Load balancing on cisco rv042

Hi friends,
This is regarding I am facing issue with configuring the load balancing in cisco rv042 .I had configured the load balancing between dual wan of leased line and adsl coonection but loadbalancing is not working fine kindly help me on this

If i close one link it takes 20 seconds of downtime and then ping goes without loses.
In the end i decided to go with PBR, since the deadline for our project was surpassed.
I set up acl that matched every other 32 adress block:
10 permit ip 192.168.100.32 0.0.0.31 any
20 permit ip 192.168.100.96 0.0.0.31 any
30 permit ip 192.168.100.160 0.0.0.31 any
40 permit ip 192.168.100.224 0.0.0.31 any
50 deny ip any any
Set a route map that sends that traffic trough one of the interfaces (Gi0/1) and let routing do the rest:
track 1 interface dialer 0 line-protocol
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.0 Dialer0 track 1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet0/1 10
Its not exactly what i wanted but its close enough:)
Thanks for your advices.

Similar Messages

Trying to load Balance several Cisco ISE servers.

Trying to load Balance several Cisco ISE servers. For persistence, Cisco recommends using Calling-Station-ID and Framed-IP-address...Session-ID is recommended if load balancer is capable of it. I have documentation for the Cisco ACE, but using F5 LTM's. Assuming this has to be done with an I-Rule as none of these are available as a default. Not sue where to begin. I tried attaching the Cisco PDF, but not able for whatever reason.

Please also keep in mind that When using a Load-Balancer (anyone's) you must ensure a few things.
Each PSN must be reachable by the      PAN / MNT directly, without having to go through NAT (Routed mode LB,       not NAT). No Source-NAT. This includes the Accounting      messages, not just the Authentication ones.
This means the       Load-Balancer must be in the direct path between the clients and the ISE PSNs.
Some       organizations have used Policy Based Routing (PBR) to accomplish the       path, without physically locating the Load-Balancer between the clients       and the PSNs.
Endpoints (clients) must be able      to reach each Policy Services Node Directly (not going through the VIP) for       redirections/Centralized Web Authentication/Posture Assessments/Native      Supplicant Provisioning, and more.
You may want to "hack"      the certs to include the VIP FQDN in the SAN field (my next blog post      should cover this trick).
Perform sticky (aka: persistence)      based on Calling-Station-ID and Framed-IP-address.
VIP gets listed as the RADIUS      server of each NAD for all 802.1X related AAA.
Dynamic-Authorization (CoA):
If you use       Server NAT to replace the PSN IP address with the VIP Address for Change       of Authorization, then you would use the VIP address as the       Dynamic-Authorization (CoA) client.
Otherwise, use       the real IP Address of the PSN, not the VIP.
The LoadBalancers get listed as      NADs in ISE so their test authentications may be answered, to keep the      probes alive.
ISE uses the Layer-3 Address      to identify the NAD, not the NAS-IP-Address in the RADIUS packet. This       is a big reason to avoid SNAT.
Failure Scenarios:
The VIP is the RADIUS Server, so      if the entire VIP is down, then the NAD should fail over to the Secondary       DataCenter VIP (listed as the secondary RADIUS server on the NAD).
Use probes on the Load-Balancers      to ensure that RADIUS is responding, as well as HTTPS (at minimum).
LB Probes       should send test RADIUS messages to each PSE periodically, to ensure that       RADIUS is responding, not just look for open UDP ports.
LB Probe should       also examine the response for HTTPS, not just look for the open port(s).
Use node-groups with the L2-adjacent      PSN's behind the VIP.
If the       session was in process and one of the PSN's in a node-group fails,       then another member of the node-group will issue a CoA-reauth; forcing       the session to begin again.
At this point,       the LB should have failed the dead PSN due to the probes configured       in the LB; and so this new authentication request will reach the LB &       be directed to a different PSN…

How can ftp service on non-standard port be load balanced using Cisco ACE.

