Linksys WRVS4400N Firmware Bug!

i have problem whit my Firmware. I can not open all order of FTPs and i can`t Upload on a FTP and this of all Computers. Test: Cute FTP FileZilla Client SmartFTP Whats this for a bug? Its WDS coiming soon on WRVS4400N?

since it seams like you are having an issue with your firmware , you can perform a factory reset by holding in the button in on back of the router for 30 seconds, wait about 2 minutes and try to upgrade to the latest firmware.
Below is a link to help you with the firmware upgrade.
http://linksys.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/linksys.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=4030&p_created=11601...
Good Luck,
Ttech

Similar Messages

  • Linksys E2000 firmware bug for v1.0.02 build 4Jul. 9, 2010

    I run a website where I help people setup port forwarding in their router.
    So I do know how everything works.
    I own the e2000 and port forwarding has always worked. I updated the firmware and port forwarding works on the single port forwarding page and on dmz. but the port range forwarding page is no longer working. no rule added to that page will work. but the same rules will work on the single port page.
    I want to report this bug in hopes it will get fixed.
    Till then does anyone have a download link to an older firmware?
    Thanks
    Shane

    Glad that it worked!
    Please click "Accept as Solution" on the post that helped you solve the problem and Give Kudos.
    Cheers!
    OnnagokorO

  • Linksys WRVS4400N V1.1.13 slows down Internet speed by 50%

    Hi,
    Recently I upgraded my Internet speed at the ISP from 10Mbps to 25Mbps and the problem is that I am measuring only 15Mbps using speedtest.net.
    On the day when the tech came out to install the new DSL modem, he noticed the difference and as part of troubleshooting, he bypassed the Linksys router and voila the net speed measured 25Mbps using speedtest.net.
    So, why my Linksys WRVS4400N V1.1.13 acts like a bottleneck in this case? I didn't have this problem at the speed of 10Mbps. The upload speed is OK, it is 5Mbs with or without the DSL modem.
    Does someone have any idea how to troubleshoot this problem?

    Hi Tom,
    Thanks for the tipp on disabling the IPS, I did it and the speedtest.net test resulted in 21Mbps.
    So, it is already a great improvement.
    It is interesting though, that on the IPS page of the router, all four protocols were disabled (http, ftp, telnet and rpc), so I am not sure if it was doing anything useful anyway. Am I right?
    Since the tech from my ISP was using speedtest.net for testing and did get 25Mbps, I figured that it should work for me too. I am not sure if our ISP has a website for the same purpose.
    In order to eliminate any bugs I was considering upgrading the firmware on my router, but I am not sure which firmware I should use, it seems to me that there are two sets of firmwares available for my router one with VPN version 1.xx the other one is VPN ver. 2.xxx
    The model# of my router is WRVS4400N v1.1  but I am not sure whether to upgrade to one or the other VPN version is up to me or the VPN version range is already set in my router and I cannot upgrade to 2 from 1 in case I have VPN v1. (How can I tell which version of VPN I have on my router?)
    8 hours later I added this text:
    I did another test on speedtest.net and at this time I got 24.35Mbps, so you were right, speedtest.net won't give you a reliable speed value if you just run it once and you want to make a decision based on that. (Btw., I contacted our ISP, they don't have a net speed measuring website within their own network.)
    So, I am done with the speed problem thanks to your right on target suggestion, but could you please, answer my other two questions:
    - Was the IPS in my router doing anything usefull to me since all 4 protocolls were disabled - until now?
    - About the firmware dilemma.
    Thanks.

  • Linksys WRVS4400N / Netgear SC101T problem ...

