LOAD BALANCE (CSS) and Portal Port Number based on Instance Number

Hi,
My doubt is about LOAD BALANCE (CSS) and Portal Port Number based on Instance Number.
I have to install 3 servers machines and 2 servers databases cluster. There will be a HIGH AVAILABILITY environment. There will be a MIGRATION and UPGRADE.
Today there are 2 servers machines in Windows NLB. Today my production Portal is 6 6.20.
Once, I did something for LABORATORY TEST. Migration (6 6.40) and Upgrade (7.0)in two other machines. But they were with Windows NLB. When I did the installation, for each server machine and during the instalation I had to give one Instance Number for each and in result there was a different Port Number for each.
But I accessed both machines throught a virtual url(dns) with a specific port number. And it works!
NOW, with a HARDWARE LOAD BALANCE _ CSS I don't know how to do.
A guy who works with it  tell us that couldn't redirect one Port Number for different port numbers. He couldn't configure the CSS like this.
My question is: Is he write? And if he is, there is a  way to give the same instance number for my 3 new Portal servers machines? Example: 5(02)00.
Could you understand?
I need help.
Regards,
cheers,
Nivia

Nivia,
I have used F5 for load balancing, I am sure you can do the same with CSS. Yes, you can configure a virtual IP on the load balancer with standard ports (80 or 443) and load balancing the traffic to multiple servers with different ports. You can have different ports for each instance.
-Regards
RK

Similar Messages

  • Web Dispatcher not doing the load balancing on the portal

    Hi Experts
    I am having a production issue where the SAP web dispatcher is not doing the load balancing on the portal.
    We have ESS/MSS portal with 1 Message server and 2 Application servers. The Web dispatcher is installed on the message server itself. Here is my Web disp profile file
    Profile generated by sapwebdisp bootstrap
    unique instance number
    SAPSYSTEM = 16
    add default directory settings
    DIR_EXECUTABLE = .
    DIR_EXECUTABLE = F:\usr\sap\<SID>\sapwebdisp
    DIR_INSTANCE = .
    Accessibility of Message Servers
    rdisp/mshost = <hostname>.com
    ms/http_port = 8111
    #Log and Trace
    rdisp/TRACE = 2
    SAP Web Dispatcher Parameter
    wdisp/auto_refresh = 120
    wdisp/max_servers = 100
    wdisp/shm_attach_mode = 6
    configuration as per SAP note 538405
    icm/max_conn      = 7000
    icm/max_sockets   = 14000
    icm/req_queue_len = 6000
    icm/min_threads   = 100
    icm/max_threads   = 300
    mpi/total_size_MB = 500
    mpi/max_pipes       = 14000
    wdisp/HTTPS/max_pooled_con = 7000
    SAP Web Dispatcher Ports
    icm/server_port_0 = PROT=HTTP,PORT=8888
    SSL
    icm/server_port_1 = PROT=ROUTER,PORT=443, TIMEOUT=60
    SAP Web Dispatcher Web Administration
    icm/HTTP/admin_0 = PREFIX=/sap/wdisp/admin,DOCROOT=./admin,AUTHFILE=icmauth.txt
    wdisp/enable_j2ee_groups = TRUE
    wdisp/HTTPS/sticky_mask = 255.255.255.255
    In my Web dispatcher Admin page, I see all the three application servers, however the requests are going to only 1 App server. We are using ENd to End SSL configuration for the web dispatcher.
    We also have a reverse proxy in the landscape and reverse proxy is forwarding all the requests to the Web dispatcher. In Web disp Admin page>Dispatching Module>SSL End to END dispatching, I see only ONE table entry in the dispatching table and it is our Reverse Proxy.
    As all the requests are coming from only one source (Reverse proxy), it seems to me that the sap web dispatcher  is forwarding those to the same Application server every time.
    Can anyone please advise ?
    I also tried to configure logon group in NWA, the web dispatcher is detecting the logon group and all the app servers in the logon group. It still not doing the load balancing.
    I would greatly appreciate any help.
    Thanks
    Viny

    Vincent, can you please elaborate more ?  Is the web dispatcher not able to recognize stateful and stateless application requests ?
    I saw that the procedure for configuring SSL Termination on Web dispatcher is long and complicated and looks like SAP web dispatcher needs to have SSL certificate of its own. As we have no ABAP servers and only Java servers, I can not even create the PSEs using STRUST (as described in SAP help -http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/48/99c388d7c46bb9e10000000a42189d/frameset.htm
    We already have SSL certificates for Java App servers.
    I suppose there should be a way for web dispatcher to identify the incoming requests and forward to appropriate application servers.
    Any help is much appreciated.
    Thanks
    Viny

