Lobby Ambassador Managment of Users that have expired.

Hi there all :)
When you set users up on LA and you set a user to a "controller list", the entry on the listing always shows the account as active from the front menu even if the time has expired.
You then go into the account and you can see the date has expired, and if you test the account, yes, you cant login.
Is this a bug?
I am running WCS version 4.2.62.11.
Also, I would like a function on LA to allow me to delete all expired users in one go. Is this possible?
As the above indicates that the users is not expired but active, at the moment, you have to go into every account, check the expiry date and then delete the account one by one.
Painful?
Many thx indeed,
Ken

Hey Ken,
Is it time for a beer yet??
In answer to your first question, I think you are seeing this bug;
CSCsk17497 Bug Details
D3WCS:lobby ambassador-guest user account expiry not shown clearly
Symptom:
After successful scheduling the Guest account, the detail page for the created account doesn't show the expiry time details.
Conditions:
This condition arrives only when the browsed account is the scheduled account.
Workaround:
The detail page has the 'start' and 'end' time selection, which can be used for the expiry detail.
Further Problem Description:
Status
Fixed
Severity
3 - moderate
Last Modified
Any Time
Product
Cisco Wireless Control System
Technology
1st Found-In
4.2(47.0)
Fixed-In
5.0(28.0)
Hope this helps bud!
Rob

Similar Messages

Portlet to display all users that have manager defined as currently displayed user profile

I need to create a portlet such that when a user finds a user's profile they see all of the users defined with manager set to the value of the profile user's employeeNumber.
Example:
(Think a directory of employees)
John searches and finds user named Jack. He sees Jack's name, phone number, address, etc in the General Information section. Then he also sees a section (Portlet) that lists all of Jack's direct reports. John clicks on one of Jack's direct reports (Sam), to find this person's phone number.
The Direct Reports portlet would be a search portlet that finds all of the users that have a mangerID property set to the value of Jack's employeeNumber property and displays them sorted by LastName.
I need some direction on where to start for this.
It seems like I need to use the Plumtree Server API in order to search for all of the user objects and sort them on a particular property, .e.g IPTObjectManager.Query Method (Int32, Int32, Int32, Int32, Int32, Object[][])
A crawler seems out because, I guess that would require creating a folder for every user in the system? If I create a single folder I would need a binary tree structure to the folder. (Has anybody done this?)
I am concerned about the performance related to performing this search each time a user examines a user's profile.
Can somebody direct me to an example of a search "Portlet"? All of the examples I see are of searching external information like Google, or use PRC (do not see how that would be implemented in a portlet), or use EDK (external and does not seem to be able to do this).

You don't need one workflow per user when a filtered view can do this for you. If the manager's list is the parent calendar, I'm assuming that he'll be at least using the person look-up column.
Whether this feeds through the MyCalendar or stays where it is, you can use the [Me] parameter within the filter on a new view. This will then return the assigned holiday filtering against the account that is logged in.
Steven Andrews
SharePoint Business Analyst: LiveNation Entertainment
Blog: baron72.wordpress.com
Twitter: Follow @backpackerd00d
My Wiki Articles:
CodePlex Corner Series
Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves (or helps) your problem.

We have two users that have been using Creative Cloud for almost a year. Recently, sometime in the last 4ish weeks, the users can no longer run Creative Cloud apps. (Yes, our subscription is paid.) Error simply says administrator access is required

We have two users that have been using Creative Cloud for almost a year. Recently, sometime in the last 4ish weeks, the users can no longer run Creative Cloud apps. (Yes, our subscription is paid.) Error simply says administrator access is required to install. The apps have already been installed. The users cannot run them unless they are in the local admin group.Using "Run as admin" does not work. It gives the same error.
I have opened a case with adobe support and was basically told to suck it up and put the users in the admin group. Actually, what was said was that it is "mandated that the users have administrative rights".
There are a couple of things wrong with this. It was working for both users until recently - a recent required creative cloud update. The users have never been local admins yet the apps were working (poorly, but working).
We are in an enterprise environment and users simply do not have administrative rights on the computers.
I have changed permissions on all adobe folders, granting users or authenticated users modify or full control rights, did the same in whatever Adobe registry HKLM keys I could find. Nothing has allowed the users to run the apps - unless they are put in the local admin group.
Someone has to have a fix for this. Adobe apps have proved to have far too many vunerabilities to even entertain the idea of elevating user rights. I can't imagine that enterprise environments are allowing this.
Any help or suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Jeff,
Thank you for your response. The users in question are "standard" domain users. We do not reduce users permissions below the standard level.
The apps do not load with their current standard user permissions.
The thing that makes this odd, is that up until recently they did this issue with cloud apps. The only way I can make it work for them now is to put them in the local administrator group on their pc's - which is not going to happen.
This is what they now see. As I said before, this was not a problem up until recently they would see all their available apps. If I put them in the local admin group the apps are listed without having to install. Everything is there, just not accessible to the user.

