Link vlan between 2 SG200 switches

Hi,
Trying to figure this one out...
I have 2 SG200 50port switches connected together by fibre modules on port 50. The fibre is linking the switches between different buildings.
I'm hoping to create the following connection route...
Device -- SG200 Switch B Port 25 -- SG200 Switch B Fibre Port 50 ---Fibre Cable Between Buildings--- SG200 Switch A Fibre Port 50 -- SG200 Switch A Port 25 -- Cisco RV320 Router Port 3
All ports are on the same vlan (20), untagged.
Ultimately I'm trying to achieve a direct connection between 'Device' and 'RV320 router port 3', and have 'Device' pick up the DHCP configured for port 3's vlan (20).
I've tried different configs of tagged and untagged, but no luck.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks

Hi Iamael,
Thanks for getting back to me.
Only ports 25 and 50 on both SG200 switches are on vlan20. All other ports are on the default vlan.
I can't seem to achieve 20U on those 4 ports... only 20UP. The tick box to disable PVID is greyed out.
Is the SG200 capable of routing vlan traffic between ports? Or would an SG300 L3 switch be required?
Many thanks

Similar Messages

VLAN between SFE2000P switches

Dear friends,
I've connected two sites with the following configuration:
Site 1:
Stack Linksys SFE2000P - Firmware version 1.0.0.X
Port 1/g3 connected to a FO link to site 2
Oficina 2:
Stack Linksys SFE2000P - Firmware version 3.0.0.X
Port 1/g3 connected to a FO link to site1
I've tried to create a VLAN to communicate only a few ports of both sites:
4/e23 y 4/e24 of site 1
7/e23 y 7/e24 of site 2
To do this, I tried the following:
Port 1/g3 (site1) -> VLAN 50 (tagged) - Trunk
Port 1/g3 (site 2) -> VLAN 50 (tagged) - Trunk
Port 4/e23 y 4/e24 (site1) -> VLAN 50 (untagged)
Port 7/e23 y 7/e24 (site 2) -> VLAN 50 (untagged)
It doesn't work!!!. In the same stack of each site it works without problems. Could you help me??? There is some misconfiguration???
I've stablished other VLANs between Linksys and 3Com Switches, but now it doesn't work at all.
Thanks in advance!

I Did find a same article on this forum. Maybe this would help you. an article coming from GV.
* access mode: an access mode port connects to a normal device like a desktop, printer, or similar. An access mode port can be member of a single VLAN only, i.e. you have to decide to which VLAN it is supposed to belong to. In your case, you configure an access mode port for either VLAN 10 or VLAN 20.
With a single switch things are clear now: some ports are VLAN 10 and some ports are VLAN 20. VLAN 10 can talk to each other. VLAN 20 can talk to each other. No traffic passes between VLAN 10 and VLAN 20.
Of course, now you want to connect this switch to some other network devices, in particular the second SRW because you need additional ports or you have an additional location. And there is the ASA which provides internet access for these VLANs.
* trunk mode: This is where trunk mode comes in. A trunk mode port can carry multiple VLANs on a single port. This is done using 802.1q tags. 802.1q tagged ethernet frames have an additional field for the VLAN to which the frame belongs to. With this, a switch can send frames for VLAN 10 and VLAN 20 through a single port to another switch or router. Each frame sent is tagged with 10 or 20 depending on which VLAN the frame belongs to. The receiver will accept each frame and assign it to the corresponding VLAN on the receiving side. This way the receiving switch or router is able to keep those VLANs strictly separated.
So let's say you want two VLANs 10 & 20 in your network. You would create VLANs 10 & 20 on your ASA and both SRWs. (Create only means that the device knows this VLAN exists and is able to handle traffic for this VLAN). You would configure LAN port 1 of your ASA as trunk with members VLAN 10 & 20. You configure port 1 & 24 of your first SRW in trunk mode with members VLAN 10 & 20. You configure port 1 of your second SRW in trunk mode with members VLAN 10 & 20. Now you wire port 1 of your ASA to port 1 of your first SRW. Then you wire port 24 of your first SRW to port 1 of your second SRW.
This creates the VLAN trunk through your network. Traffic in both VLANs can travel through this trunk between the switches and to the ASA and from there, if properly routed, into the internet.
here is the Link
As the SFE2000P is now part of Cisco Small Business I would recommend you ask your question in the Cisco Small Business Support Community. There are a few Cisco people over there which maybe able to reproduce your problem in a lab environment and check with the developers...

