Local Integration Enginee

Hi All,
Can anybody tell me how to configure/Setup the Local Integration Engine in SRM5.0 system?
Thanking you
Regards
Pranav

Hi,
Pls see if the foll link helps:
http://www.ies.state.pa.us/srm/lib/srm/2006_05_26_srm_002.pdf
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

Similar Messages

Staff Integration Engineer

Integration/Software Engineer Position
We have an immediate need for innovative, results-oriented people that desire a challenging, fast-paced environment in which to apply their skills. The ideal candidate is highly motivated and possesses a professional attitude and an exceptional work ethic. He or she must also be able to perform with minimal supervision and deliver solutions to our customers on schedule and within budget.
Company: Mink Hollow Systems, Inc.
Location: Ashton, MD 20861
Experience: 2 Years
Status: Full Time, Exempt Employee
Salary Range: Commensurate with Experience
Start Date: Immediate
Relocation: Negotiable
Responsibilities
Develop software with National Instruments LabVIEW using industry best practices to reduce client risk
Work independently and on group projects in a professional office environment
Develop and implement requirements, designs, test plans, and end-user documentation
Proposal writing and cost estimation
Design and assemble test systems
Interface with clients to provide support
Requirements
Proficiency with LabVIEW Required (Developer Certification Preferred)
Experience with National Instruments hardware including FieldPoint, PXI, and PC-based devices
Ability to work independently in a fast paced environment and contribute to multiple projects
Effective interpersonal and problem-solving skills
Outstanding verbal and written communications/presentation skills
Ability to rapidly absorb new concepts and apply them effectively
Local and Short term travel required (Approximately 20% - 30% annually)
US Citizenship or Permanent US Residency authorized to work in this country for any employer (Because of the immediacy of this position, we are unable to sponsor people at this time.)
Preference is given to candidates with the following:
Certification: LabVIEW Certified Developer (or better)
Academic Qualifications
Minimum BS Engineering (BSChe, BSEE, BSME, etc.), Computer Science, or Applied Physics
Personal Qualifications
Interest in dynamic work environment with project variety
Ability to take on broad responsibilities and technical challenges
Goal-oriented, self-starting, and highly motivated
Proven ability to multi-task and follow-through on complex assignments
Able to meet objectives within budget and on schedule
Responses
Please forward resume and salary requirements to [email protected]
Principals only, no 3rd party resumes, agencies, or contractors accepted
Company Description
Mink Hollow Systems, Inc. is a small, dynamic engineering firm providing systems integration services to a diverse set of regional and national clients. Our broad range of government, military and industrial contracts allow us to provide our employees with challenging opportunities ranging from R&D applications, control systems, production test systems, Real-time and embedded systems, and more.
As a National Instruments Alliance Partner, we offer exciting professional challenges using LabVIEW and National Instruments products to provide solutions in a wide variety of application areas. We offer an excellent salary/benefit package including medical and dental coverage, pension and profit sharing plans, as well as generous leave policies.

resume is attached check it 1....................
Attachments:
venkatesh.doc ‏41 KB

