Load Balance FIM Service

Hello, I am researching the best way to load balance our FIM Service infrastructure and I wanted to get some advice from others who have been down this road. Here is our current set up and what we are trying to to achieve:
We currently have two FIM Service machines in place that share a FIM Service DB and use the same AD FIM Service account
Machine one has a FIM service address of fimservice.acme.com (FQN= myfirstmachine.acme.com)
The second machine has a FIM service address of fimserviceOther.acme.com (FQN-mysecondmachine.acme.com)
Each FIM service has its own
partition
Our goal is to load balance the two FIM services under one address as fimservice.acme.com. The NLB would route traffic to the original fimservice.acme.com instance as well as the fimserviceOther.acme.com instance.
Under this scenario, are there any changes that we need to make to our environment? Or will simply setting up the VIP with an address of fimservice.acme.com suffice and then just have the two nodes as myfirstmachine.acme.com and mysecondmachine.acme.com
work?
Are there any changes that we need to make to the FIM partition or is keeping them separate as they currently are ok?
Cheers!

Hi any thoughts on this would be appreciated!
Cheers

Similar Messages

Question about Load Balance SFTP service by using CSS1150X

Does anyone come across of load balancing SFTP service by using CSS1150X? Typically by configuring CSS1150X to load balance FTP service, the configuration will as follow:
content ftp_rule
vip address 192.168.3.6
protocol tcp
port 21
application ftp-control
add service serv1
add service serv2
add service serv3
active
group ftp_group
vip address 192.168.3.6
add service serv1
add service serv2
add service serv3
active
However, for my personal understanding and knowledge, I will configure my CSS1150X as follow to load balance SFTP service:
content sftp_rule
vip address 192.168.3.6
protocol tcp
port 22 //Change 21 to 22
application ftp-control
add service serv1
add service serv2
add service serv3
active
group sftp_group
vip address 192.168.3.6
add service serv1
add service serv2
add service serv3
active
My question is, "application ftp-control" in content "ftp_rule" is still applicable to SFTP or not?

I believe application ftp-control would not be used for sftp.
This might cause the session to get dropped when there is no data channel created and cause issues with long connections.
Hope it helps!!

CSS11501 load-balancing IPv6 services

Hi,
I'm new to content networking and load-balancing.
I am setting up a new nameserver network site and have the following equipment:
- Cisco 2811
- Cicso CSS11501
- Cisco Catalyst 2960
This site will have 2 nameservers which I want to load-balance behind the CSS11501. The network will be setup like this:
Internet
|
Cisco 2811
|
CSS11501
|
Cisco 2960
|
Nameservers 1 & 2
The CSS11501 will be in routed mode and will have a publicly addressed VIP (eg, 203.x.x.x) for the DNS service and the name servers will be privately addressed (eg, 10.x.x.10 & 10.x.x.11). I'm hoping this will work fine and serve the requested IPv4 DNS requests.
I would like the nameservers to also operate on IPv6 and serve out IPv6 DNS requests but am not sure the CSS11501 can perform IPv6 service load-balancing.
My question is, does the CSS11501 support IPv6, load-balancing IPv6 service requests?
Thanks in advance.
Richard.

Gilles,
Thanks for the reply.
On another site I was looking at rolling out a Catalyst 6500 CSM module to do the exact same thing as the site I have the CSS11501's at, but it too does not support IPv6 from all I could find. Does the ACE provide all the functionality of the CSM plus IPv6?
Thanks.
Richard.

Using a single CSS to load balance multiple services

Is it possible to use a single CSS to load balance 3 different services (server farm) ? That mean the CSS need to advertise 3 VIP
I'm thinking of two scenarios:
1 - configure the CSS to use 4 interfaces: 1 to public, 3 to private (each interface will plug-in to a different vlan/server farm)
2 - configure the CSS to use 2 interfaces: 1 to public, 1 to private (all 3 server farms are in the same vlan)
Will both scenarios work ?
Thanks
--Phillip.

