Line items posted through the non leading ledger

Hi Sap Experts,
I have activated non leading ledger to which assigned fiscal year variant.
I want to post line items through the non leading ledger.
Can any body please me advise.
Regards,
Prabhakar

HI,
Use the tcode FB50L and FB01L.
It is Ledger group posting without LeadLeadger.
Regards
Madhu M

Similar Messages

Posting in Open item managed accounts in Non Leading ledger

Hello,
I would like to know how can we post into a open item managed G/L account in the non-leading ledger only.
If it is not possible, then what could be the reason for the same?
Regards,
Sameer

As per the New GL design it is not possible to post an entry specific to non lead ledger to a GL which is open item managed. The reason is very clear. In non lead ledgers we do not do clearing we only do adjustments entries. Clearing can only be done in a lead ledger. Ask yourself about making a payment to a vendor from non lead ledger. It is not at all sensible.
What you need to do to handle this scenario is to create a new GL (if it is a B/S account then mark it as line item managed and in the text you need to mention that this account is specific to non Lead ledger postings. There is no way in ECC 6.0 to flag a GL for non lead ledgers only. Once you create this account you can post an entry to this using T Code FB50L. From financials standpoint you can club this new GL in the same group or number range where you have the same account with open item managed checkbox.
SAP is working to extend the clearing functionality to non lead ledgers but I am not sure which enhancement pack will have this feature. Till that time you need to follow the solution as described above.
Hope this helps

Posting entry into non leading ledger for already closed books

Hi
We have two ledgers - Leading (as per IGAAP) and Non Leading (IFRS)
Now there is Rs. 54Lacs expenses which are pertaining to March 2010. This expenses are being booked in October 2010
Now as per IFRS, i need to re-instate this amount in March 2010
So i want to pass this entry for IFRS ledger only in fiscal year which is already closed and carry forward
So what should i do now?
Should i open the posting period for March 2010 (last closed fiscal year). Is it possible ?
If i open and post the entries, do i need to carry forward the balances again for IFRS Ledger ?

Hi Meenu,
You need to open the posting period 3 of 2010 and post entry only in the non Leading ledger of IFRS. When you post entry it will automatically be reflected in the current year.
Secondly, the carry forward transaction does no harm even if you run it again..
Regards,
SAPFICO

New Gl- report with some details of CO for the non leading ledger

Hi,
I am using New GL. I have 2 ledgers (local ledger and USGAAP); The local ledger is the leading ledger, so is the one which impacts to CO. I need some information in CO (mainly cost center) for the non-leading ledger (USGAAP). I am thinking in create a report painter with the table of non-leading ledger, but I cannot find a table in NGL which save the CO object and can choose the ledger. I am looking too, this information by a standard report, but I cannot find one.
Any idea about a solution of this situation?
Thanks,
Cecilia

Hi Cecilia, did you assign Cost Center scenario (FIN_CCA) to your ledgers?, otherwise NGL Tables (FAGLFLEXT and FAGLFLEXA) won't have Cost Center field populated. If this is the case, maybe your only option is use BKPF then BSEG + BSEG_ADD (Entry View of Accounting Document for Additional Ledgers) and pull Cost Center from there.
I hope this helps.

Post open item management account into non-leading ledger independently

I want to use FB50L to post an open item management account balance value into non-leading ledger, the system throws out an error.
I know it can not delete the sign ---open item.
Could anyone give some advice?
Thank you!

Hi,
Open item management account as an adjustment account.
By your description the adjustment account for GL account is the same
at Trx OBA1, so this is the reason for error message
FAGL_FC_VAL does not allow Open item management account as an adjustment account
in standard because normally there are more than one ledger set up,
and Open item management account must be valid for all ledgers (as the clearing can't be
carried out by ledger). If FAGL_FC_VAL allows this and made the posting
on one specific non-ledger, this basic rule can't be fulfilled.
It's same as trx. FB50L that doesn't allow Open item management account to be
entered in case of ledger-specific posting.
FAGL_POST_SERVICE012. This is justified because open items must be
made valid for all ledgers in the client, and even if there's only one
ledger (0L) in your case that this is also considered as 'ledger-
specific' posting.
Please also check the SAP note:
1239651 FAGL_FC_VALUATION: Posting with a ledger
However you can apply SAP note 884639 to remove the ledger group from
FAGL_FC_VAL posting, and this way the Open item management account can be
used as an adjustment account. However please note that SAP note 884639
is MODIFICATION and the coding could be overwritten by applying the
support package or with upgrade.
Thanks,
Raviteja

Posting period for Non leading ledger

Hi
I am having Leading ledger & Non Leading ledger.
I am posting a document on a particular date. The period relating to that date in leading ledger is open & in non leading ledger is closed.
As per SAP standard the system will check the leading ledger & allow the posting.
Is it possible to write a validation for the following scenario.
If a document is posted the system should check the posting period in both leading & non leading ledger, if both are open then only the document should gets posted other wise an error message should be displayed.
Kinldy help me to address this issue.
Regards
R.Karthigayan

You have a few options here.
1 make sure your periods align each other
2 Use both selection options in OB52 and allow certain users to restricted periods
3 Use authorizations to validate the user if they can post into a period
4 Create a user exit on the save accounting document function module to check the rules.
Please award points if this is useful.

