Linux RHES 4 update 3

The installation of ebusiness suite is completed. Apache is running but when i want to go to the Rapidinstall site, i get a message
"Connection was refused when attempting to contact."
When i type echo $ORACLE_HOME i get nothing.
I think it is something with the enviroment settings but i dont know how to set them right.
Can anybody help me ?
Thanks

Hello Jiang
I am facing the same error while installing ocfs2 on RHEL4 and here is last 20 lines from my dmesg,
device-mapper: dm-multipath version 1.0.5 loaded
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on sda1, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
Adding 1736696k swap on /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01. Priority:-1 extents:1
parport0: PC-style at 0x378 [PCSPP,TRISTATE]
ip_tables: (C) 2000-2002 Netfilter core team
ip_tables: (C) 2000-2002 Netfilter core team
ip_tables: (C) 2000-2002 Netfilter core team
configfs: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
i2c /dev entries driver
eth0: no IPv6 routers present
eth1: no IPv6 routers present
Hangcheck: starting hangcheck timer 0.9.0 (tick is 30 seconds, margin is 180 seconds).
Hangcheck: Using get_cycles().
mtrr: your processor doesn't support write-combining
configfs: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
configfs: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
configfs: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
configfs: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Following is the output of ocfs2 packages installed.
uname -r
2.6.9-89.ELsmp
#rpm -qa --qf "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}_%{ARCH}
n" |grep ocfs2
nocfs2console-1.2.7-1.el4_i386
nocfs2-tools-1.2.7-1.el4_i386
nocfs2-2.6.9-89.EL-1.2.9-1.el4_i686
nocfs2-2.6.9-89.ELsmp-1.2.9-1.el4_i686
Appreciate if anyone could help me.
Thanks,
Anil

Similar Messages

Plz help me to decide glibc version for linux RHE 4 and suitable RPM

hi folks,
in my project , i m installing linux rhe 4 on oracle 10.2.0.2 .
plz suggest me suitable glibc version with corrosponding updated version of RPM package.
thanks

Dear Ranjan,
it is always recommended to use the latest available version of glibc. You can use the Red Hat tool 'up2date' to get the latest glibc packages provided through the Red Hat Network (RHN). Currently, glibc-2.3.4-2.36 is the latest one available (as far as I know).
Thanks,
Hannes Kuehnemund
SAP LinuxLab

Problem installing Oracle Linux Release 5 Update 2 from Oracle e-Delivery

Hello
I have been trying to install Oracle Linux Release 5 Update 2 from Oracle e-Delivery so that I can install Oracle 11g express edition beta.
Here are the steps that I took and the problem that I am having:
1. I downloaded the file, unzipped the file twice, which gave me 3,042 files and 13 folders with the total size = 3.07 GB.
2. I put in the DVD and restarted my PC hoping that my PC will boot from the DVD, but instead Window started.
I reported this issue to tech support from e-Delivery, but they referred me to contact you. Please assist.
Julia

3,042 files and 13 folders with the total size = 3.07 GBWhich download .zip did you choose from edelivery? Under linux-x64 I peeked "Oracle Linux Release 5 Update 2 for x86_64 (64 Bit) - DVD" file V15099-01.zip downloaded, it has just the one .iso file. You'll need to burn that to DVD, but with burn s/w that handles ISO files.
Also keep in mind you'll need 64 bit hardware (amd/intel 64? itanium? those are different), the only *nix platform I've got handy to try it out is -x86 :(

Business use Linux, then Linux needs a update for ...

We needs a update for the same version windows and mac!!
the skype 4.1 for linux is a garbage, very bad!!
I was a pay user but i cancel my account because it, in business we needs a good softwere!

I used Adambonello's fix and it worked?http://forums.creative.com/creativel...mp=true#M80097

Oracle Linux 5.5 updates?

Lately it seems that the Oracle Linux 5.5 channel is very quiet, now that Oracle Linux 5.6 is out and getting updates. My question is whether there will be any updates to 5.5 in the future, or is it kind of frozen, and all new features/fixes will go into 5.6?

user1175485 wrote:
Lately it seems that the Oracle Linux 5.5 channel is very quiet, now that Oracle Linux 5.6 is out and getting updates. My question is whether there will be any updates to 5.5 in the future, or is it kind of frozen, and all new features/fixes will go into 5.6?That's how Enterprise Linux works. Once a new update comes out, the older update versions remain static. This means you can keep your servers on exactly the right version of each package you want. If you subscribe to the "latest" channel (available on ULN), then your system will automatically upgrade from Update to Update, i.e. it would've jumped from EL5U5 to EL5U6 automatically.