Hi Phillip,
both scenarios will work. One CSS can certainly manage more than 3 services! You can even use just one VIP for all traffic, then just create the proper rules to send specific traffic to the corresponding service(s). No need for 3 VIPs.
Regards
-juerg

Load Balancing Forms Services with an effective healthcheck

I am in the process of configuring two forms 11.1.2 servers running with weblogic 10.3.5 with multiple forms applications clustered across both physical servers. We are looking to load balance to the various forms applications using a hardware load balancer. Can anyone comment on their experience with setting up effective application healthchecks using either hardware or software load balancers?
For example say that we have 3 applications clustered across 2 servers with the following
URLs:
http://server01:7777/forms/frmservlet?config=myapp1
http://server01:7777/forms/frmservlet?config=myapp2
http://server01:7777/forms/frmservlet?config=myapp3
http://server02:7777/forms/frmservlet?config=myapp1
http://server02:7777/forms/frmservlet?config=myapp2
http://server02:7777/forms/frmservlet?config=myapp3
We would need a checking mechanism on the load balancer that could tell if myapp2 was down on say server01 and therefore block traffic to that application yet keep traffic open for the other 2 apps on the same server.
A specific difficulty with forms is that when the database behind the application is down forms services will return an error message within a displayed error form. From the load balancer's point of view the forms services are "up". We need to find a way of detecting that the application is actually available and not just that the forms services themselves are available. To detect that the forms services are available we might normally use the status check:
http://server01:7777/forms/frmservlet?ifcmd=status
however this will only tell use the availability of the forms services on a physical server and not whether any actual applications are available.
I am aware that f5 do a BIGIP offering that includes some Oracle Forms specific components. Can anyone comment on how they have setup Oracle Forms healthchecks using various load balancing methods. In particular if a load balancer is limited to using WGET commands to check HTTP returned content is there a way of checking a forms application's availability and if not how have other people achieved an effective healthcheck?
Many thanks,
Philippe

Did you ever Get this to work?
I am having some problems trying to load balance with Oracle Forms, Discover and reports Oracle Application Server Release 10g (9.0.4.0.2) and I was wondering if you could help. Has any one ever got this to work consistently? We are an ERP product written mostly in forms (904) and are trying to implement are largest customer there performance issue so we need the load balancing to work. Will also accept other recommendation as cost effective as solutions.
Site 1:
A: SERVER
     Host as1.xyzco.local
     Version 10.1.2.0.2
     Installation Type Identity Management and Metadata Repository
     Oracle Home E:\oracle\inf_1012
     Farm as1db.xyzco.net
o     HTTP_Server
o     Internet Directory
o     OC4J_SECURITY
o     Single Sign-On:orasso
o     Management
B SERVER
     Host as2. xyzco.local
     Version 9.0.4.0.2
     Installation Type Business Intelligence and Forms
     Oracle Home E:\oracle\mid_904
     Farm as2db. xyzco.net
o     Discoverer
o     Forms
o     home
o     HTTP_Server
o     OC4J_BI_Forms
o     Reports Server
o     Web Cache
o     Management
C SERVER
     Host as3. xyzco.local
     Version 9.0.4.0.2
     Installation Type Business Intelligence and Forms Discoverer and Reports
     Oracle Home E:\oracle\mid_904
     Farm as2db. xyzco.net
o      Discoverer
o     Forms
o     home
o     HTTP_Server
o     OC4J_BI_Forms
o     Reports Server
o     Web Cache
o     Management
All servers Are:
     Windows 2003 Standard Server with current service packs
     Xeon Dual Processor with 4GB ram
     Raid 0 drives 2 for OS and 2 for Oracle
Daniel Brody
[email protected]

Oracle RAC load balancing advisory services query

Hi,
I have a query on RAC load balancing advisory.
Is it possible to create a service for exeuction of a PL/SQL package?
We have UNIX batches which are set of PL/SQL packages that may or may not be linked are executed daily. These batches consumes lots of resources.
So i want to configure my services such that say pkg1 will go to node1 and pkg2 will go to node2 and so on and so forth.
Is it possible to achieve this with Net services and LBA?
If not, is there any other way i can do this?
Thanks
AT
Message was edited by:
Amit Trivedi

Hi, my answers are:
Is it possible to create a service for exeuction of a PL/SQL package?Yes, that is posible, you can create a service for execute PL/SQL Packages, in fact you can create any service that you need and assign the resources and priorities for this service.
Is it possible to achieve this with Net services and LBA?Yes, thats posible, you define the priorities at service level and where the service must run at node level.
If not, is there any other way i can do this?Yes, if you dont wish using the LBA and services you will must create statict definition into tnsnames file for operate connection string and indicate where must connect the session for execute the package.
Luck.
Have a good day.
Regards.