Double Posting using Leading and Non-leading ledger...

Gurus'
I am at a client that is using the leading (0L) and non leading (PL) ledger set up. Also, we have configure an additional document document (ZF) for posting to the (PL) ledger. The following configuration settings have been made:
1     US GAAP (group accounting) (PLN)                    1     0L
2     Depreciation on tax limited value (cars)                    0
3     PAS (Polish Accounting Standards) (PLN)                    2     PL
10     CIT TAX (Polish taxation accounting) (PLN)                    3     PL
30     Consolidated balance sheet in local currency PLN       0
31     Consolidated balance sheet in group currency USD     0
32     Book depreciation in group currency (USD)                    0
Can someone explain why I am seeing a duplicate posting on the non leading ledger. Using the settlement transaction from Project Systems or ABZON from the Asset Module I get the expected (AA) document type posting on the leading ledger but also on the non-leading ledger. When I run ASKB, the document ZF is also posted on the non-leading ledger.
Can someone help me figure this out? Thanks,

Hi,
You can check BKPF (document header) and there is a field "ledger group" for which the document was posted onto. If there's no value in the field, it means the document was posted to all ledgers (leading and non leading).
Kyoko

ECC 5.0 BAPI for posting documents only in non-leading ledger

Hello,
for an FI-interface i want to call an BAPI for posting the documents. The document were posted to the leading ledger and to the non-leading ledger by usage of BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST.
Now there are cases to post documents only to the non-leading ledger.
Is there anywhere a possibility to tell the BAPI (e.g. enter the ledger group) only to post to the non-leading ledger or is another BAPI available to do so.
Thank you for your help.
Thomas

Hi Thomas,
You can use the same BAPI for any type of ledger postings. You can restrict your postings to Type of ledger.
Cheers
Srinivas

Reposting from Leading ledger to non leading ledger using RGURECGLFLEX

Hi,
We have a situation where we are trying to post documents from 2007 that are in the leading ledger to a non-leading ledger. When we run the report RGURECGLFLEX it produces a list of documents that cannot be posted with the error "Document NI1N 4900000000 2007 is not relevant for your target ledger ZR"
When we did some investigation we found that the ledger group was specified with the leading ledger 0L on this and many other documents.
Is there a way that we can get these documents to post to the non leading ledger and ignore ledger group field / functionality?
Do we need to go through and remove the ledger group 0L on each of the postings and re-run the report RGURECGLFLEX?
We are looking forward to a solution
Thanks & Regards
Martin Weakley

Hi Martin,
From the SAP Service market place you should find a document
[https://websmp105.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000688032&]
FAQsGeneral Ledger in mySAPERPSolution
In this document you will see the following section "Parallel Financial Accounting and Ledgers"
under which you will see the following stated
If a customer decides to use the New GL but only initially uses a single parallel
ledger (the leading Ledger). The customer then processes some transactions
for a few months and then decides to use an additional ledger onthe system. Is
there a program that you can run to enable retrospective postingto a new non-
leading ledger?
SAP offers a service called SAP General Ledger Migration. For detail please see
chapter u201CMiscellaneousu201D.
More Information regarding u201CSAP General Ledger Migrationu201Dcan be accessed
using the quick link u2018GLMIGu2019on the SAP Service Marketplace (
http://service.sap.com/GLMIG). Please also see OSS-note 812919
with kind regards
Cora

Posting in a non leading leadger with an open item G/L Accounts

Dear all,
Iu2019m facing the following problem.
Iu2019ve a document posted in a non-leading ledger with a openu2013item G/L account.
I taught that this kind of posting is not permitted by SAP-standard.
Is that so?
The management of G/L Account was never changed: it is always been defined as open-item in FS00..
Thanks in advance
Alberto

Correct, if your account is open item managed, then you CANNOT post to that account in individual ledgers.
Please check the setting 'Clearing Specific to Ledger Groups' in the 'Control Data' tab of GL account maintenance transaction FS00. Please read the help on that checkbox. If you check that checkbox, then you can post open items to that account in a specific ledger group and then also clear that item specific to that ledger group.