  • Load balance connections from Portals 6 SP12 to R3

    Hi All,
    Can you give me a clue/help on how i can load balance connections from Portals 6 SP12 to R3 47x200.
    I have 5 servers, but the CI is getting hammered by portal as its not load balancing the workload across the other 4 app servers.
    Regards
    Karthikeyan

    Hi,
    You have an option while creating the backend system in the portal, You can create the system as System for load balancing. I am not sure that this can be changed once you create the system. You can delete the system and create the new system with the load balancing option.
    Regards,
    Vamshi.

  • Load balancing, failover and fallback in Non-Clustered WebLogic environment

    hi,
    Has anyone implemented WebLogic 10.3.3 (or 10.3.4) in a Non-Clustered environment, but also got load balancing, failover and fallback work?
    We were successful in getting failover working using t3://server1:7001,server2:7002 provider URL, but not load balancing or fallback.
    The fallback is working when it was connecting to server2 and if we kill server2, then it switches to server1, but not when server2 is still running while server1 comes back.
    All we need to find a way to enforce fallback to primary site, even if secondary which the client connected is still up and running and primary site comes back.
    Any help appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Best regards,
    Bala

    hi,
    Has anyone implemented WebLogic 10.3.3 (or 10.3.4) in a Non-Clustered environment, but also got load balancing, failover and fallback work?
    We were successful in getting failover working using t3://server1:7001,server2:7002 provider URL, but not load balancing or fallback.
    The fallback is working when it was connecting to server2 and if we kill server2, then it switches to server1, but not when server2 is still running while server1 comes back.
    All we need to find a way to enforce fallback to primary site, even if secondary which the client connected is still up and running and primary site comes back.
    Any help appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Best regards,
    Bala

  • CSS - load balance https on different port no

    Hi,
    Need to create a rule for access :
    https://1.1.1.1:7000 (Front End), but the server only open port 7000, how can i create a rule for that?
    FYI, my CSS do not have any SSL license..is that workable??
    Thanks..

    you have both 7000 frontend and backend.
    service web-7000
    ip address x.x.x.x
    port 7000
    active
    owner MyCompany
    content https-7000
    vip address x.x.x.x
    port 7000
    add service web-7000
    active
    Use the 'port' command to select the frontend and backend port.
    You can change it to whatever you want and it does not need to match.
    Gilles.

  • Load Balancing, Server and / or Client ?

    Hi
    I am experiencing a problem with the connection pooling in odp.net. I have a simple test app that creates a connection, executes a query, populates an object then closes the connection. I have found that when I have client side load balancing on via the odp.net connection string property many connections are made unnecessary (sometime the actual number created reaches the max pool size but the numbers differ randomly). It appears that rather than a free connection in the pool being used more connections are being created which defeats the point of having a connection pool. I do have server side load balancing configured correctly also. Due to this finding can someone possibly answer the following questions.
    a) Do I need both server side and client side load balancing set?
    b) If I do why is the above behaviour being seen? If not could you give me a short explanation as to why not?
    Current set up is 11g (patched to 6, awaiting 7 to be applied) RAC, 2 nodes.
    Below is the C# code used while testing this. The table queried is a simple person table containing 16000 rows if data.
    OcConnection = "User Id=XXX; Password=XXX; Connection Lifetime = 60; Data Source=(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(FAILOVER=on)(LOAD_BALANCE=off)(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=XXX)(PORT=1521))(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=XXX)(PORT=1521)))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=MyFirstTest))); Pooling=true; HA Events = true; Load Balancing = true";
    Code:-
    Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleConnection con;
    con = new Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleConnection();
    con.ConnectionString =OcConnection;
    con.Open();
    // the command object to use for this test
    OracleCommand cmd = con.CreateCommand();
    cmd.CommandText = "select * from PERSON";
    OracleDataReader rdr = cmd.ExecuteReader();
    List<test> listTest = new List<test>();
    while (rdr.Read())
    test dc = new test();
    if (!rdr.IsDBNull(0))
    dc.id = Convert.ToInt32(rdr.GetValue(0));
    if (!rdr.IsDBNull(1))
    dc.forename = rdr.GetString(1);
    if (!rdr.IsDBNull(2))
    dc.surname = rdr.GetString(2);
    if (!rdr.IsDBNull(3))
    dc.street = rdr.GetString(3);
    if (!rdr.IsDBNull(4))
    dc.city = rdr.GetString(4);
    if (!rdr.IsDBNull(5))
    dc.postcode = rdr.GetString(5);
    if (!rdr.IsDBNull(6))
    dc.country = rdr.GetString(6);
    if (!rdr.IsDBNull(7))
    dc.email = rdr.GetString(7);
    if (!rdr.IsDBNull(8))
    dc.dateadded = rdr.GetDateTime(8);
    if (!rdr.IsDBNull(9))
    dc.randWords = rdr.GetString(9);
    if (!rdr.IsDBNull(10))
    dc.uniqueNumber = Convert.ToInt32(rdr.GetValue(10));
    listTest.Add(dc);
    rdr.Close();
    con.Close();
    rdr.Dispose();
    cmd.Dispose();
    con.Dispose();
    Thanks for your time
    Victoria