    Hi!
    I recently upgraded from my old WRT54G to the new WRVS4400N. A few weeks before I upgraded I also bought a new NAS (Netgear SC101T, 1 GBit EN, 2 x 500 GB HDDs, mirrored, redundant, different manufacturers) but I found the fast EN (100 MBit) on the WRT54G to be the bottleneck of this setup as my notebook also supports 1 GBit EN.
    So, to finally benefit from the GBit-EN I upgraded to the WRVS4400N (firmware version V1.00.12-ETSI). However, I do not get the SC101T to run with the new router?!? Installing the SC101T under Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP2 (up to date) with the original software as provided by Netgear was no problem. The NAS connected without any problems and I have been using the NAS quite often since for backups.
    However, after upgrading to the WRVS4400N the SC101T is no longer accessible. The status LEDs for power, disks and ethernet signal that everything runs fine. Openening the DHCP Client table on the WRVS4400N shows that the NAS is recognised as:
    'Client Host Name: MicroSAN Base[0]
    IP: 48.48.48.45 or 48.48.48.48
    MAC: 30:30:30:30:30:30'
    or
    'Client Host Name: Root[1]:52315352
    IP: 48.48.48.48
    MAC: 02:18:4D:74:43:89'
    or
    'Client Host Name: 11A4F5D6-0AF4-11
    IP: 52.49.70.52
    MAC: 02:18:4D:73:874'
    (plus seconds that indicate how long this IP address will be valid, a mere 60 sec ...)
    I have my WRVS4400N acting as a DHCP server, address is 192.168.2.1, identical to the address I used on the WRT54G. I have about 28 IP addresses left to be assigned by the DHCP server.
    Clicking on 'L2 Switch' -> 'Port Settings' shows the NAS to be connected at 1000Mbps Full Duplex, Auto negotiation, flow control activated, max frame 1518.
    I am using Agnitum Outpost Firewall, v4.0.1007.7323 (591) but it does not matter whether it is active, inactive or fully deactivated.
    Any hints? There are a lot of pictures (=all) of our newborn daughter stored on the NAS, so I do want to be able to access the NAS again ...
    Thanks!
    Cheers Lars
    Nachricht wurde am 08-01-2007 12:51 PM von Lars_Behnke bearbeitet.

    hi!
    Have you tried assigning static IP on your NAS?  Is that the only thing that did not work on the router? Is firmware V1.00.12-ETSI came with the router? (out of the box)
     I checked the Linksys website and found out that the latest firmware for WRVS4400N was 1.00.15. If putting a fixed IP on your NAS did not work, maybe you can reset the router and reconfigure or try the latest firmware. I hope it helps.

  • Any ideas why the Linksys WRVS4400N ain't on the Product Registeration anymore?

     Hey guys!
     When I wanna register my router,I can't find it! It's not on the list! Any ideas? And I can't find the WRVS4400N firmware page,is there anyone who can post it for me?!
     Thanks!
    (Mod note: Edited post for guideline compliance. Thanks!)
    Message Edited by JOHNDOE_06 on 07-12-2009 06:33 AM
    Yours Faithfully, iR0cKtHeBl0cK,
    ................!Hacking Boss!................

    Cisco has completed the "takeover" of Linksys and all "business grade" products have been transferred over to Cisco's web site.

  • WRVS4400N Firmware 1.1.03 problem

    I recently updated my WRVS4400N firmware to 1.01.03.  I use WPA-Personal with AES encryption security for my wireless laptops.  I disabled Wireless SSID Broadcast and only allow my laptop MAC address to access my router.  After I upgraded to 1.1.03 which is the latest firmware from Linksys.com.  My wireless laptops drop session all the time.  I rebuilt the client wireless profile did not help.  Does anyone have the similar problem?
    Brian

    Yes,  I reset several times and also reset it by holding the reset button at the back of the device several seconds without helping. 

  • Firmware bug: $CCERT must not be used in Report_Rule

    Prolog
    "Report Rule" can be configured with URL's used to save phone's current configuration. Starting with 7.5.2b firmware it is possible to configure more than one URL here. The semi-colon has been used as separator. It caused issues because semi-colon can be used in casual URL, so the separator has been changed to space in 7.5.5 (see Bug in Report_Rule parsing (SPA50x, fw 7.5.x) for more)
    As of 7.5.7 firmware, the 2048 certificates has been introduced and value of $CCERT variable may contain text "Installed (2048 bits)". It cause other issue related to Report Rule parsing.
    Issue & how to repeat
    $CCERT can be used on "Report Rule" no longer because of wrong parsing order.
    The author of firmware first call variable expansion for complete "Report Rule" string, then split the result by space in attempt to found second URL.
    With Report Rule configured to https://test.local/Report.php?Product=$PN&CERT=$CCERT it is parsed to:
    first_rule is https://test.local/Cisco/Report.php?Product=SPA508G&CERT=Installed, second_rule is (2048 bits)
    It is wrong result. In advance, it reveal the characters inserted into URL by variable expansion are not escaped properly.
    How to fix
    The order of parsing steps needs to be reversed. Report Rule need to be split  into parts first, then variable expansion should be called for both parts independently. Also, strings expanded from variables should be url-encoded properly.
    Disclaimer
    I will not call SMB support to report this bug to them. Assuming the Cisco is interested to repair firmware bugs a staff member monitoring this forum will create ticked by self. I wish that all relevant information including the depth-in analysis has been disclosed here. I'm ready to provide further details or create test environment if necessary. I'm just not willing to call the Support center as I'm not willing to explain all those complex things described here by phone (and they doesn't accept written reports).
    For those non-Cisco-staff users affected by issue - feel free to report the issue to Support center, if you are willing to do it. You are allowed to use information disclosed here, or just refer to this report. I don't care the authorship.

