Loading issues after upgrading from MacBook to MacBookPro

I recently updated from a MacBook to a 13 inch MacBookPro 2.53 GHz intel duo processor, 4GB RAM, and about 170GB of free space on my internal hard drive. I am running OS 10.5.7
When I got my MacBookPro I transfered all the data from my MacBook to the new computer.
About one everyone 5-10 minutes, when running Adobe Flash (10,0,22,87) on Safari 4.0.2 or Firefox 3.0.8, and about everyone 20-30 minutes when running programs in Microsoft Office 2008, my computer has excessively long loading times. These loads do not correlate with any CPU intensive activity, they happen during routine internet surfing or word processing.
I did not have this issue with loads times when I was using my old MacBook was had a smaller processor, RAM, and HD. I transfered my HD over when I got my new computer, which makes this more puzzling.
I have restarted my computer multiple times. I have ran a virus scan. I have lurked the forums, but I cannot seem to figure out what is causing the problem. Also, while I have no idea what this does, I repaired the permissions on my hard drive.
Any ideas?

I transfered my HD over when I got my new computer, which makes this more puzzling.
Do you mean that you moved the MacBook's hard drive into the MBP? If you did that, and you didn't reinstall the OS on it from the MBP's discs, then you have an unsuitable OS installation on the MBP now, and that may be at the root of your problem. Even if it isn't, it will eventually lead to other problems.

Similar Messages

Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query

Hi All,
There is a Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query in a report painter.
This query is working fine when executed in 4.7 system where as it is running for more time in ECC6.0.
Select query is on the table COSP.
SELECT (FIELD_LIST)
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_COSP PACKAGE SIZE 1000
        FROM COSP CLIENT SPECIFIED
        WHERE GJAHR IN SELR_GJAHR
          AND KSTAR IN SELR_KSTAR
          AND LEDNR EQ '00'
          AND OBJNR IN SELR_OBJNR
          AND PERBL IN SELR_PERBL
          AND VERSN IN SELR_VERSN
          AND WRTTP IN SELR_WRTTP
          AND MANDT IN MANDTTAB
        GROUP BY (GROUP_LIST).
   LOOP AT I_COSP      .
     COSP                           = I_COSP      .
     PERFORM PCOSP       USING I_COSP-_COUNTER.
     CLEAR: $RWTAB, COSP                          .
     CLEAR CCR1S                         .
   ENDLOOP.
ENDSELECT.
I have checked with the table indexes, they were same as in 4.7 system.
What can be the reson for the difference in execution time. How can this be reduced without adjusting the select query.
Thanks in advance for the responses.
Regards,
Dedeepya.

Hi,
ohhhhh....... lots of problems in select query......this is not the way you should write it.
Some generic comments:
1. never use SELECT
                   endselect.
   SELECT
into table
   for all entries in table
where.
   use perform statment after this selection.
2. Do not use into corresponding fields. use exact structure type.
3. use proper sequence of fields in the where condition so that it helps table go according to indexes.
    e.g in your case
          sequence should be
LEDNR
OBJNR
GJAHR
WRTTP
VERSN
KSTAR
HRKFT
VRGNG
VBUND
PARGB
BEKNZ
TWAER
PERBL
sequence should be same as defined in table.
Always keep select query as simple as possible and perform all other calculations etc. afterwords.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Pranaya

Stability issues after upgrade from 5 to 6.1?

Dear all,
my client plans to upgrade from WLS 5 to 6.1 soon. The application is
an intranet portal with Epicentric and Vignette used as additional
products.
However, some voices say that 6.1 has stability issues. Well, these
statements are rumours and lack any proof or even anecdotal evidence I
have heard of, and therefore it is very difficult to respond
appropriately.
Having said this, my questions are:
- Did any of you have stability issues after upgrading from 5 to 6.1
on Solaris?
- If yes, what were they and how did you solve them (e.g. upgrade to
SP 5)?
- In 1-2 sentences, what is the context of the application?
My goal is to present a evidence that the romoured stability issues
don't exist or/and a list of meastures to avoid/solve them, if any.
Many thanks in advance
Andreas

"Andreas Raab" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
my client plans to upgrade from WLS 5 to 6.1 soon. The application is
an intranet portal with Epicentric and Vignette used as additional
products.
However, some voices say that 6.1 has stability issues. Well, these
statements are rumours and lack any proof or even anecdotal evidence I
have heard of, and therefore it is very difficult to respond
appropriately.
Having said this, my questions are:
- Did any of you have stability issues after upgrading from 5 to 6.1
on Solaris?
- If yes, what were they and how did you solve them (e.g. upgrade to
SP 5)?
- In 1-2 sentences, what is the context of the application?
My goal is to present a evidence that the romoured stability issues
don't exist or/and a list of meastures to avoid/solve them, if any.Hi Andreas,
Normally proving that rumors are true is a responcibility of
rumors suppliers. Reverse does sound to me like a joke.
Regards,
Slava Imeshev
P.S. Current weblogic 6.1 is a stable product.

