List BOM till 2nd level

Dear All,
I'm trying to create a query in SQVI - my aim is to list BOM till the second level.
parent part component1 component2
A________B_________D
A________B_________E
A________C_________-
Inserting MAST-STKO-sTPO + MAST_2-STKO_2-STPO_2 will not list parts like component 'C' (i.e. parts that have no BOM).
If you have any idea, please...
thx

Now i have understood your requirement.
There is standard report (transaction CSMB)...in this obe give the selection criteria " Max explosion level" as per your requirement for a multilevel BOM.
This report will display the BOM upto the selected level.
If you want to develop Z report with using SQVI the you can use the reference of this CSMB report (BOM browser).
WIth BOM explosion number you can limit the explosion to the assemblies..not to the material level.
Please let me know if you any question.
Regards
TAJUDDIN

Similar Messages

Leave request is not coming in 2nd level approval in MSS NWBC

Hi all,
I am getting the leave request for 2nd level approval in MSS work item.
But I want that in MSS Leave approval () .
Is there any configuration to do for this.?

I am getting the leave request for 2nd level approval in MSS work item ?
your getting leave request in POWL Application i.e Bulk approval list. This is correct only.
But I want that in MSS Leave approval () . ?
Can you explain little more clear.

TOC - First level appearing after 1st instance of 2nd level

Is there a known issue or paragraph style conflict that might cause the first level title to appear after the first instance (same page#) of the 2nd level in the table of contents?
for example, chapter one page 1 should appear first in this list but does not:
Chapter 1 Intro..............Page 1
Subtopic1 Chapter 1........Page 1
CHAPTER 1......................Page 1 (this should appear first in list)
Subtopic2 Chapter 1........Page 2
Subtopic3 Chapter 1........Page 3
Chapter 2 Intro..............Page 4
CHAPTER 2......................Page 4 (this should appear before Ch2Intro)
Subtopic1 Chapter 2........Page 5
It appears the page number being the same across multiple levels is causing some confusion. I am not sure if this is a style set up for the top level style. ??

Hi Lara,
When TOC paragraphs are not all in the same story, InDesign can become confused about the order of the paragraphs on a given page. It looks to me as if "CHAPTER 1" and "Chaper 1 Intro" are in different stories. The easiest way to get them into the correct order in the TOC is to link the two stories, with "Chapter 1 Intro" following "CHAPTER 1" in that story.
Thanks,
Ole

Coherence as a hibernate 2nd level cache

Hello,
I'm trying to use Coherence as a hibernate 2nd level cache but I'm getting the following exception when there are hundreds of concurrent DB transactions.
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Exceeded maximum number of waiting threads (Status=1)
at com.tangosol.net.cache.OverflowMap$Status.waitForAvailable(OverflowMap.java:4029)
at com.tangosol.net.cache.OverflowMap.prepareStatus(OverflowMap.java:2152)
at com.tangosol.net.cache.OverflowMap.beginKeyProcess(OverflowMap.java:1873)
at com.tangosol.net.cache.OverflowMap.getInternal(OverflowMap.java:580)
at com.tangosol.net.cache.OverflowMap.get(OverflowMap.java:330)
at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.CacheHandler.getLease(CacheHandler.CDB:3)
at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.CacheHandler.ensureLease(CacheHandler.CDB:4)
at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.ReplicatedCache.updateResource(ReplicatedCache.CDB:18)
at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.CacheHandler.put(CacheHandler.CDB:11)
at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.CacheHandler.putAll(CacheHandler.CDB:8)
at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.SafeNamedCache.putAll(SafeNamedCache.CDB:1)
at com.tangosol.coherence.hibernate.CoherenceCache.put(CoherenceCache.java:90)
at org.hibernate.cache.impl.bridge.BaseGeneralDataRegionAdapter.put(BaseGeneralDataRegionAdapter.java:48)
at org.hibernate.cache.UpdateTimestampsCache.preinvalidate(UpdateTimestampsCache.java:70)
Anyone have any ideas?
The timestamps cache has the default replicated cache scheme.
Thanks,
Ivelin

