Loadrunner 12 for Mobile Performance Testing

I need to know does HP Load runner or UFT supports telecom protocols such as
MML
SMPP
DCC
SFTP
SOAP
can it support telecom apps
SMS
MMS
testing calls etc.. If yes then how?

Hi Marc,
Have a look at tx. R3AR2 / R3AR3 / R3AR4 to load data from CRM to the CDB (and further to the mobile clients). You should be able to schedule the creation of such data loads also as a job: e.g. if you define a request for 1 BP and start this every 3 seconds, this would be equivalent to a BP change every 3 seconds. The same is true for sales orders or activities.
An alternative would be to use the ASCII Adapter (see help.sap.com) on this to mass-generate also BDocs.
I am not a Windows / network guy, so I cannot say how to measure performance here. But nevertheless you should have a look at commstation behaviour and also client behaviour if you execute such tests, as esp. client data processing is taking very long times if there is too many data sent to the clients.
Hope this helps,
Kai

Similar Messages

Does Apple provide any certification for Mobile Application testing (iOS)

Does Apple provide any certification for Mobile Application testing (iOS)
Kindly share the details of any Mobile Application testing certification provided by Apple.

I'm not aware of any testing done by Apple except as part of the app approval process:
https://developer.apple.com/appstore/resources/approval/index.html
If you have questions about the review process, though, you can contact Apple via the contact links on that page.
Regards.

Besides LoadRunner, any other SAP Performance Test tool?

Hi, Dear All:
I'm doing some planning for the SAP performance test. But our budget is very limited. It seems my company could not afford LR. LoadRunner took over 95% of this market. Beside LR, I heard Worksoft Certify is another option. Is there any other tool or open source tool?
Thank you all so much in advance.

Hello,
If you are looking for simulating load using minimalist tools, a crude way to do this would be configuring Ecatt scripts and running them from multiple machines
But I think it doesn't work for web based transactions.
Regards,
Siddhesh

[Ann] FirstACT 2.2 released for SOAP performance testing

Empirix Releases FirstACT 2.2 for Performance Testing of SOAP-based Web Services
FirstACT 2.2 is available for free evaluation immediately at http://www.empirix.com/TryFirstACT
Waltham, MA -- June 5, 2002 -- Empirix Inc., the leading provider of test and monitoring
solutions for Web, voice and network applications, today announced FirstACT™ 2.2,
the fifth release of the industry's first and most comprehensive automated performance
testing tool for Web Services.
As enterprise organizations are beginning to adopt Web Services, the types of Web
Services being developed and their testing needs is in a state of change. Major
software testing solution vendor, Empirix is committed to ensuring that organizations
developing enterprise software using Web Services can continue to verify the performance
of their enterprise as quickly and cost effectively as possible regardless of the
architecture they are built upon.
Working with organizations developing Web Services, we have observed several emerging
trends. First, organizations are tending to develop Web Services that transfer a
sizable amount of data within each transaction by passing in user-defined XML data
types as part of the SOAP request. As a result, they require a solution that automatically
generates SOAP requests using XML data types and allows them to be quickly customized.
Second, organizations require highly scalable test solutions. Many organizations
are using Web Services to exchange information between business partners and have
Service Level Agreements (SLAs) in place specifying guaranteed performance metrics.
Organizations need to performance test to these SLAs to avoid financial and business
penalties. Finally, many organizations just beginning to use automated testing tools
for Web Services have already made significant investments in making SOAP scripts
by hand. They would like to import SOAP requests into an automated testing tool
for regression testing.
Empirix FirstACT 2.2 meets or exceeds the testing needs of these emerging trends
in Web Services testing by offering the following new functionality:
1. Automatic and customizable test script generation for XML data types – FirstACT
2.2 will generate complete test scripts and allow the user to graphically customize
test data without requiring programming. FirstACT now includes a simple-to-use XML
editor for data entry or more advanced SOAP request customization.
2. Scalability Guarantee – FirstACT 2.2 has been designed to be highly scalable to
performance test Web Services. Customers using FirstACT today regularly simulate
between several hundred to several thousand users. Empirix will guarantee to
performance test the numbers of users an organization needs to test to meet its business
needs.
3. Importing Existing Test Scripts – FirstACT 2.2 can now import existing SOAP request
directly into the tool on a user-by-user basis. As a result, some users simulated
can import SOAP requests; others can be automatically generated by FirstACT.
Web Services facilitates the easy exchange of business-critical data and information
across heterogeneous network systems. Gartner estimates that 75% of all businesses
with more than $100 million in sales will have begun to develop Web Services applications
or will have deployed a production system using Web Services technology by the end
of 2002. As part of this move to Web Services, "vendors are moving forward with
the technology and architecture elements underlying a Web Services application model,"
Gartner reports. While this model holds exciting potential, the added protocol layers
necessary to implement it can have a serious impact on application performance, causing
delays in development and in the retrieval of information for end users.
"Today Web Services play an increasingly prominent but changing role in the success
of enterprise software projects, but they can only deliver on their promise if they
perform reliably," said Steven Kolak, FirstACT product manager at Empirix. "With
its graphical user interface and extensive test-case generation capability, FirstACT
is the first Web Services testing tool that can be used by software developers or
QA test engineers. FirstACT tests the performance and functionality of Web Services
whether they are built upon J2EE, .NET, or other technologies. FirstACT 2.2 provides
the most comprehensive Web Services testing solution that meets or exceeds the changing
demands of organizations testing Web Services for performance, functionality, and
functionality under load.”
Learn more?
Read about Empirix FirstACT at http://www.empirix.com/FirstACT. FirstACT 2.2 is
available for free evaluation immediately at http://www.empirix.com/TryFirstACT.
Pricing starts at $4,995. For additional information, call (781) 993-8500.

