Link contract with another PO line item condition

Hi
Need some solution for the following issue:
Explanation of the issue: First the contract is created for the freight and insurance for vendor say V1. Then the PO is created for the material for vendor V2. In the PO line item the freight and insurance is specified in different condition types. When specifying the cost for the freight and insurance they want to link it with the contract that was created with vendor V1. Is it possible to link the contract for freight and insurance with the PO line item cost?
Regards

Need solution

Similar Messages

  • PO line item condition to be linked with contract

    Hi
    In the PO line item condition tab the costs for freight, insurance are specified in different condition types. Moreover it is required  to create contracts for freight and insurance.When creating the material PO client wants to link the contract for the freifgt and insurance with this PO line item cost.
    How can the contract be linked with the PO line item condition?
    Regards

    I am not refering to the contract when creating the PO. The contract is created independently and the PO is created.
    Explanation of the issue: First the contract is created for the freight and insurance for vendor say V1. Then the PO is created for the material for vendor V2. In the PO line item the freight and insurance is specified in different condition types. When specifying the cost for the freight and insurance they want to link it with the contract that was created with vendor V1. Is it possible to link the contract for freight and insurance with the PO line item cost?
    Regards

  • New contract account for every line item in subscription order....

    Hi Guys,
    I am having a problem with the subscription order.
    Whenever I change the subscription order and add a line item to it, SAP by default  creates a new contract account for that line item. Whereas I want to assign the same contract account to the second line item also.
    Can you suggest me any solution for this problem?
    Thanks in advance...
    Regards,
    Abhay

    Hello Abhay,
    This is the normal and correct function for SAP. If you would like for the subscriptions to be on the same contract that you subscriber has, an enhancement has to be developed.
    We had a similar requirement and an enhancement was developed per specifications.
    Regards,

  • Need to prevent invoices with 0 price line items to accounting .

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement where in  I need to prevent the invoices with 0 price line items to accounting if item category is relevant for pricing.The invoices which have 0 price line items and item category has specific 0 price need not to be prevented  for accounting.
    Please provide your input to meet the requirement.
    Thanks In Advance.

    Hi,
    Please go through the below link !!! follow this and it will resolve ur issue
    Re: How to prevent invoices with 0 prices to be sent to accounting,
    Regards,
    Krishna O

  • Gr Ir Assignment Updation with PO and Line Item

    In the GL for GR IR Account the sort key was not  maintained with PO number due to which the assigment field in the line item was getting updated with the posting date and not with the PO & LIne Item details.
    We have made the requiste changes and new items are getting updated properly.
    But require assitance in updating the earlier line items.
    As of date total line items are more than  0.15 mn.
    Please suggest some method to automatically update the assigment field of the GR IR Line items with the PO Details.
    Regards
    Mukesh

    Hi,
    You can use a substitution to update the field through FI. Use GGB4 for wirting a substitution you may need some ABAP coding to substitute PO no and line items in the assignment field.  rule would be Co code =XXX and GL account =xxx and Posting date earlier than =xxxx  then concatenrate EBELN and EBELP in Assigment field Zounr.
    Then execute FBL3N and edit the assignment field by selecting all the documents and then save it you should see the PO line items populated. You can leave the substitution on or you can remove it after updating,
    Regards
    K.R

  • Post Invoice for Service Entry with many Service line item-MM-LIV

    Dear All,
    I have a problem to post Invoice for Service Entry with many Service line item. The problem is as follow:
    I have created 1 Service Entry which has 5 Service line item in it. Three of the service line item are subject to Value Added Tax (VAT), the others aren't. Then, i wanted to post Invoice for the Service Entry, however, it just display 1 item which amount in total. How can i segregate each service line item in Service Entry thus i can post Invoice for all Service line item with subject to VAT and all service item with not subject to VAT, if just 1 Service Entry created for it ?
    Please help me.
    Thank You

    Hi Ganda,
    If you mark the 'service based invoice verification' checkbox in your PO item, your service items will be in your invoice as seperate invoice lines. Then you can modify the taxcodes on service item level.
    Kind regards, Dick Hendriks.