Hello,
Actually it's happening during read from a replicated cache too.
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Exceeded maximum number of waiting threads (Status=1)
at com.tangosol.net.cache.OverflowMap$Status.waitForAvailable(OverflowMap.java:4029)
at com.tangosol.net.cache.OverflowMap.prepareStatus(OverflowMap.java:2152)
at com.tangosol.net.cache.OverflowMap.beginKeyProcess(OverflowMap.java:1873)
at com.tangosol.net.cache.OverflowMap.getInternal(OverflowMap.java:580)
at com.tangosol.net.cache.OverflowMap.get(OverflowMap.java:330)
at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.CacheHandler.getLease(CacheHandler.CDB:3)
at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.CacheHandler.getCachedResource(CacheHandler.CDB:10)
at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.CacheHandler.get(CacheHandler.CDB:1)
at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.SafeNamedCache.get(SafeNamedCache.CDB:1)
at com.tangosol.coherence.hibernate.CoherenceCache.get(CoherenceCache.java:65)
at org.hibernate.cache.impl.bridge.BaseGeneralDataRegionAdapter.get(BaseGeneralDataRegionAdapter.java:44)
at org.hibernate.cache.StandardQueryCache.get(StandardQueryCache.java:130)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.getResultFromQueryCache(Loader.java:2188)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.listUsingQueryCache(Loader.java:2151)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.list(Loader.java:2121)
at org.hibernate.loader.criteria.CriteriaLoader.list(CriteriaLoader.java:118)
at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.list(SessionImpl.java:1597)
at org.hibernate.impl.CriteriaImpl.list(CriteriaImpl.java:306)
at org.hibernate.impl.CriteriaImpl.uniqueResult(CriteriaImpl.java:328)
There must be a configuration option to control the number of waiting threads, right?
I guess it's not a hardcoded constant.
The statistics of the cache we are reading from are:
0.99 hit probability
550 303 gets
1469 puts
Size: 1270This is for 5 mins period.
This cache holds the configuration of the application, so there are almost no writes.
Thanks,
Ivelin

Link between Delivery Header & Sales Order Item for extraction to 2nd level

Hi Guys ,
I am having a requirement that need to pull the following data to 2nd level DSO
1. Delivery Header Data
2. Sales Order Item data. ( Sales Document, Item, Item RDD, Material)
So I am planning create a 2nd level DSO on top of Delivery header and need to pull the sales order ITEM level data ( Sales document , Order ITEM, ITEM RDD date , Material) through start routine u2026
How can I pull the Sales Order Item data through start routine? i.e I need the link between Delivery Header & Sales Order Item Data .
or I need the link between LIKP ( Delivery Header) Vs VBAP ( Sales Document Item).
Thanks
Edited by: krismady on Sep 22, 2010 2:26 AM
or I need the link between LIKP ( Delivery Header) Vs VBAP ( Sales Document Item).

Hi Krish,
You can use VBLEN (Sales Document) to link Delivery header DS (2LIS_12_VCHDR) and Delivery item DS (2LIS_12_VCITM). Now In delivery item DS (2LIS_12_VCITM) you have VGBEL (Reference doc.) and VGPOS (Reference item) which is nothing but sales order document number and sales item in Order item DS (2LIS_11_VAITM) .
So you need to link in above way to get other values in your DSO.
It is proven method.
Thanks,
Uday Shankar.