Poll: linux-ck package update rate

I wanted to solicit some feedback from the users of the linux-ck kernel package and of course from users using the pre-compiled binaries from the unofficial llinux-ck repo. How rapid a tempo do you prefer for the linux-ck package/what are the minumum required patchsets for me to bump the release up?
As they are currently defined:
Required components of the PKG
*Upstream kernel source
*ARCH configs
*CK patches (from Con Kolivas)
Optional components of the PKG
*BFQ patches (from Paolo Valente)
Some history:
When 2.6.x went to 3.0.x, it took 5-6 weeks for Paolo to update the BFQ patchset for the 3.0 tree.
When 3.1 just went to 3.2 we got a partial ck1 patchset. CK said sometime next week for the full ck1 patchset and Paolo said the same for BFQ, so let's say 2 weeks there.
I found a free survey site to keep track of responses. Please do not vote here in this forum.
Link to survey and thanks for your opinions.
EDIT: Link to the results.
Last edited by graysky (2012-03-16 19:40:30)

graysky wrote:Ah, love it. Opinions are split more or less into thirds. So any action I take will piss off 2/3rds of the group
Thats the danger of giving people options: the more options you offer, the larger portion of people who will be pissed off when you make a decision.
Perhaps if you chose first, then gave a poll with just that one option, everyone could feel like they got what they wanted

Firefox 13 linux checks for updates and says it is up to date even though my other systems have auto-updated a week or two ago.

My firefox auto-updated to 10.0, 10.0.1, 11, and 12. but would not auto-update to 13.0 so I manually downloaded and updated. now that 14 is out it still won't auto-update. by which I mean when I go to HELP, ABOUT, it says it is fire fox 13.0, says it's checking for updates (very very briefly) then says "firefox is up to date". several other systems have auto-updated from 13 to 14, a couple of weeks ago but this one refuses. what's wrong here?

You will be slightly behind if you use Linux and their own version of Firefox instead of the Mozilla standard version. (Not of course standard in some Linux distros)
I use Ubuntu, and their Canonical Firefox Aurora just updated I think yesterday from fx15 to fx16. {''Mozilla/5.0 (X11;''' Ubuntu'''; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/16.0 Firefox/16.0'' ]
I also have the Mozilla Firefox Release 64bit and that updated as expected a while ago from fx13 to fx14. {''Mozilla/5.0 (X11; '''Linux''' x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1'']
Not sure why fx13 is not updating for you.
Maybe something to do with your distro IF it is their version. IIRC some early Ubuntu LTS versions probably did not update Firefox. But you may have the Mozilla version as your system info aside shows ''User Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; '''Linux '''i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/13.0''
You could just download the latest version from
* http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all.html
Just take care not to delete the existing firefox profile, preferably back it up first just in case.
*[[back up and restore information in Firefox profiles]]

Solaris 10 NFS performance on Linux running ws3 update 3

Hope someone can help me sort out this problem.
Dear Support.
We are having a Solaris/Sparc file server running Solaris 10. The Solaris machine act as a NFS file server. We encounter very poor NFS performance when copying files to and from a filesystem via Linux NFS
I have set up a very simple test scenario. Created a tar file, size around 3 GB. The file is sitting on a SAN system. The file it self is created on a Solaris 10 UFS filesystem.
Solaris E240 Solaris 8 NFS, GB interface copy to and from the same disk via NFS
timecp /seis/seis600_new/usr.tar /seis/seis600_new/new1.tar
real 2m18.91s
user 0m0.11s
sys 0m29.72s
IBM/AMD 64 bit Linux WS3 U5, GB interface NFS to and from the same disk via NFS.
time cp /seis/seis600_new/usr.tar /seis/seis600_new/new1.tar
real 6m24.670s
user 0m0.130s
sys 0m21.860s
Also run the test on other Linux boxes with similar results?
The funny part of this is that I can reproduce the performance problem on other SUN systems among the SUN Blade 2000 with 8 GB Ram
Let me wrap up.
Always bad NFS performance when using NFS between Solaris NFS server and Linux client.
Not always bad performance when using NFS between Solaris server and clients.

