Linksys RV042 Dual Wan with Load Balancing Help?

Good day,
I'm a newbie to routers. I have purchased a Linksys RV042 hoping I could connect my two modem and provide internet to my collegues in the camp. My internet connection is running under EAP-TLS using a Motorola modem from Go Telecom here in Saudi Arabia. Need help to configure the router to accept the two modem.
Thanks for the reply.....

Hello David,
Glad you could spend some time with my problem. Tried the solution you sent but still unsuccesful to connect to internet. Is there something wrong with the WAN credentials I'm using? Do I have to switch the mode from Gateway to Router? Please take a look at my WAN1 values that I wrote in the RV042
I am using a Motorola CPE outdoor Wimax modem from GO Telacom here in Saudi Arabia...

Similar Messages

Cisco RV042 - Dual Wan Load Balancing - Secure Site (HTTPS) Trouble

PID VID :
RV042 V03
Firmware Version :
v4.0.0.07-tm (Aug 19 2010 19:19:50)
Ever since I setup my RV042 with load balancing using the Dual Wan system I have had trouble staying connected to some secure sites. After doing some searching I found that the potential issue is the IP change mid session.
"http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/r25537589-Cisco-RV042-can-not-use-load-balancing-for-some-web-sites"
Although my interface is significantly different I was able to find the same area in my RV042 admin area however, it doesn't seem to work.
System Management
> Dual Wan
In Wan 1 & Wan 2 I have HTTPS and HTTPS Secondary all forwarded to use Wan 2 under Protocol Binding
This however has not managed to do anything at all for my network and every computer conneceted experiences the same HTTPS irregularities at some websites.
I'm sure I must be doing something wrong, but I don't know what it is.
Both incoming connections are from the same service provider although the plans are different.
Any help with this would greatly help me stop losing my mind trying to fight with my website control panel for 10 minutes to just login and get something done.
Thanks

Any ideas or advice from anyone?

System with load balancing server

Hi All,
We are having SAP NW 7.0 Portal and back end we have R3 implemented in a cluster environment. The system object in EP have used "System with Load balancing" template; using the LOGON group and the other related parameters.
But we have some problem with the ITS and WAS parameters; since we are using some Transaction iViews.
Let me explain.. for the R3 cluster we have 2 systems PROD1.domain.ext and PROD2.domain.ext. Now in the system object in portal, how to specify the parameters for ITS and WAS parameters? Since the host name in these we need to specify a single server which defeats the basic purpose of having clustered environment.
Can any one please help in resolving this issue.
Thanks,
Sravanthi

Hi Sravanthi,
Please check the below for finding ITS and WAS parameters from backend :
For ITS - Go to SE37 >> Utilities >> Setting >> Click on ICON Right Top Corner in popup window >> Select Internet Transaction Server >> you will find the Standard Path and HTTP URL.
For WAS - Go to SE37 >> Run FM - RSBB_URL_PREFIX_GET >> Execute it >> you will find PRefix and PAth paramter for WAS.
Please refer to this may help step-by-step : How-to create a portal system for using it in Visual Composer
Hope it helps
Regards
Arun

Moving SMTP server to Azure with Load balancer

How to
move SMTP server to Azure with Load balancer???

Hi TechM,
Base on my experience, Windows Azure Platform does not provide out-of-the-box mail server (neither SMTP nor POP3). You could use SendGrid to sent mail. About this issue, I recommend you could refer to
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10631585/email-sending-approaches and
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/patrick_butler_monterde/archive/2010/10/11/sending-e-mail-from-windows-azure-part-1-of-2.aspx
Hope it helps.
Will
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

OCS on a cluster with Load balancing and fail safe environment

Dear all,
i want to ask is there any documat or hints on how to do an OCS R2 installaiotn on 3 server with RAC option (clustered Fail Safe), how can i install OCS on a cluster with Load balancing and fail safe environment.
plz i need ur help
thanking u
[email protected]

Dear all,
i want to ask is there any documat or hints on how to do an OCS R2 installaiotn on 3 server with RAC option (clustered Fail Safe), how can i install OCS on a cluster with Load balancing and fail safe environment.
plz i need ur help
thanking u
[email protected]

