Load Balancing with Reverse Proxy Plug-in in SunOne 6.1

Hello
we are configuring our reverse proxy web server SunOn 6.1 for load balancing and we have some conflicting information that we have found on the internet. The options we have found are the following:
1- In one case, it seems that all we need to do is add the destination servers to the servers parameter (quoted, space-delimited). We have read that the proxy server will simply round-robin requests.
2- In another case, we have seen that we have to use an loadbalancer.xml file with the server names and reference the file from both magnus.conf and obj.conf.
I have doubts about the second option because I really think this is configuration in 7.0 not 6.1.
Also, I also need to configure session stickiness but it is not clear how this works. There is an option for sticky cookies that defaults to JSESSIONID if not configured. Does this mean that I will have session stickiness but simply without the use of cookies?
ANY HELP? We need to solve this in the next day.

HI,
This may work for you.
obj.conf
<Object name="passthrough1">
Service fn="service-passthrough" servers="http://localhost:8080"
</Object>
<Object name="default">
AuthTrans fn="match-browser" browser="MSIE" ssl-unclean-shutdown="true"
NameTrans fn="assign-name" from="/idm(|/*)" name="passthrough1"
NameTrans fn="ntrans-j2ee" name="j2ee"
NameTrans fn="pfx2dir" from="/mc-icons" dir="D:/Sun/WebServer6.1/ns-icons" name="es-internal"
NameTrans fn="document-root" root="$docroot"
PathCheck fn="nt-uri-clean"
PathCheck fn="check-acl" acl="default"
PathCheck fn="find-pathinfo"
PathCheck fn="find-index" index-names="intro.htm,index.html,home.html,index.jsp"
ObjectType fn="type-by-extension"
ObjectType fn="force-type" type="text/plain"
Service method="(GET|HEAD)" type="magnus-internal/imagemap" fn="imagemap"
Service method="(GET|HEAD)" type="magnus-internal/directory" fn="index-common"
Service method="(GET|HEAD|POST)" type="~magnus-internal/" fn="send-file"
Service method="TRACE" fn="service-trace"
Error fn="error-j2ee"
AddLog fn="flex-log" name="access"
</Object>
<Object name="j2ee">
Service fn="service-j2ee" method="*"
</Object>
<Object name="cgi">
ObjectType fn="force-type" type="magnus-internal/cgi"
Service fn="send-cgi"
</Object>
<Object name="es-internal">
PathCheck fn="check-acl" acl="es-internal"
</Object>
============================================
magnus.conf
# The NetsiteRoot, ServerName, and ServerID directives are DEPRECATED.
# They will not be supported in future releases of the Web Server.
NetsiteRoot D:/Sun/WebServer6.1
ServerName abc
ServerID https-www.abc.com
RqThrottle 128
DNS off
Security off
ExtraPath D:/Sun/WebServer6.1/bin/https/bin
Init fn=flex-init access="$accesslog" format.access="%Ses->client.ip% - %Req->vars.auth-user% [%SYSDATE%] \"%Req->reqpb.clf-request%\" %Req->srvhdrs.clf-status% %Req->srvhdrs.content-length%"
Init fn="load-modules" shlib="D:/Sun/WebServer6.1/bin/https/bin/j2eeplugin.dll" shlib_flags="(global|now)"
Init fn="load-modules" shlib="D:/Sun/WebServer6.1/plugins/passthrough/passthrough.dll"

Similar Messages

  • Load Balancing in Reverse Proxy  Mode

    Hi,
    Is the HTTP Load Balancing function working only in the Routing context or works it generally. I set the SJWPS as a Reverse Proxy like this
    NameTrans fn="reverse-map" from="http://server1.domain.de" to="http://proxy.domain.de" rewrite-location="false" rewrite-content-location="false"
    NameTrans fn="map" from="http://proxy.domain.de" to="http://server1.domain.de" rewrite-host="false"
    NameTrans fn="map" from="/" to="http://server1.domain.de" rewrite-host="false"
    Now the Proxy should do Load balancing with a second, mirrored server like http://server2.domain.de. How could I configure that?
    Please help me.
    InfoSeeker09
    Edited by: InfoSeeker09 on Sep 11, 2009 2:18 AM

    if you need to route / provide load balancing between 2 hosts, then you will need to have Route SAF . you can use web server 7 reverse proxy cli or gui to get this. however, you might want to start from a fresh configuration to avoid reverse-map / map that you have experimented with does not overlap with the 'Route' functionality that you seem to need here
    here are some reference content
    http://blogs.sun.com/amit/entry/setting_up_a_reverse_proxy
    http://blogs.sun.com/meena/entry/configuring_reverse_proxy_in_sun
    http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/features/articles/web_server_zones.jsp