Link aggregated between NAS and a switch: the Mac as a very slow access...

Hello,
in my Office we're working with Macs and PCs and all the data is on a NAS.
Here is our configuration:
NAS <-link1->Switch<-Link2->Macs or PC.
Macs are connected with AFP protocol (because SMB is very slow).
We want to use Link Aggregation between the NAS and the switch (with 802.3ad procotol) but when we do that all the Macs have a very slow access to the NAS. But all is OK with the PCs.
What can we do? Is there a problem with macOS X and link aggregation?
Thank you for your help.
Nicolas

Sorry, not sure what the question is exactly.
You must have an Xserve, or Ethernet cards capable of Jumbo Frames for one, I assume the Switch & NAS are capable?
Possible clues...
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=ServerAdmin/10.4/en/c3ha3.html
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1715388&tstart=0
http://www.macnn.com/articles/04/06/21/link.aggregation.for.macs/
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30556/53/
http://www.afp548.com/forum/viewtopic.php?showtopic=8309

How to "trunk" VLANs between Switches in a Gigastack

I got 3 catalyst 3548XL daisy chained by CX_GIGASTACK modules (half duplex). The 1. switch is connected to a L3 swicth via a trunk. On the 2. and 3. switch connected to the first vis gigastack modules, is it possible 2 have 2 VLANs passing the gigastack links to the 1. Switch?

Hello,
Thanks for your answer. Yes it answers my question - which I admit was not very clear, I was in a hurry. My concern was when the Gigastack module was in half duplex mode, then I was uncertain if it could be configured as trunk. As you se I managed to do that,
Floor1#sh int status | incl Gi0/1
Gi0/1 connected trunk a-half a-1000 1000BaseCX Gigastack
In fact, I was'nt successful until I configured "switchport nonegotiate"
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
Once again THANKS.
Simon

VLAN between two Cisco 300 switches

Is it possible to share a VLAN between two Cisco 300 series switches?

Make sure that your port 27 is NOT configured as an access port - it should be a trunk (that's the default). I believe the setting is under VLAN Management > Interface settings.
Also ensure you are setup to tag frames (under the "Port to VLAN" settings).

VLAN problems with SG200-8P and Cisco ASA 5505 (Sec Plus license)

Hi, I've been pulling my hair out trying to get simple vlan trunking working between these devices.
Basically, no clients on VLAN 99 (guest) will receive DHCP ip addresses when plugged into the SG200. I have the SG200<>ASA VLAN trunk configured correctly, as I know it, and I've tried numerous variations (set trunk as general tag/untagged, etc., set the ap port to general tag/untag, etc). Both AP's work properly when connected to the ASA e0/3 port but either will only pull the "inside" VLAN dhcp address when connected to the SG200 switch
VLAN 1 - inside (has separate dhcp scope assigned by ASA)
VLAN 99 - guest (has separate dhcp scope assigned by ASA)
SG200
purpose
ASA 5505 (Sec Plus license)
purpose
g2
Trunk 1UP,99T
Ubiquiti AP (VLAN 1 works, VLAN 99 does not
g3
Access port 99T
vlan 99 does not work
g8
Trunk 1UP, 99T
< Trunk between switch and ASA >
Int e0/2
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,99
switchport trunk native vlan 1
switchport mode trunk
Int e0/3
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,99
switchport trunk native vlan 1
switchport mode trunk
Second ubiquiti AP
Both VLAN 1 and VLAN 99 clients work properly