    Post Author: CompositeID
    CA Forum: .NET
    You are not alone on this one, I am having the very same issue as you are and . Everything functioned just fine the last time the application was deployed was deployed and there was nothing changed to any of the reports or code which handles the reports; however, this time I am having the same issue.  I added the parameters to the report to check to see if they were actually being recognized by the report and they do show up, but it refuses to filter the records and brings back every record.  The report works properly if I run it just directly in Crystal though.  I sure hope someone can enlighten us Paul.
    Update: Well, I finally figured out what was causing my issue.  The issue had to deal with the actual older version of the CrystalReportViewer control and the newer version supplied by the update.  I had suspected it was something minor that I had overlooked when doing the update.  Hope this gets you going as well.  Cheers

  • Help Please :) LInksys WRVS4400N 802.1X port authentication setup

    HI all,
    I am trying to configure 802.1X port authentication on my Linksys WRVS4400N. I created a test lab in order to do this, currently I am using
    1x Linksys WRVS4400N
    1x Microsoft Server 2003 with IAS and Active Directory services
    1x Dell Laptop (Used for testing Radius Athentication)
    I Created 4 VLAN(s) to test with this LAB
    VLAN 1 Managament. Addr Range 192.168.1.0 /24. GW 192.168.1.254
    VLAN 10 Servers. Addr Range 172.16.1.0 /24. GW 172.16.1.254
    VLAN 20 IT. Addr Range 172.16.2.0 /24. GW 172.16.2.254
    VLAN 30 Design. Addr Range 172.16.3.0 /24. GW 172.16.3.254
    This is how I assigned my VLAN(s) to my ports. This is found on the VLAN & Port Assignment Screen
    Port 1 -> Mode: General -> Frame Type: All -> PVID 1 (Port 1 is used for VLAN 1: Management)
    Port 2 -> Mode: General -> Frame Type: All -> PVID 10 (Port 2 is used for VLAN 20: Servers)
    Port 3 -> Mode: Access -> Frame Type: All (Port 3 is used for RADIUS. DHCP enabled)
    Port 4 -> Mode: Access -> Frame Type: All (Port 4 is used for RADIUS. DHCP enabled)
    VLAN 1: Default
    Port 1: Untagged, Port 2: Tagged, Port(s): 3, 4 & Wireless: Excluded
    VLAN 10: Servers
    Port(s): 1, 3, 4 & Wireless: Excluded. Port 2: Untagged
    VLAN 20: IT
    Port(s): 1, 2: Excluded, Port(s): 3,4 & Wireless: Untagged
    VLAN 30: Design
    Port(s): 1, 2: Excluded, Port(s): 3,4 & Wireless: Untagged
    This is how my Radius is setup
    Mode: Enabled
    RADIUS IP: 172.16.1.1 (IP of the WIN2K3 Server)
    UDP Port: 1812
    Secret: Password1
    Port(s) 1 & 2: Force Authorized
    Port(s) 3 & 4: Force UnAuthorized
    On the Server this is what I have configured
    1. Created a domain: GLAB. Created two groups: IT LAN, Design LAN, then assigned users to those groups. IE: User1 belongs to IT LAN
    2. Created a IAS Remote Access Policy and named it IT LAN. The profile settings are listed below
    Tunnel-Medium-Type: 802
    Tunnel-PVT-Group-ID: 20
    Tunnel-Type: Virtual LAN
    My goal is to test RADIUS authentication on ports 3 and 4 on the Linksys WRV . I tested everything else I made sure the VLAN's were working ok so what I did was took a Dell Laptop and joined it to my domain. I pluged the Dell Laptop into port 4 to test Radius Authentication. When I tried to log in as User1 it didn't work.
    I am new to setting up 802.1X, I wanted to know if I missed a setting or I misconfigured something. I even ran wireshark on my Windows 2003 machine to see if any RADIUS data is coming from my router (172.16.1.254) and I didn't see anything
    If anybody can help me out that would be great!
    Cheers
    Graham