  • Reverse Proxy plug in and Load Balancer Plug in

    Hi,
    Can anyone please provide me with an example obj.conf file showing how to combine the reverse proxy plug-in and Load Balancer plug-in.
    I would like to use the reverse proxy plug in to detect when static content is requested and provide this from the web server. Requests for dynamic content would then be forwarded to an Application server via the Load balancer plug-in. I have found plenty of documentation on how to configure these plug-in separately but nothing on how to combine the two.

    smiking
    reverse proxy plugin - its job is to forward the requests to another server for a specific task. you can use the webserver 7 . it does forward and limited load balancing (using round robin ) based on the number of servers you provide in the configuration. i would say this is a poor man's setup.
    load balancer plugin - some app servers like sun java system app server or web logic provide this plugin so that you can effectively use the back end app server
    with both these setup, you can <if> constructs to determine which requests need to be forwarded to the back end server.
    I wonder, why do you need both - if both of them is designed to do the same thing.

  • Load balancing with JSP

    Anyone and everyone,
    When configuring load balancing with Weblogic clusters, does load
    balancing take effect for all services or just EJB and RMI? Or another
    way of saying the same thing, can I setup weighted load balancing for
    the JSP engines across 2 weblogic servers.
    Thanks in advance,
    Mike

    The load-balancing documentation you read describing the different algorithms only applies to RMI stubs (e.g., EJB clients). Please see http://www.weblogic.com/docs51/cluster/concepts.html#1026091 for a description of how load-balancing/clustering works with servlets/JSPs.
    The short answer is that in using servlet clustering, most people want/need/use in-memory replication for HttpSession objects. In WLS 5.1 (and before), in-memory replication requires one or more proxy servers be set-up in front of the cluster. Typically, most people use something like BigIP to load-balance
    across the proxy servers and let the weblogic plug-in for the proxy server handle the routing to the cluster. The plug-in uses round-robin until an HttpSession is established for a user, then it always tries to route to the server where the user's session is located.
    Hope this helps,
    Robert
    Brian Lin wrote:
    All,
    I have a quesiton here regarding load balancing with DNS round robin. As of Chapter Adminstration of Clustering Weblogic server, Weblogic can be configured to balance by weight. How about Weblogic handle weight based balancing after DNS round robin ip response? or just can choose one way instead of both?
    What's the big difference between choosing BigIP and software balancing (WL)?
    Brian
    "Wei Guan" <[email protected]> wrote:
    I don't think you can configure this load balancing in weblogic in current
    release. However, if you have Big-IP or LocalDireoctr, you can set up
    weighted load-balancing there. Otherwise, weblogic proxy will use DNS round
    robin to do the load-balancing between JSP engins.
    My 2 cents.
    Cheers - Wei
    Michael Yakimisky <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    Anyone and everyone,
    When configuring load balancing with Weblogic clusters, does load
    balancing take effect for all services or just EJB and RMI? Or another
    way of saying the same thing, can I setup weighted load balancing for
    the JSP engines across 2 weblogic servers.
    Thanks in advance,
    Mike

  • Load balancing by the proxy plugin

    Has anyone encountered this before:
    I have a cluster of two WLS 5.1 servers, hosting servlets that serve web
    requests. The requests are proxied through a web server ( I have tried
    Weblogic, Apache as well as IIS). I also have a tool that simulates
    concurrent web requests and fires them to the proxy server.
    As per documentation, as the load balancing while proxying requests to
    servlets is round robin, I expect that the requests are uniformly
    distributed across the two weblogic servers. But what I see is a bit
    different. In one case I fired 15 requests and found that 11 went to first
    server and 4 went to the other.
    Second time when I fired again 2 of them went to the first server and 13 to
    the second one. I would expect that around half of the total requests
    should be routed to each server everytime so that there is a proper load
    balancing done by the proxy. I have not changed any configuration related
    to the default load balancing algorithm. So I expect it is round-robin.
    Has anyone encountered this before ? This happens to me irrespective of
    which proxy server I use (i.e which proxy plugin I use). Is there some
    other configuration required and I am missing something or is there some
    inherent problem with the load balancing of the proxy plugins. Any info
    would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Mainak

