Local PO not replicated to Backend.

Hi SRM Gurus,
We are in SRM 7 ECC 6 Ehp 4 PPS. Ext Classic.
Create PO from the RFx Response.  Local PO is created in held status. 
BBP_PD shows bunch of errors/ warnings:
Term of payment does not exist in target system
Incoterm in document is not the incoterm in supplier/bidder master
You are not allowed to enter a tax jurisdiction code for country US.
SLG1 errors:
No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External reference:
Back-End Message:E002(MEPO) : "PO header data still faulty"
Back-End Message:E049(06) : "Enter a vendor"
Back-End Message:W005(W5) : "Please enter items first"
Now the questions:
1.   SRM 7.0 ECC 6 Ehp 4 PPS activated Ext. Classic -  Local PO created from RFx response goes to held status.
      Does the backend replication happen through eSOA.  If yes?  What service i have to configure in SOAManager both ends.
2.   Is it possible to by-pass ECS scenario using ZBBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI for PO creation alone in the Backend system?
3.   When you create PO from RFx response, how will the ACC Assignment handled  if i use By-Pass Badi.
       Will the PO if at all created in the ECC will it be in held status.
Why we want to by-pass ECS for PO alone is we have a Release Order to be done in Backend from this PO.
Number Ranges, Document Types are configured correctly.
In PPOMA, i have configured DP_PROC_TY as ECPO and PO (SRM) do i need to give Trans Type of ECC too.
I also have configured BSA referring ECC ECPO and PO defined.
Kindly go thro all these information and kindly share your thoughts.
Highly appreciated.
With warm regards,
Freemind.

Hello,
this is strange, because in ECS the local PO gets an ID, and this ID is used during the transfer to R/3.
Debug BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC once again to see where this ID is cleared.
To you have activated the BADI BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI to transfer data to R/3 ?
Be carefull, some BADI need to populate all export parameters/tables (E_*) otherwise the inbound data is considered as erased.
Where is the ID disappearing ? in SRM just before calling R/3, or in R/3 ? In that case look at user-exit or BADI is R/3.
Rgds
Christophe

Similar Messages

  • SRM 7.0 PO not replicated to Backend ECC 6.0 Ehp 4

    Hi SRM Gurus,
    SRM 7.0  SP 8 - ECC 6.04 SAPKH60406 ECS
    RFx Response to PO -
    SRM Local PO is created and is in held status.  Purchaser gives the source of supply and Acc Assignment and order it.
    PO now is in Ordered status.
    Issue: this PO is not replicated to Backend ECC 6.04.
    Did the Debugging as follows:
    1.  BP at B46B_DPO_TRANSFER.
    2.  Got the PO GUID from the BBP_PD transaction.
    3.  FM BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC, execute it and it  stopped in the breakpoint.
    4.  On 'FUNCTION 'BBP_PO_INBOUND' DESTINATION lv_destination',  hit F6.
    5. Checked  lt_bapi_return details.
    Here there should be information regarding some error during the PO copy to backend.
    With this error message you can check why the PO was not created in backend.
    ERRORS from Backend are as follows:
    1.   No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External reference:   E  BAPI 001
    2.   Document contains no items       E    ID 06   Number 010
    3.   Please enter items first.              W   ID 05                 005
    No XML messages in SXMB_moni both in SRM side and ECC side.
    What am i doing wrong here?  Any help is highly appreciated.
    with regards,
    Freemind

    RZ20 errors:
    Local Errors:   Business to Business Procurement(600)
    Error reading export data for EXEC transfer of purchase order
    Error in local purchase order; no update of references in EXEC system
    Backend Errors:
    PO 3000000051: No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External reference:
    Purchase order 3000000051: Document contains no items
    Purchase order 3000000051: Transfer Failed; Resubmit
    Since we are in SRM 7.0 ECC 6.04 Ehp 4,  with PI 7.11 + ROS and no SUS.
    doent the system uses ESOA Service for PO replication.
    We did CCTR / CPPR scenarios too. Both are sucessful.
    Do we need to impl BADI PUR_SE_PO_INTERFACE_OUT_SELECT
    But thats for Service hierarchy and Service POs -  We dont have Service hierarchy or SUS in our SLD.
    IF PO replication also uses PI, what configuration do i need to do?