Enumerate the users that have access to a particular directory

Hi, my name is Jennifer and I have been searching for an answer to my problem through several blogs. The problem is that I have a Directory of which I want to not only retrieve the users\groups that have access to it but also enumerate through the groups
to list actual users. The groups part is the main issue here. If I use get-acl, I can return any number of particular Active Directory groups that have access, however, I need to list the users inside this group and get-acl will not output an object I can
work with. I thought I could do something like this (which I may have seen on this forum before):
get-acl "C:\NestedGroupTest" | %{$_.access} \ ft -property identityreference
This will return the groups\users that have access. Example:
Domain\OU
NT Authority\system
Builtin\users
ETC...
I have tried exporting this output to a file and then trying to use get-adgroupmember (which obviously will not work on the non-AD groups) but the objects are of the wrong type so basically nothing in the Active Directory module will work...
This seems like such a simple issue but it is causing me grief to no end...please help

I can't guarantee that this will work in all cases, but it seems to work on my test domain. Warning: it's very slow and inefficient. It requires
this module (get the 3.0 test version), but you can modify the foreach block's code somewhat to get it to work with Get-Acl.
Get-Item C:\NestedGroupTest | Get-AccessControlEntry | ForEach-Object { $PropertyNames = $null }{
if (-not $PropertyNames) {
# We need to copy the property. This will get a list
# of the properties on each ACE when it encounters
# the first ACE (since the rest of this is so ineffecient,
# we can feel good that we saved some work by doing this)
$PropertyNames = $_ | Get-Member -MemberType Properties | select -exp Name
# Create a new hashtable that will be used to create a PSObject
$NewObjectProps = @{}
foreach ($CurrentProperty in $PropertyNames) {
$NewObjectProps.$CurrentProperty = $_.$CurrentProperty
# Check to see if this SID belongs to an AD group
Write-Verbose ("Current principal: {0}" -f $_.Principal)
try {
$Group = Get-ADGroup -Filter { SID -eq $_.SecurityIdentifier } -ErrorAction Stop
catch {
# Write a warning or something?
if ($Group) {
Write-Verbose " -> Group, so looking up members"
$Users = $Group | Get-ADGroupMember -Recursive | select @{N="Principal"; E={$_.SID.Translate([System.Security.Principal.NTAccount])}}, @{N="SecurityIdentifier"; E={$_.SID}}
else {
Write-Verbose " -> Not an AD group"
$Users = $_ | select Principal, SecurityIdentifier
# Go through each user/non-translated group, modify two
# hashtable properties, and create the new PSObject
$Users | ForEach-Object {
$NewObjectProps.SecurityIdentifier = $_.SecurityIdentifier
$NewObjectProps.Principal = $_.Principal
$NewObject = New-Object PSObject -Property $NewObjectProps
# This will make the new object show the module's custom formatting:
$NewObject.pstypenames.Insert(0, "PowerShellAccessControl.Types.AdaptedAce")
$NewObject
That should resemble the output that Get-AccessControlEntry would give you, but AD groups have been translated to users. If you pipe that to Export-CSV, you'd have plenty of information for each ACE, including the path, principal, security identifier, access
mask, etc. You could also pipe that to Select-Object and just ask for certain properties (try it with these properties: Path, Principal, AccessMask, AccessMaskDisplay, AppliesTo).
You can also use the Get-AccessControlEntry function's parameters to do some filtering on the ACEs that are returned (maybe you only want ACEs with FullControl, or ACEs that were not inherited...)
Give it a shot and let me know if it works for you. If you need more explanation of what's going on in the foreach-object process block, let me know and I'll try to help. It can be modified to work with version 2.1 of my module, and with Get-Acl.

PowerShell - List all users that have access to a particular SPLIstItem

Hi there,
In PowerShell - how to list all users that have access to a particular SPLIstItem?
Thanks so much in advance.