It's been a while since I was doing linux->solaris nfs, so bear with me as I clear out the cobwebs.
First things to check: Mount options for the nfs mount to the server.
Which versions of nfs are you using?(v2, v3?) Solaris uses version 3 mounts by default.
What's your wsize and rsize for reads and writes?
I believe linux is limited to using 8k r/w block sizes. Solaris will let you use r/wsize up to 32k in nfsv3, which would really help with larger data transfers.
nfsv3 has a number of performance enhancements over v2, so give that a shot with a larger block size.
nfsvers=3,wsize=8192,rsize=8192,nolock,intr
Also experiment with your locking options, that might help some.
NFS has always been a fairly weak point for linux.
A few links for reference:
http://www.scd.ucar.edu/hps/TECH/LINUX/linux.html
http://nfs.sourceforge.net/
Cheers && good luck,
fptt.

Setting for Linux-RHE-release3 for installing SAP-BW3.5

Hi folks,
Plz let me know about all sort of linux setting like suitable kernal and its parameters,swap space for installing sap-bw 3.5 with oracle 10.2.0.3.
its urgent .
thanks

Hi Eric,

> Oracle 10.2.0.3 is not supported, use 10.2.0.3 instead.
Typo? You probably meant 10.2.0.2...
Best regards,
Elmar.

BI (BOE) XI R3.1 (Linux) Server Migration - Update BOE base directory path

Hello,
Performing a server migration using BOE XI R3.1 (from BOE XI R3.1 to same release BOE XI R3.1) on Linux Platform.
After performing a data restore, the BOE server executables could not be launched (do not start) due to different BOE base directory path in these environments.
Could someone help point me on how to edit server configuration data to correct the base path in the migrated server?

Hi,
Thanks for the input. Unfortunately, I don't see an option in ccm.sh to delete sia/servers.. Using serverconfig.sh, I tried to recreate the sia using option 1 - Add a Server Intelligence Agent, and this option is supposed to recreate the sia and default servers if it already exists in the database. However, this yields same result: CMS is running with correct base path, but all servers are not launched since the server configuration path reflects the from environment, and not the current/target environment.
Thanks again.

When will the Linux version be updated to include 64-bit AMD???

I have Debian 6.0.3 on a multi-core AMD processor running a 64-bit kernel and filesystems. Would like to install firefox, but linux at present seems to only be 32-bit

You can download Linux 64-bit versions of Firefox 8 from here: 
http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest-8.0/linux-x86_64/

Please advise Migrating of OS from Solaris to Red Hat Enterprise Linux(RHE

Hi Experts,
We are in process of Upgrading EBS from 12.0.4 to 12.0.6 and Migrating of OS from Solaris to Red Hat Enterprise Linux(RHEL).
Current system Details: EBS Version: 12.0.4 DB Version: 10.2.0.3 OS Version : Solaris 10.
1. Do we need to upgrade first or Migrate the OS First? If so why? Please advise
2. What is the minimum database version to be upgraded for upgrading from 12.0.4 to 12.0.6 ? Please advise
3. When will the support for this version of upgraded database expires? Please advise
4. Minimum downtime required to upgrade the database, application and migrate the OS? Please advise
5. Documents to follow for Upgradation and Migration? Please advise
Regards
Mohammed. Abdul Muqeet

Including to What John Said you have to Refer for MOS notes Such as :
Application Tier Platform Migration with Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12 [ID 438086.1]

Installing ocfs2 on Linux RedHat 4 update 3 (64 bit)