    1. I don't think the WRVS4400N supports RADIUS assigned VLANs. I can't find anything in the manual suggesting it would. I would say you can only use the RADIUS server for authentication on a port but the VLAN must be configured before.
    2. You don't write what is exactly connected to each port on the WRVS. For instance, it is unclear whether the MS Server is connected directly to port 2 or whether it connects to another switch to which you have connected other servers as well.
    3. The VLAN configuration looks very odd to me. If I see it correctly you have:
    Port 1: General mode, PVID 1, 1U
    Port 2: General mode, PVID 10, 1T, 10U
    Port 3: Access mode, PVID ???, 20U, 30U
    Port 4: Access mode, PVID ???, 20U, 30U
    I wonder why you are even able to set this up...
    a. Port 1 should be set to Access mode with PVID 1 and 1U. With access mode the port is member of a single VLAN and all traffic is untagged. That is exactly what you have set up, but with General mode.
    b. Port 2 must be connected to a server (or a managed switch). The NIC in the server must be configured for 802.1q tagged frames. On the server NIC you must configure VLAN 1 as tagged VLAN and VLAN 10 as default/native/untagged VLAN. Only then the server is able to communicate on VLAN 1 and VLAN 10.
    c. Port 3&4 are in access mode. In access mode the port can only be member of a single VLAN. What you post suggests that they are member of two VLANs. That should not even be possible to configure. If it is possible, that it is definitively incorrect. You must decide to which VLAN these ports belong to.
    4. To use RADIUS authentication on a port you must set it to "Auto". "Force UnAuthorized" sets it unauthorized, i.a.W. you disable the port completely. To traffic will go through. See the manual: "Force Unauthorized—Controlled port state is set to Force-Unauthorized (discard traffic). All connections are blocked."
    5. Did you verify that your RADIUS server is actually using port 1812? 1645 is also commonly used for radius authentication. Check the configuration on the RADIUS server or check with "netstat -a" to see if 1812 is used.
    6. Also check, whether the RADIUS traffic is sent on the management VLAN 1. The WRVS uses VLAN 1 as management VLAN and it might well be that it expects the RADIUS server to be in the management VLAN. Use the server IP address in VLAN 1 as RADIUS server IP address to check that.
    7. Did you check with wireshark the traffic on the 802.1x client machine? Does it send something out? Does it receive anything?

  • Is there ANY way to report firmware bugs to nokia ...

    Nokia released firmware 51.018 for E52 6 months ago.This broke N-Gage and games which were paid for can not be activted.The problem is not corrected in later updates.
    Firmware v52,v53,v54.Nokia Care centers tell me its Network problem.I have tested 5 E52s and it is a firmware problem.Mailing to ASK nokia does not reult in bug getting known to programmers either.They lecture me about correct settings.
    Some body please tell me if  there ANY way to report firmware bugs to nokia programmers
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    do you think there will be a new firmware update for e52?
    E52 - Product code 0585050
    UK.
    V54.003

  • E55 Thread for Firmware Bugs

    I noticed that there isn't yet a thread in order to report E55 firmware bugs, so I started this
    Here the firmware bugs I've found:
    - Hidden WLAN: when you search for wireless access points (for example from the main screen) the phone see always one "hidden wlan", that is not there!
    - Default phone numbers: when you have more phone numbers for a contact, you can choose one of these as default for messaging or dialing, but even if you do that, E55 keep asking you what number to use every time you make a sms
    - Organizer major bug: sometimes (80% of times!) when you edit a memo in Organizer, or when you move it (by changing the start date), you will see that also the end date has changed (adding 1 or more days), even if you didn't touch it! And even if the start and the end date originally matched! So if you had a memo covering one day, now it covers more days, and the end date can't be changed again (you set the correct date, save, and none happens). This make the memos totally unusable!
    - Organizer minor bug: when you open Organizer, and then open a memo, you have to select the information that you want to modify (text, date, synch) and click one more time to edit the memo. But: if you select the "date" or the "synch" row, instead of the "text" row, and then click "modify", the memo is open alway with the cursor on the "text" row. So, the capability of selecting others rows, is pretty useless.
    I hope some Nokia guy will notice this thread so there informations can be useful for a future firmware release, also because I'm getting crazy with the memos issue!!
    Roberto
    Moderator note: word 'official' removed from title, as this may mislead users to believe that the information presented comes from or is in some way endorsed by Nokia.
    Message Edited by michaels on 05-Oct-2009 10:06 AM
    Message Edited by michaels on 05-Oct-2009 03:31 PM
    Roberto Dapino
    http://www.stormvision.it/blog