  • SRM 7.0 Contract not replicating to backend system

    Hi,
    We have created CCTR global outline agreement in SRM 7.0 extended classic scenario. the contract is not replicating into backend. we have maintained necessary message types BLAORD, COND_A in ECC system as inbound parameters for partner type as SRM system.
    when i looked rz20, i am seeing the message as "back end data could not be read"
    When I executed function module B46B_CTR_TRANSFER I am getting an error, RFC destination could not be found.
    please let me know what we are missing.
    thanks
    vem

    "Hi,
    I guess your SRM70 connected to backend ECC with EHP4 pack applied. If so, Central contract will not use IDocs instead it works on new eSOA technology where Xi/PI need to be set up to process service calls.
    If you are not using EHp 4 pack on your ECC, then SRM70 use IDocs to distribute contracts to backend.
    Thanks,
    Jagadish
    Hi jagdish,
    we are on SRM 7.0 and ENHPack 4.0 and as you said its picking up the eSOA route to distribute contracts in backend ECC system.
    I would like to know how can we  this programmatically ( BADI / Enhancement points)  and force system to pick the ALE/IDOC route ???
    Do you know any BADI / Enhancement points where we can implement this ???

  • PO not replicated in Backend

    Hi,
    I have created a SC and that SC got approved by all the approvers. PO also generated in SRM. But that PO is not replicated in backend. I have checked that PO in SRM through Process purchase order. The status in "Error in process" and even I have make changes in the PO through Process PO and order it. But then also it has not replicated in backend and the Status is also same as earlier.
    Could any one can tell me what should be the right way to replicate this to backend?
    I am using Extended classic and self service procurement.

    Hello,
    You can check if the PO in question can be transferred manually to ECC system, in order to check if there is an error with this action:
    - Breakpoint at FM B46B_DPO_TRANSFER;
    - SE37 BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC, enter PO header GUID and execute;
    - Program will stop at FM where the BP was set;
    - Look for statement CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PO_INBOUND' DESTINATION lv_destination;
    - F6 or F5 to debug into ERP (2nd session will start). Here you can check the table lt_bapi_return in order to check if the PO has been created or not in backend.
    Kind regards,
    Ricardo

  • Plan driven procurement: PO not replicated at backend

    Hi Experts,
    I am working with extended classic scenario (SRM 7.0 and ECC 6.0).  
    If I create a shopping cart and then PO at SRM, this PO is transfer to ECC sucessfully.
    But for external requirements, purchase order is not replicated into ECC.  So, if purchase requisitions is created at backend, transfer to SRM,  PO created at SRM without errors, then PO is not replicated at backend. 
    No errors appear at SLG1 nor RZ20 nor SMQ1/2.
    After debugging I found out that SUBTYPE field from BBP_PDIGP table is empty.   
    Any idea how can this issue could be solved?  How can be PO replicated at ECC?
    Thanks in advance!
    Best Regards,
    Martín Amat

    Hello,
    You can check if there is an error returning from backend.
    Follow the steps below:
    - Breakpoint at FM B46B_DPO_TRANSFER;
    - SE37 BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC, enter PO header GUID and execute;
    - Program will stop at FM where the BP was set.
    - Look for statement CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PO_INBOUND' DESTINATION lv_destination;
    - F6 or F5 to debug into ERP (2nd session will start). Here you can check the table lt_bapi_return in order to check the result.
    If you have a RFC with dialog user, you can debug through the ECC system and check why and when the error message is generated.
    Regards,
    Ricardo

  • Change in account assignment for Limit Order SRM not replicated to backend

    User has made in SRM (5.0 Ext Classic scenario) a limit shopping cart with Invoice and Confirmation and Acc. assigment 'Known' . This resulted in a PO with has been replicated to backend . In MM PO with Imtem category 'D' has been created.
    The user know reports that he has made wrong account assignment and asks for change so that the new cost assigment appears in his Confirmations as proposal.
    Normally I am able to do this through Tx 'process purchase order' (BBP_POC) in SRM and it is properly replicated to backend - meaning PO in MM is updated with new cost assigment
    However for this limit order the changes I have made in BBP_POC seems not to be replicated into backend and hence on goods receipt it still shows the old assigment.
    Anyone an idea of cause for this?
    Thanks in advance for any reply or help

    Hello,
    1) Are you seeing any errors in rz20.
    2) You may consider transferring the PO again to the backed using the function module BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC.
    3) If you see any account assignment errors , check the account assignment in SRM and ERP PO are the same or as mapped in the table BBP_C_ACC
    Regards,
    Pavan