    Here are the HTTP Headers as monitored on the client side. Notice the good.txt file includes a GET as it's initial request. All works fine in this case. However, the initial request in the bad.txt is a POST. This is odd since the URL was opened using the same shortcut in both incidents and the browser was closed between each trace that was taken. I've also reviewed the shortcut with notepad to verify it does not include unwanted data such as the JSESSIONID info....etc.
    Once you have reviewed the HTTP headers, I have these questions.
    1. IIS is sending the 100 Continue messages as you mention, but why is the CSS injecting the cookie in a 100 response that is not typically processed by the client? The bad.txt file shows the client receiving two ARPT cookies because the first cookie in the 100 continue response was ignored.
    2. I know Cisco is not really in the business of troubleshooting browser behaviour. But do you know why the browser would behave differently....GET in one request and a POST in the next? We do not wish to get into modifying the browser, so I'm hoping we can provide a solution on the server side that will allow the browser to function this way if it chooses to do so. Do you think it would make sence to push the state management up a level to the cookie handed out by JRUN? This way, the cookie would not be handed back in a 100 response from IIS, and we could tell the CSS to monitor the JRUN cookie. Of course this would require we determine how to manage this cookie either by modifying to cookie to have static data for each server, or by using the right method of hashing...etc.
    Chris

  • How to enable Network load balancing for Enterprise portal

    Hello,
    We have installed EP 7.0 central instance(00) and dialog instance (01) and would like to enable network load balancing between these two EP servers.Have installed network balancer and the configuration has been done at network level.
    The below URLs are being used for accessing the portal
    Central instance :
    http://CIhostname:50000/irj/portal
    Dialog Instance:
    http://DIhostname:50100/irj/portal
    Both the port number has to be same for enabling load balancing.In order to acive this we have to map this port to http port by making some changes in Visual Administrator.
    Can you please let me know step by step  procedure or any link where i can find the same?
    Appreciate your response
    Thanks,
    Vadi

    Dear Jay,
    Thnaks for your reply.
    No...NLB will helpful in load balancing between different 2 different  application (Ep)servers.
    We are using microsoft network load balancer.Found the service http provider in VA for making those changes.
    Any way thanks.
    Regards,
    Vadi

  • Site not found using Sharepoint Designer 2013, Load balance URL and the Front end servers.

    Dears,
    My SharePoint farm is with the below configuration in our office :
    Batch processing server the with Central Administration
    Web Front End Sever 1 (http://wfe01)
    Web Front End Sever 2 (http://wfe02)
    I do have the load balance URL as http://finance.mycompany.com and as per the system administrator it seems configured properly.
    In AAM i have mapped the URLs as below for the web application in Central Administration portal:
    http://finance.mycompany.com - Default Zone
    http://wfe01 - Intranet Zone
    http://wfe02 - Internet Zone
    I was able to browse the site via the load balance URL : http://finance.mycompany.com, but couldn't open the site using the Share Point Designer 2013. It always says the site not found.
    please advise,
    thanks,
    Ammar

    What do the wfe01 and wfe02 aams do?
    Are you browsing to the SharePoint site and using SPD on the same computer, is it part of the farm or a seperate client computer?
    thanks Alex a lot for your response and appreciate the same.
    WFE01, WFE01 is connected to the one central admin on Batch Processing Server (central admin URL is http://SharepointCA:5555 and the SharePoint Web Application is hosted under port 80 on the same server). So the AAM configured on the batch processing server
    central admin.
    I can connect to the site using the SPD inside the Batch Processing server if i mention the site urs as http://localhost. But not from other client computers by putting the load balance URL - http://finance.mycompany.com.
    I can browse the sites directly putting http://wfe01, http://wfe02 and as well as the load balance URL (http://finance.mycompany.com). The custom webparts are getting crashed when i put the web application URL as http://finance.mycompany.com.
    thanks,
    Ammar

