Live Migration - Failed to establish a connection because of an unsupported protocol version (protocol version 5.0)

I'm getting a not the disk and everything) back to the host I originally had it on. Here is my setup:
Host 1 - Microsoft Storage Server 2012 Standard (NAS)
Host 2 - Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2012 (All connected virtual hard drives use the SMB 3.0 protocol to connect to the NAS - Host 1)
Delegation is setup on both of these hosts to include:
-Trust this computer, Use Kerberos only, Services - cifs, Hyper-V Replication, Microsoft Virtual Console Service, Microsoft Virtual System Migration Service
Live Migration is setup on both of these hosts to include:
-Enable incoming and outgoing live migrations using Kerberos
-Use any available network for live migration
I was able to migrate the VM from host 1 to host 2 with no problems. But when I try to migrate the VM host 1 that's when I encounter the error.
I saw a KB article similar to the issue I'm having but it only effects Server 2008 R2 (KB2705759)
I've rebooted both hosts but still get the error. The VM that is on host 2 has it's hard drive on host 1 run's fine so there are no connection issues there.
I've searched the Internet for this issue and keep coming up empty handed. I even named the virtual switch on both hosts the same to see if that would work. Please help! I'd rather not do an export and import of the VM because I'm evaluating
this product so I want to make sure it works before I put it into production.

Hi PPlbrad,
Agree with Shabarinath .
We can just live migration the VM from low version (2012) to high version (2012R2) but the reverse is not ture .
So do hyper-v replica (just for updating )
Best Regards
Elton JI
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Similar Messages

Live Migration failed using virtual HBA's and Guest Clustering

Hi,
We have a Guest Cluster Configuration on top of an Hyper-V Cluster. We are using Windows 2012 and Fiber Channel shared storage.
The problem is regarding Live Migration. Some times when we move a virtual machine from node A to node B everything goes well but when we try to move back to node A Live Migration fails. What we can see is that when we move the VM from node A to B and Live
Migration completes successfully the virtual ports remain active on node A, so when we try to move back from B to A Live Migration fails because the virtual ports are already there.
This doesn't happen every time.
We have checked the zoning between Host Cluster Hyper-V and the SAN, the mapping between physical HBA's and the vSAN's on the Hyper-V and everything is ok.
Our doubt is, what is the best practice for zoning the vHBA on the VM's and our Fabric? We setup our zoning using an alias for the vHBA 1 and the two WWN (A and B) on the same object and an alias for the vHBA 2 and the correspondent WWN (A and B). Is it
better to create an alias for vHBA 1 -> A (with WWN A) and other alias for vHBA 1 -> B (with WWN B)?
The guest cluster VM's have 98GB of RAM each. Could it be a time out issue when Live Migration happen's and the virtual ports remain active on the source node? When everything goes well, the VM moves from node A with vHBA WWN A to node B and stays there
with vHBA WWN B. On the source node the virtual ports should be removed automatically when the Live Migration completes. And that is the issue... sometimes the virtual ports (WWN A) stay active on the source node and when we try to move back the VM Live Migration
fails.
I hope You may understand the issue.
Regards,
Carlos Monteiro.

Hi ,
Hope the following link may help.
To support live migration of virtual machines across Hyper-V hosts while maintaining Fibre Channel connectivity, two WWNs are configured for each virtual Fibre Channel adapter: Set A and Set B. Hyper-V automatically alternates between the Set A and Set B
WWN addresses during a live migration. This ensures that all LUNs are available on the destination host before the migration and that no downtime occurs during the migration.
Hyper-V Virtual Fibre Channel Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831413.aspx
More information:
Hyper-V Virtual Fibre Channel Troubleshooting Guide
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/18698.hyper-v-virtual-fibre-channel-troubleshooting-guide.aspx
Hyper-V Virtual Fibre Channel Design Guide
http://blogs.technet.com/b/privatecloud/archive/2013/07/23/hyper-v-virtual-fibre-channel-design-guide.aspx
Hyper-V virtual SAN
http://salworx.blogspot.co.uk/
Thanks.
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

