Local zone only in network view.

I have not been able to figure this one out. In older versions of the Mac OS i can look at the network and see my other Appletalk zones off site as well as PC's that are on IP. Since the install of Leopard I can't see the other sites on the network whether they are on appletalk or IP.
I can ping all the macs I'm looking for and they even show in Apple Remote Desktop but not in the finder. Do I have to assign these macs to a workgroup that they reside in before i can see them on my end?
any help would be great.

Check in ServerAdmin, click the server (top-most item, above AFP), click settings, then Network.
Jeff

Similar Messages

Network access from local zones on a Solaris 10 router

I'm kind of stuck at an interesting problem.
I have a Solaris 10u6 system which is itself a router between a number of networks.
It has several dozen routes to different networks via different next-hop gateways,
just one of which is a default route to the ISP to internet.
I thought of setting up local zones to securely run infrastructure services (BIND,
Squid, Mail relay) on this machine, with only a single dedicated public IP address
(from our delegated address space) per such zone. Zones use a shared-IP stack
on one of the machine's VLAN interfaces (the LAN part with public IP addresses).
The problem is - since this machine is the gateway for the subnet used for the
local zones, they don't inherit any default route. The one default we have to the
ISP is on another interface's subnet.
[root@ns8 /]# netstat -rn | grep default
[root@ns8 /]# netstat -rn | wc -l
50
On a side note, these zones do inherit dozens of other routes (50 above) with
next-hop routers not on the local zone's subnet - so these are also not accessible.
I think such useless routes should also be filtered away - as "mismatching" default
routes are.
Due to all this the zone has no networking outside its subnet/mask: it doesn't
even try to send anything, since there is not a single route with a matching next
hop router, i.e.
[root@ns8 /]# traceroute -nI 194.87.0.50
traceroute to 194.87.0.50 (194.87.0.50), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 xx.yy.zz.8 0.102 ms !H 0.032 ms !H 0.027 ms !H
To reiterate, this setup is different from that of the numerous replays of "How to
set up internet for zones with virtual IP addresses?"
That recipe suggests to add a fake router and maintain its ARP address to be
that of the real default gateway, and set up NAT to rewrite private IP addresses
to the global zone's public IP. While I've also used the recipe a number of times,
it does not seem feasible in this router's case - there are too many next-hop
routers (and learned with a dynamic routing protocol), not just one default-gw.
I can of course go back to running services in the global zone and binding them
to these dedicated public IP addresses via configuration files - and this works
since the global zone has access to any needed routers having IP addresses
in relevant subnets - but I hoped to secure the system a bit more and separate
routing from infrastructure tasks...
So the question is: how can I set up networking for local zones in this case
when they are running on a router? Is it possible?
Thanks,
//Jim

You can set the Airport Extreme in "Bridge" mode, and then it will just extend the existing subnet.
Airport Utility -> Airport Extreme -> Internet -> Connection Sharing -> Off (bridge mode)

Changing MTU for local-zone

I'm getting ready to go to gigabit jumbo frame (MTU 9000) network, but I'm not there yet.
I have some nice Intel NICs, and I set them so they can do a MTU 16128 but fix the MTU at 1500 until I make the change.
But the local-zones interface won't change with the global:
e1000g1: flags=1001000803<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,IPv4,FIXEDMTU> mtu 1500 index 3
inet 0.0.0.0 netmask ff000000 broadcast 0.255.255.255
ether 0:e:c:c4:48:a8
e1000g1:1: flags=1000803<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 16128 index 3
zone test-zone
inet 10.0.0.191 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255
I would like the local-zone's virtual interface to have a MTU of 1500 just like it's proud parent.
I've tried a /etc/hostname.e1000g1:1 with 'mtu 1500'. That creates a virtual interface with the proper MTU, but the zone's interface becomes e1000g1:2 still with a MTU of 16128.
How can I set the MTU of the local-zone?
Thanks.

Its now a few months since i last played with networking in zones, but i don't think you can do that. IIRC there are only a limited set of options which can be set to a shared interface which belongs to a zone.
I think that in order for this to work you would have to dedicate an interface to the zone (i.e. 'exclusive mode'), then you can probably change the MTU from inside the zone.
However this is my guess, i haven't tested or verified it..
.7/M.

