[linux] 9.0.115.0 causes CPU 100% with firefox

The 9.0.115.0 version of FlashPlayer causes 80-100% CPU
consumption with latest Firefox on linux.
The only solution I found, I get back to the 48... Can you
fix it? Can you help me?

I have the same problem with 9.0.115.0 in Linux.
I have posted a bug-report to Adobe support last week - no
reaction yet.
Good site for testing is:
http://www.lanik.us/misc/ff-flash-test.html

Similar Messages

  • I keep getting a box that pops up saying "High CPU useage with Firefox". What do I do?

    Sometimes a box pops up saying "High CPU usage with Firefox".
    I'm not sure what to do or if this is harming my laptop.

    Well i tried the Microsoft Malware and everything is fine on this end and you are still crashing on me so with that said,i am giving you one more day to resolve this issue if i still get crashes from you i am sorry to say i will have to try another company as my browser and see if i have an issue with them if i don't,i will not be reinstalling Firefox again if i do,then it may be another issue so i will have to see but i have no Malware here but thank you for your response anyway...

  • [help] yelp causes cpu 100% load

    Hi everyone,
    When I run yelp, cpu runs 100%. No other message is printed. Thanks for help

    I have the same problem.  I searched the gnome bugzilla for yelp, but I didn't see any reports of high cpu usage.

  • Cpu 100% with getScaledInstance

    Any help on this appreciated....
    I have a subclass of JPanel which I use to display an image which can be changed by other parts of the code (within an actionlistener on a button). When the invoking method calls setImage on this class it then calls a repaint();
    The sample below works fine if I drawImage the original (image). However, if I scale the image first (with getScaledInstance) and try and drawImage the CPU on the machine goes up to 100% and stays there until I close the app.
    No doubt I'm missing something obvious here.... any help?
    class ImagePanel extends JPanel {
    Image image;
    public ImagePanel() {
    super();
    public ImagePanel(Image image) {
    this.image = image;
    public void setImage(Image image) {
    this.image = image;
    public void paintComponent(Graphics g) {
    super.paintComponent(g); //paint background
    if (image != null) {
    Image toDisplay;
    toDisplay = image.getScaledInstance(-1, getHeight()-5, image.SCALE_AREA_AVERAGING);
    g.drawImage(toDisplay, 2, 2, this);
    }

    I think the problem is with the paintComponent method hich is getting called infinite times, causing outofmemory error. The scaledInstance() method is working fine. I modified your program to use a JLabel as to a JPanel and the program is working just fine. Below is the code sample.
    import java.awt.BorderLayout;
    import java.awt.Image;
    import java.awt.Toolkit;
    import javax.swing.ImageIcon;
    import javax.swing.JFrame;
    import javax.swing.JLabel;
    import javax.swing.WindowConstants;
    class ImagePanel extends JLabel {
         Image image;
         public ImagePanel() {
              super();
         public ImagePanel(Image image) {
              super(new ImageIcon(image.getScaledInstance(-1, 100, Image.SCALE_AREA_AVERAGING)));
         public static void main(String args []) {
              JFrame f = new JFrame("Test");
              f.setDefaultCloseOperation(WindowConstants.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
              ImagePanel imagePanel = new ImagePanel(Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getImage(ImagePanel.class.getResource("test.jpg")));
              f.getContentPane().add(imagePanel, BorderLayout.CENTER);
              f.pack();
              f.setVisible(true);
    }Hope this helps
    Sai Pullabhotla

  • CPU 100 % --With Netty and JDK 1.5

    I am using netty with JDK 1.5
    During the issue have observed intermittent high CPU for above process on the Server
    In the collected thread dumps most of the threads
    are in runnable state at sun.nio.ch.DevPollArrayWrapper.poll0 method.
    java application produces more and more CPU load over time, due to an increasing
    number of threads which are spinning around a poll() system call.
    Thank in advance

    with Solaris 5.10

  • Why do I keep getting a Norton pop up message "High CPU useage with Firefox"?

    I am not running any other applications when I get this message. Do I need to make some kind of setting change on my PC?

    IMO, the detection threshold is set too low in that Norton app. Contact Norton support to find out how to set it higher, or how to turn it off.
    Or quit using Norton. ''I hate the garbage they sell. IMO, it is good for one thing, making money for retailer's and for helping PC techs make money fixing what it does to PC's their customers bring in for repairs.''
    http://community.norton.com/norton/

  • What woudl cause installation failure with firefox 3.6 & other recent versions?

    Firefox 3.6 installtion failure of download
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == install download ==
    == User Agent ==
    Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

    Hi Richie.
    Have you tried re-downloading the installer? You can get it for free at [http:/www.getfirefox.com getfirefox.com].