    Could you post this in weblogic.developer.interest.plug-in? This group is for
    ejb related questions. Thanks.
    Bill
    Mainak Datta wrote:
    Has anyone encountered this before:
    I have a cluster of two WLS 5.1 servers, hosting servlets that serve web
    requests. The requests are proxied through a web server ( I have tried
    Weblogic, Apache as well as IIS). I also have a tool that simulates
    concurrent web requests and fires them to the proxy server.
    As per documentation, as the load balancing while proxying requests to
    servlets is round robin, I expect that the requests are uniformly
    distributed across the two weblogic servers. But what I see is a bit
    different. In one case I fired 15 requests and found that 11 went to first
    server and 4 went to the other.
    Second time when I fired again 2 of them went to the first server and 13 to
    the second one. I would expect that around half of the total requests
    should be routed to each server everytime so that there is a proper load
    balancing done by the proxy. I have not changed any configuration related
    to the default load balancing algorithm. So I expect it is round-robin.
    Has anyone encountered this before ? This happens to me irrespective of
    which proxy server I use (i.e which proxy plugin I use). Is there some
    other configuration required and I am missing something or is there some
    inherent problem with the load balancing of the proxy plugins. Any info
    would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Mainak

  • Load Balancing with BigIP / SSL question

    I have an oddball question. We're load balancing ColdFusion
    MX7 across 3 servers using a BigIP load balancing server. We
    decided to go the hardware approach and it has been great except
    for one small configuration issue.
    We use a mix of SSL and non SSL pages, prior to the switch
    from a single server to a load balanced setup I used to script that
    would determine if a page that was supposed to be SSL had the
    variable CGI.HTTPS turned on or off. If it was off, the page would
    redirect back to itself with the SSL turned on.
    The problem we have is that we followed BigIP's instruction
    to secure the load balancing hardware instead of the three servers
    running behind it. So what happens is that the traffic goes to the
    load balancer port 441, but then the calls from the load balancer
    to the individual servers is port 80. So even if a page is called
    as HTTPS://... the coldfusion server says that CGI.HTTPS is "off"
    since the traffic is port 80.
    This isn't much of a problem, our SSL pages are linked as
    HTTPS:// and the only problem would actually arise if someone was
    to type in the URL and call it as HTTP rather than HTTPS.
    My questions is this, does anyone know of a way that I can
    detect if the page should be HTTPS and is not without changing our
    configuration and putting SSL certificates on each individual
    server?

    Hey,
    Well the load balancing with the BigIP device is really very
    amazing. I think
    what i liked most was swapping out servers when their lease
    was up, through the
    BigIP manager I just stopped all traffic to a server, shut it
    down, plugged in
    the new one and turned traffic back on. It was really very
    easy.
    The SSL stuff still gives me a headache to think about. but
    I should mention I
    no longer work where I was, plus now I'm all .net C# but
    that's a different
    story.
    I think if I was going to do this all again I would not have
    secured the bigIP
    unit. It was nice to buy one SSL cert for all the servers I
    attached rather
    than one per server, but getting the SSL sites to work
    properly was a headache.
    We also use windows file replication where now I would go
    with like a pair of
    Dell MD1000's mirrored for storage and just have tons of ram
    and cpu on the
    front end units. Depends what you want to spend I guess. I
    think the bigIP unit
    we bought was like 20 grand, i think they are cheaper now
    though.
    Hope I helped.

  • How to set up load balancing with overload server on css

    can anyone tell me how to set up a load balancing config on css that will enable me to LB proxy caches and when they have too many connections then LB against an overload proxy-cache.
    Such that when the normal proxy-cache farm is under the ceiling of max connections then the overload server is not used ?
    I don't think redirect or sorry server will do this ?

    see the below configuration,any question,just tell me.
    service proxy-1
    ! below is the real ip of server
    ip address 10.1.1.1
    keepalive type icmp
    active
    service proxy-2
    ip address 10.1.1.2
    keepalive type icmp
    active
    ! enter owner config-mode
    owner proxy
    ! define a content rule,match what you want to load balancing
    content rule-proxy
    ! below is virtual ip,it can be another ip segment
    vip address 10.1.1.50
    add service proxy-1
    add service proxy-2
    protocol any
    advanced-balance sticky-srcip
    active