Windows 7 on Mac Pro, Local Access Only, No Internet

Installed Windows 7 on my 2.66 Quad Mac Pro. Whenever I boot, the network adapter icon in the traybar comes up with a yellow slash through it that says "Local Access Only" Looked into troubleshooting, turning off Network power management, turning off IP6, etc... No fixes. I can browse my local area network but not the internet.
When I boot in safe mode with networking, the error does not show on the network taskbar icon and I can browse the internet just fine.
Here's the temporary fix that I found works every time in standard boot mode.
1. Assign a manual IP address to the network adapter. (192.168.1.160). (make sure the IP is in your DHCP Scheme and the IP is available (no other devices using that IP)
2. It will automatically assign a subnet (255.255.255.0)
3. Close the networking window.
4. Right click on the network icon with the yellow through it in the task bar and click "Troubleshoot problems"
5. It will come up quickly with a fix (saying you should not be using a manual IP). Click "Apply Fix" then windows 7 will put the computer back to DHCP Mode.
6. Try it now. Everything should be working.
No permanent fix on this yet but when a new boot camp 3.1 network driver comes out, hopefully it should fix it. If anyone else has a permanent solution, it would be appreciated.

My thought - because the only issues I've had personally with Vista/7 have had to do with modems and routers, and went away once I upgraded those. Sometimes there are firmware updates to deal with new OS.
Your post didn't seem to mention wired/wireless or modem and router in place.
you might want to look for an Intel driver. Also, you must have had network to install and update Windows 7, look to rollback the network driver if possible, or uninstall + restart and let Windows reinstall a device driver.

Install NetConnect in Global Zone of Solaris 10 x86 with 5 local zone fail

Problem:
Install NetConnect in Global Zone of Solaris 10 x86 with 5 local zone failed
But I didn't have any issue with the same pkg in Solaris 9
Steps taken:
# groupadd netcon
# useradd -d /export/home/netcon -g netcon -m netcon
# vi /etc/shadow
change LK to NP
# ./UninstallNetConnect.003.002.001.sh
# ./InstallNetConnect.003.002.001.sh
Enter the user account to use: netcon
Enter group: netcon
Installing Sun(SM) Net Connect Proxy Core as <SUNWsrspx>
## Installing part 1 of 1.
/etc/opt/SUNWsrspx/CustomerCert.pem
/etc/opt/SUNWsrspx/SRSCACert.pem
/etc/opt/SUNWsrspx/binaries
/etc/opt/SUNWsrspx/srsproxyconfig.cfg
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srsexec
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srsinstall
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srsinstallmode
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srsproxy
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srspxrun
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srspxstat
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srspxtrace
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srsuser
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srsxfer
/opt/SUNWsrspx/lib/srsimapi.jar
/usr/lib/libsrsimapi.so.1
[ verifying class <none> ]
## Executing postinstall script.
copying initial install customer cert into place
copying initial install srs cert into place
copying initial install proxy config file into place
removing any existing uninstallscript before copying the correct one
copying uninstall script into place
/var/sadm/pkg/SUNWsrspx/install/postinstall: /opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srspxrun: cannot execute
proxy queue initialization failed
pkgadd: ERROR: postinstall script did not complete successfully
Installation of <SUNWsrspx> failed.
ERROR: pkgadd failed for: SUNWsrspx
Please correct this situation and rerun the installation.
Exiting installation.
# cat /var/adm/messages
Oct 7 00:00:01 planet root: [ID 702911 daemon.error] ERROR: proxy queue initialization failed
Any clue, or it will only possible in Global zone that didn't have any local zone
thanks in advance