Simon,
I will admit, I almost never use SQL Developer. I have been a long time Toad user, but for this tool, I fumbled around a bit and got everything up and running quickly.
That said, I tried the new GeoRaptor tool using this tutorial (which is I think is close enough to get the jist). http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/georaptor/index.php?title=A_Gentle_Introduction:_Create_Table,_Metadata_Registration,_Indexing_and_Mapping
As I stumble around it, I'll try and leave some feedback, and probably ask some rather stupid questions.
Thanks for the effort,
Bryan

A quick counting loop for a performance test

Hi all. I'm writing this small performance test using the add method of an arraylist. How would I wrap a for (or while) loop around this code so that it runs 1000 times, averages the total times of all the tests, and then prints the average out? Thanks.
startTime = System.nanoTime();
for(int i = 0; i< last.length; i++ ){
arrayListLast.add(last);
stopTime = System.nanoTime();
totalTime = stopTime-startTime;

What part are you having trouble with?
Do you not know how to repeat something a certain number of times?
Do you not know how to compute an average?
Do you not know how to print something out?

Looking for a Performance testing tool

We want to stress test our multiserver Adobe Connect before putting into production. HP tool was not successful. Any Recommendations on tool and method?

Cameron,
Thanks for your input! Sounds like you are probably using these
products.
I saw the PerformAssure demo. Their GUI is very slick!! PerformAssure
does some cool stuff like comparing EJB metrics with system metrics
and were able to show me the EJB method that was causing a problem
with a petstore application.
I heard about this new tool from a company called Performant
(http://www.performant.com). I am signed up for a demo with these
folks. Will let you all know what I find.
I looked at Wily site and didn't persue them as they seem to be
deployable in the production environment. Our application is not live
yet, but we want to be able to make sure it can handle good load ;)
Thanks!
--N
"Cameron Purdy" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
I haven't had a chance yet to look at Sitraka's software, but Precise
Indepth/J2EE and Wily Introscope are both pretty popular with Weblogic, and
I think they both do a good job of what they do.
Peace,
Cameron Purdy
Tangosol, Inc.
http://www.tangosol.com/coherence.jsp
Tangosol Coherence: Clustered Replicated Cache for Weblogic
"Neil" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
Hello All!
I need help! I am trying to find out which of the tools is better
suited for me to be able to do performance testing of an application
under load.
I am looking for a tool that can provide me detailed application
performance metrics. Seems like both Insight and Perform Assure can do
this job for me.
If any of you have had experience with using performance tools such as
Prescise Insight or Sitraka's Perform Assure I would appreciate any
input you might have on your usage experience of these tools.
Also if you know of any other tools that might provide similar
information such as the above tools, that would be really helpful.
Thanks a bunch!
Neil.