Load balancing Reports Services 10g with WebCache?

Hi Guys
Does anybody have any good ideas on how to load balance Oracle Reports Services?
Can I do it with WebCache as with Forms Services?
/Jacob :)

My java application resides in a different server (weblogic) from the Oracle Application server (which has the report server). I do a browser redirect from my java application to a URL of OAS . I have hard coded Oracle Application server and report server name in one of my config files in my java weblogic server
In the above URL, servername:7770 is the Oracle Application Server. I would not have a problem with this since this will be the name of the cluster.
But the problem is server=<report server> . The report server which will pickup my request will be identified only after the browser has redirected to the URL. SO I cannot hard code it in my ajava application.
Can I just remove server=<report server name> when generating URL from my java application when I need to run report server in a clustered load balancing environment?
Sorry if my earlier post was confusing

Load balancing web services

Our architecture has 4 app servers and a central instance. Just recently, we enabled web services. The WISDL points to a specific server depending on which server you access the WISDL.
What is the recommended approach to load balance accross the servers? Set up a load balancer switch outside of SAP or can the J2EE handle internally? Should the WISDL point to the central instance? etc.
I am having trouble finding discussions or documentation on this subject.
I will reward points. Thanks!!!1

Can you go into a little more detail. We have I believe the same setup as you just described. We have 2 app servers on 6.40 and would like to load balance between them. We have set the ms/server_port_0 = PROT=HTTP,PORT=8100. (Which for some reason rsaparam has flagged as red.) We have set parameter ms/http_port = 8100 in each of the app servers. In SICF we have activated both sap/public/icf_info/urlprefix and sap/public/icf_info/logon_groups. When we run a BW querry it runs just to the CI.
A couple of questions: 1) In the 2 SICF services there is a place for logon groups, is this a pre-requisite and if so, can a normal GUI logon group work that is just pointing to the 2 app servers? If they don't work, how do you create a logon group just for HTTP load balancing? 2) Is there some other settings that we could be missing?
Any help on this matter would greatly be appreciated as we have been struggling with this for some time.
Thanks,
Jared

Does SLS support load balancing services?

Does SLS allow for load balancing of services? Such as iChat, Address Book, Calendar, Mail, Web, etc?
Right now I have four Mac Mini servers
Mac Mini 1 - Primary DNS, Open Directory Primary
Mac Mini 2 - Primary DNS, Open Directory Replicate
Mac Mini 3 - VPN, Mobile Access, File Sharing, Software Update Services, Address Book, iCal, and iChat.
Mac Mini 4 - Web / Mail
I want to get two more mac mini's to load balance #3 and #4. Meaning, if the server goes down or gets heavy load, it will start utilizing the other mac mini.
How can I set this up??

As for load balancing iAS has a component called Web-Cache which can be used for this.
For installation of iAS as per the OS you will find information at the folowing link:
http://otn.oracle.com/docs/products/ias/content.html
-- Mathew

F5 and Presentation Services Load balancing

I like to utilize F5 for load balancing 2 presntation services on clustered BI servers on windows Platform
If any one have set up F5 in a OBIEE clustered environment for load balancing presentation services , can you please share any links
to articles regarding this setup or any other information that may help understanding the configuration details
Thanks

hi,
try this blog http://bvellinger.blogspot.com/2008/01/obiee-10132-and-multiple-presentation.html
Regards
Naresh