Frustrated - yes. Confused - maybe not as much, but I could have put some more effort into the overall picture.
There are two VLANs (1 - native) and (99 - guest). There is a trunk port between the SG200 and the ASA configured as 1-untagged 99 - tagged.
No clients connected to the SG200 on VLAN 99 are able to access the ASA VLAN 99 using either a static VLAN IP address or DHCP. The problem occurs whether I configure the SG200 with an access port 99-tagged or Trunk port 1UP, 99T or general port 1U, 99UP or any combination thereof.
Anything connected to the SG200 on the native VLAN works properly.
Anything connected to the ASA VLANs (1 or 99) works properly
I have not yet tried to see what the switch is doing with the VLAN tags but I suspect I have some mismatch with the Linksys/Cisco SG200 way of setting up a VLAN and how traditional Cisco switches work.
I was hoping someone with a working SG200 - Cisco ASA setup could share their port/trunk/VLAN settings or perhaps point me in the right direction.
SG200 g2 - trunk port (1UP, 99T) -- Access Point
SG200 g2 - access port (99U)
SG200 g8 - trunk port (1UP, 99T) connected to ASA5505 e0/3
ASA5505 e0/3 (switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,99, switchport trunk native vlan 1, switchport mode trunk)
Thanks,

Passing voice and data Vlans on Cisco SG200-08P help

Hello All,
I'm struggling with a configuration issue on the Cisco SG200-08P.
We are using the Cisco SG200-08P on a mobile cart that will go from class room to class room that will have computer and cisco Voip phone plugged into it. The issue is that each of our closets are in differnt VLANS ( 1 voice and 1 data....lets say data vlan 20 and voice vlan 2025 for conversation) and that we route to each closet.
It would be great if I could just create a generic data and voice vlan to dynamically pick up what the upstream switch has however, it seems that I've been unsuccessful in doing so.
So far I can pass the data Vlan no probablem. The upstream switch port is set to access port and a switch port access voice vlan (these are 3750x switches)
If the above is not possible I guess I will take what I can get. Should I just create data vlan 20 and voice vlan2025 on the Cisco SG200-08P and make a trunk port on the Cisco SG200-08P and a trunk on the 3750x? Is there an option on the Cisco SG200-08P to tag voice traffic?
I'm also concerned with VTP and I did not see an area in the Cisco SG200-08P to set that as a client and transparent mode.
Thanks for any help,
Dan

On a Catalyst switch, when a port is defined as a trunk without a vlan specified on the port, all vlan pass through the port. On a small business switch it is nearly the opposite. You must specify the vlans on the links. Additionally, ingress filter discards anything not associated to the port.
802.1q specifies there must be an untagged vlan which is the native vlan (of course you can make exceptions, tagging the default vlan..).
One thing I did in the past with a 2960, I made an LLDP network policy and it basically "provisioned" the downstream switch connecting link and voice vlan. That may be another idea for you.
Here's a link that may be useful-
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3811376
Here is the 2960 config I used to feed a SB switch voice info
Switch#show run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2206 bytes
! Last configuration change at 00:41:16 UTC Mon Mar 1 1993
version 12.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname Switch
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
no aaa new-model
system mtu routing 1500
vtp mode transparent
network-policy profile 1
voice vlan 100 cos 4
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
vlan 2
name test
vlan 100
lldp run
interface FastEthernet0/1
network-policy 1
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet0/2
interface FastEthernet0/3
interface FastEthernet0/4
interface FastEthernet0/5
interface FastEthernet0/6
interface FastEthernet0/7
interface FastEthernet0/8
interface FastEthernet0/9
interface FastEthernet0/10
interface FastEthernet0/11
interface FastEthernet0/12
interface FastEthernet0/13
interface FastEthernet0/14
interface FastEthernet0/15
interface FastEthernet0/16
interface FastEthernet0/17
interface FastEthernet0/18
interface FastEthernet0/19
interface FastEthernet0/20
interface FastEthernet0/21
interface FastEthernet0/22
interface FastEthernet0/23
interface FastEthernet0/24
interface FastEthernet0/25
interface FastEthernet0/26
interface FastEthernet0/27
interface FastEthernet0/28
interface FastEthernet0/29
interface FastEthernet0/30
interface FastEthernet0/31
interface FastEthernet0/32
interface FastEthernet0/33
interface FastEthernet0/34
interface FastEthernet0/35
interface FastEthernet0/36
interface FastEthernet0/37
interface FastEthernet0/38
interface FastEthernet0/39
interface FastEthernet0/40
interface FastEthernet0/41
interface FastEthernet0/42
interface FastEthernet0/43
interface FastEthernet0/44
interface FastEthernet0/45
interface FastEthernet0/46
interface FastEthernet0/47
interface FastEthernet0/48
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
switchport mode trunk
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
interface Vlan1
no ip address
interface Vlan100
no ip address
ip http server
ip http secure-server
logging esm config
line con 0
line vty 5 15
end
Switch#
-Tom
Please mark answered for helpful posts