How can ftp service on non-standard port be load balanced using Cisco ACE.For example ftp service required on tcp 2000 port

Hi Samarjit,
you can do this by specifying the port number in the class map that you create . Please find the below mentioend config guide where you can specify the tcp/udp port , range or ports or even the wild card to match the port.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/ace/v3.00_A1/configuration/administration/guide/mapolcy.html#wp1318826
Regards
Abijith

Per Packet load Balancing in Cisco Switches

Hi Team,
Can we enable per packet load balancing/sharing in cisco 3560 and 4948 Switches ? I can see two routes are installed in routing table for a destination prefix but for traffic to specific destination is not going across both the link. The option what i am getting in command line is ip load-sharing per-destination but not ip load-sharing per-packet.
Please do let me know is there any option to do per-packet load balancing
I have tried disabling route-cache, cef etc.. no result.
Rgds
Rama

Hi Ramachandra,
On both these platforms per packet load balancing is not surpported. it is a feature mostly seen in routers.
it can use the following variables for the load sharing hash (but the per packet is never used)
Source ip
Dest ip
Source tcp port
Dest tcp port
so you can configure flow based sharing based on above parameters on both the switches.
The more random variables going into the hash equation the more likely of an even distribution across links.
The src/dst ports in the equation gives us this randomization. If the same (static) variables go into the hash, the
same link is chosen.
Follow this link for more details:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.2/25sg/configuration/guide/cef.html#wp1150531
cheers,
sandeep

Two isp load balancing on cisco ACE(load balancer)

I don't know much about load balancer(ACE).
Is this is possible to load balance two isp's on load balancer (ACE). If so, how i can do so , any configuration example, or cisco document.

Wrong forum, post in "Datacenter". You can move your posting with the Actions panel on the right.

Load balance issues with RV042

Hi,
I have some issue to configure my RV042.
I have 8 voip phones and 10 pcs on my network. I used DHCP to attribute IP between 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.1.20 to the phones and over .100 to the PC. I want my phone to have their own connexion. My switch doesn't support VLAN
Here is a screeshot of my config
The phones use WAN2, the PCs use WAN1 except to send emails.
Everything seems ok. If I change the ip of my computer to 192.168.1.19 I can verify on the web that my public ip is know as the one of WAN2, and if I change for 192.168.1.115, my public IP is the same as WAN1.
Few days ago, I checked the web interface of my phones provider and I watched the public IPs of each of my phones. Some have the wan2 IP but other have wan1 IP.
I thought I forced my phone to use WAN2 internet connection ... so how would my phone providers know the wan1 public IP ?? Is there another thing I have to check or force to avoid my phone tu use WAN1 ??
Thanks in advance,
Franxoois

Up
Any advice or something I should learn or check ? Is this normal or known bug ?
Is there an easiesr way to do something like that ?

Ask the Expert: Configuration and Troubleshooting the Cisco Application Control Engine (ACE) load balancer

With Ajay Kumar and Telmo Pereira
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about configuration and troubleshooting the Cisco Application Control Engine (ACE) load balancer with Cisco expert Ajay Kumar and Telmo Pereira. The Cisco ACE Application Control Engine Module for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switches and Cisco 7600 Series Routers is a next-generation load-balancing and application-delivery solution. A member of the Cisco family of Data Center 3.0 solutions, the module: Helps ensure business continuity by increasing application availability Improves business productivity by accelerating application and server performance Reduces data center power, space, and cooling needs through a virtualized architecture Helps lower operational costs associated with application provisioning and scaling
Ajay Kumar is a customer support engineer in the Cisco Technical Assistance Center in Brussels, covering content delivery network technologies including Cisco Application Control Engine, Cisco Wide Area Application Services, Cisco Content Switching Module, Cisco Content Services Switches, and others. He has been with Cisco for more than four years, working with major customers to help resolve their issues related to content products. He holds DCASI and VCP certifications.
Telmo Pereira is a customer support engineer in the Cisco Technical Assistance Center in Brussels, where he covers all Cisco content delivery network technologies including Cisco Application Control Engine (ACE), Cisco Wide Area Application Services (WAAS), and Digital Media Suite. He has worked with multiple customers around the globe, helping them solve interesting and often highly complex issues. Pereira has worked in the networking field for more than 7 years. He holds a computer science degree as well as multiple certifications including CCNP, DCASI, DCUCI, and VCP
Remember to use the rating system to let Ajay know if you have received an adequate response.
Ajay and Telmo might not be able to answer each question due to the volume expected during this event. Remember that you can continue the conversation on the Data Center sub-community discussion forum Application Networking shortly after the event.
This event lasts through July 26, 2013. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other community members.