Dunning - 2nd level dunning is not working

Hello Experts
I have received a requirement from client for configuration of two level dunning (ie 14 & 35 days). I did the following configuration
(a) Defined the Dunning Area
(b) Defined the Dunning procedure in the following manner:
Dunning Interval in days - 1
No. of Dunning Levels - 2
Total Due items for Dunning - 0
Minimum Days arreas - 14
Line Item grace period - 14
Selected -> Standard transaction dunning
Under Dunning Level Tab
Days in Arrears - 14 & 35
We are not using interest & no penality charges.
Assigned the Dunning Test with the following combination
Letter 1 u2013
W_MHND-BUKRS = Company Name
W_MHND-MAHNN = 1
W_MHND_SMABER = Dunning Area
W_MHNK-MAHNA = u2018Dunning Procedureu2019
Letter 2 u2013
W_MHND-BUKRS = Company Name
W_MHND-MAHNN = 2
W_MHND_SMABER = Dunning Area
W_MHNK-MAHNA = u2018Dunning Procedureu2019
(c) Maintained the Dunning Area in customer master data -> Company code data -> Correspondance
(d) I have posted the sales invoice with posting date and due date as 01.03.2011.
While carrying the dunning activtity through T.Code F150 (I did the 1st level run with dunning date as 22.03.2011 ) -> All the activities are going smothly like Dunning selection completed, Dunning Print out completed and Sample Printout is completed for the 1st level
The second level dunning is carried on 26.04.2011 as dunning date. However, after completion of selection perameters. the system is showing as Dunning Selection is completed bu the system log says as follows:
Date        Time               Message
26.04.2011 15:34:12    Job started
26.04.2011 15:34:12    Step 001 started (program SAPF150S2, variant &0000000000523, user ID AMUNNALURI)
26.04.2011 15:34:12     ******************   Log for dunning run 20110430 / TEST1 ****************
26.04.2011 15:34:13     =========================================================================
26.04.2011 15:34:13    > Account D 0000000061, company code SC01 is being processed
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >            Reading account data and document information    Phase 0
26.04.2011 15:34:13    > Account D 0000000061 has a payment method for incoming payments
26.04.2011 15:34:13    > Account D 0000000061 read items: 11
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >             Processing and completing dunning lines         Phase I
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 0090000052/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Document 0090000380/2008/001 has new dunning level 1.
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 0090000381/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 0090000384/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 0090000387/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 0090000614/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 1400000052/2008/002 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Doc. 1800000012/2008/001 has payment method for incoming payments, no dun.notice
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Document 0064000433/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Document 0064000437/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >   Document 0064000438/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >           Check legal dunning procedure and credit memos     Phase II -
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >           Minimum charges and dunning interest             Phase III
26.04.2011 15:34:13    >             Generate dunning data                           Phase IV
26.04.2011 15:34:14    Job finished
If i continue the Dunning Print & Sample Print out.. the system is showing the following logs
Date        Time      Message
26.04.2011 15:35:31     Job started
26.04.2011 15:35:31     Step 001 started (program SAPF150D2, variant &0000000000344, user ID AMUNNALURI)
26.04.2011 15:35:31     >        Start print phase
26.04.2011 15:35:31               0 dunning notices were read
26.04.2011 15:35:31               0 dunning notices have been printed
26.04.2011 15:35:31    End dunning printout 30.04.11 / TEST1
26.04.2011 15:35:31    Job finished
Kindly let me know, did i missed any steps in the configuration??
Regards
Anil

Hello Renan
Thanks for your reply, I am finding difference during 1st run and 2nd level run during selection perameters in the following area.
(Note that, we are not using the Interest / charges)
During 1st level dunning the system is showing as Dunning Level Log under Phase II, Phase III, Phase IV document no.
26.04.2011 15:30:38    >           Check legal dunning procedure and credit memos     Phase II -
26.04.2011 15:30:38    >           Minimum charges and dunning interest             Phase III
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Interest indicator 0N and currency GBP are missing in T056Z
26.04.2011 15:30:38    >             Generate dunning data                           Phase IV
26.04.2011 15:30:38    >
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Account D 0000000061 dunning notice/dun.area. Dunning area 58 is being processed.
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Account D 0000000061 dunning notice/dun.level. Dunning level 1 is being processed.
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Account D 0000000061 uses dunning procedure DG3
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Dunning level D 0000000061 is used for account 1
26.04.2011 15:30:38    >   Document 0064000438/2010/001: Dunning level 1, days in arrears 20, status <.Dpi>
26.04.2011 15:30:38    > Account D 0000000061 dunning data has been generated.
26.04.2011 15:30:39    Job finished
Where as for 2nd level dunning the system is showing under Dunning Level Log is as follows:
26.04.2011 15:34:13   > Document 0064000438/2010/001 has new dunning level 2.
26.04.2011 15:34:13   > Check legal dunning procedure and credit memos Phase II -
26.04.2011 15:34:13   > Minimum charges and dunning interest Phase III
26.04.2011 15:34:13   > Generate dunning data Phase IV
26.04.2011 15:34:14   Job finished
Due to this, i am presumed that some more configuration has been missed at my end.
Kindly revert with your observations in the above log
Regards
Anil