  • CF 10 Load-Balancing with Remote Instances

    I was reading an article on Clustering/LB/HA using CF8, but have not found any updates for CF10.
    Using VM VirtualBox to setup a few virtual servers, I am looking to setup a load balancing of ColdFusion 10 on 2 remote instances. The goal would be have ColdFusion Cluster Manager be able to point http request to one of the two servers based on load/availability. Not really having a hardware cluster/failover setup, just managing resources on two CF instances instead of a standalone.
    The servers are Windows Server 2008 R2 with IIS7.5 and ColdFusion 10 Enterprise on installed on 3 of these machines. Let's call them CF-LBManager, CF-Web1, and CF-Web 2. In the CF Docs, they show the Cluster Manager adding the local CF instance and "if you want" a remote instance. However, this scenario would require the main instance to be running and not fail for it to direct to the other instance.
    I am trying to set this up now with CF-LBManager as just a manager of the requests coming in. In the Enterprise Manager >> Instance Manager, the local instance is shown and I add the two remote instances with the correct Remote Port, JVM Route, etc. I also made sure the <Cluster>...</Cluster> block was added to the two remote instances (CF-Web1 and CF-Web2) \runtime\conf\server.xml file too, Jetty Services also is running. Now under the Enterprise Manager >> Cluster Manager I add the two remote instances to the cluster, not the local instance on CF-LBManager with Multicast Port and Sticky Sessions enabled. On Submit, I get a green message "You must restart all the server instances and any configured webservers for these changes to take effect.". I go ahead and reboot the servers and come back.
    I now browse to the ColdFusion page as a test on CF-Web1 and CF-Web2 to make sure CF is running properly, they do. I then browse the IP of the CF-LBManager, however it only returns the local IIS web site and not redirect to one of the two cluster members. I am not seeing any message on the coldfusion-out.log on the remote instances. Am I not setting this up correctly or not enabling the Cluster Manager to take over and pass along the requests to those in the cluster?

    Unfortunatley I don't have a lot of experience with CF10 on Windows, but if you are running CF behind IIS I think  you will need to update the Tomcat connector configuraiton to do load balancing. I'm not sure if re-running the wsconfig tool on all of the servers will do this or not, but that is what I would suggest trying first. If that doesn't work you will need to update the Tomcat connector configuraiton manually. You can find more information on load balancing with the Tomcat connector here: http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/generic_howto/loadbalancers.html.

  • CSS Load Balancing with Cookies

    We are trying to load balance 2 backend servers hosted on Websphere with advance balance cookies method.
    Restrictions
    ServerA is unable to accept cookies generated from ServerB.
    ServerA and ServerB are generating random cookies
    Unable to modify cookie string with a constant.
    How can we load balance based on cookies considering the above restrictions?
    We have attempted to do hash based load balancing with cookies but the problem we run into is the servers do not accept cookies generated from another server.
    The configuration we tried is written below:
    service ServerA
    ip address 192.168.10.2
    keepalive type tcp
    keepalive port 80
    active
    service ServerB
    ip address 192.168.20.2
    keepalive type tcp
    keepalive port 80
    active
    content ABC
    url "/*"
    add service ServerA
    string prefix "JSESSIONID="
    advanced-balance cookies
    port 80
    add service ServerB
    string skip-length 5
    string process-length 16
    string operation hash-xor
    protocol tcp
    vip address 172.16.32.1
    active
    Can we change the string prefix to JSESSION instead of JSESSIONID= ?
    The only place the app guys can add a constant string to match on is before the = sign.
    Is it possible for CSS to match on a constant string before = sign e.g below:
    service ServerA
    ip address 192.168.10.2
    keepalive type tcp
    keepalive port 80
    string id567=
    active
    service ServerB
    ip address 192.168.20.2
    keepalive type tcp
    keepalive port 80
    string id123=
    active
    content ABC
    url "/*"
    add service ServerA
    string prefix "JSESSION"
    advanced-balance cookies
    port 80
    add service ServerB
    string skip-length 0
    string process-length 6
    protocol tcp
    vip address 172.16.32.1
    active

    It should work.
    There is no reason for it not to work...
    This is the best method you can have on the CSS for stickyness.
    Get a sniffer trace on the client and server with arrowpoint cookie configured on the CSS and capture a failure so we can see what is going on.
    also send me the config so I can verify everything is ok.
    If you have a service request open with the TAC, you can also give the SR # so I can review what has been done.
    Gilles.