HP loadrunner report for database performance

Hi Team,
client testing team gave us a report for database, from load runner and asked if the database load testing parameters is correct on the basis of below mentioned 4 parameters. I have also attached report here for your reference. please help me to analyze and let me know what is the minimum and maximum value for these parameters. Thanks.
bytes received via SQL*Net from client
bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
CPU used by this session
SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
Scale
Measurement
Graph Minimum
Graph Average
Graph Maximum
Graph Std. Deviation
1.00E-06
bytes received via SQL*Net from client (V$SYSSTAT 1/RM_Q) (absolute):
70175856636
71089487223
71998425926
622767259.2
1.00E-06
bytes sent via SQL*Net to client (V$SYSSTAT 1/RM_Q) (absolute):
70903049507
71974218479
73016616305
721035721.7
1.00E-06
CPU used by this session (V$SYSSTAT 1/RM_Q) (absolute):
22273715.16
22679322.52
23057004.4
265680.491
1.00E-06
SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client (V$SYSSTAT 1/RM_Q) (absolute):
76493132.84
78422403.32
80169678.32
1244089.29
Regards,
ankit

You can Generate AWR(Automatic Workload Repository) and ADDM(Automatic Database Diagnostic Monitor) Reports to see the performance.
They are similar to staspack report with more information.

SAP Performance Testing - Manual or Automated?

Our organization is attempting to develop a regular performance testing effort. Everything wehave read points to using a tool, such as LoadRunner, to do performance testing. However, we're just starting and simply want to baseline several transactions, jobs, programs, etc (less than 30 items). We have tools to monitor the backend results and grab metrics, but no tools to automate the testing itself. Does anyone do their performance testing manually? What are some advantages to doing this?

Hi Yogi,
I think HP LoadRunner is one of the best tools for SAP performance testing. I did it for many years. It is now included with Solution Manager. Here is the link for for HP Mercury regarding performance testing.
https://h10078.www1.hp.com/cda/hpms/display/main/hpms_content.jsp?zn=bto&cp=1-11-126_4000_100__
Please check this site as well, it has lot of valuable information.
http://www.wilsonmar.com/1loadrun.htm
Regards, Nabi.

Performance Testing - Upgrade from 4.6B to ECC6.0

Hi,
We are doing an upgrade from SAP 4.6B to ECC6.0. I would like to know what would be the best approach for doing a performance test in an upgrade project. More specifically,
1. What are the main components that need to be tested for performance?
2. What are the important transaction codes/external applications (if any) that can be used to do performance testing in both 4.6B and ECC6.0? (ST05 or ST30 or something else?)
3. Any best practice recommended by SAP for doing performance tests?
Thanks in Advance,
Reena

> We are doing an upgrade from SAP 4.6B to ECC6.0. I would like to know what would be the best approach for doing a performance test in an upgrade project. More specifically,
>
> 1. What are the main components that need to be tested for performance?
Those components you use.
> 2. What are the important transaction codes/external applications (if any) that can be used to do performance testing in both 4.6B and ECC6.0? (ST05 or ST30 or something else?)
What is "important" for you?
Markus

Performance Test - Massive data generation

I would like to generate a massive quantity of date in SAP ERP, to be extracted by SAP BW, in an effort to create a baseline Volume of 1-2 TB of data for a performance Test Activity in BW.
We're investigating tools like Quest's DataFactory which generates date directly on the Oracle Tables.
Does anyone have experiences with such activities or scenarios.

