Load balance not work,still sending new connects to node at100% CPU usage

Trying to verify that Oracle RAC load balancing ( using Load Balance Advisor and services) is working before I recommend changes to a production RAC DB.
Even though I bury (100%CPU usage) one of 2 nodes ,new connections(using a new service I created and set GOAL=SERVICE_TIME and CLB_GOAL = SHORT ) still connecting there.( connection split stays at 50/50) . Any ideas why ?
nodes are HP Itanium ( hpux 11.23) , database version is 10.2.0.5
There are 2 RAC databases on this cluster (one TEST and one Model Office)
srvctl config service -d gdrm -s BATCHQ_GDRM_SERVICEBATCHQ_GDRM_SERVICE PREF: gdrm1 gdrm2 AVAIL:

Hi Dan,
you will have to point all your systems to the Web Dispatcher in the SLD. If you don't do this, the browser will always retrieve the URL to the central instance, bypassing the Web Dispatcher. After you configured as the system to contact the Web Dispatcher, the browser will receive the URL of the Web Dispatcher and send the request to the Web Dispatcher.
On the Web Dispatcher, you'll have to configure an appropriate rule to handle that request. You can use 1 IP and different ports. Each port means another system. Or several virtual IPs and the same/different port.
IP1:8001 -> WD -> BI 1
IP1:8002 -> WD -> BI 2
or
IP1:8001 -> WD -> BI1
IP2:8002 -> WD -> BI2
In this case, you can keep the flexibility of using several backend systems with different names/IPs/Ports and one Web Dispatcher.
For refence, you can consult the following 2 documents:
General Information about how to use Web Dispatcher:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/8105db90-0201-0010-cfbe-ae94d43e2e48
How to implement Web Dispatcher as a single point of entrance
p. 40-42: "
Internet Connectivity to SAP Applications.pdf"
(Unfortunatly, I'm right now not able to locate this document again in SDN, but it exists somewhere. Good luck!)
br,
Tobias

Similar Messages

Load balance not working right with jdbc connection string?

For months we've used the following connection string to get Tomcat to open connections to our Oracle 10g RAC:
jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION = (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP) (HOST
= db1vip) (PORT = 1521)) (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP) (HOST = db2vip)
(PORT = 1521)) (LOAD_BALANCE = yes) (CONNECT_DATA = (SERVER = DEDICATED)
(SERVICE_NAME = orcl) (PREFER_LEAST_LOADED_NODE_ORCL = OFF) ) )
Today, db2 became inaccessible during prime time, and the web app completely hung--when you tried to type in a username and password to log into the site, it would just hang indefinitely, and the Tomcat log files were complaining about being unable to open a connection to the database because of a network adapter error.
I would have expected the JDBC driver Tomcat was using to just switch to the other database server, but none of our Tomcat machines did that, and I'm wondering why (they all just hung trying to connect to db2). Our guess is that the difference this time is not that Oracle was down on db2, but that db2 was down entirely. Maybe that connection string works only if the server is up when the database is down, and not when the server is unreachable (we couldn't SSH to the box, and when we tried to get to it locally using a remote access card, a lot of options were grayed out and we couldn't see a shell, so all we could do was reset the box).

Hi,
Please refer to the link below:
SCOM 2012 – Monitoring Oracle Database OLE DB Management Pack Template
http://stefanroth.net/2012/12/05/scom-2012-monitoring-oracle-database-ole-db-management-pack-template/
Note: Microsoft provides third-party contact information to help you find technical support. This contact information may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of this third-party contact information.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

RV042 Load Balancing not working correctly?

We have an RV042 on firmware version 1.3.13.02 and 2 ISPs:
WAN1 = Telepacific T1
1.5Mbps down and 1.5Mbps up
WAN2 = AT&T U-Verse
12Mbps down and 5Mbps up
I have it set to Load Balance, Primary WAN = WAN2
Network Service Detection enabled, only pinging the Remote Host of 4.2.2.2 and set to Generate Log
Bandwidth is set to:
WAN1 = 1000Kbps upstream & downstream
WAN2 = 5040Kbps upstream & 12000Kbps downstream
It seems to pick WAN1 a lot of the time. Do I have something setup wrong?