  • Service Cofirmation not replicated in Backend system

    Hi All,
      When we are confirming service good in the SRM browser it is not being replicated in R/3, WS10400010 is being triggered and completed successfully but the data is not replicated in R/3.
    I have checked the successful one and it has system status I1017,I1018 but the one which failed to replicate in R/3 has no statuses I1017 and I1018.
    Can any one let me know what is the actual problem and what needs to be checked in R/3 whether the data is flowing or not.
    Its urgent and every reply is hoghly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Ravi G

    Hi Ravi,
    Check in SLG1 & RZ20 (Application Monitors) for any error logs and detailed error description.
    Check whether the programme BBP_GET_STATUS_2 is running properly in the back groung or not in the back ground.
    In case the IDOC is getting failed check for the reason for failure of the IDOC in back end R/3 using WE05 / WE02 txn.
    Please make  the desired changes as per the IDOC failure message and reprocess the IDOC.
    Hope this will make you clear about the issue. Clarifications are welcome.
    Do update us for further help.
    Award points for helpful answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • Limit PO price changes are not replicated to ECC backend

    Hi all,
    SRM 5.0 ECS SP13.
    When I change the value(increase/decrease) in limt PO which is already created(PO is changed for first time) and order the PO,under Overview screen.,the PO total value(at header level) shows the correct changed /new value while at the Item level,the Net price is shown as the old value!However when I go and check the item details,the  field "VALUE" and "EXPECTED VALUE" have the changed/new value.
    Because of the above issue,the PO changes are not replicated to ECC backend system.When I tested the BAPI BAPI_PO_CHANGE1 with the test data,there is no error mesasge in ECC backend system.
    After this,when I change the PO for second time(again value increase/descrease),the total value and net price is shown correctly in SRM and changes are also replicated to ECC backend system!
    I have also checked the cong for SPOOLPARAMETERS under Set Control Parameters and eveything is set correctly as shown below
    SPOOL_JOB_USER     User that execueds spool job.     CUA_ADMIN
    SPOOL_LEAD_INTERVAL     intervall by which the retrytime incr.     60
    SPOOL_MAX_RETRY     Max. number of retrys for writing BAPIS     10
    Can someone throw some pointers how to resolve the above issue.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi
    can you recreate the same issue
    are you saying that
    1. create a limit po for 100 USD and replicated to ECC AS 100 USD total value.
    2 . now update the PO in SRM 150 USD and it was not replicated to ECC ?
    or
    1. limit sc
    2. Limit PO
    3. update not reached ECC.
    Note 1284361 - Limits not transferred to backend purchase order
    Symptom
    Extended classic scenario.
    You have ordered a purchase order with more than one hierarchy item containing a limit.The purchase order is created or updated in the backend system without errors but the limits are missing in the backend purchase order.

  • PO not created in Backend

    HI,
    My SRM Quality gets re-freshed and i am on ECS scenario, i change all the ALE settings and now i am able to create a Shopping cart but when PO is created in my SRM system it is not replicated in ECC quality and i can see my status of the Purchase order when created with ref to SC is Ordered.
    PLease let me know what all are the settings i need to check so that when my PO is created it will get replicated in ECC system.
    Smriti

    Hi Smriti,
    This is a general error message which is returned by the function META_ACCSERV_CHECKACCASSIGNMT for any exception returned by the backend while checking for account assignment.
    Problem is more than likely to do with your table BBP_BACKEND_DEST, here is a snapshot of ours.
    Ensure your SRM system is the only one of type LOCAL, and with X under LOC_SYS.
    Also ensure your SYS_TYPE for the connected backend is correct.
    LOG_SYS     DEST                   SYS_TYPE    RFC_POSS LOC_SYS FI_VALIDATION
                                                                                    PMECLNT300  PMECLNT300       LOCAL           X                     X        0          
    QPTCLNT100  QPTCLNT100       ERP_2.0         X                                0          
    QZ4CLNT100  QZ4CLNT100      R/3_4.0B        X                                0          
    QZ8CLNT100  QZ8CLNT100      R/3_4.6C        X                                0
    You should also check the IMG setting Define Backend System and the the RFC checkbox has been flagged for the backend.
    Also very importantly see that in PPOMA the attribute ACS and SYS is correct.
    These suggestions should work, if they don't, as at beginning of my reply, the error you are getting is a generic error.
    If you set a breakpoint at META_ACCSERV_CHECKACCASSIGNMT you should be able to see the actual errors that are returning from the backend before they are filtered down to that error.
    Also if you RFC into backend through this FM and set BP at statement message you will stop at exact error, then can note search or look for more information in SDN.
    Hope this helps.
    Kind Regards,
    Matthew