  • Cache and Load Balancing with Oracle APEX Listener

    Hi,
    I intend to use only HTTP access.
    How to implement a Cache and Load Balancing with the Oracle APEX Listener?
    Is it possible to do with the the standalone running APEX Listener?
    Thanks by advance for any tips/documentation/references.
    Kind Regards.

    Hi,
    I think this question is best asked in the APEX Listener forum:
    ORDS, SODA & JSON in the Database
    Kind regards
    Sandro

  • Multihomed eBGP load balancing with 3 ISP's

    We currently peer with 2 ISPs using BGP in an active/failover configuration.  My company wants to move to a 3 ISP model where Internet traffic is split across the 3 providers so that bandwidth is equally distributed on outgoing traffic across our 2 /22 ARIN IP ranges.  This is from our 2 edge switches that have VSS.  
    Within my limited knowledge of BGP, I have determined that we could do load sharing pretty easily by adding multiple default routes and breaking up our /22's into /24 and advertising them that way.  However, I don't think this satisfies the request that downtime must be seamless, should one link drop.  
    Currently, our ISP's advertise default routes.  From the research that I've done, we could get close to load balanced links if we receive full BGP routes and community settings and definitions.  I'm nervous about this because it looks really complicated, and I don't want our AS to turn into a transit AS.  I've been told the same can be accomplished with only partial BGP routes and community settings and definitions.  
    Personally, I think we just need a WAN load balancer.  However, given the request, is there a thread out there that can explain this, or can someone discuss this requested scenario a little bit?  
    Thanks!

    Hi there
    First question would be what is the required reconvergence time for the applications using the Internet? Should an outage occur, when do they lose their state? Once you know that, you then have a target to aim for in terms of recovery
    With regards load-balancing, with BGP we are always talking inbound and outbound.
    The outbound solution is relatively simple - each ISP advertises a default route to your Internet edge router(s). Create an eBGP session from each edge router to the core, advertise the default route and redistribute into the IGP. Ensure the IGP cost to each BGP next hop is equal and you have ECMP for outbound routing.
    Inbound influence is usually via MED (not likely in this case given 3 ISPs), adjusting local-pref in the ISP via BGP EXT communities configured your end, or via AS-PATH prepending for longer prefixes from your /22. Prepending would be simplest, but your unlikely to get an exact inbound traffic split, however a relatively even distribution should be sufficient. 

  • How does load-balancing with WebCache work - is there still a bottleneck?

    Hello,
    We're migrating an old Forms 6i app to 10.1.2.0.2 (apps servers = Redhat Linux), and are starting to consider using WebCache to loadbalance between two application servers.
    My question is this - say we have apps servers A and B, both running Forms and Reports Services. We use Webcache on server A (don't have the luxury of a third apps server...) to load balance between A and B. So all initial requests come into A, which in some cases may then be diverted to start a new Forms session on B.
    For those users whose middle-tier sessions are now running on B - will all network traffic for their Forms session continue to be routed through Webcache on A, then to B, over the course of the session? Or does Webcache somehow shunt the whole connection to be straight between the client PC and server B, for the duration of that Forms session?
    If the former, does that mean that the server hosting Webcache can still be a significant bottleneck for network traffic? Have people found load-balancing with Webcache to be useful..?
    Thanks in advance,
    James

    Hi gudnyc,
    Thanks for posting on Adobe forums.
    For HDPI you do not have to do any It will adjust automatically.
    http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop-elements/using/whats-new.html
    Regards,
    Sandeep

  • Load Balancing With Round Robin

    Hi,
    I have two iAS instances, each on their own box, and one iWS instance
    running on a third box. I have setup the web connector to use round
    robin and added the server weights. I believe that is all that is to it
    to do simple load balancing with iAS. The problem is is that the
    requests only go to one iAS instance. The server weights are 1 and 1.
    Am I missing something here?
    Thanks

    Could be lots of things.
    The most common misconfiguration is testing an application that is deployed "local". This application option effectively disables load balancing.
    Another common mistake is to either not update the configuration of the webconnector (if the webconnector
    has a seperate configuration LDAP) or to not restart
    the webconnector after the configuration change.
    Hope this helps. There's more things we could try, but I'll hope its one of these two easy things.