Ok, so what do you recommend? To setup binding for ports important to direct over say… WAN1 (my fast access) shall I also keep the bandwidth management set up as is, example:
For me it’s confusing because this config appears to be clear to me that has to control traffic the way I want .
Thanks for your response.
H Aragon
De: jasbryan
Enviado el: lunes, 20 de febrero de 2012 03:18 p.m.
Para: HECTOR MANUEL ARAGON
Asunto: - Re: RV042 Load Balancing not working correctly?
Home
Re: RV042 Load Balancing not working correctly?
created by jasbryan in Small Business Routers - View the full discussion

VPN load balancing not working correctly

I have two vpn3030s configured for load balancing. They appear to recognize one another as the correct vpn(priority 10) appears to be the master. The slave however keeps getting an error message i the log "LBSSF master peer[205.172.49.252] is not answering HELLO".
He appears to timeout the master and switch himself to master where he immediately sees the master and goes back to slave. I am not sure the address above is correct for the error message, 205.172.49.252 is the virtual IP shared by both concentrators. I would expect to see hellos sent and received between the two physical interfaces. Any ideas? I am getting a buffer error on the master as well so all this may be memory related. Not sure at this point.
Johnny

it may be due to IP conflict.
also check this bug-id:CSCds70213.
Try these links for more info:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/vpn3k-conn.html
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/ld_bl_vpn3000_7602.html

Sticky load balancing not working because of Address Translation

          This came up before - see below. I don't understand what the
          soltion is/was.
          WL Server puts it's ip address in the WebLogicSession cookie
          which is an internal address 192.168.201.41
          WL proxy knows WL Server only by an external address like 139.141.38.21. Since
          it does not know of any WLS with an IP
          address of 192.168.201.41, it round-robins the request instead
          of sending it to the primary WLS.
          Any help is much appreciated.
          Mike Reiche
          Robert Patrick <[email protected]> wrote:
          >Hi,
          >
          >A very typical configuration is to put the web server in the DMZ (i.e.,
          >between
          >an outer and inner firewall) and proxy the requests from the web server
          >to the
          >WebLogic server (which sits behind the inner firewall). Since all of
          >these
          >proxied requests use HTTP and a single port, the only port that needs
          >to be
          >opened in the inner firewall is an HTTP port (the outer firewall will
          >only need
          >an HTTP and/or HTTPS port opened).
          >
          >Hope this helps,
          >Robert
          >
          >Eytan Ben-Meir wrote:
          >
          >> Thanks Patrick,
          >>
          >> May be you can suggest options for securing a WLS behind a firewall?
          >>
          >> Thanks again,
          >>
          >> Eytan
          >>
          >> Robert Patrick wrote:
          >>
          >> > Hi,
          >> >
          >> > The problem is that we encode location information (e.g., IP address(es))
          >> > in the session id. If the plugin sees a session id, it decodes the
          >> > session id to find out where to route the request (i.e., which server
          >in
          >> > the cluster contains the HttpSession object for that session). Since
          >the
          >> > plugin cannot find the machine whose IP address is encoded in the
          >session
          >> > id (because of the network address translation), this will not work.
          > In
          >> > general, distributed application software needs to be modified to
          >be
          >> > capable of handling network address translation -- to my knowledge,
          >> > WebLogic Server has not been modified to support this feature (though
          >the
          >> > Enterprise version of the product has had this support for years).
          >> >
          >> > Hope this helps,
          >> > Robert
          >> >
          >> > Eytan Ben-Meir wrote:
          >> >
          >> > > Hi,
          >> > >
          >> > > Configuration:
          >> > > WLS 4.5.1 on Solaris 2.7 inside a firewall.
          >> > > SonicWall firewall with NAT (Network Address Translation).
          >> > > Netscape Enterprise Server 4.0 outside the firewall with Weblogic
          >> > > NSAPI-BRIDGE (sp 5)
          >> > >
          >> > > The problem:
          >> > > When a browser request is sent to the NE web-erver (directed to
          >the
          >> > > firewall who then redirects to a Weblogic servlet).
          >> > > IF The servlet creates a httpsession (with or without cookies)
          >the
          >> > > request fails (the firewall blocks a request directed directly
          >at the
          >> > > non-routable ip address of the Weblogic machine inside the firewall.
          >> > > IF on the other hand the servlet does not create a http session,
          >all
          >> > > works fine.??????????
          >> > > Does any body know something about this????
          >> > >
          >> > > Thanks,
          >> > >
          >> > > Eytan
          >