  • "error: thread-local storage not supported for this target"

    I have a program that uses the __thread specifier, to be run on a Solaris 9/UltraSprac.
    I am not able to compile it using gcc 3.4.4 or 4.0.4, it emits the msg "error: thread-local storage not supported for this target".
    xz@gamera% gcc -v -Wall -D_REENTRANT -c -o func_stack.o func_stack.c
    Reading specs from /opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/specs
    Configured with: ../srcdir/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/3.4.4 --disable-nls
    Thread model: posix
    gcc version 3.4.4
    /opt/gcc/3.4.4/libexec/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/cc1 -quiet -v -D_REENTRANT -DMESS func_stack.c -quiet -dumpbase func_stack.c -mcpu=v7 -auxbase-strip func_stack.o -Wall -version -o /var/tmp//cc0poHSN.s
    ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
    ignoring nonexistent directory "/opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/../../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.8/include"
    #include "..." search starts here:
    #include <...> search starts here:
    /opt/gcc/3.4.4/include
    /opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/include
    /usr/include
    End of search list.
    GNU C version 3.4.4 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8)
            compiled by GNU C version 3.4.4.
    GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
    func_stack.c:16: error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
    func_stack.c:17: error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
    func_stack.c:19: error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
    xs@gamera% gcc -v -D_REENTRANT  -c -o func_stack.o func_stack.c
    Using built-in specs.
    Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.9
    Configured with: /net/clpt-v490-0/export/data/bldmstr/20070711_mars_gcc/src/configure --prefix=/usr/sfw --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-checking=release --disable-libmudflap --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --with-cpu=v9 --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --without-gnu-ld
    Thread model: posix
    gcc version 4.0.4 (gccfss)
    /pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../libexec/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/cc1 -quiet -v -I. -iprefix /pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/ -D__sparcv8 -D_REENTRANT -DMESS func_stack.c -quiet -dumpbase func_stack.c -mcpu=v9 -auxbase-strip func_stack.o -version -m32 -o /tmp/ccjsdswh.s -r /tmp/cc2w4ZRo.ir
    ignoring nonexistent directory "/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/../../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.9/include"
    ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
    ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/sfw/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/include"
    ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/sfw/lib/../sparc-sun-solaris2.9/include"
    #include "..." search starts here:
    #include <...> search starts here:
    /pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/include
    /usr/sfw/include
    /usr/include
    End of search list.
    GNU C version 4.0.4 (gccfss) (sparc-sun-solaris2.9)
            compiled by GNU C version 4.0.4 (gccfss).
    GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
    func_stack.c:16: error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
    func_stack.c:17: error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
    func_stack.c:19: error: thread-local storage not supported for this targetJust as comparison, the corresponding output of compiling another file which does not have __thread declaration is as follows:
    xz@gamera% gcc -v -Wall -D_REENTRANT -c -o common.o common.c
    Reading specs from /opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/specs
    Configured with: ../srcdir/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/3.4.4 --disable-nls
    Thread model: posix
    gcc version 3.4.4
    /opt/gcc/3.4.4/libexec/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/cc1 -quiet -v -D_REENTRANT -DMESS common.c -quiet -dumpbase common.c -mcpu=v7 -auxbase-strip common.o -Wall -version -o /var/tmp//cc4VxrLz.s
    ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
    ignoring nonexistent directory "/opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/../../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.8/include"
    #include "..." search starts here:
    #include <...> search starts here:
    /opt/gcc/3.4.4/include
    /opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/include
    /usr/include
    End of search list.
    GNU C version 3.4.4 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8)
            compiled by GNU C version 3.4.4.
    GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
    /usr/ccs/bin/as -V -Qy -s -xarch=v8 -o common.o /var/tmp//cc4VxrLz.s
    /usr/ccs/bin/as: Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 Compiler Common 6.2 Solaris_9_CBE 2001/04/02Note that the last 2 lines seem to suggest that a Sun assembler is used as the back-end of gcc. I am not sure whether the failure to compile the first file (with __thread) was due to the incompatibility of this Sun assembler. In the first case, the error msg was emitted before these 2 lines are printed.
    I further read a post about gcc 3.3.3's inability to compile code that has __thread in it, on a HP-UX 11.11: http://forums12.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447627+1216595175060+28353475&threadId=1148976 The conclusion seems to suggest that "the 2.17 GNU assembler did not support thread local storage" and gcc sees that and thus disallows TLS.
    If the assembler is the culprit, then does anyone know whether this "Sun WorkShop 6 update 2" assembler in my installation can work with TLS? And how come a Sun assembler becomes the back-end of gcc? I read that gas (the GNU assembler) is the default backend of gcc. (How) can one specify the assembler to be used for gcc?
    As an aside, I am able to compile my file on this same Solaris 9/UltraSparc platform using the Sun Studio 12 C Compiler:
    xz@gamera% cc -V -# -D_REENTRANT  -c -o func_stack.o func_stack.c
    cc: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_sparc Patch 124867-01 2007/07/12
    ### Note: NLSPATH = /pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/bin/../lib/locale/%L/LC_MESSAGES/%N.cat:/pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/bin/../../lib/locale/%L/LC_MESSAGES/%N.cat
    ###     command line files and options (expanded):
    ### -c -D_REENTRANT  -V func_stack.c -o func_stack.o
    /pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/bin/acomp -xldscope=global -i func_stack.c -y-fbe -y/pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/bin/fbe -y-xarch=generic -y-xmemalign=8i -y-o -yfunc_stack.o -y-verbose -y-xthreadvar=no%dynamic -y-comdat -xdbggen=no%stabs+dwarf2+usedonly -V -D_REENTRANT  -m32 -fparam_ir -Qy -D__SunOS_5_9 -D__SUNPRO_C=0x590 -D__SVR4 -D__sun -D__SunOS -D__unix -D__sparc -D__BUILTIN_VA_ARG_INCR -D__C99FEATURES__ -Xa -D__PRAGMA_REDEFINE_EXTNAME -Dunix -Dsun -Dsparc -D__RESTRICT -xc99=%all,no%lib -D__FLT_EVAL_METHOD__=0 -I/pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/include/cc "-g/pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/bin/cc -V -D_REENTRANT  -c -o func_stack.o " -fsimple=0 -D__SUN_PREFETCH -destination_ir=yabe
    acomp: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_sparc Patch 124867-01 2007/07/12Interestingly, the output no longer mentions the "/usr/ccs/bin/as: Sun WorkShop 6 update 2" assembler.