Posting of values in non leading ledger

Hello,
I had created two ledger on is leading and other is non-leading for IFRS and leading for local.
How the posting values get automatically get transferred to nonleading ledger if i do the posting through FB50L in leading ledger.
This is for IFRS reporting.
suggest

Dear Prem,
If u do transactions using other than FB50L t-code then, there is no selection of ledger. What ever ent done in Leading ledger will automatically flow to Non -Leading LEdger(IFRS).
When you use FB50L and select Non Leding Ledger the entries will be posted to IFRS ledger only. Nothing posting will happen to leading ledger that ie your local gap.
Regards,
Alok

Non-Leading Ledger Transactions- Direct Posting

Hi All
Kindly give your valuable info on below:
01. We are not getting Ledger info from regular Transactions i.e BSEG, BSIS, BSID etc. so we are taking leading ledger as ledger for transaction from this tables. Is it Right?
02. For Non-Leading Ledger Transactions-- From which table we can get it?
03. What is the process to post document only into Non-Leading Ledger? i.e transaction code or any specific method
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Venkat

Dear Srikanth,
Thanks for your valuable reply.
We are able to post only to Non-leading Ledger through FB50L. But we didnt find the documents in BSEG table.
Kindly help me if you know the tables name for Non-Leading Ledger Documents.
Regards,
Venkat

Post SKF only to New GL -Non leading ledger

Hi New GL experts,
We have an issue with SKF ( Statistical key figures) in New GL.
The below 2 options are considered:
1. Entry from KP46 ( CO Module) - Flowing to Leading and Non leading ledger. But the period is wrongly derived in Non leading ledger.
2. Entry from FAGLSKF1 ( New GL) - Posts to both Leading / Non leading ledger ( with correct periods) - But does not flow to Controlling.
Is there any way to post the SKF to Non leading ledger only ? or to CO module only without updating to Leading / Non leading ledger ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Siva

Hi Siva
Option 1 - If you deactivate the "Integrated Planning" in CO Version 0 OKEQ and also in GL Planning, the Plan data in CO wont auto update to New GL at all..
You need to then manually push the plan data into New GL using a special T code.. You can find the T code in the SPRO where you set up GL planning
Option 2
FAGLSKF1 does not update controlling, as designed.. So, maintain your SKFs independently in FI and CO
Option 3
Try to raise it to SAP if the period in Non Leading Ledger is wrong.. Ideally, the period you enter in KP46 should convert to the Non Leading Ledger period as per the Fiscal yr variant of Non leading Ledger
Br, Ajay M

Choosing the leading ledger-non-leading ledger

Hi,
I am in a regional project in southamerica. We are goning to use New GL. We are going to have different companies for each country. The chart of account is going to be one which is usefull for all country (it has different group account for each country), we are also going to have a group chart of account for statement balance sheet. We have to report abroad by USGAAP, but locally by other rules. In the distant future we think to use consolidation.
We are going to define the leading ledger and the non leading ledger, but we have the following problems:
-Which one should be the leading ledger (USGAAP or local rules), because I need many reports for two rules.
-What should I consider for this decision?
-In case I choose the USGAAP as leading ledger, what functionality I am going to loose for local report, (inflation, some report, asset accounting (I need more than one depreciation area for local rules and in some countries the functionality of inflation, etc).
Thanks,
Cecilia

Hi,
I suggest to have leading ledger following group GAAP (inyour case US-GAAP, often IFRS). The number of reports does not affect this decision from my point of view as its the same, no matter which ledger is the leading one...
I am not familiar with inflation accounting but using asset accounting with derived depreciation area(s) which post the difference of (real-time) US-GAAP area (posted to all ledgers) and your local depr. area (to the ledger group needed) should work fine.
Set the derived depr. as a "real area" as a derived area does not provide the full (balance sheet) account determination functionality...
best regards, Christian

Choosing the leading ledger- non leading ledger New GL

Hi,
I am in a regional project in southamerica. We are goning to use New GL. We are going to have different companies for each country. The chart of account is going to be one which is usefull for all country (it has different group account for each country), we are also going to have a group chart of account for statement balance sheet. We have to report abroad by USGAAP, but locally by other rules. In the distant future we think to use consolidation.
We are going to define the leading ledger and the non leading ledger, but we have the following problems:
-Which one should be the leading ledger (USGAAP or local rules), because I need many reports for two rules.
-What should I consider for this decision?
-In case I choose the USGAAP as leading ledger, what functionality I am going to loose for local report, (inflation, some report, asset accounting (I need more than one depreciation area for local rules and in some countries the functionality of inflation, etc).
Thanks,
Cecilia
Edited by: Cecilia Penelas on Dec 6, 2010 6:18 PM

Hi,
I suggest to have leading ledger following group GAAP (inyour case US-GAAP, often IFRS). The number of reports does not affect this decision from my point of view as its the same, no matter which ledger is the leading one...
I am not familiar with inflation accounting but using asset accounting with derived depreciation area(s) which post the difference of (real-time) US-GAAP area (posted to all ledgers) and your local depr. area (to the ledger group needed) should work fine.
Set the derived depr. as a "real area" as a derived area does not provide the full (balance sheet) account determination functionality...
best regards, Christian

Line items posted through the non leading ledger

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for