LiveCycle Form does not render correctly in Acrobat X

Hi,
I created a form in LiveCycle that includes 3 pages, positioned and flowing subforms, text items and data fields, etc.  My document operates fine when I preview and test it in pdf format within LiveCycle.  However, when I open the document in Acrobat X and enter data into the form and save it and print it, it is still fine.  However, when I then go back into the form after I have saved data into it, to update it, the formatting is skewed.  It pushes data on top of data.....I have searched for the possible reason why and cannot find anything.  Can anyone help? 

Sure,
Here is the shot....as you can see, the first table is running over the top of the next question and the next three tables are pushed together .....   this part of the form is positioned in designer so should not even be moving. 
This form looks and operates beautifully in the initial previews.....

Similar Messages

  • Animated Gif Image does not render correctly on screen

    I have added animated gif image to the scene it does not render correctely.it shakes on the screen. plz give me any suggestion
    i use following code
    Image logo= new Image(getClass().getResourceAsStream("images/image.gif"));
    logoLabel.setGraphic(new ImageView(logo));

    Hello user,
    I think gif are rendered smoothly.
    Are you sure you are not making many object of same images everytime?
    Thanks.
    Narayan

  • .pdf does not render correctly

    Hello everyone:
    When creating a .pdf from a .html dreamweaver file it does not render properly. Headings go to the left and sidebar images do not display properly. Any ideas as to how to fix this. Using Adode Acrobat 8 Professional and Adobe Dreamweaver CS3. Many Thanks

    Take a screenshot of the page then convert that to a PDF.
    The PrtScr key on the keyboard only captures what you can see on screen (or the active window).
    To get the entire page, either use something like SnagIt (commercial) or use one of the free add-ons for Firefox.
    Edit: or as Paula suggests, create a print stylesheet.
    http://www.alistapart.com/articles/goingtoprint/
    Message was edited by: John Waller

  • Album view does not render correctly after synced changes

    I was correcting the album rendering of some soundtrack albums today and noticed that albums do not group correctly across computers when the metadata is synced using Match.  I am hoping someone can confirm they get the same results and possibly offer a fix.
    Problem
    Forcing a compilation album to render as a single album instead of multiple albums by setting the "Album Artist" and "Part of Compilation" fields does not sync across computers despite the fact that all of the relevant metadata syncs correctly.
    Setup
    Laptop and Desktop sitting next to each other.  Both running Windows 8.1 and iTunes 11.1.3.8 logged into the same iTunes account for all services.  (I am curious about running the experiment on all Macs or cross-platform, but all I have are PCs.)
    Experiment
    Step 1- Pick an album with various artists such as a soundtrack and confirm that it renders as one complete album in "Album" view in iTunes on both computers.
    Step 2- Using the desktop, select all songs on the album and change the "Album Artist" field to be blank on all of them by selecting that field and removing the text in that field.  Also set "Part of Compilation" on the "Options" tab to "No".  Click OK and the album should be rendered as multiple albums for each track on the soundtrack.  It is easiest to see this by staying in "Album" view and searching for the album name in the search tool in the upper right corner of iTunes.
    Step 3- Go to the laptop and search for the album name in the "Album" view.  It will still be rendered as 1 album instead of multiple albums for each track as it is on the desktop.  Click on any song on the album and confirm that the "Album Artist" field is blank and "Part of Compilation" is clear (the metadata should sync within a few seconds).  With these settings, the album should render as multiple tracks- not a single album.  Closing and re-opening iTunes, updating Match or updating Genius does not re-render the album view as separate albums.
    Step 4- Using the laptop, set the "Album Artist" field back to "Various Artists".  The desktop will get that update, but not re-render the album as single album.  The only way to "fix" the desktop is to reset the "Album Artist" field to "Various Artists" from the desktop.
    My Conclusion
    iTunes renders album views only when a change is made that would result in a change to the view and that rendering is only stored locally.  iTunes does not correctly update album rendering when new meta-data that should cause a change in the view is received via Match.  This is a problem because you cannot fix an album rendering on one computer and have that correction sync to your other computers.  You have to "fix" the view on each computer individually.
    Possible Workaround
    Turn off iTunes Match and remove the iTunes database and all music on all computers but one.  Using the one computer, make all required fixes and then recreate the iTunes database using Match on each of the other computers.
    Any help or comments is much appreciated.
    -rd

    I have the same problem with PDFs created in Illustrator CS3. The bitmaps inside the PDF get rendered wrongly -- inverted or decolored.
    One fix is to use ZIP instead of JPEG for the compression method when saving the file as an Adobe PDF.
    I think it is a bug in Preview 5 (already filed it with Apple). With Preview 4.2 (Leopard) or using Acrobat 8.1.3, the PDF renders fine.