Vlan between 2950 and 3550

We are attempting to setup an additional VLAN between a 2950 and a 3550. There are 2 connections between the switches using the GI0/1 and 2 interfaces. One is set to Static Access on the current vlan and the other is set to Trunk Desirable for all other traffic. We need to add the additional VLAN using one of the existing links between the two switches. We have spare ports on both switches but have limited knowledge of configuration required. Not sure if further info is required but happy to provide.

You can find lot of information on this link
http://cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk390/tech_configuration_examples_list.html

VLAN : Cannot transfer files switch 3500XL

Hello,
i have configured VLAN's on my switch(802.1q ) with a linux machine as a router.and i cannot transfer files through SCP or FTP from nodes.It pings but is not able to transfer files.can u please expain ? the network cards on my linux machine are intel pro 100

If you can ping through the linux router from one VLAN to another then this would suggest that routing is working correctly.
I would check whether the Linux machine is using IP chains or similar which i believe is software that provides a firewall function and could potentially be blocking various ports.
How many VLANs are you routing between, the reason i ask is that you mentioned 802.1q which is used for trunking VLANs over a single link. How does this fit in with Linux as i wouldn't have thought a Linux machine can differentiate between 802.1q and non 802.1q frames.
HTH
PJD

Vlan on SRW2048 web switch

I would like to set up a VLan on a SRW2048 Web Managed Switch to accomplish the following:
Use two ports on the SRW2048 to pass traffic directly between two other switches located at different locations on our LAN. Although I have no experience with VLans, I assume that a Vlan offers a chance to accomplish this goal.

Since you did not specifically mentioned on what goal do you want to achieve, please create your VLAN and see if VLAN will work for your network.
To understand more of these, you may visit the link below:
http://linksys.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/linksys.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=15746&p_created=1196...

Vtp between 2 Catalyst switches across a router

I have in my domain :
C3750 ---.1Q G0/1---C2821 ISR---.1Q G0/2 --- C2950
C3750 is in vtp server mode
C2821 is in vtp transparent mode
C2950 is in vtp client mode
Will my vlans be distributed from C3750 to C2950 across ?

Hi,
Thanks for reply.
I thought that VTP could be forwarded across c2821 but it doesn't work like a switch/router such as C3750 in vtp transparent mode.
I suppose that C2821 has not the same switching backplane architecture than C3750.
I put a trunk link cable between c3750 and c2924
and set both in the same vtp domain.
Then now I get all my level 2 vlans on C2924, but they can be routed at IP level by C2821 or C3750.

Link b/w router and switch

I am useing 2600 series router and trying to link it with a 2950 switch,
2950 switch is attached with a internet connection & layer 3 switches, 2600 series router is connecting with 2950 at the client permises, what will be the port configuration at both 2950 & 2600 series devices,
currently i configure sw mod trunk at 2950,
and IP at the fastethernet port of 2600 series router.
But when ever i try to telnet the router it cannot telnet

What VLAN are the devices from which you wish to telnet to the router ?
You need to configure the router as follows:
interface fastethernet0/1.10
encapsulation dot1q
ip address
Where VLAN is the VLAN you want to get to the router from ...
Pls do remember to rate posts.
Paresh

MDS DS-SFP-FC8 GLW 9 Micron between 2 9148 switches Max DB loss?