Cisco ISE and SecurID Integration Questions

I'm looking for some clarity trying to understand something conceptually. I want to integrate Cisco ISE with RSA SecurID, the idea being that if the user authenticates with RSA SecurID they end up on one VLAN, however, if they don't authenticate with (or don't use, or don't have) SecurID they'll end up on another VLAN. Note that I'm not using SecurID for wireless access...all PCs are wired to Ethernet.
We have been using RSA SecurID for a while and are currently on version 8.0. Our users are authenticating via the RSA Agent typically on Windows 8.1. Instead of the usual Windows login prompt, the RSA Agent first prompts for the username and passcode (they use an app on their smartphones to get the passcode), then after a moment or two, it prompts for their Windows domain password.
We have recently installed Cisco ISE version 1.3. With the help of a local Cisco engineer and going through the "Cisco Identity Services Engine User Guide", I have it set up and running along with a few 'test' ports on our Cisco 6809 switch, it basically works...as a test it's simply set up that if they authenticate they're on one VLAN, if not, they end up on another (this is currently without using RSA...just out-of-the-box Windows authentication).
The Cisco engineer was unable to help me with RSA SecurID, so pressing on without him, out of the same user guide I have followed the directions for "RSA Identity Sources" under the "Managing Users and External Identity Sources", and that went well as far as ISE is concerned; I am now ready to get serious about getting ISE and SecurID working together.
My mistake in this design so far was assuming that the RSA agent on the Windows client PCs would communicate with Cisco ISE...there doesn't seem to be a way to have them point to a non-RSA SecurID server for authentication. The concept I'm missing is what, or how, the end-user machine is supposed to authenticate taking advantage of both ISE and SecurID.
I have dug deeper into the Cisco ISE documentation but it seems heavily biased towards Wi-Fi and BYOD implementations and it's not clear to me what applies to wired vs wireless. Perhaps it's a case that I'm not seeing the forest for the trees, but I'm not understanding what the end-user authentication looks like. It apears that as I learn more about ISE, it should become the primary SSO source, that SecurID becomes just an identity source and the PC clients would no-longer directly communicate with the SecurID servers. That being the case, do I need to replace the SecurID client on the PCs and something else Cisco-ish fills this role? An agent for ISE? How do they continue to use their passcode without the RSA agent?
Thanks!

The external db not operation indicates that there is no communication between ACS and RSA. Did you fetch the package.cab file to analyse the auth.log file?
Have you already gone through the below listed link?
http://www.security-solutions.co.za/cisco-CSACS-1113-SE-4.2-RSA-Authentication-Manager-Integration-Configuration-Example.html
Regards,
Jatin Katyal
- Do rate helpful posts -

How to find out the HTTP destination of the Integration Server

Hi,
during the technical configuration of the exchange infrastructure the HTTP destination of the integration server was specified. Unfortunately I don't know this destination and need it now to configure the Business Systems as the Local Integration Engine. I read in the SAP library that the destination consists of the following:
Target Host,
Service No. (HTTP or HTTPS port) and
Path Prefix (path in the HTTP service tree of the SAP NetWeaver AS) which is /sap/xi/engine?type=entry
But when I type in the corresponding address (e.g. http://ccc60:4444/sap/xi/engine?type=entry) I got a message that the requested resource does not exist.
How can I find out this destination?

Hi Marc,
Is your server name the complete qualified name?.
You can get this from SMICM>Goto>parameters-->Dispay
Parameter: icm/host_name_full
HTTP port name: SMICM>Goto>service.
Regards
Vijaya

Ask the Expert: Integrating Cisco Identity Service Engine (ISE) 1.2 for BYOD

With Eric Yu and Todd Pula
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about integrating Cisco ISE 1.2 for BYOD with experts Eric Yu and Todd Pula.
Cisco Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) is an end-to-end architecture that orchestrates the integration of Cisco's mobile and security architectures to various third-party components. The session takes a deep dive into the available tools and methodologies for troubleshooting the Cisco BYOD solution to identify root causes for problems that stem from mobile device manager integration, Microsoft Active Directory and certificate authority services, and Cisco Enterprise Mobility integration to the Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE).
Todd and Eric recently delivered a technical workshop that helps network designers and network engineers understand integration of the various Cisco BYOD components by taking a deep dive to analyze best practice configurations and time-saving troubleshooting methodologies. The content consisted of common troubleshooting scenarios in which TAC engineers help customers address operational challenges as seen in real Cisco BYOD deployments.
Eric Yu is a technical leader at Cisco responsible for supporting our leading-edge borderless network solutions. He has 10 years of experience in the telecommunications industry designing data and voice networks. Previous to his current role, he worked as a network consulting engineer for Cisco Advance Services, responsible for designing and implementing Cisco Unified Communications for Fortune 500 enterprises. Before joining Cisco, he worked at Verizon Business as an integration engineer responsible for developing a managed services solution for Cisco Unified Communications. Eric holds CCIE certification in routing and switching no. 14590 and has two patents pending related to Cisco's medianet.
Todd Pula is a member of the TAC Security and NMS Technical Leadership team supporting the ISE and intrusion prevention system (IPS) product lines. Todd has 15 years of experience in the networking and information security industries, with 6 years of experience working in Cisco's TAC organization. Previous to his current role, Todd was a TAC team lead providing focused technical support on Cisco's wide array of VPN products. Before joining Cisco, he worked at Stanley Black & Decker as a network engineer responsible for the design, configuration, and support of an expansive global network infrastructure. Todd holds his CCIE in routing and switching no. 19383 and an MS degree in IT from Capella University.
Remember to use the rating system to let Eric and Todd know if you have received an adequate response.
Because of the volume expected during this event, Eric and Todd might not be able to answer every question. Remember that you can continue the conversation in the Security community, subcommunity AAA, Identity and NAC, shortly after the event. This event lasts through November 15, 2013. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other Cisco Support Community members.