Re: Shared SO's and Load Balancing

Thanks, Tom. I understand this issue a lot better now.
Dale
On Wed, 21 Jan 1998 23:28:33 +0000, Tom O'Rourke wrote:
Dale,
You are right in that it many times does not make sense to load balance
services that are multi-threaded.
But, when a TOOL service object is partitioned with a DBSession service
object, the TOOL service acts as if it is single-threaded regardless of if
it is SHARED or not (while the partition is accessing the database). This
means that the entire partition will be blocked (single-threaded) while the
TOOL service object is using the DBSession to access a database.
Forte blocks the partition to protect the integrity of the data being
passed back and forth to the database because the database vendors have yet
to provide a thread safe call interface to the RDBMS. This is changing as
we speak and Forte is in the process of making the appropriate adjustments.
So, this is the case where it makes complete sense to load balance a
service that is not marked as being SHARED and why it can be a tremendous
performance advantage to use Forte load balancing. As we all know, this
architecture (TOOL EVSO partitioned with DBSession UVSO) is one that is
widely used and proven to produce high performing applications.
The point you bring up is a good one and that is often misunderstood. A
load balanced SO will behave as if it is single threaded (or SHARED).
FYI, we have just added a new feature in release 3.F. Performance-based
load balancing. Check it out.
Tom
At 07:38 PM 1/21/98, Dale V. Georg wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 1998 17:24:33 -0000, Richard Stobart wrote:
Dale,
If SHARED is true in a Service Object then the Service Object is not
re-entrant (because many clients are sharing its variables and therefore is
not multitasked (Funny logical naming if you ask me)). I got a lot of replies correcting me on what SHARED means! I do know
what SHARED means, I just phrased it backwards in my post. Excuse me
while I smack myself upside the head. :)
All replicates of a
load balanced partition are not re-entrant and thus equivalent to SHARED =
true. The advantage of load balancing is that the replicates can be
distributed over machines and thus the load is balanced. What I fail to understand is this: If you have a non-SHARED SO all by
itself in a partition which is not load-balanced, it will be
re-rentrant and multiple users can call it at the same time. But as
soon as you load-balance it, all of a sudden it behaves as if it were
SHARED. Why? I don't understand the technical limitations that impose
this, nor do I understand the advantage. For example, let's say that I
have 50 concurrent users of the SO I described above. It's in a
non-load-balanced partition, so all 50 users can access it at the same
time without any problem. Now let's say my server is a little
stressed, so I decide I want to load-balance my SO and have two
replicates, one on the original server and one on a second server. But
now that I've load-balanced it, the partitions act as if they're SHARED
and my 50 concurrent users are going to be lining up in queues and
suffering from horrible response times. How is this advantageous?
================================================
Dale V. Georg
Systems Analyst
Indus Consultancy Services
[email protected]
================================================
================================================
Dale V. Georg
Systems Analyst
Indus Consultancy Services
[email protected]
================================================

Thanks, Tom. I understand this issue a lot better now.
Dale
On Wed, 21 Jan 1998 23:28:33 +0000, Tom O'Rourke wrote:
Dale,
You are right in that it many times does not make sense to load balance
services that are multi-threaded.
But, when a TOOL service object is partitioned with a DBSession service
object, the TOOL service acts as if it is single-threaded regardless of if
it is SHARED or not (while the partition is accessing the database). This
means that the entire partition will be blocked (single-threaded) while the
TOOL service object is using the DBSession to access a database.
Forte blocks the partition to protect the integrity of the data being
passed back and forth to the database because the database vendors have yet
to provide a thread safe call interface to the RDBMS. This is changing as
we speak and Forte is in the process of making the appropriate adjustments.
So, this is the case where it makes complete sense to load balance a
service that is not marked as being SHARED and why it can be a tremendous
performance advantage to use Forte load balancing. As we all know, this
architecture (TOOL EVSO partitioned with DBSession UVSO) is one that is
widely used and proven to produce high performing applications.
The point you bring up is a good one and that is often misunderstood. A
load balanced SO will behave as if it is single threaded (or SHARED).
FYI, we have just added a new feature in release 3.F. Performance-based
load balancing. Check it out.
Tom
At 07:38 PM 1/21/98, Dale V. Georg wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 1998 17:24:33 -0000, Richard Stobart wrote:
Dale,
If SHARED is true in a Service Object then the Service Object is not
re-entrant (because many clients are sharing its variables and therefore is
not multitasked (Funny logical naming if you ask me)). I got a lot of replies correcting me on what SHARED means! I do know
what SHARED means, I just phrased it backwards in my post. Excuse me
while I smack myself upside the head. :)
All replicates of a
load balanced partition are not re-entrant and thus equivalent to SHARED =
true. The advantage of load balancing is that the replicates can be
distributed over machines and thus the load is balanced. What I fail to understand is this: If you have a non-SHARED SO all by
itself in a partition which is not load-balanced, it will be
re-rentrant and multiple users can call it at the same time. But as
soon as you load-balance it, all of a sudden it behaves as if it were
SHARED. Why? I don't understand the technical limitations that impose
this, nor do I understand the advantage. For example, let's say that I
have 50 concurrent users of the SO I described above. It's in a
non-load-balanced partition, so all 50 users can access it at the same
time without any problem. Now let's say my server is a little
stressed, so I decide I want to load-balance my SO and have two
replicates, one on the original server and one on a second server. But
now that I've load-balanced it, the partitions act as if they're SHARED
and my 50 concurrent users are going to be lining up in queues and
suffering from horrible response times. How is this advantageous?
================================================
Dale V. Georg
Systems Analyst
Indus Consultancy Services
[email protected]
================================================
================================================
Dale V. Georg
Systems Analyst
Indus Consultancy Services
[email protected]
================================================