OCFS2 being now certified on Linux RedHat 64 bit (since June second), we installed it on our Linux server.
Our kernel is:
$ rpm -qa | grep kernel
kernel-2.6.9-34.EL
kernel-smp-2.6.9-34.0.1.EL
kernel-smp-2.6.9-34.EL
kernel-utils-2.4-13.1.80
I got errors when trying to load ocfs2:
[root@db-red4-srv01 oracle]# /etc/init.d/o2cb status
Module "configfs": Not loaded
Filesystem "configfs": Not mounted
Module "ocfs2_nodemanager": Not loaded
Module "ocfs2_dlm": Not loaded
Module "ocfs2_dlmfs": Not loaded
Filesystem "ocfs2_dlmfs": Not mounted
[root@db-red4-srv01 oracle]# /etc/init.d/o2cb load
Loading module "configfs": Unable to load module "configfs"
Failed
[root@db-red4-srv01 oracle]# /etc/init.d/o2cb online ocfs2
Loading module "configfs": Unable to load module "configfs"
Failed
Also when trying to configure the nodes using ocfs2console, I get the following error:
#ocfs2console
-> cluster
-> configure nodes
Could not start cluster stack. This must be resolved
before any ocfs2 fileysystem can be mounted.
Anyone has an idea?

Hello Jiang
I am facing the same error while installing ocfs2 on RHEL4 and here is last 20 lines from my dmesg,
device-mapper: dm-multipath version 1.0.5 loaded
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on sda1, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
Adding 1736696k swap on /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01. Priority:-1 extents:1
parport0: PC-style at 0x378 [PCSPP,TRISTATE]
ip_tables: (C) 2000-2002 Netfilter core team
ip_tables: (C) 2000-2002 Netfilter core team
ip_tables: (C) 2000-2002 Netfilter core team
configfs: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
i2c /dev entries driver
eth0: no IPv6 routers present
eth1: no IPv6 routers present
Hangcheck: starting hangcheck timer 0.9.0 (tick is 30 seconds, margin is 180 seconds).
Hangcheck: Using get_cycles().
mtrr: your processor doesn't support write-combining
configfs: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
configfs: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
configfs: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
configfs: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
Following is the output of ocfs2 packages installed.
uname -r
2.6.9-89.ELsmp
#rpm -qa --qf "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}_%{ARCH}
n" |grep ocfs2
nocfs2console-1.2.7-1.el4_i386
nocfs2-tools-1.2.7-1.el4_i386
nocfs2-2.6.9-89.EL-1.2.9-1.el4_i686
nocfs2-2.6.9-89.ELsmp-1.2.9-1.el4_i686
Appreciate if anyone could help me.
Thanks,
Anil

Linux RedHat 4 update 4: how to unbind raw devices used by ASM diskgroups?

How to unbind raw devices used by ASM diskgroup?
I created ASM diskgroup using /dev/raw/rawn, after done my testing, I need to toss the raw devices to start a new testing. Here is the procedure:
1. shutdown MYTEST database
2. in ASM instance, remove disks from diskgroup 'rawtest'
3. in ASM instance, "drop diskgroup rawtest including contents"
4. in OS, issue: "raw /dev/raw/raw1 0 0"
I got the following error:
# raw /dev/raw/raw1 0 0
Error setting raw device (Device or resource busy)
But if I shutdown ASM instance, the above commmand will be successful.
My question, how can I unbind raw devices without shutting down ASM instance(could be used by other databases at the same time)?
Thanks,
Jenny

The installation guild will probably be were you will want to start.
2.11 Preparing Disk Groups for an Automatic Storage Management Installation
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/install.102/b15660/pre_install.htm#sthref457
Specifically
2.12 Configuring Raw Partitions or Raw Logical Volumes
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/install.102/b15660/pre_install.htm#sthref591

Re: Is Oracle 11gR2 and 10gR2 BOTH compatible with Oracle Linux 6 Update 1?

Hello,
Required to Install Oracle 11gR2 and 10gR2 Oracle binaries on Oracle Linux 6 Update 1, are both versions compatible to install and run with databases on Oracle Linux Release 6 Update 1 or Oracle Linux Release 5 Update 7 is required for this?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
A
Edited by: 850391 on Oct 13, 2011 3:43 PM
Edited by: 850391 on Oct 13, 2011 3:44 PM
Edited by: 850391 on Oct 13, 2011 3:44 PM

Hi;
Oracle 11g or 10g is not certified wiht OEL or RHEH6 yet. Please use OEL 5.x version which you can download from edelivery.
Also see:
Oracle Database on Unix AIX,HP-UX,Linux,Mac OS X,Solaris,Tru64 Unix Operating Systems Installation and Configuration Requirements Quick Reference (8.0.5 to 11.2) [ID 169706.1]
Regard
Helios

Linux RHES 4 update 3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for