Linux 3.11 breaks triple monitor support on intel graphics

I just ran pacman -Syu, observed linux (3.10.10-1 -> 3.11.1-1), and found that I can no longer use more than 2 monitors simultaneously. When I try to configure 3 or 4 monitors with xrandr or arandr, I get an error message like "xrandr: configure crtc 2 failed".
When I boot with linux-lts 3.10.12, it works reliably again.
I have Intel HD Graphics 4000 on a i5-3320M CPU for a Thinkpad T530 with a ThinkPad Mini Dock Series 3.
I have 4 monitors: internal laptop screen, DVI, DisplayPort, and a USB DisplayLink. With linux 3.10, all 4 can work simultaneously. With linux 3.11, any 2 of them can work simultaneously.
In my journalctl at boot time, I see
kernel: fbcon: inteldrmfb (fb1) is primary device
kernel: fbcon: Remapping primary device, fb1, to tty 1-63
kernel: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 45 for MSI/MSI-X
kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): ethernet0: link is not ready
kernel: iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S
kernel: iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: Radio type=0x2-0x0-0x0
kernel: psmouse serio1: synaptics: Touchpad model: 1, fw: 7.2, id: 0x1c0b1, caps: 0xd047b3/0xb40000/0xa0000, board id: 71, fw id: 920262
kernel: psmouse serio1: synaptics: serio: Synaptics pass-through port at isa0060/serio1/input0
kernel: input: SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad as /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/input/input18
kernel: iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S
kernel: iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: Radio type=0x2-0x0-0x0
kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wifi0: link is not ready
kernel: con2fb_init_display: detected unhandled fb_set_par error, error code -22
kernel: [drm] Enabling RC6 states: RC6 on, RC6p on, RC6pp on
kernel: wifi0: authenticate with .........
kernel: .ready
kernel: sd 7:0:0:0: [sdd] .........
kernel: released /dev/fb0 user=0 count=0
kernel: con2fb_release_oldinfo: detected unhandled fb_set_par error, error code -22
kernel: i915 0000:00:02.0: fb1: inteldrmfb frame buffer device
Yesterday when I was running linux 3.10, I saw this in my journalctl at boot time with no errors:
kernel: fbcon: inteldrmfb (fb1) is primary device
kernel: fbcon: Remapping primary device, fb1, to tty 1-63
kernel: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 45 for MSI/MSI-X
kernel: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 45 for MSI/MSI-X
kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): ethernet0: link is not ready
kernel: iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S
kernel: iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: Radio type=0x2-0x0-0x0
kernel: psmouse serio1: synaptics: Touchpad model: 1, fw: 7.2, id: 0x1c0b1, caps: 0xd047b3/0xb40000/0xa0000, board id: 71, fw id: 920262
kernel: psmouse serio1: synaptics: serio: Synaptics pass-through port at isa0060/serio1/input0
kernel: input: SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad as /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/input/input18
kernel: iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: L1 Enabled; Disabling L0S
kernel: iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: Radio type=0x2-0x0-0x0
kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wifi0: link is not ready
kernel: wifi0: authenticate with .............
kernel: released /dev/fb0 user=0 count=0
kernel: i915 0000:00:02.0: fb1: inteldrmfb frame buffer device
My symptoms seem similar to Unable to configure 3 display multihead / X fails to start with 3 displays connected, although that was reported on linux 3.4.

Googling around, I found a few more people with what looks like the same problem commenting at the bottom of wrpll sharing not implemented (3x HDMI/DVI screens).
I have Intel graphics card and it supports triple head setup very well. ... I updated kernel to 3.11.1 after it appeared in Archlinux's repo and one of screens stopped working. I tried to fix it with xrandr but I got only "xrandr: Configure crtc failed" errors and these in Xorg.0.log:
I have a similar setup and am experiencing the same thing. Downgrading to 3.10 fixed the issue. I'm also happy to help fix this.
But apparently it's not the correct bug since someone said "if triple display worked and regressed in recent kernels then you have a different bug."
I think I should report this somewhere, but I'm not sure I understand exactly where (linux or xorg or arch?)