TELNET: Failed to establish TELNET connection

Hi,
I've launched a NetShow job against several routers. The job result is successful but appears the following message:
Deploy successful (TELNET: Failed to establish TELNET connection to 10.253.49.34 - Cause: Authentication failed on device 3 times. Primary Login Succeeded / Primary Enable Succeeded )
We have only access by ssh to the routers, no telnet is configured, so that message is OK. But, how could I configure CW to try only ssh connection mode to routers? Swiches use telnet instead of ssh...so I should configure only telnet as connection mode...
Thanks in advance.

You can set the protocol order for Configuration Management applications such as Archive Management, Config Editor, and NetConfig jobs to download configurations and to fetch configurations. For NetShow, you can set the protocol order to download configurations.
You havent mentioned the LMS version as path to this feature would differ. I will provide navigation link for both lms 3 and 4.
LMS 3.x :
CiscoWorks LMS Portal > RME > Admin > Config Mgmt > Transport Settings
LMS 4.x :
Admin > Collection Settings: Config > Config Transport Settings
-Thanks

Reason 421: Failed to establish a connection with your ISP

I have an excelent connection to the internet, and i try with diferent version of cisco vpn client, I have windows vista, but the cisco vpn client sen me this message: Reason 421: Failed to establish a connection with your ISP, when i try to make a vpn connection.

Hi men thanks for your help i found the problem it was configure for a dial up connection and Im using ADSL connection.

BAM Connection in 12C - Failed to establish a connection to localhost at port 7004.Please verify the Bam server host and JNDI port.

Hi,
BAM server is running on 7004 in our local system.
We need o connect to BAM server from OSB service.
We tried to use the BAM adapter in the pipeline in 12c, We received Failed to establish a connection to localhost at port 7004.Please verify the Bam server host and JNDI port.
Please let us know the resolution to this issue.
Also please provide some links/steps to connect from OSB service to BAM server in 12c.
Thanks,

In BAM 12c, you can send data via JMS by configuring an EMS in BAM using the "self-described" payload. Make sure the date formats match correctly. You can configure an error queue which will show you any data parsing problems.
For example,
<msgRoot dataObjectName="Student" operationType="insert" keys="RequestId">
   <RequestId>R1000</RequestId>
   <StudentId>S12345</StudentId>
   <RequestType>Admission</RequestType>
   <RequestStatus>Open</RequestStatus>
   <RequestMessage>Please Admin</RequestMessage>
   <RequestCode>3</RequestCode>
   <SubmitTime>2015-03-17 18:23:07</SubmitTime>
   <ApprovalTime>2015-02-18 18:23:07</ApprovalTime>
</msgRoot>

Live Migration Failed After Yum Update on 2.2.2

Hi,
I've live migrated vm's from node2 to node1 (master server). Put node2 into maintenance mode, then reconfigure ntp.conf to sync with our new ntp server. While in maintenance mode, I've also ran yum update which updated the kernel from 2.6.18-128.2.1.4.37.el5xen to 2.6.18-128.2.1.4.44.el5xen. In the process, xen was also updated from 3.4.0-0.1.32.el5 to 3.4.0-0.1.39.el5.
After rebooting, I've put node2 back into active mode. But now I can't live migrate the vm's back into node 2. From node1, ovs_operations.log:
"2012-06-23 11:03:28" INFO=> migrate_vm: vm('/OVS/running_pool/1210_vm05') start...
"2012-06-23 11:03:29" INFO=> xen_migrate_vm: migrate with ssl enabled failed, do failover(no ssl). vm('/var/ovs/mount/54DA5753709A48B3BFAEE65C2EAECCE0/running_pool/1210_vm05') -> tgt_srv('node2')
"2012-06-23 11:03:30" ERROR=> xen_migrate_vm: failed. vm('/var/ovs/mount/54DA5753709A48B3BFAEE65C2EAECCE0/running_pool/1210_vm05') -> tgt_srv('node2') =><Exception: xen_migrate_vm: migrate without ssl failed either.>
From node2 ovs_operations.log:
"2012-06-23 11:03:30" INFO=> ha_join_dlm_domain: =>success
"2012-06-23 11:03:30" ERROR=> ha_set_dlm_lock:failed. lock('6f1cb211-ecef-4ac6-af2b-091fc6fd5966') name('1210_vm05')=> <Exception: create lock('/dlm/ovm/f1cb211ecef4ac6af2b091fc6fd5966') failed. <OSError: [Errno 26] Text file busy: '/dlm/ovm/f1cb211ecef4ac6af2b091fc6fd5966'>
Is this due to the different xen versions after the update? How can I live migrate the vm's back to node2 so that I can take node1 into maintenance mode to reconfigure ntp.conf and run yum update?
Thanks!