  • Putting ActiveX(packager) in CTabCtrl will cause CPU increase up to 100%

    Putting ActiveX(packager) in CTabCtrl will cause CPU increase up to 100%, and the whole system hangs.(When the test application loses its focus).
    Could you tell me why?
    Thanks.

    Ken McEwen wrote:
     Have reinstalled Lion overnight and it seems to be limping along this morning, although the wi-fi is dropping repeatedly.  
    How I wish I had followed my usual rule and waited until at least OSX 10.7.1 before installing.
    How did you "reinstall?" Others are reporting that installing from scratch is working better. If you're going to keep trying with Lion, I'd recommend posting in the Lion forum: https://discussions.apple.com/community/mac_os/mac_os_x_v10.7_lion (wow, I almost said "Windows forum," hmmm ).
    I may get in at 7.1, more likely at 7.2, but only if things look like they've changed enough. This appears to me to be on par with the change from 9 to X, and I waited until 10.2.3 with that one. If/when I do change, I'll have an up to the minute SL clone ready to reinstall if needed, and even then, I'll probably put 10.7 on an external HD.

  • Root cause for 100 % disk utilization

    Hi All,
    Whenever in one of the dailog instance disk utilization is showing 100% sap system is getting very slow,what is the root cause for 100% utilization .At that moment of time when I checked the CPU usage it showed 98% CPU idle. server is on Windows NT and around 13GB of RAM is always free.
    We have only one drive in the apps server.Can this be the cause of 100% disk utilization?
    Waiting for ur frequent responses.
    Regards,
    Prashant

    Hi,
    I have answered similar questions :
    [Re: Disk Utilization 100%]
    as described above, one thing that cause 100% disk utilization is that writer processes (and read process too) is concentrated only on a single disk (equivalent to single volume group or single logical volume).
    we can imagine that a large number of user hitting the single disk (where datafiles exist) on the same time with a huge transaction load.
    if we can manage writable datafiles in several locations (equivalent to several volume groups or several logical volumes) where several datafiles exist, writer processes (and read process too) will be distributed to that several locations, so that each location (each disk, each VG or each LV) utilization may not reach 100%.
    so it is important to design writable datafiles in multiple location in different disks to prevent 100% disk utilization.
    one thing should be remember is to consult with hardware and storage vendor if there is any possibilities bottleneck or I/O issue on your hardware or storage.
    hope it help you.
    rgds,
    Alfonsus Guritno