  • SAPF150D-Dunning Notice Print - With Update of Line Items and Master Record

    When I am running this program SAPF150D(Dunning Notice Print - With Update of Line Items and Master Records) with a variant containing run date, runc id, update mode, pimmed & pcount; the job is failing to execute. It is giving message like,
    "The field symbol is no longer assigned because there was an attempt makde previously in a Unicode program to set the field symbol using ASSIGN with offset and/or length specification. Here, the memory addressed by the offset/length specification was not within the allowed area."
    "GETWA_NOT_ASSIGNED_RANGE" "SAPF150D" or "F150DFS0" "SORTFELDER_ERMITTELN"

    Hi,
    Search for routine FORM SORTFELDER_ERMITTELN
    in SAPF150D.
    Put a breakpoint in statement
    ASSIGN (T047F-FELDN) TO <H1>.
    in above routine and debug to the point where error is occuring.
    Most likely there is a mismatch in the length assigned to some field FELDN in table T047F.
    In that case, simply change the T047F-LENGT field accordingly in change mode.
    Cheers,
    Vikram
    Edited by: Vikram Jalali on May 27, 2008 5:56 PM

  • Service Procurement with Multiple Service Line items

    Dear Experts,
    We have the following Business Scenario. Request your inputs in addressing this issue.
    Business scenario : Most of the Procurement for our client is of services. So, we need to configure services with multiple service line items. This Shopping cart to create PR in ECC. PR to PO conversion to take place in ECC. Now onwards client needs Supplier integration for confirmation of services and sending invoices by Vendor.
    Guidance required in the following
    1 In Shop functionality if we select services, PR is being created in ECC with only one Service Line item. Whereas if we go for Request functionality, then always it is routing to Bidding process (which is not required for client). Can we create SC with multiple service line items with out request functionality?? Or Can we root the Request functionality with out Bidding process??
    2 If we convert the PR to PO in ECC (Classic Scenario), can we go for SUS integration. In such case which is the best way of supplier integration. Can you please guide us on basic steps on installation (can we go for different client in the same server) and configuration.
    Request your inputs in this regard
    Thank you,
    Ravi

    Hello,
    We suffered the same problem in our company.  We have found a way to work with the SRM shopping cart multiple line rollup to ECC single line purchase order.
    If the multiple shopping cart line items contain the same location code and cost assignment they will rollup into one ECC purchase order.  The system seems to 'think' it is helping you by consolidating your information.
    In the Basic Data section of the shopping cart there is a Service line item field.  If you enter something in each in that field for each line it will keep it's own line in ECC.
    Your implementation may differ slightly from ours but I recommend playing with the location code, cost assignment and Basic Data service line fields until you can see a pattern.  Basically you need to find a method to make each line a separate entity so they don't rollup.
    Good luck,
    Corinne

  • Function module for FI document change with G/L line items

    Hi!
    Does anybody know how to change FI document with G/L line items (fields like XREF3, SGTXT, ZUONR - generally speaking, all the fields can be changed with FB02)?
    FM FI_DOCUMENT_CHANGE has needed functionality and works well for account payables and account receivables line items, but it doesn't handle general ledger line items.
    Regards,
    Maxim.

    Hello!
    The function has some mandatory fields to use:
    I_AWTYP -> get value from BKPF-AWTYP for the specific document;
    I_AWREF -> number of the document to change;
    I_AWORG-> concatenate document's company with respective year;
    Then, only one of the following fields should be filled:
    i_lifnr,
    i_kunnr,
    i_obzei,
    i_buzei.
    You can find the relevant data for this fields in BSEG.
    The structure I_BSEGC should be filled with data you think appropriate. I didn't tested it, but i think the first fields are sufficient.
    Then, add lines (1 for each field you wish to change) in table T_ACCCHG.
    However, you should notice that you're not allowed to change all fields. For instance, KKBER is one of the fields that is forbidden to change in this FM.
    Hope that helps.
    Rui Delca Mendes

  • Can I use an iPhone from Verizon with a canceled contract on another Verizon line?