    Just as another comparison, I compiled a file without __thread on the Solaris 9/UltraSparc platform using gcc 4.0.4. Not surprisingly it worked. But I no longer see the mention of the Sun assembler as in the case of gcc 3.4.4. Nor did I see the mention of "GNU assembler" as in the case of gcc 4.0.4/Solaris 10/x86. Instead, I saw something called "iropt" and "cg". Does anyone know what they are?
    xz@gamera% gcc -v -Wall -D_REENTRANT -c -o common.o common.c
    Using built-in specs.
    Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.9
    Configured with: /net/clpt-v490-0/export/data/bldmstr/20070711_mars_gcc/src/configure --prefix=/usr/sfw --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-checking=release --disable-libmudflap --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --with-cpu=v9 --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --without-gnu-ld
    Thread model: posix
    gcc version 4.0.4 (gccfss)
    /pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../libexec/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/cc1 -quiet -v -iprefix /pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/ -D__sparcv8 -D_REENTRANT -DMESS common.c -quiet -dumpbase common.c -mcpu=v9 -auxbase-strip common.o -Wall -version -m32 -o /tmp/ccSGJIDD.s -r /tmp/ccKuJz76.ir
    ignoring nonexistent directory "/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/../../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.9/include"
    ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
    ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/sfw/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/include"
    ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/sfw/lib/../sparc-sun-solaris2.9/include"
    #include "..." search starts here:
    #include <...> search starts here:
    /pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/include
    /usr/sfw/include
    /usr/include
    End of search list.
    GNU C version 4.0.4 (gccfss) (sparc-sun-solaris2.9)
            compiled by GNU C version 4.0.4 (gccfss).
    GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
    /pkg/gcc/4.0.4/SUNW0scgfss/4.0.4/prod/bin/iropt -F -xarch=v8plus -xchip=generic -O1 -xvector=no -xbuiltin=%none -xcache=generic -Qy -h_gcc -o /tmp/ccUl4mVM.ircg /tmp/ccKuJz76.ir -N/dev/null -is /tmp/ccSGJIDD.s
    /pkg/gcc/4.0.4/SUNW0scgfss/4.0.4/prod/bin/cg -Qy -xarch=v8plus -xchip=generic -OO0 -T3 -Qiselect-C0 -Qrm:newregman:coalescing=0 -xcode=abs32 -xcache=generic -xmemalign=8i -il /pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4//gccbuiltins.il -xvector=no -xthreadvar=no%dynamic -xbuiltin=%none -Qassembler-ounrefsym=0 -Qiselect-T0 -Qassembler-I -Qassembler-U -comdat -h_gcc -is /tmp/ccSGJIDD.s -ir /tmp/ccUl4mVM.ircg -oo common.o