          This isn't my problem.
          "Mike Reiche" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >
          >This came up before - see below. I don't understand what the
          >soltion is/was.
          >
          >WL Server puts it's ip address in the WebLogicSession cookie
          > which is an internal address 192.168.201.41
          >
          >WL proxy knows WL Server only by an external address like 139.141.38.21.
          > Since
          >it does not know of any WLS with an IP
          >address of 192.168.201.41, it round-robins the request instead
          >of sending it to the primary WLS.
          >
          >Any help is much appreciated.
          >
          >Mike Reiche
          >
          >Robert Patrick <[email protected]> wrote:
          >>Hi,
          >>
          >>A very typical configuration is to put the web server in the DMZ (i.e.,
          >>between
          >>an outer and inner firewall) and proxy the requests from the web server
          >>to the
          >>WebLogic server (which sits behind the inner firewall). Since all of
          >>these
          >>proxied requests use HTTP and a single port, the only port that needs
          >>to be
          >>opened in the inner firewall is an HTTP port (the outer firewall will
          >>only need
          >>an HTTP and/or HTTPS port opened).
          >>
          >>Hope this helps,
          >>Robert
          >>
          >>Eytan Ben-Meir wrote:
          >>
          >>> Thanks Patrick,
          >>>
          >>> May be you can suggest options for securing a WLS behind a firewall?
          >>>
          >>> Thanks again,
          >>>
          >>> Eytan
          >>>
          >>> Robert Patrick wrote:
          >>>
          >>> > Hi,
          >>> >
          >>> > The problem is that we encode location information (e.g., IP address(es))
          >>> > in the session id. If the plugin sees a session id, it decodes
          >the
          >>> > session id to find out where to route the request (i.e., which server
          >>in
          >>> > the cluster contains the HttpSession object for that session).
          >Since
          >>the
          >>> > plugin cannot find the machine whose IP address is encoded in the
          >>session
          >>> > id (because of the network address translation), this will not work.
          >> In
          >>> > general, distributed application software needs to be modified to
          >>be
          >>> > capable of handling network address translation -- to my knowledge,
          >>> > WebLogic Server has not been modified to support this feature (though
          >>the
          >>> > Enterprise version of the product has had this support for years).
          >>> >
          >>> > Hope this helps,
          >>> > Robert
          >>> >
          >>> > Eytan Ben-Meir wrote:
          >>> >
          >>> > > Hi,
          >>> > >
          >>> > > Configuration:
          >>> > > WLS 4.5.1 on Solaris 2.7 inside a firewall.
          >>> > > SonicWall firewall with NAT (Network Address Translation).
          >>> > > Netscape Enterprise Server 4.0 outside the firewall with Weblogic
          >>> > > NSAPI-BRIDGE (sp 5)
          >>> > >
          >>> > > The problem:
          >>> > > When a browser request is sent to the NE web-erver (directed to
          >>the
          >>> > > firewall who then redirects to a Weblogic servlet).
          >>> > > IF The servlet creates a httpsession (with or without cookies)
          >>the
          >>> > > request fails (the firewall blocks a request directed directly
          >>at the
          >>> > > non-routable ip address of the Weblogic machine inside the firewall.
          >>> > > IF on the other hand the servlet does not create a http session,
          >>all
          >>> > > works fine.??????????
          >>> > > Does any body know something about this????
          >>> > >
          >>> > > Thanks,
          >>> > >
          >>> > > Eytan
          >>
          >

Session replication in oc4j load balancing not working ..