Error in creation of JCO with Load balancing server

Hi,
We are using a ABAP user base for our WEBAS server 6.40 (with ABAP+JAVA). i have created a Public group in concerned ECC 5.0 system. I have already configured SLD, and then i maintain data supplier bridge in SLD and run RZ70 in ECC 5.0 system to load system information.. i can see details in SLD ..
now i am trying to create JCO connections .. here i am unable to create JCO with load balancing option.. i get
com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (102) RFC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION: Connect to message server host failed Connect_PM TYPE=B MSHOST=<servername> GROUP=PUBLIC R3NAME=SID MSSERV=sapms<SID> PCS=1 ERROR service 'sapms<SID>' unknown TIME Fri Jun 16 12:41:20 2006 RELEASE 640 COMPONENT NI (network interface) VERSION 37 RC -3 MODULE ninti.c LINE 505 DETAIL NiPGetServByName2: service 'sapms<SID>' not found SYSTEM CALL getservbyname_r COUNTER 1
i am able to create single server JCO, but it fails in load balancing.. is there anything i have missed out in settings...
Thanks and regards,
Sudhir

Thanks, Bogdan Rokosa
I have the same problem,and solved it following the steps provided by Bogdan Rokosa :
you must insert an entry for your R3 system
(like: sapms<SID> 3600/tcp)
in services file
(C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc\services) on Java WAS.
I test the Jco successful without restart J2EE Engine.

Trouble in a SAP system with load balancing

Hello masters:
I had a trouble with workitems that came from a SAP system with load balancing. They doesn't receive the workitem ID in the UWL.
I created another system in the portal as a "dedicated application server", and made the necessary configuration in order to replace the first one, and then my workitems worked fine.
However, I would like to know what appened with the first system created as "system with load balancing". Why this system didn´t pass the workitem ID to the application (web dynpro abap) that execute the workitems?
Thank you.

I hope there was some missing configuration in the first case which was not replicating the workitem from SAP Inbox to UWL.
Thanks
Arghadip

HTTPS with load balancing

Hi guys,
We have a portal system with instance 08, so we typically connect to the portal using port 50800 for HTTP, and 50801 for HTTPS.
We have just created a second server node for this portal (in the config tool).
When we connect to 50800, does this automatically load balance the user to the better server? From some reading on these forums, it seemed to indicate that load balancing will only occur if I connect using port 8109. (where 09 is the instance number for the SCS of our portal)
When connecting to port 8109, we are redirected to port 50800, as I'd expect.
Question 1 - do we need to use 8109 for load balancing, or can we still use 50800?
Question 2 - If we need to use 8109, which is a HTTP port, how can we achieve load balancing with HTTPS. Is there a different port we need to use to have HTTPS with load balancing?
Question 3 - Is the creation of a second server node the best way to accomodate additional users and load on the portal system, or is there a better way to do things?
Thanks,
Michael.

Better late than never.
The load balancing you describe through the message server has its limitation. It redirects you to one of the dialog server hosts which means that any bookmarks will always point directly to a dialog server which may be down at that moment.
Access directly to a dialog server on port 50800 will sort of load balanc on the java server instances that are on that server but not on other servers.
The general recommendation is to setup an external loadbalancer and SAP Web dispatcher is a good match if the load is not very high. SAP webdispatcher will then bind up the cluster address and act as a proxy towards the dialog servers of the portal. The user will therefore only see one address. This will also work for HTTPS.
Regards
Dagfinn

How to configure R/3 System with Load Balancing?

Hello,
I've created a Web DynPro Application and I would like to case an iView on it. According to SAP tutorials I first need to configure an R/3 System with Load Balancing.
My problem is how to configure the "WAS Host Name".
According to the tutorial:
WAS Host Name = <host>.<domain>:port (this corresponds to the Web Dynpro server location and the port on which it is running eg. PXYZ.wdf.sap.corp:50000.)
I am using NW 04 and my portal is running on this address:
http://ep6sp9test:50000/irj/portal
When I set the WAS Host Name to ep6sp9test:50000 the Test connection fails (I have privildges and created an alias and User mapping). What should I put at this field then?

Hi
I think you have to specify the HTTP port og the WAS running the R/3 system. The 50000 port is the HTTP port of your portal - not the R/3 system. You can see the HTTP port of the R/3 system using transactioncode SMICM - services in the R/3 system.
BR
Tom

Recommended configuration for load balanced Portal with load balancer, multiple gateways and multiple servers.

Does anyone have a recommended network, hardware and software configuration guide for a Portal installation running with multiple gateways load balanced (ie one URL) that talk to multiple servers?