  • EPS files does not render correctly in CS4 & CS5, but looks fine in CS2

    Hello,
    I am experiencing rendering issues with EPS files under CS4 and CS5. I don't believe there is anything wrong with the EPS file, as the file will render correctly under CS2.
    The EPS is a map of Australia, and it's the hill shading that fails to render correctly:
    CS2 (rendes correctly):
    CS4 (hill shading corruption):
    CS5 (hill shading corruption):
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Many thanks,
    -nav.

    Is it possible that you see the native AI data in CS2 because it has been embedded in the EPS? To me it very much looks this way, since the actual EPSdata never even has complete outlines in your other images. This is a strong indication that the paths were never properly segmented for EPS export to begin with...
    Mylenium

  • My iGoogle page does not render correctly - only header & footer are shown.

    Running on Windows 7 (64 bit)
    I was using Firefox version 3 (whatever the latest was yesterday)
    When I go to www.google.co.uk/ig I see only the header and footer of the page and no widget area in between.
    Page works fine in IE so it's not a Google thing.
    This happened following the installation of the Adobe Download manager.
    So far I have tried:
    # Disabled the Adobe DLM addin
    # Disabled all addins
    # Wiped the cache & cookies
    # Created a new profile
    # Deleted the profile folder
    # Installed FF4.0
    Still can't see my iGoogle page.

    Jaison_Sabu wrote:
    I have a particular jsp page, which has heavy volume of data and it does not load completely in IE, but loads perfectly in Firefox and Safari.
    It is a really perpleximg problem that occurs only when the volume of data is large. Why would you be sending large amounts of data to a JSP? Sounds fishy to me.
    None of the people in my team were able to solve this issue.Well if you provided your team with the same amount (none) of information you provided here, then I would understand.
    Please send in your suggestions as to why this is happening or if there are any known bugs in IE.Personally, I think it's the flux capacitor.
    In case you need an HTML version of the code, please do mail me at [email protected]
    Hope you're ready for some spam.

  • Page does not render correctly in Firefox on Windows.

    Scroll submitted page bellow first half. You will see layout broken, text through text, white and black stripes in the background. Have you any idea what causes this problem ?
    http://www.fairelanoce.fr/catalogue/categorie/animation/

    '''Edit: I didn't scroll down far enough the first time, I see it now.'''
    Looks fine for me, but I have disabled some settings that can interact badly with certain graphics cards.
    Could you try turning off a few Firefox settings. I'm not sure whether you need all of these, but no single one seems to solve the issue for everyone.
    You usually need to restart Firefox in order for these changes to take effect, so save all work first (e.g., mail you are composing, online documents you're editing, etc.).
    orange Firefox button ''or'' classic Tools menu > Options > Advanced
    On the "General" mini-tab, Browsing section, uncheck the first 3 boxes:
    # Use autoscrolling
    # Use smooth scrolling
    # Use hardware acceleration when available
    If you OK that and restart Firefox, is the issue resolved?
    Note that if some of the content getting chopped or striped is Flash video, there may be other issues.

  • Web pages posted to .Mac using iWeb do not render correctly on IE

    Okay, let's face it - most people out there use Internet Explorer (IE) to view web pages. I just published my web page using iWeb onto my iMac account. The web site renders correctly on my Mac, but does not render correctly on my PC using IE at work. Several other people using IE saw similar problems. For example, IE does not show the links until you run your mouse over them. Also, the text renders as an image (you cannot select text individualy). What do I do to ensure that all the world views the site correctly? Thanks.

    Welcome to the discussions, stoma.
    You'll have to essentially dumb your site down to IE level. Get rid of the cool effects, the transparencies, the rotated images, basically everything that makes iWeb so impressive to use. Make a nice plain site with no frills and you're 90% of the way to near 100% IE compatibility.
    Take all of your images and edit them outside of iWeb (like with other web applications) and that's another significant chunk. There will be a few bits left over, but some of those will be things you can't do anything about (like some of the page elements being created as .png's). You'll be as close to IE compatible as you can get with iWeb.
    Post your URL to let other users post as to what your SPECIFIC site would need.

  • My adobe acrobat forms do not load correctly. I have uptodate version of that software.