  • 一条SQL占用CPU 100%

    一个查询语句执行时占用单核CPU资源100%,请帮忙分析原因。
    SQL及执行计划如下:
    *** 2012-08-29 11:46:25.764
    WAIT #9: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 16994971 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660142349078
    STAT #7 id=1 cnt=3 pid=0 pos=1 obj=0 op='HASH GROUP BY (cr=8283188 pr=0 pw=0 time=75576024 us)'
    STAT #7 id=2 cnt=3 pid=1 pos=1 obj=0 op='NESTED LOOPS (cr=8283188 pr=0 pw=0 time=22207347 us)'
    STAT #7 id=3 cnt=20138 pid=2 pos=1 obj=0 op='NESTED LOOPS (cr=58213 pr=0 pw=0 time=503569 us)'
    STAT #7 id=4 cnt=20138 pid=3 pos=1 obj=16923 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID REAL_XS_BMSDHZ (cr=17935 pr=0 pw=0 time=161196 us)'
    STAT #7 id=5 cnt=20138 pid=4 pos=1 obj=16925 op='INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_REAL_XS_BMSDHZ_SP (cr=205 pr=0 pw=0 time=20201 us)'
    STAT #7 id=6 cnt=20138 pid=3 pos=2 obj=16307 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BM (cr=40278 pr=0 pw=0 time=263247 us)'
    STAT #7 id=7 cnt=20138 pid=6 pos=1 obj=16308 op='INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_BM (cr=20140 pr=0 pw=0 time=130059 us)'
    STAT #7 id=8 cnt=3 pid=2 pos=2 obj=16307 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BM (cr=8224975 pr=0 pw=0 time=75131469 us)'
    STAT #7 id=9 cnt=3 pid=8 pos=1 obj=16309 op='INDEX UNIQUE SCAN BM_BMDM (cr=8224972 pr=0 pw=0 time=75063047 us)'
    STAT #7 id=10 cnt=12084 pid=9 pos=1 obj=0 op='NESTED LOOPS (cr=8204832 pr=0 pw=0 time=74863852 us)'
    STAT #7 id=11 cnt=3452523 pid=10 pos=1 obj=16924 op='INDEX RANGE SCAN PK_REAL_XS_BMSDHZ (cr=1287698 pr=0 pw=0 time=34756285 us)'
    STAT #7 id=12 cnt=12084 pid=10 pos=2 obj=16307 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BM (cr=6917134 pr=0 pw=0 time=36180549 us)'
    STAT #7 id=13 cnt=3452523 pid=12 pos=1 obj=16308 op='INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_BM (cr=3464611 pr=0 pw=0 time=17895710 us)'
    =====================
    PARSING IN CURSOR #5 len=985 dep=0 uid=36 oct=3 lid=36 tim=1314660142349798 hv=3549420567 ad='fb568520'
    SELECT C.BMDM,
    C.DEPT_NAME,
    A.XSSD1,
    A.XSSD2,
    0 XSJE,
    0 XSBS,
    0 YHJE,
    0 XSJE_BHQ,
    SUM (A.XSJE) OLD_XSJE,
    SUM (A.YHJE) OLD_YHJE,
    SUM (A.XSJE - A.YHJE) OLD_XSJE_BHQ,
    SUM (A.XSBS) OLD_XSBS,
    0 COMPARE,
    0 KDJ,
    0 OLD_KDJ,
    0 KDJ_BHQ,
    0 OLD_KDJ_BHQ
    FROM REAL_XS_BMSDHZ A, BM B, BM C
    WHERE A.DEPTID = B.DEPTID
    AND SUBSTR (B.BMDM, 1, 4) = C.BMDM
    AND A.JZRQ = '2012-8-22'
    AND NOT EXISTS
    (SELECT 1
    FROM REAL_XS_BMSDHZ Z1, BM B1
    WHERE Z1.XSSD1 = A.XSSD1
    AND Z1.DEPTID = B1.DEPTID
    AND SUBSTR (B1.BMDM, 1, 4) = C.BMDM
    AND Z1.JZRQ = '2012-8-23')
    GROUP BY C.BMDM,
    C.DEPT_NAME,
    A.XSSD1,
    A.XSSD2
    END OF STMT
    PARSE #5:c=0,e=186,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660142349795
    EXEC #5:c=0,e=128,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660142350084
    WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660142350130
    WAIT #5: nam='gc cr block 2-way' ela= 394 p1=129 p2=25709 p3=1 obj#=16923 tim=1314660144811060
    *** 2012-08-29 11:47:46.104
    FETCH #5:c=80317790,e=78455566,p=0,cr=8283188,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660220805742
    WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 3424 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660220809320
    WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660220809468
    FETCH #5:c=0,e=78,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=2,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660220809529
    WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 12233 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660220821911
    =====================
    在fetch阶段出现耗费大量CPU等待时间，这是为何？
    环境：
    OS：
    lsb_release -d
    Description: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 8)
    数据库版本：
    SQL> select * From v$version;
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
    TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production

    bf01</oracle/admin/bfdb/udump>$cat /proc/cpuinfo
    processor : 0
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 3
    siblings : 4
    core id : 12
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4270.34
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 1
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 8
    siblings : 4
    core id : 32
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.12
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 2
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 4
    siblings : 4
    core id : 16
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.11
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 3
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 15
    siblings : 4
    core id : 60
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.08
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 4
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 3
    siblings : 4
    core id : 13
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.00
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 5
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 8
    siblings : 4
    core id : 33
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.22
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 6
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 4
    siblings : 4
    core id : 17
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.06
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 7
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 15
    siblings : 4
    core id : 61
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.10
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 8
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 3
    siblings : 4
    core id : 14
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.12
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 9
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 8
    siblings : 4
    core id : 34
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.21
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 10
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 4
    siblings : 4
    core id : 18
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.08
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 11
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 15
    siblings : 4
    core id : 62
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.09
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 12
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 3
    siblings : 4
    core id : 15
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.01
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 13
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 8
    siblings : 4
    core id : 35
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.07
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 14
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 4
    siblings : 4
    core id : 19
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.13
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 15
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 15
    siblings : 4
    core id : 63
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.11
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:

  • ASE freeze with CPU 100% and IO 0%

    Hi,
    I have a production ASE server using 30 CPU's that's is "freezing" several times in the last week (requiring an machine reboot) and from the last sysmon taken we see that the first 4 cpu are 100% with IO 0%.
      Engine Busy Utilization        CPU Busy   I/O Busy       Idle                
        Engine 0                      100.0 %      0.0 %      0.0 %             
        Engine 1                      100.0 %      0.0 %      0.0 %             
        Engine 2                      100.0 %      0.0 %      0.0 %             
        Engine 3                      100.0 %      0.0 %      0.0 %             
        Engine 4                      100.0 %      0.0 %      0.0 %
        Engine 5                       44.5 %     19.7 %     35.8 %             
        Engine 6                       62.4 %     24.7 %     12.9 %             
    From SysWaits we see that event 29 (waiting for regular buffer read to complete) is high when we experience this problem.
    No change was reported and the users and saying the system to be in the overall slower in the last weeks.
    The version is the old 12.5.4 with the latest patch available and the OS is HP-UX.The machine has 256Gb of memory.
    As anyone experienced a behavior like this?
    Thanks