Hi frob,
According to your description, my understanding is that you want to list all users who have access to a particular SharePoint list item via PowerShell.
You can use the following PowerShell command:
$web = Get-SPWeb http://sp/sites/First
$list=$web.Lists["listV2"]
$item=$list.Items | where {$_['ID'] -eq 1}
$item | Select -ExpandProperty RoleAssignments |Select {$_.Member.DisplayName}, {$_.Member.LoginName}, RoleDefinitionBindings
In the above command, you need to change the web URL to your site's URL, change “listV2” to the name of your list, and change the ‘1’ to the ID of the list item.
The result looks like:
Best Regards,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

Assigning View permission to all the users that have been selected in contact selector - SP 2010, InfoPath 2010

I have a SharePoint InfoPath 2010 browser form with item level security. Only submitter
and approvers has access to the form. This form contains a people picker that is populated with the names of attendees
for the meeting they attended (which
I am able to store in Field2 below). I want to allow attendees to be able to view (grant view permission) the InfoPath form. Field 2 has the users in form of domain\user1;domain\user2; etc. Following the below step, I am getting error when I ADD or REPLACE
permission on current item. How do I go about assigning view permission to all the users that have been selected in contact selector?
Jitu

Hi ,
i understand that the text box and the people picker hold multiple user names and you want to grant user permission based on the user in the text box.
I have a test based on your description,the results are: When there are multiple users in the text box, the workflow will throw an error'Error Occurred'.It is the same with the people picker column.
You need to limit the peopel picker to only allow to select one user,in this way the text box will only hold one user.Then you can use the people picker or the text box to grant user permission.
Thanks,
Entan Ming
Entan Ming
TechNet Community Support

NEED TO DETERMINE USERS THAT HAVE LOGGED IN WITH A SPECIFIC ROLE

I have a requirement to determine which users have logged in with a specific
role or accessing a specific application. I know I can use the
ORASSO.WWSSO_AUDIT_LOG_TABLE_T table to see the users that have logged in, but
need to know which table to join with in order to determine which group that a
user belongs to. It would also be nice to figure out which users are accessing
a given application.
We are running AS 9.0.4.2 with ORASSO database 9.0.1.5.
Can you identify which tables I will need to use to satisfy my requirement?
Thanks, Mike

Thanks! I modified this slightly to get what I needed but I didn't think that I could get this from dba_tab_privs. You were a huge help!
select table_name, grantee
from dba_tab_privs
where
table_name in ('UTL_FILE', 'UTL_TCP', 'UTL_HTTP', 'UTL_SMTP', 'DBMS_LOB', 'DBMS_SYS_SQL', 'DBMS_JOB', 'DBMS_BACKUP_RESTORE')
and privilege='EXECUTE'
order by table_name;

How to Use PowerShell to Delete FIM Users That Have a Null attribute name

FIM Community Information Center Article
Wiki Page:
How to Use PowerShell to Delete FIM Users That Have a Null <attribute name>
Go to the FIM Community Information Center
Mike Crowley | MVP
My Blog --
Planet Technologies

Have you run side-by-side metrics on this?
I've run the Delete Object method and your script against similar data sets and yours appears to take a fair bit longer. I'd have to re-run in identical circumstances, a few times, to really say for sure, but my initial impression is that it will take hours
longer.
I guess the point is somewhat moot anyway, as for me the bit that generally takes longest is the actual query, rather than the deletions.
Boy how I wish I could just enter something into the FIM Portal directly that would blast out a bunch of users matching a query. One day...
FIMSpecialist.com | MCTS: FIM 2010 | Now Offering
ECMA1->ECMA2 Upgrade Services

I am considering installing the latest version of OS X Mountain Lion but am concerned by the number of users that have had severe problems. Has Apple sorted this out?

I am considering installing the latest version of OSX Mountain Lion but am concerned by the number of users that have had severe problems. Has Apple sorted this out?

As I told you, you have to do some steps before upgrading to OS X Mountain Lion.
First of all, make a backup of your files using Time Machine and/or Carbon Copy Cloner. If you make both, good, but if you only make one, it's OK, too.
OS X Lion and OS X Mountain Lion aren't compatible with PowerPC applications, so you have to check if your applications are compatible > http://www.roaringapps.com If you have to update an application, do it before upgrading, because the Mountain Lion installer moves unsupported applications to a separate folder.
After doing that, open Disk Utility, select "Macintosh HD" in the sidebar and repair permissions. Then, verify the disk to check if it's OK. If everything is right, just open the App Store and purchase OS X Mountain Lion

IDM 6.0 - List users that have exclusions

For some individuals within a role, we are excluding the Active Directory resource. So what is the easiest way to generate a list of these users that have this exclusion?