Similar Messages

  • T410 Dual monitor support with integrated graphics

    I am considering purchasing a T410 with integrated graphics, but I need to make sure it will support dual digital displays (with a dock of course).  I use a T500 for work, and when I switch to the integrated chip, I am unable to use dual monitors.
    Can someone confirm that the T410 (integrated graphics) can use dual digital displays with a dock?

    Should work. That NEC is 1920x1080 which is suported on the single-link DVI. DP can handle even more. The dock has both DVI and DP. Your ThinkPad supports the 2 monitor outs. My understanding is the ThinkPad LCD would need to be off when you do this; the specs on the dock mention max 2 monitors simultaneously.

  • Triple monitor: Sapphire HD5670 512MB (*non* eyefinity version)

    Those reading will know that, in order to have up to 3 displays showing content in a single graphics card, if it's an AMD card then you need a certain feature known as EyeFinity.
    In particular, I am talking about tihs card:
    http://www.google.co.uk/products/catalo … CDAQ8wIwAQ
    You will notice in the picture that this one has  DP, but there is another version that has VGA port in its place. I courd not for the life of me find it again, but at the time of buying the concern was CRT usage, so a VGA port was important. I did not know about EyeFinity at the time.
    This guide is for people whe made mistakes like this.
    This is typically the case. With my card in particular, you cannot get triple monitor in Windows, because the drivers prevent it (it is possible in Linux).
    I said prevent.
    If a card has 3 video outputs, each with their own RAMDAC (or none, if its digital-only), then why can you not use all 3 at the same time?
    Typically in such a setup, if it does not have EyeFinity, then the connectors are usually:
    VGA, DVI, HDMI (my card)
    or
    DVI, DVI, VGA (other cards)
    or
    DVI DVI, HDMI
    or
    HDMI, HDMI, DVI
    In other words, all ef these types of card without support for EyeFinity, do not have:
    DisplayPort connector
    This is a rather crude way of getting it to work, but any solution is a selution still.
    Well, here is a simple way I get triple monitor on my card that does not support EyeFinity:
    VGA lcd in the VGA
    DVI lcd in the DVI
    DVI lcd in the HDMI (using HDMI-DVI adapter)
    The HDMI is disconnected via a coupler, before I boot into Linux. I have a script with these commands:
    xrandr --auto --output VGA-0 --mode 1280x1024
    xrandr --auto --output DVI-0 --mode 1280x1024 --right-of VGA-0
    xrandr --auto --output HDMI-0 --mode 1280x1024 --right-of DVI-0
    (run it as a bash script)
    With the HDMI (via HDMI-DVI, then a DVI coupler, then DVI to DVI going to the monitor) disconnected at the coupler, I run this script.
    Of course, this script sets triple monitor, but right now only the DVI and VGA are hooked up.
    Once it has done, I have dual monitor.
    Then, connect at the coupler (or "gender changer") on the HDMI output. Now all 3 displays are connected, but you still have dual monitor.
    Run the above commands again, and you will see triple monitor.
    Now that you have solved the problem of getting tri-monitor in X, if you look at your TTYs you will notice that only one of the screens is showing. In X (usually terminal 7 or 8), simply disconnect the HDMI at the coupler for a few seconds, then reconnect it.
    Now you to your TTY (Ctrl-Alt-F{1-6}), and it will show text on all 3 screens (albeit duplicated).
    Thoughts,
    I am not sure as to why this is possible to do. I see it as "tricking" the other incapable hardware into outputting on 3 displays, but it seems penfectly functional.
    My guess is that this actually is an EyeFinity card, in the sense that it is the same base an which other cards (with DP, and thus, EyeFinity) are built, but that this particular card can be used in the same way, to get triple monitor.
    Either that, or this is a "bug" in X11/XrandR (if it is a bug, please do not fix it, I like my triple monitors, I call it a feature).
    I know that this certainly works in Xubuntu too, I tried it on a Live CD.
    I tried removing the graphics card and trying this on the intergrated graphics (HD 4290/4250 I think), which also has the same 3 outputs, but the hardwas itself actually enforces a maximum of 2 monitors. If you have DVI and HDMI hooked up, it defaults to HDMI, but masquerades as DVI (where the drivers are concerned). You could use this hack, but then it would still not work because the hardware itself, not the driver softawre, is enforcing it.
    The board is: ASUS M4a89GTD PRO
    Last edited by NightCrawler03X (2012-01-17 17:45:59)