Problem:
Install NetConnect in Global Zone of Solaris 10 x86
with 5 local zone failed
But I didn't have any issue with the same pkg in
Solaris 9
Steps taken:
# groupadd netcon
# useradd -d /export/home/netcon -g netcon -m netcon
# vi /etc/shadow
change LK to NP
# ./UninstallNetConnect.003.002.001.sh
# ./InstallNetConnect.003.002.001.sh
Enter the user account to use: netcon
Enter group: netcon
Installing Sun(SM) Net Connect Proxy Core as
<SUNWsrspx>
## Installing part 1 of 1.
/etc/opt/SUNWsrspx/CustomerCert.pem
/etc/opt/SUNWsrspx/SRSCACert.pem
/etc/opt/SUNWsrspx/binaries
/etc/opt/SUNWsrspx/srsproxyconfig.cfg
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srsexec
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srsinstall
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srsinstallmode
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srsproxy
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srspxrun
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srspxstat
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srspxtrace
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srsuser
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srsxfer
/opt/SUNWsrspx/lib/srsimapi.jar
/usr/lib/libsrsimapi.so.1
[ verifying class <none> ]
## Executing postinstall script.
copying initial install customer cert into place
copying initial install srs cert into place
copying initial install proxy config file into place
removing any existing uninstallscript before copying
the correct one
copying uninstall script into place
/var/sadm/pkg/SUNWsrspx/install/postinstall:
/opt/SUNWsrspx/bin/srspxrun: cannot execute
proxy queue initialization failed
pkgadd: ERROR: postinstall script did not complete
successfully
Installation of <SUNWsrspx> failed.
ERROR: pkgadd failed for: SUNWsrspx
Please correct this situation and rerun the
installation.
Exiting installation.
# cat /var/adm/messages
Oct 7 00:00:01 planet root: [ID 702911 daemon.error]
ERROR: proxy queue initialization failed
Any clue, or it will only possible in Global zone
that didn't have any local zone
thanks in advance
[I believe that it does not work in x86, watches with pkginfo - l SUNWsrspx, in the platform.
Willy Suarez
Sopport UNIX
Colombia/code]

Install SMC Server 3.6 in Sol 10 local zone?

Dear all,
Is it possible to install and running SMC Server 3.6 in local zone with whole root (not sparse) steup?
thanks

Is it possible to install and running SMC Server 3.6
in local zone with whole root (not sparse) steup?Right now the only part of SunMC that can run in a zone is the SunMC Agent. The Server can only be installed into the global zone. But it's a pretty good bet that you'll be able to do it with a future version of SunMC.
Regards,
[email protected]

Sun Live Upgrade with local zones Solaris 10

I have M800 server running global root (/) fs on local disk and running 6 local zones on another local disk. I am running solaris 5.10 8/07.
I used live upgrade to patch the system and created new BE (lucreate). Both root fs are mirror as RAID-1.
When I ran lucreate, it copies all 6 local zones root fs to the global root fs and failed no enogh space.
What is the best procedure to use lu with local zones.
Note: I used lu with global zone only, and worked without any problem.
regards,

I have been trying to use luupgrade for Solaris10 on Sparc, 05/09 -> 10/09.
lucreate is successful, but luactivate directs me to install 'the rest of the packages' in order to make the BE stable enough to activate. I try to find the packages indicated , but find only "virtual packages" which contain only pkgmap.
I installed upgrade 6 on a spare disk to make sure my u7 installation was not defective, but got similar results.
I got beyond luactivate on x86 a while ago, but had other snags which I left unattended.

VISTA & WIRELESS : HOW TO SOLVE LOCAL ACCESS ONLY?

Thank you for your reading and possible answer(s),
UNABLE TO GET "LOCAL AND INTERNET ACCESS" UNDER VISTA, WHILE IT WAS POSSIBLE UNDER XP
I used to get connected "home-like" with XP to a "secondary wireless router" (SSID: Wlancomtrend - no authentication needed, no work group, signal strength: Excellent), which gets the internet signal from a "main wireless router", plugged to the DSL line (SSID: Wireless - no authenticatin needed, no work group, signal strength: Good / Low).
I am not the administrator of these routers. I used to get DNS automatically under TCPIP properties.
VISTA DOESN'T LET ME ACCESS THE INTERNET, THOUGH I MANAGE TO CONNECT TO THE SAME ROUTER
It says: "Access: local only"; and under Network and sharing center it says "unidentified network". I gess I'm a bit unfamiliar with this OS and do not master all its settings. I also marked off security essentials like Firewall under Windows security center, to prevent any possible internet access blocking. My laptop power plan is also set to "High performance".
- I suspect my ID network is not well configured. Under System properties (right click on the "My computer icon") > Computer name > network ID > Join a Domain or Workgroup: I'm trying to keep the "This is a home computer" setting, but it goes back to "This computer is part of a business network" all the time, even after reboot. How to fix this, by the way?
- Under Network and Sharing center > Customize the current connection > location type > i set it to "public".
Other factors maybe irrelevant: / Sharing discovery > Network discovery: "On" / > file sharing: "On".
I get DNS automatically under TCPIP properties (as with XP).
A couple of days ago, VISTA managed to get internet with the "main wireless router" (SSID: Wireless - no authentication needed, signal strength: Good / Low). I just tried to set ID network to "This is a home computer" and rebooted. Under the network window, I also tried to tick a network location or workgroup. This may not be important, though.
I STILL JUST GET LOCAL ACCESS ONLY WITH MY WIRELESS CONNECTION UNDER VISTA
Any help? Molta mercé / Many thanks
Also tried:
- Automatically Detect Settings checked in internet options
- Obtain an IP address automatically under TCPIP properties
- Enable DHCP
- Disable User Account Control in Security Center
- Disable most of the Vista security stuff
- Remove and set up all connections
- IPv6 off
- etc.
Google Occitan www.google.com/intl/oc/ | http://www.eurominority.org/documents/cartes/occitania.gif