    My mother recently canceled her with Verizon Wireless because she wanted to be on our family share plan. My older brother decided that he wanted to get his own contract and left the line for her to take. She doesn't like the phone that he had and she has a brand new iphone that she got when she opened her contract. She still had a year to go but decided to pay the early termination fee. She still hasn't payed yet because she is waiting for the bill to make the last payment including the ETF. The service on the phone no longer work and she was wondering if she can connect that phone with that existing line on the family share plan. I also want to know if this has happened to you. I went with her when she went to canceled the contract, the lady that helped us was being so nice to the people before because they just got new phones/contracts. When my mom told her that she wanted to cancel the contract she started being so rude like we were asking her to give us something for free. With the previous customers she was being all smiles but with us she was like whatever. She barely answer some question that my mom had and when she did, she answer with an attitude. She was the same person that helped when my dad, my brothers and me went to get new phone and she was being so nice. I couldn't believe she was being so rude. That was the worst customer service I have in Verizon. Its like they love you when you decide to get into a new contract but the minute you decide to cancel one its like you are beneath or that they could care less about what you want. Has this happened to any of you? Thank for your answer I really appreciate it. 

    AFTER she pays her bill in full, the device should be usable.

  • Issue with linking Activity to predecessor Document Line Item

    Hi,
    We are trying to create an Activity and programatically link it to the line item of the predecessor Document ( Complaint transaction). The predecessor document number and line item should show up in the 'Relationships' tab of the activity. When this is done manually, it automatically generates a link in the document flow at Header level linking the Activity to the Header of the Complaint.
    However, we are unable to generate this link programatically and we are either able to link the document only to the Complaint Header, or if we link to Item, it does not show the apropriate link in Doc flow of the Activity. Also, the Activity does not show up in the Tasks tab at Item level of Complaint - which happens when we save the data manually.
    Any clues regarding what can be done to link document at Item level will be highly appreciated!
    Thanks,
    Ipshita

    Ipshita,
    If you are using the FM BAPI_ACTIVITYCRM_CREATEMULTI to create the Activity, then pass the Guid to the Doc flow parameter. The sample code to add the doc_flow is as below:
    Document flow-Opportunity
          gs_docflow_bapi-ref_guid   = gs_activity_bapi-guid.
          gs_docflow_bapi-objkey_a   = gc_op_guid.
          gs_docflow_bapi-objtype_a  = c_obj_typ1.                      "'BUS2000111'. (say Opportunity)
          gs_docflow_bapi-objkey_b   = gs_activity_bapi-guid.
          gs_docflow_bapi-reltype    = c_vona.                          "'VONA'.
          gs_docflow_bapi-ref_kind   = c_ref_kind.                      "'A'.
          gs_docflow_bapi-brel_kind  = c_rel_kind.                      "'A'.
    APPEND gs_docflow_bapi TO gt_docflow_bapi.
    Create Activity
            CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_ACTIVITYCRM_CREATEMULTI'
              TABLES
                header          = gt_activity_bapi
                headerx         = gt_activity_bapix
                document_flow   = gt_docflow_bapi
                created_process = gt_created_process
                return          = gt_return2.
    Commit Work
              CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
                EXPORTING
                  wait = 'X'.
    Hope this works for you.
    Regards,
    Shyamak

  • Contract with different plant specific freight conditions

    Contract with Vendor ABC has 5 line items
    Line item 1 & 2 for plant 123
    Line item 3 is for plant 345
    Line item 1,2,4 & 5 for plant 567
    For plant 123, the Carrier is ASDF Trucking Co and the charges are $500 per trip.
    For plant 345, no freight
    For plant 567, the carrier is LKJH Trucking Co and the charges are $700 per trip.
    When we create a PO with reference to the above contract for plant 123 for Line item 1 alone, the freight should be $500 per trip.
    When we create a PO with reference to the above contract for plant 123 for Line item 2 alone, the freight should be $500 per trip.
    When we create a PO with reference to the above contract for plant 123 for Line items 1& 2 the freight should be $500 per trip.
    When we create a PO with reference to the above contract for plant 567 for Line items 1& 2 the freight should be $700 per trip.
    How to create such a contract? Do i need to do some config to freight condtion types (pricing procedure)?