    hi olandesevolante
    about ur first and second issues u face they r not realy bugs, why?
    for the first one:  i faced that with my E51 in a place i visited before, that hidden WLAN maybe a conflict from another type of waves other than that of wlan using same frequency
    and about the second issue:  default phone numbers is a feature that only set for making calls but when u make an sms the phone will ask u to choose between numbers present unders the same contact name even if u set a default number, so it is not a bug but that is the normal firmware properties
    for the rest of issues , they sound like real bugs
    i hope i helped a little and i wish those bugs will be removed in the next firmware
    Message Edited by michaels on 05-Oct-2009 03:31 PM
    Phones I bought from 1st till now:
    3210 / 3310 / 3410 / 6310 / 6600 / 6020 / N72 / E51 / X2-00 / 5310 xpress Music / E90 Communicator
    If you like my post or it helped you, Give me Kodo

  • Firmware bug: CPU1 tried to use APIC500

    Every time I want to use the computer (HP Compaq  6005 Pro small form factor) I have to switch it on and then push the reset button after booting up to a black screen.
    I once got :
    Firmware bug: CPU1 tried to use APIC500 (LVT offset0) for vector 0x400 but the register is already in use for vector 0xf9 on another CPU.
    Any ideas?
    Is Linux reporting a real firmware fault or is it wrong?

    Hello anonio-mouse,
    Welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience! To help you get the most out of the HP Forums I would like to direct your attention to the HP Forums Guide First Time Here? Learn How to Post and More.
    I understand you are getting the [Firmware Bug]: cpu 1, try to use APIC500 (LVT offset 0) for vector 0x400, but the register is already in use for vector 0xf9 on another cpu. I have looked on the Ubuntu site and under the Bugs section I found the bug [Firmware Bug]: cpu 1, try to use APIC500 (LVT offset 0) for vector 0x400, but the register is alrea... so it looks to be a geniune error and is being addressed on the Ubuntu site.
    I hope I have answered your question to your satisfaction. Thank you for posting on the HP Forums. Enjoy your weekend!
    Please click the "Thumbs Up" on the bottom right of this post to say thank you if you appreciate the support I provide!
    Also be sure to mark my post as “Accept as Solution" if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others who face the same challenge find the same solution.
    Dunidar
    I work on behalf of HP
    Find out a bit more about me by checking out my profile!
    "Customers don’t expect you to be perfect. They do expect you to fix things when they go wrong." ~ Donald Porter

  • Firmware bug? No Connect/Disconnect button on "Manual" PPPoE option

    Hi,
    To the best of my knowledge this is a firmware bug.
    There is no Connect/Disconnect option when choosing "Manual" from the PPPoE settings.
    There are two related (unanswered) posts:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=8166971&#8166971
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=8137893&#8137893
    Is there an official way to report such a bug?
    Does anybody have another solution?
    Thanks,
    Omri

    I reported the bug and got this response:
    This is a follow up to Bug ID# 6286922. After further investigation it has been determined that this is a known issue, which is currently being investigated by engineering. This issue has been filed in our bug database under the original Bug ID# 5847755. The original bug number being used to track this duplicate issue can be found in the State column, in this format: Duplicate/OrigBug#.