Well, I have been thoroughly frustrated by this networking problem in Vista. What is so INSIDIOUS about it, is that it can happen spontaneously/periodically. When it first started happening, I could go for hours with
no problems. And then all of the sudden, it's "LOCAL ACCESS ONLY." I'd even lose my Internet connection completely, but then it would come back momentarily. Lately though, the problem got worse. It would happen every 5-10 minutes.
What really drove me nuts originally is that I had set up a new wireless router: a TP-Link TL-WR941N. Very nice and powerful. It can reach up 3 stories in a multi-story home. I have my computer up on the 3rd floor. My Internet
connection was no problem... for MONTHS. And then, all of the sudden, this "LOCAL ACCESS ONLY" problem started cropping up. My network connection would change to this, then after a few moments, go back to "LOCAL AND INTERNET".
I figured it was some kind of "momentary atmospheric problem". But no. It continued on, for days and days after it had started. Why? Why would this start happening when nothing else had changed?
Ah, but that's where I was amiss. You see, Vista gets updated frequently by the powers that be at Microsoft. And who knows what things they really do? You don't get a full report. You just keep getting "important security updates".
Well, I suspect that at some point, they introduced some changes which affect the networking capability of Vista. And so, since that point, you'll have periodic problems as I have.
Microsoft is so focused on Windows-7, that they really can't be bothered with Vista. AND... I really wonder if they leave defects like this around to give incentive for people to upgrade to Windows-7. I wouldn't put it past them.
Well, the main thing is that each person's situation is different. Some people have 3rd party software that is tripping it up (like Norton or McAfee). I think a lot of the problem depends upon the type of wireless router you're connected with
and the type of network (e.g. G vs. N). So that's why some fixes proposed solve the problem while others do nothing.
If you try any settings changes, I strongly recommend that you do them one at a time. Also, keep note of what you've applied. It is important to be able to roll back those changes if need be.
So, this was the first friendly user tip that helped me:
Over the course of several days, I made only one change at a time, then waited to see if the failure occurred again. I'm an IT networking professional so I based my decisions on my familiarity with network protocols, impact, risk, ease of
implementation and fallback positions.
These are the steps I took:
1. Installed Teracopy, which takes over the file copying function of Windows.
http://www.codesector.com/teracopy.php
2. Disabled IPv6 (Control Panel -> Network Connections -> <your connection> -> Properties)
3. Disabled Link Layer Topology Discovery Mapper and Responder (Control Panel -> Network Connections -> <your connection> -> Properties)
4. Set Power settings to high performance (Control Panel -> Power Options) and disabled the screensaver (Control Panel -> Personalization -> Screen Saver)
5. Reduced my Linksys router's MTU to 1480 (although I doubt this was part of the solution)
6. Enabled ECN with the following command "netsh interface tcp set global ecncapability=enabled" from command line (Start -> cmd)
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb726965.aspx
Possibly step 6 is all you really need to do. Please post if this works for you.
Well, I figured I'd give step #6 a shot. Why not? There are a few other command line settings recommended, but I decided to try it alone first:
   netsh interface tcp set global ecncapability=enabled
At first, this seemed to be the only thing I needed to do. My "LOCAL ACCESS ONLY" problem seemed to stop happening, observed over a 20 minute period. It happened again for a moment, but then Internet Access returned right away. I thought
the problem was solved... But then "LOCAL ACCESS ONLY" came back and stayed. I had to run these commands as well:
   netsh interface tcp set global autotuninglevel=disabled
   netsh interface tcp set global rss=disabled
This WORKED! I seem to sustain my Internet connection for much longer periods. LOCAL ACCESS ONLY does pop up sometimes, but it is very brief. I think it's something to do with my router going into "sleep mode" on the
connection. If I try to make a connection to a website, it comes back to life and I have Internet Access again.
LASTLY...
There is one other thing I want to mention, in case someone else reading this has the same problem.
One day after a severe storm that caused a power outage, I started getting "LOCAL ACCESS ONLY." The wireless router was there and I'd connect to it, but no Internet. I connected directly to it, hardwired, and STILL had the same problem. I
rebooted the router, the cable modem, you name it. Same problem. Being directly connected to the cable modem was fine. Did my router get fried from a power surge during the storm? It seemed perfectly fine in all other respects. I
eventually contacted the TP-LINK customer support. I learned something new... the problem was with the IP ADDRESS of the router conflicting with the cable modem.
By default, your wireless router will take IP address 192.168.1.1. In some cases, this will be a problem if the cable modem is taking the same IP address
and is finicky about the address of the wireless router. It was fine for almost 6 months... why did it become a problem all of the sudden? Bizarre. Suspicion was that the ISP changed some things (they remotely reprogram
the modems from time to time, you know). The solution? Give the wireless router a different address (e.g. 192.168.2.1). It worked!  I was able to get Internet access after that. Worked fine for several months,
too... until I started getting that periodic "LOCAL ACCESS ONLY" again. But the solution above seems to have addressed it.
Good luck to those having problems. I sure wish Microsoft would be more dedicated to its customer base. But thankfully we've got forums like this which bring people together to help solve each others problems. :-)