  • Load balancing with use of router 881.

    Hello,
    I have two MPLS line and i want load balancing with the help of CISCO router 881. is it necessary that i require two router on both location.? if one location have firewall and one location have cisco router 881 then can i do a load balancing or i require two router each on both location ? What are the basic requirement that i need.
    Thanks,
    Kuntal

    Disclaimer
    The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    An 881 should be able to load share across multiple ports.  Many routing protocol support ECMP, including BGP, but you need "special" hidden/secret commands to enable.  EIGRP also supports unequal cost load sharing.
    If an 881 supports OER or PfR, those too will do unequal load sharing, dynamically.

  • Load balancing with A-Gate

    Hi All,
    I wish to configure my single W-Gate (Linux) to load balance with 2 A-Gate (Window). Can anyone help?
    Regards
    Lauran

    Hello Lauran,
    I'm assuming that you already have the ITS working with one AGate server.  To load balance between two you need to install the ITS AGate again on the second server with the same ITS instance name.  Then on the WGate server you will need to modify the ItsRegistryWgate.xml.  Under the <key name="Instances"> you will find a section already for this ITS instance name, like ITS1.  You will need to copy and paste the Agate1 section and make it Agate2, change the Host name and the PortAGate and PortMManager and then save and restart.  The finished section should look like:
    - <key name="ITS1">
    - <key name="Values">
      <value name="Available" type="text">yes</value>
      <value name="Name" type="text">ITS1</value>
      <value name="DocumentRoot" type="text">c:\its1081</value>
      <value name="ServerName" type="text">Apache2 (virtual host: default:1081)</value>
      <value name="NIReceiveRetryCount" type="text">0</value>
      <value name="NIReceiveTimeout" type="text">0</value>
      <value name="NISendTimeout" type="text">0</value>
      </key>
    - <key name="Agates">
    - <key name="Agate1">
      <value name="Host" type="text">Hostname1</value>
      <value name="PortAGate" type="text">sapavw00_ITS1</value>
      <value name="PortMManager" type="text">sapavwmm_ITS1</value>
      <value name="Type" type="text">1</value>
      <value name="SncNameAGate" type="text" />
      <value name="SncNameWGate" type="text" />
      <value name="MultiProcess" type="text">no</value>
      <value name="Available" type="text">yes</value>
      </key>
    - <key name="Agate2">
      <value name="Host" type="text">Hostname2</value>
      <value name="PortAGate" type="text">sapavw00_ITS1</value>
      <value name="PortMManager" type="text">sapavwmm_ITS1</value>
      <value name="Type" type="text">1</value>
      <value name="SncNameAGate" type="text" />
      <value name="SncNameWGate" type="text" />
      <value name="MultiProcess" type="text">no</value>
      <value name="Available" type="text">yes</value>
      </key>
      </key>

Maybe you are looking for

  • Trying to install Adobe Flash: Internet Explorer 9; Windows Vista 32 bit

    During installation process and when prompted, I close IE. However, adobe executable prompts, again, to close IE.  Repeated attempts to "continue" installation result in same message to close IE. I have no Flash versions on my computer. Help!

  • PDF Export problems when viewing with Preview 4.2

    Hi Everyone, I'm an Indesign novice for sure, so this may be fairly basic to a lot of you, but I'm having problems with a document of mine. I've built my portfolio in indesign using PNG images from my book. In Indesign I've applied the gradient feath

  • Subtract value 2 from value 1 in sql

    with cte as select userid, parentid from user_detail where userid = '100002' union all select t.userid, t.parentid from user_detail t inner join cte on cte.userid = t.parentid SELECT (10 - B.AMOUNT) AS DUE FROM cte AS A CROSS APPLY (SELECT SUM(Pairs)

  • Example of PDF with javascript

    We use javascript to customize PDF forms and one of our customers is experiencing performance issues with Adobe Reader 10.  If the problem is unique to our form then I can narrow down my troubleshooting.  But, if our customer accesses another PDF fro

  • How to set a single tab in JTabbedPane invisible

    Hello, I want to set only a single tab invisible out of 9 tabs in JTabbedPane. I can disable the tab but not able to set invisible. Thanking you in advance.