    I am an immigration attorney and have an online immigration program I use daily. Since the last upgrade of Firefox, the immigration forms (adobe acrobat) for my clients do not load correctly. I get a message that the forms may not display correctly with an option to open with a different viewer. The form opens correctly if I choose this option, but the form does not allow me to add and save information to the client's file so it is of no use to me. if this cannot be corrected I will stop using Firefox.

    hello, firefox 19 has introduced its own integrated pdf viewer - if you want to switch back to the plugin you've used before to view pdfs just go to firefox options > applications & define the default action for the ''portable document format (pdf)''.
    [[View PDF files in Firefox without downloading them]]

  • Adobe Acrobat Pro X 10.1.7 (Mac) does not print correctly.

    I have a Mac Pro (Model 1.1) with Adobe Acrobat X 10.1.7.  When an item is scanned, it appears correctly on the screen, but it does not print correctly.  I am sending along screenshots of what a scanned item looks like on the screen and then what prints. 
    Message was edited by: DFSons  Added photos

    Thanks Michael, have tried that, no luck. I will wait a couple of days to see if any other solutions come up (or if anyone else is suddenly having the same issue) before reinstalling Acrobat.
    [OK just tried sending a PDF attachment directly from another program (MYOB) through to Mac Mail and had the same problem so it is not an Acrobat issue afterall, it is a Mac Mail or Mac OS X issue. Will post this on the Apple site.]
    I have resolved the MYOB issue, it was working just painfully slow. So I still have the original Acrobat Pro PDF to Mac Mail issue if anyone knows of any solutions please?
    Message was edited by: jmgd

  • Acrobat/Indesign does not export correct into the selected output intention (eci_iso_coated_v2_300)

    I use the CS6 suite with Acrobat XI at windows platform.
    When I want to save a file from InDesign as .pdf with output intention eci_iso_coated_v2_300 the result is a .pdf with more than 300% ink coverage.
    I tried to transform the result in Acrobat XI into this standard output intention, but also the result has more than 300 % ink coverage.
    What is the reason of this bug?
    Before with Acrobat X this worked without problems

    Hi Rob,
    I was told the new way to work would be to draw files via Bridge direct into the InDesign file
    and I thought automatically the color would not be changed.
    my colourmanagement setting in bridge for the whole CS6 was  ECI isocoated_V2_300
    The Illustrator file was saved without color profile.
    In this test file I used 3 kinds of black: background of pirate in cmyk 79,34 / 72,78 / 59,38 / 79,88 = ink coverage 291 %
    DÜSSELPIRATEN in “black” (if you would convert this in the file with the cmyk button it would be the same ink-percentage as before
    “e.V.” was set to 100 % k
    I set the preferences for Acrobat from InDesign CS6 as pdf X4 with profile eci isocoatedV2_300 in three ways:
    no color conversion
    convert to profile
    convert to profile keeping existing values
    in all tree files the pirates background has 322 % ink coverage instead of 291 %
    Why does Acrobat convert “black” in the wrong way?  If I click in Illustrator on the 4c button to convert the “black” into 4c it is 291% ink
    Acrobat should come to the same result with all profiles: iso coated V2 and iso coated V2_300
    The same happens also by saving as .pdf X3 or .X1
    The minimum what I expect is, that Acrobat reduces ink coverage for black to 300 %
    I also made test with the new ECI profiles for laminated prints from 2012.
    And with newspaper profiles
    In this case the ink coverage comes below 300 %, but only when I choose convert to profile.
    And then the 100 % k converts to cmyk, what I don’t want to have with text.
    Is there no way to reduce ink coverage below a special percentage without changing Text 100% k
    And is there a bug in Acrobat XI with the ECI IsoCoated_V2_300 Profile? For there is no color reduction below 300 % in all conversion settings.
    I can’t test this with Acrobat X or IX, for my computers with this software don’t run with CS6 64 bit.
    enclosed you find my files
    Kind regards
    Lutz Hanbueckers
    Hanbueckers Werbung GmbH
    Brandsackerstr. 5
    40764 Langenfeld
    P.O. Box 40 02 01
    40242 Düsseldorf
    Tel. +49 02173 1 09 44 - 0
    Fax +49 02173 1 09 44 - 10
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    www.hanbueckers.de
    Visit our site
    Steady attractive offers!!!
    HR Düsseldorf B 26 480
    owner Manager: Lutz Hanbueckers
    Von: Rob Day [email protected]
    Gesendet: Samstag, 2. März 2013 04:26
    An: Hanbueckers Werbung
    Betreff: acrobat/Indesign does not export correct into the selected output intention (eci_iso_coated_v2_300)
    Re: acrobat/Indesign does not export correct into the selected output intention (eci_iso_coated_v2_300)
    created by Rob Day <http://forums.adobe.com/people/rob+day> in InDesign - View the full discussion <http://forums.adobe.com/message/5115613#5115613