    Hello,
    i get the same messages without any problems for my intel card.
    You can read more about it in this thread:
    http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-85 … ec66f93bf2
    There are a fair amount of people who have posted their /proc/mtrr there, you can compare yours to them.
    In the end they come to the conclusion, that uncachable entries are not a problem, for the most systems.
    However uncachable regions of 1024MB seem to be too large.
    On my mtrr the biggest uncachable entry is 64MB.
    So you might get improvement from solving this.

  • Dual Monitor Support NEEDED

    [ Mac OS 10.4.8 - G$ QuickSilver Dual 2.0 - two large monitors ]
    I just tried Lightroom for the first time today, and was shocked to see that there is no support for detaching panels onto a second monitor. This is a deal-breaker for me -- lots of glitzy clutter and not enough image space. (Yeah, you can hide panels, but working with two monitors with one monitor reserved for panels is SO much nicer.) I am very concerned that this, along with the Bridge CS3 beta's lack of multiple monitor support is indicative of a very unfortunate trend with Adobe's interface design staff.
    And I hope they get the message loud and clear that a deprecation of multiple monitor support is UNACCEPTABLE.
    Also, the tabbed design of Adobe Camera Raw 4 as implemented in Photoshop CS3 is much nicer than the space-consuming approach in Lightroom.

    Well said, Dan. I think the thing that also troubles me is what you mention about being inbuilt from the ground up. The fact that it was considered "too difficult" to get in to v1.0 indicates that the framework of the application and the architecture therein isn't built in such a way as to make a second view of a particular image or set of images possible on a secondary monitor without significant development work. This will inevitably lead to a 'bolted on' look and feel as the holdouts within the lightroom team capitulate and shove in such support.
    If even partial support for simply showing one image - or heck, a slideshow - on a designated monitor (remember some people have more than 2, especially when presenting slideshows) were included in version 1, it would indicate to me that the architecture team "wanted to do it right" and had to put off some features until later. Having to completely bolt it on after the launch just means they couldn't even get it in the basic architecture.
    And, yes, Richard.... that one "feature" is certainly a deal breaker for me. "Usable" is in the mind of the "user" but usefulness is obvious. Let's consider a use-case scenario:
    I have a 23" cinema display, which I like to use for showing a Really Big Image, and i have a 21" Wacom cintiq on which I like to use the pen and tap on images to select or browse them and adjust sliders and whatnot. Don't tell me that the fact I can't do that with Lightroom isn't perfectly valid instant deal breaker! With Lightroom, I can either use my cinema display and get a kind-of large image and adjust with a mouse, or I can use my cintiq and get a pretty-darn-small image and use my pen. With Aperture, I can set the "main window" as my cintiq (although I do have to do this in the OS - a minor pain) but I can see the image I'm working with (or a set of several selected images) very large on my 23". Is that not an obviously better workflow? So much to possibly be a deal breaker _without_ really even getting in to some of the less-immediately-apparent features of Lightroom? For me, yes.
    Does anyone think I'm _really_ comparing apples to oranges when I look at Aperture and Lightroom side-by-side? I'm sure if I worked for Apple or Adobe, I'd try to make that claim, but as a user, what I think I am looking at are applications that let me organize, tag, view, and adjust a database of images. Which ever application is the most useful for doing those tasks wins. I hold out hope that Lightroom may one day be the winner in this arms race of image management and correction applications, but right now there is absolutely no way I can credit Lightroom with even being competitive with Aperture when one of my two monitors has to sit dark when I use Lightroom.

