello guys,
<b>Issue 1.</b>as per our scenario we want to get the individual service line item details with Internal Orders.
Please provide me any exit/badi with each item level with individual service line item Internal Orders.
<b>Issue 2:</b> Remain same for issue 3 for blocking status. We want to delete item level for particular line what about the service rows which assigned in particular item.
point will be rewarded for the suitabel answers.
please give me response ASAP.
With Regards
yogeshHey Yogesh,
I have the same scenario... Could you please drop a mail to [email protected] with the details of BADI and other details that you implemted for the same.
Thanks a lot in advance. -
Vendor line item display with internal order
In Vendor line item display is it possibe to see details of the line item of offsetting account .
For example a expense account is debited & vendor account is credited .At the time expense account debit a internal order has been assigned in line item.
User wants to see the vendor line item display ( T code FBL1N) with details of internal order appearing in open line items display etc .
Is this possible .I created a layout with order as a field but order does not show any values in the line display of vendor.
Please revert back if this can be possibe.
Thanks
Manojwith a combination of notes
112312 - Line item - Display of offsetting ac information
373268 - Line item - new display field
569939 - Line item - Open FI - Absolute amounts
1034354 - FAGLL03 - Display of offsetting account information
you should be able to get it there. -
Line item display for Internal Order
Hi All,
What is the transaction code for Internal Order line item display.
Thanks,
MisbahHi,
Its KOB1 to KOB4.
Rgds. -
Line item Settlement and KOB5 for automatically created AUCs to PM orders
Hello Experts,
I am trying to set up line item settlement for automatically created AUCs. We would like to use line item settlement because we want to see the costs split up by either percentage or amount when settled to the AUC. If I can't settle by percentage or amount to the AUC then i'd like to be able to temporarily block some of the costs from settling. This is for billing not capitalization purposes since all costs will eventually settle to one final asset. The settlement is done using transaction KO88 or KO8G and automatic processing type. I’ve configured a PM Order type as an investment order and set up the related investment profile and investment asset class. Some of the things I've determined from my testing:
Using transaction KOB5, costs can be split up by creating other distribution rules, but only to another object (i.e. another
asset, order, cost center etc. by using the Preliminary) not to the automatically created AUC linked to the order
The default settlement rule is account assignment category FXA, percentage rate 100%, settlement type AUC to the AUC
and therefore cannot be updated/altered when using KOB5 or any other transaction.
Once the costs are settled to another object other than the AUC, those costs cannot be settled to the final asset. Creating Preliminary
settlement rules to a receiver IO and changing the period or fiscal year will not “block” costs from settling whether the processing type is automatic, by period, partial capitalization or full settlement.
I’ve been testing this out in our development client and need verification that this is the way that transaction KOB5 works with line item settlement or did I do something incorrect .
Your feedback is greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance.Hi Zaid,
Thank you for your response. Assets are not my area so I’m not sure if I missed a transaction or step in the process. I tested this out by doing the following steps:
Created AUC Asset class with line item checked
Assigned PM Order type as non-investment with no investment profile and created order number
Created a main asset number
Created an AUC sub asset number to step 3
Created settlement rule to sub asset number on order
Posted costs to order
Settled from order to AUC with transaction KO88
Created distribution rules for asset with transaction AIAB
Settled from sub asset to main asset number with transaction AIBU
When I settled from the sub to the main asset number in step 9, I found I lost the line item detail. Is there another configuration setting I need to make to allow me to see the line item detail when I use AIBU?
Thank you, -
Line item settlement(Invest prof)
Dear Experts...........
I have one doubt on Settlement (INVESTMENT PROFILE)
I have seen like
Summary setlement.
Line item settlement and list of origin.
I have read in SAP HELP ,evn though im not clear can any one plaz expalin in simple words about this different types of Setllements.
Lineitem,Summary settlement.....wht is the function,how it works.
Regards
ChandraHi
In the summary settlement you can not break down the values of line item (e.g an invoice) and distribute it amongst the receivers.