Can u proxy between two LOCAL zones on a Gatekeeper?

Is it possible to proxy a call between two local zones on the same gatekeeper?
Thanks for any replies.

I also tried this last year to overcome issues with Access Control Lists preventing school sites from directly communicating with each other, and unfortunately the answer is no! The proxy will only work with calls to remote zones.
However from version 12.3 (4)T of the MCM gatekeeper IOS, there is also a feature included called IP to IP gateway, which will do what you want, and will actually work better than the proxy as it is codec transparent (the proxy will re-encode your VC to H.261 and G.711).
More info can be found here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps5640/products_qanda_item09186a00801da69b.shtml

Local zone doesnot boot

Hi all,
I have the following NIC setup:
ifconfig -alo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
bge0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet 10.0.1.201 netmask fffff000 broadcast 10.0.15.255
ether 0:3:ba:99:9f:57
bge1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
inet 10.0.1.202 netmask fffff000 broadcast 10.0.15.255
ether 0:3:ba:99:9f:58
bge2: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 4
inet 10.0.1.203 netmask fffff000 broadcast 10.0.15.255
ether 0:3:ba:99:9f:59
I configured and installed a zone named 'z1'
cat /etc/zones/z1.xml<zone name="z1" zonepath="/export/home/zone/1" autoboot="true">
<inherited-pkg-dir directory="/lib"/>
<inherited-pkg-dir directory="/platform"/>
<inherited-pkg-dir directory="/sbin"/>
<inherited-pkg-dir directory="/usr"/>
<network address="10.0.1.203" physical="bge2"/>
</zone>
zoneadm list -cvID NAME STATUS PATH
0 global running /
- z1 installed /export/home/zone/1
while booting the zone 'z1', following happens
zoneadm -z z2 bootzoneadm: zone 'z2': bge2:1: could not bring interface up: address in use by zone 'global': Cannot assign requested address
zoneadm: zone 'z2': call to zoneadmd failed
Did I miss something?
What is my misstake?

Hi
you don't have to use the same network adress for your global and a local zone. You have to use another adress in your lokal zone or delete the beg2 interface in your global zone. That's all.
harruh

Patchsvr in a local zone

Hey,
I haven't been able to find any posts about this, so forgive me if it's come up before..
Anyway, i'm attempting to run Sun's patchsvr proxy server for patches within a zone. So far i've not been able to find any indiciation of whether this should work, or should not. Sofar i'm out of luck..
It seems to sort-of work, as in, watching the logs when a client using updatemanager connects to the proxy there seems to be some form of connection attempt to sun and the client doesn't complain of any problems, nor are there any obvious problems in the server logs, however the client also doesn't show any updates as being available once the analyze transaction has completed, while when going direct to sun using the same client there are clearly updates available..