Issues after Upgrade from Oracle 10.1.0.5 to 10.2.0.5 in Windows Server2003

Good Morning Good People,
I have run in to some issues after upgrading my 10.1.0.5 database to 10.2.0.5. Initially after the firtst upgrade from 10.1.0.5 to 10.2.0.0 one has to run Critical Patch set 4 to get to 10.2.0.5. Well after initial up grade everything worked fine. I could connect to the database from within the server as well as remotely through SQL*PLUS client. However, after completeing the patch I'm still able to connect to the database from within the server, but remotely i get the following error:
ORA-12514 : TNS Listener does not currently know of service requested in connect descriptor.
I also get Error ORA-12505: TNS:listener does not currently know of SID given in connect descriptor The Connection descriptor used by the client was: (description=(address=(host=mcquery2)(protocol=tcp)(port=1521))(connect_data=(sid=mcquery)(server=dedicated)))
I've tried serval different things to trouble shoot the issue but nothing seems to work.
If anyone has run into s similar issue please help. This is ruining my weekend! LOL!
Edited by: user10835577 on Aug 29, 2010 9:15 AM

From the client or the server?
SERVER:
tnsnames.ora:
MCQUERY=
(DESCRIPTION=
(ADDRESS=
(PROTOCOL=TCP)
(HOST=10.36.27.184)
(PORT=1521)
(CONNECT_DATA=
(SERVICE_NAME=MCQUERY)
listener.ora
SID_LIST_LISTENER =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = PLSExtProc)
(ORACLE_HOME = D:\oracle\product\10.1.0\Db_1)
(PROGRAM = extproc)
LISTENER =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = 10.36.27.184)(PORT = 1521))
FROM REMOTE SQLPLUS Client:
tnsnames.ora
MCQUERY=
(DESCRIPTION=
(ADDRESS=
(PROTOCOL=TCP)
(HOST=10.36.27.184)
(PORT=1521)
(CONNECT_DATA=
(SERVICE_NAME=MCQUERY)
listener.ora
SID_LIST_LISTENER =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = PLSExtProc)
(ORACLE_HOME = D:\oracle\product\10.1.0\Client_3)
(PROGRAM = extproc)
LISTENER =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = cotsdot370.cotsdot.dom)(PORT = 1521))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = 10.36.27.184)(PORT = 1521))
Thanks,
Malcolm
Edited by: user10835577 on Aug 29, 2010 12:01 PM

Sorting issue after upgrade from 9i to 10g

Dear all,
It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
Thanks for your help,
M.T.

903714 wrote:
Dear all,
It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
Thanks for your help,
M.T. This is expected behavior in 10g. Oracle will not order the dataset for you unless and until you explicitly specify it.
So without using order by clause in 10g, oracle doesn't guarantee that rows will be ordered.
To go back to old behavior like 9i, you can set a workaround by
alter session set "_newsort_enabled"=false;
Also see MOS - Order Of Data Retrieval Differs after upgrading 9i To 10g [ID 456707.1]

Stability issues after upgrading from OS 10.2.6 to OS 10.2.8

Hey to all the Mac experts,
I'm new to the Macs. I recently purchased a 2nd hand Power Mac G3 Beige Desktop for really cheap to learn and get a better understanding of Macs. It currently has 256 mb ram, G3 300 mhz cpu, 10 gig WD HD, 4.7 gig Mac DVD drive, 10 mb NIC, floppy, original mouse and keyboard, an USB add-on card, and video port adapter to use with SVGA monitors. It came with Mac OS 10.2 Jaguar loaded on and cd's. From the info, this older unit can't support or run 10.3 or 10.4. So, I'm fine with 10.2.
My main concern is issues when I use the Software update feature and upgraded from 10.2.6 to 10.2.8. This MAC should run 10.2.8 according to the specs. After the update and restart, I sometimes get a blank screen, or can't move the mouse, lockups and random keyboard issues. I ended up reinstalling from scratch with just cds. I didn't load any 3rd party software. I reran the software update feature again. Same thing as before. After erasing and reloading a 2nd time. I only did the updates for everything but up to 10.2.8. I searched the apple site and downloaded the updates from 10.2.0 to 10.2.6. So, no problem with that. The only 3rd party software currently installed is Firefox 1.5 and adobe reader 6.01 plus all software updates for Quicktime, Safari, etc.
Now my question is, what is the reason why it can't properly run version 10.2.8? Is there a workaround or solution to this problem? I know I could get by with 10.2.6, but what's the point when it should load and run 10.2.8 according to the specs here?
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=43124
Thanks in advance for any info.
PS> I read about sometimes Macs need a firmware update to properly run Mac OS 10. So, this is the only firmware I found for this MAC and it turns out I don't need it.
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25176
Mac G3 Beige Desktop Mac OS X (10.2.x) 256 mb ram, 10 gig hd, 300 mhz