Hello Krzysztof,
Another set of good/interesting questions posted. Thanks!
I will try to clarify your doubts.
In the output below both resources (proxy-connections and ssl-connections rate) are configured with a min percentage of resources (column Min), while 'Max' is set to equal to the min.
ACE/Context# show resource usage
                                                     Allocation
        Resource         Current       Peak        Min        Max       Denied
-- outputs omitted for brevity --
proxy-connections             0      16358      16358      16358      17872
ssl-connections rate          0        626        626        626      23204
Most columns are self explanatory, 'Current' is current usage, 'Peak' is the maximum value reached, and the most important counter to monitor 'Denied' represents the amount of packets denied/dropped due to exceeding the configured limits.
On the resources themselves, Proxy-connections is simply the amount of proxied connections, in other words all connections handled at layer 7 (SSL connections are proxied, as are any connections with layer 7 load balance policies, or inspection).
So in this particular case for the proxy-connections we see that Peak is equal to the Max allocated, and as we have denies we can conclude that you have surpassed the limits for this resource. We see there were 17872 connections dropped due to that.
ssl-connections rate should be read in the same manner, however all values for this resource are in bytes/s, except for Denied counter, that is simply the amount of packets that were dropped due to exceeding this resource.
For your particular tests you have allocated a min percentage and set max equal to min, this way you make sure that this context will not use any other additional resources.
If you had set the max to unlimited during resource allocation, ACE would be allowed to use additional resources on top of those guaranteed, if those resources were available.
This might sound a great idea, but resource planning on ACE should be done carefully to avoid any sort of oversubscription, specially if you have business critical contexts.
We have a good reference for ACE resource planning that contains also description of all resources (this will help to understand the output better):
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/ace/v3.00_A2/configuration/virtualization/guide/config.html#wp1008224
1) When a resource is utilized to its maximum limit, the ACE denies additional requests made by any context for that resource. In other words, the action is to Drop. ACE should in theory silently drop (No RST is sent back to the client). So unless we changed something on the code, this is what you should see.
To give more context, seeing resets with SSL connections is not necessarily synonym of drops. As it is usual to see them during normal transactions.
For instance Microsoft servers are usually ungracefully terminating SSL connections with RESET. Also when there is renegotiation during an SSL transaction you may see RESETS, but this will pass unnoticed for end users.
2) ACE will simply drop/ignore new connections when we reach the maximum amount of proxied connections for that context. Exisiting connections will continue there.
As ACE doesn't respond back, client would simply retransmit, and if he is lucky maybe in the next attempt he will be able to establish the connection.
To overcome the denies, you will definitely have to increase the resource allocation. This of course, assuming you are not reaching any physical limit of the box.
As mentioned setting max as unlimited might work for you, assuming there are a lot of unused resources on the box.
3) If a new connection comes in with a sticky value, that matches the sticky entry of a real server, which is already in MAXCONNS state, then both the ACE module/appliance should reject the connection and that sticky entry would be removed.
The client would at that point reestablish a new connection and ACE would associate a new sticky entry with the flow for a new RSERVER after the loadbalancing decision.
I hope this makes things clearer! Uff...
Regards,
Telmo

Default WAN in RV042 Load Balancing

If I choose the RV042 mode as load balancer and bind some protocol to specific WANs, what will happen to the protocols that I didn't bind to any specific WAN? will they go to WAN1 by default?
Thanks