I can install patch 119788-09 in a local zone. Here the original messages:
root@container:/tmp> patchadd -d 119788-09
Validating patches...
Loading patches installed on the system...
Done!
Loading patches requested to install.
Done!
The following requested patches have packages not installed on the system
Package SUNWpsvrr from directory SUNWpsvrr in patch 119788-09 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWpsvrr will not be applied to the system.
Package SUNWpsvru from directory SUNWpsvru in patch 119788-09 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWpsvru will not be applied to the system.
Checking patches that you specified for installation.
Done!
Approved patches will be installed in this order:
119788-09
Checking installed patches...
Executing prepatch script...
Verifying sufficient filesystem capacity (dry run method)...
Installing patch packages...
Patch 119788-09 has been successfully installed.
See /var/sadm/patch/119788-09/log for details
Executing postpatch script...
Patch packages installed:
SUNWppror
SUNWpprou
root@container:/tmp>
There is no message, that this is a global zone only patch.
And, I don't want the patchsvr binaries in all the zones installed. I don't want, that everybody installs his own patch proxy.
Is it possible to download the packages alone ? Distributing packages as a patch is a strange idea.
Sincerely
Bernhard

Restrict Local Administrators from change Network property

In my office Environment we are using Development machines on which every developer has Local Administrator rights on there system. We are using 2 Internet lines in which one line is fast speed and another one is slow one, due to slow internet speed on
second line some peoples manually change the Gateway IP and switch from slow to Fast one, to stop this we need to restrict those users from changing IP on windows 7. Only domain Administrator can able to change that Setting. we are using Window Server 2008
R2 as ADDS. is there any way to stop this using domain group Policy? or Local security policy?

Hi Siddheshrsawant,
Sorry, we can’t restrict local administrators from changing network property via Group Policy, and this is by design.
For confirmation, the following thread also focused on the similar issue and can be referred to for information.
Unable to lock down Network Connections settings with Group Policy
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/32045ab3-0496-4f5e-b2c2-71ba0f2ed073/unable-to-lock-down-network-connections-settings-with-group-policy?forum=winserverGP
Best regards,
Frank Shen

Local connection only

Have just been connected to bt broadband. I pad connected fine but hp laptop has local connection only. Have phoned bt advisor didn't know what I was talking about. Have read about downloading something can someone please tell me how I do this. I can connect with Ethernet cable.

You do not need to download anything in order to make a connection with an Ethernet cable.
Make sure that you have plugged the Ethernet cable into one of the yellow sockets on the Homehub. If you use the Windows trouble shooting by opening the Network and Sharing (right click on the yellow triangle at the bottom right of screen) and you will see a red cross on the diagram of your network. Click on the red cross and see what Windows says.
What version of Windows are you using?
EDIT: If it's Vista see this post.
https://community.bt.com/t5/Other-Broadband-Queries/trouble-connecting-laptop-to-hub-4/m-p/1251183/h...

My Apple TV only letting me view latest releases, the kids only have the option to preview the kids movies

My Apple TV only letting me view latest releases, the kids only have the option to preview most other movies, no parental lock on,

Checked all of the above and no apparent problem. Last weekend I uninstalled and then reinstalled iTunes. Seemed to have fixed the problem ( I thought) but the next time I tried to display a slideshow with music from my PC, the PC wasn't recognised. Likewise, although my iPad shows up as a device in iTunes on my PC, I am unable to access the PC's libraries using the iPad remote app. Via the Control Panel on my PC, I confirmed that the ATV shows as an attached device (wired) on my network.
Totally stumped and frustrated. The "Help" call remains.

ACTIVITY NETWORK VIEW

Are there any more options available in regards to the
activity Network view. This seems very limited as is and I
believe even P3 had more options. The activities and
relationships are not drawn well at all (as vectors?) and
we'd like to be able to distinguish activity boxes based
on codes. i.e. enable each activity to have a unique color
based on a user code. Beyond the gantt view, the network
view is a key output for us and P6 is not helping in this
regard.
Your comments would be
appreciated.

To the best of my knowledge the only thing you can do
is change the layout/detail of the boxes and that is
very limited. You can change the color, but its an
"all or nothing" feature (no breakout by codes, WBS,
etc). I'm sure its under "future enhancement
request".
I like the Activity
Network layout as well. I can, however, create
different colors using filters based on codes in the
Gantt Chart. Tedious, but it can be done.<br
/>
Of course these features are only in
Client. The web doesnt even provide the Activity
Network and the Gantt chart is current bar, critical
and baseline only. No flexibility.

Local zone only in network view.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for