The next thing to try is to work though the steps in [[Error loading web sites]]. Though if this is happening on all of your computers it might have something to do with your internet connection. Maybe resetting that will help.

Hyper-V live migration failed

There is Hyper-V cluster with 2 nodes. Windows Server 2012 R2 is used as operating system.
Trying to live migrate test VM from node 1 to node 2 and get error 21502:
Live migration of 'Virtual Machine test' failed.
'Virtual Machine test' failed to fixup network settings. Verify VM settings and update them as necessary.
VM has Network Adapter connected to Virtual switch. This vSwitch has Private network as connection type.
If I set virtual switch property to "Not connected" in Network Adapter settings of VM I get successful migration.
All VM's that are not connected to any private networks (virtual switches with private network connection type) can be live migrated without any issues.
Is there any official reference related to Hyper-V live migration of VM's that have "private network" connection type?

I can Live Migrate virtual machines with adapters on private switches without error. Aside from having the wrong name, the only way I can get it to fail is if I make the switch on one host use a different QoS minimum mode than the other and
enable QoS on the virtual adapter. Even then I get a different message than what you're getting. I only get that one with differently named switches.
There is a PowerShell cmdlet available to see why a guest won't run on another host.
Here's an example of its usage.
There's a way to use it to get it to Live Migrate.
But there is no way to truly Live Migrate three virtual machines in perfect lockstep. Even if you figure out whatever is preventing you from migrating these machines, there will still be periods during Live Migration where they can't communicate across that
private network. You also can't guarantee that all these guests will always be running on the same host without preventing Live Migration in the first place. This is why there really isn't anyone doing what you're trying to do. I suggest you consider another
isolation solution, like VLANs.
Eric Siron Altaro Hyper-V Blog
I am an independent blog contributor, not an Altaro employee. I am solely responsible for the content of my posts.
"Every relationship you have is in worse shape than you think."

Live Migration Failed while Quick Migration is Ok...Virtual machine with synthetic FC HBA !

When I migration the virtual machine with synthetic FC HBA in windows server 2012 R2 Cluster,it fails
but I do it in the style of quick migraton ,it secceed!
The error event here
Live migration of 'Virtual Machine PTSCSQL01' failed.
Virtual machine migration operation for 'PTSCSQL01' failed at migration destination 'PTCLS0106'. (Virtual machine ID B8FBDE64-FF97-4E9B-BC40-6DCFA09B31BE)
'PTSCSQL01' Synthetic FibreChannel Port: Failed to finish reserving resources with Error 'Unspecified error' (0x80004005). (Virtual machine ID B8FBDE64-FF97-4E9B-BC40-6DCFA09B31BE)
'PTSCSQL01' Synthetic FibreChannel Port: Failed to finish reserving resources with Error 'Unspecified error' (0x80004005). (Virtual machine ID B8FBDE64-FF97-4E9B-BC40-6DCFA09B31BE)
My virtual machine's synthetic FC HBA setting here
做微软的先行者，享受用户体验