  • Lenovo 3000 N200 0769-ALU Dual Monitor Support

    My nephew has a Lenovo 3000 N200 0769-ALU, downgraded from Vista to XP.  Does this notebook support Dual Monitor Extended Desktop configuration?  If so, how is this configured?
    My nephew lives in a different city, so I am not able to just go over and lay w/ his machine.  I am familiar w/ the dual monitor support on my HP LapTop, but am not sure what to look for on the Lenovo.  Assistance is appreciated.
    ~ K

    Computer is working now. The hibernation is still a problem.
    I got a question though, i have SATA mode disabled now, but i'd like it to be enabled. How do i install this driver:
    http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/MIGR-67897.html

  • Feature Request - Better Multiple Monitor Support

    Lightroom's support for a second display has definitely helped my  workflow. I hope the team will consider adding more flexible multiple  monitor support in version 4. Here's why.
    I've recently  experimented with running one of my three screens in portrait mode. When  this screen hosts Lightroom's secondary display window in Loupe view,  my verticals finally get equal real estate for editing. While I've not  done hard statistics on my library, I know more than 50% of my imagery  is in portrait orientation.
    I'd like to see LR V4 support three or more screens so I could set up as follow:
    Screen 1 - main lightroom interface, would not need to be calibrated, for controls and navigation
    Screen  2 - Portrait orientation, loupe view - this would be a calibrated  display, all develop changes to verticals would be judged on this screen
    Screen  3 - Landscape orientation, loupe view - another calibrated display, all  develop changes to horizontals would be judged on this screen
    If  Adobe could make the app intelligent enough to route the image to the  correct screen based on orientation (recognizing and respecting cropping  that could change orientation) my edit sessions would certainly speed  up and I could maximize the productivity of multiple screens.
    I'd  be happy with this, but I'm also stymied by the need to switch back to  Library mode to tag images when my primary workflow has me in develop.  Ultimately everything depends on the quality of the image. Before I  invest in image-specific meta data, I have to process or at least  "test-process" an image. IMO the Quick Develop panel is useless, once  you become accustomed to the granular control of the develop sliders, it  just doesn't cut it.
    In the three monitor setup I described  above I'd love to be able to configure screen 1, with a combination of  panels from Library and Develop, so I could stay "develop centric" with  immediate access to keywording and meta. The two additional screens  would intelligently handle image display.
    I think this might  speed my workflow by 33% and having just returned from a Tour de France  project that generated 23,000 images I need all the productivity help I can  get.

    VeloDramatic wrote:
    Thanks for all those votes Rob. Now we just need to get the other 999,999 on board.
    Actually, this topic has come up a lot on this forum. At this point, I think we just need to get Adobe on board.
    VeloDramatic wrote:
     There may be another thread for this one additional thought. If Adobe does improve multiple monitor support, we should be able to optimize our previews for those screens. Even after prerendering 1:1 previews there are issues with DEVELOP doing its own thing (I believe) each time a new image is loaded. I make extensive use of the PREVIOUS button moving through my shoots and there's always a lag of one or two seconds while the develop preview loads before the button is active. In a desktop environment where multiple screens allow landscape and portrait images to be displayed full screen I'd argue that 100% of the host screen resolution would be the ideal preview. Hope that made sense.
    Yes, faster switching would be nice. I'm not sure what that would take. As it stands, there's like "9" previews generated when you do 1:1s - 100% down to tiny thumbnails. Still, one at exact monitor size that does not need to be resized at all does seem like it would be the fastest - I'm a bit on a limb though at this point.
    Rob

  • Dual Monitor Support No Longer Works

    Hi,
    I am using Lightroom 2.0 on a MacBook Pro with OS X 10.5.4
    Dual monitor support use to work with my Samsung external monitor. But now whenever I try to turn on dual monitor function, lightroom crashes. I know the external monitor and connection is working properly because I am able to use all of my other programs with both monitors, but no longer lightroom's dual monitor function.
    Any insight would be much appreciated.
    Thanks

    It was an extremely frustrating process trying to know if indeed this was the way to calibrate this monitor, and after spending so much time and research was all I could come up with. Did you notice the graphing results of both types of calibration? The red (I believe it was) of the RBG graph line was not lined up at all with the G and B thus the weird color on the monitor, and with the Easy mode, they were at least in line, more or less.

  • T420 - Triple Monitors/Enable Optimus?