Hi All,
I have windows 2000 machine. I have installed 2 instances of oc4j running on ports 8888 and 8889. I started the loadbalancer.jar in the first instance, started the first oc4j instance and then started the second oc4j instance. I have a common application deployed on both instance1 and instance2 and that is nothing but out famous SessionServlet.
If I access this servlet using http://localhost:80/app/servlet/SessionServlet then I am getting a count as 1 . My loadbalancer that is started from first oc4j instance(running on port 8888) is showing that the request is routed to the first instance. I stopped my first instance1 and then again from the same browser/session/client if I access the same servlet using http://localhost:80/app/servlet/SessionServlet then still I am seeing the count as 1 instead of 2 . At this point my loadbalancer is showing that the request is routed to the second oc4j instance(running on port 8889) since first instance is stopped. So why am I seeing the count as 1 instead as 2.
Also,
1. Is it enough that we start the loadbalancer.jar in the first oc4j instance. What about the loadbalancer.jar in the second oc4j instance ?
2. We all know that Apache HTTP Server runs on port 80. But since I didnt[i]Long postings are being truncated to ~1 kB at this time.

thank you debu, I have one doubt . In the clustering/load-balancing documentation at metalink(doc id: 151717.1) it is said that in point 4b that we should add the tag <cluster-config /> to orion-web.xml file but this file will be created only after the web application is deployed and it is accessed atlest for one time. So is it that we should first deploy the web application and then access it for atlest one time then stop the server and add this tag .. or is there any other way workaround ?

Load balancer not working on R12 shared appltop

We have upgraded from 11.5.10.2(shared application tier) to R12 and modified the context file.still we are not able to access the login page and error log showing below messages.Please let me know,if you have any idea about this errors?.
File does not exist: /u2596/oracle/oaq/inst/apps/oaq_qnalx799/portal/oa_servlets/oracle.apps.fnd.test.HelloWorldServlet
Edited by: rag100mn on May 11, 2009 4:18 PM

Hi,
Can you find more details about the error in error_log and access_log files (under $LOG_HOME/ora/10.1.3/Apache directory)?
Regards,
Hussein

Windows Network Load Balancing not working

OS: Windows Server 2008 R2
Tested in our environment both are able to talk to each other. One will be converged as DEFAULT and another will be just converged.
When deployed at Customer site, Server1 is converged as Default as seen in Server1.
Server 2 is converged as Default as seen in Server 2.
Server1 and 2 are in the same subnet and have no firewalls in between. (They seem unable to detect each other)
NLB Configurations is using multicast.
Would like to know how to resolve this issue.

Hi,
First, please try to ping each other with FQDN on the servers.
Also, please make sure that the servers are connected to a layer2 switch or hub.
To verify if this issue is caused by the misconfigure of the network device, pleae try to connect these servers to a hub for the test.
Besides, is there any warning or error related to this issue in the event viewer of these servers?
Here is a troubshooting guide for NLB, it may be helpful,
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc732592.aspx#BKMK_N
Best Regards.
Steven Lee
TechNet Community Support

Network Load Balancing not working with UDP traffic (Server 2012)

Hi all,
I manage an application that receives traffic from mobile devices on cellular networks. The traffic is UDP. I have set up two x Server 2012 VMs to form part of a NLB cluster. Each server has a second NIC dedicated to NLB. The traffic is simply NATed from
our firewalls to the virtual IP. When looking at the traffic using a packet sniffer, I can see the traffic being routed correctly to the virtual IP, but the problem is that the return traffic is sent from the IP address on the actual NIC. My application does
not like the fact that the return traffic is coming from a different source IP. Is there any way to force the return traffic to also come from the virtual IP address?
Thanks!