  • Vendor not known in backend

    Hi All,
    i am using ECS (Server 5.5).
    Employee created SC, it went PO held status, i login as a purchaser and when purchaser add vendor (F4) it says no values exist, now i enter the vendor manually in the field, it says "vendor is not know in backend".
    I replicated vendors from backend and maintained all the attributes also.
    thanks
    ravi

    Hi Ravi,
    Check whether the replication of vendors is properly done or not.
    Check for the entry of replicated back end vendors in VENMAP table. Also all the replicated vendors would have come and sit in your Vendor Root Org.
    Check the attribute settings of the vendor root org like Co. code, logical system for vendor, accounting system for vendor etc.
    Also as explained above check whether the vendor is assigned to responsible P.Org, logical system and responsible back end vendor using Manage Business Partners transaction under the Vendor Data tab.
    Hope this helps in resolving your issue. Clarifications are welcome.
    Award points for suitable answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • Local Machine not present in local configuration store

    Having trouble getting Lync 2013 installed on a Windows Server 2012R2 OS.
    Pool consists of Lync Server and SharePoint Server.  Using Enterprise version so Databases are on separate SQL 2012 server. All machines domained. Logged in as myself who has domain admin creds.
    Topology published without issue - all machines entered as FQDN using "servername.domain.net".  Databases created in and showing in SQL MGMT Studio.
    Moving on to Deployment Wizard and running through the steps:
    Step 1 of Lync 2013 Deployment Wizard - Install Local Configuration Store
    > Install Local Configuration Store
    Import-CSConfiguration -FileName "C:\Users\MYNAME\AppData\Local\Temp\CSConfigData-2015_02_12-14_39_58.zip" -Verbose -LocalStore
    > Enable local replica service
    Enable-CSReplica -Verbose -Confirm:$false -Report "C:\Users\MYNAME\AppData\Local\Temp\Enable-CSReplica-[2015_02_12][14_39_53].html"
    Creating new log file "C:\Users\MYNAME\AppData\Local\Temp\Enable-CSReplica-d761588e-475f-4b27-9345-d9ff17390a52.xml".
    Enable replica service for the Lync Server computer.
    Creating new log file "C:\Users\MYNAME\AppData\Local\Temp\Enable-CSReplica-[2015_02_12][14_39_53].html".
    Enable-CSReplica" processing has completed successfully.
    Detailed results can be found at "C:\Users\MYNAME\AppData\Local\Temp\Enable-CSReplica-[2015_02_12][14_39_53].html".
    > Replicate-CsCmsCertificates
    Logging status to: C:\Users\MYNAME\AppData\Local\Temp\ReplicateCMSCertificates-[2015_02_12][14_39_53].html
    Task Status Completed.
    Step 2 of Deployment Wizard - Setup or Remove Lync Server Components
    > Bootstrap-CsComputer
    Logging status to: C:\Users\MYNAME\AppData\Local\Temp\BootstrapFull-[2015_02_12][14_47_42].html
    Checking prerequisites for bootstrapper...
    Checking prerequisite WMIEnabled...prerequisite satisfied.
    Checking prerequisite NoBootstrapperOnBranchOfficeAppliance...prerequisite satisfied.
    Checking prerequisite SupportedOS...prerequisite satisfied.
    Checking prerequisite NoOtherVersionInstalled...prerequisite satisfied.
    Host name: LyncServer.domain.net
    WARNING! Host not found in topology. All roles will be uninstalled.
    Disabling unused roles...
    Executing PowerShell command: Disable-CSComputer -Confirm:$false -Verbose -Report "C:\Users\MYNAME\AppData\Local\Temp\Disable-CSComputer-[2015_02_12][14_47_49].html"
    Checking prerequisites for roles...
    Checking prerequisite SupportedOS...prerequisite satisfied.
    Checking prerequisite SupportedOSNoDC...prerequisite satisfied.
    Checking prerequisite SupportedSqlRtcLocal...prerequisite satisfied.
    Checking prerequisite WMIEnabled...prerequisite satisfied.
    Checking prerequisite NoOtherVersionInstalled...prerequisite satisfied.
    Checking prerequisite PowerShell...prerequisite satisfied.
    Checking prerequisite WindowsIdentityFoundation...prerequisite satisfied.
    Checking prerequisite SqlInstanceRtcLocal...prerequisite satisfied.
    Checking prerequisite VCredist...prerequisite satisfied.
    Checking prerequisite SqlNativeClient...prerequisite satisfied.
    Checking prerequisite SqlClrTypes...prerequisite satisfied.
    Checking prerequisite SqlSharedManagementObjects...prerequisite satisfied.
    Checking prerequisite UcmaRedist...prerequisite satisfied.
    No databases discovered, skipping Install-CsDatabase...
    No roles discovered, skipping Enable-CsComputer...
    am now stuck as the Step 3 shows "Local Machine not present in local configuration store"