Problem reading document part list (BOM)

Hello!
I am using FM 'CSAP_DOC_BOM_CREATE' to create a document part list (BOM), which works fine. But i have difficulties to read the Doc-BOM (using FM 'CSAP_DOC_BOM_READ' or 'CS_BOM_EXPL_DOC_V1'):
-> the result-tables t_stpo (FM 'CSAP_DOC_BOM_READ' ) and stb (FM 'CS_BOM_EXPL_DOC_V1') do not contain the complete document number (type doknr), which means that e.g. leading 0 are missing. The DB-table STPO also not contains the complete document number! I need the complete document number to read further document details from draw.
Does somebody have any advice? Thank you in advance!
greetings
Wolfgang

There's a function module that takes care of that. Just search for it in SE37 (something like CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA... ).
edit: CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT
Edited by: Maen Anachronos on Sep 25, 2008 4:46 PM

Adding alternate component in the same BOM for 2 level BOM setup

Hello,
I have a BOM with the following setups -
BOM_A components are BOM_B, Comp_A1, Comp_A2
BOM_B components are Comp_B1, Comp_B2
The need is to have an a BOM with components Comp_B1, Comp_B2, Comp_C1. if I create this as an Alt of BOM_B, how can I use this alternate in BOM_A?
Can anyone please let me know if there is a way to specify the alternate of BOM components in multi level BOM?
Regards,
Manju

Hello Manju,
Can you please specify the exact business requirement.
Why this is required at BOM Level?
If BOM_B (comp_B1,comp_B2 & comp_C1) is Alt. bom & WIP job completed using this Alt. BOM then syste will take care / consider valuation as per Alt. BOM for first level bom (BOM_A) WIP job.
Thanks
NS

2nd level of Drill Down

Hello,
I am making the Drill Down configuration.
1st Level is
- Area
2nd Level is
-Branch
3rd Level is
-Shops
After I make above configuration, I test this on the BI Answers.
ex)
Area
New York
Tokyo
Paris
1. I click the column "Tokyo".
2. Then the report will show like this
Area 　　Branch
Tokyo　　Asakusa
　　　　　　Ginza
and I can click "Tokyo","Asakusa" and "Ginza".
But at this point, I don't want to let users click the "Tokyo" column , but only "Asakusa" and "Ginza" columns.
Is it possible by the configuration of the BIEE Repository or Answers ??

Hi,
I dont think so it is possible.
But If you click "tokyo" only you can see "Asakusa" and "Ginza".How would you stop user to not click tokyo if you want to get to other step to "branches".
If you want to achieve that directly create a dimension for Branch and shops.So user will see branches and shops and make it as a separate sheet for that specific user and give him permissions.
Hope it helps you.
By,
Kranthi.

Bom Explosion first level, if first level having phanthom it has to explode

Dear All,
Kindly tell any function module is available for BOM explosion first level.
if first level having any sub assembly part, bom not to explode below level.
if first level having any phanthom material, it has to explode below level, in this phanthom material having any below phanthom material part of bom, it also explode below level.
it means only phanthom material has explode below level, no sub assembly part.
If any functional module is available for this bom explosion.
i tried functional module - CS_BOM_EXPL_MAT_V2, but if i put "X" in field - MEHRS, sub assembly part also exploding below level.
kindly help on this.
Regards,
sakthi

Hi,
i tried functional module - CS_BOM_EXPL_MAT_V2, but if i put "X" in field - MEHRS, sub assembly part also exploding below level.
Ans: Do not set this MEHRS indicator. This will explode the BOM to first level.
Then add another loop on first level materials to check if any of them is phantom and explode the phantoms using same FM module in a loop. Follow this until all are done.
Regards,
Santosh Sarda

BOM at delivery level

Hi all,
I have an issue. Is it possible to explode the BOM at delivery level with getting it exploded at sales order level?
Sudha

not get nay response.
Thanks

Just I want to know What is 1st level & 2nd level support

At client place on shore in production support project in as What is 1st level & 2nd level support?
and Nature of work
Thanks in advance
Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:34 PM
Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:37 PM