  • Load Balancing, Tomcat, and SharePoint

    I'm a new BusinessObjects customer and am working on getting all of the hardware in place for a new install.  The initial plan is to have two BOE servers, and two tomcat virtual servers, with a hardware based load balancer (F5 BIG-IP Switch: Local Traffic Manager 1600 4GB, possibly) in front of the tomcat servers to handle the load balancing.
    But, I'm starting to think that it would be a good idea for us to integrate directly in to our SharePoint portal using the SAP SharePoint Integration option.
    So, here's my question.  If we do that, then our users will get to their BusinessObjects information via SharePoint.  So, SharePoint and IIS will be the web server.  Will we still have a need for the Tomcat servers?  Will SharePoint point to the load balancer, then to Tomcat, and finally to the BOE server, or will it go right to the BOE server, thus negating the need for the tomcat servers altogether, and also even negating the need for the load balancer?  If so, can the BOE app servers themselves still be load balanced?
    Hopefully this all makes sense - like I said, we're a new customer, so I don't fully understand all of what the servers are doing.  I've spent several days searching the forums & the web & reading documentation and haven't come up with an answer yet, so I'm reaching out to you all & hoping somebody can clear it up for me.  Thanks!!

    Thank you for your input, Denis, this does help explain things.  Also, thanks for pointing me to that Windows Patterns document.  I hadn't seen that one - since we're starting out on 4.0, I've only been looking at documents under the 4.0 folders...
    It sounds like we may want to utilize this same load balancer to balance the SharePoint traffic as well, while we're at it.  Right now our SharePoint server is clustered using Microsoft Clustering, but not load balanced in any way.  Or maybe we just post a link from within SharePoint to the regular old BI LaunchPad and call it a day!
    So, if I understand correctly, if we utilize SharePoint, any traffic/processing that the Tomcat server would have handled would now be handled by the SharePoint server, which could potentially be significant.  The actual processing of the reports, though, will still get handled by the BOE Cluster, which takes care of its own load balancing, so we'll be fine.  Really the only thing the hardware load balancer does is allow the presentation layer to be load balanced - the layers beyond that get load balanced automatically via CMS.  Is that all somewhat valid?  In the patterns doc, there's Application Servers separate from the BOE Servers.  We were just going to have two BOE servers and two Web servers.  Where do the application servers fall in, and are they load balanced using the hardware piece?
    If we were just concerned about High Availability, it seems like maybe we could more easily use Windows Clustering on those Tomcat servers, and avoid the hardware component altogether.  Do the Web servers really get hammered that hard that we need them load balanced?  It seems like the BOE servers are the ones doing the heavy resource intensive tasks and we get them load balanced without the hardware anyway, so maybe load balancing the web servers is overkill.....  I'm sure a lot of this is tough to answer, I'm just trying to get a feel for it.  I want us to have our best performance & be somewhat future-proofed, but don't want to buy things that I don't need to!  We're probably looking at a small, 10-20 concurrent user setup for starters, and out to say 200 concurrent max once it's fully rolled out...
    Thanks again!!

  • Load Balancing - Problems during Portal Startup

    We are using three Portal servers (EP 7.0) and load is distributed between these servers by a load balancer.
    Load balancer does a basic check - Portal server is listening on TCP port.
    If one of the servers is really down (eg. after a stopsap) the load balancer does not send any request to that server. That was the intention.
    During startup of a server, it starts listening on the port and load balancer sends requests to it. As 20 minutes startup phase is not completed, users get a message 503- unavailable. This means we do not really have redundancy.
    The load balancer can also check for URL, but expects to get a 200 ok response.
    We tried that with page http://<server>:<port>/index.html. This was no improvement, as this page is also displayed in a very early phase of the startup.
    If we use http://<server>:<port>/irj/portal load balancer gets authentication requests and no 200 ok and does not send any request to servers, even if they are up and running.
    Question :
    What URL can be used, which works like index.html (send 200 ok), but only after startup is complete ?