    Hi Ricardo
    I have seen this when underlying storage changed from raw SAN devices to NAS file system devices.
    tempdb writes after a certain amount of volume queued up in a serial way choking the whole server.
    This may or may not be what is happening on your server.
    Having said that : If this is not something new  then what was the last change in your case ?
    Especially related to storage
    Wait event 29 is related to storage and  I/O.
    Avinash

  • Password Manager 4.6 and 4.7 causes CPU loop in tzres.dll

    T510 running Windows 7x64.  T510 is in a constant CPU loop with WMIPRVSE consuming the CPU as per Process Explorer.  Using Microsoft Sysinterals Process Monitor determine that the cause is constant calls to access tzres.dll.  Reboot in clean mode and one my one activate services and startup programs until the loop is observed.  It is only observed when Password Manager is started.  Do an uninstall of 4.7 and the problem goes away.  Start with 4.0 of Password Manager.  Each release from 4.0 to 4.5 work fine with no loop.  Installing 4.6 or 4.7 cause the loop.  All Lenovo drivers and programs are current.
    Any ideas?  Tom

    I'm testing a beta version of Password Manager which has solved the issue that I was experiencing.
    W520, i7-2820QM, BIOS 1.42, 1920x1080 FHD, 32 GB RAM, 2000M NVIDIA GPU, Samsung 850 Pro 1TB SSD, Crucial M550 mSata 512GB, WD 2TB USB 3.0, eSata Plextor PX-LB950UE BluRay
    W520, i7-2760QM, BIOS 1.42 1920x1080 FHD, 32 GB RAM, 1000M NVIDIA GPU, Crucial M500 480GB mSata SSD, Hitachi 500GB HDD, WD 2TB USB 3.0

  • Space designer causing cpu spike overload

    Hope you guys can help with this, it's beginning to annoy me. I'm currently unable to use space designer reliably. I had this problem in Logic 8 and it's still happening in 9. I have one instance of SD in my current project and it's causing cpu spikes that are giving me errors. The funny thing is that the error happens just after a region that is being sent to the reverb has ended. the cpu meter then gradually rises until the error stops playback. If I turn SD off i don't get these problems or if I disable SD via automation when it's not needed it seems ok also. What the **** is this about? The thing is I really like the sound of SD and miss it when I have to use different reverbs. Anyone else having these issues? I read on another thread that setting all your inputs to "no input" helps but for me it doesn't. What else can I try?
    cheers
    p

    Thanks for your input.
    Just to clarify, I am getting the spike once the audio data stops sending through the SD plugin (whilst the song is still playing). So, for example I may send a 10 second bit of audio through the plug - this works fine. Then once the audio stops sending and the reverb trail finishes....I then get the CPU going mad - and yet there is complete silence within the song - there is nothing else playing!
    This has got to be a bug or conflict of some kind - my computer spec is massive and should be able to cope with a stereo bit of audio through one plugin! (Hope this makes sense.)
    There have been a couple of posts similar but no answers as yet...
    Wondering whether it is a conflict with UAD plugins or something which limits the reproduction of this bug...I have noticed that if I remove all UAD plugins from the channel strip in question, the error tends not to reappear - but the issue is unique to the SD plugin.
    Danny

  • CPU 100% When Playing Minecraft iMac

    Hi There!
    As the title says, "CPU 100% When Playing Minecraft". Every time I boot up Minecraft the Fan becomes loud. I have another iMac (Late 2013) Model and it runs Minecraft fine with all the same settings. So I don't really no what to do. But if you could help me try to get the CPU usage down or maybe turn the fan down? Or something like that that would be great!!
    My iMac Specs.
    Mac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2014)
    Processor: 4 GHz Intel Core i7
    Memory: 32 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
    Graphics: AMD Radeon R9 M295X 4096 MB
    So Yeah, if you could give me a hand, I would be so much appreciated!
    Thanks!

    Firefox 3.6.6 Windows XP - often goes to 80-100% CPU even with only one tab open (in this case the one I'm writing this message on). When this happens the only cure is to kill it with task manager and start again.

  • Firefox 3.6.6 hogs CPU 100% when playing embeded ogg video

    it's really not content-related. I played the same content with an external player, and the cpu load varied between 12-40% with spikes to 50%.
    HTML5 video support is great, the performance not so. Any hints?

    Firefox 3.6.6 Windows XP - often goes to 80-100% CPU even with only one tab open (in this case the one I'm writing this message on). When this happens the only cure is to kill it with task manager and start again.

Maybe you are looking for