Yes, definitely check your zoning/masking. Remember that with vHBA you have twice as many WWPNs to account for. Performing a live migration makes use of both pairs during the transfer from one host to the other - one set is active on the machine
currently running and the second set is used to ensure connectivity on the destination. So if you are using Address Set A on Host1, Host2 will try to set up the fibre channel connection using Address Set B. If you do a quick migration, you would
continue to use the same Address Set on the second host. That's why you most likely need to check your zoning/masking for the alternate set.
. : | : . : | : . tim

Server 2012 r2 live migration fails with hardware error

Hello all, we just upgraded one of our hyper v hosts from server 2012 to server 2012 r2; previously we had live replication setup between it and another box on the network which was also running server 2012. After installing server 2012 r2 when a live migration
is attempted we get the message:
"The virtual machine cannot be moved to the destination computer. The hardware on the destination computer is not compatible with the hardware requirements of this virtual machine. Virtual machine migration failed at migration source."
The servers in question are both dell, currently we have a poweredge r910 running server 2012 and a poweredge r900 running server 2012 r2. The section under processor for "migrate to a physical computer using a different processor" is already checked
and this same vm was successfully being live replicated before the upgrade to server 2012 r2. What would have changed around hardware requirements?
We are migrating from server 2012 on the poweredge r910 to server 2012 r2 on the poweredge r900. Also When I say this was an upgrade, we did a full re install and wiped out the installation of server 2012 and installed server 2012 r2, this was not an upgrade
installation.

The only cause I’ve seen so far is virtual switches being named differently. I do remember that one of our VMs didn’t move, but we simply bypassed this problem, using one-time backup (VeeamZIP, more specifically).
If it’s one-time operation you can use the same procedure for the VMs in question -> backup and restore them at new server.
Kind regards, Leonardo.

Live Migration Fails with error Synthetic FiberChannel Port: Failed to finish reserving resources on an VM using Windows Server 2012 R2 Hyper-V

Hi, I'm currently experiencing a problem with some VMs in a Hyper-V 2012 R2 failover cluster using Fiber Channel adapters with Virtual SAN configured on the hyper-v hosts.
I have read several articles about this issues like this ones:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/baca348d-fb57-4d8f-978b-f1e7282f89a1/synthetic-fibrechannel-port-failed-to-start-reserving-resources-with-error-insufficient-system?forum=winserverhyperv
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/18698.hyper-v-virtual-fibre-channel-troubleshooting-guide.aspx
But haven't been able to fix my issue.
The Virtual SAN is configured on every hyper-v host node in the cluster. And every VM has 2 fiber channel adapters configured.
All the World Wide Names are configured both on the FC Switch as well as the FC SAN.
All the drivers for the FC Adapter in the Hyper-V Hosts have been updated to their latest versions.
The strange thing is that the issue is not affecting all of the VMs, some of the VMs with FC adapters configured are live migrating just fine, others are getting this error.
Quick migration works without problems.
We even tried removing and creating new FC Adapters on a VM with problems, we had to configure the switch and SAN with the new WWN names and all, but ended up having the same problem.
At first we thought is was related to the hosts, but since some VMs do work live migrating with FC adapters we tried migrating them on every host, everything worked well.
My guess is that it has to be something related to the VMs itself but I haven't been able to figure out what is it.
Any ideas on how to solve this is deeply appreciated.
Thank you!
Eduardo Rojas

Hi Eduardo,
How are things going ?
Best Regards
Elton Ji
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

XE, Failed to establish a connection to the server at 127.0.0.1:8080.

hi ,
i am using XE .yesterday i have logout my application properly.but today in morning when i open my application through
Start :->Program :->Oracle Data base 10g express Edition :->Go To Data Base Home Page
Then it shows me Page Load Error
Failed to Connect
Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at 127.0.0.1:8080.
How can i remove this problem.
Manoj Kaushik

Hi,
Database is running and listener is up ?
Br,Jari
Edited by: jarola on Jun 17, 2010 1:04 PM
Also try search solution from XE forum
Oracle Database Express Edition (XE)

VM stays in Status Stopping after live migration failed/was canceled

I have a hyper-v Cluster running on Windows 2012 r2. I tried a live Migration from one node of Cluster to another node of the same Cluster. It got stuck by around 65% (if remembered correctly). After 45 minutes nothing has changed so I canceled the Job in
the Failover Cluster Manager. The VM went into a Status of "Stopping". After 5 hours it is still in Status "stopping". I haven't found any Information on why it got stuck on the 65% and have just found the error message that the Job got
canceled using Failover Cluster Manager events. But nothing saying why it stays in "Stopping" Status. Searched the Internet but I have Trouble finding anything related to the issue I see.
Any ideas?