While in line item settlement you can distribute the amount of one invoice to different receivers. Take the example given in the link below. There are tow invoices from constuction (of value X) and electrical (value Y). Now if you are using the summery settlement then all the debit (X+Y) can be settled to one or more recevires but you can not break in between X and Y
While if you go for line item settlement then you can use distribution rule like 20% of X and 80% of Y to one receiver and balance to another.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/2a/f9f7de493111d182b70000e829fbfe/content.htm
Regards -
Settlement of Internal order to Asset under construction (AUC)
Hi,
To All
While settling an internal order to AUC through KO88 it shows already settled whereas the balance of the internal remains the same and while settling AUC the error shows "there is no line item".
What can be the problem, why internal order is not settling to AUC?
Has anybody face this issue before? I have spent hell of the time on this issue but haven't resolved this. I would greatly appreciate your response on this.
Thanks
JainendraHi Jainendra,
Please refer OSS Notes# 310116 (Settlement AuC: Open items not correctly cleared )
OSS Notes# 412869 (AuC settlement: AW521 or line item not settled )
Have a look into the below link,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4f/71daf9448011d189f00000e81ddfac/frameset.htm
Also refer the below SDN link:
Re: Capitalization of Asset
Hope this helps.
Please assign points as a way to say thanks
Message was edited by: Ravi Rana -
Adding an extra line item in completed sales order
Dear Friends
We have a requirement that a sales order say order no 1000 with material A qty 5 units
This order is Delivered---Billed
The requirement 1 is no one should change the qty to more than 5 units
This i can control through OVAH message settings from warning to error
The requirement 2 is no one should add material B or material C in that order 1000
No other material should be added
This i think has to be done through some userexit
Expecting your valuable inputs on this issue mainly the requirement 2 the suitable exit
Regards
RajaHI,
Perhaps you can try with USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAP in report MV45AFZB.
Other possibilty is the BADI BADI_SD_SALES_ITEM, where the method ITEM_CHECK.
Perhaps the most powerful is userexit_save_document in report MV45AFZZ, but it works when you save the document. Here you can compare XVBAP (with the new item will have the field UPDKZ = 'I') with YVBAP (you can compare the line items of both internal tables). Finally, you can use the status of deliveried and billed of XVBUP, YVBUP, XVBUK, YVBUK to do the final checks.
Perhaps you can fix warning messages in the first exits (in dialog) and in the saving event set the error message.
Set the break point and check the data in these structures, and think in the right algorithm.
I hope this helps you
Regards,
Eduardo -
Problems with Trading partner when settling an internal order
Hi experts,
We are trying to settle an internal order to a G/L account. For this account there is a validation defined, which states error when the trading partner is not entered. Hovewer we cannot change or cancel the validation for business reasons. We cannot use a different G/L account for settlement neither.
Is there any chance to add the trading partner in the order settlement rule? Any other ideas?
Thank you,
MichalSince you cannot disable the validation and cannot use any other GL account, use a substitution as Sridhar suggested. I am adding to this that trading partner is either assigned at header level or line item level. In this case since it is internal order settlement, I guess it has to be at the header level since it is not cross company. For cross company, the trading partner is automatically filled in so rule that out.
That leaves us with the option of substituting TP at the header level. You can use settlement document type as a condition to bring in a trading partner.
In the worst case if the validation is coming before the substitution kicks in, consider modifying the validation to put exclusions for settlement process, say, use business transaction for example.
Regards
Sharabh -
Delivery doc creation for a selected line item of the Sales order
Hi folks,
Can any one help me in how to create a delivery order for a selected line item of the Sales order.My requirement is the request comes from the web browser where a sales document and details of the items are shown the user select one line item and request for delivery create of that particular SO doc.I have used couple of FM to create delivery but the delivery create is depend on the schedule line dates so iam unable to figure out where exactly i can distinguish between the line items.
Example:
SO:- 11193645
Line item -1 has 2 schedule line 06/11
06/13
Line iteam-2 has 1 schedule line 06/12
so if i try to create Delivery doc for date 06/12
it creates partially for line 1 and line 2.
but my requirement is i wanted to create SO for only line item 1 as i wanted to process Del Doc for only line item 1.