I would still defend myself saying that this has already been answered...
I just did a search on SDN and found a post that would answer your question....
Re: Help desk& rollup
you are looking at L1 and L2 support....
The thread was locked because the question is already answered ( or discussed about ) in another post and you can get your answers faster by just searching....
Also if you do find the answers fetched as not being correct or accurate enough - you would need to mention that you did search the forums before posting. This way questions which have already been answered are not brought up again and it ends up with others doing the searching for you which paints a wrong picture...
Also in some cases L1 teams are merged with the company's existing L1 support desk to avoid confusion but follow similar rules as mentioned in the link and simlarly L2 - when you have multiple systems being supported by a central support team you get such scenarios where L1 and L2 are on-shore.
My 0.02
Arun Varadarajan
P.S I am removing the reference to my name in the title... and BTW the search took me less than 2 minutes ... which is why we want people to use the search functionality more than raising duplicate posts....
Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:35 PM
Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Feb 5, 2009 2:36 PM

Maintaining attributes, data source and attribute list in web UI level.

Hi
Can we maintain attributes, data source and attribute list in web UI level. We can do it in SAP GUI level but do we have the option of doing it on web UI level??
Regards
Aakshi

Hi Aakshi,
As far as I know,data sources and Attribute lists need to be maintained in GUI but these can further be used for Segmentation in Web UI using the Graphical Modeler.
If you need more assistance please do revert.
Regards
Varun Taneja

2nd Level Dunning Problem

Hello Experts
I have configured the two level dunning procedure. Configuration settings are as follows:
(a) Defined the Dunning Area
(b) Defined the Dunning procedure in the following manner:
Dunning Interval in days - 1
No. of Dunning Levels - 2
Total Due items for Dunning - 0
Minimum Days arreas - 14
Line Item grace period - 14
Selected -> Standard transaction dunning
Under Dunning Level Tab
Days in Arrears - 14 & 35
We are not using interest & no penality charges.
Assigned the Dunning Test with the following combination
Observations during Testing :-
(1) Customer sales invoice posted on 01.03.2011 and due date is 01.03.2011
(2) 1st level dunning carried on 21.03.2011 and dunning run and print out is success
(3) 2nd level dunning carried on 30.04.2011 .... here the system is showing the dunning run log
     Document number XXXXXX (same document what i have posted on 01.03.2011) has now dunning level 2
     But the system is (a) Not checked the Dunning notice / dunning area for customer
                                   (b) Not checked the Dunning procedure
                                    but shown as job finished
    If i continue the print out option - the sytem is showing 0 dunning notices are read & not customer dunning history updated
Kindly let me did i missed any configuration ? Altenatvely if i want to do the debug with the help of ABAP.. in which program i need to maintain the Break point
Kindly revert
Regards
Anil

Hi
Did the dunning run on suggested date.. but unfortunately the result is the same
Regards
Anil

How to restrict from creating the Network for 1st & 2nd level WBS

Hi All,
In our project structure we have up to 5 levels of WBS, In some cases we have creates 3 level also . Now we want to restrict creates Network for first two level WBS , actually we want to restrict user to Create PR for those WBS so if we restrict them from creation of Network for 1st & 2nd level then they not able to create PR for same .
Thanks,
Virendra

Hi Virendra,
I can suggest you other way round solution.
If you are sure that those two WBS will not take any actual or commitment cost, then its better to NOT to mark those WBS elements as Account Assignment Element. I mean, if you do not set the indicator of Acct. Assignment Element (Untick Acct Assignment Element) on those WBS, then user will not be able to create Networks on those WBS Elements. Try this on your development or quality client and let me know if it works.
If it works, then you just need to disabled the Acct. Assignment Element indicator for those two WBS element and you can achieve that through substitution and field selection of WBS as well.
OR
Just look at OPSG settings at tab component. Just look if that can solve your purpose because your requirement is to stop PR from those WBS element. (I am just wondering if you can stop user from creating/change material components from those WBS-Networks)
OR
Go for User Status and set it to on those WBS Elements. Object Types will be Networks and Network Header.
OR
Try to achieve a validation or substitution where in you can mark Res./Pur. Req as 1 (Never) only for those two WBS elements. In this way user cannot create PR on those two WBS elements.
Regards,
Amit

List BOM till 2nd level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for