Hi
NLB return traffic for UDP would come from the node IPs.
You could use NAT on your firewalls so they come from the same public IP.
Otherwise you'd be looking at something other than MS NLB.
Cheers
GF

IWeb is not working for sending podcasts to iTunes, so I need a new web building tool. What is the closest thing to iWeb that I can use, which also supports podcasts?

iWeb is not working for sending podcasts to iTunes, so I need a new web building tool. What is the closest thing to iWeb that I can use, which also supports podcasts?

There's no reason you can't go on using iWeb for this - with iWeb '08 you have to publish to a local folder (i.e. on your Mac) and then upload the contents of the folder (not the folder itself) to your hosting service: and you have to make sure you enter the new URL in the Publish information or the feed won't work properly; this done, an iWeb podcast should work fine.
Of course there is still the problem that iWeb is not supported and sooner or later a system upgrade may break it. You could look at RapidWeaver: you can make podcasts with that, though the last time I looked into that - which was admittedly some time back - I didn't feel it was ideal for this. There are lots of other podcast creation programs or services around. WordPress is OK but it may be a bit of a steep learning curve: Libsyn is an online service that seems to work reliably. Blogger writes messy feeds but does usually work. Podcast Maker used to work well - I used it myself a few years back - but it rather looks as if it's gone moribund and it may not be reliable with Lion/Mountain Lion, so you would want to check into that.

I bought an Iphone in USA and when i arrived at my home i realise that the dock conector is not working, Apple send me a new one?

I bought an Iphone in USA and when i arrived at my home i realise that the dock conector is not working, Apple send me a new one?

renatasantos wrote:
Roaminggnome but i don't live at US.
That does not have anything to do with it.
The warranty is only good in the U.S.

HT201412 My 4s is not picking up phone signal I do not no how to sort this out I have tried resetting it and its not working still I do receive messages and can send them but can not call as it just says call fail

My 4s is not picking up phone signal I do not no how to sort this out I have tried resetting it and its not working still I do receive messages and can send them but can not call as it just says call fail

Try resseting the network settings in settings>general then go to reset a the bottom.
Then reset NETWORK settings.

My ipod touch microphone is not working ,i restore new os but still in mute ,please help

my ipod touch microphone is not working ,i restore new os but still in mute ,
and suddenly it gets shut down.
please help

Try here:
iPod touch: Hardware troubleshooting
You can make an appointment at the Genius Br of an Apple store and hear what they have to say.

I Installed Lion and now my USB modem will not work to send a PDF fax? Do I need a new USB modem to send faxes or is there a software update that I need?

I Installed Lion and now my USB modem will not work to send a PDF fax? Do I need a new USB modem to send faxes or is there a software update that I need? Also can I change the picture of the login screen? That grey mat looks ugly!

As posted by Ham on July 29 @ 9pm on this thread <https://discussions.apple.com/message/15786976#15786976>.
Official statement from Apple:
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht3152

TS3276 My o2 email account does not work when sending from my MAC it will accept incoming mail but not send it gives me a message that o2 account (offline) my mac I have no problem with my iPhone or mac laptop. any suggestions please.

My o2 email account does not work when sending from my MAC it will accept incoming mail but not send it gives me a message that o2 account (offline) my mac I have no problem with my iPhone or mac laptop. any suggestions please.

Sorry for the delay...
I did what you've told me, new account and manually copied my files from Time Machine. I had lots of permissions problems, but at the end, almost everything is in order... It seems it had to be with some of the Apple Preferences, but I can't be sure, as most of them were dumped to the trash can.
I still don't have my Mail Rules back, unfortunately, although I did goggled some. It is a pity, as I had around 30 or 40 of them, getting my mail in order to each of its mailboxes, but it is a small price as the rest doesn't show the before syntoms.
Thanks for the help, anyway!!

Load balance not work,still sending new connects to node at100% CPU usage

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for