Hi,
When Load Balance is enabled, RV042 will dispatch (using weighted Round Robin) incoming sessions to WAN1 and WAN2 according to the ratio of the WAN bandwidth. A session is defined by a TCP connection or a UDP stream with certain timeout.
I found this in the users guide.
* Dual WAN. There are two functions provided for users – Smart Link Backup and Load Balance..
* If Smart Link Backup is selected, you only need to choose which WAN port is the primary and then the other will be the backup. See Figure 6-22.
* If Load Balance is selected, there will be two main choices:
•    By Traffic – Intelligent Balancer (Auto) and user defined. See Figure 6-23. First, choose the Max. Bandwidth of Upstream (64K/128K/256K/384K/512K/1024K/1.5M/2M/2.5M or above) and Downstream (512K/1024K/1.5M/2M/2.5M or above) for WAN1 and WAN2, as provided by your ISP.
•    Intelligent Balancer (Auto): When choosing Intelligent Balancer, it will automatically compute the maximum bandwidth of WAN1 and WAN2 by using Weighted Round Robin to balance the loading. If (upstream / downstream / upstream or downstream) bandwidth is excessive (30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%), bring up the second link. When there is an inactivity time-out (None/10min/20min/30min/40min/50min/60min), the second link will be terminated.
Adding to this is the operation of Network Service Detection (NSD), which allows RV042 to ping the liveliness of the default gateway of the WAN port or a specified Host. The retry timeout and retry count will affect how long RV042 determines the WAN is down. By default the detection time is
(Retry timeout) + (Retry count) * (5 sec) // the 5 sec is hard coded (which is about 1 minute)

Office Web Apps Load Balancing Configuration Issue for SharePoint 2013

I have load balanced servers dedicated for Office Web Apps with name “md1xxxwfe1” and “md1xxxwfe2”
, both this servers are load balanced by CISCO Load balancer. And I have mapped Load Balancer Virutal IP with host name officeapps.jda.corp.local in the DNS records.
Things are working fine if I add new farm by using New-OfficeWebAppsFarm
with server name as internalurl in PowerShell console
as like “ -internalurl http://
md1xxxwfe1 but when I use –internalurl officeapps.jda.corp.local it is not working at all. I’m not getting what to do at this point.
I have gone through following blogs but no luck.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/meamcs/archive/2013/03/27/office-web-apps-2013-multi-servers-nlb-installation-and-deployment-for-sharepoint-2013-step-by-step-guide.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/b/office_resource_kit/archive/2012/09/11/introducing-office-web-apps-server.aspx
http://davidlimsharepoint.blogspot.in/2013/02/installing-and-configuring-office-web.html
http://sps2013.blogspot.in/2013/09/office-web-apps-with-sharepoint-2013.html
The output of the wfe1 server is attached with this. When I open http:// /hosting/discovery in wfe1 I’m getting following result (attached
screenshot) but it should show hostname rather than server name.
Please help me
Thanks, Ram Ch

Hi Ram ,
For troubleshooting your issue, please take steps as below:
Just about any load balancing solution will work, including a server that runs the Web Server (IIS) role running Application Request Routing (ARR):Install
Application Request Routing
Install the certificate on the load balancer as described under Securing Office Web Apps Server communications by using
HTTPS.
Make sure you have configured the cluster correctly for full internet name:
Reference:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj219435.aspx#loadbalancer
Thanks,
Eric
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support,
contact [email protected]
Eric Tao
TechNet Community Support

Request failover between Load Balancer and OAS 10.1.3.3

Hello,
I have a Load Balancer hardware "Cisco 11500 content service"
Working on 4 applications server OAS 10.1.3.3 on the oracle enterprise lunix
We are using Oracle HTTP Server And deployed application Under (j2ee) I am using Cluster between them "instant” as the same on all 4 servers
If an OC4J process goes down between requests, then this module is able to hide that failure from the end user by transparently routing the next request to another OC4J that is available within the same group of JVM.
BUT when I shutdown the opmn the Load Balancer Hardware is still sending that requests to the opmn that is already down
How can I configure or fix that request that is common to that opmn stopped process
Do you have the solution to solve this issue?
Thanks.
Regards.
Moataz

Dear All,
Will appreciate if someone can answer this. Please let me know.........
Regards
Moataz Alem