    Hi Dee McClanahan,
    I suggest you should check whether or not the names are spelled correctly in the topology builder.
    If this is not the case, I suggest you can create and publish a new topology.
    To remove the published entry run:
    remove-CsConfigurationStoreLocation
    In addition, I’m a little confused about what you say “Pool consists of Lync Server and SharePoint Server.”
    Do you mean that you installed Lync Server and SharePoint Server on the same box ?
    Best regards,
    Eric

  • User Password Not Replicated during ACS Replication

    I am provisioning user accounts in ACS through a provisioning system. The provisioned ACS is set to replicate user and group database to another ACS. Replication interval time is set to 15 mins.
    Problem is that even though the replication cycle runs every 15 mins, if no user is added or deleted, the pre-checks determine that outbound replication is not required and cycle is completed. Hence, if user's password change, they are not replicated to other ACS and in case the authentication request goes to the other ACS then it fails. Manual replication is fine.
    How to make sure replication is run even in case of user password change and not just when a user is added or removed.

    Hi,
    What is the acs ver ? Are the user accounts you are referring to stored? i.e. are the local to the ACS server itself, or are they defined in an external user database (e.g. Active Directory, LDAP, etc.)?
    Users defined via Active Directory are dynamically mapped to a user account in ACS and this account information is typically not replicated since the users created are dynamic and can change properties based on
    configuration/changes in Active Directory itself.
    Regards,
    Jagdeep

  • Could not connect to backend system through portal via Web Dispatcher

    Web dispatcher redirecting problem
    Dear Experts,
    I have implemented a scenario which comprised of customizing that is developed in Portal EP7. What customizing does is getting report from backend system (ERP 6.0)
    According to the needs for reaching the portal from internet I configured the SAP Web Dispatcher in the environment as you may see its contents below.
    The problem is when I run the customizing in portal system then it requires connecting to backend system (ECC 6.0) to get the data (report). But from this point on web browser comes to a blank page, could not view the data that is from backend system via portal. Because in the time when it tries to retrieve data in backend system, on the left bottom of the explorer the indicator shows internet address that system uses connecting to the backend system as local network address of the backend system which is not known in internet therefore I get blank page.
    The question is how to configure the web dispatcher in a way that both portal and backend systems could be reachable from internet?
    Contents of profile file of Web Dispatcher as;
    SAPSYSTEMNAME = WDP
    SAPGLOBALHOST = portald
    SAPSYSTEM = 02
    INSTANCE_NAME = W02
    DIR_CT_RUN = $(DIR_EXE_ROOT)\$(OS_UNICODE)\NTAMD64
    DIR_EXECUTABLE = $(DIR_CT_RUN)
    Accesssability of Message Server
    rdisp/mshost = portald
    ms/http_port = 8101
    Configuration for medium scenario
    icm/max_conn = 500
    icm/max_sockets = 1024
    icm/req_queue_len = 500
    icm/min_threads = 10
    icm/max_threads = 50
    mpi/total_size_MB = 80
    SAP Web Dispatcher Ports
    #icm/server_port_0 = PROT=HTTP,PORT=81$$
    SAP Web Dispatcher Ports
    icm/server_port_0 = PROT=HTTP,PORT=60000
    icm/HTTP/redirect_0 = PREFIX=/, TO=/irj/index.html
    icm/HTTP/redirect_0 = PORT=50000
    #maximum number of concurrent connections to one server
    wdisp/HTTP/max_pooled_con = 500
    wdisp/HTTPS/max_pooled_con = 500
    Configuration for medium scenario
    icm/max_conn = 500
    icm/max_sockets = 1024
    icm/req_queue_len = 500
    icm/min_threads = 10
    icm/max_threads = 50
    mpi/total_size_MB = 80
    Regards,
    Ali Taner