David,
We've used Resonate (software) to load balance the gateways. It allows
you to group all the gateways under 1 virtual URL and load balance the
incoming connections over each gateway depending on the rules that you
define in Resonate. Look in the SUN portal whitepapers there is one that
talks about it specifically.
As far as load balancing the calls to the portals, the gateways will
automatically load balance across all the portals that they know about
using a simple round-robin rotation. You may be able to use Resonate in
front of the portals but you may need to activate persistance within
Resonate to ensure that the user always ends up on the portal that he
established his initial connection on (if you want that), check with Sun
on this one.
David Broeren wrote:
Recommended configuration for load balanced Portal with load balancer,
multiple gateways and multiple servers.
Does anyone have a recommended network, hardware and software
configuration guide for a Portal installation running with multiple
gateways load balanced (ie one URL) that talk to multiple servers?
Try our New Web Based Forum at http://softwareforum.sun.com
Includes Access to our Product Knowledge Base!

BM clustering with load balancing

I want to implement BM clustering with load balancing according to AppNote written by Steve Aitken from March 25, 2005.
It's clear that I need to use two private addresses (from the example, these are 10.10.10.10 and 10.10.10.11). However, I'm not sure what are IP addresses 10.10.10.1 and 10.10.10.2 used for?
Existing BM servers have two NICs: first defined as private and the second as public addresses connected directly to Internet (they are from different subnets).
Sinisa

Originally Posted by phxazcraig
In article <[email protected]>, Tnelson 2000
wrote:
> I've set this up per the appnote and aren't able to get out through any
> of the ip addresses. I get a 504 Gateway Time out error. I also noticed
> that the cluster master ip address is different, 10.10.10.12, for
> example. Do you know what I need to look at to verify I have this
> configured correctly?
>
What do you mean "aren't able to get out through any of the ip
addresses"?
Do the addresses show up in any of the proxy nodes with display secondary
ipaddress? Does the proxy console option 17 show the server listening on
those addresses?
Is the gateway timeout error a BorderManager (or Windows) error? If
BMgr, then check that BMgr has a correct default gateway, DNS is working
(option 4 on proxy console screen) and try dropping filters for a test.
Craig Johnson
Novell Knowledge Partner
*** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
BorderManager, go to Craig Johnson Consulting - BorderManager, NetWare, and More ***
Got it working. I noticed that my dns setting in BM2 didn't coincide with settings in BM1. So, I made them the same and reinitialized the system on both servers. Of course, when I did that, it added the secondary IP addresses. So, I'm really not sure what was stopping it from working before, unless I have something misconfigured that's preventing the secondary addresses from loading. Go figure.

Rv042 dual-wan threshold based load balance?

I have an RV042 (it's old, silver/dark grey plastic front one) w/ firmware 1.3.13.02-tm.
The reason we bought this (long ago) was to balance two WAN connections, one with unlimited data and one capped monthly. It did that once, but for a couple years both connections have been unmetered so it's just been balancing them 50/50. As of today one WAN connection (the new much faster one) is back to being metered but I can't figure out how to configure the RV042 as it once was to prefer sending traffic over the slow, unmetered connection first, and only use the faster metered connection when necessary.
It's been a long time and honestly I only vaguely remember the ability to prioritize a connection based on % of bandwidth used so that all traffic would go over the unlimited connection 1st until it was flooded, and only then fall over to the metered connection. This is totally different than the weighted round robin, or smart link backup.
I found this 3rdparty pforum post that supports that vauge memory and suggests this was eliminated netweem firmware 1.23 and 1.3:
http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?threads/rv042-load-balancing-options-from-the-manual-where-to-find.15512/#post-69948
So I humlbly ask... Is it possible to replicate this functionality with the current firmware? if so how? If not, how to do roll back to firmware 1.23?
It sounded like perhaps I could assigned WAN1 a bandwidth of 100000 (even though it's really 1500) and then assign WAN2 a bandwidth of 1 (even though it's really 20000) and the result might be the prioritization I'm looking to achieve... but I feel like I'm stumbling in the dark at the point.
Just FYI, I'm not at all opposed to buying new hardware to acheive this if it's not terribly expensive (ie. <$200). I'd rather not, but I've got to solve this quick.