Server Load-balancing and ACL router decision

Hello,
My 2 server farm distribution switches are running in "hybrid" mode, with CAT OS on the switch and IOS on the MSFC.
My server team is asking to block traffic to a specific server that is load balanced using Cisco's CSM load-balancer which is also installed in the chassis.
The question that I have is this.
Does anyone know in what order the MSFC will inspect and apply the ACL and when will the CSM make the load balancing decision?
The reason I need to know this is that the CSM is setup in bridged mode, where traffic to the server comes into the MSFC with a destination IP of a VIP which resides on the CSM. Subsequently, the CSM forwards the traffic to the one of the real servers in the load-balanced server farm after it makes its load-balancing decision. Which ocurrs first??
Does anyone have any info on what ocurrs first and so forth??
Is there a link to Cisco's website that explains this process??
Thanks in advance for your help.
Tony

Tony,
It sounds as if your setup is like this:
Client VLAN----MSFC----VLAN A----CSM----Server VLAN
With VLAN A and Server VLAN being the same IP subnet.
In this case all client traffic reaching the VIPs on the CSM first traverses the MSFC. So, if you want to block traffic to a specific VIP or Server IP you can do that on the MSFC's Interface for Client VLAN. You could configure an access list that filters inbound traffic on that VLAN interface.
Make sense?
-Brad

Question about Load Balancing Wireless connections using WLC- F5- ISE

Hi all,
Can anyone give me some orientation how the radius auth process/handshake between the WLC and ISE changes once the F5 is installed in the middle in order to perform load balancing?
We can do some kind of load balancing by configuring different radius servers on each WLC for which, I must configure the same shared secret in the WLC and ISE so the radius request/accept could be processed.
Now that we have the F5 in the middle, do I need to create/configure the same shared secret in the F5 so radius transactions can be processed by this device?. Based on the following link, I must configure the F5 in the ISE like another NAD device (similar to the WLC) but I do not know if this additional configuration in the ISE includes the Auth parameter to be added in the ISE NAD (F5) configuration.
How to properly use a load balancer in Cisco's Identity Services Engine
http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/load-balancing-cisco-identity-services-engine
Our sheme is shown next,

When you covert the pair into SSO, all the APs will go to the ACTIVE unit. No unit will "live" in the standby unit because this unit will "share" the AP-support license between the two.
This is the first step you need to get sorted. Send an email to [email protected] and give them the exact details of what you want to do (i. e. AP SSO) and then provide the serial number of your nominated active WLC and the serial number of your nominated standby WLC.

CSS 11501 Load Balancing Issue

Hi,
We are facing some issue in load balancing in cisco CSS 11501 as we are not able to access the application through virtual IP. Below is the ruuning configuration of the CSS:
CSS11501# sh running-config
!Generated on 10/06/2010 16:51:34
!Active version: sg0810106
configure
!*************************** GLOBAL ***************************
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 132.186.199.1 1
!************************** CIRCUIT **************************
circuit VLAN1
ip address 132.186.199.145 255.255.255.0
!************************** SERVICE **************************
service Server1
ip address 132.186.199.243
port 5001
protocol tcp
keepalive port 5001
active
service Server2
ip address 132.186.199.246
protocol tcp
port 5001
keepalive port 5001
active
!*************************** OWNER ***************************
owner L5_Owner
content L3_Rule
    vip address 132.186.199.146
    protocol tcp
    port 5001
    add service Server1
    add service Server2
    active
content L5_Rule
    vip address 132.186.199.146
    add service Server1
    add service Server2
    protocol tcp
    port 5001
    url "//132.186.199.146:5001/emi"
    active
CSS11501#
Observation : We are able to telnet on VIP: 132.186.199.146 on port 5001, but not able to access the application.
In Actual scenarion customer access application by accessing URL: http://132.186.199.243:5001/emi and once he enter this URL in web browser the request redirects ( by server itself) to URL: https://132.186.199.44:6002/cas/login?service=http%3A%2F%2F132.186.199.243%3A5001%2Femi%2Findex.jsp&acceptStrength=BASIC on backend server for user authenticaton and once user is authenticated then it again redirect to main URL ( http://132.186.199.243:5001/emi ) to access the application but when we are trying to access the application through VIP ( URL: http://132.186.199.146:5001/emi) we are not getting the login page as the request is not gettting redirected to backend server for user authentication.
Please suggest a solution here.