    Hi,
    To resovle this you must have registered FQDN for your backend system as well. When you call the report from Portal using internet it should call that FQDN of your backend system then DNS will resolve this & you will get the expected page. This way only you can resolve this issue.
    Thanks,
    Sachin Sable

  • Urgent ! Purchase Requisition not created in Backend Classic Scenario

    Hello All,
    I am implementing the classic scenario SRM 5.5. We have replicated the material form the backend to SRM system. Also we have made the necessary config such as maintain backend system, Define Backend System for Product Category, Define Number Ranges for Shopping Carts and Follow-on Document, Define Number Ranges per Backend System for Follow-on Document. Now the problem i am facing is that in the dev system SC with line item with desc and the product (material replicated from backend) as line items are created and their PR is created in the backend. However the same is not happening in the QA system. Only those SC with line item as Desc/text only are created in the backend and those having have product id dont transfer to create PR in the backend. There is no message in the RZ20, SM13, ST22, SM21 etc. Alsowhen i try to tranfer it using the FM BBP_PD_SC_TRANSFER it is created successfully and there is entry in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB which is cleared afetr clean_reqreq_up is run. I am not sure whats is going wrong. Please help me out guys.
    Thanks
    Karthik

    Hi Andy,
    Thanks for the quick responses. I dont see any PR doc no and neither the BUS object type in BBP_PD item details. Please see the o/p below
    BE_LOG_SYSTEM                R3QAS400
    BE_OBJ_ITEM
    BE_OBJECT_TYPE
    BE_OBJECT_ID
    BE_REFOBJ_TYPE
    BE_REFOBJ
    BE_REFOBJ_ITEM
    BE_REFOBJ_SBITM
    BE_REFOBJ_TYPE2
    BE_REFOBJ2
    BE_REFOBJ_ITEM2
    BE_REFOBJ_FYEAR2             0000
    BE_STGE_LOC
    BE_PLANT                     IE01
    BE_BATCH
    BE_VAL_TYPE
    BE_MOVE_REAS                 0000
    BE_EXPERYDATE                000000
    BE_PUR_GROUP                 440
    BE_PUR_ORG                   IE01
    BE_CO_CODE                   IE01
    BE_DOC_TYPE                  EC
    BE_ACCREQUIRED
    BE_SP_STK_IND
    BE_INFO_REC
    BE_MOVE_TYPE                 101, so i am not sure what could be going wrong.
    Is there any way i can debug it and find out what the cause is,
    though the calls to the bapis are asynchronous. Also just for the reference sake my backend is 46C. I have been grazing through the notes but haven't found a substantial one.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Accessible PDF files and forms

    I am beside myself with the lack of help and/or interest in the Accessiblity area. We have been mandated to make all our PDF files accessible on our Web site. We have been able to master many of the issues regarding tags and form fields, but still ha

  • How to create user defined functions in xi.

    how to create user defined functions in xi. can anyone give info with screen shots.

  • Splitting of material

    Dear All, I am procuring one SFG (material no:1 (BOM Maintained)) from vendor directly. This SFG is contaning (one spring (material no:2) and cover (material no:3) assembly). For the production of FG (material no:4 (BOM Maintained)) I will consume th

  • How to invoke web services BPEL from ODI

    Hi All, I tried to invoke a BPEL Web service through OdiInvokeWebService tool, and throws me the following message: Request invalid. NullPointerException* This is the WSDL that I need to consume <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <WL5G3N0:definit

  • When will Oracle JDeveloper 11.1.1.4 (weblogic 10.1.4) be available?

    Hi, during last month a lot of interim patches for jdev and wls was released. When can we get a fully regression tested version including all last patches? Ciao André