    Hi
    You can create this with std configuration itself.
    While creating the Contract, please don't give Plant at the item overview.Just enter the line items and Quantities.
    <b>You can maintian the plant specific condition for each line items.</b>
    1.When maintaining the centrally agreed contract, choose Edit -> Plant conditions -> Overview.
    2.On the overview screen that then appears, enter the desired plant and choose  Plant prices.
    3.An item overview screen appears, starting from which you can maintain conditions.
    4.Choose Item -> Conditions to access the condition maintenance screen.
    Return to the overview and repeat the process for all plants for which you wish to store plant-specific conditions.Save your input.
    Regards
    Ramakrishna

  • PO line item condition not getting changed

    I am trying to change one condition in PO line item via BAPI_PO_CHANGE. It is not getting changed.
    But the return message says Ind. limited tend PO 7100076060 changed, S (type),06 (ID), 023(Number).
    The code is
    zpo_cond-condition_no  =  itab-knumv. (1001384871)
    zpo_condx-condition_no =  itab-knumv.(1001384871)
    zpo_cond-cond_st_no   =  itab-stunr.(960)
    zpo_condx-cond_st_no  =  itab-stunr.(960)
    zpo_condx-cond_st_nox = 'X'.
    zpo_cond-cond_count   =  itab-zaehk .(01)
    zpo_condx-cond_count  =  'X'.
    zpo_cond-itm_number   = itab-ebelp.(000010)
    zpo_condx-itm_number  = itab-ebelp.(000010)
    zpo_condx-itm_numberx = 'X'.
    zpo_cond-cond_type  =  itab-kschl.(ZI%)
    zpo_condx-cond_type  = 'X'.
    zpo_cond-cond_value =  p_per.(6.000000000)
    zpo_condx-cond_value =  'X'.
    zpo_cond-cond_p_unt  = punit .
    zpo_condx-cond_p_unt = 'X'.
    zpo_cond-cond_unit =  unit.
    zpo_condx-cond_unit = 'X'.
    zpo_cond-change_id = 'U'.
    zpo_condx-change_id = 'X'.
    APPEND zpo_cond.
    APPEND zpo_condx.
          CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PO_CHANGE'
             EXPORTING
               purchaseorder                = zpo_header-po_number
               poheader                     = zpo_header
               poheaderx                    = zpo_headerx
            TABLES
              return                        = l_return
              poitem                        = zpo_item
              poitemx                       = zpo_itemx
               pocond                       =  zpo_cond
               pocondx                      =  zpo_condx  .

    Hi,
    1)In po item give a unique no.(ex:0010) & ITEMX as a new line item with same no will be created.
    2) service No. will be system generated. Pass packno = variable(ex:= '0000000001' ),
    subpackno=variable +1 (ex: '0000000002' )
    thanks & regards.

  • Problem in line item conditions

    Hi Guru's,
    i have a problem in po at item level condition,actually in line item system repeating one condition twice,for exp if condition PB00 is there in pricing procedure then after giving certain value say Rs 100,it is again displaying condition PB00 with value zero.as per my knowladge either problem is in pricing procedure in custamizing or there are two valid condition records for same condition type which is not possible,actually i am a SD CONSULTANT, can anyone tell me the possible reason.
    Thanks

    Hi Ganti,
    Thanks for replying so quick.I got 7 items in my PO,only one item is got this problem,as i am a sd consutant i know about information record, but in mm i don't know much.Can you please explain more about this(tcode for info rec).
    Thanks

  • Delivery of Contract Quantity after Order Line Item Rejection

    Hi,
    We have following scenario:
    The Sales Order (100 units) is created with reference to Contract (500 units) and then partially delivered (95 units).
    As the small residual of 5 units is remaining so we have put reson for rejection for line item.
    When we try to create new Order with reference to Contract then system is considering the 500 units again. Actually as per contract, system should consider 405 units (500 in contract - 95 already delivered)
    Also if we will not reject the line item then 5 units will not be considered for delivery.
    We would like to design the solution wherein we can deliver all 500 units.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Sameer

    Hi Sameer ,
    The described case is part of standard behavior. Look below the exaplanation:
    The open quantity of a contract is calculated only from the ordered   
    quantity. It does not consider the delivered quantity.                                                                               
    When you set the reason for rejection, it means that this order is not 
    related to the contract. So the copied quantity is set to zero.        
    If you wish that the relation to the contract remains,                 
    you should reduce the order quantity to the delivered quantity.                                                                               
    So if you create a sales order with reference to a contract and you    
    enter a reason for rejection in the sales order we reopen the quantity 
    in the contract. We suppose that the customer wants to get these       
    quantities at a later time.                                                                               
    In both cases, our suggestion is the following:                        
    instead of rejecting the sales order item or set delivery tolerance,   
    you should decrease order quantity directly,                           
    so that delivery quantity= sales order item quantity.    
    I hope it clarifies the situation.
    regards
    Ruy Castro

Maybe you are looking for