The problem is that you are in one-armed mode.
So you need to configure client nat.
Without nating the client ip address, the server response goes back directly to the client and bypasses the CSS.
Therefore the client receives a response from an unknown server ip address (not the vip).
So configure a group.
For example
group Client
    vip address 132.186.199.146
    add destination service Server1
     add destination service Server2
    active
Also, remove the url command from your content rule.
It is useless in your case and will just make performance worst.
Gilles.

ACE Routing Load-Balance problem

I'm trying to configure a routing load-balance with Cisco ACE Module based on the following scenario:
local users has a router (R1) as it default gateway, this router (R1) has a default route to the VIP that represent the serverfarm with two linux servers that should be used for Data Shaping over the WAN. I need to balance the traffic over the two linux servers and not necessary over the WAN.
The problem is that when I set up the local network router default route to VIP the routing process simply stop work ! If I change the route to the real server ip address everything start working again without any problem.
Follow the configs:
Local network Router - Static route
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ip route 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 (VIP address)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Follow the ACE configs:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
access-list 100 line 8 extended permit ip any any
rserver host rout001
ip address 10.0.0.32
inservice
rserver host rout002
ip address 10.0.0.31
inservice
serverfarm host BLC_ROUTING
predictor leastconns
rserver rout001
inservice
rserver rout002
inservice
class-map match-any VIP
2 match virtual-address 10.0.0.1 any
class-map type management match-any mgmt
2 match protocol icmp any
3 match protocol telnet any
4 match protocol ssh any
policy-map type management first-match access
class mgmt
permit
policy-map type loadbalance first-match INT_router
class class-default
serverfarm BLC_ROUTING
policy-map multi-match VIP
class VIP
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy INT_router
loadbalance vip icmp-reply
interface vlan 6
bridge-group 10
access-group input 100
service-policy input access
service-policy input VIP
no shutdown
interface vlan 8
bridge-group 10
access-group input 100
service-policy input access
service-policy input VIP
no shutdown
interface bvi 10
ip address 10.0.0.5 255.255.255.0
no shutdown
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I tried to change some parameters like "transparent" at serverfarm config and change the "predictor" method to "hash address source" but there was no good results at all.
Anyone has any idea why this process is not working ?
Is there any special configuration for this scenario ?
Regards,
Ricardo

Ricardo,
What is this route ??
ip route 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 (VIP address)
You can't have 0.0.0.0/24.
You must be missing something ?
Also, since the vip is part of a vlan with subnet 10.0.0.0/24 you don't need to add a static route to reach that vip.
It should normally be directly connected to your router.
With the static route, do you see traffic coming to the ACE module ?
Does it loadbalance to the server ?
'show service-policy detail' check the packet counters
Gilles.

Cisco RV042 - Dual Wan Load Balancing - Secure Site (HTTPS) Trouble

PID VID :
RV042 V03
Firmware Version :
v4.0.0.07-tm (Aug 19 2010 19:19:50)
Ever since I setup my RV042 with load balancing using the Dual Wan system I have had trouble staying connected to some secure sites. After doing some searching I found that the potential issue is the IP change mid session.
"http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/r25537589-Cisco-RV042-can-not-use-load-balancing-for-some-web-sites"
Although my interface is significantly different I was able to find the same area in my RV042 admin area however, it doesn't seem to work.
System Management
> Dual Wan
In Wan 1 & Wan 2 I have HTTPS and HTTPS Secondary all forwarded to use Wan 2 under Protocol Binding
This however has not managed to do anything at all for my network and every computer conneceted experiences the same HTTPS irregularities at some websites.
I'm sure I must be doing something wrong, but I don't know what it is.
Both incoming connections are from the same service provider although the plans are different.
Any help with this would greatly help me stop losing my mind trying to fight with my website control panel for 10 minutes to just login and get something done.
Thanks

Any ideas or advice from anyone?

Load balancing on cisco rv042

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for