Hi macsoprano,
Hello
First of all, welcome to the Apple discussions.
I don't think that this is a Firmware issue.
Download the combo updater via this link: Combo Updater
Don't forget repair permissions before and after the update
Disk Repair Permissions
* Good luck ...
Dimaxum

Printing issue after upgrade from 11.5.10.2 to 12.1.3

Hi
I am trying to print the seed reports after upgrade. Text format reports are printing well, the problem is with the XML and RTF format reports, not yet tested the PDF format.
Thanks
Reddy

Hi Hussein,
Application release : 12.1.3
Database Version : 11.2.0.2
OS Version : RHEL 5.5
The problem with the seeded reports only, not yet started testing the custom reports, for the XML/RTF its printing, but the output has lot of junk. If I view the output in the Concurrent request, it looks nice. When I view the file from $APPLCSF/$APPLOUT it has lots of junk, the same way it is printing.
Thanks
Reddy

Loads Issue after Upgrade in Production system

Hi Guys,
Yesterday we did 4.6c to Ecc6.0 upgrade,
After As a BW Team member i activate my BW Source system and Replicate the whole D/S, i Activate all the Transfer rules using RS_TRANSTRU_ACTIVATE_ALL. Then i started Loads through Process Chains but Previously loads are taken 20-40 min max right now it's takeing 3-5hours,
when i verify the detail steps in monitor step still Extractor level only, When i go to the RSA3 in Ecc 6.0 I can see the Data. but here i hav't see the data after 3 hours.
please suggest me wht r the steps i have to do after upgrade...
Thank you,
DST

Hi,
You might want to check your SMQS settings... also monitor closely transaction SM58 in the source system.... I encountered the same thing during upgrade and had to schedule a job every 10mins or so to trigger the push of the IDocs.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Gimmo

User Exit issue after upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0

Hi Experts,
After upgrade we are facing some issues regarding user exit. In 4.6c we have implemented several user exit to do customization in several module like SD,FI and HR. But after upgrade it has been identified that SAP has already provided this functionality in ECC 6.0. Now our problem is when this transactions are called or executed control is going to both custom and standard code. Which took long time to execute and causing performance issue.
Is there any ways to identify which are the functionality SAP has provided in ECC 6.0 so that we can delete our custom user exits.

Hi
List all the user exits which you have modified and check in OSS notes you will get the OSS note with all the details what functionality has been changed. Based on this you can delete or retain the user exits which ever you want.
Regards,
JB

POE Issues After Upgrade from 7.0.240 to 7.6.100

We have a 5508 that has just been upgraded from 7.0.240 to 7.6.100 with many 1142's, 3502's, etc. Our wired network is HP 5406zl's POE on every port and plenty of power available for POE.
As soon as we upgraded our 1142's to 7.6.100 we started getting poe faults on several switchports. The trap indicates an over-current error and the AP will not power up. I can move that same AP to another switch port and some times that will work. If I reboot the switch the faults may clear on those ports, but will reappear on other ports. It is not always the same APs, and not always the same switch ports.
I have tried downgrading back to 7.0 and the errors clear. Obviously I want to be running the newer code for the bug fixes and features. TAC has not given this case any time yet.
The switches report more than enough power being available still on the ports. I can see the ports try to come up, and most of the times the AP will start to power up and come up at 8 watts as it boots, and as soon as the AP is ready to go and starts powering the radios it enters the fault state.
The APs all run in local mode, and I have tried enabling "Pre-standard 802.3af switches. "
Does anyone have any ideas? Something must have changed in the way power is drawn or negotiated.