Hi,
on the search for another tool i found this one
http://www.turbodata.ca/help/testdatageneratoroverview.htm
Claudius

Performance test planning: timing

Hi folks,
I'm wondering if anyone has suggestions or input on the timing of test planning specific to performance testing. In particular, how far in advance is it recommended that performance test planning would begin in reference to the intended test window(s)

Hi Jack,
My preference is to start planning for a performance test as soon as possible, even before there is an application to test.
The first stage in planning should be an analysis of how the application will be used. This information can be gathered from a business plan if the application is new, or from site usage metrics from tools like Omniture or Web Trends if the application is presently deployed.
From the business plan or metrics you can begin to work out the key transactions (most heavily used and most business critical), as well as planning how users will execute those transaction (what percentages, what think times, etc).
Then as the test date gets closer and the application becomes available/stable/etc you can begin to flesh out the details of the plan. But the overall goals, analysis and high level planning can begin very early in the development cycle.
CMason
Senior Consultant - eLoadExpert
Empirix

MSI Z97 GAMING 3 Review--Performance Testing

After the previous hardware and software introduction, I believe Z97 GAMING 3 will meet gamers’ expectation.
Z97 GAMING 3 integrated with Killer E2200 LAN, Audio Boost 2, M.2 interface and the normal array of connections,
It is truly a good gaming motherboard. Could all these features offer great performance and a good experience?
Today I will test the performance of Z97 GAMING 3 and how good it is.
MSI Z97 GAMING 3 Testing
My test platform is MSI Z97 GAMING 3, Intel ® Core i7-4770K and MSI GeForce GTX 750 graphics card. The test
consists of two parts:
CPU Performance: Super PI, PC Mark Vantage and Cinebench R11.5.
GAMING Performance: 3DMARK 11, Evil 6 Benchmark and FFXI Benchmark.
Test Part 1
CPU : Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.5 GHz
CPU Cooler : Thermaltake TT-8085A
Motherboard : MSI Z97 GAMING 3
RAM : Corsair DDR 3-1600 4GB X 2
PSU : Cooler Master 350W
OS : Windows 7 64 bit
Basic performance testing (CPU setting by default)
CPU Mark Score : 679.
Super PI 32M Result – 8m53.897s.
Graphics Performance Testing：3DMark 11
3DMark 11 is designed to measure PC’s performance. It makes extensive use of all the new features in DirectX 11
including Tessellation, Compute Shader and Multi-threading.
Intel ® HD4600 iGPU in 3DMark 11 Basic mode testing, the results is X385 Score.
Performance mode test score is P1511 .
System Performance：PCMark Vantage
PCMark Vantage is a PC analysis and benchmarking tool consisting of a mix of applications such as based and
synthetic tests that measure system performance.
From the test results, the score of Z97 GAMING 3 with Intel ® HD4600 iGPU is 11,946.
MSI GeForce GTX 750 Testing
Test Part 2
CPU : Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.5 GHz
CPU Cooler : Thermaltake TT-8085A
Motherboard : MSI Z97 GAMING 3
Graphics Card：MSI GeForce GTX 750
RAM : Corsair DDR 3-1600 4GB X 2
PSU : Cooler Master 350W
OS : Windows 7 64 bit
Graphics Performance Testing：3DMark 11
Z97 GAMING 3 with GeForce GTX 750 the test scores is X1653 in 3DMark 11 basic test mode, The performance
mode test score is P5078.
System Performance：PC Mark Vantage
From the test results, Z97 GAMING 3 with GeForce GTX 750 scores 11,518.
System Performance：Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench is the software developed by MAXON Cinema 4D. Cinebench could test CPU and GPU performance with
different processes at the same time. For the CPU part, Cinebench test the CPU performance by displaying a HD 3D
scene. For the GPU part, Cinebench test GPU performance based on OpenGL capacity.
Main Processor Performance (CPU) - The test scenario uses all of your system's processing power to render a photorealistic
3D scene. Graphics Card Performance (OpenGL) - This procedure uses a complex 3D scene depicting a car chase which
measures the performance of your graphics card in OpenGL mode.
In Cinebench R11.5 test, MSI Z97 GAMING 3 with GeForce GTX 750 multi-core test is 6.87pts; OpenGL score is 73.48 fps.
Z97 GAMING 3 with HD 4600 and GeForce GTX 750 in the GAME Benchmark Test
For game performance testing, I will use Resident Evil 6 and FFXI Benchmark with the same platform.
Evil 6 Benchmark
CPU: Core i7-4770K
Game resolution setting: 1920X1080
Other setting: Default
In the Z97 GAMING 3 with Intel® HD4600 iGPU platform, score:1175 (Rank D)
In the Z97 GAMING 3 with GeForce GTX 750 platform, score: 5874 (Rank A)
I use Fraps tool to record FPS status during benchmark testing.The Z97 GAMING 3 with GeForce GTX 750 average
FPS is 202. The Z97 GAMING 3 with Intel® HD4600 iGPU average FPS is 32.
FFXIV Benchmark
CPU: Core i7-4770K
Game resolution setting: 1920X1080
Other setting: Default
The 1920X1080 resolution, Intel® HD4600 iGPU score is only 910.
However, the GeForce GTX 750 testing score is 4167. According to the official classification system, the score
between 3000 to 4499 means high performance.
I use Fraps tool to recorded FPS status during benchmark testing.
the GeForce GTX 750 average FPS is 111. Intel® HD4600 iGPU average FPS is 19.
Test Summary
MSI Z97 GAMING 3 is not very expensive. It has many features which are specially designed for gaming experience
and good performance of benchmarks. Even in 1920x1200 resolution and high quality display setting, Z97 GAMING 3
with Intel Core i7-4770K and MSI GeForce GTX 750 can easily handle any kind of games. The FPS of this system is
higher than 60 and users will enjoy no lag as gaming. It is really a good and afforadable chioce for gamers.