Hi Antonio,
Many great questions to start this series. For the situation that you are observing with your FlexConnect configuration, is the problem 100% reproducible or is it intermittent? Does the problem happen for one WLAN but not another? As it stands today, the CoA-Ack needs to be initiated by the management interface. This limitation is documented in bug CSCuj42870. I have provided a link for your reference below. If the problem happens 100% of the time, the two configuration areas that I would check first include:
On the WLC, navigate to Security > RADIUS > Authentication. Click on the server index number for the associated ISE node. On the edit screen, verify that the Support for RFC 3576 option is enabled.
On the WLC, navigate to the WLANs tab and click on the WLAN ID for the WLAN in question. On the edit screen, navigate to Security > AAA and make sure the Radius Server Overwrite interface is unchecked. When this option is checked, the WLC will attemp to send client authentication requests and the CoA-Ack/Nak via the dynamic interface assigned to the WLAN vs. the management interface. Because of the below referenced bug, all RADIUS packets except the CoA-Ack/Nak will actually be transmitted via the dynamic interface. As a general rule of thumb, if using the Radius NAC option on a WLAN, you should not configure the Radius Server Overwrite interface feature.
Bug Info: https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuj42870
For your second question, you raise a very valid point which I am going to turn into a documentation enhancement request. We don't currently have a document that lists the possible supplicant provisioning wizard errors that may be encountered. Please feel free to post specific errors that you have questions about in this chat and we will try to get you answers. For most Android devices, the wizard log file can be found at /sdcards/downloads/spw.log.
As for product roadmap questions, we won't be able to discuss this here due to NDA. Both are popular asks from the field so it will be interesting to see what the product marketing team comes up with for the next iterration of ISE.
Related Info:
Wireless BYOD for FlexConnect Deployment Guide

Logical System for Role Integration Server

Dear all,
I need your help to clear my confuse.From ID I had assign business system as defined by Role Integration Server but when I check Adapter-Specific Identifiers, nothing show in Logical System. I already define Logical system in SLD. but I'm not sure incase of Role Integration Server will show logical system same with role Application System or not. becasue the other one as role Application System it's fine.
Thanks and Regards
Park

Hi Park,
I could not clearly understand your question .But i think you want to know the roles of the Integration server and Application system.I would like to share some thing on their difference .Hope this will clearify you.
A business system can be configured as an Integration server or Application system:
Integration Server
The Integration server executes only integration logic available Integration Builder. They can also be identified as Pipe Line Steps. It receives XML message, determines the receiver, executes the mappings, and routes the XML message to the corresponding receiver systems. Thus configured Integration Engine is identified to be Central Configured Integration engine.
Note: Only one client of SAP system can be configured as Integration Server.
Application system
The Application system will not execute the integration logic. It in turn calls the integration server to execute the integration logic if required. It acts as sender or receiver of XML messages. So, the Application system with a local Integration Engine requires the Integration server to execute the integration logic
Thanks,
Ram.