Hi Jon,
I Also have one of these routers.
On the bottom mine says (v02) which means its hardware version is 2.
I just got this one brand new for home as I have been using them for a very long time now. However I have been using them for VPN and now I am needing the same functionality as you.
I am currently running Firmware Version: 1.3.12.19-tm
If you login to the web management (eg 192.168.1.1) and go to System Management > Dual-WAN
Down the bottom you will see "Protocol Binding".
This is all I know of to send specific ports or applications via a specific WAN.
I'll give you an example of how I am using it currently.. (BTW it seems to be working OK, But you are on a higher firmware)
eg: WAN1 is more reliable than WAN2 which is a cheap unlimited service.
So I bind port 5060 (sip), port 80 (http) and port 443 (https) to WAN1 so that my VOIP phone is on the good service and so is all web traffic.
so all the other stuff can use the unlimited connection.
Also, My current bandwidth settings are
WAN          UPSTREAM          DOWNSTREAM
1                384                       8000
2                384                       10000
And Under: System Management > Bandwidth Management you can also prioritize those ports.
This may help you in some way, So maybe you can help me..
Your post has made me not want to upgrade the firmware.. Can you please confirm that this functionality exists still?
Thanks

RV042 dual VPN connections between locations with load balance

We currently have three remote offices connected to the main office with gateway to gateway VPN's over DSL lines and everything is working fine. All offices have an RV042 with current firmware. We have added a second DSL line at every location and want to add a second VPN tunnel on WAN2 from the remote offices to the main office and load balance those. Load balance to the internet with the new lines works OK but the issue is that I can't create a second tunnel on WAN2 with the same network addresses as the existing tunnel on WAN1. It seems like this would be a pretty common thing with a dual WAN router but I'm not having much luck figuring it out. Does anybody know of a way to do what we're trying to do?

Hi,
WHile all the RV series Routers provide Dual WAN capability:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9923/products_qanda_item09186a0080a33b64.shtml
Only thr RV082 allows the backup tunnel. The implementation on the RV082 is not to create a new, separate tunnel using the backup WAN. Instead, the VPN GUI exposes an Advanced tab for the primary tunnel, and you complete the fields in the GUI using the backup WAN IP addresses. I am pretty sure this is not offered on the RV042. It wasnt last I check, but check your GUI for the above. If its not there, then you cant do it.
Steve DiStefano
Systems Engineer
US Field Channel Sales

Need help with load balancing and DNS proxy

Hi,
I need help on how to configure my router so it will work with my DNS proxy and load balancing.
I have a Linksys LRT224 router. I have two broadband connections from two separate ISPs,500Mbps each (WAN1 & WAN2). WAN1 has a static IP and WAN2 is dynamic assigned. I use Unlocator (www.unlocator.com) so I can access geographically restricted sites (Pandora, Netflix, etc.).
The problem I have is that unlocator registers only one IP address (WAN1 address) and since I am doing load balancing I have no way of knowing if the DNS request will go through the registered IP (WAN1) or through the other (WAN2). I am not an expert in routing or networking but I'm guessing I have a way of configuring the router so all the DNS requests go out through WAN1, right?
In the router's Dual WAN config page there is a section for Protocol Binding. I tried to configure but only managed to screw up the internet at home. I used:
DNS[UDP/53-53]->192.168.1.1-192.168.1.254(0.0.0.0-0.0.0.0)WAN2
Any help or suggestions are appreciated.
Alex

Good solution though. That's probably the only way you could do true Load Balancing anyway.
Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
Linksys
Communities Technical Support

Need help with load balancing and DNS proxy -Repost

Hi,
I need help on how to configure my router so it will work with my DNS proxy and load balancing.
I have a Linksys LRT224 router. I have two broadband connections from two separate ISPs,500Mbps each (WAN1 & WAN2). WAN1 has a static IP and WAN2 is dynamic assigned. I use Unlocator (www.unlocator.com) so I can access geographically restricted sites (Pandora, Netflix, etc.).
The problem I have is that unlocator registers only one IP address (WAN1 address) and since I am doing load balancing I have no way of knowing if the DNS request will go through the registered IP (WAN1) or through the other (WAN2). I am not an expert in routing or networking but I'm guessing I have a way of configuring the router so all the DNS requests go out through WAN1, right?
In the router's Dual WAN config page there is a section for Protocol Binding. I tried to configure but only managed to screw up the internet at home. I used:
DNS[UDP/53-53]->192.168.1.1-192.168.1.254(0.0.0.0-0.0.0.0)WAN2
Any help or suggestions are appreciated.
Alex

Good solution though. That's probably the only way you could do true Load Balancing anyway.
Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
Linksys
Communities Technical Support

Linksys RV042 Dual Wan with Load Balancing Help?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for