    Hi,
    beside the suggestion from Michael, you could also place a HTML page inside the portal to check for. Like an HTML file in the KM that is acessible in an anonymous way.
    This page should only return 200 if the portal is up and running. And if you want to take down or simulate an error, it should be easy to rename / move / delete the page to trigger an error code other than 200.
    br,
    Tobias

  • Load balancing Internet and Site to Site VPN's across Multiple ISP.

    Hi Everyone,
    We  are currently connected to a single ISP with different Internet related  services like mail, web, dns and IPSEC site to site VPN's running. We  would be adding another ISP and do load balancing across these multiple  links. We are using Cisco ASA firewall.
    Can anyone suggest a load  balancer which can not only provide load balancing of the links but  failover as well for mail,web and IPSEC Site to Site VPN's. I came  across Peplink that can achieve this but I guess I will have to  decommision our ASA in order to install Peplink.
    Check attached diagram, this will be our proposed design.
    Regards

    Hi Sundeep,
    The simplest solution would be to put an IOS router (or two with HSRP) between the ASA and the ISPs and do policy-based routing for your flows between the 2 ISPs. Otherwise, any load balancer should work fine with the ASA. If failover of the load balancer is a requirement, you'll need to look at product specific documentation for whichever solution you choose.
    -Mike

  • ACE: load balancing servers using DMZ ports on FWSM

    devices; (2 core with the ff config)
    6500
    fwsm
    idsm
    msfc
    SETUP;
    Servers are connected to the dmzs on the core
    REQUIREMENT;
    to load balance the servers
    QUESTION;
    Using the ACE module, is it possibe to load balance the servers which are connected to the port which is configured as DMZ?
    Thanks

    does not matter where the servers are connected.
    However, be aware that the flows from client to server needs to go through the loadbalancer BUT also the flows server to client.
    So, you should be careful where you attach the ACE module.
    The easier would be to attach to the DMZ as well between the FW and the servers.
    Gilles.

  • CSS11501 load-balancing SMTP and LDAP servers

    Can anybody provide me with samples of configuration to load-balance SMTP & LDAP servers with CSS ? I feer having the same problem as with FTP when the session is initiated from the server side and that we have to make some special adds-on to the config ?

    Load balancing should work fine on the CSS. I am sure that there is some confiugaration issue. Can you post the configuration so that we can check where the problem is?

  • ACE Load Balance setup and testing - vip

    Got a new ACE 4710 and am I new to the appliance. I am testing out a senario with load balancing between two servers. In testing when I ping the VIP ip address the replies I see are from the real server ip addresses. I am just wondering if this is the correct normal behavior or should I see the ping replies coming from the VIP ip address?
    Thanks

    Do you use the
        loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
    command?
    policy-map multi-match POL45
      class VStest
        loadbalance vip inservice
        loadbalance policy L7SLBPOLtest
        loadbalance vip icmp-reply active

  • Bug with Network Load Balancing Services and SkipAsSource always reverting to true

    Steps to reproduce:
    Add an IP address to the cluster (2 nodes running Windows Server 2012) using the Network Load Balancing Manager
    Using PowerShell set the SkipAsSource flag on the IP Address to true (Set-NetIpAddress -IpAddress 192.168.1.10 -SkipAsSource $true). The flag is correctly set.
    Try to reverse the setting (Set-NetIpAddress -IpAddress 192.168.1.10 -SkipAsSource $false). Flag stays as true.
    It appears as though Network Load Balancing Services is remembering the setting from someone.
    Things I've tried all without success (in no particular order):
    Removing the IP address from the cluster and adding it back in
    Using PowerShell to remove the IP address and add it back in manually (on each host).Flag stays set as true on the 1st node but takes a second before it reverts back to true on the 2nd node.
    Using netsh to remove the IP address and add it back in manually (on each host). Flag stays set as true on the 1st node but takes a second before it reverts back to true on the 2nd node.
    Deleting each host from the cluster (one at a time), removing the registry keys CurrentControlSet\Services\WLBS and
    Removing both hosts from the cluster
    Restarting the hosts
    Using processmon (sysinternals) to try and find a registry entry that might be set when SkipAsSource is set
    Does anyone know:
    How to resolve this issue? I'm guessing resetting the TCP/IP stack would work but that's a last resort as it requires an on sight visit to the datacentre.
    Where the SkipAsSource flag it stored?
    How to reset the master/global cluster config?
    Thank in advance,
    Antony

    Hi Antony,
    I am trying to involve someone familiar with this topic to further look at this issue.
    There might be some time delay. Appreciate your patience.
    Best Regards.
    Steven Lee
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for