  • Firmware bugs

    Hello!
    I found three firmware bugs and already informed the hotline about one of them in january. It is not fixed in firmware 1.1, so I am posting here.
    The first, already reported, bug can be seen with German language setting when configuring the alarm clock. The dialog where you can enter the desired alarm time shows am/pm time although the other time options change to 24h display when setting the iPod to German.
    The second bug is inside the game Solitair. Very often you can't move a card to the "finished" stack, although it matches perfectly. For example you can move a red four on top of a black five, but not on top of the (matching) red three at the top.
    The third bug is inside the game Brick. I noticed sometimes the ball does not get faster over time which makes it very easy to go through all levels. In fact after some time the first level re-appears.
    The following facts are annoying, but I don't know if I can call them bugs.
    a) My computer very often loses the connection to the iPod while transferring (large) files. I am using opensource software (Linux, gtkpod), so it might be something to preven t users from using non-supported hardware.
    The first message indicating the problem is
    "Nov 26 13:38:13 carsten-otto usb 1-3: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 71" just after the transfer stopped. This message repeats some times and then everything gets messy.
    b) Videos stop playing with sound after some time. I did not try with official videos yet, but my self built videos do meet the requirements and should play. After about ten seconds the video stops for about 5 seconds and then starts again, but from now on without sound. Whenever I seek to a new position I can have sound again, but only for another ten seconds.
    Please tell me how to solve the problems and/or how to contact Apple so that they can help me.
    Thank you,
    Carsten Otto

    The Video issue I am having, and I believe all people are having with 5th Generation Video IPODS. I've installed probably 8 or 9 programs over the last two days, hoping to find one that doesn't screw up the video/sound after a few minutes.
    It's interesting because none of the Video Podcasts seem to have a problem running on it, but some information regarding how this is working for Video Podcasts but nothing else is missing. I would hope a firmware upgrade is in the works to fix this problem, because if not I anticipate a large recall, and I think this would be bad publicity for Apple, at a time when many competitors are biting at the bit to take a share out of the market.

  • Nokia 5320 XM firmware bugs concerning date and al...

    Hello!
    Although already having twice sent in my Nokia 5320 XpressMusic for repair, I'm still suffering from severe firmware bugs concerning date and alarm of the device. Here some information on when and how the bugs are showing themselves:
    Settings: A different weekly alarm is programmed for each day of the week. The phone is being switched off for the night.
    The programmed alarm is being run correctly by the phone. The phone is being switched on after having disabled the alarm.
    Some time later the date changes to four or five days in the future. Moreover the phone starts to ring for the day the date has changed to. Often it's not ringing at the time that has been programmed for that day, even though pretending to do so.
    Example:
    9:45 on Sunday: phone is correctly ringing at the programmed time. 
    10:15 on Sunday: phone is incorrectly ringing again pretending it was Friday 7:50
    the clock remains unchanged, however the date has changed automatically for five days
    Linked to this error, there seem to exist similar problems with date and snooze-function already mentioned on these forums:
    /discussions/board/message?board.id=smartphones&message.id=145323
    /discussions/board/message?board.id=smartphones&message.id=144139
    /discussions/board/message?board.id=smartphones&message.id=143893
    As I mentioned above, I already sent my phone in twice, however I always got it back with the mention: repaired on guarantee. To me, this seems rather disgraceful for Nokia. I sincerely hope, that, if necessary with the pressure of other users being concerned as well, we arrive to get a phone that is really working as one could await it from the leader in mobile phone production!
    I hope we will be informed soon about when there will be a firmware update!
    Thanks for your replies!
    Regards,
    Lorenz

    Have the same problem, as I already mentioned in my posts too. But unfortunatly no reply from Nokia either. Seems they really don't care about it. It would be at least apropriate, that they at least announce time of new firmware and note if they will fix this problem with it.
    But no replay from them   I contacted local nokia dealer in Slovenia, but they just say they can not help. And that we must wait for new firmware.
    Now I wonder, when it should came out ?! I am sick of this trouble with my phone. and as you said, I am also turning off my phone since I want my battery to last longer. so this bug must be fixed.
    Nokia team, anyone?!?!?  

  • 6220c firmware bug?

    Updated firmware to 5.15 in my 6220 classic yesterday. After some memory card trouble, it now seems to work, with one exception that I have noted. If I do *#0000# and then options/check for updates and select my usual ISP, I get a message saying "system error". Other ways of accessing Internet work fine with this ISP. Could this be a firmware bug?

    i have same problem with my 6220c firmware 5.15,and i have reflashed the firmware twice still same problem,i am unable to watch mobile tv on my tv screen via tv out cable,the voice works fine on tv but there is no picture except a key with a slash in blue background on my tv,and its almost a year now since nokia released a new firmware for 6220c generic and other phones like 5800,5530,n79,n97,n96 etc has goten 2 or 3 firmwares each 2009/2010

Maybe you are looking for