    I have a T420, and am trying to run 3 monitors (2 external + the laptop display).  I am have hooked up one monitor to the VGA and another to the display port on my docking station, and am able to run 2 monitors in any combination.  However it won't let me do 3.
    According to what I read here http://forums.lenovo.com/t5/Options-Accessories/Mini-Dock-Plus-Series-3-with-Triple-Monitors/td-p/57..., I should make sure Optimus is enabled.  How exactly do I do this?  I saw one note regarding the bios, but I didn't see the setting there that referenced Optimus.
    Thanks!

    exlim wrote:
    I have a T420, and am trying to run 3 monitors (2 external + the laptop display).  I am have hooked up one monitor to the VGA and another to the display port on my docking station, and am able to run 2 monitors in any combination.  However it won't let me do 3.
    According to what I read here http://forums.lenovo.com/t5/Options-Accessories/Mini-Dock-Plus-Series-3-with-Triple-Monitors/td-p/57..., I should make sure Optimus is enabled.  How exactly do I do this?  I saw one note regarding the bios, but I didn't see the setting there that referenced Optimus.
    Thanks!
    Which model T420 do you have?

  • FX5900-TD128 - Dual monitor support?

    ?(
    I'm thinking of buy a FX5900-TD128 card, but I want dual monitor support (2 CRTs).  I looked on the product info page, but it doesn't explicitly say the card can actually do this... I don't want to find out the hard way by dropping $400+ on a card and then finding out it can't do something I need  ;(
    BTW: I assume this thing will fit fine in a 865PE Neo2-LS mobo... right?
    Thanks

    Quote
    Originally posted by Assaf
    Looks like it should fit, but I didn\'t actually try to install it in a 865PE Neo2 yet.
    It would be a logical assumption that MSI's designers would get their gfx cards to fit their own mobos  :D  
    I haven't seen anyone complain so it should be ok.
    Thanks.

  • NB520 - Multiple monitor support

    Do NB520 have multiple monitor support built in, if not, how can I have multiple monitor support for my NB520? I need for using a Pewerpoint 2007 (to display presenter view differs from audience view).
    Many thanks for an answer in advance.

    Hi smit_Aood,
    The NB520 supports one external monitor and you can use internal + external monitor at the same time (two monitors are supported). Furthermore you can choose if you want to extend the desktop on second monitor or clone it.
    Using FN+F5 key combination you can switch between different modes.
    Last but not least you can also use a Beamer or TV as second monitor. A certain computer monitor is not required. ;)

  • Need Xorg config file for dual graphics cards, triple monitors

    Hey guys, I'm having a bit of trouble getting triple monitors working on my system. The two plugged into the graphics card (radeon x300) work fine, but the one plugged into onboard graphics (geforce 6150SE) refuses to appear in xrandr. I figure I need to make a /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-monitor.conf file but I'm confused about how to do it with separate cards. I find the wiki instructions that I can find confusing, as I've never had to deal with xorg files before (has always autoconfigured for me no problems).
    Relevant code:
    [greg@spacebar ~]$ lspci | grep VGA
    00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation C61 [GeForce 6150SE nForce 430] (rev a2)
    02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV370 5B60 [Radeon X300 (PCIE)]
    [greg@spacebar ~]$ xrandr
    Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 2960 x 1050, maximum 4096 x 4096
    VGA-0 connected 1280x1024+1680+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 338mm x 270mm
    1280x1024 60.0*+ 75.0
    1152x864 75.0
    1024x768 75.1 60.0
    800x600 75.0 60.3
    640x480 75.0 60.0
    720x400 70.1
    DVI-0 connected 1680x1050+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 430mm x 270mm
    1680x1050 59.9*+
    1280x1024 75.0 60.0
    1152x864 75.0
    1024x768 75.1 60.0
    800x600 75.0 60.3
    640x480 75.0 60.0
    720x400 70.1
    S-video disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
    [greg@spacebar ~]$ pacman -Q | grep xf86-video
    xf86-video-ati 6.14.3-1
    xf86-video-nouveau 0.0.16_git20120106-1
    xf86-video-vesa 2.3.0-7
    [greg@spacebar ~]$ cat /etc/mkinitcpio.conf | grep MODULES=
    MODULES="radeon nouveau"
    I just can't seem to understand how to write the 10-monitor.conf file. I was wondering if anyone could give me a hand?
    Also, the third monitor to be connected via onboard VGA is also 1280x1024 and will be left of the other two.