Jim:
You are referring to creating forms, in IdM parlance. The specific form you are referring to is called a "User Form". When you create an administrator, you can associate a particular user form with that administrator.
The default user form is called "Tabbed User Form". The easiest way to customize a form is to copy the existing one and remove anything you do not need.
In the v6.0 manuals, there is a deployment example in "Deployment Overview" manual. Las step for the LDAP deployment is the cutomization of some of the admin forms. That should help.
It is pretty straightforward once you get the hang of it, but it takes some time to get there.
Cheers,
GB

Query: to view all users that have been created for access to a database

Hi,
Is there a command syntax that we could give to see all the users who have been created for access to a particular database. I want to view all the users that have been created using sql* plus.
can anyone help or is it impossible?
Thanks

This is for begging:
[email protected]> select grantee, privilege from dba_sys_privs where privilege like '%CREATE%SESSION%
2 /
GRANTEE PRIVILEGE
A CREATE SESSION
AA CREATE SESSION
U1 CREATE SESSION
U2 CREATE SESSION
BD1 CREATE SESSION
DBA CREATE SESSION
EMI CREATE SESSION
MOB CREATE SESSION
ODM CREATE SESSION
OHP CREATE SESSION
SEC CREATE SESSION
SYS CREATE SESSION
TU1 CREATE SESSION
TU2 CREATE SESSION
U01 CREATE SESSION
XDB CREATE SESSION
MOBI CREATE SESSION
OHP4 CREATE SESSION
PFAY CREATE SESSION
UD01 CREATE SESSION
UR01 CREATE SESSION
ADHOC CREATE SESSION
BATCH CREATE SESSION
DEBUG CREATE SESSION
DEV01 CREATE SESSION
HRAPP CREATE SESSION
MDSYS CREATE SESSION
MOBI2 CREATE SESSION
SKING CREATE SESSION
SPACE CREATE SESSION
UPASS CREATE SESSION
WKSYS CREATE SESSION
CTXSYS CREATE SESSION
ORDSYS CREATE SESSION
PRAC01 CREATE SESSION
RTABLE CREATE SESSION
CONNECT CREATE SESSION
Than you have to select also all the users that have granted roles with this privilege
this will give you the full set of users who can connect
Best Regards
Krystian Zieja / mob

Users that have hit their Throttling limit

Need to be able to get a list of users that have hit their RecipientRateLimit set in the default Throttling Policy.

Hi,
I have some tests in my environment. If the recipients are more than the number of recipients in a day you have set, then this message can't be sent actually, an error (such as "The message can't be sent right now" or "This message can't be
sent") will occur when you click Send. So the send action can't be finished. Based on my knowledge, Exchange has no built-in function to get the list of users who hit their RecipientRateLimit.
Here is a blog for your reference.
Some mysteries of Throttling Policy: Recipient Rate Limit
http://blogs.technet.com/b/fun_with_powershell/archive/2013/10/04/some-mysteries-of-throttling-policy-recipient-rate-limit.aspx
Hope my clarification can be helpful to you.
Best regards,
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

How to get calls placed that have expired on my motorala

i need to print my calls placed that have expired on my motorola

baxter1 I am here to help. In My Verizon the account owner can access and view up to 18 months of bills and call usage details. The account owner can sign in and click on either View Usage (for the most recent call information) or View Bill for the prior month's call usage information. You can even export this data to an Excel spreadsheet to save, sort and review later. In case you need it, this link can help you to find what you are looking for http://vz.to/17uKUdD .
BryanS_VZW
Follow us at Twitter @vzwsupport

WCS Lobby Ambassador and Monitor User

I'm running our WCS authentication through ACS with TACACS and it's working fine. However, I currently have my Help Desk setup with a monitor user so they can login and view WCS, but this does not give them the Lobby Ambassador of course. How can I get a user to have both WCS and Lobby access with having to login with seperate user identities?

It's either admin either lobby account, you can not have both, the http pages are completly different and dont intermix.
Your solution is to have 2 users on your TACACS where one is the admin and one the lobby.
Here are the step by step config lines:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/wcs/6.0/configuration/guide/6_0admin.html#wpmkr1064288

Delete a user that have versioned file

I have tryed to delete a user from iFS repository that have versioned a file. I have changed a owner to another user but still received an error on trying delete a user. Does exist any way to delete this user without deleting a versions of the files ?

moving to top again

Lobby Ambassador Managment of Users that have expired.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for