Sticky load balancing across 2 ports with cookies

Hi,
I have a server configuration where I have 1 top level Apache server that deals with SSL termination (and handles static content) and proxy passes dynamic content onto 2 Tomcat servers on 2 ports, one for http requests (9001) and one for the requests that were secure, but have now been un-encrypted by Apache (9002). My 2 Tomcat servers are load balanced using a CSS and I need this load balancing to stick to the tomcat servers regardless of port so that the user is stuck to the same Tomcat server for their entire session.
I would like to use arrowpoint cookies to perform this stickyness, but the documentation suggests that arrowpoint cookie load balancing (in fact any cookie based load balancing) requires the port to be specified in the content rule. Is this correct? Is my only option to use the source IP for stickyness? I don't understand why the port should be required if the stickyness is via a cookie. Can I not simply configure my 2 tomcat servers as services with no port and add a single content rule that load balances these services using arrowpoint-cookie advanced balancing?
service tomcat1
ip address x.x.x.x
active
service tomcat2
ip address x.x.x.x
active
owner me
   content sticky
     vip address x.x.x.x
     protocol tcp
     url "/*"
     add service tomcat-1
     add service tomcat-2
     advanced-balance arrowpoint-cookie
     active

Angela-
The issue with port is that cookies are very specifically HTTP only and the CSS has no way of knowing what protocol will hit a VIP prior to trying to address it as HTTP. Your issue is actually a bit clearer than it is initially led to be - you can still use 2 different rules by using the configuration below.
However, you might be headed for a headache if you don't implicitly control the client's actions. By default, browsers don't generally send cookies cross-protocol and definitely not cross-domain. Use something like httpwatch or iewatch to check out the headers your client sends to your site. Make sure when the 200ok arrives with the set-cookie that the client sends that cookie in all preceeding packets that are HTTP and HTTPS both.
service tomcat1
string "tomcat1"
ip address x.x.x.x
active
service tomcat2
string "tomcat2"
ip address x.x.x.x
active
owner me
   content sticky9001
     vip address x.x.x.x
     protocol tcp
     url "/*"
     port 9001
     add service tomcat-1
     add service tomcat-2
     advanced-balance arrowpoint-cookie
     active
   content sticky9002
     vip address x.x.x.x
     protocol tcp
     url "/*"
     port 9002
     add service tomcat-1
     add service tomcat-2
     advanced-balance arrowpoint-cookie
     active
With this configuration, the CSS will use the "string" as the cookie value. So if the client were to recieve set-cookie: ArrowpointCookie=tomcat1, it should use it for either rule, and end up on tomcat1 accessing either VIP.
Regards,
Chris