    Depends on the motherboard. This one allows you to enable the onboard graphics only when no external card is found, or always enable. The PCI-E card initialises first, if that helps.
    EDIT: Also I can confirm that it can run both cards (all three monitors) at the same time by switching to initialise the onboard card first, however that makes some weird stuff happen so I switched it back. And also the nouveau driver is shown in lsmod, and gets detected in the boot message logs.
    Last edited by MisterAnderson (2012-01-26 16:56:58)

  • UltraSharp 2407FPW 24.0-inch Wide Flat Panel LCD Monitor Supports HDCP,

    The Dell UltraSharp 2407FPW 24.0-inch Wide Flat Panel LCD Monitor Supports HDCP. I am going to order a Mac Pro and it has an Ati Radeon X1900 XT which is HDCP ready. But I really want an Apple Cinema 30 inch Display. Does anyone know how long it is going to take Apple to release the new displays with HDCP? And does anyone recommend the Dell Monitor> Is it better than the Apple Cinema Displays? Thank You.

    looking at both up close I think the 3007WFP looks nicer than the apple 30 inch, it also supports HDCP.

  • T410 triple monitor capability??

    Hi all,
    I currently use my T410 (w/ NVS3100MS optimus tech) with a LCD via DisplayPort.
    I have another monitor at home with RGB connector.
    I've tried connecting 2 external monitors to have a triple monitor but it did not work.
    I went through the web and looks like for any T410 model, to make a triple monitor i have to have a mini dock.
    Is that the only option??
    Hope anyone knows about this issue. Thanks a lot

    If you had the Tx20 series you would be able to do it without a dock.

  • Triple Monitor on T500 with RC and beta drivers...

    Hello all I was running a beta driver from the beta Lenovo website and was able to run triple monitors.
    Now with the RTM I cannot...
    I was hoping that someone might have the old version of the beta drivers that Lenovo had on the beta site last year aroung May/June...
    This was running without any extra hardware, it allowed windows to "see" both display drivers and allow them to be used.
    If someone want I can send you a pic as proof, but could you please send me the old drivers for the "switchable graphics" ( I think that was the thing.)
    This is a laptop T500 w the ATI 3650 HD and the intel express graphics card built in.
    Thanks in advance.

    What display are you using? Are you using a direct HDMI connection or are you using an adapter?

  • MacPro3,1 triple monitor setup

    Hi there!
    I'm looking to expand my Apple 30" monitor setup with two (very cheap but highly acclaimed) Dell UltraSharp™ U2311H monitors. However, I'm unsure if I do or do not need an additional video card and if so, which one. I have an NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT with (I think) two DVI-I Dual Link ports. I've read that there are DVI-splitters, but I have been unable to find any conclusive information.
    Does anyone know how I can do this?
    Friendly greetings, D, Amsterdam.

    Hi Grant!
    Thanks for your help earlier ;-)
    I hope you might be able to shed some light on a little problem I have with my triple monitor setup. I bought the following items:
    Two Dell Professional P2411H 61cm (24") LED monitors.
    Two MiniDisplayPort to DVI adapters.
    I've took your advice on the card and also got one ATI RADEON HD 5770 1GB-ZML card.
    The monitors, in combination with the adapters and the card ... it all works, but there's one limitation I believe shouldn't be there.
    The problem is this: either the hardware or software is only allowing me to connect two displays in total. If I connect all three displays, only the Dell monitors are able to connect. If I disconnect one Dell monitor, the Apple 30" display goes live. So, whatever in whatever combination or order I try to connect the displays, only two screens are connecting simultaneously.
    Do you, or does someone else know how to fix this? Would be great to fix this soon and become the pixonaut of my own digitale cockpit!

Maybe you are looking for