If you have any idea please help me.hi ,
You can develop a customised FM to process the Idoc data .
1. Read the Idoc data into internal table for the line items which need to be delivered .
2. Run BDC for transaction 'VL01N' ( delivery creation ) through which eliminate the line items which are not in internal table and save the delivery document
Note : Because in VL01N , you specify the sales document with respect to which you want to perform delivery hence automatically all items are copied to the delivery document .
During BDC recording , select items by " MOVING TO TOP"
and then deleting the selected item
If you face problem in BDC recording , i can help u that too . -
Route schedule not updated in some line item of a sales order
Hi Gurus,
All order are processed through the EDI interface automatically. Order
XXXXXXXXX for USA customer 40000XXXX is maintained in route reschedule
setup T-code VL52 on specific departure day thursday.
above are line item of same sales order, with same shipping point and route .
Why only some salesorder lines missing the route schedule ??
Please Help
Regards
AbhilashWhen you post a query here, you need to have patience until some members go through your post. Please dont expect somebody should respond to you immediately as everybody has their own priorities.
Coming to your query, it could be due to many reasons as per the following note:-
Note 1750978 - Route Schedule does not populate on sales order
Go through the Resolutions given in the above note and check with your system
G. Lakshmipathi -
Send all line items of a sales order to IPC along with condition lines data
We wrote some pricing routines in R/3, where while doing he calculations for condition line item, we needed to pull in the material information for previous line items. So we exported vbap and imported it inside the routine to be able to have access to all the line items in the sales order. Now, we need to put in the same kind of logic in CRM/IPC. My question is what would be the equivalent of SAP's(import/export) commands for internal tables in case of IPC. I looked at the BADI CRM_COND_COM_BADI but still do not see how I can send all the line items data to IPC. So I guess, the question comes down to, how do I send all the line items of the sales order (whole VBAP in R/3 terms) to IPC along with the condition line data? Can someone please help?
ThanksHi Vaibhav,
If you can get the list of Sales orders which has deleted line items and force completion status. You can manage them in BI via lookup or navigation attribute.
Just my views I am sharing .
Thanks,
KDJ -
Same material can exist on multiple line items for the same order.
Hi
Is there any specific customising setting or web shop setting through which we can restrict user to add same material on multiple line items for the same order ?
RegardsNo.
But if this is a must requirement, you can do an elaborate check during order save in ORDER_SAVE BAdI and return error. So, it will be only during order save.
Eawar Ram
http://www.parxlns.com -
Sample Material in the 3rd Line item of the Sales Order
Hi,
We have configured the system in the sales order as follows.
1. Commercial Material
2. Bonus Material.(ie Free Material)
Now, i want to add the 3rd line item in the sales order as Sample with different Material number. How go about this. kindly let me.
Regards
RaviHi there,
Enter the material in the sales order & change the item catg manually in VA02.
But free goods & sample materials are dealt differently..
Freegoods is entered as TANN item catg along with nornam TAN item in standard order OR.
But sample materials or free of charge items are processed through different order type FD for eg.
Even thought the item catg proposed in FD is TANN,, the whole process will not have pricing as TANN items arenot relevant for pricing.
Regards,
Sivanand
Maybe you are looking for
-
Why does my ical on my ipod touch not sync with my ical on my desktop imac ical? It will if I put it in on my desktop though. Please help, Brie
-
Open deliveries in the credit management
++Hello,++ ++We can see from the FD33 transaction that there is a particular customer, who has lot of credit exposure, as well as credit limit used is 89.43%.++ ++I can find from a Z report that there are lot of open deliveries. I can see the total v
-
Oracle Receiving Interface R11
Where can I get detailed documentation on this process?
-
Hi PI gurus when iam doing the scenario SOAP to JDBC synchronous and while running the scenario Iam getting one error SOAP: error occured: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Application:EXCEPTION_DURING_EXECUTE:: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api
-
ISight Built-in not working more info
Also the system props say vender specific they sgould be saying builtin isight. how to i add/install drivers, and where are they? <post edited by Host>