HI Glenn,
Go for 7.4.121.0 (7.4MR2) version & see if this issue is there ? If not then it may be a bug/issue specific to this latest code. Here is the release notes for this code
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn74mr02.html
Also makesure your WLC FUS also upgraded to 1.7.0.0. See below & keep note this will take 30-40min downtime to your wireless.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/fus_rn_1_7_0_0.html
The version I have given is the one most people including TAC would recommend
HTH
Rasika
**** Pls rate all useful responses ****

Major issues after upgrading from XP to Vista on Qosmio F20

I have recently upgraded from XP to Vista on my Qosmio F20 and have issues. It appears I have lost the ability to change screen resolutions, adjust the volume , brightness etc. Basically I have lost the functions of the laptop. I have also tried updating the BIOS but get the following error message "BiOS updated is not supported OS - Unsupported OS or service pack installed.
This is also making the machine very slow.

Do you have some questions now, or you wrote just a report about your Vista experience on Qosmio F20?
The fact is that Toshiba does not support Vista on this notebook model and because of that you will never have full operating Vista (including Toshiba tools and utilities). For supported notebooks Toshiba has offered special Vista supporting BIOS but for your notebook such BIOS update does not exist.
Sorry! :(

Bluetooth issue after upgrading from windows 8.1 to windows 10

i upgraded from windows 8.1 to windows 10 , The experience was really nice and windows 10 work beautifully of my system. But the only thing is i am not able to find Bluetooth in my system. May be some driver issue. I have troubleshooted many times but the problem as not been solved . So any one can please help me on this.

On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 10:34:40 +0000, Field Commander A9 wrote:
In-place upgrading from Windows 8.1 to Windows 10 will cause all desktop internet browsers to be unable to open any non-local web pages. You'll have to use netsh to reset the winsock stack to fix this.
Not necessarily. I've upgraded several systems here, ranging from tablets
to laptops to virtual machines with a combination of IE, Chrome, and
FireFox and I've not experienced this on a single system. Also, your post
is the first time I've seen this issue reported in the forums.
Paul Adare - FIM CM MVP
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard. -- BSD
fortune
Nah, the problem is that it doesn't have enough chlorine. -- Lionel in ASR
It also lacks an undertow for the weak ones. -- Joe Creighton in ASR

Issue after upgrade from oracle 10.2.0.4 to 11g (11.1.0.6.0)

hello
After upgrade to 11g we have problem with dbms_workload_replay package it has error Error(1): PLS-00753: malformed or corrupted wrapped unit in body and can't be compiled . It is wrapped so we can't find error. We run utlrp.sql but no results.
Any idea ??
THX

Then it looks similar to bug 6651232
May I suggest you get in touch with Oracle support for this?

Load Error after upgrade from 7.0 to 7.01

Hi all,
After the upgrade of our BW Database from 7.0 to 7.01, Iu2019m doing some loads test and for the load with BW DataSource, I get a short dump when I run the InfoPackage.
"MESSAGE_TYPE_X" " "
"SAPLRSATREE" or "LRSATREEF28"
"RSATREE_START_ACTIVATION"
I replicate all DataSource but I still have the same error when I try to load.
Do you have idea to solve this issue?
Thanks in advance!
KR

Hello,
Please review SAP note below:
671562 - Dump when you activate data in the ODS object
From note - 671562 solution part:
Delete the red or yellow requests from the ODS object before you start
to activate the data. You could say that the MESSAGE_TYPE_X dump is
deliberate because incorrect requests cannot be activated.
Please be aware that note 671562 is also available for BW 700/701.
Best Regards
Barry

Report printing issue after upgrading from LV 8.2 to LV 2009

Hello,
I am upgrading an application from LabView 8.2 to LabView 2009. It uses the Report Generation Toolkit to create reports based on Word templates. The reports are pretty complicated, with a lot of bookmarks, tables, and graphs, but only one page long.
The reports are generated correctly. However when sent to printing (using Print report.vi), the printer goes into spooling status and if you are patient enough you may get the report after at least 7 minutes. I tried changing the printer setting to "Print directly to the printer", as per an old KnowledgeBase article. No luck. I have installed a local printer. No luck again.
If I close the LabView application while the printer is shown in spooling status, the report prints right away, every time.
Never had this issue in LabView 8.2. On that machine I had Office XP. Now I have Office 2007...
I do not get any error whatsoever, and I cannot figure out where the solution may be.
I have one single report that prints right away every time I try. Coincidence or not, this is the only one that has no tables to print. It has graph though and plenty of bookmarks.
I have exhausted all the ideas on how to deal with this situation, and I must find a solution ASAP. Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.

Brandon,
Thanks for your input.
Not sure how I can use it to narrow down the problem though. I ran it, and I see that the printers are correctly identified, the default one is correctly found, however absolutely nothing is being printed out (I typed a text in the string control, and the Print control was on).
Everything runs with no errors. I would prefer to see a bunch of errors ...

Loading issues after upgrading from MacBook to MacBookPro

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for