Does anyone know where to find a table that would indciate what the max acceptable DB loss would be between two 9148 switches utilizing
DS-SFP-FC8 GLW over 9 Micron cable.
It seems the SFP product data sheets do not provide this type of data.
I currently have two 9148 switches running at 8Gbps
TE link 1 is up and running at 8Gbps with 32 bb credits assigned to the port.
TE link 2 will not stay online at any speed 2-8Gbps with 32 to 64 credits assigned. I'm fairly certain this is a DB loss problem becuase the problem follows the cable path.
What I'm trying to resolve is how to determine what the max DB loss is over the link.
I understand the max distance for Dark fiber is as follows: 1310nm SMF 9.0 8.Gbps 10 km (6.2 mi)
So when I talk to folks that analyze the cables I can be eductaed on what the max DB loss is.
1310 SMF9.0 8.500 10 km (6.2 mi)
DB loss is as follows for TE link 1
Cable ID: 09 990
OTDR End1 PASSDate / Time: 10/02/2012 02:55:39pm
Cable Type: OS1 Singlemode
Tester: OptiFiber (9053014 V2.6.4)
Module: OFTM-5630 (9055001 V2.6.4)
Overall Length: 3706.8 ft
PASS
Overall Loss
PASS
1550 nm: 1.19 dB
PASS
ORL: < 32.32 dB1310 nm (n=1.4660) 1550 nm (n=1.4670)
Location Loss Status Loss Status
(ft) (dB) (dB)
0.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
73.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A
246.1 0.30 N/A 0.74 N/A
334.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A
429.4 0.05 N/A N/A N/A
496.9 0.07 N/A N/A N/A
3573.9 0.48 N/A -0.01 N/A
3706.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A
OTDR End2 PASSDate / Time: 10/02/2012 01:51:32pm
Cable Type: OS1 Singlemode
Tester: OptiFiber (9053014 V2.6.4)
Module: OFTM-5630 (9055001 V2.6.4)
Overall Length: 3878.2 ft
PASS
Overall Loss
1310 nm: 1.24 dB
PASS
1550 nm: 0.80 dB
PASS
ORL: < 31.53 dBWARNING:
- Negative Loss value found in test result.1310 nm (n=1.4660) 1550 nm (n=1.4670)
Location Loss Status Loss Status
(ft) (dB) (dB)
0.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
137.9 0.65 N/A 0.61 N/A
3464.1 -0.72 N/A N/A N/A
3612.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A
3640.2 1.00 N/A N/A N/A
3707.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A
3776.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
3812.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A
3878.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Thanks,
Mike
OTDR End2 PASSDate / Time: 10/02/2012 01:55:57pm
Cable Type: OS1 Singlemode
Tester: OptiFiber (9053014 V2.6.4)
Module: OFTM-5630 (9055001 V2.6.4)
Overall Length: 3706.4 ft
PASS
Overall Loss
1310 nm: 1.34 dB
PASS
1550 nm: 0.79 dB
PASS
ORL: < 34.25 dB1310 nm (n=1.4660) 1550 nm (n=1.4670)
Location Loss Status Loss Status
(ft) (dB) (dB)
0.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
138.0 0.46 N/A 0.17 N/A
303.8 N/A N/A 0.26 N/A
3464.5 0.47 N/A N/A N/A
3611.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A
3641.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
3706.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Notice the 3.42 db loss overall loss occurs on the failing side of the cable link.
Cable ID: 09 990
OTDR End1 PASSDate / Time: 10/02/2012 02:57:16pm
Cable Type: OS1 Singlemode
Tester: OptiFiber (9053014 V2.6.4)
Module: OFTM-5630 (9055001 V2.6.4)
Overall Length: 3884.5 ft
PASS
Overall Loss
1310 nm: 3.42 dB
PASS
1550 nm: 0.75 dB
PASS
ORL: < 30.99 dB1310 nm (n=1.4660) 1550 nm (n=1.4670)
Location Loss Status Loss Status
(ft) (dB) (dB)
0.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
73.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A
142.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A
245.7 0.04 N/A N/A N/A
331.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A
419.0 1.27 N/A N/A N/A
488.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A
501.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A
586.2 0.55 N/A N/A N/A
673.0 0.47 N/A N/A N/A
766.1 0.21 N/A N/A N/A
855.4 -0.01 N/A N/A N/A
959.0 0.19 N/A N/A N/A
3573.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A
3706.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A
3794.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A
3884.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A
1310 nm: 1.18 dB