Thx for the sharing, since there are not much reviews about Z97 GAMING 3.

Inline performance testing

Hello,
I'm looking for a performance testing product that I can run inline with an antivirus product to guage the impact on performance while a full scan is running. I've looked into software like PCMark7 and SiSandra but it's not quite what I'm looking for. Your suggestions are greatly appreciated!
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Dear Customer,
Testing application with load runner sometimes generates some undesirable results.
This could be mainly due to algorithm you are following for load runner scripts. There might be issue of load runner inducing the sequence of actions without giving think time to application and hence further scripts might be failing.
I would suggest, have some think time/delay in your load runner scripts and see if that helps.
I hope it helps.
Best Regards,
Chetan

RMS performance testing using HP Loadrunner

Hi,
We are currently planning on how to do our performance testing of Oracle Retail. We are planning to use HP Loadrunner and use different virtual users for Java, GUI, webservices and database requests. Have anyone here done performance testing in RMS using HP Loadrunner and what kind of setup did you use?
Any tips would be greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Gustav

Hi Gustav
How is your performance testing of Oracle Retail ? Did you get good results ?
I need to start a RMS/RPM performance testing project and I would like to know how to implement an appropriated structure . Any informations about servers , protocols , tools used to simulate a real production environment would be very appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Roberto

SAP performance test, stress test using HP LoadRunner

Hi experts,
Our project is going to Go live soon, customer want to ensure about performance of SAP system and require some testing.
I am preparing HP LoadRunner script and perform a most complex scenario for stress test. But with performance test, we cannot perform because we do not have enough transaction data
Please advice me some solution for this case
Thanks & Best Regards,
Luong Doan

Hello,
If you are looking for simulating load using minimalist tools, a crude way to do this would be configuring Ecatt scripts and running them from multiple machines
But I think it doesn't work for web based transactions.
Regards,
Siddhesh

Loadrunner 12 for Mobile Performance Testing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for