Proxy messages not processed in PI 7.1 pipeline coming from local client

Dear experts,
We have recently installed a PI7.1 system with two clients:
200 - Integration Server
250 - Local Integration Engine
Now, when we send proxy messages from the 250 client to the 200 client,
the messages are not processed in the integration server. The message
does arrive as we can see in SXMB_MONI, but there is no receiver determination
or what-so-ever executed. In SXMB_MONI we can see that only the SENDER
pipeline is executed.
Proxy messages from 6.20 and 7.0 systems to IS are properly processed.
Ofcourse the 250 client is defined as an application system in the integation engine
configuration (SXMB_ADM).
regards,
Jeroen

In SXMB_MONI we can see that only the SENDER pipeline is executed.
Yes. Even if no receivers are configured the data from sender to XI should be visible in sxmb_moni.
Check smq1 at XI. There could be some problem with the technical system for client 250.
Regards,
Prateek

Integration Engine Message Id in ABAP Proxy

Hi,
I have a scenario sending to XI from CRM using an ABAP Proxy.
I need to get the message id generated in the local Integration Engine when a message is sent via the ABAP Proxy or received into the ABAP Proxy.
I see there is a way of doing this in XI and also thought I had found a way of getting it in the proxy in CRM but this does not seem to work correctly even though i can see the message ID being created in the proxy call to XI.
I am trying to get the message id immediately after the proxy call to XI.
Kind regards
Colin.

Hi Colin,
as far as I know, it is possible. Have a look at the online help on abap proxies and check out the determination of message id:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a1/082589fc4246f09793039d5fb01a17/content.htm
Hope that helps,
regards, jaime

Transferring message between two Integration servers using th XI adapter

Hello all,
I have the following scenario:
1) Local SAP R3 sends an iDoc to a local Integration server (XI3.0)
2) The local IS transfers the iDoc to a remote IS (XI3.0) through HTTP.
3) The remote IS is supposed to send the iDoc to it's own SAP R3 system.
Here is what I tried:
On my local Integration Server:
   - I have defined the remote IS as a "normal" business system.
   - I have created an XI adapter as a receiver communication channel with HTTP 1.0 protocol.
   - I set the URL option and set the correct host name and port.
   - I have entered the pipeline url: /sap/xi/engine?type=entry
It seems that all the parameters are correct but the HTTP response contains error 404.
Any ideas ?
Thank you,
Elad Saar.

Hi Elad,
We did XI-XI communictions a bit different, we approached it as a B2B scenario. We defined a Party for the sending XI system and we created an abstract interface with the Idoc messagetype (because you need on both sides the same interface name/namespace and we use naming conventions).
In the receiver agreement of the sending XI system you have to replace the party and service name with the ones you have did setup on the receiving XI.
I hope this helps you in the right directions
Cheers,
Frank

SXMB_ADM settings in Integration engine Configuration

Hi , with reference to the blog
How do you activate ABAP Proxies?
--- refer to the step ---2 Configuration Business system as local Integration Engine.
1. Goto Transaction SXMB_ADM
2. Choose Edit --> Change Global Configuration Data.
3. Select Role of Business System: Application system
4. Corresponding Integration server: dest://<HTTPDESTINATION>. Here <HTTPDESTINATION> SAPISU_XID created in step 1. Dest://SAPISU_XID.
Now if I do this step., then IDX5 will no more work,, rather weo2/o5 will start working.....is this ok,, i mean changing the Role of Business System = Integration server to Application system??, the usage of IDx5 will cease to exist,
Arnab

Hi,
oh i am sorry, you mean to say, as per blog,
How do you activate ABAP Proxies?
am I was supposed to do this setting for SXMB_ADM in r3 , not in XI.....is this what you meant??
Also , with reference to the above link, while creating the HTTP connection, it is giving a popup messehe, HTTP connection may not be secure.....what can be the problem due to this due to insecurity!!
Thanks in advancee!!
Edited by: Arnab Mondal on Sep 25, 2008 1:32 PM

Undesrtanding Proxy communication with the Integration Engine

I want to understand all the process in a client proxy communication. I know that the Local integration engine sends a PI-SOAP to the Central Integration Engine, and the local integration engine makes the communication with the ICM in the SAP PI side. My question are the next:
1. SAP documentation mentions that the XI Adapter is necessary. Where is it located?, after or before of the ICM in the SAP PI side. What is it function?, because the message is already in PI-SOAP format.
2. How does the local integration engine send the PI-SOAP message? Does it need an XI-Adapter ?.
Thanks in advance.