I believe you run 'show interface fc x/y transceiver detail', it will provide the current light levels as well as the minimum and maximum limits.
Thank You,
Dan Laden

Etherchannel between two 2950 switches

I have a etherchannel defined between 2 L2 switches using LACP as shown below. The etherchannel works fine, however when I hard code speed/duplex on both ends the etherchannel fails. What is causing this behaviour?
SW02:
interface Port-channel5
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 5 mode active
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 5 mode active
SW02:
interface Port-channel5
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 5 mode active
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 5 mode active

Thank you for the rating.
Regarding your replacement scenario, I'll give the standard engineering answer ("it depends"), but actually follow up with something I hope is more helpful. I'm sincerely interested to see other's viewpoint on this as well, as it has changed over the years.
Many years ago (let's say a decade) I ran into problems with some devices not being able to auto-negotiate properly. There was a tendancy for devices to fail or negotiate to half-duplex mode when a full-duplex connection was warranted. At the time, the problems we experienced were mainly with traffic shaping devices and some other gear. There were others using fixed settings as a standard practice, and we did the same since we had verifiable issues.
Fast forward to now. I personally have not experienced auto-negotiation problems in a long time and am reading more from others in the field that auto-negotiation is the way to go (such as from the link provided). Indeed, I've now run into the opposite scenario: I had a particular situation where a link between two devices defaulted to half-duplex EVEN THOUGH they were both set to 100/Full. It turned out to be a race condition between a device and a Cisco router...the other device booted faster, didn't see anything on the link, and "helpfully" dropped down to half-duplex. I confirmed the issue with the device vendor, who recommended setting ports to auto-negotiate as the fix (their software would not be updated for a bit of time).
I would recommend auto-negotiate as a standard practice, with the exception of areas where you have encountered specific problems. Those latter cases should be caught through your pre-deployment testing, and discussed with the respective vendors so that you fully understand why the devices are behaving the way they are so that the proper mitigation measures can be put in place (i.e. - It is going to act the same way every time, and you can work with that).
Good luck! -Ed

Extending VLANs over an unmanaged switch

We have a network which consists of primarily Cisco 3560X switches and Meraki MR34 wireless access points. We have a handful of VLANs setup. In one instance, a WAP was plugged into an unmanaged SD100D-08 switch. I would have expected this to "break" our wireless access. However, it appears everything is working as we'd want.
The switchport on the 3560X that the unmanaged switch is connected to is configured as a trunk port with the default VLAN of 1. No matter which SSID/VLAN we connect to on the Meraki Access Points, we get assigned a proper IP in the VLAN that we'd expect. If we connect a computer to the unmanaged switch, it gets an IP from VLAN 1, just as we would have wanted.
Why is this working? I thought the unmanaged switch would drop all packets with VLAN headers?

Thanks for the quick response Jon. I have continued with my testing and connected two 3560X switches together with the same unmanaged switch in between them. I configured the 3560X ports as trunk ports and am able to pass all VLANs between the two 3560X switches with the unmanaged switch in between.
As you stated, it looks like the unmanaged switch is capable of handling the VLAN tagged frames and passing them out all connected ports.
Obviously this configuration is not best practice, but I guess it is pretty cool it's working that way.
Jason

Link vlan between 2 SG200 switches

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for