  • Sometimes JavaFX form (BorderPane) does not show correctly

    We have a problem with a JavaFX application running on Java 7. Sometimes a form (BorderPane) does not show correctly – it seems to be transparent (i.e. content previously shown at the same place is still visible). Controls seem to be present and respond to events – e.g. we can close the form by blindly clicking the appropriate button. Once the issue happens it is persistent, i.e. next time we open the form, it behaves the same.
    We have no reproducible scenario leading to the issue. It just happens here and there – we have not been able to identify any pattern yet.
    Additional information:
    the form (BorderPane) is loaded during application start-up but it is not shown initially,
    to show the form we remove previous contents from a StackPane and add the form instead,
    to hide the form we do the reverse.
    Do you have any ideas how to diagnose the problem? Where to look first? What kind of diagnostic code could we put in the application that would help us?

    I am unaware of any such issue being reported previously.
    Without a reproducible test case, you are unlikely to get much assistance.
    Other than the creation of a minimal test case which reproduces the issue, I could not even advise how you might go about diagnosing and fixing your issue.
    There were many bug fixes implemented for Java 8.
    I advise you to upgrade your test environment to the latest Java early access release (currently Java 8u40) and test to verify if your issue replicates in that version.
    If the issue still reproduces, create a bug report which includes your test case and full environment details.

  • CS4 Design view does not render CSS correctly but browser does !?!?

    I am designing a layout using primarily CSS. I want to insert a table inside one of the div's. In design view the table gets pushed way out of position but in live view and on the web, the page looks correct. Why? Am I missing something in design view?
    Here is the actual page I am working on Sample Page
    Here is what I see in design view Design View
    This glitch is making it difficult to add content to the table.
    I tried to edit the page with Contribute CS4 and the table gets pushed so far out of position that it is impossible to access it. The page looks fine when I am connected but as soon as I try to edit it does not render properly.

    This question comes up almost daily, and I dont recall seeing an answer that is much different.  It comes down to that it does not matter what DV shows, it is the browser view that counts.  How frustrating it is to spend time and effort to correct a view in DW Design, only to find out it throws your browser view all askew. Its hard enough to make x number of different browsers all look good with however many screen resolutions, to worry about something that in the end does not matter.....
    Work more in code view, let F12 be your companion.
    Gary

  • CR XI R 2 and CR 2008 does not render Khmer Unicode correctly

    Post Author: khmerangkor
    CA Forum: General
    Having evaluate CR XI R 2 and CR 2008 in Visual Studio 2005 and Visual Studio 2008.  The result:When I work with Crystal
    Report Application itself is fully supporting the Khmer Unicode. Then
    I include it into VS 2005 and 2008, it does not support Khmer Unicode at all.  Basically, it does not render at all. Hope Crystal Report Development Team look into this problem and help us to develop report in Khmer Unicode.  We belive in your product.Regards,Khmer

    Don,
    the problem seem to be that Version XI Rel 2 is not only an Upgrade of Version XI (for what I just purchased a license) but a special Version.
    So I have the Trial Version XI Rel 2 and my Reg. Key does not comply with it.
    I Think SAP ony gives the user the right to use Version XI Rel 2 I you buy a full Version (even if you are Crystal reports Customer for 15 years).
    Very diffuse and time wasting the whole thing. I hope my old projects still using Crystal reports will soon run out of use.
    Cheers for your efforts
    Miko