HI,
1. SAP documentation mentions that the XI Adapter is necessary. Where is it located?, after or before of the ICM in the SAP PI side. What is it function?, because the message is already in PI-SOAP format.
2. How does the local integration engine send the PI-SOAP message? Does it need an XI-Adapter ?.
-->XI Adapter is necessary only at the receiver side not at the sender side, by using proxy pre-configuration steps and proxy framework message from the sender system(Client proxy) will reach PI system. So, in this case XI adapter is not necessary(adapterless communication).
Proxy Framework which consists of Proxy Generator and Proxy Runtime:
Proxy Generator- Converts ABAP corresponding elements to WSDL corresponding elements and viceversa and by using Proxy Runtime, local Integration will be connected to Central Integration.
When a request is sent form client proxy-->ABAP corresponding elements will be converted to WSDL elements and local integration engine will be connected to central integration engine and whole process will be done.
If the receiver system is SAP, and since there can be many SAP systems connected to PI, to send data from PI to that particular receiver SAP system, PI needs the receiver system details like business system name etc. So, XI adapter is manadatory only at the receiver side.
check out this blog for more info:
[http://www.****************/Tutorials/XI/ABAPProxy/page1.htm]
Regards,
Sunitha

Difference between integration architect and integration technologist

Hello,
I am in reference to p�7 of the specification. Can anyone give me practical examples of tasks performed by an integration architect and an integration technologist please?
Thanks in advance,
Julien Martin.

An integration architect plays a role much like other types of software architects: specifying the overall structure of the system, and how the parts inter-relate. He has knowledge of both the enterprise's needs (from a business perspective), and a strong technical background in integration technologies.
The integration technologist implements the architect's plan. He has in-depth knowledge of particular integration technologies.
These roles are logically separate, and in large organisations they are indeed performed by different individuals. In smaller organisations these roles are simply one of many "hats" worn by the local integration guru.

AAA Local with Privilege Levels

The goal....
1. local usernames on a router to control access
2. Use privilege levels in the username command to reflect what a user is allowed to do
3. Define a set of commands available to users with privilege level 1
My trouble here is that I cannot seem to find this exact combination of commands for what I want to do on CCO or Google. I have tried several combinations and here is what I have so far, but its not working.
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default local
aaa authorization commands 1 default local
username engineer priv 15 pass XXXX
username tech priv 1 pass XXXX
privilege exec level 1 traceroute
â¨privilege exec level 1 ping

Hi,
This link answers your question.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk59/technologies_tech_note09186a00800949d5.shtml
aaa authori command is not reqd.
Regards,
~JG
Do rate helpful posts

Diffrence Between Local IE And Central IE

Hi All,
What is the difference between the local Integration Engine And the Central Integration Engine ???
Please Explain me
Regards
Vamsi

The systems on which SAP WAS is installed has Integration Engine as one of its components. Now for PI/XI also WAS is a must. Therefore PI/XI also has an Integration Engine called as Integration Server.
Now talking in terms of PI/XI, Integration Server has Adapter Engine, Integration engine (for pipeline steps) and Business Process Engine. This Integration Server is the central Integration Engine.
The Integration Engine of other systems is termed as local Integration Engine
Regards,
Prateek

Archive / Delete in AE and Application System with Local IE

Hi:
When come to archive and deleting strategies, except the messages persisted in central Integation Engine, should we include messages in Adatper Engine and Local Integration Engine ?
Thanks
Liang

if you are busing windows server backup they should self manage the space, the exception would be if you are using the external drive for something else besides the backups and that is causing it to run out of space.
Your external device should have a "windowsimagebackup" folder that contains the backup since you have not been getting a backup in the past 3-4 night you may want to just wipe that folder and start fresh with a full backup. the drive space may be misleading
too, if the drives you are backing up don't have enough space to create a snapshot you will get space errors so you may want to make sure you have space available on the backup drives too.
If your exchange component on SBS has not backed up you may have accumulated transaction log files causing disk space to be too low. you can clear the log files but turning on circular logging cycle the unmounts exchange database and remount, then turn off
circular logging and cycle the database again. Circular logging can be found under the database setting in the exchange console.

Local Integration Enginee

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for