How to load balance everything

Edit:
More up to date list is available on the wiki:
http://wiki.oracle.com/page/WCI+Load+Balancing
Its hard to find information related to deployment anymore, as there is no deployment guide for 10gR3 and a lot of information is scattered around in outdated blog posts. I'd like to keep a list of how to design every component for HA. I don't doubt that there are a lot of errors and things that need filled in so please reply with your additions and corrections.
h3. Types of load balancing referenced:
h4. external
refers to a hardware or software based load balancing handled outside Webcenter software
h4. MPPE
the 'massively parallel portlet engine' is the portal's ability to internally load balance web services that are configured with round robin DNS
h4. cold failover
I might have the terminology wrong, but I'm referring to when you have another instance of the product installed but disabled. The instance can be turned on in the event of an ourage of the primary component, but it is not automatically available.
h1. Portal
Load balanced with an external load balancer (sticky session enabled)
h3. References:
http://edocs.bea.com/alui/deployment/docs604/networking/c_loadbalancing.html
h1. API
h1. Publisher
Publisher is able to be load balanced by breaking it up into components: publisher admin, publisher redirect, published content
h2. Publisher admin
Cannot be load balanced, use cold failover
h2. Publisher redirector
MPPE (or external?)
h2. Published content
external
h3. References:
http://fsanglier.blogspot.com/2008/02/alui-publisher-increase-performance.html
h1. Collaboration
External / MPPE (with collab internal clustering)
(Although i'm currently having issues wtih this and someone reported that you can do without the collab internal clustering)
h3. Collab's API
When using the IDK to connect to collab, custom applications bypass the MPPE and communicate directly to the collab host, losing the benefit of the MPPE. In order to load balance in this situation, the collab host must use external load balancing. (is this true?)
h3. "Search" service (the collab one) (only applies to 4.5 or newer)
Install on same servers as collab?
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13158_01/alui/collaboration/docs103/install/install.htm#i1138897
h3. References:
http://edocs.bea.com/alui/deployment/docs604/networking/c_loadbalancing.html
recent collab outage related questions
h1. Document Repository
External
h1. (AD/LDAP) Identity Web Services
MPPE to the Web Services
External between Web Services and AD /LDAP servers (or use HOSTS files to point each ADAWS server to a differnet AD server?)
h1. Search
(grid search: 6.1 or newer)The portal can load balance search requests internally. Each search node has knowledge of other nodes, so only 1 node needs to be reported to the portal. When the portal starts up, the 1 search node that is registered with the portal MUST be available.
h1. Analytics
Analytics UI
(i'm not sure? i'm guessing anything would work here because the admin UI is pretty much read only on the database)
Analytics collector can be load balanced (as of 2.5)
http://download-llnw.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13158_01/alui/analytics/docs103/installALI/quickstart.html#wp1063387
h1. Automation
Load balancing for reduncancy is not possible. However, the work can be split up Automation servers are assigned to different folders. Don't assign 2 automation servers to the same folder, as they can compete for jobs. (?)
h1. Content Upload
(mppe / external)?
h1. ALUI Directory Service
h1. Remote Portlet Service
? (i'm gussing MPPE)
h1. Notification
? no idea
h1. What else am i missing?
Edited by: Joel Collins on Apr 27, 2009 6:52 AM

Here are few bits of info:
For load balancing for Analytics, that isn't officially supported yet for the UI and Administration components. It might work with sticky sessions from portal-to-analytics but that doesn't get you much. Improving the options there would be a good enhancement request.
For the collector, I think there are two important things to remember. Use broadcast mode. I've never actually seen it in unicast mode, but broadcast definitely works. Also, remember that this is all managed by Portal and Analytics - you don't use your own load balancer between Portal instances and the Analytics Collector instances.
Finally, ALUI Directory is not certified to be load balanced yet. On a separate note, ALUI Directory has a socket leak on Windows due to a bug in the version of Jrockit that ships with it. Upgrading the embedded application server for the ALUI/WCI installation to jrockit-R27.5.0-jdk1.5.0_14 will resolve it.

Load balancing PPTP (Windows 2003) behind CSS 11500

I am wondering if you can load balance PPTP service (TCP port 1723 and GRE) behind CSS 11500, please let me know if anyone as experience with this setup.
Irfan
[email protected]

No. I dont think you can load balance PPTP service behind CSS 11500.

Best HTTP load balancing method

This is probably basic, but how satisfactory is this http load balancing method:
service http-1
ip address 192.168.1.10
protocol tcp
port 80
keepalive type tcp
active
service http-2
ip address 192.168.1.9
protocol tcp
port 80
keepalive type tcp
active
owner http
content web-domains
vip address 10.0.0.1
add service http-1
add service http-2
protocol tcp
port 80
balance leastconn
active
Should I rather use sticky-mask 255.255.255.255 or advanced-balance sticky-srcip?

It really depends what you are doing.
Some people will find this acceptable and for others it will just not work.
Do you need persistency ?
To answer this question check with your webserver admin.
does this website have a shopping basket ?
Finally, changing the sticky-mask is useless if you do not have sticky-srcip. So your question should be ..or .. but .. and ..
Anyway, it all depends what is required for your website to work.
You can try this config and if you run into problem capture a sniffer trace and identify the problem to see if a configuration change is needed.
Regards,
Gilles.

Load Balance FIM Service

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for