  • ADF panelGroup component's background image in CSS does not render

    Hi,
    I have an issue with the panelGroup component, where a background-image specified in the styleClass DOES NOT RENDER when deployed on the OAS. It works fine when I run the page on my local OC4J.
    I've verified that the image I use is deployed correctly on the server.
    We are using :
    JDeveloper Studio Edition: 10.1.3.3.0.4157 (Build JDEVADF_10.1.3.3.0_NT_070619.1129.4157)
    Oracle Application Server: 10.1.3.5.0 running on RHEL 5.
    I'm customizing pages of an ADF application to change the branding and skinning. The page header region used in the application uses a 'panelPageHeader' and the image I need to introduce is part of branding and must be rendered above the application menus (2 levels: 1->MenuTabs, 2-MenuBar).
    If it would help to see how my page renders locally, here's the link: http://tech-nik-alley.blogspot.com/2010/09/adf-panelgroups-background-image.html
    (The brightly colored bar above the menus is newly introduced, ABC_Lightbar.jpg).
    Using an objectImage with my light_bar image as source, directly in the facet menu2, causes the alignment of all pages to get disrupted. Hence the work-around of using the image as a background.
    A copy of my pageHeader region is below, with comments. The panelGroup component newly introduced is in the facet "menu2". I've added the CSS definitions in the page as comments as appropriate.
    Any pointers on how to debug further, work-arounds etc. are appreciated.
    TIA and regards
    Deepak.
    =====MY PAGE HEADER REGION====
    <af:regionDef var="attr">
    <af:panelPageHeader styleClass="ss0" > <!—ss0 is "padding:0px;margin-left:14%;margin-right:14%;margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;display:block;background-color:transparent;" -->
    <f:facet name="branding">     
    <af:panelGroup styleClass="ss_brand"> <!--ss_brand is "display:block;margin-bottom:12px" -->
    <af:objectImage shortDesc="#{imageBean['SS_COMPANY_LOGO'].description}"
    source="#{imageBean['SS_COMPANY_LOGO'].physicalName}"/>
    </af:panelGroup>
    </f:facet>
    <f:facet name="menuGlobal" >
    <af:panelGroup layout="horizontal" styleClass="ss00" rendered="#{attr.globalMenuShown}">     <!—ss00 is "margin-right:10px;" -->
    <f:facet name="separator">
    <af:objectImage source="#{imageBean['SS_GLOBAL_SEPARATOR'].physicalName}" shortDesc=""/>
    </f:facet>
    <af:menuButtons>
    <af:goMenuItem text="#{sessionBean.authenticated?pageHeaderBean.loggedInUserInfo:messageBean.SS_GEN_GUEST}"/>
    </af:menuButtons>
    <af:menuButtons startDepth="0" var="menuGlobal" value="#{menuModel.model}">
    <f:facet name="nodeStamp">
    <af:goMenuItem text="#{menuGlobal.label}"
    destination="#{menuGlobal.fileName}"
    rendered="#{menuGlobal.type=='global' &amp;&amp; menuGlobal.rendered}"
    />
    </f:facet>
    </af:menuButtons>
    </af:panelGroup>
    </f:facet>
    <f:facet name="menu1" >
    </f:facet>
    <f:facet name="menu2" >     <!-- facet menu2 originally has a 'menuTabs' (level 1 menu) on top of a 'menuBar' (level 2 menu) -->
                        <!-- Change required: introduce a light_bar image above level 1 menu (menuTabs). The image spans the page -->
    <af:panelGroup rendered="#{skinFamily.menuLayout=='horizontal' and attr.otherMenuShown}">
         <!--Change: new panelGroup introduced, with a background image in the styleClass -->
    <af:panelGroup layout="vertical" styleClass="pageHeaderLightBar"> <!-- pageHeaderLightBar is "background-image:url(/ss/skin/ABC/images/ABC_lightbar.jpg); " -->
    <!--<af:objectImage source="/ss/skin/ABC/images/ABC_lightbar.jpg"/>-->     <!--Specifying the image directly, disrupts the all other OOTB pages-->
    <af:objectSpacer width="22px"/>
    </af:panelGroup>
    <af:panelGroup styleClass="pageHeaderMenuLevelOne"> <!-- Another place where a back-ground image is used for a panelGroup using the styleclass -->
    <af:menuTabs startDepth="0" var="menuTab" value="#{menuModel.model}">     <!-- The level 2 menu using menuTabs -->
    <f:facet name="nodeStamp">
    <af:goMenuItem text="#{menuTab.label}"
    destination="#{menuTab.fileName}"
    rendered="#{menuTab.rendered and menuTab.type!='global'}"/>
    </f:facet>
    </af:menuTabs>
    <af:menuBar startDepth="1" var="menuBar" value="#{menuModel.model}">     <!--The level 2 menu using a menuBar -->
    <f:facet name="nodeStamp">
    <af:goMenuItem text="#{menuBar.label}"
    destination="#{menuBar.fileName}"
    rendered="#{menuBar.rendered}" />
    </f:facet>
    </af:menuBar>
    </af:panelGroup>
    </af:panelGroup>
    </f:facet>
    </af:panelPageHeader>
    </af:regionDef>
    ===================================

    'background-image:url("../image/Sunset.jpg")' is a relative URL... relative to the final generated markup. It should be wrong like 99% of the times. You should rather use a styleClass and deal with the background-image with skinning as the skinning engines knows how to deal with such urls. Note that you'll most likely have to define a new resource loader and servlet mapping for the ResourceServlet. I know someone made a blog entry about that, was it Frank or Shay? Hmmm cannot remember... Maybe John as well. Anyway a Google search should yield good results for adf resource loader I think.
    Regards,
    ~ Simon

Maybe you are looking for