Hi Saren90,
Please try to disable the process "vmwp.exe " corresponding to the VM in host's task manager.
Best Regards
Elton Ji
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Migration/Live Migration fails with shared storage (SMB), but not all the time

I have 2 Hyper-V Hosts using shared storage via SMB. I'm having intermittent issues with migrations failing. It'll either go through the motions of doing the whole move and fail and/or when I try to start it again I get the following:
I've done a lot of reading on this and have done various things that have been recommended. For each Hyper-V host I've setup delagation via Kerberos. ie. HV_Host1 has CIFS - HV_Host2; CIFS - SMB Server; MS Virtual System Migration Service - HV_Host2 and
vice versa.
On the actual SMB share on the Shared Storage server I added permissions to the folder for HV_Host1, HV_Host2, Storage Server, Domain Admins and my user account for full access.
In Group Policy, I've blocked Inheritance for the OU containing the Hyper-V hosts, though I have added some of the Group Policy's manually that I needed.
Last thing, I also added Domain Admins to the Local GP on each Host for "Log on as a Service" and "Impersonate a client after authentication" as shown in this thread: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/windowsserver/en-US/7e6b9b1b-e5b1-4e9e-a1f3-2ce72ea1e543/unable-to-migrate-create-vm-hyperv-cluster-2012-logon-failure-have-to-restart-the-hyperv
I get these failed migrations regardless if I start them on the actual Host or via the admin console from Win8.
At this point I'm not sure what else to check or the next step to take for this.

Hi Granite,
Please refer to following article to build hyper-v over SMB :
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj134187.aspx#BKMK_Step3
Best Regards
Elton Ji
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Bluetooth PAN (iPhone tethering) fails to establish network connection

I tried to connect my Macbook Pro to the internet using my iPhone's UMTS link. It work using the USB cable, but fails with Bluetooth. The behavior is strange:
a) The "Network" system preference shows "Bluetooth PAN - not connected" in the interface list
b) I click on connect (device is my iPhone)
c) the Bluetooth icon changes to gray with a dashed horizontal line (meaning "connected")
d) The interface "Bluetooth PAN" still shows "not connected" in the left column, but the right side shows a Disconnect button. Internet access does not work.
e) I can disconnect; the bluetooth icon reverts to its default shape.
Question: Why is there no IP connection when the link to the iPhone is established?

There is a bug, that requires to remove all other pairings with bluetooth devices before tethering will work.
http://forums.mactalk.com.au/31/67260-iphone-bluetooth-tethering-not-working.htm l#post923436

HT6207 Fails to establish VPN connection after Security Update 2014-002

I have successfully used a VPN service with Mac OS 10.7, 10,8 and 10.9. After an update with Security Update 2014-002 connection requests are directy rejected by the MacOS. When looking into the VPN-log, the same set of 4 messages is logged after each attempt:
publish_entry SCDSet() failed: Success!
publish_entry SCDSet() failed: Success!
Fatal signal 13
can't talk to PPPController : Broken pipe
Is there a known remedy?
/andersbl

The VPN connection to this specific servcie provider has worked for me with previous MacOS and with 10.9. It now fails and the only change to my Macs are that I loaded the Security Update 2014-002 in the of April. I checked by adding the exactly same VPN connection definition to a 10.6 Mac and connected from the same LAN. This succeeded. Thus I suspect the Security Update, or that there is some paramater that now needs to be defined/changed.

Live Migration - Failed to establish a connection because of an unsupported protocol version (protocol version 5.0)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for